Marital status and perceived stress in men with advanced prostate cancer: A randomized-controlled trial of cognitive behavioral stress management

Cognitive behavioral stress management effects on cancer-related distress and neuroendocrine signaling in breast cancer: differential effects by neighborhood disadvantage

PURPOSE

Women residing in disadvantaged neighborhoods experience disparities in breast cancer (BC) survival which persist when accounting for individual-level socioeconomic/treatment factors. The chronic stress of living in a disadvantaged neighborhood may compound the stress of a new cancer diagnosis, leading to neuroendocrine dysregulation. Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) has shown efficacy at reducing distress and modulating neuroendocrine functioning, but it is unknown whether it is efficacious in this population.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial of 10-week group-based CBSM (versus a psycho-educational control) in women with nonmetastatic BC. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was calculated, and women were categorized as living in low (n = 175) versus high disadvantage (n = 50). Women completed a measure of cancer-related distress (Impact of Events Scale-Intrusions) and underwent blood draws to collect PM cortisol at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Hierarchical linear modeling tested whether condition predicted the slope of outcomes, and whether ADI moderated these relationships.

RESULTS

CBSM was associated with greater reductions in cancer-specific distress and cortisol, though these effects were not found to be moderated by ADI. Exploratory simple slope analyses showed that CBSM was associated with decreased cancer-related distress across ADI categories, while CBSM resulted in decreased cortisol among low ADI women only.

CONCLUSION

CBSM reduced cancer-related distress across neighborhoods, but this was only accompanied by cortisol changes among those in advantaged neighborhoods. Neighborhood disadvantage may represent a particularly salient stressor that is distinct from cancer-specific distress. Future interventions targeting this population should consider modifications to increase relevance and accessibility.

Assessing the Impact of the Prostate Cancer Patient Empowerment Program (PC-PEP) on Relationship Satisfaction, Quality of Life, and Support Group Participation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background/Objectives: The Prostate Cancer Patient Empowerment Program (PC-PEP) is a 6-month, home-based intervention aimed at enhancing mental health in men undergoing curative prostate cancer treatment. This exploratory secondary analysis evaluates PC-PEP's impact on relationship satisfaction, quality of life, and support group attendance among partnered participants. Methods: In a crossover randomized clinical trial ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03660085) of 128 men aged 50-82 scheduled for curative prostate cancer surgery or radiotherapy, 119 participants in relationships were included. Of these, 59 received the 6-month PC-PEP intervention, while 60 were randomized to a waitlist-control arm, receiving standard care for 6 months before starting PC-PEP. The intervention included daily emails with video instructions on mental and physical health, diet, social support, fitness, stress reduction, and intimacy. Outcomes were assessed using the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P). Results: While relationship satisfaction remained stable, a significant improvement in emotional well-being was observed at 12 months in participants undergoing radiation therapy (p = 0.045). The PC-PEP intervention also led to significantly higher support group attendance at both 6 months (p = 0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.003), emphasizing its role in fostering social support and community engagement. Conclusions: The PC-PEP program effectively maintains relationship satisfaction and enhances emotional well-being, particularly in patients with fewer physical side effects. Its design promotes comprehensive care by integrating physical, psychological, and social support, making it a valuable resource for improving the quality of life in prostate cancer patients and potentially applicable to other cancer types.

Identification of patient subgroups who benefit from a behavioral intervention to improve adjuvant endocrine therapy adherence: a randomized-controlled trial

PURPOSE

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces breast cancer morbidity and mortality; however, adherence is suboptimal. Interventions exist, yet few have improved adherence. Patient characteristics may alter uptake of an intervention to boost adherence. We examined moderators of the effect of a virtual intervention (STRIDE; #NCT03837496) on AET adherence after breast cancer.

METHODS

At a large academic medical center, patients taking AET (N = 100; Mage = 56.1, 91% White) were randomized to receive STRIDE versus medication monitoring. All stored their medication in digital pill bottles (MEMS Caps) which captured objective adherence. Participants self-reported adherence (Medication Adherence Report Scale) at 12 weeks post-baseline. Moderators included age, anxiety, and depressive symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), AET-related symptom distress (Breast Cancer Prevention Trial Symptom Scale), and AET-specific concerns (Beliefs about Medications Questionnaire). We used hierarchical linear modeling (time × condition × moderator) and multiple regression (condition × moderator) to test the interaction effects on adherence.

RESULTS

Age (B = 0.05, SE = 0.02, p = 0.003) and AET-related symptom distress (B = -0.04, SE = 0.02, p = 0.02) moderated condition effect on self-reported adherence while anxiety (B = -1.20, SE = 0.53, p = 0.03) and depressive symptoms (B = -1.65, SE = 0.65, p = 0.01) moderated objective adherence effects. AET-specific concerns approached significance (B = 0.91, SE = 0.57, p = 0.12). Participants who received STRIDE and were older or presented with lower anxiety and depressive symptoms or AET-related symptom distress exhibited improved adherence. Post hoc analyses revealed high correlations among most moderators.

CONCLUSIONS

A subgroup of patients who received STRIDE exhibited improvements in AET adherence. The interrelatedness of moderators suggests an underlying profile of patients with lower symptom burden who benefitted most from the intervention.

STUDY REGISTRATION

NCT03837496.

An offline to online cognitive behavioral stress management caring program effectively improves psychological pressure, spiritual well-being, and quality of life in postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

This study designed an offline to online cognitive behavioral stress management (OOCBSM) caring program, intending to investigate its effect on mental health and quality of life (QoL) using multiple scales in postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

254 postoperative HCC patients were randomly (1:1) allocated into OOCBSM (included a 10-week offline CBSM and subsequent online CBSM until M6) and normal care (NC) groups (10-week NC). Hospital anxiety-and-depression scale (HADS), Zung's self-reporting anxiety (SAS) and depression scale (SDS), FACIT-SP, European quality-of-life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and quality-of-life questionnaire-core30 (QLQ-C30) were assessed over 6 months (M).

RESULTS

HADS-defined-anxiety rates at M3 (P = 0.036) and M6 (P = 0.025), SAS-defined-anxiety rate at M6 (P = 0.049), HADS-defined-depression rates at M3 (P = 0.026) and M6 (P = 0.049), and SDS-defined-depression rates at M3 (P = 0.015) and M6 (P = 0.043) were all lower in OOCBSM group compared to NC group. Furthermore, FACIT-SP scores at M1 (P = 0.004), M3 (P = 0.003), and M6 (P<0.001) were higher in OOCBSM group compared with NC group. EQ-5D scores at M1 (P = 0.025) and M3 (P = 0.030) but not M6 (P = 0.128), and QLQ-C30-symptom score at M3 (P = 0.014) but not M1 (P = 0.198) and M6 (P = 0.058) were lower in OOCBSM group versus NC group; QLQ-C30-global-health-status scores at M3 (P = 0.027) and M6 (P = 0.001) but not M1 (P = 0.312), QLQ-C30-function scores at M3 (P = 0.005) and M6 (P = 0.001) but not M1 (P = 0.084) were higher in OOCBSM group versus NC group. Patients with younger ages or higher education benefited more from OOCBSM.

CONCLUSION

OOCBSM improves psychological pressure, spiritual well-being, and QoL in postoperative HCC patients, especially in those with younger ages or higher education.