Sequential application of non-pharmacological interventions reduces the severity of labour pain, delays use of pharmacological analgesia, and improves some obstetric outcomes: a randomised trial

Pharmacological pain relief and women´s birth experience: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in health care systems worldwide for maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience. The World Health Organisation (WHO) launched a recommendation 2018 regarding women's right to equal and fair intrapartum care, where the importance of pharmacological pain relief was highlighted. Our objective with this systematic review was to summarize and assess the current knowledge regarding the impact of obstetric pharmacological pain relief on maternal satisfaction with childbirth.

METHODS

The databases Pub Med, Cochrane, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched for studies in the English language published after 1998 that investigated the effect of pharmacological pain relief on women´s birth experience after vaginal delivery. Studies reporting assessments of subjective satisfaction with childbirth in women planned for vaginal delivery were selected. The results were summarized narratively. For studies where comparable association measures were available, forest plots are presented. Due to heterogeneity of research questions and indirectness of measuring instruments, no meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 15,136 women were included from 18 studies. Two randomized controlled studies, nine cohort studies, six cross-sectional studies and one case control study, all had a moderate or high risk of bias. The studies used inconsistent methods to measure outcomes; therefore, no conclusion could be drawn regarding a possible correlation between pharmacological pain relief and overall birth experience.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review could not show a correlation between pharmacological pain relief and women´s experiences of childbirth, mainly due to large heterogeneity between studies. To evaluate pain relief during labour and improve women´s childbirth experiences, high-quality research is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in PROSPERO (prospective register of systematic reviews) 18 Dec 2018 (ID 116744).

Women's experiences of waterbirth: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND

Childbirth is a major event in a woman's life, shaped by various factors including the individual's circumstances, the birth process, the care provided, social support, and immediate post-birth experiences. Although waterbirth has become increasingly popular in recent years, research on women's experience remains limited. This review aims to synthesize evidence on women's experiences of waterbirths to inform clinical guidelines, support personalized care, and identify priorities for future research.

METHODS

This study was a systematic review, with searches conducted across three databases (CINAHL, Scopus, and PubMed) covering 2013 to 2023. A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria, and the data were analyzed through a narrative synthesis approach.

FINDINGS

Eight categories were identified that capture women's experiences with waterbirth. Women who give birth in water often feel a strong sense of control, describing the experience as empowering, intimate, and relaxing. They value the ease of changing positions in the birthing pool, although some find the pool's design challenging and occasionally uncomfortable. Overall, water is widely regarded as an effective pain relief method and a natural, positive childbirth option, though it can also evoke negative emotions. The roles of both the partner and midwife are essential, and women generally report positive experiences following a waterbirth.

CONCLUSION

Most women were satisfied with waterbirth. However, further research is needed to understand waterbirth's impact on women's psychological well-being, as well as the perspectives of partners and midwives. Additionally, cultural perceptions and effective ways to provide comprehensive information to support expectant mothers in their decision-making require further exploration.

[Systematic review of individual biopsychosocial aspects of interventions during a physiological birth in primiparous women]

The birth process involves biopsychosocial aspects, the identification of which has been little researched. This systematic review aims to identify biopsychosocial aspects of interventions during physiological birth in first-time mothers and to assess the effectiveness of these interventions on birth outcomes.A systematic guideline search resulted in the definition of a physiological birth of first-time mothers with a singleton from the cephalic position at 37+0 to 42+0 weeks' gestation. A systematic literature search assessed intervention studies for evidence quality using the GRADE methodology. Structured content analysis according to Mayring was used to identify biopsychosocial aspects.18 bio-organic, psychological and sociological aspects were identified from 20 studies. The quality of evidence was mostly low to very low due to inadequate reporting of fetal and maternal outcomes and characteristics. Moderate confidence was shown for midwifery care and aromatherapy in increasing spontaneous labor, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in improving satisfaction, subjective pain perception and APGAR score. Identified biopsychosocial aspects enable a multidimensional assessment of physiological birth and could lead to a biopsychosocial care model. Insufficient quality of evidence does not allow the derivation of specific interventions. Studies in obstetrics should use defined endpoints and characteristics to improve the quality of evidence.

Investigation of the effects of peanut ball during labor: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Peanut balls, a specific type of positioning aid used during labor, have gained attention for their potential to enhance maternal comfort and facilitate fetal positioning. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of peanut balls on the duration of the first stage of labor, the rate of cesarean section, and maternal satisfaction.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was carried out employing electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The search included articles published from inception to 11 October 2023 with no language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies were considered for inclusion if they met the following criteria: participants were pregnant women in labor; intervention involved using a peanut ball during labor; and primary outcome included duration of labor, and the rate of cesarean section and maternal satisfaction were secondary outcomes. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool. Results were synthesized using Review Manager software (RevMan version 5.1), employing both fixed-effect and random-effects models as appropriate, and results were presented as risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences and standardized mean differences for continuous outcomes. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADEpro GDT (Guideline Development Tool).

RESULTS

Eight studies including 1352 laboring women met the criteria to be included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the women with epidural analgesia who used the peanut ball, experienced a shortened duration of the first stage of labor by 52.98 min, which was statistically significant (p=0.003). Heterogeneity evidence was not found among the included studies (χ2=6.83, p=0.15, I2=41%). It was also shown that the risk ratio of cesarean section in women who used peanut balls during childbirth was significantly lower than the control group (RR=0.74; 95% CI: 0.60-0.91, p=0.0004) (χ2=5.72, p=0.45, I2=0%). Compared to the control group, the women in the peanut ball group were found to have a higher satisfaction level, which was statistically significant (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The peanut birth ball reduces the first stage of labor duration, and lowers cesarean rates in women with epidural analgesia. While effective and non-invasive, the findings are limited by the risk of bias in some included studies.

Physical therapy assistance in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Physical therapy assistance during labor may provide physical and emotional support to the expectant mother. Through specific techniques, physical therapists may help alleviate pain, improve mobility, and facilitate a safer and more comfortable delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the potential benefits and risks of physical therapy assistance during labor.

METHODS

A search was conducted in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, PEDro, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases, with no restrictions on dates or language. The terms "Physical therapy assistance" and "Labor" were used. Randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials comparing a group receiving physical therapy assistance during labor with a control group receiving standard care were included. The Cochrane tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the Risk of Bias, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Quantitative analysis was performed through meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 984 pregnant women were included. There was an increase frequency of vaginal deliveries (RR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17; 9 studies; I2, 2%; T2, 0.00; p = 0.42) and a reduction in cesarean sections (RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.35, 0.76; 9 studies; I2, 0%; T2, 0.00; p = 0.65) for the physical therapy group, findings based on high-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD: -99.01 min, 95% CI -153.35, -44.66; 7 studies; I2, 88%; T2, 4546.40; p = 0.00001), duration of the second stage (MD: - 11.29 min, 95% CI -18.94, -3.64; 6 studies; I2, 53%; T2, 45.01; p = 0.06) and frequence of perineal lacerations (RR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.25, 0.96; 4 studies; I2, 0%; T2, 0.00; p = 0.70) for the intervention group, findings based on moderate-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in pain by 1.46 points on the Visual Analog Scale (MD: -1.46, 95% CI -2.52, -0.41; 7 studies; I2, 100%; T2, 1.90; p < 0.00001), findings based on low-certainty evidence, a decrease in analgesic use (RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.83, 0.99; 2 studies; I2, 0%; T2, 0.00; p = 0.44), and maternal anxiety by 7.65 points on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (MD: -7.65, 95% CI -11.27, -4.03; 2 studies; I2, 88%; T2, 5.99; p = 0.005) for the intervention group. There was no difference in the other maternal and fetal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Physical therapy assistance during labor provides a number of benefits to the mother.

The effect of acupressure and massage on labor pain and birth satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the effect of acupressure and massage used for the management of labor pain in the latent, active, and transition phases of the first stage of labor on labor pain and birth satisfaction.

METHODS

The study was conducted with 66 pregnant women who met the sampling criteria and participated voluntarily at a public hospital in Nicosia. The participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a massage group, an acupressure group, or a control group. Participants in the massage group received 10 min of sacral massage during contraction and 10 min of endorphin massage during rest, for a total of 30 min of massage per phase. Participants in the acupressure group received 3 min of acupressure to the LI 4 point at the same dilation intervals, when the contraction was most intense. The control group received no intervention. Pain perceived by the pregnant woman was evaluated with the Visual Comparison Scale (VAS) at the beginning and end of each phase. Postpartum, the Birth Satisfaction Scale was applied.

RESULTS

Massage application was found to be more effective in reducing labor pain than acupressure or the control group. Massage and acupressure did not negatively affect APGAR scores. The lowest oxytocin use was found in the massage group. The group with the highest birth satisfaction scores was also the massage group.

CONCLUSION

Massage application is more effective than acupressure application in reducing labor pain and increasing birth satisfaction.

Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Showers and Bathtubs for Pain Management and Labor Outcomes-A Retrospective Cohort Study

Hydrotherapy, including the use of therapeutic showers and bathtubs, has been studied for its potential benefits in labor pain management. Previous research has indicated that hydrotherapy can alleviate pain, but comparative studies between therapeutic showers and bathtubs are scarce. Objective: This study aims to compare the effects of therapeutic showers and bathtubs on pain perception, labor duration, use of epidural analgesia, and maternal and neonatal outcomes during labor. Methods: A total of 124 pregnant women were included in this study. Participants were divided into two groups: those who used a therapeutic shower and those who used a bathtub during labor. Pain levels were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Labor duration, use of epidural analgesia, types of delivery, maternal outcomes (postpartum hemorrhage, perineal status, maternal hypotension, fever, and breastfeeding), and neonatal outcomes (APGAR scores, fetal heart rate, complications, and neonatal unit admissions) were recorded and analyzed. Results: Both the therapeutic shower and the bathtub effectively reduced pain perception, with the bathtub showing a greater reduction in VAS scores. The therapeutic shower group experienced a significantly shorter labor duration compared to the bathtub group. The majority of participants in both groups did not require epidural analgesia, with no significant differences between the groups. There were no significant differences in the types of delivery. Maternal outcomes indicated a lower incidence of perineal tears and episiotomies in the therapeutic shower group. Neonatal outcomes, including APGAR scores and fetal heart rate, were similar between the groups, with no significant differences in complications or neonatal unit admissions. Conclusions: Both therapeutic showers and bathtubs are effective for pain relief during labor, with the bathtub showing a higher reduction in pain intensity. The therapeutic shower is associated with a shorter labor duration and a lower incidence of perineal tears and episiotomies. Both methods are safe for neonatal well-being, making hydrotherapy a viable non-pharmacological option for pain management in labor. However, the therapeutic shower may offer additional benefits in terms of labor duration and maternal outcomes.

Influence of non-pharmacological methods on duration of labor: a systematic review

The article aims to verify the influence of MNFs on the duration of the birth process. A systematic review was carried out in the MEDLINE, Web of Science and LILACS databases, through a combination of terms that cover the topic addressed, from 1996 to 2021/April. The Excel spreadsheet was used to collect data to extract information regarding each selected article, in turn, data analysis included the evaluation and classification of quality, reliability and risk of bias, thus, the following tools were used: Cochrane RoB 2, Checklist and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Warm bath, walking, exercises with a birthing ball, breathing techniques, supine position, acupuncture, acupressure and water birth reduced labor time. While spontaneous pushing, massage and immersion baths prolonged labor. Non-pharmacological methods capable of reducing the duration of labor were hot/warm shower, walking, birth ball exercises, breathing techniques, maternal mobility, dorsal position, acupuncture, acupressure and water birth, as well. associated applied techniques such as hot/warm bath, ball exercises and lumbosacral massage, as well as immersion bath, ball exercises, aromatherapy, vertical postures and maternal mobility with alternating vertical postures, shortened the birth time.

Impact of shared decision-making on women's childbirth preferences: A cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Midwives provide counselling for birth plans (BPs) to women during prenatal care; however, the impact of individualised BP counselling interventions based on shared decision-making (SDM) regarding women's preferences is unknown.

METHODS

This randomised cluster trial included four primary healthcare units. Midwives provided BP counselling based on SDM to women in the intervention group (IG) during prenatal care along with a handout about evidence-based recommendations. Women in the control group (CG) received standard BP counselling from midwives. The main outcome was preference changes concerning BPs.

RESULTS

A total of 461 (95.5 %) pregnant women received BP counselling (IG, n = 247; CG, n = 214). Women in the IG changed their BP preferences for 13 items compared with those in the CG. These items were: using an unique space during birth (81.1 % vs 51.6 %; p < 0.001), option for light graduation (63 % vs 44.7 %; p < 0.001), listening to music (57.3 % vs 43.6 %; p = 0.006), drinking fluids during labour (84.6 % vs 93.6 %; p = 0.005), continuous monitoring (59 % vs 37.8 %; p < 0.001); desire for natural childbirth (36.6 % vs 25 %; p = 0.014), epidural analgesia (55.1 % vs 43.6 %; p = 0.023); breathing techniques (65.2 % vs 50.5 %; p = 0.003), massage (74.9 % vs 55.3 %; p < 0.001); birthing ball use (81.9 % vs 56.9 %; p < 0.001), spontaneous pushing (49.3 % vs 28.7 %; p < 0.001), choosing birth position (69.6 % vs 41.5 %) and delayed umbilical cord clamping (67.8 % vs 44.1 %; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SDM counselling, together with a handout about evidence-based recommendations on childbirth and newborn care, produced more changes in women's preferences expressed in the BP than standard counselling.

Nonpharmacological pain relief for labour pain: knowledge, attitude, and barriers among obstetric care providers

Background

Labor pain is considered the worst pain in a woman's life. Hence, pain control should be essential to labor management at any level. There is scarce information, and there are gaps regarding the knowledge, attitude, and barriers to the utilization of nonpharmacological approaches for pain relief in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, the current study aims to evaluate nonpharmacological pain relief (NPPR)-related knowledge, attitudes, and barriers among obstetric care providers in Najran, Saudi Arabia.

Methods

A cross-sectional analytical study was performed at maternity departments in Maternal and Children Hospital (MCH), Najran, Saudi Arabia, from April 1 to May 26 2023. The study involved 186 obstetric care providers (OPCs), physicians (19), nurses (144), and midwives (23). A structured self-reported questionnaire was used to collect data and involves five main sections: demographic data, work-related data, nonpharmacological pain relief-related attitude, perceived barriers, and knowledge quiz. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) along with 95% CI was estimated to determine the factors associated with nonpharmacological pain relief-related knowledge and attitude using multivariate analysis in the binary logistic regression.

Results

Over three-quarters (79%) of obstetric care providers had adequate knowledge of nonpharmacological pain relief methods. The majority (85.5%) of the participants had a positive attitude toward NPPR in labour pain management, with the mean scores ranging from 3.55-4.23 for all sub-items. Obstetric care providers acknowledged that patient belief, lack of time, and workload were the strongest barriers to offering nonpharmacological pain relief methods for labour pain 67.6%, 64.5%, and 61.3%, respectively. In binary logistic regression analysis, the in-service training related to nonpharmacological pain relief (AOR = 5.871 (2.174-15.857), p = 0.000), (AOR = 3.942 (1.926-11.380), p = 0.013) and years of work experience (AOR = 1.678 (1.080-2.564), p = 0.019), (AOR = 1.740 (1.188-2.548), p = 0.003) were significantly associated with obstetric care providers' knowledge and attitudes regarding nonpharmacological pain relief (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion

Although most OPCs have adequate knowledge and a positive attitude regarding NPPR, they need motivational strategies to enhance their utilization. In addition, an effort should be made to decrease OPCs' workload to provide more time for NPPR application and patient education. Training courses and in-service training can play an important role in enhancing NPPR knowledge and attitude and, consequently, its application. Also, in each working unit, the policymakers should provide clear guidelines and policies that enhance and control the utilization of NPPR.

The Farver-Campos Labor Coping Scale as a Replacement for the 10-Point Pain Scale for Labor

The 10-point pain scale was developed to avoid undertreated pain in the hospital setting. Developed in a Veterans Administration hospital for medical-surgical patients in 2003, the 10-point pain scale was adopted in health care as part of the "pain as the fifth vital sign" initiative. The pain scale was implemented in maternity care as part of a general hospital initiative. Assessing coping is more appropriate to the labor process than focusing on pain or its avoidance. The Farver-Campos Labor Coping Scale is evidence-based and promotes vaginal birth and personal labor care by guiding nurses and laboring women through a number of coping options. The scale is an appropriate tool to replace the 10-point pain scale in the maternity care setting.

A Qualitative Study on Postpartum Women Experienced Various Pain Throughout the Perinatal Period Based on the Thrive Model

Aim

This study aims to thoroughly explore to comprehensively examine the diverse types and subjective experiences of pain in postpartum women throughout perinatal period, aiming to deepen understanding and support the development of precise pain management strategies in nursing care.

Design

A descriptive qualitative study.

Methods

Between August and November 2022, postpartum women attending outpatient clinics at a tertiary level A hospital were selected as participants. The study followed the framework of the THRIVE model and utilized a phenomenological method for qualitative research. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 postpartum women, and the data were analyzed using the Colaizzi 7-step analysis method.

Results

Thematic analysis revealed that different postpartum women exhibited diverse perceptions of their own pain experiences. Three themes were identified to describe the pain encountered by postpartum women: (1) Experiencing pain is complex (including experiencing multiple kinds of pain, individual differences in pain, and pain is variable), (2) Double perceptions of pain (negative effects of pain and positive energy for perceiving pain), and (3) Fighting pain requires active support (active outside support and construct a positive self-coping style).

Conclusion

This study provides a comprehensive overview of perinatal pain management in postpartum women, offering recommendations for accurate pain understanding and management. Healthcare professionals should be vigilant about maternal pain changes and individual experiences, implement targeted measures and support, aid in alleviating psychological burdens, boost maternal confidence in childbirth, and enhance postpartum quality of life.

Patient or Public Contribution

In this study, interviews were conducted in the hospital outpatient department, and the participants included in this study participated in the interviews to provide support for the implementation of this subject.

Quantitative cardiac autonomic outcomes of hydrotherapy in women during the first stage of labor

Introduction

Most hydrotherapy studies during childbirth report findings related to pain using a widespread set of subjective measures. In this study, ECG biomarkers as quantitative cardiac autonomic outcomes were used to assess the effects of warm shower hydrotherapy on laboring women during the first stage of labor.

Methods

This was a prospective single-blind cohort study on stage I delivering women. Their cardiac autonomic function was assessed using heart rate variability (HRV) measures during a deep breathing test using point-of-care testing comprised of an HRV scanner system with wireless ECG enabling real-time data analysis and visualization. Labor pain and anxiety were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VASP) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). A total of 105 pregnant women in the first stage of labor who received warm shower hydrotherapy, intravenous analgesia (scopolamine + sodium dipyrone), or spinal anesthetic (bupivacaine + morphine) were enrolled.

Results

In women during the first stage of labor, parasympathetic modulation reflected through RMSSD (root mean square of successive RR interval differences) was significantly reduced by hydrotherapy and intravenous analgesia (before vs. after mean rank diff. 35.73 and 65.93, respectively, p < 0.05). Overall HRV (SDNN, standard deviation of RR intervals) was significantly decreased only by intravenous analgesia (before vs. after mean rank diff. 65.43, p < 0.001). Mean heart rate was significantly increased by intravenous analgesia, while spinal anesthesia reduced it, and hydrotherapy did not alter it (before vs. after mean rank diff. -49.35*, 70.38*, -24.20 ^NS , respectively, *p < 0.05, ^NS not significant).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that warm shower therapy may impact the sympathovagal balance via parasympathetic withdrawal in women during the initial stage of labor. The findings of this study provide quantitative support for using warm shower hydrotherapy during labor via point-of-care testing. The dependability of hydrotherapy as a non-pharmacological treatment is linked to the completion of more clinical research demonstrating quantitative evidence via outcome biomarkers to support indications on stress and birth progress.

Applying a physiotherapy protocol to women during the active phase of labor improves obstetrical outcomes: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Labor is a physiological process triggered by mechanical and hormonal events that promote uterine contractions to expel the fetus.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a nonpharmacologic childbirth care protocol in women in the active phase of labor in improving obstetrical and perinatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis. A total of 80 low-risk primigravida women at the end of pregnancy admitted at the beginning of the active phase of labor participated in the study. The participants were divided into an experimental group (n=40) and a control group (n=40). Women in the experimental group received 4 interventions: ambulation at 4 to 6 cm of cervical dilation, alternation of maternal postures, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at 6 to 7 cm, and a warm shower bath at >7 cm. The control group received only routine obstetrical care during labor. The parturient could request pharmacologic analgesia at any time during the study. The main outcome measures were the duration of the active phase of the first stage of labor, the duration of the expulsive phase of labor, and the prevalence of labor dystocia as assessed by the partograph. The researchers collected other maternal and neonatal data from official birth records.

RESULTS

The parturients who received the nonpharmacologic protocol had a shorter active phase of the first stage of labor (444 minutes in the control group and 373 minutes in the experimental group; P=.02), presented rupture of membranes later in labor (7 cm in the control group and 8 cm in the experimental group; P<.01), requested pharmacologic analgesia with more significant cervical dilation (5 cm in the control group and 8 cm in the experimental group; P<.01), requested fewer additional doses of analgesics, and had lower labor dystocia rates than the patients in the control group. In addition, there was no difference in other maternal and perinatal variables between the control group and the experimental group.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a sequential nonpharmacologic protocol composed of ambulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with change of upright positions, and warm shower bath has the potential to reduce labor pain, as reflected in decreased and delayed use of pharmacologic analgesia and reduced duration of the active phase of labor and dystocia rates. Maternity hospitals should provide this protocol, and women should be encouraged to request this childbirth care protocol.

Nonpharmacological labor pain management methods and risk of cesarean birth: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Nonpharmacological labor pain management methods (NPLPMM) are noninvasive, low-cost practices that may play a role in reducing the rates of unnecessary cesarean birth. We aimed to evaluate whether the NPLPMM is associated with the mode of birth.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study with clinical records of all women admitted for birth from January 2013 to December 2017. Records of women who had spontaneous labor or received induction or augmentation of labor during hospitalization were eligible for the study. We estimated the risk ratios for cesarean birth in general linear models using the Poisson regression with adjustments for the following variables: age, ethnicity, schooling, parity, gestational age, previous cesarean birth, spontaneous labor before admission, or induction/augmentation of labor.

RESULTS

Within the total of 3,391 medical records, 40.1% had the use of a nonpharmacological labor pain management method registered. Cesarean rate among the study population was 44.2%. The use of NPLPMM decreased the risk of cesarean birth by 78% (OR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.19-0.26). History of a previous cesarean birth (RR = 2.63; 95% CI 2.35-2.64), the lack of use of NPLPMM (RR = 2.46; 95% CI 2.22-2.72), and primiparity (RR = 2.09; 95% CI 1.86-2.34) were the strongest risk factors for cesarean birth in the cohort.

DISCUSSION

The use of NPLPMM may be an effective strategy to reduce unnecessary cesarean birth. Further studies to identify the efficacy of each method may help health professionals to offer more appropriate methods at different stages of labor.

The effect of delivery ball and warm shower on the childbirth experience of nulliparous women: a randomized controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Childbirth is a unique experience that affects women's life. Midwives can play an effective role in creating positive birth experiences for women using non-pharmacological and supportive methods. Accordingly, this study aims to determine the effect of delivery balls and warm showers on childbirth experiences of primiparous women.

METHODS

This clinical trial was conducted on primiparous pregnant women who referred to the Motazedi Hospital in Kermanshah, Iran. Sampling was done from eligible individuals by a continuous method, and pregnant women were assigned to the three groups of delivery balls plus warm showers or A (n = 35), delivery balls or B (n = 35), and control or C (n = 35). The use of the ball at the dilation of 4 cm was similar in the two groups of A and B, but the first group used a warm shower at the dilatation of 7 cm as well. The control group also received routine delivery care. Besides, demographic information forms consisting of the pregnancy history and some information about the mother and her infant were completed. Additionally, childbirth experience questionnaires (CEQ) were completed by the women two hours after childbirth. The analysis of intervention effects was performed as per-protocol analysis.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference in the mean score of the childbirth experience between the two groups of A and C (p = 0.001) after the intervention as well as between the groups of B and C (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The use of delivery balls and warm showers was effective in creating a positive childbirth experience. To create a positive childbirth experience in mothers, the use of both interventions (delivery balls and warm showers) is recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

TCTR 20200408002 . Prospectively registered on March 21, 2020.

Obstetrics care providers attitude and utilization of non-pharmacological labor pain management in Harari regional state health facilities, Ethiopia

Background

In a woman’s life, labor pain is the most severe pain that they have ever faced. In Ethiopia, the provision of pain relief in labor is often neglected. Furthermore, evidence strongly urged that further research is needed on non-pharmacological labor pain management. Therefore, obstetrics care providers’ attitudes and utilization of non-pharmacological labor pain management need to be assessed.

Method

A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from May 20 to June 10, 2021, in Harari regional state health facilities, Ethiopia. All obstetric caregivers in Harari regional state health facilities were included in the study. A structured questionnaire adapted from the previous studies was used to collect data. The data was entered into Epi-data version 3.1 statistical software. Statistical analysis was carried out by using SPSS for windows version 22. Multivariate linear regression analysis was employed to determine the association between independent variables and the outcome variable.

Result

The overall utilization of non-pharmacological labor pain relief methods was 59.3% [(95% CI (53.9,63.4)]. Three hundred five (65.5%) of the study participants had unfavorable attitudes. Females compared to males (β = − 0.420; 95% CI: − 0.667, − 0.173), clinical experience (β = − 0.201; 95% CI: − 0.268, − 0.134), knowledge sum score (β =0.227: 95%; CI: 0.18,0.247), and attitude sum score (β = 0.376; 95% CI: 0.283, 0.47) were showed significantly association with utilization of non-pharmacological labor pain management.

Conclusion

The overall utilization of non-pharmacological labor pain relief methods was relatively good compared to other studies done in Ethiopia but all women’s need for labor relief methods should not be ignored. In this study sex of the respondents, clinical experience, individual preference, attitude and knowledge were factors associated with the utilization of non-pharmacological labor pain management. All stake holds need to work together to improve the attitude of health providers and to increase the utilization of non-pharmacologic labor pain management.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04717-9.

Pregnant women’s knowledge of non-pharmacological techniques for pain relief during childbirth

INTRODUCTION

The objective of the study was to assess knowledge of pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy on non-pharmacological techniques for pain relief during labor and childbirth.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care facility of the University of Campinas, Brazil. The participants were 171 pregnant women, aged 18–35 years with 36 or more weeks of a singleton pregnancy. Participants responded to a questionnaire with data about sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics, knowledge on non-pharmacological techniques for pain relief during childbirth, the source of the information on these techniques, practice of physical activity and occurrence of pain during pregnancy. Parous women responded on the use of non-pharmacological techniques for pain relief during childbirth in previous deliveries. Multiple regression analysis with stepwise criteria of selection of variables was used to identify variables significantly associated with knowledge of non-pharmacological techniques for pain relief during childbirth.

RESULTS

A total of 165 (96.5%) participants reported knowledge on at least one non-pharmacological technique; 87.1% on the use of a warm shower during labor for pain relief, 80.7% on the use of the birthing ball, and 74.8% on breathing techniques. There were no significant differences between nulliparous and parous women. The main source of information reported was the Internet. Multivariate analysis showed that pregnant women who had pain during pregnancy reported more knowledge on the use of warm showers during labor (OR=2.64; 95% CI: 1.03–6.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Most women had knowledge of at least one non-pharmacological technique for pain relief during childbirth.

Effects of the addition of transcutaneous electrical stimulation to non-pharmacological measures in labor pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Labor, although natural and physiological, is a period that can be marked by stress, pain, anxiety, suffering, fear, and anguish for a woman. Thus, non-pharmacological methods that reduce pain during labor are important to allow a better experience without the use of medications. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of non-pharmacological pain relief methods, added or not to the application of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS), on pain, satisfaction with the childbirth, duration of labor, and newborn conditions.

METHODS

This is a randomized controlled clinical trial, with a non-probabilistic convenience sample, composed of women in the first active stage of labor, admitted to a public institution. The parturients will be divided into 3 groups: group 1 (n = 36) composed of parturients who will have continuous support and will be encouraged to walk, adopting different positions with the use of the Swiss ball and receiving back massage for 30 min; group 2 (n = 36) composed of parturients who will also have continuous support and will be encouraged to walk, adopt different positions using the Swiss ball, and will receive the application of TENS for 30 min; and group 3 (n = 36) composed of parturients who will have continuous support and will be encouraged to walk, adopting different positions with the use of the Swiss ball, and will receive placebo TENS application for 30 min. The outcomes evaluated in the study will be pain intensity assessed by the visual analog scale of pain applied before, immediately after, and 30 min and 1 h after the interventions; Experience and Satisfaction with Childbirth Questionnaire (QESP) applied 12 to 24 h after delivery; and data regarding delivery (type of delivery, total duration of labor, and possible obstetric complications) and neonate (weight, height, possible complications, Apgar score in the first and fifth minutes).

DISCUSSION

With this research, it is expected to understand the effects of the intervention through TENS electrostimulation added to other non-pharmacological methods for pain management during labor.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC) RBR-68kh6j . Registered on March 17, 2020.

Fisioterapia em obstetrícia pelos olhos das gestantes: um estudo qualitativo

Resumo Introdução: A fisioterapia em saúde da mulher é uma área que surgiu com o objetivo de promover e manter a saúde física e emocional do início ao final da gestação, exercendo um trabalho preventivo para os possíveis agravos que venham a ocorrer durante a gestação, parto e puerpério. O acesso ao conhecimento das gestantes sobre a atuação do fisioterapeuta na área de obstetrícia vem aumentando a cada dia e isso pode contribuir para uma procura por profissionais capacitados. Objetivo: Analisar a percepção das gestantes sobre a atuação da fisioterapia em obstetrícia. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo com abordagem qualitativa, realizado no centro Materno Infantil, em Capanema, PR, configurado na forma de entrevista semiestruturada. Utilizou-se análise do conteúdo por meio do método de Bardin para categorizar os eixos temáticos. Resultados: Foram incluídas sete gestantes com idade entre 18 e 24 anos (57%), 23-32 semanas de gestação (42%), multigestas (71%), com ensino médio (42%) e renda de 1 a 3 salários mínimos (86%). Verificou-se que o contato com a fisioterapia é somente imaginável, porque nenhuma das participantes do estudo acessou esse desdobramento das políticas de saúde da mulher gestante. As gestantes afirmaram que o profissional de fisioterapia atua promovendo a diminuição da dor durante o trabalho de parto, porém não possuem conhecimento sobre como o fisioterapeuta atua no puerpério. Conclusão: Conclui-se que é necessário ampliar a informação sobre a atuação do fisioterapeuta durante o pré-natal, parto e pós-parto.

Physiotherapy in obstetrics through the eyes of pregnant women: a qualitative study

Abstract Introduction: Physiotherapy in women's health emerged with the aim of promoting and maintaining physical and emotional health from the beginning to the end of pregnancy, through preventive measures against possible injuries that may occur during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum. Access to knowledge about obstetric physiotherapy among pregnant women is increasing, which may contribute to a search for trained professionals. Objective: To analyze the perception of pregnant women about obstetric physiotherapy. Methods: This is a qualitative study carried out at the Materno Infantil Center, in Capanema, Parana state (PR), using a semistructured interview. Content analysis used the Bardin method to categorize the thematic axes. Results: Seven pregnant women aged between 18-24 years (57%), 23-32 weeks of gestation (42%), multiparous (71%), with secondary education (42%) and income between 1-3 monthly minimum wages (86 %) were included in the study. It was found that participants’ perception of physiotherapy was inaccurate, because none of the women had accessed this treatment. The women stated that physiotherapists reduce labor pain, but they have no knowledge of how these professionals work in the postpartum. Conclusion: It is concluded that it is necessary to increase information on the contribution of physiotherapists during prenatal care, delivery and postpartum.

Comparison the effect of Swedish massage and interferential electrical stimulation on labor pain and childbirth experience in primiparous women: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Since mothers are more inclined toward non-pharmacological labor pain management methods, this study aimed to compare the effect of interferential electrical stimulation (IES) and Swedish massage (SM) on labor pain and childbirth experience (primary outcomes) and childbirth satisfaction, duration of active phase and side effects (secondary outcomes) in primiparous women.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial was performed on 90 primiparous women. Participants were randomly assigned into three groups through the block randomization method. The SM group received two massage techniques of effleurage and petrissage, on T10-L1 and S2-S4 at cervical dilatation of 4 and 8-10 cm. The IES group received electrical stimulation in a similar way to SM group, with a base frequency of 4000 Hz and a pulse frequency of 80-120 Hz by a physiotherapist. Control group received only routine care.

RESULTS

The mean pain was significantly lower in the SM group (adjusted mean difference (AMD) - 0.86; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) - 1.60 to - 0.11) and the IES group (AMD - 0.95; 95% CI - 1.70 to - 0.21) compared to the control group. The mean score of childbirth experience was significantly higher in the SM (MD 5.63; 95% CI 2.15-9.11) and IES (MD 3.66; 95% CI 0.18-7.14) group compared to the control group. The mean childbirth satisfaction in the SM (p = 0.003) and IES (p = 0.046) groups was significantly higher than the control group; and duration of the active phase of labor was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than the control group. No serious side effects were occurred in none of the groups.

CONCLUSION

SM and IES are safe methods that can significantly reduce pain and duration of active phase and improve the experience and satisfaction of childbirth.

Prevalence of Perineal Tear Peripartum after Two Antepartum Perineal Massage Techniques: A Non-Randomised Controlled Trial

Perineal massage increases elasticity of myofascial perineal tissue and decreases the burning and perineal pain during labour, thus optimising child birth, although an application protocol has not been standardised yet. The objective of this study is to determine the efficiency of massage in perineal tear prevention and identification of possible differences in massage application. Total of 90 pregnant participants were divided into three groups: perineal massage and EPI-NO^® device group, applied by an expert physiotherapist, self-massage group, where women were instructed to apply perineal massage in domestic household, and a control group, which received ordinary obstetric attention. Results: The results showed significant differences among the control group and the two perineal massage groups in perineal postpartum pain. Correlations in perineal postpartum pain, labour duration and the baby's weight were not statistically significant. Lithotomy posture was significantly less prevalent in the massage group than in the other two; this variable is known to have a direct effect on episiotomy incidence and could act as a causal covariate of the different incidence of episiotomy in the groups. Perineal massage reduces postpartum perineal pain, prevalence and severity of perineal tear during delivery.

Effect of Regiosacralis Counterpressure Treatment on the Pain and Interleukin-6 Levels Among Primigravid Mothers During the First Stage Labor

BACKGROUND

Severe pain experienced by mother during the labor can cause fear and anxiety which can interfere with the overall labor process. Controlling pain during the labor process is important. Regiosacralis counterpressure pain management without altering the interleukin-6 (IL-6) level is expected to reduce the pain.

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed to investigate the effects of regiosacralis counterpressure on the pain and IL-6 levels during the first stage of labor among primigravid mothers.

METHOD

A quasiexperiment method with pretest–posttest control group design was applied. Regiosacralis counter-pressure pain management was applied to all study participants who non-randomly recruited by consecutive sampling methods. A total of 52 primigravid mothers were selected and divided into both the intervention group (n = 26) and the control group (n = 26).

RESULT

The statistical analysis of the intervention on the pain and IL-6 level revealed a significant difference between the pretest and posttest in the intervention group (p < .001; M pretest pain = 8.96 ± .528; M posttest pain = 6.96 ± .774; M pretest IL-6 = 175.539 ± 92.281; M posttest IL-6 = 170,764 ± 70,026).

CONCLUSION

Regiosacralis counterpressure treatment is effective in controlling and reducing the pain level during the first stage labor.

Birth plan presentation to hospitals and its relation to obstetric outcomes and selected pain relief methods during childbirth

Background

The information on birth plan (BP) usage in Spanish hospitals is scant.

Aim

To identify the percentage of pregnant women presenting a BP at five hospitals in Spain, the reasons why some women failed to do so and how BP presentation relates to obstetric outcomes and selected pain relief methods.

Methods

In this descriptive, multi-centre study, data were retrospectively collected. During the postpartum visits at primary healthcare centres in various health districts in Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain), a data collection sheet about obstetric outcomes and analgesia was administered to 432 mothers who had completed a BP during their pregnancies. The main outcome was the rate of BP presentation to the hospital. The sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics and pain relief measures were compared to identify any differences between mothers who presented a BP and those who did not.

Results

A total of 422 (99.7%) women were studied; 51.2% of women (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.4–55.9) had presented a BP. The main reason for not presenting a BP was because the hospital midwives did not request them (61.2%). No differences were observed in BP presentation according to age, the country of origin, education, employment or hospital. Mothers who presented a BP were more likely to start breastfeeding in the birthing room (82.4% vs. 73.3%; p = 0.024). Epidural analgesia was the most common method used for pain relief (88.9%), and women who presented a BP attempted to use concomitant non-pharmacological methods more often (50.5% vs. 38.8%; p = 0.012).

Conclusion

Almost half of the mothers failed to present a BP, usually because midwives did not request it.

Relief of pain due to uterine cramping/involution after birth

BACKGROUND

Women may experience differing types of pain and discomfort following birth, including cramping pain (often called after-birth pain) associated with uterine involution, where the uterus contracts to reduce blood loss and return the uterus to its non-pregnant size. This is an update of a review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief/analgesia for the relief of after-birth pains following vaginal birth.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (31 October 2019), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing two different types of analgesia or analgesia versus placebo or analgesia versus no treatment, for the relief of after-birth pains following vaginal birth. Types of analgesia included pharmacological and non-pharmacological. Quasi-randomised trials were not eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, conducted 'Risk of bias' assessment, extracted data and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we include 28 studies (involving 2749 women). The evidence identified in this review comes from middle- to high-income countries. Generally the trials were at low risk of selection bias, performance bias and attrition bias, but some trials were at high risk of bias due to selective reporting and lack of blinding. Our GRADE certainty of evidence assessments ranged from moderate to very low certainty, with downgrading decisions based on study limitations, imprecision, and (for one comparison) indirectness. Most studies reported our primary outcome of adequate pain relief as reported by the women. No studies reported data relating to neonatal adverse events, duration of hospital stay, or breastfeeding rates. Almost half of the included studies (11/28) excluded breastfeeding women from participating, making the evidence less generalisable to a broader group of women. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) compared to placebo NSAIDs are probably better than placebo for adequate pain relief as reported by the women (risk ratio (RR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45 to 1.91; 11 studies, 946 women; moderate-certainty evidence). NSAIDs may reduce the need for additional pain relief compared to placebo (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.33; 4 studies, 375 women; low-certainty evidence). There may be a similar risk of maternal adverse events (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.41; 9 studies, 598 women; low-certainty evidence). NSAIDs compared to opioids NSAIDs are probably better than opioids for adequate pain relief as reported by the women (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.57; 5 studies, 560 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and may reduce the risk of maternal adverse events (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.89; 3 studies, 255 women; low-certainty evidence). NSAIDs may be better than opioids for the need for additional pain relief, but the wide CIs include the possibility that the two classes of drugs are similarly effective or that opioids are better (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.12; 2 studies, 232 women; low-certainty evidence). Opioids compared to placebo Opioids may be better than placebo for adequate pain relief as reported by the women (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.61; 5 studies, 299 women; low-certainty evidence). Opioids may reduce the need for additional pain relief compared to placebo (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.82; 3 studies, 273 women; low-certainty evidence). Opioids may increase the risk of maternal adverse events compared with placebo, although the certainty of evidence is low (RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.55; 3 studies, 188 women; low-certainty evidence). Paracetamol compared to placebo Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if paracetamol is better than placebo for adequate pain relief as reported by the women, the need for additional pain relief, or risk of maternal adverse events (2 studies, 123 women). Paracetamol compared to NSAIDs Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if there are any differences between paracetamol and NSAIDs for adequate pain relief as reported by the women, or the risk of maternal adverse events. No data were reported about the need for additional pain relief comparing paracetamol and NSAIDs (2 studies, 112 women). NSAIDs compared to herbal analgesia We are uncertain if there are any differences between NSAIDs and herbal analgesia for adequate pain relief as reported by the women, the need for additional pain relief, or risk of maternal adverse events, because the certainty of evidence is very low (4 studies, 394 women). Transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS) compared to no TENS Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if TENS is better than no TENS for adequate pain relief as reported by the women. No other data were reported comparing TENS with no TENS (1 study, 32 women).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs may be better than placebo and are probably better than opioids at relieving pain from uterine cramping/involution following vaginal birth. NSAIDs and paracetamol may be as effective as each other, whereas opioids may be more effective than placebo. Due to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the effectiveness of other forms of pain relief. Future trials should recruit adequate numbers of women and ensure greater generalisability by including breastfeeding women. In addition, further research is required, including a survey of postpartum women to describe appropriately their experience of uterine cramping and involution. We identified nine ongoing studies, which may help to increase the level of certainty of the evidence around pain relief due to uterine cramping in future updates of this review.

Being in charge in an encounter with extremes. A survey study on how women experience and work with labour pain in a Nordic home birth setting

PROBLEM

There is a knowledge gap regarding women's experiences of coping with labour pain when not soliciting or not having access to pharmacological pain relief.

BACKGROUND

How women manage labour pain is complex, multifaceted and only the woman giving birth can assess the experienced pain. Women in the Nordic countries planning for a homebirth have little or no access to pharmacologic pain relief during labour.

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore how women experience and work with labour pain when giving birth in their own home.

METHODS

Quantitative and qualitative data was prospectively collected and altogether 1649 women with a planned homebirth answered closed and open-ended questions about labour pain and birth experience.

RESULTS

While labour pain was often experienced as positive or very positive, the intensity was experienced as severe or the worst imaginable pain. Two main themes arose from the womens´ descriptions of their birth experience regarding labour pain: An encounter with extremes and Being in charge at home.

DISCUSSION

Women perceived labour pain as severe but manageable and were dedicated to completing the birth at home. Being at home enabled the women to exercise autonomy and work with labour pain on their own terms, together with the midwife and support persons.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides knowledge about women's experiences of labour pain in a home birth setting who used varying strategies to work with labour pain. This is a subject that should be explored further since results could also apply to facility-based birth settings.

Complementary therapies in labor: randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of isolated and combined warm shower bath and perineal exercise with Swiss ball, on perception of pain, anxiety and labor progression.

METHOD

Randomized, controlled clinical trial with 128 patients allocated into three groups of therapies: isolated and combined bath and ball. Pain and anxiety perception was evaluated before and thirty minutes after therapeutic intervention through visual analogic scales (VAS).

RESULTS

Pain perception score increased, and anxiety decreased in all groups, mainly when using a shower bath. The cervical dilation increased in all groups (p<.001), as well as the number of uterine contractions increased, mainly in the group that used combined bath and ball and also showed shorter labor time.

CONCLUSION

The studied therapies contribute to maternal adaptation and well-being and favor labor's evolution.

Evidências científicas sobre métodos não farmacológicos para alívio a dor do parto

Resumo Objetivo Identificar na literatura nacional e internacional, estudos sobre a eficácia de métodos não farmacológicos na redução da dor do parto. Métodos Revisão integrativa realizada nas bases de dados MEDLINE/PUBMED, SCOPUS, CINAHL, LILACS e BDENF, com recorte temporal entre os anos de 2013 a 2018, em português, inglês e espanhol. Utilizado a metodologia PICo para construir a pergunta de pesquisa e selecionar descritores controlados e não controlados, que foram combinados com os operadores booleanos “AND”, “OR” e “NOT”. Resultados Foram selecionados 19 artigos. Dentre os métodos não farmacológicos encontrados, destacam-se: a acupuntura e suas principais variações (acupressão e auriculoterapia) (29,17%), hidroterapia (25%), exercícios perineais com a bola suíça (16,67%), terapias térmicas (8,33%) e os demais métodos (20,83%). Conclusão A acupuntura e a acupressão agem tanto sobre aspectos fisiológicos da dor como sobre sua subjetividade. O banho quente de aspersão, a musicoterapia, a aromaterapia e as técnicas de respiração promovem o relaxamento e a diminuição dos níveis de ansiedade. As terapias térmicas contribuem para a analgesia local de regiões afetadas pela dor. Os exercícios na bola suíça são importantes para reduzir a dor e adotar a posição vertical, importante na progressão do trabalho de parto.

Nurses and midwives' experiences of using non-pharmacological interventions for labour pain management: a qualitative study in Ghana

BACKGROUND

Non-pharmacological interventions hold promise in reducing labour pain, with minimal or no harm to the mother, foetus and the progress of labour and are simple and cost-effective. Yet their use has not been adequately explored in clinical settings, especially in sub-Saharan Africa.

METHODS

This was a descriptive phenomenological study. Fifteen (15) nurses and midwives working in labour wards of two hospitals in Ghana were interviewed. Data analysis was guided by the principles of coding by Bailey and the constant comparative approach to generate themes. Ethics approval was obtained from the 37 Military Teaching Hospital Institutional Review Board in Ghana.

RESULTS

Three major themes were identified that described the experiences of nurses and midwives regarding their use of non-pharmacological interventions in managing labour pain. These were familiarity with non-pharmacological interventions, perceived benefits of non-pharmacological interventions, and barriers to the use of non-pharmacological interventions in the management of labour pain.

CONCLUSIONS

While some non-pharmacological pain management interventions were known and used by the nurses and midwives, they were not familiar with a good number of these interventions. Nurses and midwives perceived these interventions to be beneficial yet a number of barriers prevented easy utilisation.

Birthing ball versus pethidine and haloperidol in satisfaction with childbirth

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects on maternal satisfaction of the use of the birthing ball as a method of pain relief compared to the subcutaneous administration of pethidine (50mg) and haloperidol (2.5mg), during the latent phase of labour.

METHOD

Randomised, unicentric, parallel and controlled clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Low-risk pregnant women hospitalised in a pathological pregnancy ward at the Gregorio Marañón University General Hospital (Madrid) due to prolonged pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, or labour prodromes.

INTERVENTION

once the patient's labour had become painful, a series of pre-established movements were implemented with a birthing ball in the intervention group, or pethidine and haloperidol were administered at the same dose subcutaneously. After the intervention and on the post-natal ward, satisfaction was measured with the Mackey Satisfaction Childbirth scale, validated in Spanish in 2016, in the first 48-72hours after delivery.

ANALYSIS

group comparisons: Student's t for continuous variables and Chi-squared for categorical variables. Significance at p<0.05.

RESULTS

The maternal satisfaction was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the comparison group, in all the domains of the scale: obstetrician (4.24/3.87), dilatation (4.02/3.35), second stage (4.27/3.67), newborn (4.72/4.43), accompaniment and comfort (4.78/4.44). There were, however, no statistically significant differences in the midwife subscale, although the scores were equally high (4.65/4.45).

CONCLUSION

Using birthing balls during the latent phase of labour increases women's satisfaction with their labour process more than administering pethidine and haloperidol during this period.

A prática de métodos não farmacológicos para o alívio da dor de parto em um hospital universitário no Brasil

Objetivo: identificar a prática de métodos não farmacológicos implementadas para o alívio da dor de parto em um hospital de ensino, os motivos que levaram a utilizá-los e o grau de satisfação.Materiais e métodos: estudo transversal, desenvolvido com 586 puérperas em um hospital de ensino do Brasil. A coleta de dados ocorreu entre fevereiro e setembro de 2016, tendo como fonte os registros dos prontuários, a carteira de pré-natal e um questionário estruturado aplicado 12 horas após o parto. Procedeu-se a uma análise descritiva por meio do SPSS, versão 18.Resultados: os métodos não farmacológicos mais conhecidos pelas mulheres foram banho (83,1 %) e deambulação (81,4 %). No hospital universitário, 55,5 % receberam orientação/informação sobre os métodos e o mais aceito foi o banho (66,6 %). O motivo mais relatado foi diminuição da intensidade/alívio da dor (71,8 %); 89,4 % consideram que a prática deste método lhes trouxe benefícios; para 79,9 %, o grau de satisfação foi maior ou igual a sete.Conclusão: o uso de métodos não farmacológicos é uma prática eficiente para o alívio da dor de parto. É importante empoderar e informar as parturientes quanto às estratégias disponíveis para o alívio da dor durante o trabalho de parto para que possam, nesse momento e em conjunto com os profissionais de saúde, escolher o melhor método.

A comparison of the effects of ENTONOX inhalation and spinal anesthesia on labor pain reduction and apgar score in vaginal delivery: a clinical trial study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of ENTONOX inhalation and spinal injection on the reduction of labor pain, the Apgar score of the neonates, and their side effects on new-born children and pregnant women.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present clinical trial study is conducted among the pregnant women in the maternity ward of a child delivery hospital in Iran. All Participants were divided in two groups ENTONOX Inhalation and Spinal Anesthesia. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was implemented to measure the pain level experienced by the participants during the procedure. Moreover, the Apgar scale was used to measure the general physical health of the neonates in both groups. In addition, the participants receiving ENTONOX were asked to report the side effects they underwent during gas inhalation. However, the participants in the spinal anesthesia were checked three times. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.

RESULTS

The findings showed that the spinal anesthesia technique was significantly more effective than gas inhalation in that it reduced as much as 3 points more than did the inhalation (P-value: 0.001). Moreover, the comparison of the mean Apgar scores showed that the mean Apgar score of the neonates of spinal anesthesia mothers was 0.36 point lower than that of the neonates in the gas inhalation group. However, this difference was not statistically significant at P- value = 0.06.

CONCLUSIONS

the result of the present study indicated that spinal anesthesia was more effective than ENTONOX inhalation in reducing the labor pain.

Effect of led photobiomodulation on analgesia during labor: Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Labor pain is one of the most intense pains experienced by women, which leads to an increase in the number of women opting to undergo a cesarean delivery. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological analgesia methods are used to control labor pain. Epidural analgesia is the most commonly used pharmacological analgesia method. However, it may have side effects on the fetus and the mother. Light-emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation is an effective and noninvasive alternative to pharmacological methods.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of LED photobiomodulation on analgesia during labor.

METHODS

In total, 60 women in labor admitted to a public maternity hospital will be selected for a randomized controlled trial. The participants will be randomized into 2 groups: intervention group [analgesia with LED therapy (n = 30)] and control group [analgesia with bath therapy (n = 30)]. The perception of pain will be assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), with a score from 0 to 10 at baseline, that is, before the intervention. In both the groups, the procedures will last 10 minutes and will be performed at 3 time points during labor: during cervical dilation of 4 to 5 cm, 6 to 7 cm, and 8 to 9 cm. At all 3 time points, pain perception will be evaluated using VAS shortly after the intervention. In addition, the evaluation of membrane characteristics (intact or damaged), heart rate, uterine dynamics, and cardiotocography will be performed at all time points.

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

The use of LED photobiomodulation will have an analgesic effect superior to that of the bath therapy.