A three-dimensional analysis of humeral head retroversion

The Influence of Component Design and Positioning on Soft-Tissue Tensioning and Complications in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Review

» Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was designed to function in the rotator cuff deficient shoulder by adjusting the glenohumeral center of rotation (COR) to maximize deltoid function.» Adjustments in the COR ultimately lead to changes in resting tension of the deltoid and remaining rotator cuff, which can affect implant stability and risk of stress fracture.» Soft-tissue balance and complication profiles can be affected by humeral component (version, neck shaft angle, and inlay vs. onlay) and glenoid component (sagittal placement, version, inclination, and lateralization) design and application.» A good understanding of the effects on soft-tissue balance and complication profile is critical for surgeons to best provide optimal patient outcomes.

The bicipital groove as a landmark for humeral version reference during shoulder arthroplasty: a computed tomography study of normal humeral rotation

BACKGROUND

Accurate reproduction of humeral version is important in shoulder arthroplasty. Traditional referencing relative to the transepicondylar axis (TEA) is prone to error as it is absent on preoperative imaging and inaccurately reproduced intraoperatively. The bicipital groove is present on preoperative imaging and in the operative field and thus may be a useful landmark for accurate reproduction of humeral version.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two trained observers analyzed 101 full-humerus computed tomography scans of patients undergoing a myeloma screening protocol. Measurements of humeral retroversion relative to the TEA (angle A), humeral articular axis retroversion relative to the bicipital groove (angle B), and the bicipital groove axis relative to the TEA (angle C) were made with comparison of the measurement properties of each.

RESULTS

Humeral retroversion relative to the TEA was 23.7° ± 8° (range, 0.2°-48.7°; 95% confidence interval, 22°-26°). The humeral articular axis was retroverted to the bicipital groove axis (angle B) by 33.5° ± 9.4° (range, 15.5°-61.7°; 95% confidence interval, 32°-35°). Overall inter-rater reliability was 0.88.

DISCUSSION

Measurement of humeral head retroversion relative to the bicipital groove is not inferior to the gold-standard measurement. The bicipital groove is present both on preoperative imaging and in the operative field, making it a potential reference landmark for accurate reproduction of humeral version in shoulder arthroplasty.

The outcome of soft-tissue release and tendon transfer in shoulders with brachial plexus birth palsy

Background

Shoulder involvement in brachial plexus birth palsy is common, and the adduction, internal rotation contracture deformity often requires some form of surgical treatment. There are very few long-term reports on release of contracted muscles and tendon transfers, especially in older children. We are reporting the single-center results of such a surgery with detailed outcome analysis.

Methods

The prospectively collected data from brachial plexus birth palsy cases who had undergone contracture release and tendon transfer were retrospectively studied and examined. The new Mallet and functional scores were compared with the original data forms and then analyzed. The radiographic evidence of glenoid dysplasia and its correlation with age and functional outcome was assessed.

Results

A total of 82 cases with surgery at mean age of 9.5 ± 5.09 years and a follow-up of 8 ± 3.8 (3-20) years entered the study. Of these, 56% of cases had 7 to 20 years of age at surgery. Fifty-four (66%) patients had only shoulder surgery, and 28 (34%) required additional reconstructive surgeries for hand and wrist. Moderate to severe glenohumeral dysplasia was present in 38%. The preoperative Mallet score of 10.6 ± 2.97 improved to 19.3 ± 3.39 (P < .001). Eighty-one percent of patients showed improvement in “reaching face” functions, 71% in “above head” functions, and 74% in “midline functions.” The cases with lack of improvement in midline function mostly belonged to pan-plexus injuries. Noticeable subjective and objective improvement was also observed in cases with glenohumeral dysplasia in their Mallet and functional scores (P < .001). The improvement in function and subjective satisfaction of 92% was observed irrespective of age at surgery.

Conclusion

Soft-tissue release and tendon transfer for brachial plexus birth palsy shoulder can improve function and limb appearance even in older children and young adults and even in the presence of glenohumeral dysplasia.

Geometric analysis of the humeral head and glenoid in the Indian population and its clinical significance

BACKGROUND

Total anatomic and reverse shoulder prostheses are designed to match the dimensions of the native bony anatomy. Chinese and Japanese bony dimensions of the shoulder have been found to be different from that of the Caucasian population. We hypothesized that the geometric dimensions of the humeral head and glenoid in the Indian population would also be different from that of the Caucasian population.

METHOD

Fifty patients underwent computerized tomographic scans of their normal shoulders. We calculated the superoinferior (SI) diameter of the humeral head, anteroposterior diameter of the humeral head, radius of curvature of the humeral head, humeral head retroversion, humeral head thickness, inclination angle, critical shoulder angle, greater tuberosity angle, glenoid width, glenoid length, radius of curvature of the glenoid, glenoid inclination angle, and glenoid version.

RESULTS

The radius of curvature of the humeral head averaged 22.9 ± 1.7 mm, the articular surface thickness 17.1 ± 1.6 mm, and the SI diameter 42.3 ± 3 mm. The SI diameter strongly correlated with the thickness (r = 0.617, P = .001). The anteroposterior/SI articular surface diameter ratio averaged 0.9 ± 0.9, the articular surface thickness/radius of curvature ratio 0.7 ± 0.9, the inclination angle 133.8 ± 6.4, and the retroversion angle 33.5° ± 8.5°. The radius of curvature of the glenoid averaged 23.3 ± 3.4 mm, the glenoid width 24.0 ± 2 mm, the SI length 31.3 ± 2.2 mm, the glenoid inclination angle 78.7° ± 4.8°, and the glenoid retroversion 1.8° ± 3.8°.

DISCUSSION

Compared with the Western population, our cohort had a smaller humeral radius of curvature (P = .04), smaller articular surface diameter (P = .001), smaller inclination angle (P = .003), larger retroversion angle of the humeral head (P < .001), and smaller glenoid length and width (P < .0001). Most of the implant companies did not have smaller sized combinations of humeral heads with thickness to match our population. The glenoid width of females in our cohort was found to be smaller for the smallest size of the glenoid base plate.

CONCLUSION

Smaller sized options in humeral head diameter and thickness of the anatomic prosthesis and glenoid baseplate of the reverse shoulder prosthesis need to be made available to suit our population and avoid a mismatch.

The glenoid and humeral head in shoulder osteoarthritis: A comprehensive review

The key management of glenohumeral osteoarthritis is shoulder arthroplasty which aims to reduce pain and restore full shoulder function: it has increased in recent years. A detailed understanding of the anatomy of the glenoid and humeral head, as well as morphological changes of the glenoid in osteoarthritis, are important factors to consider when deciding on replacement components. This review begins with a brief introduction of the glenohumeral joint itself, and then considers the detailed anatomy of the glenoid fossa and humeral head, both of which are reported to have variable morphology. Several studies have been undertaken to assess various parameters, especially of the glenoid fossa including its shape, height, width, and articular surface area, version and inclination, in an attempt to define a standard classification that can be applied to surgical intervention. Nevertheless, no definitive consensus concerning the classification of these morphologies has been forthcoming, hence the need for this review. Following a consideration of these morphologies, the current state of knowledge regarding glenoid deformity in osteoarthritis, as well as its surgical management, is considered.

An interpopulation comparison of 3-dimensional morphometric measurements of the proximal humerus

Background

Precise anatomic reconstruction of the proximal humerus is essential to a favorable outcome of total shoulder arthroplasty. Because of the wide variation in the geometric features of the proximal humerus, prosthetic designs incorporating these disparities are being developed.

Methods

The aim of this study is to use data obtained from cadavers and computed tomographic scans to investigate the 3-dimensional morphometric parameters of the proximal humerus of South African and Swiss samples and make an interpopulation comparison. In addition, the study combines the interarticular variations between populations with the differences in sex and shoulder sides. With the aid of medical imaging techniques and engineering design tools, various geometric features were measured.

Results

The results obtained from these analyses revealed several differences in sex and shoulder sides. On average, the Swiss were larger in most of the measured parameters than the South Africans. The male shoulders of Swiss and South Africans were observed to significantly vary in 4 of the parameters measured. The South African male and female right shoulders varied considerably in one-fourth of the measured shoulder variables. Generally, for both populations, the left and right shoulders of the same individuals were not different in all the measured variables irrespective of sex.

Conclusion

The knowledge acquired in this study is expected to assist in the development of a population-specific shoulder prosthetic design and surgical planning procedures.

Humeral Retroversion (Complexity of Assigning Reference Axes in 3D and Its Influence on Measurement): A Technical Note

Background

Humeral retroversion (RV) is important to the study of shoulder function and reconstruction. This study tests the hypothesis that clinically obtained computer tomography (CT) measurements for humeral RV (off-axis measurements) differ from those obtained after reformatting the image slice orientation so that the humeral shaft is perpendicular to the gantry (coaxial measurements) and explores deviations from true RV.

Materials and methods

A custom-built application created in Mathematica was used to explore the effect of altering the humeral orientation on slice angle acquisition by 3D imaging technologies, on the perceived angle of RV from the 2D-projection of the reference axes. The application allows for control of humeral axis orientation relative to image slice (3D) or plain of projection (2D) and humeral rotation. The effect of rotating a virtual model of one humerus around its own axis and in discrete anatomical directions on the measured RV angle was assessed.

Results

The coaxial measurement of humeral RV (31.2°) differed from off-axis measurement, with a maximum difference in measured RV of 50° in 45° of extension. The typical position of the humerus in a CT scan resulted in a difference in RV measurement up to 22°. Explorations of deviation led to the following outcomes, as divided by anatomic direction. Extension and abduction led to an underestimation, and flexion and adduction led to an overestimation of the RV-angle.

Conclusion

Measurements must be done consistently about the position and orientation of the humerus. Deviation in the humeral alignment of as little as 10° can distort the measurement of version up to 15°.

How to cite this article

van de Bunt F, Pearl ML, van Noort A. Humeral Retroversion (Complexity of Assigning Reference Axes in 3D and Its Influence on Measurement): A Technical Note. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(2):69-73.

Humeral retroversion and shoulder muscle changes in infants with internal rotation contractures following brachial plexus birth palsy

AIM

To examine humeral retroversion in infants who sustained brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBI) and suffered from an internal rotation contracture. Additionally, the role of the infraspinatus (IS) and subscapularis (SSc) muscles in the genesis of this bony deformation is explored.

METHODS

Bilateral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 35 infants (age range: 2-7 mo old) with BPBI were retrospectively analyzed. Retroversion was measured according to two proximal axes and one distal axis (transepicondylar axis). The proximal axes were: (1) the perpendicular line to the borders of the articular surface (humeral centerline); and (2) the longest diameter through the humeral head. Muscle cross-sectional areas of the IS and SSc muscles were measured on the MRI-slides representing the largest muscle belly. The difference in retroversion was correlated with the ratio of muscle-sizes and passive external rotation measurements.

RESULTS

Retroversion on the involved side was significantly decreased, 1.0° vs 27.6° (1) and 8.5° vs 27.2° (2), (P < 0.01), as compared to the uninvolved side. The size of the SSc and IS muscles on the involved side was significantly decreased, 2.26 cm² vs 2.79 cm² and 1.53 cm² vs 2.19 cm², respectively (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the muscle ratio (SSc/IS) at the involved side was significantly smaller compared to the uninvolved side (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Even in our youngest patient population, humeral retroversion has a high likelihood of being decreased. Altered humeral retroversion warrants attention as a structural change in any child being evaluated for the treatment of an internal rotation contracture.

A 3D comparison of humeral head retroversion by sex and measurement technique

BACKGROUND

Accurate humeral head reconstruction during shoulder arthroplasty is partially dependent on correctly estimating and replicating native version. The present study evaluated the effects of sex and measurement technique on three-dimensional (3D) humeral version measurements made using the transepicondylar, forearm and flexion-extension axes.

METHODS

Fifty-two full-arm computed tomography scans were converted to 3D models and geometry extracted to define landmarks and coordinate systems. An anatomic humeral head osteotomy plane was used to measure version relative to the three measurement techniques and compare between sexes.

RESULTS

The measurement technique used had a significant affect (p < 0.001) on the resulting version measurement. The forearm axis technique consistently resulted in higher measured version compared to either the flexion-extension [mean (SD) males 9° (4°), females 13° (5°), p < 0.001] or the transepicondylar axes [mean (SD) males 8° (4°), females 11° (4°), p < 0.001]. Version in males was 7° greater than females when referencing either the flexion-extension [p = 0.029; mean (SD) males 37.7° (11°), females 30.4° (13°)] or transepicondylar axes [p = 0.045; mean (SD) males 39° (11°), females 32° (12°)].

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of measurement technique can affect the humeral version angle. These results are important because measuring version using the epicondyles pre-operatively, and subsequently the forearm intra-operatively, will result in approximately 10° under-retroverted osteotomy. For example, 0° neutral version cut during reverse arthroplasty measured referencing the forearm results in 10° anteverted osteotomy when referencing the distal humerus.

Prediction of the pre-morbid 3D anatomy of the proximal humerus based on statistical shape modelling

Aims

Restoring the pre-morbid anatomy of the proximal humerus is a goal of anatomical shoulder arthroplasty, but reliance is placed on the surgeon’s experience and on anatomical estimations. The purpose of this study was to present a novel method, ‘Statistical Shape Modelling’, which accurately predicts the pre-morbid proximal humeral anatomy and calculates the 3D geometric parameters needed to restore normal anatomy in patients with severe degenerative osteoarthritis or a fracture of the proximal humerus.

Materials and Methods

From a database of 57 humeral CT scans 3D humeral reconstructions were manually created. The reconstructions were used to construct a statistical shape model (SSM), which was then tested on a second set of 52 scans. For each humerus in the second set, 3D reconstructions of four diaphyseal segments of varying lengths were created. These reconstructions were chosen to mimic severe osteoarthritis, a fracture of the surgical neck of the humerus and a proximal humeral fracture with diaphyseal extension. The SSM was then applied to the diaphyseal segments to see how well it predicted proximal morphology, using the actual proximal humeral morphology for comparison.

Results

With the metaphysis included, mimicking osteoarthritis, the errors of prediction for retroversion, inclination, height, radius of curvature and posterior and medial offset of the head of the humerus were 2.9° (± 2.3°), 4.0° (± 3.3°), 1.0 mm (± 0.8 mm), 0.8 mm (± 0.6 mm), 0.7 mm (± 0.5 mm) and 1.0 mm (± 0.7 mm), respectively. With the metaphysis excluded, mimicking a fracture of the surgical neck, the errors of prediction for retroversion, inclination, height, radius of curvature and posterior and medial offset of the head of the humerus were 3.8° (± 2.9°), 3.9° (± 3.4°), 2.4 mm (± 1.9 mm), 1.3 mm (± 0.9 mm), 0.8 mm (± 0.5 mm) and 0.9 mm (± 0.6 mm), respectively.

Conclusion

This study reports a novel, computerised method that accurately predicts the pre-morbid proximal humeral anatomy even in challenging situations. This information can be used in the surgical planning and operative reconstruction of patients with severe degenerative osteoarthritis or with a fracture of the proximal humerus. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:927–33.

Measurement Methods for Humeral Retroversion Using Two-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans: Which Is Most Concordant with the Standard Method?

BACKGROUND

Humeral retroversion is variable among individuals, and there are several measurement methods. This study was conducted to compare the concordance and reliability between the standard method and 5 other measurement methods on two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) scans.

METHODS

CT scans from 21 patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty (19 women and 2 men; mean age, 70.1 years [range, 42 to 81 years]) were analyzed. The elbow transepicondylar axis was used as a distal reference. Proximal reference points included the central humeral head axis (standard method), the axis of the humeral center to 9 mm posterior to the posterior margin of the bicipital groove (method 1), the central axis of the bicipital groove -30° (method 2), the base axis of the triangular shaped metaphysis +2.5° (method 3), the distal humeral head central axis +2.4° (method 4), and contralateral humeral head retroversion (method 5). Measurements were conducted independently by two orthopedic surgeons.

RESULTS

The mean humeral retroversion was 31.42° ± 12.10° using the standard method, and 29.70° ± 11.66° (method 1), 30.64° ± 11.24° (method 2), 30.41° ± 11.17° (method 3), 32.14° ± 11.70° (method 4), and 34.15° ± 11.47° (method 5) for the other methods. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reliability exceeded 0.75 for all methods. On the test to evaluate the equality of the standard method to the other methods, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of method 2 and method 4 were different from the ICC of the standard method in surgeon A (p < 0.05), and the ICCs of method 2 and method 3 were different form the ICC of the standard method in surgeon B (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Humeral version measurement using the posterior margin of the bicipital groove (method 1) would be most concordant with the standard method even though all 5 methods showed excellent agreements.

Humeral head osteotomy in shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison between anterosuperior and inferoanterior resection techniques

BACKGROUND

The best chance that a shoulder arthroplasty will restore motion and muscle balance across the glenohumeral joint is by closely replicating natural articular morphology. Defining the humeral osteotomy plane along clear landmarks at the anatomic neck is critical. We hypothesized that a new osteotomy, based on alternative landmarks on the anatomic neck, would restore 3-dimensional humeral head morphology more reliably than the traditional osteotomy.

METHODS

The anatomic neck was digitized in 30 human cadaver shoulders and compared with its 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction. Two different osteotomy techniques were virtually performed: the traditional, following the anterosuperior anatomic neck; and a new technique, defined by the inferoanterior anatomic neck. The length-width difference and orientation (retroversion, inclination) of the resection area were compared between the techniques and with native anatomy.

RESULTS

Length-width difference of the anterosuperior resection area was higher than in the inferoanterior osteotomy (6 ± 2 mm vs. 3 ± 1 mm; P < .001). Retroversion of the anterosuperior resection plane was higher than the native head (50° ± 12° vs. 37° ± 11°; P < .001), whereas retroversion after the inferoanterior osteotomy (32° ± 12°) did not differ from native (P = .057). Inclination differed after the anterosuperior osteotomy (129° ± 5°) and the inferoanterior osteotomy (127° ± 4°) compared with the native head (134° ± 4°; P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSION

The inferoanterior referenced osteotomy generated a more circular resection area, matching the native humeral head retroversion more closely than in the anterosuperior technique. This study suggests that in shoulder arthroplasty, the humeral resection level should be referenced at the inferoanterior rather than the anterosuperior anatomic neck. Further studies should investigate the biomechanical effects of this alternative resection plane.

Distinct Proximal Humeral Geometry in Chinese Population and Clinical Relevance

BACKGROUND

Replicating humeral anatomy during shoulder arthroplasty is important for good patient outcomes. The proximal humeral geometry of the Chinese population has been rarely reported. We analyzed the geometry of the proximal part of the humerus in Chinese subjects and compared it with that of Western populations and the dimensions of available prostheses.

METHODS

Eighty healthy Chinese subjects underwent computed tomography (CT)-arthrography. Three-dimensional (3D) digital humeral and glenoid models were reconstructed, and geometric parameters were measured. Humeral measurements included the radius of curvature, articular surface diameter and thickness, anterior-posterior/superior-inferior (AP/SI) articular surface diameter ratio, articular surface thickness/radius of curvature ratio, surface arc, inclination angle, retroversion angle, and medial and posterior offsets. Glenoid measurements included SI length, AP length, SI radius, and AP radius.

RESULTS

The average radius of curvature (and standard deviation) of the humeral head was 22.1 ± 1.9 mm, the articular surface diameter averaged 42.9 ± 3.6 mm, and the articular surface thickness averaged 16.9 ± 1.5 mm. There was strong linear correlation between the articular surface diameter and thickness (r = 0.696, p = 0.001), with a linear regression relationship of thickness = 0.357 × diameter + 1.615. The AP/SI articular surface diameter ratio averaged 0.93 ± 0.03; the articular surface thickness/radius of curvature ratio, 0.77 ± 0.05; the surface arc, 153° ± 5.6°; the inclination angle, 133° ± 3.1°; and the retroversion angle, 22.6° ± 10.2°. The medial and posterior offsets averaged 6.3 ± 0.9 mm and 0.4 ± 0.78 mm, respectively; the SI and AP lengths, 30.15 ± 3.70 mm and 20.35 ± 2.56 mm; and the SI and AP radii, 23.49 ± 2.48 mm and 25.54 ± 3.07 mm. Compared with the Western population, the Chinese cohort had a smaller radius of curvature (p < 0.001), smaller articular surface diameter (p = 0.009), larger articular surface thickness/radius of curvature ratio (p < 0.001), larger surface arc (p < 0.001), smaller inclination angle (p < 0.001), and smaller posterior offset (p < 0.001). Unlike the Western population, the Chinese population had higher glenohumeral conformity in the coronal plane than in the axial plane. Many manufacturers' shoulder prostheses do not adequately cover the range of humeral head dimensions in our Chinese cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The geometric parameters of the humeri in the Chinese population differ from those in other populations. These differences have clinical relevance with regard to implant design and arthroplasty technique and likely affect clinical outcomes.

Humeral Retroversion in Children with Shoulder Internal Rotation Contractures Secondary to Upper-Trunk Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy

BACKGROUND

The most common sequela of neonatal brachial plexus palsy is an internal rotation contracture of the shoulder that impairs function and leads to skeletal deformation of the glenohumeral joint. Treatment options include release, transfers, and humeral osteotomy, all ultimately striving for better function through increased external rotation. Prior studies have shown that neonatal brachial plexus palsy alters humeral retroversion but with conflicting findings. We studied retroversion in children with internal rotation contractures from neonatal brachial plexus palsy to clarify its effect on version and surgical planning.

METHODS

Bilateral shoulder and elbow magnetic resonance imaging scans of 21 children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy were retrospectively analyzed. Retroversion referenced to the transepicondylar line at the elbow was measured with respect to 2 different proximal reference axes, the longest diameter of an axial cut of the proximal part of the humerus (the skew axis) and the line perpendicular to the articular surface (the humeral center line). Glenoid version and glenohumeral morphology type (concentric glenoid, posterior-concentric glenoid, biconcave, or pseudoglenoid) were also determined. All geometric variables were assessed for correlation with patient age and the severity of the internal rotation contracture.

RESULTS

Retroversion on the involved side was decreased at 6° compared with 19° (p = 0.003), as measured between the skew axis and transepicondylar line. Retroversion referenced to the humeral center line was also decreased at -2° (anteversion) compared with 20° (p < 0.001). Patient age was inversely correlated with retroversion, but was only significant for the skew axis (r = -0.497, p = 0.022), decreasing in linear regression by 2.4° per year (p = 0.038). Humeral retroversion did not correlate with the severity of the internal rotation contracture, glenoid version, or glenoid morphology type.

CONCLUSIONS

Humeral retroversion is likely to be less on the affected side in children with internal rotation contractures from upper trunk neonatal brachial plexus palsy and merits consideration in surgical planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A comparison of normal and osteoarthritic humeral head size and morphology

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and to compare the size and morphologic patterns among normal and osteoarthritic (OA) humeral heads.

METHODS

This comparative anatomic imaging study evaluated 150 humeral heads that were separated into 3 cohorts: normal, OA with symmetric glenoid erosion, and OA with asymmetric (type B2) glenoid erosion. Three-dimensional models were created of the humeral head from computed tomography data, and point coordinates were extracted for evaluation. Parameters measured were diameter (sphere fit and circle fit), chord distance (superoinferior and anteroposterior), and humeral head height.

RESULTS

The sphere-fit diameter of the humeral head for the entire OA cohort (100 patients; mean diameter, 59 ± 9 mm) was significantly greater (P < .001) than that of the normal cohort (50 patients; mean diameter, 49 ± 5 mm). Similarly, the humeral head circle-fit diameters in the superoinferior and anteroposterior planes were significantly greater (P < .001) in the combined OA cohorts (59 ± 9 mm and 56 ± 10 mm, respectively) compared with the normal cohort (51 ± 5 mm and 47 ± 5 mm, respectively). However, there were no significant differences (P ≥ .099) between the symmetric and asymmetric OA cohorts in sphere-fit or circle-fit diameters. The mean values of humeral head heights were not significantly different (P = .382) between cohorts, 19 ± 2 mm, 18 ± 2 mm, and 18 ± 2 mm for the normal, symmetric, and asymmetric cohorts, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Although OA humeral head morphology varies significantly from normal, it does not vary as a function of the Walch classification between symmetric and asymmetric glenoids. Understanding of the morphologic variability of the pathologic humeral head may provide insight into the pathoanatomy of osteoarthritis and the development of various erosion patterns.

Computer algorithms for three-dimensional measurement of humeral anatomy: analysis of 140 paired humeri

BACKGROUND

In the presence of severe osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, or proximal humeral fracture, the contralateral humerus may serve as a template for the 3-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning of reconstructive surgery. The purpose of this study was to develop algorithms for performing 3D measurements of the humeral anatomy and further to assess side-to-side (bilateral) differences in humeral head retrotorsion, humeral head inclination, humeral length, and humeral head radius and height.

METHODS

The 3D models of 140 paired humeri (70 cadavers) were extracted from computed tomographic data. Geometric characteristics quantifying the humeral anatomy in 3D were determined in a semiautomatic fashion using the developed computer algorithms. The results between the sides were compared for evaluating bilateral differences.

RESULTS

The mean bilateral difference of the humeral retrotorsion angle was 6.7° (standard deviation [SD], 5.7°; range, -15.1° to 24.0°; P = .063); the mean side difference of the humeral head inclination angle was 2.3° (SD, 1.8°; range, -5.1° to 8.4°; P = .12). The side difference in humeral length (mean, 2.9 mm; SD, 2.5 mm; range, -8.7 mm to 10.1 mm; P = .04) was significant. The mean side difference in the head sphere radius was 0.5 mm (SD, 0.6 mm; range, -3.2 mm to 2.2 mm; P = .76), and the mean side difference in humeral head height was 0.8 mm (SD, 0.6 mm; range, -2.4 mm to 2.4 mm; P = .44).

CONCLUSIONS

The contralateral anatomy may serve as a reliable reconstruction template for humeral length, humeral head radius, and humeral head height if it is analyzed with 3D algorithms. In contrast, determining humeral head retrotorsion and humeral head inclination from the contralateral anatomy may be more prone to error.

Reliability and validity in measurement of true humeral retroversion by a three-dimensional cylinder fitting method

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND

Humeral retroversion is defined as the orientation of the humeral head relative to the distal humerus. Because none of the previous methods used to measure humeral retroversion strictly follow this definition, values obtained by these techniques vary and may be biased by morphologic variations of the humerus. The purpose of this study was 2-fold: to validate a method to define the axis of the distal humerus with a virtual cylinder and to establish the reliability of 3-dimensional (3D) measurement of humeral retroversion by this cylinder fitting method.

METHODS

Humeral retroversion in 14 baseball players (28 humeri) was measured by the 3D cylinder fitting method. The root mean square error was calculated to compare values obtained by a single tester and by 2 different testers using the embedded coordinate system. To establish the reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and precision (standard error of measurement [SEM]) were calculated.

RESULTS

The root mean square errors for the humeral coordinate system were <1.0 mm/1.0° for comparison of all translations/rotations obtained by a single tester and <1.0 mm/2.0° for comparison obtained by 2 different testers. Assessment of reliability and precision of the 3D measurement of retroversion yielded an intratester ICC of 0.99 (SEM, 1.0°) and intertester ICC of 0.96 (SEM, 2.8°).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The error in measurements obtained by a distal humerus cylinder fitting method was small enough not to affect retroversion measurement. The 3D measurement of retroversion by this method provides excellent intratester and intertester reliability.

Conventional Humeral Retroversion Measurements Using Computed Tomography Slices or Ultrasound Images Are Not Correlated With the 3-Dimensional Humeral Retroversion Angle

Background:

Humeral retroversion angles determined by previous techniques are varied and/or biased by morphologic variations of the proximal and distal humerus, and their validity should be revisited. To overcome the limitations of previous studies associated with 2-dimensional (2D) images and the reference axes, a 3-dimensional (3D) measurement of humeral retroversion is required. However, comparisons of 2D imaging methods with the 3D computed tomography (CT) measurement as a reference standard have not been heretofore performed.

Purpose:

To determine whether the 3D CT humeral retroversion angle in baseball players is correlated with conventional humeral retroversion measurements.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

A total of 28 humeri from 14 male baseball players were used for measuring humeral retroversion. Participants underwent CT scans, and geometric bone models were created for measuring the 3D CT humeral retroversion angle. Using CT slices, the 2D CT humeral retroversion angle was also determined. Bicipital forearm angle was assessed using the indirect ultrasound technique. Linear regressions and Bland-Altman plots were used to determine whether there were agreements among 3 variables: the 3D CT retroversion, 2D CT retroversion, and bicipital forearm angles.

Results:

In linear regression analyses, the 3D humeral retroversion angle was not predicted by the 2D CT retroversion (R = 0.167, R² = 0.028, P = .395) or the bicipital forearm angle (R = 0.049, R² = 0.002, P = .805). The bias of these 2 methods was 20.9° and –15.3°, respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated that the bicipital forearm angle was a significant predictor of the 2D CT retroversion angle (R = 0.632, R² = 0.400, P < .001).

Conclusion:

The 3D CT humeral retroversion angle was found to be underestimated by the 2D CT retroversion angle and overestimated by the bicipital forearm angle obtained by the indirect ultrasound, although a previously observed relationship between the 2D CT retroversion and bicipital forearm angles was confirmed.

Clinical Relevance:

Precise measurement of humeral retroversion angle is important because retroversion has been linked to upper extremity disorders, including throwing-related shoulder and elbow disorders in baseball players.

A novel osteotomy in shoulder joint replacement based on analysis of the cartilage/metaphyseal interface

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of reconstruction is thought to impact on functional outcome following glenohumeral joint arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to define an area of minimal anatomic variation at the cartilage/metaphyseal interface of the proximal humerus to optimize the osteotomy of the humeral head, enabling accurate reconstruction with a prosthetic component.

METHODS

Hand held digitization and 3D surface laser scanning techniques were used to digitize 24 cadaveric arms and determine the normal geometry. Each humeral head was then examined to identify the most consistent anatomical landmarks for the ideal osteotomy plane to optimize humeral component positioning.

FINDINGS

The novel, posterior referencing, osteotomy resulted in a mean increase in retroversion of only 0.4° when compared to the original geometry. A traditional anterior referencing osteotomy, by comparison, produced a mean increase in retroversion of 11°. In addition, the novel osteotomy only increased axial diameter by 0.71mm and head height by 0.02mm compared to an anterior referencing osteotomy (3.0mm and 2.7mm respectively).

INTERPRETATION

The traditional osteotomy, referencing the anterior border of the cartilage/metaphyseal interface potentially resulted in an increase in prosthetic head size and retroversion. The novel osteotomy, referencing from the posterior cartilage/metaphyseal interface enabled a more accurate recovery of head geometry. Importantly, the increase in retroversion created by the traditional osteotomy was not replicated with the novel technique. Referencing from the posterior cartilage/metaphyseal interface produced a more reliable osteotomy, more closely matching the original humeral geometry.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Basic Science, Anatomic study, Computer model.

Three-dimensional humeral morphologic alterations and atrophy associated with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy

BACKGROUND

Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) is a common birth injury, resulting in severe functional losses. Yet, little is known about how OBPP affects the 3-dimensional (3D) humeral morphology. Thus, the purpose of this study was to measure the 3D humeral architecture in children with unilateral OBPP.

METHODS

Thirteen individuals (4 female and 9 male patients; mean age, 11.8 ± 3.3 years; mean Mallet score, 15.1 ± 3.0) participated in this institutional review board approved study. A 3D T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo magnetic resonance image set was acquired for both upper limbs (involved and noninvolved). Humeral size, version, and inclination were quantified from 3D humeral models derived from these images.

RESULTS

The involved humeral head was significantly less retroverted and in declination (medial humeral head pointed anteriorly and inferiorly) relative to the noninvolved side. Osseous atrophy was present in all 3 dimensions and affected the entire humerus. The inter-rater reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.96-1.00).

DISCUSSION

This study showed that both humeral atrophy and bone shape deformities associated with OBPP are not limited to the axial plane but are 3D phenomena. Incorporating information related to these multi-planar, 3D humeral deformities into surgical planning could potentially improve functional outcomes after surgery. The documented reduction in retroversion is an osseous adaptation, which may help maintain glenohumeral congruency by partially compensating for the internal rotation of the arm. The humeral head declination is a novel finding and may be an important factor to consider when one is developing OBPP management strategies because it has been shown to lead to significant supraspinatus inefficiencies and increased required elevation forces.

Geometry of the proximal humeral articular surface in young children: a study to define normal and analyze the dysplasia due to brachial plexus birth palsy

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the morphology of the proximal humerus in growing children. This study reports bilateral magnetic resonance imaging measurements in children with internal rotation contractures from birth palsy, hypothesizing that dysplasia alters normal humeral sphericity and symmetry.

METHODS

We studied 25 children with unilateral internal rotation contractures (mean age, 3.7 years) for humeral shape by bilateral magnetic resonance imaging studies at the mid-glenoid level. Local radii of curvature were compared for symmetry and orientation.

RESULTS

Neither side showed uniform radii (sphericity), but normal humeri showed symmetry lost in dysplasia. Internal rotation contractures were correlated with flattening of the anterior humeral head (P = .0002). All heads were flatter in the region of articular contact. The skew axis (the largest cross-sectional diameter of the proximal humerus) was collinear with the articular surface centerline in normal humeri, an alignment often lost with dysplasia, resulting in a skew axis angle. The severity of glenoid deformity correlated with progressive posterior displacement of the humeral head center (P < .0003).

CONCLUSION

The normal humeral articular surface in the young child is not spherical and is flatter in the middle than at the periphery but is symmetric about its central axis. Internal rotation contractures result in loss of this symmetry with characteristic flattening of the anterior humeral head and development of a skew axis angle.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Posterior displacement of the humeral head center of rotation beyond 50% of the calculated head radius warrants vigilance and possibly surgical intervention because there is a high likelihood for development of a pseudoglenoid.

Activities of daily living with reverse prostheses: importance of scapular compensation for functional mobility of the shoulder

HYPOTHESIS

The nonanatomical design of reverse shoulder prostheses induce medial displacement of the center of rotation, impingements and may reduce the mobility of the shoulder. The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that during activities of daily living functional mobility of the shoulder can be restored by scapular compensation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A numerical 3-dimensional model was developed to reproduce the movement of the scapula and humerus, during 4 activities of daily living measured experimentally. This hypothesis was tested in 4 configurations of the aequalis reverse prosthesis (standard 36-mm glenosphere, 42-mm glenosphere, lateralized 36-mm glenosphere, lateralized Bony Increased-Offset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty [BIO-RSA]), which were implanted in the virtual model. All impingement positions were evaluated, as the required scapular compensation to avoid impingements.

RESULTS

With the 36-mm glenosphere, impingements occurred only for rest of hand to back-pocket positions. The 42-mm partly improved the mobility. The 2 lateralized glenospheres were free of impingement. When impingements occurred, the scapular compensation was less than 10°.

CONCLUSION

Most reverse prostheses impingements reported in clinical and biomechanical studies can be avoided, either by scapular compensation or by a glenosphere lateralization. After reverse shoulder arthroplasty, a fraction of the mobility of the gleno-humeral is transferred to the scapulo-thoracic joint.