1
|
O'Brien TD, Potter AB, Driscoll CC, Goh G, Letaw JH, McCabe S, Thanner J, Kulkarni A, Wong R, Medica S, Week T, Buitrago J, Larson A, Camacho KJ, Brown K, Crist R, Conrad C, Evans-Dutson S, Lutz R, Mitchell A, Anur P, Serrato V, Shafer A, Marriott LK, Hamman KJ, Mulford A, Wiszniewski W, Sampson JE, Adey A, O'Roak BJ, Harrington CA, Shannon J, Spellman PT, Richards CS. Population screening shows risk of inherited cancer and familial hypercholesterolemia in Oregon. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:1249-1265. [PMID: 37506692 PMCID: PMC10432140 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The Healthy Oregon Project (HOP) is a statewide effort that aims to build a large research repository and influence the health of Oregonians through providing no-cost genetic screening to participants for a next-generation sequencing 32-gene panel comprising genes related to inherited cancers and familial hypercholesterolemia. This type of unbiased population screening can detect at-risk individuals who may otherwise be missed by conventional medical approaches. However, challenges exist for this type of high-throughput testing in an academic setting, including developing a low-cost high-efficiency test and scaling up the clinical laboratory for processing large numbers of samples. Modifications to our academic clinical laboratory including efficient test design, robotics, and a streamlined analysis approach increased our ability to test more than 1,000 samples per month for HOP using only one dedicated HOP laboratory technologist. Additionally, enrollment using a HIPAA-compliant smartphone app and sample collection using mouthwash increased efficiency and reduced cost. Here, we present our experience three years into HOP and discuss the lessons learned, including our successes, challenges, opportunities, and future directions, as well as the genetic screening results for the first 13,670 participants tested. Overall, we have identified 730 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 710 participants in 24 of the 32 genes on the panel. The carrier rate for pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in the inherited cancer genes on the panel for an unselected population was 5.0% and for familial hypercholesterolemia was 0.3%. Our laboratory experience described here may provide a useful model for population screening projects in other states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D O'Brien
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Amiee B Potter
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Catherine C Driscoll
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Gregory Goh
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - John H Letaw
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Sarah McCabe
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jane Thanner
- Information Technology Group, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Arpita Kulkarni
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Rossana Wong
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Samuel Medica
- Integrated Genomics Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Tiana Week
- Integrated Genomics Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jacob Buitrago
- Integrated Genomics Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Aaron Larson
- Integrated Genomics Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Katie Johnson Camacho
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Kim Brown
- Knight Cancer Institute, Community Outreach and Engagement, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Rachel Crist
- Knight Cancer Institute, Community Outreach and Engagement, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Casey Conrad
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Sara Evans-Dutson
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Ryan Lutz
- Knight Cancer Institute, Community Outreach and Engagement, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Asia Mitchell
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Pavana Anur
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Vanessa Serrato
- Knight Cancer Institute, Community Outreach and Engagement, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Autumn Shafer
- University of Oregon, School of Journalism and Communication, Portland, OR 97209, USA
| | | | - K J Hamman
- Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Amelia Mulford
- Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Wojciech Wiszniewski
- Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jone E Sampson
- Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Andrew Adey
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA; Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Brian J O'Roak
- Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Christina A Harrington
- Integrated Genomics Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jackilen Shannon
- Knight Cancer Institute, Community Outreach and Engagement, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA; Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Paul T Spellman
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA; Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - C Sue Richards
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roberts LW, Kim JP, Rostami M, Kasun M, Kim B. Self-reported influences on willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccines among physically ill, mentally ill, and healthy individuals. J Psychiatr Res 2022; 155:501-510. [PMID: 36191518 PMCID: PMC9491855 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Individuals with mental and physical disorders have been disproportionately affected by adverse health outcomes due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and yet vaccine hesitancy persists despite clear evidence of health benefits. Therefore, our study explored factors influencing willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS Individuals with mental illness (n = 332), physical illness (n = 331), and no health issues (n = 328) were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk. Participants rated willingness to obtain a fully approved COVID-19 vaccine or a vaccine approved only for experimental/emergency use and influences in six domains upon their views. We examined differences by health status. RESULTS Participants across groups were moderately willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Perceived risk was negatively associated with willingness. Participants differentiated between vaccine risk by approval stage and were less willing to receive an experimental vaccine. Individuals with mental illness rated risk of both vaccines similarly to healthy individuals. Individuals with physical illness expressed less willingness to receive an experimental vaccine. Domain influences differently affected willingness by health status as well as by vaccine approval status. CONCLUSIONS Our findings are reassuring regarding the ability of people with mental disorders to appreciate risk in medical decision-making and the ability of people of varied health backgrounds to distinguish between the benefits and risks of clinical care and research, refuting the prevailing notions of psychiatric exceptionalism and therapeutic misconception. Our findings shine a light on potential paths forward to support vaccine acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Weiss Roberts
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 401 Quarry Road, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rostami M, Paik Kim J, Turner-Essel L, Roberts LW. Maternal Perceptions of Safeguards for Research Involving Children. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES 2022; 31:1220-1231. [PMID: 35875400 PMCID: PMC9307055 DOI: 10.1007/s10826-021-02037-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
The vitality of clinical research and the health of the public relies on continued efforts to engage children in clinical research in a fully protected and ethically robust manner. Parents serve as proxy decision-makers assessing the risks and benefits of any given study in order to do what is in the best interest of their child. This study investigated maternal perceptions of research safeguards and mothers' willingness to enroll their children in clinical research studies. We hypothesized that mothers' perceptions of the protectiveness of safeguard procedures utilized in clinical research would be associated with mothers' willingness to enroll their children in research studies with such safeguards. Through a survey conducted via Amazon Mechanical Turk, mothers were asked to rate the perceived protectiveness of four safeguard procedures (confidential data coding, data and safety monitoring boards (DSMBs), institutional review boards (IRBs), and informed consent) and the degree to which they were willing to have their child participate in research studies in the presence of each of the four safeguard procedures. Respondents generally perceived safeguard procedures to be protective. Mothers' trust in researchers' honesty positively impacted perceptions of the protectiveness of research safeguard procedures and willingness to enroll children in research. Mothers of only healthy children perceived research safeguards to be more protective than mothers with at least one child with at least one health issue. This study provides insight into whether maternal perceptions of the protectiveness of different safeguard procedures are associated with mothers' willingness to enroll their children in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Rostami
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Jane Paik Kim
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Laura Turner-Essel
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Laura Weiss Roberts
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gonzalez S, Strizich G, Isasi CR, Hua S, Comas B, Sofer T, Thyagarajan B, Perreira KM, Talavera GA, Daviglus ML, Nelson SC, Giachello AL, Schneiderman N, Kaplan RC. Consent for Use of Genetic Data among US Hispanics/Latinos: Results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/ Study of Latinos. Ethn Dis 2021; 31:547-558. [PMID: 34720558 DOI: 10.18865/ed.31.4.547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Inclusion of historically underrepresented populations in biomedical research is critical for large precision medicine research initiatives. Among 13,721 Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) enrollees, we used multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratios to describe characteristics associated with participants' willingness to consent to different levels of biospecimen and genetic data analysis and sharing. At baseline (2008-2011), HCHS/SOL participants almost universally consented to the use of biospecimens and genetic data by study investigators and their collaborators (97.6%; 95%CI: 97.1, 98.0). Fewer consented to biospecimen and genetic data sharing with investigators not affiliated with the HCHS/SOL research team (81%, 95%CI: 80, 82) or any data sharing with commercial/for-profit entities (75%, 95%CI: 74, 76). Those refusing to share their data beyond the study investigators group were more often females, Spanish language-speakers and non-US born individuals. As expected, participants who were retained and reconsented at the six-year follow up visit tended to embrace broader data sharing, although this varied by group. Over time, Puerto Ricans and Dominicans were more likely to convert to broader data sharing than individuals of a Mexican background. Our analysis suggests that acculturation and immigration status of specific Hispanic/Latino communities may influence decisions about participation in genomic research projects and biobanks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Gonzalez
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Garrett Strizich
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Carmen R Isasi
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Simin Hua
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Betsy Comas
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Tamar Sofer
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard Medical School. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Bharat Thyagarajan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Krista M Perreira
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Gregory A Talavera
- South Bay Latino Research Center, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
| | - Martha L Daviglus
- Institute for Minority Health Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Sarah C Nelson
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Aida L Giachello
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Neil Schneiderman
- Department of Psychology and Behavioral Medicine Research Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Robert C Kaplan
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.,Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kastrinos A, Campbell-Salome G, Shelton S, Peterson EB, Bylund CL. PGx in psychiatry: Patients' knowledge, interest, and uncertainty management preferences in the context of pharmacogenomic testing. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:732-738. [PMID: 33414028 PMCID: PMC9620865 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pharmacogenomic testing (PGx) is expanding into psychiatric care. PGx could potentially offer a unique benefit to psychiatric patients, providing information about patients' reaction to medications that could reduce the time and financial burdens of drug optimization. The aims of this study were to: (1) examine psychiatry patients' familiarity and interest in PGx, and (2) explore how Uncertainty Management Theory relates to PGx testing in psychiatry. METHOD We surveyed psychiatric patients, measuring their PGx familiarity and interest, attitudes toward PGx testing, and preference for managing illness uncertainty. RESULTS We analyzed data from 598 patients. Patients' familiarity of PGx was low, but interest was high. Thirty percent of patients were familiar with the test from communication with their healthcare provider or their own online health information seeking. A preference for seeking information was a significant positive predictor of testing interest (p < .001). CONCLUSION Psychiatric patients were interested in PGx testing, regardless of their uncertainty management preferences. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS This study is one of the first to examine psychiatric patients' perspectives on PGx testing in mental health care. Our findings show that psychiatric patients are interested in the test and are familiar enough with PGx to be included in future research on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Kastrinos
- College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States.
| | - Gemme Campbell-Salome
- College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
| | - Summer Shelton
- Department of Communication, Media, & Persuasion, Idaho State University, Pocatello, United States
| | | | - Carma L Bylund
- College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Do human subject safeguards matter to potential participants in psychiatric genetic research? J Psychiatr Res 2019; 116:95-103. [PMID: 31226581 PMCID: PMC6703554 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Revised: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Despite longstanding concerns about the adequacy of human research protections in mental illness investigations, minimal work has focused on the perspectives of key stakeholders regarding these safeguards. This investigation examined the perspectives of potential research participants regarding safeguards for psychiatric genetic research. Individuals with mental illness (n = 71), first-degree family members of individuals with mental illness (n = 54), and individuals with no personal or close family history of mental illness (n = 57) provided responses to items regarding perceptions of: 1) protectiveness of a range of research safeguards in genetic research on mental illness; 2) influence of these safeguards on research participation decision-making; and 3) importance of these safeguards depending on the nature of the research (i.e., genetic vs. non-genetic mental illness research; and genetic research on mental illness vs. physical illness). Potential research participants perceived existing safeguard procedures as generally protective. The three groups did not differ in their ratings of protectiveness, with the exception of the safeguard domain of "Informed Consent or Alternative Decision-Making Procedures," which was viewed as more protective by family members of people with mental illness than by individuals with mental illness or comparison participants. Safeguard procedures were perceived as strongly influential with respect to willingness to enroll in psychiatric genetic research. These findings suggest that the presence of safeguards positively influences enrollment decision-making by research volunteers and indicate that potential psychiatric genetic research participants find safeguards to be protective, underscoring the responsibility to implement safeguard practices conscientiously.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim JP, Ryan K, Roberts LW. Attitudes Regarding Enrollment in a Genetic Research Project: An Informed Consent Simulation Study Comparing Views of People With Depression, Diabetes, and Neither Condition. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2019; 14:328-337. [PMID: 31328612 DOI: 10.1177/1556264619862467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In this study, participants with a self-reported history of depression, diabetes, or no illness underwent a simulated informed consent process for a hypothetical genetic study related to depression or diabetes. Participants completed a survey assessing their perceived understanding of the research process, perceptions of its risks and benefits, their satisfaction with the informed consent process, and their readiness to make a hypothetical enrollment decision. All participants indicated strong readiness to make an enrollment decision regarding the research characterized in the simulation. Participants reported understanding the consent process relatively well and being generally satisfied with it. Greater concerns were expressed regarding psychosocial risks than biological risks for genetic studies on mental disorders. Our study documented positive attitudes toward volunteering for research that involved the collection of genetic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katie Ryan
- 1 Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Scott DM, Thomas VG, Otado J, Rockcliffe F, Olopoenia O, Johnson D, Callier S. Attitudes and experiences regarding genetic research among persons of African descent. J Community Genet 2019; 11:65-72. [PMID: 31062230 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-019-00422-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Minorities are underrepresented in genetic research. This study examined the attitudes, experiences, and willingness of persons of African descent related to participation in genetic research. A total of 272 persons of African descent completed a questionnaire about attitudes and experiences associated with genetic research. Descriptive, Chi-square, and logistic regression were used to examine the impact of attitudes and experiences in predicting the odds of willingness to participate in genetic research. A majority of participants (97%) indicated that they have never participated in genetic research; however, a majority also reported that they would be willing to participate in a genetic study specifically for the detection of risk factors for cancer (87%), diabetes (89%), alcohol use disorder (73%), and Alzheimer's disease (88%). Participants who disagreed that "results from genetic research can explain why some diseases are found more often in some ethnic groups than others" were less likely to be willing to participate in studies related to cancer (OR = 0.16), diabetes (OR = .16), alcohol use disorder (OR = 0.27), and Alzheimer's disease (OR = 0.27). Participants reported limited experiences engaging in genetic research; yet, they overwhelmingly acknowledged the importance of genetic research and expressed willingness to participate in multifactorial genetic studies despite concerns about genetic discrimination, stigma, and/or a potentially poor prognosis. Further research on the underlying reasons why persons of African descent choose to participate in genetic research should be explored and addressed to make research more inclusive and ethically sound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise M Scott
- Departments of Pediatrics and Human Genetics, Howard University College of Medicine, 520 W Street NW, Suite 3408, Washington, DC, 20059, USA.
| | - Veronica G Thomas
- Department of Human Development and Psychoeducational Studies, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jane Otado
- College of Medicine, Community Health and Family Medicine, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Faun Rockcliffe
- Department of Human Development and Psychoeducational Studies, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Dietrich Johnson
- Department of Pharmacology, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Shawneequa Callier
- Clinical Research and Leadership, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.,Special Volunteer, Center for Research on Genomics and Global Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Roberts LW, Tsungmey T, Kim JP, Hantke M. Views of the importance of psychiatric genetic research by potential volunteers from stakeholder groups. J Psychiatr Res 2018; 106:69-73. [PMID: 30292779 PMCID: PMC6333463 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Revised: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Few studies have explored potential volunteers' attitudes toward genetic research. To address this gap in the literature, we developed an empirical project to document views held by individuals who may wish to enroll in genetic studies involving mental disorders. People living with mental illness, family members of people with mental illness, and community comparison volunteers were queried regarding their views on the importance of genetic research generally, in comparison with medical research, and in relation to 12 health conditions categorized in four types. T-tests and univariate and multivariate analysis of variance were used as appropriate. Participants expressed support for the importance of genetic research (mean = 9.43, scale = 1-10) and endorsed genetic research more highly compared with non-genetic medical research (mean = 9.43 vs. 8.69, P value = <0.001). The most highly endorsed genetic research was for cognitive disorders, followed by mental illness disorders, physical illness disorders, and addiction disorders (means = 8.88, 8.26, 8.16 and 7.55, respectively, P value = <0.001). Overall, this study provides evidence of strong endorsement of genetic research over non-genetic research by potential volunteers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Weiss Roberts
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, 94305-5717, USA.
| | - Tenzin Tsungmey
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, USA, 94305-5717
| | - Jane Paik Kim
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, USA, 94305-5717
| | - Melinda Hantke
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, USA, 94305-5717
| |
Collapse
|