1
|
Fideler F, Hofmann J, Schmidt A, Blumenstock G, Grasshoff C. Assessing risk factors for epidural catheter infections in paediatric surgery: a retrospective study on prolonged catheter use. Br J Anaesth 2025; 134:1588-1590. [PMID: 40133112 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2024] [Revised: 02/18/2025] [Accepted: 02/19/2025] [Indexed: 03/27/2025] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Fideler
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Julian Hofmann
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schmidt
- Department of Paediatric Surgery and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gunnar Blumenstock
- Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian Grasshoff
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cassaro F, Impellizzeri P, Maisano G, Romeo C, Arena S. Enhanced recovery after urological reconstructive surgery in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 2025; 41:110. [PMID: 40205204 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-025-06017-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/31/2025] [Indexed: 04/11/2025]
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a protocol that includes rules aimed to minimize surgical stress and to reduce the post-operative period. Initially applied in intestinal surgery of adults, a recent meta-analysis suggested that ERAS is valid also in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery. This study systematically reviewed and performed a meta-analysis to evaluate ERAS benefits in pediatric urological reconstructive surgery. A PubMed search identified studies comparing ERAS and traditional protocols in pediatric urological reconstructive surgery. Data on major and minor complications, hospital readmission, and length of hospital stay were collected and analyzed. Analyses were performed using OR and Cl 95%. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. A total of 10 papers met the inclusion criteria, with 1410 included patients (492 ERAS group, 918 No-ERAS). There were significant differences in major complications (p < 0.001) and length of stay (p < 0.001) and the incidence of minor complications (p = 0.002) favoring patients undergoing ERAS protocol; differently, there was no difference in hospital readmission (p = 0.763). ERAS protocol is safe and feasible for children undergoing reconstructive urological surgery, reducing the risks of complications and the length of hospital stay, without increasing readmission risk. ERAS should also be a standardized procedure in pediatric reconstructive urological surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabiola Cassaro
- Unit of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, 98125, Messina, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125, Messina, Italia
| | - Pietro Impellizzeri
- Unit of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Giulia Maisano
- Unit of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Carmelo Romeo
- Unit of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Salvatore Arena
- Unit of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, 98125, Messina, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meier KM, Ha D, Sevick C, Blanchette ED, Brockel MA, Vemulakonda VM, Rove KO. Opioid prescribing patterns and the effect of chronic kidney disease in pediatric urology population: A retrospective cohort analysis. J Pediatr Urol 2025; 21:460-469. [PMID: 39710562 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Revised: 11/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/19/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant efforts have been undertaken to decrease opioid prescribing, but there is little research into patient-specific factors presenting as barriers in the pediatric surgical population. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been shown to be a safe and effective alternative to opioids for pain control, however, concerns about their impact on renal function limit their use in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Data is limited on the interplay of CKD on opioid prescribing. OBJECTIVE We hypothesized that opioid reduction efforts were successful, but patients with CKD would be more likely to receive an opioid prescription than those without CKD. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study of patients ≤18 years old undergoing urologic surgery from 2014 to 2022 was performed. Patients were stratified by CKD diagnosis, determined by chart diagnosis and confirmed with CKiD U25 eGFR calculations, excluding those with normal eGFR or Stage 1 CKD. Patients without a documented CKD diagnosis and without preoperative renal function testing were presumed not to have CKD. Patients were propensity matched using the optimal full algorithm across 12 different variables. Outcomes of interest were discharge opioid prescriptions, non-opioid analgesic prescriptions, and unscheduled healthcare encounters (urology clinic visits within 5 days, emergency department visits, readmissions, or reoperations within 30 days). RESULTS 10,604 patients were included. 603 patients (5.7 %) had a pre-existing CKD diagnosis; the majority were CKD stage 2 (77.8 %, 466 patients). A significant decrease in discharge opioid prescriptions was seen for patients with and without CKD. Patients with CKD had greater opioid exposure prior to surgery (17.2 %, 104 versus 2.8 %, 280, p = 0.04). Those with CKD were equally likely to be prescribed NSAIDs (p = 0.36) and opioids (p = 0.09) at discharge. Patients with CKD were more likely to present to the emergency department (ED) within 30 days of surgery (17.6 % versus 7.9 %, p = 0.007). DISCUSSION Similar proportions of patients with and without CKD received an opioid prescription at discharge. Patients with CKD were more likely to be exposed to opioids in-hospital earlier than non-CKD counterparts. CONCLUSIONS Multiple interventions and a dedicated postoperative opioid reduction protocol worked well, even in patients with CKD where there is concern about safely receiving NSAIDs. All-cause unplanned healthcare encounters did not differ significantly within groups with introduction of these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen M Meier
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA; Pediatric Urology Research Enterprise, Department of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
| | - Darren Ha
- Pediatric Urology Research Enterprise, Department of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Carter Sevick
- Pediatric Urology Research Enterprise, Department of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Eliza D Blanchette
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA
| | - Megan A Brockel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Vijaya M Vemulakonda
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA; Pediatric Urology Research Enterprise, Department of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kyle O Rove
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA; Pediatric Urology Research Enterprise, Department of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stangl-Kremser J, Olivera L, Giudici S, Pradere B, Mertens LS, Albisinni S, Laukhtina E, Del Giudice F, Afferi L, Soria F, Sforza S, O'Kelly F, Lammers RJ, Silay MS, Minervini A, Masieri L, Akhavan A, 't Hoen LA, Moschini M, Mari A. Application of the ERAS guidelines in pediatric urological surgery: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:271-277. [PMID: 38920008 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.24.05511-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Consensus for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in pediatrics has been achieved in neonatal intestinal surgery, yet it is not widely utilized in pediatric urology. We investigated the application of ERAS guidelines in pediatric urology, and determined its effects given the available level of evidence supporting the ERAS protocol in children. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature review including series providing adoption of fast-track recovery protocols for pediatric urology procedures was carried out. Main outcome measures were study characteristics, adherence to the 19 ERAS items, complication rates and length of hospital stay. Sub-group analysis by surgery type (hypospadias versus major surgery) was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Nine series with data from 1272 surgical pediatric cases were included. An enhanced recovery pathway was applied in 67.3% of the reports. Two series included patients undergoing hypospadias repair and ERAS items were insufficiently reported. Studies including children undergoing major procedures mentioned a median of 15 ERAS items, yet applied a median of 11 items. Median compliance rate was 88.9% (range 50-100). More ERAS guideline items were reported (applied or mentioned) in the most recently published studies. CONCLUSIONS There is limited reporting and use of the ERAS guidelines in urologic surgery particularly in hypospadias repair; whilst in major surgery in children, adherence and compliance rates vary widely. In more recent series there was an increase in ERAS items that have been mentioned and applied. Future research is needed to identify barriers and to overcome them in order to fully adopt and benefit from the ERAS pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Olivera
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Meyer Children Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sofia Giudici
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Unit of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Soria
- Urology Division, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Sforza
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Meyer Children Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Fardod O'Kelly
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Beacon Hospital, University College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rianne J Lammers
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mesrur S Silay
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Istanbul Biruni University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Masieri
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Meyer Children Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Ardavan Akhavan
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisette A 't Hoen
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shao YR, Ke X, Luo LH, Xu JD, Xu LQ. Application of early enteral nutrition nursing based on enhanced recovery after surgery theory in patients with digestive surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:1910-1918. [PMID: 37901724 PMCID: PMC10600773 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative nursing can improve the restlessness and gastrointestinal function of patients with tracheal intubation under general anesthesia in digestive surgery. Wide application of various nursing methods and routine nursing in perioperative nursing of patients with general anesthesia in digestive surgery. AIM To investigate the impact of early postoperative enteral nutrition nursing based on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) theory on postoperative agitation and gastrointestinal recovery in patients undergoing general anesthesia that experienced tracheal intubation. METHODS The data of 126 patients with digestive surgery from May 2019 to February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different nursing methods, they were divided into control group and observation group, with 63 cases in observation group and 63 cases in control group. The patients in the control group had standard perioperative nursing care, whereas those in the observation group got enteral nourishment as soon as possible after surgery in accordance with ERAS theory. Both the rate and quality of gastrointestinal function recovery were compared between the two groups after treatment ended. Postoperative anesthesia-related adverse events were tallied, patients' nutritional statuses were monitored, and the Riker sedation and agitation score (SAS) was used to measure the incidence of agitation. RESULTS When compared to the control group, the awake duration, spontaneous breathing recovery time, extubation time and postoperative eye-opening time were all considerably shorter (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the recovery time of orientation force between the two groups (P > 0.05); however, the observation group had a lower SAS score than the control group (P < 0.05). The recovery time for normal intestinal sounds, the time it took to have the first postoperative exhaust, the time it took to have the first postoperative defecation, and the time it took to have the first postoperative half-fluid feeding were all faster in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05); Fasting blood glucose was lower in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.05), while the albumin and hemoglobin levels were higher on the first and third postoperative days; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of anesthesia-related adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION The extremely early postoperative enteral nutrition nursing based on ERAS theory can reduce the degree of agitation, improve the quality of recovery, promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function, and improve the nutritional status of patients in the recovery period after tracheal intubation under general anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan-Ru Shao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510062, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xia Ke
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510062, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Li-Hua Luo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510062, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jin-Dong Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510062, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Li-Qian Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510062, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fung ACH, Chu FYT, Chan IHY, Wong KKY. Enhanced recovery after surgery in pediatric urology: Current evidence and future practice. J Pediatr Urol 2023; 19:98-106. [PMID: 35995660 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To offer an up-to-date appraisal of the current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in pediatric urology and to provide a guide for the clinical urologist. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature search and scoping review on ERAS protocols in pediatric urology using Pubmed (from 1946), Cochrane library, and MEDLINE to December 2021 with the terms ''enhanced recovery'', ''protocolised care'', ''post-operative protocol", ''fast-track surgery'' and ''pediatric urology". Studies were excluded if they did not include perioperative intervention related to urological procedures, no full-text available and in non-English language. RESULTS To date, eight clinical studies (involving 1153 patients) have been published on ERAS protocols in pediatric urology. The patients involved ranged from neonates to adolescents, and the urological procedures included bladder augmentation, the Mitrofanoff procedure, laparoscopic pyeloplasty, laparoscopic nephrectomy, hypospadias repair, etc. Multidisciplinary components such as surgical and anesthetic considerations have been employed in ERAS protocols. The length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the ERAS groups with earlier enteral feeding resumption and return of bowel function in pediatric urology patients. The implementation of ERAS protocols does not result in higher complication and readmission rates; instead, some studies have even demonstrated a significant reduction in complication occurrence. CONCLUSION ERAS is novel to pediatric urology with a limited scale of published data in the literature. Initial clinical studies revealed that ERAS appears to be efficacious in the field of pediatric urology. Further prospective studies formulating a standardized multimodal protocol are encouraged to better understand key components of ERAS and incorporate ERAS into clinical practice to optimize surgical outcomes for pediatric urology procedures.
Collapse
|
7
|
Chan Y, Ellison J. What the editors are reading: Quality improvement and patient safety. J Pediatr Urol 2022; 18:700-703. [PMID: 36244900 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonathan Ellison
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Urology, Milwaukee, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mittal S, Eftekharzadeh S, Aghababian A, Shah J, Fischer K, Weaver J, Tan C, Plachter N, Long C, Weiss D, Zaontz M, Kolon T, Zderic S, Canning D, Van Batavia J, Shukla A, Srinivasan A. Trends in opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) usage in children undergoing common urinary tract reconstruction: A large, single-institutional analysis. J Pediatr Urol 2022; 18:501.e1-501.e7. [PMID: 35803865 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Opioid stewardship is recognized as a critical clinical priority. We previously reported marked reductions in narcotic administration after implementation of an opioid reduction protocol for pediatric ambulatory urologic surgery. We hypothesize that a decrease in post-operative and discharge opioid administration will not increase short-term adverse events. STUDY DESIGN All pediatric patients undergoing open or robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty or ureteral reimplantation between 2015 and 2019 were included. Patients' demographics, opioid and NSAID administration, urology or pain-related emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and reoperations within 30 days of surgery, were aggregated. RESULTS 438 patients, with a median age of 3.5 years (IQR 1.5-8.3) at the time of surgery, met the inclusion criteria. Annual rates of inpatient opioid administration and prescriptions decreased significantly over the study period, while rates of intra-operative, inpatient, and prescribed NSAIDs significantly increased. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations within 30 days of surgery between patients who received an opioid prescription and those who did not. Multivariate regression showed that patients who did not receive an opioid prescription at discharge were found to be at a lower risk for unplanned encounters including ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations (OR:0.5, 95%CI: 0.2-0.9, p = 0.04). DISCUSSION The present study shows the decreasing trend in inpatient opioid administration and opioid prescription after discharge, when accompanied by an increase NSAID administration, does not result in a significant change in rates of unplanned encounters and complications, similar to results from previous studies on non-urological and ambulatory urological surgeries. CONCLUSIONS Non-opioid pain control after major pediatric urologic reconstruction is safe and effective. We found that a reduction in opioid administration can be associated with a reduced risk of unplanned ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations. Further investigations are required to corroborate this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Mittal
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Urology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Care, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 3rd Floor West Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Sahar Eftekharzadeh
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Aznive Aghababian
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jay Shah
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Katherine Fischer
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - John Weaver
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Connie Tan
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Natalie Plachter
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Christopher Long
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Urology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Care, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 3rd Floor West Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Dana Weiss
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Urology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Care, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 3rd Floor West Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Mark Zaontz
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Urology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Care, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 3rd Floor West Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Thomas Kolon
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Urology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Care, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 3rd Floor West Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Stephen Zderic
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Urology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Care, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 3rd Floor West Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Douglas Canning
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Urology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Care, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 3rd Floor West Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jason Van Batavia
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Urology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Care, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 3rd Floor West Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Aseem Shukla
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Urology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Care, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 3rd Floor West Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Arun Srinivasan
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Urology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Care, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 3rd Floor West Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zorrilla-Vaca A, Rice D, Brown JK, Antonoff M, Sepesi B, Hofstetter W, Swisher S, Walsh G, Vaporciyan A, Mehran R, Hagberg C, Mena GE. Sustained reduction of discharge opioid prescriptions in an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery program: A multilevel generalized linear model. Surgery 2021; 171:504-510. [PMID: 34740455 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs have been shown to effectively reduce opioid prescriptions at discharge after their implementation in several institutions, but little is known regarding the sustainability of this effect. Understanding opioid prescribing patterns after long-term implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery initiatives may help guide further opioid prescription reduction and improvements. Our group aimed to determine whether reductions in opioid prescriptions at discharge are sustained in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program for thoracic surgery. METHODS This retrospective cohort included 2,081 patients undergoing thoracic surgery within a 4-year Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program from March 2016 through April 2020. Our Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol included a standardized multimodal analgesic regimen (ie, preoperative gabapentin, tramadol, intercostal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine, and intraoperative acetaminophen, and ketorolac) and the rest of the interventions recommended by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery society guidelines. Our primary outcomes were the presence of opioid prescriptions at discharge (hydrocodone, hydromorphone, and oxycodone) and the total opioid amount prescribed (morphine equivalent daily dose). Multilevel generalized linear models were used to account for surgeon variabilities and types of thoracic resection. RESULTS Over the study period, the rate of opioid prescriptions at discharge reduced from 35% (Mar 2016) to 25% (Apr 2020), and the amount of opioid prescribed declined from 184 ± 321 morphine equivalent daily dose to 94 ± 251 morphine equivalent daily dose. In multilevel generalized linear models, there was a sustained downward trend in opioid prescriptions over the study period (β -11.8 morphine equivalent daily dose per year, P = .048), which was also directly correlated with the use of minimally invasive surgery (β -84.9 morphine equivalent daily dose for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, P < .001; β -139.2 morphine equivalent daily dose for robotic-assisted thoracic surgery, P < .001), intraoperative opioid administration (β -1.4 morphine equivalent daily dose per 1 morphine equivalent dose, P = .026), and the amount of postoperative acetaminophen (β -18.2 morphine equivalent daily dose per 1 g, P = .026). The sustained reduction of opioid prescriptions at discharge did not impact hospital readmission rates within 30 days (odds ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.59, P = .306). Subgroup analysis showed a significant, sustained decrease in hydromorphone (β -10.9 morphine equivalent daily dose per year, P = .004), but not for hydrocodone prescriptions (β -5.7 morphine equivalent daily dose per year, P = .168) or oxycodone (β +4.78 morphine equivalent daily dose per year, P = .183). CONCLUSION Our Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program for thoracic surgery contributed to a sustained reduction of opioid prescriptions at discharge, which positively correlated with the duration of its implementation and the use of minimally invasive surgical techniques but was negatively impacted by the amount of intraoperative opioid administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andres Zorrilla-Vaca
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - David Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jessica K Brown
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mara Antonoff
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Boris Sepesi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wayne Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephen Swisher
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Garrett Walsh
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ara Vaporciyan
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Reza Mehran
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Carin Hagberg
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gabriel E Mena
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|