Transanal proximal rectosigmoidectomy. A new operation for severe chronic idiopathic constipation associated with megarectosigmoid

Transanal proximal rectosigmoidectomy: a single-center experience in surgically treated severe medically refractory idiopathic constipation

PURPOSE

To present the functional results after a transanal proximal rectosigmoidectomy in patients with severe idiopathic constipation in which medical treatment has failed.

METHODS

Patients with severe idiopathic constipation who underwent transanal proximal rectosigmoidectomy (TPRS) at Children's Hospital Colorado between June 2019 and March 2024 were included in the study. We compared multiple pre- and post-operative outcome measures and the patient's bowel regimen before and after resection.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients underwent TPRS, 10 of whom were male. The average age at the time of surgery was 10.1 years (range 5-19). Seven patients have moderate to severe autism. Constipation-related clinic visits, family calls, procedural intervention, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations notably decreased frequency after TPRS. Laxative dosages and enema volume requirements were also reduced after surgery. Before surgery, all the patients suffered from daily fecal accidents, while post-operatively, all were completely free of stool accidents.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, for patients who suffer from severe medically refractory idiopathic constipation, TPRS has provided improvement in their symptoms and decreased the complications inherent to this chronic disease. Parents and patients attest to a profound positive transformation in their quality of life after surgery.

Radiologically supervised bowel management program outcome in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze our radiologically supervised bowel management program (RS-BMP) outcomes in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted. We included all patients with CIC who participated in our RS-BMP at Children´s Hospital Colorado from July 2016 to October 2022.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included. The average time with constipation was 5.6 years. Before our RS-BMP, 95% had received non-radiologically supervised treatments, and 71% had attempted two or more treatments. Overall, 90% had tried Polyethylene Glycol and 43% Senna. Nine patients had a history of Botox injections. Five underwent anterograde continence procedure, and one a sigmoidectomy. Behavioral disorders (BD) were found in 23%. At the end of the RS-BMP, 96% of patients had successful outcomes, 73% were on Senna, and 27% were on enemas. Megarectum was detected in 93% of patients with successful outcomes and 100% with unsuccessful outcomes (p = 0.210). Of the patients with BD, 89% had successful outcomes, and 11% had unsuccessful.

CONCLUSION

Our RS-BMP has been proven to be effective in treating CIC. The radiologically supervised use of Senna and enemas was the appropriate treatment in 96% of the patients. BD and megarectum were associated with unsuccessful outcomes.

The success rate of antegrade enemas for the management of idiopathic constipation

PURPOSE

Most patients with idiopathic constipation achieve daily voluntary bowel movements with stimulant laxatives after a "Structured Bowel Management Program" (BMP). A small percentage require rectal enemas. One week in a BMP to find the right enema recipe results in a success rate great than 95%. Once the enema is radiologically and clinically effective, antegrade continent enema procedures (ACE) can afford patients an alternative route of enema administration. This study summarized the outcomes of children with idiopathic constipation who receive antegrade enemas (AE) with or without a prior BMP.

METHODS

This was a single institution, retrospective cohort study of children with idiopathic constipation who underwent ACE procedures indicated by different providers from 2015-2020. We categorized the outcomes with AE after the ACE procedure as: "successful outcome" when the AE produced a daily bowel movement, no involuntary bowel movements, and no more fecal impactions, "unsuccessful outcome" was defined when the patient continued having involuntary bowel movements or fecal impaction requiring cleanouts despite a daily AE, and "unnecessary outcome" was defined when the patient was no longer doing AE, but had daily bowel movements, and no involuntary bowel movements or fecal impactions.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight children with idiopathic constipation had an ACE. The most frequent indication for ACE was a failure of medical treatment. The most common medical treatment was polyethylene glycol. Before ACE, 34 (89%) patients did not have a BMP; 18 patients were on rectal enemas and 16 on laxatives. All four with BMP (100%) had a successful rectal enema. After ACE, 12 (31%) patients had successful antegrade enemas, including the four with previous successful BMP with rectal enemas. Twenty patients (52%) had unsuccessful antegrade enemas, and in 6 (15%), the ACE was unnecessary (Fig. 1).

CONCLUSION

Using antegrade enemas without a previously successful formula for rectal enemas has resulted in a high rate of unsuccessful and unnecessary procedures. BMP for children with idiopathic constipation who needs rectal enemas offers a high possibility to find the proper rectal enema recipe and ensures higher rates of successful AE.

Approach to the Adult Colorectal Patient with a History of Pediatric Abdominal Surgery

Children with colorectal diseases often undergo operative management in their youth. As these patients become adult, it is important for surgeons to understand their postoperative anatomy as well as the pathophysiology of their diseases. Here, we present a description of common colorectal diseases of childhood that may have significant impact on patients' presentations as adult. We also discuss the diagnosis and management of conditions that are usually seen early in life but may present during adulthood as well.

Idiopathic Megacolon-Short Review

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic megacolon (IM) is a rare condition with a more or less known etiology, which involves management challenges, especially therapeutic, and both gastroenterology and surgery services. With insufficiently drawn out protocols, but with occasionally formidable complications, the condition management can be difficult for any general surgery team, either as a failure of drug therapy (in the context of a known case, initially managed by a gastroenterologist) or as a surgical emergency (in which the diagnostic surprise leads additional difficulties to the tactical decision), when the speed imposed by the severity of the case can lead to inadequate strategies, with possibly critical consequences.

METHOD

With such a motivation, and having available experience limited by the small number of cases (described by all medical teams concerned with this pathology), the revision of the literature with the update of management landmarks from the surgical perspective of the pathology appears as justified by this article.

RESULTS

If the diagnosis of megacolon is made relatively easily by imaging the colorectal dilation (which is associated with initial and/or consecutive clinical aspects), the establishing of the diagnosis of idiopathic megacolon is based in practice almost exclusively on a principle of exclusion, and after evaluating the absence of some known causes that can lead to the occurrence of these anatomic and clinical changes, mimetically, clinically, and paraclinically, with IM (intramural aganglionosis, distal obstructions, intoxications, etc.). If the etiopathogenic theories, based on an increase in the performance of the arsenal of investigations of the disease, have registered a continuous improvement and an increase of objectivity, unfortunately, the curative surgical treatment options still revolve around the same resection techniques. Moreover, the possibility of developing a form of etiopathogenic treatment seems as remote as ever.

Surgical Interventions for Functional Constipation: An Update

Chronic idiopathic constipation, also known as functional constipation, is defined as difficult and infrequent defecation without an identifiable organic cause. Medical management with laxatives is effective for the majority of constipated children. However there is a subset of patients who may need evaluation by a surgeon. As constipation progresses, it can lead to fecal retention and rectal and sigmoid distension, which impairs normal colorectal motility. Surgical interventions are influenced by the results of: a rectal biopsy, transit studies, the presence of megacolon/megarectum on contrast enema, the degree of soiling/incontinence, anorectal manometry findings, and colonic motility evaluation. In this review, we describe the different surgical options available (intestinal diversion, antegrade enemas, sacral nerve stimulation, colonic resections, and Botulinum toxin injection) and provide guidance on how to choose the best procedure for a given patient.