'Not at all what I had expected': Discontinuing treatment with extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX): A qualitative study

Retention and dropout from sublingual and extended-release buprenorphine treatment: A comparative analysis of data from a nationally representative sample of commercially-insured people with opioid use disorder in the United States

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Maintenance on medications for opioid use disorder, particularly buprenorphine, is critical for reducing overdose risk and improving health outcomes in the United States. This study evaluates retention and dropout probabilities between sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) and extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) among commercially-insured individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD).

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective cohort study using Meretive™ Markeskan® claims data from 2019 to 2020. A multi-state Markov model assessed transitions between treatment states over 12 months.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included 58,933 individuals aged 18-64 years with OUD, initiating SL-BUP (n = 57,520) or XR-BUP (n = 1,413). XR-BUP patients were divided into XR-BUP only (n = 684; 49 %) and XR-BUP with supplemental SL-BUP (XR-BUP+sSL; n = 729; 51 %).

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcomes included probabilities of remaining in treatment or transitioning between states at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The impact of dosage and days of supply on retention was also examined.

RESULTS

The probability of permanent treatment dropout at 6 months was similar for SL-BUP (38.59 %, 95 % CI: 37.9 %-39.4 %) and XR-BUP (41.3 % 95 %CI: 36.8 %-46.1 %), yet the probability of remaining in treatment was significantly higher for SL-BUP than XR-BUP (49.5 %; 95 %CI: 48.8 %-50.1 % vs. 13.5 % 95 % CI: 10.5 %-16.5 %). The high proportion of individuals initially prescribed XR-BUP later transitioned to SL-BUP. Higher doses and longer days supplied of SL-BUP reduced dropout rates. Among patients receiving ≥16 mg/day and ≥28 days, dropout probabilities were 5.7 % (95 % CI: 5.4 %-6.0 %) at 1 month, 15.4 % (95 % CI: 14.8 %-16.2 %) at 3 months, 28.0 % (95 % CI: 26.9 %-29.2 %) at 6 months, and 47.8 % (95 %CI: 45.2 %-49.5 %) at 12 months. In contrast, patients prescribed <16 mg/day and <28 days had a 46.3 % (95 %CI: 45.0 %-47.6 %) dropout rate by 6 months.

CONCLUSION

SL-BUP demonstrates higher retention rates and lower dropout compared to XR-BUP in real-world settings. Optimizing SL-BUP dosing and providing extended supplies can improve retention and reduce treatment discontinuation.

Patient experience of opioid use disorder treatment medications: a systematic review of contemporary qualitative research

OBJECTIVES

Opioid agonist, partial agonist and antagonist medications are used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). This was the first omnibus narrative systematic review of the contemporary qualitative literature on patient experiences of receiving these medications.

DESIGN

Narrative systematic review using the sample, phenomenon of interest, design, evaluation and research framework.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase and APA PsycINFO were searched between 1 January 2000 and 14 June 2023, with the addition of hand searches.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Qualitative and mixed methods studies among adults with experience of receiving OUD treatment medication in community and criminal justice settings.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

One reviewer conducted searches using the pre-registered strategy. Two independent reviewers screened studies and assessed quality using the Consolidation Criteria for Reporting Qualitative tool. Identified reports were first categorised using domains from the addiction dimensions for assessment and personalised treatment (an instrument developed to guide OUD treatment planning), then by narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

From 1129 studies, 47 reports (published between 2005 and 2023) were included. Five major themes (and nine subthemes) were identified: (1) expectations about initiating treatment (barriers to access; motivations to receive medication); (2) responses to medication induction and stabilisation; (3) experience of the dispensing pharmacy (attending; medication dispensing); (4) experiences of maintenance treatment (services; dose adjustment; personal and social functioning); and (5) social factors (integration and stigma) and experiences of discontinuing treatment. Together these themes reflected and endorsed the importance of patient-centred care and clinically integrated services. Further qualitative research in real-world settings is needed on extended-release buprenorphine given the relative novelty of this medication option.

CONCLUSIONS

A narrative systematic review of the qualitative studies of medications for OUD endorsed the importance of patient-centred care and clinically integrated services.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019139365.

Patients with Opioid Use Disorder Choosing Treatment with Extended-Release Naltrexone: A 6-Month Naturalistic Study

INTRODUCTION

The treatment efficacy of extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) for opioid use disorder (OUD) has been demonstrated in several studies, but not in naturalistic settings where opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is freely accessible. This study aimed to examine the different treatment outcomes of XR-NTX in a setting where the participants freely chose XR-NTX as a treatment option instead of OAT.

METHODS

This was a 24-week open-label clinical prospective cohort study conducted in an outpatient setting at five hospitals in Norway. The study included 161 participants aged 18-65 years with OUD. Intramuscular injections of XR-NTX were administered every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. Measurements included retention in treatment, reasons for treatment discontinuation, days of use of opioids, other illicit substances and alcohol, level of heroin craving, treatment satisfaction, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Of 161 included participants, the mean age was 38 years, and 24% were women; 138 received at least one dose of the study medication (modified intention-to-treat [MITT] population), and mean time in treatment was 18.1 weeks (95% CI: 16.8-19.4). The majority of the MITT population (84; 60.9%) completed 24 weeks of treatment in the study. There was a significant decrease in the overall use of opioids (p < 0.001) and the use of alcohol, and other illicit substances were low. The participants generally reported high treatment satisfaction and low heroin cravings. Those who completed the 24 weeks of treatment reported significantly fewer days of opioid use (p < 0.001) and higher treatment satisfaction (p < 0.001) than those who discontinued treatment before 24 weeks. No serious AEs were directly related to XR-NTX use.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated high retention rates, decreased opioid use, and low use of other illicit substances and alcohol. Participants also reported low cravings for heroin and high treatment satisfaction. Completion of the full 24-week treatment resulted in lower opioid use and increased treatment satisfaction compared to those who discontinued treatment before 24 weeks. The observed higher retention and reduced opioid use, compared to other studies, may be attributed to participants' strong motivation for opioid abstinence facilitated by XR-NTX treatment.

'Matters-of-concern' associated with discontinuation of long-acting injectable buprenorphine: Findings from a longitudinal qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Discontinuation of medications such as methadone and buprenorphine amongst patients receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is an international phenomenon. Recent developments in OAT medication include depot-injections of buprenorphine. Circumstances underlying discontinuation of these new formulations of medication are not fully understood from a qualitative perspective.

METHODS

Data derive from a longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experience of long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB), involving semi-structured telephone-interviews held at six-points in time. The relevant dataset for this article consists of 44 interview transcripts, generated from 8 participants who were each affected by discontinuation of LAIB prescriptions (during the first 12-months of treatment). Analyses sought to identify circumstances associated with LAIB discontinuation and data were further situated within a framework of 'evidence making intervention' and associated 'matters-of-concern'. Matters-of-concern relate to the ways in which an intervention is 'made' and constructed through engagement and practice, from the perspective of the recipient.

FINDINGS

In this study, participants experienced either 'discontinuation of LAIB prescriptions by treatment services' or patient-led 'opt-out' from treatment. Matters-of-concern underlying the former were associated with late attendance for scheduled appointments, non-prescribed substance use or receiving a custodial sentence. Matters-of-concern relating to patient-initiated discontinuation were associated with personal circumstances that affected treatment motivation, side-effects (of buprenorphine), a preference to resume heroin use, or because individual treatment goals had been achieved.

CONCLUSION

The assorted matters-of-concern that influence discontinuation of LAIB demonstrate that such OAT is complex and multi-faceted, is neither fixed nor stable, and does not generate universally shared outcome. Experiences of LAIB discontinuation are shaped by a wide range of social, temporal and treatment-related effects that include disconnected therapeutic alliance between patient and treatment providers. In order to maximise the benefits of LAIB it is necessary to develop meaningful therapeutic alliances (notwithstanding policy boundaries) to enable exploration of matters-of-concern during treatment.

Critical access medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment facilities in the continental United States

Research objective

Medication opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment is the first-line approach to the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). This analysis seeks to identify "critical access" MOUD facilities that ensure geographic access for MOUD patients. Using public-source data and spatial analysis, we identify the top 100 "critical access" MOUD units across the continental U.S.

Study design

We use locational data from SAMHSA's Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator and DATA 2000 waiver buprenorphine providers. We identify the closest MOUDs to each ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA)'s geographic centroid. We then construct a difference-in-distance metric by computing the difference in this distance measure between closest and second-closest MOUD, multiplied by ZCTA population, ranking MOUDs by difference-distance scores.

Population studied

All listed MOUD treatment facilities and all listed ZCTA's across the continental U.S., and all listed MOUD providers proximate to these areas.

Principal findings

We identified the top 100 critical access MOUD units in the continental United States. Many critical providers were in rural areas in the central United States, as well as a band extending east from Texas to Georgia. Twenty-three of the top 100 critical access providers were identified as providing naltrexone. Seventy-seven were identified as providing buprenorphine. Three were identified as providing methadone.

Conclusions

Significant areas of the United States are dependent on a single critical access MOUD provider.

Implications for policy or practice

Place-based supports may be warranted to support MOUD treatment access in areas dependent upon critical access providers.

How do patients feel during the first 72 h after initiating long-acting injectable buprenorphine? An embodied qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB) is a new treatment for opioid use disorder that is generating positive outcomes. Negative effects are typically mild and transient, but can occasionally be serious, resulting in treatment discontinuation/non-adherence. This paper aims to analyse patients' accounts of how they felt during the first 72 h after initiating LAIB.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted (June 2021-March 2022) with 26 people (18 males and 8 females) who had started LAIB within the previous 72 h. Participants were recruited from treatment services in England and Wales and were interviewed by telephone using a topic guide. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and coded. The concepts of embodiment and embodied cognition framed the analyses. Data on participants' substance use, initiation onto LAIB and feelings were tabulated. Next, participants' accounts of how they felt were analysed following the stages of Iterative Categorization.

RESULTS

Participants reported complex combinations of changing negative and positive feelings. Bodily experiences included withdrawal symptoms, poor sleep, injection-site pain/soreness, lethargy and heightened senses inducing nausea ('distressed bodies'), but also enhanced somatic wellbeing, improved sleep, better skin, increased appetite, reduced constipation and heightened senses inducing pleasure ('returning body functions'). Cognitive responses included anxiety, uncertainties and low mood/depression ('the mind in crisis') and improved mood, greater positivity and reduced craving ('feeling psychologically better'). Whereas most negative effects reported are widely recognized, the early benefits of treatment described are less well-documented and may be an overlooked distinctive feature of LAIB.

CONCLUSIONS

During the first 72 h after initiating long-acting injectable buprenorphine, new patients report experiencing a range of interconnected positive and negative short-term effects. Providing new patients with information about the range and nature of these effects can prepare them for what to expect and help them manage feelings and reduce anxiety. In turn, this may increase medication adherence.

Experience and response to a randomised controlled trial of extended-release injectable buprenorphine versus sublingual tablet buprenorphine and oral liquid methadone for opioid use disorder: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a debilitating and persistent disorder. The standard-of-care treatment is daily maintenance dosing of sublingual buprenorphine (BUP-SL) or oral methadone (MET). Monthly, extended-release, subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine (BUP-XR) has been developed to enhance treatment effectiveness. This study aims to investigate the experiences of participants who have been offered BUP-XR (evaluation 1), health-related quality-of-life among participants who have opted to receive BUP-XR longer term (evaluation 2) and the experiences of participants allocated to receive BUP-XR or BUP-SL or MET with the offer of adjunctive personalised psychosocial intervention (evaluation 3).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Three qualitative-quantitative (mixed-methods) evaluations embedded in a five-centre, head-to-head, randomised controlled trial of BUP-XR versus BUP-SL and MET in the UK. Evaluation 1 is a four-centre interview anchored on an OUD-related topic guide and conducted after the 24-week trial endpoint. Evaluation 2 is a two-centre interview anchored on medications for opioid use disorder-specific quality-of-life topic guide conducted among participants after 12-24 months. Evaluation 3: single-centre interview after the 24-week trial endpoint. All evaluations include selected trial clinical measures, with evaluation 2 incorporating additional questionnaires. Target participant recruitment for evaluations 1 and 2 is 15 participants per centre (n=60 and n=30, respectively). Recruitment for evaluation 3 is 15 participants per treatment arm (n=30). Each evaluation will be underpinned by theory, drawing on constructs from the behavioural model for health service use or the health-related quality-of-life model. Qualitative data analysis will be by iterative categorisation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Study protocol, consent materials and questionnaires were approved by the London-Brighton and Sussex research ethics committee (reference: 19/LO/0483) and the Health Research Authority (IRAS project number 255522). Participants will be provided with information sheets and informed written consent will be obtained for each evaluation. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

2018-004460-63.

Impact of Impulsivity, Hyperactivity, and Inattention on Discontinuation Rate among Opioid-Dependent Patients Treated with Extended-Release Naltrexone

Previous studies have indicated elevated levels of impulsivity, hyperactivity, and inattention (IHI) among opioid-dependent patients seeking outpatient treatment with extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX). This led us to hypothesize that IHI may be associated with a higher discontinuation rate for XR-NTX treatment. In a group of 162 patients with opioid dependence, discontinuation prior to the full 24 weeks of the study period (six injections and attending the study visit at 24 weeks) occurred in 49% of the patients, primarily in the early stage of treatment. IHI above the clinical cut-off on the adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS) was not associated with a risk of premature discontinuation. This finding was not altered when controlling for socio-demographics, substance, use and mental health severity. Conclusively, high levels of IHI per se is not contradictive for XR-NTX treatment in regard to concern for premature discontinuation.

Patients' experiences of continued treatment with extended-release naltrexone: a Norwegian qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The opioid antagonist extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) in the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) is effective in terms of safety, abstinence from opioid use and retention in treatment. However, it is unclear how patients experience and adjust to losing the possibility of achieving an opioid effect. This qualitative study is the first to explore how people with opioid dependence experience XR-NTX treatment, focusing on the process of treatment over time.

METHODS

Using a purposive sampling strategy, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 19 persons with opioid use disorder (15 men, four women, 22-55 years of age) participating in a clinical trial of XR-NTX in Norway. The interviewees had received at least three XR-NTX injections. Qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach was used.

FINDINGS

Participants described that XR-NTX treatment had many advantages. However they still faced multiple challenges, some of which they were not prepared for. Having to find a new foothold and adapt to no longer gaining an effect from opioids due to the antagonist medication was challenging. This was especially true for those struggling emotionally and transitioning into the harmful use of non-opioid substances. Additional support was considered crucial. Even so, the treatment led to an opportunity to participate in society and reclaim identity. Participants had strong goals for the future and described that XR-NTX enabled a more meaningful life. Expectations of a better life could however turn into broken hopes. Although participants were largely optimistic about the future, thinking about the end of treatment could cause apprehension.

CONCLUSIONS

XR-NTX treatment offers freedom from opioids and can facilitate the recovery process for people with OUD. However, our findings also highlight several challenges associated with XR-NTX treatment, emphasizing the importance of monitoring emotional difficulties and increase of non-opioid substances during treatment. As opioid abstinence in itself does not necessarily equal recovery, our findings underscore the importance of seeing XR-NTX as part of a comprehensive, individualized treatment approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT03647774, first Registered: Aug 28, 2018.

Treatment outcomes associated with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) among criminal justice-referred admissions to residential treatment in the U.S., 2015-2018

AIMS

To examine the use and association of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) with treatment completion and retention for criminal justice referred (CJR) admissions to residential treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the Treatment Episode Dataset-Discharge (TEDS-D; 2015-2018) for adults (N = 205,348) admitted to short-term (ST) (< 30 days) or long-term (LT) (>30 days) residential treatment for OUD. Outcomes were MOUD in treatment plans, and treatment completion and retention (ST >10 days; LT > 90 days). Logistic regression analyses were conducted separately for ST and LT settings.

RESULTS

CJR admissions were less likely to have MOUD than non-CJR admissions (ST, 11% vs. 21%; LT, 10% vs. 24%, respectively) and were more likely to complete and be retained in treatment. In ST settings, MOUD was associated with higher likelihood of treatment completion and retention. In LT settings, MOUD was associated with higher likelihood of treatment retention and lower likelihood of treatment completion. These associations tended to be slightly weaker for CJR admissions, with the exception of treatment completion in LT settings, but the moderating effect size of CJR status in all models was very small. Small differences in the moderating effect of CJR status by race and ethnicity were observed in LT settings.

CONCLUSIONS

MOUD is greatly under-utilized for CJR patients, and given that MOUD was associated with positive outcomes, there is a critical need to find ways to increase access to MOUD for CJR patients in residential treatment. Race and ethnicity appear to have relatively little impact on outcomes.