The Importance of Alternative Diagnostic Modalities in the Diagnosis of Small Bowel Tumors After a Negative Capsule Endoscopy

Discordance Rate and Risk Factor of Other Diagnostic Modalities for Small Bowel Tumors Detected by Device-Assisted Enteroscopy: A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (KASID) Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Despite advances in imaging and endoscopic technology, diagnostic modalities for small bowel tumors are simultaneously performed. We investigated the discrepancy rate between each modality and predictive factors of discrepancy in patients with definite small bowel tumors.

METHODS

Data of patients with definite small bowel tumors who underwent both device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) and computed tomography (CT) were retrieved from web-based enteroscopy registry database in Korea. Predictive risk factors associated with discrepancy were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 998 patients, 210 (21.0%) were diagnosed with small bowel tumor using DAE, in 193 patients with definite small bowel tumor, DAE and CT were performed. Of these patients, 12 (6.2%) showed discrepancy between examinations. Among 49 patients who underwent DAE and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) examination, 13 (26.5%) showed discrepancy between examinations. No significant independent risk factors were associated with concordance between DAE and CT in multivariate logistic regression analysis among the patients. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, red blood cell transfusion was negatively associated with concordance between DAE and VCE in patients with small bowel tumor (odds ratio, 0.163; 95% confidence interval, 0.026 to 1.004; p=0.050).

CONCLUSIONS

For small bowel tumors, the discrepancy rate between DAE and CT was 6.2%, and 26.5% between DAE and VCE. Despite developments in cross-sectional imaging (VCE and DAE modalities), discrepancies still exist. For small bowel bleeding that require significant transfusion while showing insignificant VCE findings, DAE should be considered as the next diagnostic approach, considering the possibility of missed small bowel tumor.

Development and validation of a new scoring system to determine the necessity of small-bowel endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is the recommended first-line procedure for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). However, a method for predicting the necessity of subsequent double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) has not been established.

AIMS

We aimed to develop a new scoring system that predicts the necessity of DBE in OGIB.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in 330 patients who underwent SBCE for OGIB at Nagoya University Hospital. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to either a development or a validation dataset. The former was used to construct a prediction scoring system to assess the necessity of DBE using independent predictors selected by logistic regression. The diagnostic yield of the prediction model was assessed using the validation dataset.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the development dataset identified OGIB type, blood transfusion, and SBCE findings as independent predictors of the necessity of DBE. A prediction score gave an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.77. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value at a cutoff ≥2.5 points were 72.5%, 74.6%, 72.6%, and 74.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our scoring system may aid clinicians in deciding when to recommend DBE for patients with OGIB.

Clinical outcomes of negative small-bowel capsule endoscopy for small-bowel bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Small-bowel bleeding is the primary indication for capsule endoscopy (CE). Many experts advocate a "watch-and-wait" policy in negative CE. This meta-analysis examines the odds of rebleeding after negative index CE and the impact on long-term follow-up.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search identified articles examining the rebleeding rate after negative CE. Demographic and clinical information with emphasis on outcomes was retrieved, pooled, and analyzed. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I² statistic. A random effects model was used as the pooling method because of high heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool. The primary outcome evaluated was the pooled odds ratios (ORs) for rebleeding after a negative CE for obscure GI bleeding (OGIB).

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies with 3657 patients were included. The pooled rate of rebleeding after negative CE was .19 (95% CI, .14-.25; P < .0001). The pooled OR of rebleeding was .59 (95% CI, .37-.95; P < .001). The effect was more pronounced in studies with a short follow-up (OR, .47; 95% CI, .24-.94; P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in rebleeding after CE for occult and overt OGIB. Prospective studies showed a lower OR of rebleeding of .24 (95% CI, .08-.73; P = .01). Most studies were high quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis shows that negative CE provides adequate evidence of a subsequently low risk of rebleeding. Such patients can therefore be safely managed with watchful waiting. However, patients who rebleed after 2 years may need to be investigated for a new source of blood loss.

Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in Portugal

BACKGROUND

Device-assisted enteroscopies (DAEs) are recent endoscopic techniques that enable direct endoscopic small-bowel evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to evaluate the implementation of DAEs in Portugal and assess the main indications, diagnoses, diagnostic yield, therapeutic yield and complication rate.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective series using a national Web-based survey on behalf of the Portuguese Small-Bowel Study Group. Participants were asked to fill out two online databases regarding procedural data, indications, diagnoses, endoscopic therapy and complications using prospectively collected institutional data records.

RESULTS

A total of eight centers were enrolled in the survey, corresponding to 1411 DAEs. The most frequent indications were obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), inflammatory bowel disease and small-bowel tumors. The pooled diagnostic yield was 63%. A relation between the diagnostic yield and the indications was clear, with a diagnostic yield for OGIB of 69% (p = 0.02) with a 52% therapeutic yield. Complications occurred in 1.2%, with a major complication rate of 0.57%. Perforations occurred in four patients (0.28%).

CONCLUSION

DAEs are safe and effective procedures, with complication rates of 1.2%, the most serious of which is perforation. Most procedures are performed in the setting of OGIB. Diagnostic and therapeutic yields are dependent on the indication, hence appropriate patient selection is crucial.

What is the long term safety of a negative capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There are contradictory findings regarding long-term outcome in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and negative capsule endoscopy. Factors associated with rebleeding after a negative videocapsule are not entirely known.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the rebleeding rate between negative and positive capsule endoscopy patients and to identify predictive factors for rebleeding in patients with negative findings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding referred to a single center over a period of 5 years were identified. After exclusion of patients with a follow time < 6 months, 173 patients were included. Clinical information was retrospectively collected from medical records. Rebleeding was defined as evidence of melena/hematochezia, a drop in hemoglobin of ≥ 2 g/dL, or the need for transfusion 30 days after the index episode.

RESULTS

The mean age was 61.7 years and 60% were female. The median follow up time was 27 months. Most patients were referred for occult gastrointestinal bleeding (67.1%) while 32.9% were referred for overt bleeding. More than 50% of the patients had negative capsule endoscopy. The rebleeding rate in negative capsule endoscopy is 16%, with a mean follow-up time of 25.8 months and is significantly lower than positive capsule endoscopy (16% vs. 30.2%, p = 0.02). Rebleeding after negative capsule endoscopy is higher in patients who need more transfusions of packet red blood cells before capsule endoscopy (3.0 vs. 0.9, p = 0.024) and have overt bleeding (46% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.03). In 53% of these patients, rebleeding occurs > 12 months after a negative capsule endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and a negative capsule endoscopy had a significantly lower rebleeding rate and can be safely followed. However, a higher transfusion of red blood cells previous to capsule endoscopy and an overt bleeding are associated with a higher rebleeding. So, it is reasonable to consider that these patients may benefit of at least one year of follow-up.