Differences in glenohumeral joint morphology between patients with anterior shoulder instability and healthy, uninjured volunteers

A novel 3D MRI-based approach for assessing supraspinatus muscle length

Rotator cuff (RC) tears are a common source of pain and decreased shoulder strength. Muscle length is known to affect muscle strength, and therefore evaluating changes in supraspinatus muscle length associated with RC pathology, surgical repair, and post-operative recovery may provide insights into functional deficits. Our objective was to develop a reliable MRI-based approach for assessing supraspinatus muscle length. Using a new semi-automated approach for identifying 3D location of the muscle-tendon junction (MTJ), supraspinatus muscle length was calculated as the sum of MTJ distance (distance between 3D MTJ position and glenoid plane) and supraspinatus fossa length (distance between root of the scapular spine and glenoid plane). Inter- and intra-operator reliability of this technique were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and found to be excellent (ICCs > 0.96). Muscle lengths of 6 patients were determined before RC repair surgery and at 3- and 12-months post-surgery. Changes in normalized muscle length (muscle length as a percentage of pre-surgical muscle length) at 3 months post-surgery varied considerably across patients (16.1 % increase to 7.0 % decrease) but decreased in all patients from 3- to 12-months post-surgery (0.3 % to 17.2 %). This study developed a novel and reliable approach for quantifying supraspinatus muscle length and provided preliminary demonstration of its utility by assessing muscle length changes associated with RC pathology and surgical repair. Future studies can use this technique to evaluate changes over time in supraspinatus muscle length in response to clinical intervention, and associations between muscle length and shoulder function.

Minimal but potentially clinically relevant anteroinferior position of the humeral head following traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations: A 3D-CT analysis

In unstable shoulders, excessive anteroinferior position of the humeral head relative to the glenoid can lead to a dislocation. Measuring humeral head position could therefore be valuable in quantifying shoulder laxity. The aim of this study was to measure (1) position of the humeral head relative to the glenoid and (2) joint space thickness during passive motion in unstable shoulders caused by traumatic anterior dislocations and in contralateral uninjured shoulders. A prospective cross-sectional CT-study was performed in patients with unilateral anterior shoulder instability. Patients underwent CT scanning of both injured and uninjured side in supine position (0° abduction and 0° external rotation) and in 60°, 90°, and 120° of abduction with 90° of external rotation without an external load. Subsequently, 3D virtual models were created of the humerus and the scapula to create a glenoid coordinate system to identify poster-anterior, inferior-superior, and lateral-medial position of the humeral head relative to the glenoid. Joint space thickness was defined as the average distance between the subchondral bone surfaces of the humeral head and glenoid. Fifteen consecutive patients were included. In supine position, the humeral head was positioned more anteriorly (p = 0.004), inferiorly (p = 0.019), and laterally (p = 0.021) in the injured compared to the uninjured shoulder. No differences were observed in any of the other positions. A joint-space thickness map, showing the bone-to-bone distances, identified the Hill-Sachs lesion footprint on the glenoid surface in external rotation and abduction, but no differences on average joint space thickness were observed in any position.

Reconstruction of recurrent shoulder dislocation with glenoid bone defect with 3D-printed titanium alloy pad: outcomes at 2-year minimum follow-up

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the outcome of shoulder arthroscopy-assisted implantation of three-dimensional (3D)-printed titanium pads for recurrent shoulder dislocation with glenoid bone defects.

METHODS

From June 2019 to May 2020, the clinical efficacy of 3D printed titanium pad implantation assisted by shoulder arthroscopy, for the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocations with shoulder glenoid defects was retrospectively analyzed. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder, Rowe, and Constant scores were recorded before surgery and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. 3D computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging were used to evaluate the location of the glenoid pad, bone ingrowth, joint degeneration, and osteochondral damage.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 12 patients was 21.4 (19-24) years and the mean follow-up time was 27.6 (24-35) months. The Visual Analog Scale score significantly improved from 5.67 ± 1.98 preoperatively to 0.83 ± 0.58 postoperatively (p = 0.012). The postoperative ASES score was significantly increased to 87.91 ± 3.47 compared with preoperative ASES score (46.79 ± 6.45) (p < 0.01). Rowe and Constant scores also improved from 22.5 ± 12.34 and 56.58 ± 7.59 preoperatively to 90.83 ± 4.69 and 90.17 ± 1.89 at 2 years postoperatively, respectively. CT performed 2 years after surgery showed that the pad perfectly replenished the bone-defective part of the shoulder glenoid and restored the articular surface curvature of the shoulder glenoid in the anterior-posterior direction, and the bone around the central riser of the pad was tightly united. Magnetic resonance imaging 2 years after surgery showed that the humeral head osteochondral bone was intact, and there was no obvious osteochondral damage.

CONCLUSIONS

3D printed titanium pads are a reliable, safe, and effective surgical procedure for treating recurrent shoulder dislocations with glenoid bone defects.

Surgical Intervention Following a First Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Is Worthy of Consideration

Up to 60% of patients experience recurrence after a first traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (FTASD), which is often defined as having experienced either dislocation or subluxation. Thus surgical intervention after FTASD is worthy of consideration and is guided by the number of patients who need to receive surgical intervention to prevent 1 redislocation (i.e., number needed to treat), (subjective) health benefit, complication risk, and costs. Operative intervention through arthroscopic stabilization can be successful in reducing recurrence risk in FTASD, as has been shown in multiple randomized controlled trials. Nevertheless, there is a large "gray area" for the indication of arthroscopic stabilization, and it is therefore heavily debated which patients should receive operative treatment. Previous trials showed widely varying redislocation rates in both the intervention and control group, meta-analysis shows 2% to 19% after operative and 20% to 75% after nonoperative treatment, and redislocation rates may not correlate with patient-reported outcomes. The literature is quite heterogeneous, and a major confounder is time to follow-up. Furthermore, there is insufficient standardization of reporting of outcomes and no consensus on definition of risk factors. As a result, surgery is a reasonable intervention for FTASD patients, but in which patients it best prevents redislocation requires additional refinement.

Comparison of Glenohumeral Bone Morphology Between Patients With Versus Without Anterior Shoulder Instability

Background

The stability of the glenohumeral joint is associated with anatomic characteristics including bony structures and soft tissues.

Purpose

To compare the differences in specific bony glenohumeral geometries between shoulders with anterior shoulder instability (ASI), unaffected contralateral shoulders, and healthy control shoulders.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Shoulder computed tomography (CT) scans of 36 patients with ASI and 36 matched healthy controls were retrieved and 3-dimensionally reconstructed. We measured the glenoid radius of curvature (GROC) in the anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior directions, humeral head radius of curvature (HROC) in the AP direction, conformity index, glenoid height, glenoid width, glenoid index, stability angle, glenoid version, and glenoid depth. The differences between the groups were statistically calculated. CT scans of the unaffected contralateral shoulders from 21 of the ASI patients were also collected to identify the consistency of the bony structures in bilateral shoulders.

Results

Patients with ASI had greater GROC in the AP direction (P < .001), HROC in the AP direction (P = .002), glenoid height (P = .005), and glenoid index (P < .001) and smaller conformity index (P < .001), glenoid width (P = .002), stability angle (P < .001), and glenoid depth (P < .001). In addition, the glenoid of the ASI patients was more anteverted compared with that of controls (P = .001). There was no statistical difference in half the measurements between the bilateral shoulder joints in patients with ASI.

Conclusion

In this study, glenohumeral geometric differences were found between ASI patients and healthy control participants. Glenoid curvature and conformity index, based on bilateral comparisons of affected and contralateral shoulders, appear inherent and may predict ASI risk.

Posterior Shoulder Instability but Not Anterior Shoulder Instability Is Related to Glenoid Version

Purpose

To assess and compare glenoid version in patients with anterior shoulder instability (ASI), posterior shoulder instability (PSI), and a control group.

Methods

The operative notes of all patients that had undergone arthroscopic shoulder instability repair between January 2017 and May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were then analyzed, and glenoid version was measured by a single blinded observer. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were 100 patients included in the ASI group, 65 in PSI group, and 100 in the control group. The mean glenoid versions for the ASI group were -16°, -9.1°, and -9.2° for the vault version, simplified vault version, and chondrolabral version, respectively. The mean glenoid versions for the PSI group were -21°, -13.4°, and -16.6° for the vault version, simplified vault version, and chondrolabral version, respectively. The mean versions for the control group were -17.8°, -9.5°, and -9.8° for the vault version, simplified vault version and chondrolabral version, respectively. ANOVA testing and post hoc comparisons revealed the PSI group to be significantly more retroverted than both other groups P < .001. The ASI group's degree of glenoid version was not significantly different to that of the control P = .009.

Conclusion

Patients with PSI have a higher degree of retroversion in comparison to those with ASI and control. There is no significant difference in glenoid version among patients with ASI when compared with control.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Effect of Glenohumeral Joint Bone Morphology on Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Case-Control Study

PURPOSE

Glenohumeral joint compatibility and bone morphology are among the most critical factors in shoulder stabilization. Our study investigated the effect of the bone morphological structure of the shoulder joint on anterior shoulder dislocation.

METHODS

In our study, people with a history of shoulder dislocation were selected as the patient group. In the control group, patients with shoulder MRIs for any reason and no history of shoulder dislocation were included. Those who have a fracture around the shoulder, a congenital deformity in the shoulder region, arthrosis of the shoulder, those whose MRI images cannot be measured, those with Hill-Sachs lesion, connective tissue diseases (such as Ehler Danlos), who are unsure of their diagnosis, or who have incomplete and incorrect suspicious information in their patient file have been excluded. In our retrospective case-control study, glenoid width, glenoid height, glenoid's height-to-width ratio, glenoid's depth, glenoid's version, glenoid's inclination, humerus radius of curvature, glenoid radius of curvature, and bony shoulder stability ratio were measured on MRI images of the patients. The sample size for each group was determined using a power analysis method. The intra-class coefficient (ICC) assessed interobserver and intraobserver reliability.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients, 40 each in the control and patient groups, were included in the study. Glenoid width was measured as 24.27 ± 1.58 in the patient group, 25.61 ± 1.72 in the control group; glenoid height was as measured 36.49 ± 2.26 in the patient group, 36.74 ± 1.99 in the control group; height-to-width ratio was measured as 1.5 ± 0.08 in the patient group, 1.43 ± 0.05 in the control group; glenoid version was as measured -0.53 ± 1.17 in the patient group, -1.44 ± 1.1 in the control group; glenoid inclination was measured as 1.44 ± 3.93 patient group, 2.64 ± 3.81 in the control group; glenoid depth was measured as 1.69 ± 0.41 in the patient group, 2.12 ± 0.53 in the control group; humerus radius of curvature was measured as 29.70 ± 6.76 in the patient group, 24.98 ± 3.22 in the control group; glenoid axial radius of curvature was measured as 61.8 ± 13.52 in the patient group, 52.53 ± 15.69 in the control group; glenoid coronal radius of curvature was measured as 43.01 ± 7.47 in the patient group, 37.74 ± 6.89 in the control group; the bony shoulder stability ratio was measured as 0.35 ± 0.06 in the patient group and 0.44 ± 0.06 in the control group. In the statistical evaluation, the glenoid width (p < 0.001), the glenoid height/width ratio (p < 0.001), the glenoid version (p < 0.001), the depth of the glenoid cavity (p < 0.001), and the radius of curvature measurements of the humeral head (p < 0.001) and the glenoid (axial, p < 0.007; coronal, p < 0.001) were found to be significantly different. Glenoid height and inclination were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of bone morphological features that constitute risk factors for shoulder dislocations plays an important role in preventing shoulder dislocations. In this way, it provides essential data on personalized rehabilitation programs and treatment selection for recurrent dislocations.

In vivo evaluation of rotator cuff internal impingement during scapular plane abduction in asymptomatic individuals

Internal impingement-or entrapment of the undersurface of the rotator cuff tendon against the glenoid during overhead activities-is believed to contribute to articular-sided tears. However, little is known about internal impingement outside athletic populations. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (1) describe glenoid-to-footprint distances and proximity centers during dynamic, in vivo motion in asymptomatic individuals, and (2) determine the extent to which these measures differed between individuals with and without a rotator cuff tear. Shoulder kinematics were assessed in 37 asymptomatic individuals during scapular plane abduction using a high-speed biplane radiographic system. Glenoid-to-footprint distances and proximity center locations were calculated by combining the kinematics with computerized tomography-derived bone models. Glenoid-to-footprint contact was presumed to occur when the minimum distance was less than the estimated labral thickness. The condition of the supraspinatus tendon (intact, torn) was assessed using ultrasound. Minimum distances and proximity centers were compared over humerothoracic elevation angles (90°, 110°, 130°, 150°) and between supraspinatus pathology groups using two-factor mixed model analysis of variances. Glenoid-to-footprint minimum distances decreased consistently across elevation angles (p < 0.01) without a significant difference between groups. Contact was estimated to occur in all participants. Proximity centers were generally located on the anterior half of the rotator cuff footprint and on the posterosuperior glenoid. Statement of Clinical Significance: Internal impingement during overhead motions may be a prevalent mechanism of rotator cuff pathology as contact appears to be common and involves the region of the rotator cuff footprint where degenerative rotator cuff tears are thought to originate.

Rehabilitation after Shoulder Instability Surgery

Shoulder instability can occur in any direction and presents across a broad spectrum including traumatic dislocations, repetitive microinstability events or subluxations, and global joint laxity. The development of pain, functional decline, and articular pathologic condition is a multifaceted process that is influenced by the underlying bony morphology, biology of the surrounding soft tissue structures, dynamic coordination of the periscapular musculature, and patient factors such as age, activity level, and associated injuries. This article will focus on the younger, active patient with instability due to deficiencies in the capsulolabral complex and dynamic stabilizers.

Correspondence between scapular anatomical coordinate systems and the 3D axis of motion: A new perspective on an old challenge

Several scapular anatomical coordinate systems have been reported in the literature to describe shoulder kinematics. Unfortunately, the use of different conventions hinders comparison across studies. Further, inconsistencies between a coordinate system and the scapula's 3D axis of motion means that scapular motion will be incorrectly attributed to axes about which it did not rotate. The objectives of this study were to: 1) determine the extent to which the axes of four common scapular coordinate system conventions correspond to the 3D axis of scapular motion (i.e., instantaneous helical axis, IHA), and 2) report the prevalence of scapulothoracic gimbal lock for each convention. Shoulder kinematics were tracked during scapular plane abduction in 45 participants using biplane videoradiography. Scapulothoracic kinematics were described using the original convention proposed by van der Helm, the convention recommended by the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB), a glenoid-based coordinate system, and a glenoid-oriented coordinate system. The 3D angle was calculated between the IHA and each axis of the four conventions (IHA-axis angular deviations). A repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare IHA-axis angular deviations between conventions. The glenoid-oriented and ISB conventions resulted in the smallest and largest IHA-axis angular deviations, respectively (21.7°±3.6° vs. 30.5°±5.2°, p < 0.01). Gimbal lock was approached in 17.8% of participants when using the original convention, 2.2% when using the ISB convention, and 0% when using the glenoid-based or -oriented conventions. These findings suggest the glenoid-oriented coordinate system may be worthy of further consideration when investigating shoulder kinematics during scapular plane abduction.

Glenoid bony morphology along long diameter is associated with the occurrence of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation: a case-control study based on three-dimensional CT measurements

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study is to compare the anatomic parameters of proximal humerus, glenoid, and glenohumeral joint between patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation (RASD) and patients without RASD with the assistance of three-dimensional (3D) CT scans.

METHODS

Sixty patients were included in the study and divided into group RASD and group control. 3D-CT models of shoulder joint for each included patient were reconstructed and multiple anatomic parameters were measured.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in morphological parameters of humerus and glenohumeral joints. Long diameter of glenoid was 3.50 ± 0.34 cm for patients in group RASD and 3.31 ± 0.32 cm in group control (p = 0.039). There was a statistically significant difference in the ratio of long to short diameter of glenoid (p < 0.001). Ratio of humeral head height to glenoid long diameter (Hhh/Gld) was 1.02 ± 0.07 in group RASD, significantly lower than 1.09 ± 0.08 in group control (p = 0.001). Longitudinal depth of glenoid was significantly higher in group RASD (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The glenoid morphology along long diameter is closely correlated with the stability of glenohumeral joint, including glenoid long diameter and glenoid longitudinal depth. It is especially noteworthy that the value of Hhh/Gld decreases in patients with RASD. The difference of Hhh/Gld between the two groups reminds us that the correlation of bony structure along long diameter between glenoid and humeral head plays an important role in RASD.

Does native glenoid anatomy predispose to shoulder instability? An MRI analysis

BACKGROUND

It is unclear if native glenohumeral anatomic features predispose young patients to instability and if such anatomic risk factors differ between males and females. The purpose of this study was to compare glenoid and humeral head dimensions between patients with a documented instability event without bone loss to matched controls and to evaluate for sex-based differences across measurements. The authors hypothesized that a smaller glenoid width and glenoid surface area would be significant risk factors for instability, whereas humeral head width would not.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was queried for patients aged <21 years who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for shoulder instability. Patients with prior shoulder surgery, bony Bankart, or glenoid or humeral bone loss were excluded. Patients were matched by sex and age to control patients who had no history of shoulder instability. Two blinded independent raters measured glenoid height, glenoid width, and humeral head width on sagittal MRI. Glenoid surface area, glenoid index (ratio of glenoid height to width), and glenohumeral mismatch ratio (ratio of humeral head width to glenoid width) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 107 instability patients and 107 controls were included (150 males and 64 females). Among the entire cohort, there were no differences in glenoid height, glenoid width, glenoid surface area, humeral head width, or glenoid index between patients with instability and controls. Overall, those with instability had a greater glenohumeral mismatch ratio (P = .029) compared with controls. When stratified by sex, female controls and instability patients showed no differences in any of the glenoid or humerus dimensions. However, males with instability had a smaller glenoid width by 3.5% (P = .017), smaller glenoid surface area by 5.2% (P = .015), and a greater glenohumeral mismatch ratio (P = .027) compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

Compared with controls, males with instability were found to have smaller glenoid width and surface area, and a glenoid width that was proportionally smaller relative to humeral width. In contrast, bony glenohumeral morphology did not appear to be a significant risk factor for instability among females. These sex-based differences suggest that anatomic factors may influence risk of instability for male and female patients differently.

Donor-Specific Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibody Formation After Allograft Glenoid Reconstruction Occurs But Does Not Impact Clinicoradiographic Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Recurrent shoulder instability is a prevalent condition, with glenoid bone loss as a common cause. Arthroscopic repair using distal tibial allografts provides long-lasting treatment by restoring glenoid surface area and presumably avoids risks of sensitization against donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA). Two case studies have challenged this assumption, suggesting that small bone allografts are able to induce host adaptive immune responses to donor HLA. The incidence of small bone allograft HLA sensitization and its effects on resorption and patient outcomes are unclear.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to assess the rate of sensitization against donor HLA after distal tibial allograft procedures for shoulder instability due to glenoid bone loss and to find whether HLA sensitization negatively affects patient-reported and radiographic outcomes. We hypothesized that sensitized patients would have worse radiographic and self-reported outcomes compared with nonsensitized patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 71 patients with a mean age of 28.85 years (range, 13.58-61.31 years) were enrolled, with 58 patients submitting sufficient pre- and postoperative blood samples for HLA antibody testing. In patients who developed HLA antibodies postoperatively, donor HLA typing was used to confirm donor-specific sensitization. Pre- and postoperative computerized tomography scans (0.9 ± 0.8 years follow-up) were used to grade resorption based on the modified Zhu resorption grade classification (ie, grade 0 = no resorption; grade 1 = less than 25% resorption; grade 2 = between 25% and 50% resorption; and grade 3 = larger than 50% resorption). The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index outcome scores were obtained preoperatively and at regular postoperative appointments. Resorption and outcome data were compared between sensitized and nonsensitized patients using the Fisher exact test, independent 2-tailed Student t tests, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to determine the effect of HLA sensitization on radiographic and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 7 (12.1%) patients with sufficient HLA samples were sensitized against donor HLA postoperatively. Sensitized patients did not have significantly higher rates of resorption (21.9% vs 14.3%, 21.9% vs 28.6%, 43.8% vs 28.6%, and 12.5% vs 28.6% for respective resorption grades 0-3; P = .67; α = .05). Self-reported outcomes were not statistically significant between sensitized and nonsensitized patients (24.9 ± 27.61 vs 40.16 ± 18.99; P = .37; α = .05) and did not differ significantly based on resorption grade (47.4 ± 0.0 vs 55.2 ± 18.8, 30.4 ± 15.8 vs 39.9 ± 20.9, 41.2 ± 0.0 vs 39.1 ± 13.1, and -24.9 ± 0 vs 24.4 ± 19.6 for resorption grades 0-3; P > .05; α = .05).

CONCLUSION

Sensitization against donor HLA after small bone graft allografting was not previously considered but has been brought to light as a possibility. Aside from potential complications for future organ transplants, HLA sensitization does not introduce a risk for adverse outcomes or higher grades of resorption compared with nonsensitized patients after small bone allografting for shoulder instability.

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

The shoulder is one of the human body's most complex joint systems, with motion occurring through the coordinated actions of four individual joints, multiple ligaments, and approximately 20 muscles. Unfortunately, shoulder pathologies (e.g., rotator cuff tears, joint dislocations, arthritis) are common, resulting in substantial pain, disability, and decreased quality of life. The specific etiology for many of these pathologic conditions is not fully understood, but it is generally accepted that shoulder pathology is often associated with altered joint motion. Unfortunately, measuring shoulder motion with the necessary level of accuracy to investigate motion-based hypotheses is not trivial. However, radiographic-based motion measurement techniques have provided the advancement necessary to investigate motion-based hypotheses and provide a mechanistic understanding of shoulder function. Thus, the purpose of this article is to describe the approaches for measuring shoulder motion using a custom biplanar videoradiography system. The specific objectives of this article are to describe the protocols to acquire biplanar videoradiographic images of the shoulder complex, acquire CT scans, develop 3D bone models, locate anatomical landmarks, track the position and orientation of the humerus, scapula, and torso from the biplanar radiographic images, and calculate the kinematic outcome measures. In addition, the article will describe special considerations unique to the shoulder when measuring joint kinematics using this approach.

Glenoid Radius of Curvature and Humeral Head Volume Are Associated With Postoperative Dislocation After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Purpose

To measure bony morphologic parameters and identify their association with arthroscopic Bankart repair failure.

Methods

This was a retrospective comparative study. The inclusion criteria were primary arthroscopic Bankart repair, no prior shoulder surgery, traumatic cause, and had a Bankart (soft tissue and bony) lesion evident on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The exclusion criteria were posterior labral pathology, multidirectional instability, connective tissue disorder, rotator cuff pathology, and those who underwent concomitant shoulder procedures. Patients who had a postoperative redislocation (unstable group) were compared with matched patients who did not (stable group). Data were obtained by chart review and from preoperative MRI. Comparisons were made using the Student t test, Fisher exact test, or χ² test. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. Inter-rater reliability was measured between reviewers.

Results

A total of 45 patients experienced a postoperative dislocation and were matched to 90 patients without a postoperative dislocation. There were no differences in demographic and radiographic variables. The radius of curvature (ROC) of the glenoid was larger (shallower) in the unstable group (23.6 mm vs 22.6 mm, P = .05). The humeral head volume (HHV) trended higher in the unstable group (68.9 mL vs 62.9 mL, P = .06). The glenoid volume was not significantly different. A greater percentage of patients with a glenoid ROC of 24.5 mm or greater (62.1% vs 26.4%, P = .0003) and an HHV of 80 mm³ or greater (60.8% vs 28.9%, P = .003) experienced a redislocation compared with patients without these factors. Patients with a glenoid ROC of 24.5 mm or more and an HHV of 80 mm³ or more had greater than 4 times the odds of redislocation (odds ratio, 4.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-14.43; P = .0098). Strong inter-rater reliability was found for the HHV, glenoid volume, glenoid ROC, and humeral head ROC measurements (r = 0.94, r = 0.88, r = 0.89, and r = 0.95, respectively).

Conclusions

This study shows that large ROC (shallow) glenoids in conjunction with large humeral heads may predispose patients to failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative trial.

Thinking outside the glenohumeral box: Hierarchical shape variation of the periarticular anatomy of the scapula using statistical shape modeling

Variation in the shape of the glenoid and periarticular anatomy of the scapula has been associated with shoulder pathology. The goal of this study was to identify the modes of shape variation of periarticular scapular anatomy in relation to the glenoid in nonpathologic shoulders. Computed tomography scans of 31 cadaveric scapulae, verified to be free of pathology, were three-dimensionally reconstructed. Statistical shape modeling and principal component analysis identified the modes of shape variation across the population. Corresponding linear and angular measurements quantified the morphometric variance identified by the modes. Linear measures were normalized to the radius of the inferior glenoid to account for differences in the scaling of the bones. Five modes captured 89.7% of total shape variation of the glenoid and periarticular anatomy. Apart from size differences (mode 1: 33.0%), acromial anatomy accounted for the largest variation (mode 2: 32.0%). Further modes described variation in glenoid inclination (mode 3: 11.8%), coracoid orientation and size (mode 4: 9.0%), and variation in coracoacromial (CA) morphology (mode 5: 3.1%). The average scapula had a mean acromial tilt of 49 ± 7°, scapular spine angle of 61 ± 6°, the glenoid inclination of 84 ± 4°, coracoid deviation angle of 26 ± 4°, coracoid length of 3.7 ± 0.3 glenoid radii, and a CA base length of 5.6 ± 0.5 radii. In this study, the identified shape modes explain almost all of the variance in scapular anatomy. The acromion exhibited the highest variance of all periarticular anatomic structures of the scapula in relation to the glenoid, which may play a role in many shoulder pathologies.

Influence of coracoid anatomy on the location of glenoid rim defects in anterior shoulder instability: 3D CT-scan evaluation of 51 patients

PURPOSE

Glenoid bony lesions play a role in approximately half of anterior shoulder instability cases. The purpose of this study is to see if the anatomy of the coracoid affects the location of glenoid rim defects. We hypothesized that a prominent coracoid (lower and lateral) would be more likely to cause an anterior-inferior glenoid lesion, and a less prominent coracoid more prone to cause an anterior lesion. The null hypothesis being the absence of correlation.

METHODS

Fifty-one shoulder CT-scans from a prospective database, with 3D reconstruction, were analyzed. The position of glenoid lesions was identified using the validated clock method, identifying the beginning and end time. The size of bony glenoid defects was calculated using the validated glenoid ratio method. The position of the coracoid tip was measured in three orthogonal planes.

RESULTS

Analysis included 25 right shoulders and 26 left shoulders in seven females and 41 males. The vertical position of the coracoid tip relative to the top of the glenoid was highly correlated to the location of the glenoid defect on the profile view (r = -0.625; 95% CI 0.423-0.768; p = 0.001). Thus, higher coracoids were associated with anterior lesions, while lower coracoids were associated with anterior-inferior lesions. A more laterally prominent coracoid was also correlated with anterior-inferior lesions (r = 0.433; 95% CI 0.179-0.633; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that coracoid anatomy affects the location of bony Bankart defects in anterior shoulder instability. Lower and laterally prominent coracoids are associated with anterior-inferior lesions. This variation in anatomy should be considered during pre-op planning for surgeries involving bone graft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4 basic science.

Does the innate relative size of the humeral head and glenoid affect the risk of anterior shoulder instability?

BACKGROUND

Bony lesions after shoulder dislocation reduce the joint contact area and increase the risk of recurrent instability. It is unknown whether the innate relative sizes of the humeral head and glenoid may predispose patients to shoulder instability. This study evaluated whether anterior shoulder instability is associated with a larger innate humeral head/glenoid ratio (IHGR).

METHODS

We evaluated CT scans of 40 shoulders with anterior shoulder instability and 48 controls. We measured axial humeral head diameter and glenoid diameter following native contours, discarding any bony lesions, and calculated IHGR by dividing both diameters. Multivariate logistic regression determined whether the IHGR, corrected for age and gender as potential confounders, was associated with anterior shoulder instability.

RESULTS

Mean IHGR was 1.48 ± 0.23 in the group with anterior shoulder instability and 1.42 ± 0.20 in the group without anterior shoulder instability. Measurements for axial humeral head and axial glenoid diameters demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC range: 0.94-0.95). IHGR was not significantly associated with anterior shoulder instability (OR = 1.105, 95%CI = 0.118-10.339, p = 0.930).

DISCUSSION

The innate ratio of humeral head and glenoid diameters was not significantly associated with anterior shoulder instability in this retrospective sample of 88 shoulder CT scans.

Coracoacromial morphology: a contributor to recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability?

BACKGROUND

Although scapular morphology contributes to glenohumeral osteoarthritis and rotator cuff disease, its role in traumatic glenohumeral instability remains unknown. We hypothesized that coracoacromial and glenoid morphology would differ between healthy subjects and patients with recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans of 31 cadaveric control scapulae and 54 scapulae of patients with recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability and Hill-Sachs lesions were 3-dimensionally reconstructed. Statistical shape modeling identified the modes of variation between the scapulae of both groups. Corresponding measurements quantified these modes in relation to the glenoid center (linear offset measures), defined by the best-fit circle of the inferior glenoid, or the glenoid center plane (angles), which bisects the glenoid longitudinally. Distances were normalized for glenoid size.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, the unstable coracoids were shorter (P = .004), with a more superior and medial offset of the tip (mean difference [MD], 7 and 3 mm, respectively; P < .001) and an origin closer to the 12-o'clock position (MD, 6°; P < .001). The unstable scapular spines originated closer to the 9-o'clock position (MD, 4°; P = .012), and the unstable acromions were more vertically oriented (MD, 6°; P < .001). The unstable glenoids had an increased height-width index (MD, 0.04; P = .021), had a flatter anterior-posterior radius of curvature (MD, 77 mm; P < .001), and were more anteriorly tilted (MD, 5°; P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Coracoacromial and glenoid anatomy differs between individuals with and without recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability. This pathologic anatomy is not addressed by current soft-tissue stabilization procedures and may contribute to instability recurrence.

Risk factors for anterior shoulder instability: a matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

Anatomic skeletal features of the shoulder play important roles in anterior shoulder dislocation. However, studies on the effect of the humeral structure are few. This case-control study aimed to analyze the risk factors of anterior shoulder instability, including glenoid and humeral factors.

METHODS

Anterior shoulder instability was found in 64 of 10,035 individuals who underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Propensity score matching was used to select controls matched for age, sex, height, and weight. We analyzed the glenoid and humeral structural data using conditional logistic regression analysis and identified cutoff points using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between the control and dislocation groups in the depth-to-width ratio (0.119 ± 0.034 vs. 0.105 ± 0.037, P = .021), height-to-width ratio (1.51 ± 0.13 vs. 1.67 ± 0.16, P < .001), humeral head diameter-to-glenoid fossa diameter ratio (1.56 ± 0.11 vs. 1.64 ± 0.20, P < .001), and humeral containing angle (67.3° ± 5.9° vs. 60.4° ± 5.9°, P < .001). The humeral containing angle (odds ratio, 0.95; P = .024) and the glenoid height-to-width ratio (odds ratio, 7.88; P = .002), adjusted for the depth-to-width ratio and diameter ratio, were associated with anterior shoulder instability. The cutoff point for the humeral containing angle was 64° and for the height-to-width ratio was 1.60.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed significant risk factors for shoulder instability in the Chinese Han population. The humeral containing angle and the glenoid height-to-width ratio were risk factors for anterior shoulder instability.

The role of bone in glenohumeral stability

Shoulder stability depends on several factors, either anatomical or functional. Anatomical factors can be further subclassified under soft tissue (shoulder capsule, glenoid rim, glenohumeral ligaments etc) and bony structures (glenoid cavity and humeral head).

Normal glenohumeral stability is maintained through factors mostly pertaining to the scapular side: glenoid version, depth and inclination, along with scapular dynamic positioning, can potentially cause decreased stability depending on the direction of said variables in the different planes. No significant factors in normal humeral anatomy seem to play a tangible role in affecting glenohumeral stability.

When the glenohumeral joint suffers an episode of acute dislocation, either anterior (more frequent) or posterior, bony lesions often develop on both sides: a compression fracture of the humeral head (or Hill–Sachs lesion) and a bone loss of the glenoid rim. Interaction of such lesions can determine ‘re-engagement’ and recurrence.

The concept of ‘glenoid track’ can help quantify an increased risk of recurrence: when the Hill–Sachs lesion engages the anterior glenoid rim, it is defined as ‘off-track’; if it does not, it is an ‘on-track’ lesion. The position of the Hill–Sachs lesion and the percentage of glenoid bone loss are critical factors in determining the likelihood of recurrent instability and in managing treatment.

In terms of posterior glenohumeral instability, the ‘gamma angle concept’ can help ascertain which lesions are prone to recurrence based on the sum of specific angles and millimetres of posterior glenoid bone loss, in a similar fashion to what happens in anterior shoulder instability.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:632-640. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180028

Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study

Background

This study focused on the unique aspect of investigating shoulder morphometric differences between 2 distinct populations.

Methods

We used 90 computed tomography images of cadaveric shoulders for this study; 45 scans belonged to the South African (SA) cohort (49.74 ± 15.4 years) and the rest were Swiss (CH; 53.8 ± 21 years). The articulating surfaces of the glenohumeral joint were extracted, and their morphometric features, such as head circular diameter, glenoid and humeral head radius of curvature, head height, and humeral height, were measured.

Results

The mean interpopulation difference in the circular diameter of the humerus was 2.0 mm (P = .017) and 1.86 mm (P > .05) in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior directions, respectively. The difference in the radius of curvature between the populations was 1.17 mm (P = .037). The SA shoulders were found to be longer than the CH shoulders by 8.4 mm (P > .05). There was no significant difference in the glenoid radius of curvature. The SA shoulders had higher glenohumeral mismatch (P = .005) and lower conformity index (P = .001) in comparison to the CH shoulders.

Conclusion

This study presents anatomic differences between African and European glenohumeral articulating surfaces. The results suggest that the glenohumeral geometry is both gender and population specific, and future joint replacements may be designed to address these differences.

How Satisfied Are Patients with Arthroscopic Bankart Repair? A 2-Year Follow-up on Quality-of-Life Outcome

PURPOSE

To report general life and health satisfaction after arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients with post-traumatic recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability and to investigate postoperative time lost to return to work at 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2013 patients treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair in the beach chair position for acute shoulder instability were included in this study. Questions on Life Satisfaction Modules (FLZ^M) and the Short Form 12 (SF-12) were used as quality-of-life outcome scales. Oxford Instability Score (OIS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), and self-reported American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder index were used as functional outcome scales. Return to work (months) was monitored and analyzed depending on physical workload. Data were assessed the day before surgery and prospectively monitored until 24 months postoperatively. Quality-of-life outcome was correlated with functional shoulder outcome and compared with normative age-adjusted data. Paired t-test, Wilcoxon test, Mann-Whitney U-Test, and Spearman's correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were prospectively included. The mean age at surgery was 29.4 years. Satisfaction with general life and satisfaction with health (FLZ^M) as well as physical component scale (SF-12) improved significantly to values above normative data within 6 to 12 months after surgery (each P < .001). OIS, QuickDASH, and ASES improved significantly from baseline until 24 months after surgery (each P < .001). For ASES, improvement above minimal clinically important difference was shown. There was a positive correlation between quality of life and functional outcome scores (P < .05; rho, 0.3-0.4). Mean time to return to work was 2 months (range, 0-10; standard deviation, 1.9), with significantly longer time intervals observed in patients with heavy physical workload (3.1 months; range, 0 to 10; standard deviation, 2.4; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Following arthroscopic Bankart repair, quality of life was impaired during early course after surgery and increased significantly above preoperative levels within 6 to 12 months after the procedure. A steady state of excellent quality-of-life and functional outcomes was noted after 12 months of follow-up. Quality-of-life outcome scales correlated significantly with the functional outcome. Heavy physical workload must be considered as a risk factor for prolonged time lost to return to work.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prospective noncomparative therapeutic case series.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Scans of the Glenoid Version in Anterior Dislocation of the Shoulder

The glenoid version is an important factor in the etiology of anterior dislocation of the shoulder and the planning of shoulder surgery. Few reports compare the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements of the glenoid version with those of computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to show that it is possible to use MRI instead of CT, which is accepted as the gold standard today for the evaluation of the glenoid version. A total of 55 patients with a history of 1 nonsurgically treated unilateral anterior dislocation of the shoulder who had both MRI and CT records for the dislocated shoulders constituted the study group. The glenoid version was measured in the axial plane on MRI and CT. Mean glenoid version measured by the observers was -1.6°±4.7° (95% confidence interval, -2.3° to -0.8°) and -1.8°±4.3° (95% confidence interval, -2.5° to -1.2°) by CT and MRI, respectively (P=.126). The evaluation of the CT and MRI measurements made by the 3 observers (X, Y, and Z) revealed no significant difference, as the P values of X CT - X MRI, Y CT - Y MRI, and Z CT - Z MRI were .550, .406, and .238, respectively. Interclass correlation among the 3 observers for CT and MRI was 0.996 and 0.981, respectively. The imaging methods of MRI and CT can be interchangeably used in the evaluation of the glenoid version in cases of anterior dislocation of the shoulder. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e687-e692.].

The importance of glenoid version in patients with anterior dislocation of the shoulder

BACKGROUND

Although increased retroversion of the glenoid has been shown to be an important factor in posterior instability of the shoulder, there are few studies reporting glenoid bone structure as a risk factor in anterior dislocation of the shoulder. This study aimed to compare glenoid version in patients with anterior dislocation of the shoulder and individuals in a control group with no shoulder problems before undergoing computed tomography and to assess a possible relationship between demographic characteristics and glenoid version angle.

METHODS

The study group comprised 63 patients (12 women and 51 men; mean age, 35.71 years) with 1 or multiple unilateral anterior dislocations of the shoulder (dislocated group), whereas 63 individuals (11 women and 52 men; mean age, 35.38 years) with no history of shoulder complaints and no signs of instability constituted the control group. The glenoid version angle was measured on an axial cut of the computed tomography scan.

RESULTS

The glenoid version angles on the dislocated side in the study group were significantly more anteverted than those of the dominant (P < .001) and nondominant (P = .023) shoulders of the control group. The version angles of dislocated shoulders significantly differed from those of nondislocated shoulders of both men (P = .041) and women (P = .049). There was no significant relationship between the glenoid version angle on the dislocated side and dislocation mechanism (P = .883), age group (P = .356), or number of dislocations (P = .971).

CONCLUSIONS

Glenoid version is an important factor for the development of anterior dislocation of the shoulder.

Distal tibia allograft for glenohumeral instability: does radius of curvature match?

BACKGROUND

A distal tibia osteochondral allograft is a potential graft option for glenoid reconstruction because the distal tibia may have a similar radius of curvature (ROC) as the glenoid. This study evaluated ROC mismatch as measured on computed tomography (CT) scans between the glenoid, distal tibia, and humeral head.

METHODS

Bilateral CT images were formatted for 10 decedents from the Office of the Medical Investigator database, giving 20 specimens per anatomic location. The ROCs of the glenoid, distal tibia, and humeral head were measured. A statistical model was generated to assess ROC mismatch of randomly paired distal tibias and glenoids.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation ROC was 2.9 ± 0.25 cm for the glenoid, 2.3 ± 0.21 cm for the distal tibia, and 2.5 ± 0.12 cm for the humeral head. No differences were found in laterality, intraobserver, or interobserver measurements. The least-squares difference in the ROC between the glenoid and tibia was 0.57 cm, glenoid and humerus was 0.40 cm, and humerus and tibia was 0.17 cm. Only 22% of randomly paired distal tibias and glenoids had a difference in ROC of 0.3 cm or less.

CONCLUSION

CT measurement of the ROC of the glenoid, distal tibia, and humeral head is reliable and reproducible. The probability of obtaining a random distal tibia allograft with a similar ROC to the glenoid is low. Obtaining ROC measurements of the injured glenoid and the distal tibia allograft specimen before use for glenoid reconstruction may be useful.

Effect of Arthroscopic Stabilization on In Vivo Glenohumeral Joint Motion and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Anterior Instability

BACKGROUND

Glenohumeral joint (GHJ) dislocations are common, and the resulting shoulder instability is often treated with arthroscopic stabilization. These procedures result in favorable clinical outcomes, but abnormal GHJ motion may persist, which may place patients at risk for developing osteoarthritis. However, the effects of shoulder instability and arthroscopic stabilization on GHJ motion are not well understood.

HYPOTHESIS

GHJ motion is significantly influenced by anterior instability and arthroscopic stabilization, but postsurgical measures of GHJ motion are not different from those of control subjects.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

In vivo GHJ motion was measured by applying a computed tomographic model-based tracking technique to biplane radiographic images acquired during an apprehension test in healthy control subjects (n = 11) and anterior instability patients (n = 11). Patients were tested before surgery and at 6 months after surgery. Control subjects were tested once. Shoulder strength, active range of motion (ROM), and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) index were also measured.

RESULTS

Before surgery, the humerus of the instability patients during the apprehension test was located significantly more anteriorly on the glenoid (7.9% of glenoid width; 2.1 mm) compared with that of the controls (P = .03), but arthroscopic stabilization moved this joint contact location posteriorly on the glenoid (4.7% of glenoid width; 1.1 mm; P = .03). After surgery, GHJ excursion during the apprehension test was significantly lower (14.7% of glenoid width; 3.6 mm) compared with presurgical values (19.4% of glenoid width; 4.7 mm; P = .01) and with that of the controls (22.4% of glenoid width; 5.7 mm; P = .01). The external and internal rotation strength of patients was significantly lower than that of the controls before surgery (P < .05), but differences in strength did not persist after surgery (P > .17). External rotation ROM in patients was significantly lower than that in control subjects both before and after arthroscopic stabilization (P < .01). The WOSI score improved significantly, from 48.3 ± 13.1 presurgery to 86.3 ± 16.5 after surgery (P = .0002).

CONCLUSION

In patients with anterior instability, arthroscopic stabilization significantly improves measures of strength, ROM, and clinical outcome. However, GHJ excursion is not fully restored to levels seen in the control subjects.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although arthroscopic stabilization satisfactorily restores most clinical outcome measures, GHJ excursion and external rotation ROM remain compromised compared with healthy control subjects and may contribute to the development of osteoarthritis in patients with anterior instability.

Associations between in-vivo glenohumeral joint motion and morphology

Joint morphology has a significant influence on joint motion and may contribute to the development of rotator cuff pathology, but the relationships between glenohumeral joint (GHJ) morphology and in-vivo GHJ motion are not well understood. The objectives of this study were to assess measures of joint morphology and their relationship with in-vivo joint motion in two populations: shoulders with intact rotator cuffs (n=48) and shoulders with rotator cuff pathology (n=36, including 5 symptomatic tears, 9 asymptomatic tears and 22 repaired tears). GHJ morphology was measured from CT-based three-dimensional models of the humerus and scapula. In-vivo GHJ motion was measured during shoulder abduction using biplane x-ray imaging. Associations between GHJ morphology and motion were assessed with univariate and best subsets regression. The only morphological difference identified between the populations was the critical shoulder angle (intact: 34.5 ± 4.7°, pathologic: 36.9 ± 5.0°, p=0.03), which is consistent with previous research. In intact shoulders, the superior/inferior (S/I) position of the humerus on the glenoid during shoulder abduction was significantly associated with the glenoid's S/I radius of curvature (p<0.01), conformity index (p<0.01), and stability angle (p<0.01). Furthermore, the S/I position of the humerus on the glenoid was negatively associated with the critical shoulder angle (p=0.04), which contradicts previous research. No significant associations between GHJ morphology and GHJ motion were detected in shoulders with rotator cuff tears. It is unknown if rotator cuff pathology compromises the relationships between GHJ morphology and motion, or if the absence of this relationship is a pre-existing condition that increases the likelihood of pathology.