The Influence of Component Design and Positioning on Soft-Tissue Tensioning and Complications in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Review

» Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was designed to function in the rotator cuff deficient shoulder by adjusting the glenohumeral center of rotation (COR) to maximize deltoid function.» Adjustments in the COR ultimately lead to changes in resting tension of the deltoid and remaining rotator cuff, which can affect implant stability and risk of stress fracture.» Soft-tissue balance and complication profiles can be affected by humeral component (version, neck shaft angle, and inlay vs. onlay) and glenoid component (sagittal placement, version, inclination, and lateralization) design and application.» A good understanding of the effects on soft-tissue balance and complication profile is critical for surgeons to best provide optimal patient outcomes.

Ipsilateral ACL injured patients with Segond fractures demonstrate increased posterior tibial slope

BACKGROUND

The anterolateral complex has been demonstrated to assist with rotational stability and prevention of anterior tibial translation during the pivot shift. In this study the Segond fracture is used as a surrogate for an anterolateral complex injury to determine if there is an association between Segond fracture and increased posterior tibial slope.

METHODS

Patients' charts and radiographs were analyzed retrospectively for the presence of Segond fractures on injury radiographs. These patients, the Segond cohort, were then age and gender matched to a control cohort. Demographic as well MRI measurements of medial and lateral posterior tibial slope and lateral-to-medial slope asymmetry were collected for each cohort. Secondary outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure data was also collected.

RESULTS

The Segond group demonstrated a statistically significantly greater lateral posterior tibial slope (8.42° versus 6.55°, P = 0.003) as well as medial posterior tibial slope (6.57° versus 5.34° degrees, P = 0.045). There was no significant differences between lateral-to-medial asymmetry (2.18°versus 1.83°, P = 0.246).

CONCLUSION

Patients with Segond fractures at the time of anterior cruciate ligament injury have increased medial and lateral posterior tibial slope. This may relate to increased rotational and translational instability associated with anterolateral complex injuries. Surgeons treating these patient may use this information to counsel their patients on the risks of associated pathology at the time of arthroscopy such as lateral meniscal posterior root tears.

Predictors of Occult Chondral Injury Sustained After a Primary Patellar Dislocation

Background and objective

Primary patellar dislocations can concomitantly involve osteochondral injuries for which prompt recognition is paramount for joint preservation. These injuries can be missed on radiographs, necessitating MRI examinations. In this study, we aimed to identify patient parameters that correlate with occult osteochondral injuries.

Methods

Patients were retrospectively identified between 2015 and 2020 through a chart review. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients diagnosed with a primary patellar dislocation with three radiographic views and an MRI of the injured knee. Demographic and radiographic data were evaluated.

Results

A total of 61 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant demographic differences between patients with osteochondral injuries and those without (p>0.05). Seven knees (88%) with an osteochondral lesion and 20 (38%) without had an effusion (p=0.02). There was no association in terms of ligamentous laxity (p=0.49), Caton-Deschamps index (CDI) (p=0.68), sulcus angle (SA) (p=0.68), congruence angle (CA) (p=0.56), and lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA) (p=0.25) between patients with and without an occult osteochondral injury.

Conclusion

Among the parameter examined, the presence of an effusion was the only one that correlated with the presence of occult osteochondral injury in our cohort.

ACL Study Group presents the global trends in ACL reconstruction: biennial survey of the ACL Study Group

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this survey was to gauge the current global trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) as reported by the members of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Study Group (SG).

METHODS

A survey was created and distributed among the members of the ACL SG consisting of 87 questions and 16 categories related to ACLR, including member demographics, preoperative management, primary ACLR techniques and graft choice, use of concomitant procedures and biological augmentation, postoperative rehabilitation, and more.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by the 140 members of the ACL SG. Fifty per cent of members are from Europe, 29% from the USA, 15% from the Asia-Pacific and the remaining 6% are from Latin America, the Middle East, New Zealand and Africa. Most (92%) do not believe there is a role for non-operative management of ACL tears in higher level athletes; conversely, most agree there is a role for non-operative management in lower impact athletes (92%). A single-bundle (90%) technique with hamstring autograft (53%) were most common for primary ACLR. Tunnel position varied among respondents. Sixty-one per cent do not use allograft for primary ACLR. Fifty per cent of respondents use cortical suspensory fixation on the femur, with variable responses on the tibia. Most (79%) do not use biologics in primary ACLR, while 83% think there is a selective role for extra-articular augmentation in primary ACLR. Fifty per cent prefer bone-tendon-bone autograft for revision ACLR and extra-articular augmentation is more commonly used (13% always, 26% often) than in primary ACLR (0% always, 15% often). A majority (53%) use a brace after primary ACLR. The most common responses for minimal time to return to play after primary ACLR were 6-8 months (44%) and 8-12 months (41%).

CONCLUSION

We presented the thoughts and preferences of the ACL SG on the management of ACL injuries. This survey will help to facilitate an ongoing discussion with regard to ACLR by providing global insights into the current surgical trends in ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, Expert Opinion.