Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute head-splitting, 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly

[Old and young-Differences in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures?]

The rising incidence of proximal humeral fractures has made this an important topic in the treatment reality of trauma surgery. Given the variety of treatment options available, the question arises as to what extent patient age influences the choice of treatment and, consequently, the functional outcome. In our approach the morphological features of the fracture and individual patient characteristics form the foundation for determining whether surgical or conservative treatment should be pursued. Whenever possible, joint-preserving reconstruction should be the goal in younger patients. In older patients, the implantation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty is the treatment of choice. Joint replacement enables early mobilization of older patients, facilitating a swift return to daily life. Looking ahead, a further increase in the fracture incidence and a corresponding rise in the rate of necessary surgical interventions are anticipated.

Prosthetic treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly

The Section for Skeletal Trauma and Sports Injuries of the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) has reached a consensus among European countries in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in a working group. As a result the ESTES recommendations on proximal humerus fractures in the elderly were published in 2021. The various treatment options and algorithms for this are now described in more detail and the procedures were explained in several related specialist articles. The recommendations include conservative and four possible surgical treatment options (ORIF, nailing, hemi- and total inverse arthroplasty). This article deals with hemi- and total inverse arthroplasty. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has emerged as a key treatment for complex proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. It offers significant advantages in restoring function, alleviating pain, and providing durable outcomes compared to alternative approaches. Despite challenges related to implant complications and surgical expertise, ongoing advancements in technology and techniques continue to improve its effectiveness. With the rising incidence of complex fractures, RTSA is expected to play an increasingly vital role in maintaining the quality of life in aging populations.

Trends in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review of Predominant Indications and the Most Commonly Employed Implant Designs

Background: Over the past few decades, shoulder arthroplasty has evolved rapidly, driven by a growing demand for surgical solutions to degenerative, traumatic, and irreparable rotator cuff-related pathologies, particularly in an aging but increasingly active population. Objective: This narrative review aims to examine the main clinical indications and the most commonly used implant designs, highlighting differences in functional outcomes, complication rates, and revision rates between anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Methods: Articles published between 2011 and 2025 were selected through PubMed and the Australian Joint Replacement Registry reports from 2023 and 2024. The included studies comprised randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses involving adult patients treated for primary osteoarthritis, proximal humerus fractures, and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Results: ATSA remains the preferred option in younger patients with an intact rotator cuff, due to superior outcomes in mobility and prosthesis longevity. However, glenoid component loosening remains a significant limitation. Initially reserved for irreparable cuff tears and complex fractures, RTSA has seen a progressive expansion of its indications, offering lower revision rates and satisfactory functional results, particularly in elderly patients. Recent prosthetic innovations include stemless implants, augmented glenoid components, and convertible platforms. Conclusions: The choice between ATSA and RTSA should be individualized, based on patient-specific factors such as age, rotator cuff integrity, functional demands, and bone quality. Advances in implant materials and design, together with improved patient selection, have significantly enhanced clinical outcomes.

Uncemented versus cemented humeral fixation during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture

Introduction

Over time, the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) treating proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) and fracture sequelae has grown significantly due to its demonstrated effectiveness over open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and hemiarthroplasty (HA). Cemented humeral stems have been widely utilized in RTSA for PHF, however cementless alternatives have become increasingly popular. This study seeks to analyze outcomes and complications in patients undergoing RTSA for fracture with uncemented and cemented stems at mid-term follow-up.

Methods

Patient records were queried for all patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture with between January 7, 2009 and January 10, 2019 and completed a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Demographics characteristics, post-operative functional measurements, complications, and radiographs were assessed. A 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.

Results

A total of 23 patients encompassing 11 cemented and 12 uncemented stems met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the uncemented cohort was 70.0 ± 9.8 years with a mean follow-up of 2.6 ± 1.3 years while the mean age of the cemented cohort was 68.9 ± 9.2 years with a mean follow-up of 2.9 ± 1.1 years. No differences in strength, range of motion, or survival between groups were observed. Two patients in the cemented cohort demonstrated humeral component loosening on follow-up radiographs.

Discussion

Uncemented and cemented humeral fixation during RTSA for proximal humerus fracture leads to similar outcomes, and thus both are safe and effective methods of achieving humeral fixation in fracture patients.

[Endoprosthesis in proximal humerus fractures -What is important?]

In cases of complex proximal humeral fractures a fracture prosthesis is an established treatment option. In the geriatric patient population, the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is gaining in relevance. This article focuses on the specific requirements and challenges associated with the application of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Decisive for the success are a structured perioperative management, meticulous preoperative planning, thorough patient education and standardized protocols for infection and bleeding prophylaxis. Intraoperatively, emphasis is placed on precise implantation techniques and stable tuberosity fixation, of which the latter is essential for postoperative function. A humeral inclination of 135° has been shown to be associated with better tuberosity healing. Complications, such as scapular notching or instability can be minimized through an accurate surgical technique and optimized implant management. Postoperative care is tailored to the individual, employing either a shoulder abduction brace or an early functional rehabilitation approach. Overall, reverse shoulder arthroplasty provides an effective fracture treatment for geriatric patients, ensuring long-term functional and clinical benefits.

Cow Hitch Cerclage Suture Fixation of the Greater Tuberosity in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Performed for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study With a Minimum Follow-up of 2 Years

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a well-established treatment option for complex proximal humeral fractures in older patients, with greater tuberosity (GT) healing being critical for achieving optimal clinical outcomes. We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes between 2 GT fixation techniques: the "cow hitch" (CH) cerclage suture fixation technique and conventional suture fixation technique.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study compared 20 consecutive patients who underwent RTSA using the CH cerclage suture fixation technique (CH group) with 29 consecutive patients who underwent RTSA using the conventional suture fixation technique (control group). Radiological healing of the GT was defined as the primary outcome parameter and assessed using standard radiographs at the last follow-up visit. Clinical outcomes were assessed as secondary outcome parameters and measured using the absolute and relative Constant-Murley scores (aCS and rCS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcome satisfaction (PROS).

Results

At a mean follow-up at 47 ± 30 (range, 24-120) months, the radiographic findings revealed a 95% healing rate of the GT in the CH group compared with a 66% healing rate in the control group (p = 0.03). No secondary displacement was observed in the CH group, whereas 5 cases (17%) were observed in the control group (p = 0.14). Overall, aCS, rCS, SSV, ROM (flexion, abduction, external rotation), and PROS were significantly higher in the CH group than in the control group (p-values: 0.03, 0.002, 0.004, 0.03, 0.01, 0.01, 0.047, respectively).

Conclusion

Compared with the conventional suture GT fixation technique, the CH cerclage suture fixation technique in RTSA performed for complex proximal humerus fractures resulted in higher healing rates with no secondary displacement of the GT, improved clinical outcomes, and enhanced patient satisfaction.

Level of Evidence

Level III (Retrospective cohort study). See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Revision of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a scoping review of indications for revision, and revision outcomes, complications, and rerevisions

BACKGROUND

The incidence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has been rising steadily over the last decade given broadening indications and increased familiarity with the procedure. With this increasing prevalence, the rate of revision of an rTSA has increased as well. Presently, there is a lack of clarity regarding outcomes after revision of an rTSA. The present review aimed to systematically examine studies assessing outcomes of revision rTSA following a failed primary rTSA or revision rTSA. Outcomes of interest include indications for revision, changes in patient-reported outcome measures, postoperative complications, and rerevisions associated with revision rTSA.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted for relevant studies. Studies were included if they assessed outcomes in patients undergoing revision rTSA following a primary rTSA or a failed revision rTSA with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and reporting relevant clinical outcome measures. Descriptive statistics were calculated for reported outcomes. Quality assessment was performed using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies instrument.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included in the final analysis, comprising 346 patients with 355 revised shoulders. The pooled cohort had a mean age of 69 years (range: 63-73 years) and a mean follow-up of 39 months (range: 12-67 months). The primary reasons for revision were dislocation or instability (30%), baseplate complications (25%), and infection (23%). The overall complication rate postrevision was 32%, with a rerevision rate of 27%. The most commonly reported postoperative complications included dislocation or instability (22%), fractures (18%), hematoma (15%), and baseplate issues including loosening, failure, and dissociation (12%). Major complications requiring rerevision surgery were led by dislocation or instability (28%), followed by baseplate complications (20%), infection (15%), and fracture (13%). Reported outcomes of revision rTSA are favorable with improvements in patient-reported outcome measures that exceed the minimal clinically important difference present in 83% of studies for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, 40% for Simple Shoulder Test, and 100% for both visual analog scale pain and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores.

CONCLUSION

The most common indications for revision rTSA following failed primary or revision rTSA were dislocation or instability, baseplate issues, and infection. One-third of patients after revision of a failed rTSA sustained a complication, most commonly being dislocation and periprosthetic fractures. While rTSA revision for failed rTSA yields favorable functional outcome scores, there remains a significant risk of complication which may require further revisions.

Effectiveness over time of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for acute proximal humeral fracture

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has proven to be an effective surgical procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears, comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus, and shoulder arthroplasty revision surgeries. We know from the literature that the functional results are good in the short term, but not whether these results remain stable in the long term or, on the contrary, show deterioration in functionality.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the functionality, degree of satisfaction, complications, and prosthesis survival at different cut-off points in patients with complex proximal humerus fractures treated with rTSA, with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 7 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Analytical, longitudinal, and prospective observational study of a cohort of patients treated for a fracture of the proximal humerus with Prótesis Inversa de Hombro. Functional outcome was assessed using the Constant Score and the Constant adjusted for age and gender of the patients. Quality of life was measured using the University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Assessment scale and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score scale. In addition, range of motion, pain, and radiologic variables of loosening, scapular notching, and tuberosity consolidation were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were included with a mean postoperative follow-up of 8.3 years (range 7-12 years). There was a progressive and significant decrease in Constant Score at 5 and 7 years follow-up compared to the baseline assessment 2 years after surgery, although the effect size was not significant. The age- and sex-adjusted Constant as well as the University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Assessment scale did not show statistically significant variations at follow-up. Both shoulder abduction and anterior shoulder flexion correlated well with the final Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score scale score. Radiologic variables did not influence any of the study outcome variables.

CONCLUSION

The functionality and quality of life of patients with complex proximal humerus fractures treated with rTSA decreased significantly compared to the 2-year evaluation, although this change was not clinically relevant. Survival of rTSA was satisfactory in the medium to long term with a low complication rate.

Complications following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is an increasingly common procedure for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), but postoperative complications have not been well characterized. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess complications and revision rates following rTSA in the management of PHFs as documented in current literature.

Methods

A systematic review was performed on primary rTSA for PHFs. In adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search was conducted between September and December of 2023, utilizing the databases PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to include relevant articles from any period. A total of 102 studies were identified for inclusion after initial screening of 3800 query results. Extracted data from each article included the publishing journal, level of evidence, study design, number of patients, mean age, age range, percent female, mean follow-up, specific postoperative complications, total complications, complication rate, number of revisions, and revision rate. Overall complication rates were determined by dividing total complications by total patients and multiplying by 100, which also applied to revision rates.

Results

Among 10,797 primary rTSA cases for PHFs identified from 102 studies, the mean age of patients was 75.6 ± 3.6 years, and 82.6% of patients were female. The average follow-up was 38.9 ± 21.0 months. The overall complication rate was 7.0% (754/10,797) with a range of 0% to 46.9%. The most common postoperative complications were prosthetic instability/dislocation (2.3%, 244/10,797; range: 0%-7%) and infection (1.2%, 131/10,797; range: 0%-2.5%). Periprosthetic fracture (0.8%), nerve injury (0.3%), and other complications were also documented. The overall revision rate was 3.3% (355/10,797; range: 0%-28%).

Conclusion

This systematic review summarizes the most common postoperative complications of rTSA for PHFs. The most frequent complication was prosthetic instability/dislocation, followed by infection. While the average total complication and revision rates were relatively low, there was wide variability, with some studies reporting rates as high as 46% and 28%, respectively.

Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: is it a safe option for elderly patients with proximal humerus fractures?

PURPOSE

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a common surgical procedure for elderly patients with proximal humerus fractures. Cement fixation of the humeral stem is considered the gold standard for this procedure. Due to the high prevalence of osteoporosis in this patient population, the risk of intraoperative fractures is increased when uncemented stems are used. Stem loosening is another concern of uncemented stems. However, the use of cement is associated with the risk of cement embolisation, impairment of tuberosity healing, and technical difficulties for later revisions. This study aimed (i) to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients treated with uncemented RSA for proximal humerus fractures at two years postoperatively, and (ii) to compare these outcomes between patients with and without decreased low bone quality as measured by the deltoid tuberosity index.

METHODS

The single-centre prospective study included 54 shoulders (52 patients) with a proximal humerus fracture between 2019 and 2022. Enrolled were patients aged 65 and older with acute or secondary displaced three- or four-part fractures or head-split fractures treated with RSA using the same uncemented system and tubercula refixation. At 24 months post-surgery, clinical evaluations included range of motion (ROM), Constant-Murley Score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score. Radiological assessments evaluated scapular notching, radiolucent lines, and greater tuberosity healing.

RESULTS

The mean age was 79 years (± 8), 87% were female, and 69% had osteoporotic fractures. At the two-year follow-up, the median SSV was 90% (IQR 80-95), the median CS Score was 76.5 (IQR 72-81), and the median ASES Score was 89.9 (IQR 82-93). The ROM measurements were: median active forward flexion 140° (IQR 120-160), median external rotation 30° (IQR 20-40), and median active internal rotation 6 (IQR 4-8). The greater tuberosity healing rate was 94.5%. Although osteoporotic fractures occurred more often in older patients (mean 81 vs. 72 years, respectively), no other significant differences were detected between the groups. One case of aseptic stem loosening occurred in the non-osteoporotic group.

CONCLUSION

Even in osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures, cementless stems combined with tubercula refixation resulted in favourable outcomes and were not associated with increased complications.

Turned stem tension band technique in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture can achieve high tuberosity healing rates regardless of the vertical sutures

Background

The importance of tuberosity healing in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) has been recognized. The turned stem tension band (TSTB) technique has been applied to tuberosity repair, and high bone healing and low reduction loss rates have been reported. Vertical sutures were added to the original method to reinforce fixation. We hypothesized that vertical sutures would be unnecessary in case the supraspinatus tendon was resected. This study aimed to compare the TSTB technique with or without vertical suturing for PHFs and evaluate the rates of tuberosity healing and reduction loss.

Methods

Thirty five patients (vertical suture group: 18 cases and nonvertical suture group: 17 cases) underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for complex PHFs using the TSTB technique. We evaluated the postoperative range of motion, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, tuberosity healing rates, and reduction loss.

Results

The vertical and nonvertical suture groups showed no significant difference in flexion (119 ± 33° vs. 124 ± 23°, P = .95), abduction (116 ± 35° vs. 115 ± 27°, P = .78), external rotation (27 ± 12° vs. 21 ± 8°, P = .16), internal rotation (6 ± 4° lumbar 3 level vs. 6 ± 4°, lumbar 3 level P = .87), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (77.3 ± 10.7 vs. 81.6 ± 6.3, P = .59), Numerical Rating Scale scores (1.2 ± 0.9 vs. 0.8 ± 0.9, P = .13), and tuberosity reduction loss (P = .34). The tuberosity healing rate in both groups was 100%.

Conclusion

The TSTB technique for PHFs provided high tuberosity healing and low reduction loss rates regardless of vertical sutures.

Optimal combination of arthroplasty type, fixation method, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol for complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to define the optimal combination of surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol for elderly patients undergoing either hemiarthroplasty (HA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for acute proximal humerus fracture (PHF) by performing a network meta-analysis of the comparative studies in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was screened from 2007 to 2023. Inclusion criteria were level I-IV studies utilizing primary HA and/or rTSA published in a peer-reviewed journal, that specified whether humeral stems were cemented or noncemented, specified postoperative rehabilitation protocol, and reported results of HA and/or rTSA performed for PHF. Early range of motion (ROM) was defined as the initiation of active ROM at ≤3 weeks after surgery. Level of evidence was evaluated based on the criteria by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist approach to network meta-analysis with a random-effects model that was performed using the netmeta package version 0.9-6 in R.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies (1119 patients) were included with an average age of 74 ± 3.7 and mean follow-up of 32 ± 11.1 months. In the early ROM cohort (Early), the mean time to active ROM was 2.4 ± 0.76 weeks compared to 5.9 ± 1.04 weeks in the delayed ROM cohort (Delayed). Overall, rTSA-Pressfit-Early resulted in statistically superior outcomes including postoperative forward elevation (126 ± 27.5), abduction (116 ± 30.6), internal rotation (5.27 ± 0.74, corresponding to L3-L1), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (71.8 ± 17), tuberosity union (89%), and lowest tuberosity nonunion rate (9.6%) in patients ≥65 year old with acute PHF undergoing shoulder arthroplasty (all P ≤ .05). In total there were 277 (14.5%) complications across the cohorts, of which 89/277 (34%) were in the HA-Cement-Delayed cohort. HA-Cement-Delayed resulted in 2-times higher odds of experiencing a complication when compared to rTSA-Cement-Delayed (P = .005). Conversely, rTSA-Cement-Early cohort followed by rTSA-Pressfit-Early resulted in a total complication rate of 4.7% and 5.4% (odds ratios, 0.30; P = .01 & odds ratios, 0.42; P = .05), respectively. The total rate of scapular notching was higher in the cemented rTSA subgroups (16.5%) vs. (8.91%) in the press fit rTSA subgroups (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that patients ≥65 years of age, who sustain a 3-or 4-part PHF achieve the most benefit in terms of ROM, postoperative functional outcomes, tuberosity union, and overall complication rate when undergoing rTSA with a noncemented stem and early postoperative ROM when compared to the mainstream preference-rTSA-Cement-Delayed.

Management of Proximal Humerus Fracture With Concurrent Axillary Artery Injury Using a Saphenous Vein Graft and Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis: A Case Report

This case report details the management of a 60-year-old male who sustained a complex proximal humerus fracture with an axillary artery injury following a fall. Initial assessment revealed a fractured humeral head and complete occlusion of the axillary artery, which was repaired using a saphenous vein graft. Subsequently, the patient underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) after the limb stabilized. The staged approach, prioritizing urgent vascular repair followed by delayed orthopedic intervention, proved effective. The patient achieved satisfactory functional recovery with an improved range of motion and no pain. This case highlights the importance of prompt diagnosis and treatment of vascular injuries in complex proximal humeral fractures and supports the use of saphenous vein grafting and RTSA as effective management strategies.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty versus Non-Operative Treatment of Three-Part and Four-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly Patient: A Pooled Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: The treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients is not yet fully elucidated. Of all treatment options, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and non-operative treatment (NOT) appear to provide the best results. Evidence to guide the choice between the two is sparse. Therefore, this review provides an overview of the available evidence on RSA versus NOT. Methods: Studies comparing complex proximal humerus fractures in patients aged >65 years treated either with RSA or NOT were included for systematic review and direct comparison via pooled analysis of patient-rated outcome and range of motion. Indirect comparison of case series and non-comparative studies on either treatment was performed separately. Results: Three comparative studies including 77 patients treated with RSA and 81 treated non-operatively were analysed. The RSA group scored better for both the Constant-Murley score (mean difference 6 points) and DASH score (mean difference 8 points). No differences were detected in ASES, PENN score, pain scores, or range of motion between treatment groups. The most common complications for RSA were infection (3%), nerve injury (2%), and dislocation (2%). Reoperation was required in 5%. In the NOT group, common complications included malunion (42%), osteonecrosis (25%), and non-union (3%); no reoperation was required. Patient satisfaction was equal in both groups. Conclusions: The functional outcomes and range of motion after RSA seemed satisfactory and potentially superior to NOT in elderly patients. Patient satisfaction was comparable despite a high malunion and osteonecrosis rate in the non-operative treatment group, which did not require re-interventions.

Proximal humerus fracture and acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Proximal humerus fractures and injuries to the acromioclavicular joint are among the most common traumatic diseases of the upper extremity. Fractures of the proximal humerus occur most frequently in older people and are an indicator fracture of osteoporosis. While a large proportion of only slightly displaced fractures can be treated non-operatively, more complex fractures require surgical treatment. The choice of optimal treatment and the decision between joint-preserving surgery by means of osteosynthesis or endoprosthetic treatment is often a difficult decision in which both fracture morphology factors and individual factors should be taken into account. If endoprosthetic treatment is indicated, satisfactory long-term functional and clinical results have been achieved with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint occur primarily in young, athletic individuals. The common classification according to Rockwood divides the injury into 6 degrees of severity depending on the dislocation. This classification forms the basis for the decision on non-operative or surgical treatment. The indication for surgical treatment for higher-grade injuries is the subject of controversial debate in the latest literature. In chronic injuries, an autologous tendon transplant is also performed. Whereas in the past, treatment was often carried out using a hook plate, which was associated with complications, the gold standard today is minimally invasive treatment using Endobutton systems. This review provides an overview of the two injury patterns and discusses the various treatment options.

Tuberosity refixation improves functional outcome following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humeral fracture

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this prospective study was to examine clinical results of tuberosity refixation in RSA for the treatment of displaced PHF in elderly patients. We hypothesized that tuberosity refixation would increase clinical outcome.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 50 patients were included after receive a primary RSA for complex proximal humeral fracture between March 2013 and December 2015 for follow-up after three, 12 and 24 months. A functional and radiological assessment was performed on the patients.

RESULTS

At final follow-up after a mean period of 25.1 months, data were available for 30 women and 6 men (74% of the included overall study collective) with a mean age of 77 years (range 55-93 years) at time of surgery. The tuberosities were refixated in 74% (n = 37) and in 26% (n = 13) resected. RSA with tuberosity refixation resulted in better clinical shoulder function compared to RSA with non-refixated tuberosities. The data show an external rotation with a significant difference (24.9° vs. 14°, p < 0.05) in favor of participants with refixation. The raw CMS was statistically significant (71.3 vs. 56.3, p < 0.05) after refixation, and SSV was significant improved (82.7% vs. 68%, p < 0.05) in the same group. Among 3 of 50 patients a total of 3 complications occurred with a total of 6% surgical revision.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study, tuberosity refixation as part of fracture treatment using RSA results in better external rotation, subjective assessment of shoulder recovery (measured by SSV and by raw CMS) in elderly patients, compared with tuberosity excision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Prospective comparative study.

Satisfactory Short-Term Outcomes of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Complex Three- and Four-Part Fractures of the Humeral Head in Octogenarians

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures with severe comminution and poor bone quality are among the most common injuries in the elderly population. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been widely used to manage complex three- and four-part humeral head fractures. The purpose of the present study was to report the result of this technique in the demanding population of octogenarians.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Twenty-six patients above the age of 80 years were included in the study and followed for a minimum of one-year follow-up. To assess the functional outcomes the postoperative range of motion (ROM), the Constant score, the visual analog scale for pain, and the disability of the arm and shoulder score (DASH) were measured at 6 and 12 months. Radiological assessment and potential complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 81.9 years (81-86) at the time of surgery. There was a statistically significant improvement in all outcomes over the follow-up intervals. Shoulder ROM was 125.7o for flexion, 98.2o for abduction, 42.2o for internal rotation, and 43.2o for external rotation at 12 months. The mean Constant, DASH, and VAS scores at the last follow-up were 61.3, 31.9, and 0.5, respectively. Reported complications include one superficial surgical site infection.

CONCLUSION

RSA is a safe and reliable surgical option with satisfactory outcomes to manage complex three- and four-part fractures of the humeral head as it can provide prompt pain relief and function in octogenarians.

Is malunion of the greater tuberosity after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with complex proximal humerus fracture associated with worse clinical outcomes? A prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To assess patient outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with complex proximal humerus fracture and the clinical implications of greater tuberosity malunions.

METHODS

This prospective study included 56 patients who underwent RSA (DELTA XTEND™, DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA) to treat proximal humerus fractures. We used a standardized suture technique to reattach the tuberosities. Demographic, comorbidity, and radiological parameters were collected. Assessments at 2-year follow-up (n = 49) are given as follows: range of motion (ROM), pain level, Constant Murley scores (CS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), and tuberosity healing.

RESULTS

Anatomic tuberosity healing was achieved in 31 (55%) patients (group 1), 14 (25%) had a malunion (group 2), and complete migration occurred in 11 (20%) (group 3). No statistically significant differences between groups 1 and 2 were detected: CS (p = 0.53), SSV (p = 0.07), ROM (forward flexion (FF) p = 0.19, internal rotation (IR) p = 0.34, and external rotation (ER) p = 0.76). Group 3 had poorer outcomes (median [IQR]) than group 1: CS (59 [50-71]) vs. 72 [65-78]), FF (120 [100-150]) vs. 150 [125-160] and ER (- 20 [- 20 to 10] vs. 30 [20-45], respectively. Three complications (group 1) occurred: one-stage revision after low-grade infection, haematoma due to early rivaroxaban intake, and open reduction and internal fixation for acromion insufficiency fracture. No patients showed signs of stem or glenoid loosening after 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Cases with complete superior migration experienced poorer clinical outcomes than those with anatomic healing. Despite a relatively high malunion rate, the outcomes were not significantly worse in these patients compared to anatomically healed GT cases.

Anatomic greater tuberosity healing does not influence the functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures

Background

To investigate the functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in acute complex proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in patients with an anatomic greater tuberosity union in comparison to patients with a displaced or resorbed tuberosity.

Method

It is a retrospective study with prospective data collection including 32 consecutive PHF with a minimum two-year follow-up treated with RSA. A radiological study and a CT scan were performed specifically for the study. Two shoulder surgeons and a musculoskeletal radiologist assessed the position and union of the greater tuberosity. The functional outcomes were assessed with the Constant-Murley, DASH, ASES and ADLER scores.

Results

The mean overall CS was 59.55. In 17 cases, the greater tuberosity healed in an anatomical position. In 15 cases, it was non-anatomical. In 53% of patients, greater tuberosity union was obtained. The CS was 62.76 in the anatomic union group and 55.9 in the non-anatomic union group. No significant differences were observed. No differences were observed in the ASES, DASH and ADLER scores.

Conclusion

After RSA for PHF, anatomic greater tuberosity healing was obtained in 53% of patients. The influence of the position and union of the greater tuberosity on the functional results could not be evidenced.

Improved outcomes of older patients with acute and displaced proximal humerus fractures treated with window bone ingrowth fracture-specific stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) in the older people population remains controversial. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a popular surgical treatment option that provides improved and reproducible results. However, the relevance of fracture-specific stem designs for RSA to improve tuberosity consolidation and shoulder function remains debatable.

METHODS

This study included all patients 70 years or older with acute and displaced PHFs primarily treated with RSA at a single institution in Portugal, between January 2010 and December 2019 who participated in a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients (15 men and 97 women) with a median clinical follow-up of 52 months were included. The mean age at the time of fracture was 78.6 years. All fractures were classified as Neer types 3 and 4 (n = 50 and n = 62, respectively). A window bone ingrowth fracture-specific stem was used for 86 patients, and a conventional humeral stem was used for 26 patients. Regarding the tuberosity fixation technique, 76 tuberosities were attached using technique A (according to Boileau's principles), 36 tuberosities were attached using technique B (not following Boileau's principles) and 11cases were classified as technique C (if fixation was not possible). The overall survival rate during the 2-year follow-up was 88.2%; however, this decreased to 79% at 5 years. Only three patients had complications (two infections and one dislocation) requiring revision surgery. In the multivariable analysis, the tuberosity fixation technique (P = 0.012) and tuberosity anatomical consolidation (P < 0.001) were associated with improved Constant scores (median Constant Score 62.67 (technique A), 55.32 (technique B), 49.70 (technique C). Fracture-specific humeral implants (P = 0.051), the tuberosity fixation technique (P = 0.041), tuberosity anatomical consolidation (P < 0.001), and dementia influenced the achievement of functional mobility (P = 0.014). Tuberosity anatomic consolidation was positively associated with bone ingrowth fracture-specific humeral implants (P < 0.01) and a strong tuberosity fixation technique (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

RSA is used for complex and displaced fractures of the proximal humerus in older patients. Dementia was negatively correlated with functional outcomes. A window bone ingrowth fracture-specific stem combined with strong tuberosity fixation can yield better clinical and radiological results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II; prospective comparative study; treatment study.

A novel "7 sutures and 8 knots" surgical technique in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: tuberosity healing improves short-term clinical results

BACKGROUND

Complex proximal humeral fractures (cPHFs) represent an important public health concern, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has emerged as a feasible treatment option in the elderly with high functional demands. Recent studies have shown that tuberosity healing leads to better clinical outcomes and an improved range of motion. However, the best surgical technique for the management of the tuberosities is still a topic of debate. The purpose of this retrospective observational study is to report the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a consecutive series of patients who underwent RSA for cPHFs using a novel "7 sutures and 8 knots" technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of 32 patients (33 shoulders) were treated with this technique by a single surgeon from January 2017 to September 2021. Results at a minimum follow-up of 12 months and a mean ± SD follow-up of 35.9 ± 16.2 (range 12-64) months are reported.

RESULTS

The tuberosity union rate was 87.9% (29 out of 33 shoulders), the mean Constant score was 66.7 ± 20.5 (range 29-100) points, and the mean DASH score was 33.4 ± 22.6 (range 2-85) points.

CONCLUSIONS

The "7 sutures and 8 knots" technique, which relies on three sutures around the implant and five bridging sutures between the tuberosities, is a relatively simple procedure which provides a reliable means for anatomic restoration of the tuberosities and allows functional recovery of the shoulder in elderly patients with cPHFs treated with RSA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective atudy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

At our institution, no institutional review board nor ethical committee approval is necessary for retrospective studies.

[Translated article] Influence of lateralized reverse shoulder prosthesis design on tuberosity union in proximal humerus fractures

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humerus fractures are the third most frequent type of fracture in elderly patients. Nowadays, surgical treatment is indicated one third of the time, being the reverse shoulder prosthesis an option especially in complex comminuted patterns. In this study we analyzed the effects of a lateralized reverse prosthesis in tuberosity union and its relationship with the functional results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective case study of patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with a lateralized design reverse shoulder prosthesis with one-year minimum follow-up. Tuberosity nonunion was defined as a radiological concept: absence of tuberosity, distance >1cm from the tuberosity fragment to the humeral shaft or tuberosity above the humeral tray. Subgroup analysis was performed, group 1 (n=16) tuberosity union vs. group 2 (n=19) tuberosity nonunion. Groups were compared with the following functional scores: Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Subjective Shoulder Value.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were included in this study with a median age of 72.65 years. Postoperative radiographic analysis at one year after surgery revealed a tuberosity nonunion rate of 54%. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in terms of range of motion or functional scores. However, there were differences regarding the Patte sign (p=0.03) which was positive in a larger proportion of patients in the group with tuberosity nonunion.

CONCLUSION

Even though there was a large percentage of tuberosity nonunion with the use of a lateralized prosthesis design, patients obtained good results in a similar manner to those found in the union group in terms of range of motion, scores, and patient satisfaction.

How common is nerve injury after reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Nerve injury following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a known risk factor with wide ranging incidences reported. This systematic review evaluates the overall incidence of nerve injury following primary and revision RSA and summarizes the characteristics of the nerve injuries reported in the current literature.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using separate database searches (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane) following the PRISMA guidelines. Search criteria included the title terms "reverse shoulder," "reverse total shoulder," "inverted shoulder," and "inverted total shoulder" with publication dates ranging from 01/01/2010 to 01/01/2022. Studies that reported neurological injuries and complications were included and evaluated for primary RSA, revision RSA, number of nerve injuries, and which nerves were affected.

RESULTS

After exclusion, our systematic review consisted of 188 articles. A total of 40,146 patients were included, with 65% female. The weighted mean age was 70.3 years. The weighted mean follow-up was 35.4 months. The rate of nerve injury after RSA was 1.3% (510 of 40,146 RSAs). The rate of injury was greater in revision RSA compared to primary RSA (2.4% vs. 1.3%). Nerve injury was most common in RSAs done for a primary diagnosis of acute proximal humerus fracture (4.0%), followed by cuff tear arthropathy (3.0%), DJD (2.6%), and inflammatory arthritis (1.7%). Massive rotator cuff tears and post-traumatic arthritis cases had the lowest nerve injury rates (1.0% and 1.4%, respectively). The axillary nerve was the most commonly reported nerve that was injured in both primary and revision RSA (0.6%), followed by the ulnar nerve (0.26%) and median nerve (0.23%). Brachial plexus injury was reported in 0.19% of overall RSA cases.

CONCLUSION

Based on current English literature, nerve injuries occur at a rate of 1.3% after primary RSA compared with 2.4% after revision RSA. The most common nerve injury was to the axillary nerve (0.64%), with the most common operative diagnosis associated with nerve injury after RSA being acute proximal humerus fracture (4.0%). Surgeons should carefully counsel patients prior to surgery regarding the risk of nerve injury.

30-Day Postoperative Complications After Surgical Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors associated with complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was conducted. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients treated for proximal humerus fracture with reverse TSA or hemiarthroplasty between 2005 and 2018.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred sixty-three shoulder arthroplasties were conducted: 436 hemiarthroplasties and 1,127 reverse TSA. The overall complication rate was 15.4% (15.7% reverse TSA; 14.7% hemiarthroplasty) (P = 0.636). Most frequent complications included transfusion 11.1%, unplanned readmission 3.8%, and revision surgery 2.1%. A 1.1% incidence of thromboembolic events was noted. Complications occurred most frequently in patients older than 65 years; male; and patients with anemia, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III-IV, inpatient procedure, bleeding disorders, duration of surgery >106 minutes, and length of stay >2.5 days. Patients with body mass index >36 kg/m2 had a decreased risk of 30-day postoperative complications.

DISCUSSION

There was a 15.4% complication rate in the early postoperative period. In addition, no notable difference was found in complication rates between groups (hemiarthroplasty: 14.7%; reverse TSA 15.7%). Future studies are needed to determine whether there is a difference between these groups in the long-term outcome and survivorship of these implants.

Functional outcome and CEUS-assessed deltoid muscle vitality after fracture-specific versus standard prosthetic design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for trauma

Functional outcome after reverse-shoulder-arthroplasty (RSA) in proximal humerus fractures (PHF) depends on deltoid muscle integrity and successful reattachment of the tuberosities for best possible recovery of rotator-cuff function. In this monocentric, prospective, randomized, controlled trial we investigated whether a reverse-fracture-prosthesis (RFP) with a metaphyseal fenestrated stem achieved superior shoulder and muscle function compared to a common reverse-prosthesis (RP) design for patients with PHF. Our hypothesis was that patients with RFP may achieve a superior healing rate of the greater tuberosity (GT) compared to patients receiving RP, which translates to significantly higher clinical outcome and functional scores as well as differences in deltoid muscle microperfusion. Forty-four patients with PHF were randomized preoperatively to one of the prosthesis types in RSA between 2018 and 2020 (22 with RFP and 22 with RP) and prospectively assessed 6 months after surgery. We assessed osteointegration of the GT with radiographs 1 day and 6 months postoperatively and examined shoulder function and patient satisfaction by using established shoulder scores. A contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination of both shoulders was performed to quantify intramuscular blood flow and evaluate vitality of the deltoid muscle. None of the functional and psychosocial scores or radiographs and ultrasound examinations showed significant differences between the RSA designs. The constant-Murley score (p = 0.384) and active anterior-elevation-abduction, and external rotation were comparable between the RFP and RP group. Similar healing rates of the GT were observed (p = 0.655). CEUS-assessed deltoid microperfusion revealed equivalent muscle vitality for both groups (p = 0.312). Level of evidence: Level II; Randomized Controlled Trial; Treatment Study. Clinical significance: The radiographic evaluation for the investigation of the GT healing rate indicates that the proclaimed benefits of the fracture prosthesis with fenestration design might not be as great as expected.

Greater Tuberosity Fractures after RTSA: A Matched Group Analysis

Periprosthetic fractures, such as acromial and spine fractures, are known complications following implantation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The entity of greater tuberosity fractures (GTF) has rarely been studied in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of postoperative greater tuberosity fractures after RTSA compared to a matched control group. The main findings of this study are that a GTF after RTSA is associated with worse clinical outcome scores (mean absolute CS 50 ± 19 (p = 0.032); SSV 63% ± 26 (p = 0.022); mean force 1 kg ± 2 kg (p = 0.044)) compared with the control group (mean absolute CS 62 ± 21; SSV 77% ± 29; mean force 2 kg ± 2 kg). In terms of postoperative range of motion, the fracture group was significantly worse in terms of external rotation (17° ± 19° vs. 30° ± 19° (p = 0.029)). Internal rotation, flexion, as well as abduction of the shoulder appear to be unaffected (internal rotation GTF 4 ± 2, control group 5 ± 3 (p = 0.138); flexion GTF 102° ± 28°, control group 114° ± 27° (p = 0.160); abduction GTF 109° ± 42°, control group 120° ± 39° (p = 0.317)).

Is the Position and Union of the Tuberosities Assessable by Means of the Simple Radiograph After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Complex Proximal Humerus Fractures?

Background

The assessment of tuberosity position and union in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for complex proximal humerus fractures (PHF) has been carried out by means of routine simple radiographs. To evaluate the interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of the simple radiograph in comparison to the CT scan.

Methods

The position and consolidation of the tuberosities in 2 radiographic projections and in a CT scan of 32 consecutive patients operated on a RSA for PHF was assessed by 5 observers. Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility in both imaging tests were also assessed.

Results

The interobserver agreement for the greater tuberosity position was 0.52 in the simple radiograph and 0.45 in the CT scan. For the greater tuberosity union, agreement was moderate in the simple radiograph (0.52), but fair in the CT scan (0.35). For the lesser tuberosity position and union, the agreement was fair in the radiograph and poor in the CT scan.

Conclusion

Only moderate agreement was observed in the assessment of the position and union of the tuberosities in the RSA for PHF in the simple radiograph and no improvement in it was seen for the 2D CT scan.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a comparison of the deltoid split and deltopectoral approaches

INTRODUCTION

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a common treatment for three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures. RSA is commonly performed through a deltopectoral (DP) surgical approach; however, a deltoid split (DS) approach has been described. The purpose of this study was to compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing RSA for proximal humerus fractures through a DP and DS approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who underwent RSA for proximal humerus fractures at our level 1 trauma center was performed. Patients were evaluated at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Intraoperative outcomes as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed. Postoperative complications, reoperation rates, and radiographic outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were included in the DP group and 13 patients in the DS group. The average follow-up was 28.6 months in the DP group and 21.1 months in the DS group. There were no significant differences in patient demographics or injury characteristics. Operative time was significantly shorter in the DS group (103 min) compared to the DP group (123 min). Tuberosity repair was performed in 81.3% of patients in the DP group and 92.3% of patients in the DS group. No significant differences were found in PROMs at final follow-up. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications. Three patients in the DP group and one patient in the DS group required reoperation. Lastly, 81.8% of patients achieved tuberosity union in the DS group and 66.7% in the DP group; however, this did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that RSA for proximal humerus fractures performed through a DS or DP approach may result in similar intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, with no difference in reoperation or complication rates.

Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical outcome and tuberosity healing?

INTRODUCTION

The employment of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for dislocated proximal humerus fractures of elderly patients becomes increasingly relevant. The standard inclination angle of the humeral component was 155°. Lately, there is a trend towards smaller inclination angles of 145° or 135°. Additionally, there has been an increased focus on the lateralization of the glenosphere. This retrospective comparative study evaluates clinical and radiological results of patients treated for proximal humerus fractures by reverse shoulder arthroplasty with different inclination angles of the humeral component, which was either 135° or 155°. Additionally, a different lateral offset of the glenosphere, which was either 0 mm or 4 mm, was used.

METHODS

For this retrospective comparative analysis, 58 out of 66 patients treated by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures were included. The minimum follow-up was 24 months. Thirty (m = 3, f = 27; mean age 78 years; mean FU 35 months, range 24-58 months) were treated with a standard 155° humeral component and a glenosphere without lateral offset (group A), while 28 patients (m = 2, f = 26; mean age 79 years; mean FU 30 months, range 24-46 months) were treated with a 135° humeral component and a glenosphere with a 4 mm lateral offset (group B). We determined range of motion, Constant score, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score as clinical outcomes and evaluated tuberosity healing as well as scapula notching.

RESULTS

Neither forward flexion (A = 128°, B = 121°; p = 0.710) nor abduction (A = 111°, B = 106°; p = 0.327) revealed differences between the groups. The mean Constant Score rated 63 in group A, while it was 61 in group B (p = 0.350). There were no differences of the ASES Score between the groups (A = 74, B = 72; p = 0.270). There was an increased risk for scapula notching in group A (47%) in comparison to group B (4%, p = 0.001). Healing of the greater tuberosity was achieved in 57% of group A and in 75% of group B (p = 0.142). The healing rate of the lesser tuberosity measured 33% in group A and 71% in group B (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Both inclination angles of the humeral component are feasible options for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Neither the inclination angle nor the lateral offset of the glenosphere seem to have a relevant influence on the clinical outcome. The healing rate of the lesser tuberosity was higher in implants with a decreased neck-shaft angle. There is an increased risk for scapula notching, if a higher inclination angle of the humeral component is chosen.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. Retrospective comparative study.

Influence of lateralized reverse shoulder prosthesis design on tuberosity union in proximal humerus fractures

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humerus fractures are the third most frequent type of fracture in elderly patients. Nowadays, surgical treatment is indicated one third of the time, being the reverse shoulder prosthesis an option especially in complex comminuted patterns. In this study we analyzed the effects of a lateralized reverse prosthesis in tuberosity union and its relationship with the functional results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective case study of patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with a lateralized design reverse shoulder prosthesis with one-year minimum follow-up. Tuberosity nonunion was defined as a radiological concept: absence of tuberosity, distance>1cm from the tuberosity fragment to the humeral shaft or tuberosity above the humeral tray. Subgroup analysis was performed, group 1 (n=16) tuberosity union vs. group 2 (n=19) tuberosity nonunion. Groups were compared with the following functional scores: Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Subjective Shoulder Value.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were included in this study with a median age of 72.65 years. Postoperative radiographic analysis at one year after surgery revealed a tuberosity nonunion rate of 54%. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in terms of range of motion or functional scores. However, there were differences regarding the Patte sign (p=0.03) which was positive in a larger proportion of patients in the group with tuberosity nonunion.

CONCLUSION

Even though there was a large percentage of tuberosity nonunion with the use of a lateralized prosthesis design, patients obtained good results in a similar manner to those found in the union group in terms of range of motion, scores, and patient satisfaction.

[Fracture analysis, indication for endoprosthesis and implant selection in proximal humeral fractures]

Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are the third most common fracture in humans and the incidence is increasing. There are basically three treatment strategies: conservative, joint-preserving reconstructive or joint-replacing procedures. In addition to fracture morphology, patient-specific and surgeon-specific factors are particularly important when deciding on treatment. The experience and training of the surgeon also play a decisive role. In the case of joint-preserving treatment, the risk of osteosynthesis failure and of sequelae of the fracture must always be assessed. If conservative or reconstructive treatment methods are not promising, the joint-replacing procedure is the treatment of choice. The anatomical fracture prosthesis is only indicated, if at all, for young patients with a destroyed humeral head with a preserved rotator cuff and large fragments of the tuberosities. In advanced age, the implantation of a reverse endoprosthesis is increasingly used for dislocated, multifragmentary PHF. In both procedures, the anatomical healing of the tuberosities has a significant impact on the functional outcome.

Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture treatment: a retrospective functional outcome analysis

PURPOSE

Following proximal humeral fractures hemiarthroplasty (HA) or reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are performed if osteosynthesis or conservative treatment is not possible. HA has been reported to result in decreased functional outcomes compared with rTSA. Secondary shoulder arthroplasty, performed after a different initial treatment, has also been associated with inferior outcomes.

METHODS

Patients recieving a shoulder arthroplasty related to a proximal humeral fracture from 2010 to 2019 were included. A retrospective analysis of functional outcomes was performed using QuickDASH and subjective shoulder value (SSV).

RESULTS

The mean [standard deviation (SD)] follow-up time among the 82 included patients was 48 (28) months. The mean age was 70 (10) years. The mean age for HA was significantly different from rTSA [57 (9) and 72 (21) years; p < .001]. The mean QuickDASH score for primary arthroplasty was 11 (2) versus 12 (16) for secondary arthroplasty (p = .313). The mean SSV for primary arthroplasty was 84 (22) versus 82 (17) for secondary arthroplasty (p = .578). The mean QuickDASH score for HA was 24 (36) versus 9 (15) for rTSA (p = .346). The mean SSV for HA was 70 (34) versus 86 (17) for rTSA (p = .578).

CONCLUSION

Functional outcomes after fracture-related shoulder arthroplasty were excellent in an older population, even when performed secondarily after failed primary osteosynthesis or conservative treatment. No significant differences in shoulder function were identified between rTSA and HA, likely due to restrictive indications for HA.

Outcome of geriatric proximal humeral fractures: a comparison between reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation

Objectives:

In view of the increased attention to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) as a treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly, the present study analyzes in-hospital complications and the postoperative management of rTSA versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed patients hospitalized from 2016 to 2018 for proximal humeral fractures (ICD-9 codes: S42.21), III- and IV-part, who underwent an ORIF with locking plates, rTSA or nonoperative treatment. In-hospital complications and postoperative management in both groups were included in the analysis.

Results:

We included n 190 patients (ORIF 90, rTSA 71, nonoperative 29), more likely to be female (82.1% vs 17.9%; P < .01) with an average age of 82years (min. 72, max. 99; SD 6.4). The ORIF and the rTSA groups showed comparable complication rates (15.6% vs 15%, P = .87) but with a significantly shorter hospital stay (8.6 vs 11.5days; P = .01) and shorter duration of surgery (72.9 vs 87.2 minutes; P = .01) in the ORIF group. Significantly more patients after ORIF achieved an independent life postoperatively (53.3% vs 40.8%; P = .013).

Conclusions:

In this retrospective analysis, ORIF is related to a shorter duration of surgery, a shorter hospital stay and a higher likelihood of independence. Despite the popularity of the rTSA, ORIF remains a reliable treatment option for proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.

Level of evidence: III

Prospective multicentre mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of 159 reverse total shoulder replacements and assessment of the influence of post-operative complications

BACKGROUND

The aim of our prospective multicentre study is to evaluate the five-year follow-up outcomes of primary reverse shoulder replacement utilizing two different designs of glenoid baseplates.

METHODS

There were 159 reverse shoulder replacements (91 cemented and 68 uncemented stems, 67 Trabecular Metal baseplates and 92 Anatomical Shoulder baseplates in 152 patients (99 women) with a mean age of 74.5 (58-90) years. The principal diagnosis was rotator cuff arthropathy in 108 shoulders.

RESULTS

Clinical and functional results improved significantly overall; the adjusted Constant Murley score improved from 28.2 ± 13.3 pre-operatively to 75.5 ± 22.8 (p < 0.0001) and the mean Subjective Shoulder Value improved from 27.5 ± 20 to 73.8 ± 21.3 points (p < 0.0001). Radiologically, there was good bony stability in 88% and 86% of cemented and uncemented stems without significant impact on the Constant Murley score and Subjective Shoulder Value at one, two and five years post-surgery. There were no significant clinical differences between Trabecular Metal and Anatomical Shoulder baseplates at five years. There were four cases of intraoperative shaft fractures that were managed with cables. Although the Trabecular Metal baseplates showed better integration radiologically, there was no significant difference in the mean of Constant Murley, Subjective Shoulder Value and the range of motion depending on the grade of inferior scapular notching at one-, two- and five-year intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty restores the function in shoulder with significant improvements in function and moderate complications with minor differences between both designs of baseplates that were not reflected clinically.

Hawkins wiring for three-part fractures of the proximal humerus: A case series

Three-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly continue to be difficult to surgically treat. We evaluated the Hawkins wiring (HW) technique, which utilizes figure-of-eight tension band wiring, to treat three-part proximal humerus fractures involving the greater tuberosity. Currently, there is a paucity of data detailing patient outcomes and radiographic follow-up of this technique. The purpose of this case series is to evaluate patient reported outcomes and radiographic follow-up for fractures treated with this technique. Over two years, six patients at our institution underwent HW to treat three-part proximal humerus fractures. Average DASH and Oxford Shoulder scores (OSS) were 20.4 (range, 1-40) and 40 (range, 33-46) respectively. All patients had satisfactory return of function after surgery. Radiographic union was achieved in all six patients and there were no reported complications. HW technique is an efficacious treatment for three-part proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients.

The clinical outcomes and tuberosity healing after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture using the turned stem tension band technique

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have reported the clinical effectiveness of tuberosity healing after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with proximal humeral fractures with respect to joint stability, long-term survival, and postoperative range of motion. However, it is challenging to achieve robust fixation of the fragile bone fragments in elderly patients. This study aimed to report on the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures using a Turned stem Tension Band technique-a simple suture configuration that can apply a compressive force on both tuberosities at the same time.

METHODS

Eighteen patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures (age 80.4 ± 4.7 years, range 70-87 years), using our Turned stem Tension Band technique, were included in this study and evaluated postoperatively for range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Numerical Rating Scale, and tuberosity healing, with minimum 2-years follow-up (mean 34.5 months, range 24-60 months).

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, mean range of motion results were active flexion, 119 ± 34°; active abduction, 116 ± 35°; active external rotation, 27 ± 12°; and active internal rotation, L3. Six of 11 (55%) patients with 4-part dislocated fractures had neurological disorders from the time of injury; of these, three patients obtained shoulder elevation under 90° at the final follow-up. The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 77.3 ± 10.7, and the mean Numerical Rating Scale was 1.2 ± 0.9. Fifteen of 18 (83%) patients were satisfied with the results. The tuberosity healing rate was 100% (18 of 18).

CONCLUSIONS

The Turned stem Tension Band technique in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures provides a robust fixation, regardless of the fracture pattern, which results in a high tuberosity healing rate.

Long-stemmed Hemiarthroplasty with Cerclage Wiring for the Treatment of Split-Head Fractures of the Proximal Humerus with Metaphyseal Extension: A Report of 2 Cases

Introduction

Complex fractures of the proximal humerus with splitting-head component and metaphyseal propagation are very rare injuries that are difficult to treat. Preservation of the humeral head is always considered except in cases with severe comminution and compromised vascularity where shoulder hemiarthroplasty is an alternative option.

Case Report

We present two male patients, 57- and 62-years-old who sustained such a complex proximal humeral fracture after a high-energy injury. They both managed with long-stemmed shoulder hemiarthroplasty and cerclage wiring of the metaphyseal area. They both demonstrated good clinical and radiological outcome at 32- and 24-months postoperatively.

Conclusion

We report the functional and radiological outcomes of two cases of a rare proximal humeral fracture's pattern - combination of splitting-head and metaphyseal comminution – that were managed with long-stemmed hemiarthroplasty and cerclage wire and demonstrated good midterm clinical outcome.

Fracture-Dedicated Prosthesis Promotes the Healing Rate of Greater Tuberosity in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming popular in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). Greater tuberosity healing may influence functional outcomes and range of motion (ROM) of shoulder after RSA. In addition, the design of prosthesis may impact the healing rate of greater tuberosity. The purpose of this study is to know: (1) does the healing of greater tuberosity affect the functional outcomes and ROM of shoulder? and (2) does the design of prosthesis affect the healing rate of greater tuberosity? Materials and Methods: PubMed, Ovid/Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing the clinical outcomes between the healed groups and the non-healed groups after RSA. Results: For functional outcomes, the results showed that the healed group had better Constant scores (CSs) (p < 0.0001). For ROM, the healed group showed better flexion (p < 0.0001), abduction (p = 0.02), and external rotation (p < 0.00001) of shoulder. For the design of prosthesis, the mean healing rate of greater tuberosity (82.7%) in patients with fracture-dedicated prosthesis was higher than those (63.0%) in patients with standard prosthesis. Subgroup analyses showed that the CS (p = 0.12) and abduction (p = 0.96) of patients using fracture-dedicated prostheses were not different between the healed groups and the non-healed groups. Meta-regression showed that there was no significant relationship between the design of prosthesis and CS (p = 0.312), flexion (p = 0.422), or external rotation (p = 0.776). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis showed that the healed groups could obtain better functional outcomes and ROM than the non-healed groups. In addition, fracture-dedicated prostheses promoted the healing rate of greater tuberosity. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020157276, PROSPERO: CRD42020157276.

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuff treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has shown satisfactory outcomes in rotator cuff-deficient shoulders, its performance in shoulders with an intact rotator cuff has not been fully elucidated. Shoulder osteoarthritis can present with alterations in glenoid morphology, which have contributed to inconsistent outcomes in anatomic shoulder replacement. The glenoid component is responsible for a predominance of these arthroplasty complications. Given these glenoid-related difficulties, RSA may provide a more favorable option. We aimed to summarize the current literature on rotator cuff intact osteoarthritis treated with primary RSA and to determine whether morphologic changes in the glenoid led to inferior outcomes.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using an inclusion criterion of primary RSA for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. The Modified Coleman Methodology Score was calculated to analyze reporting quality. Following appropriate exclusions, of the 1002 studies identified by the databases, 13 were selected.

RESULTS

Postoperative improvement in weighted means for Constant scores reached statistical significance (P = .02). The mean rate of major complications was 3.8%. A subset of 8 studies was created that detailed the following descriptions of altered glenoid morphology: "static posterior instability," "severe posterior subluxation," "posterior glenoid wear >20°," "significant posterior glenoid bone loss," "biconcave glenoid," "B2 glenoid," and "B/C glenoid." Within this subset, the mean complication rate was 4.7%, with 4 of the 7 studies having a rate ≤ 3%, and improvements in the Constant score (P = .002) and external rotation (P = .02) reached statistical significance.

DISCUSSION

RSA as treatment for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff provides optimal outcomes with low complication rates across a short term of follow up. Preoperative considerations for using reverse arthroplasty in the treatment of osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff include glenoid retroversion, posterior humeral subluxation, and glenoid bone loss. The attributes of reverse arthroplasty that contribute to favorable outcomes in arthritic shoulders include its semiconstrained design and robust glenoid fixation. Soft-tissue imbalances as a consequence of pathologic glenoid morphology and chronic humeral subluxation can be mitigated with the RSA semiconstrained design. Glenoid bone loss can be effectively managed with RSA's robust glenoid fixation, with and without the use of bone graft. The capability to lateralize the joint center of rotation may be valuable when faced with a medialized glenoid wear pattern. The current findings suggest that reverse arthroplasty can achieve highly favorable outcomes for glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff.

Hemiarthroplasty as a salvage treatment for failed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

The implantation rates of reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (RTSAs) are increasing worldwide, resulting in higher absolute numbers of the associated complications and revision surgeries. This requires the discussion of salvage therapies for failed RTSAs without revision to a new RTSA. Revision to hemiarthroplasty may offer a valid fallback option in certain cases. This study aimed to analyze the incidence, indications, and clinical outcomes, especially the reduction in pain levels compared to a matched control group.

Methods

Our prospectively enrolled patient cohort of RTSA implantations at a tertiary referral center between January 2005 and December 2018 was retrospectively queried for revision to a hemiarthroplasty. For clinical outcome evaluation, a minimum follow-up duration of 2 years after revision to hemiarthroplasty was required. Clinical outcome measures were compared to two matching groups, one with RTSA preserving revision and one without any reintervention. The outcome measures were the absolute and relative Constant-Murley score (aCS and rCS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), range of motion, and pain.

Results

A total of 21 out of 1237 RTSAs (1.7%) underwent salvage revision to hemiarthroplasty at a mean time of 20 ± 21 months (range, 1-75 months). Of those, 12 were available for a minimum follow-up of 2 years after revision to a hemiarthroplasty. The main indications were glenoid loosening (8/12), scapular spine fracture (2/12), and instability (2/21). Clinical outcome was analyzed at a mean follow-up period of 46 ± 26 months (24 months to 123 months) after revision to a hemiarthroplasty. The revision significantly reduced CS pain from 6 ± 4 points to 12 ± 3 points (scale 0 to 15 with 15 as optimum, P < .01). The aCS, rCS, SSV, and range of motion did not improve. Comparison with the RTSA preserving revision group and the RTSA group without reintervention showed significantly worse outcome scores for aCS (33 ± 10 vs. 55 ± 19 vs. 69 ± 12 points), rCS (41 ± 14% vs. 67 ± 20% vs. 84 ± 13%), SSV (35 ± 19% vs. 64 ± 20% vs. 81 ± 15%), flexion (53 ± 27° vs. 64 ± 20° vs. 128 ± 24°), and abduction (50 ± 23° vs. 109 ± 42° vs. 142 ± 24°). Pain was similar in all groups at the last follow-up visit.

Conclusion

In a few cases, RTSA retention or revision to another RTSA is impossible. For those patients, conversion to hemiarthroplasty is a valid fallback option to reduce the patient's pain levels and provide low-level function.

Cow-hitch fixation in fracture hemiarthroplasty

Background

The treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures with hemiarthroplasty is associated with a high failure rate due to secondary displacement of the tuberosities. It was the aim of this in-vitro study to compare the mechanical stability of tuberosity reattachment obtained with the so-called “Cow-Hitch” (CH) cerclage compared with conventional tuberosity reattachment.

Methods

A 4-part proximal humerus fracture was created in 10 fresh-frozen, human cadaveric shoulders. The greater and lesser tuberosity were reattached to the hemiarthroplasty stem with in total 4 CH Cerclages in the Cow-Hitch group. The conventional technique—recommended for the tested implant—was used in the control group using 6 sutures. A total of 5000 loading cycles with forces of 350N were applied, while motion (in mm) of the tuberosities was recorded in 3 directions (anteroposterior = AP, mediolateral = ML, inferosuperior = IS) with a telecentric camera.

Results

After 5000 loading cycles, the CH group showed less fragment displacement (AP: 2.3 ± 2.3 mm, ML: 1.8 ± 0.9 mm, IS: 1.3 ± 0.5 mm) than the conventional group (AP: 9.8 ± 12.3 mm, ML: 5.5 ± 5.6 mm, IS: 4.5 ± 4.7 mm). The differences were not statistically significant (AP: P = .241; ML: P = .159; IS: P = .216). The lesser tuberosity fragment displacement in the CH group after 5000 cycles was less in the AP (2.3 ± 3.3 vs. 4.0 ± 2.8, P = .359) and IS (1.9 ± 1.2 vs. 3.1 ± 1.8; P = .189) directions but higher in the ML direction (7.2 ± 5.7 vs 6.3 ± 3.6, P = .963).

Conclusions

In-vitro, “Cow-Hitch” cerclage results in mean greater tuberosity displacements of 2 mm and reliably prevents displacements greater than 5 mm. In contrast, the conventional fixation technique yields unreliable, variable stability with low to complete displacement upon cyclical loading.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty used for revision of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

Background

As reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) cases increase, so too will the need to revise subsequent failures. Many of the complications associated with revising anatomic total shoulder and hemiarthroplasty have been adequately addressed by RSA including glenoid bone deficiency, instability, and functional outcomes. However, the risk for complication when revising a failed reverse prosthesis may be more pronounced with increased bone and soft tissue deficiency. The ability for the reversed prosthesis to accommodate these insufficiencies following a prior reversed prosthesis is unclear.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were queried for articles which fit the inclusion criteria of a reversed prosthesis used to revise a failed primary reverse prosthesis with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and clinical outcome reporting.

Results

After exclusions, 9 studies reporting on 242 reverse shoulders with a mean follow-up of 40.29 months were analyzed. The differences between preoperative and postoperative weighted means were not significant for Constant (P = .26), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score (P = .61), SSV (P = .57), and visual analog scale for pain (P = .48). Functional improvements in elevation (74°-102°) and external rotation (18°-21°) were consistent with those reported for primary reverse procedures, although differences in preoperative and postoperative measures were not statistically significant. Patient satisfaction was 89% with a major complication rate of 25%.

Discussion

The reverse shoulder prosthesis has proven satisfactory in revising hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. The current results indicate RSA is also a satisfactory treatment option when revising a prior reverse prosthesis. Inherent to revision shoulder surgery is the obstacle of humeral and glenoid bone loss, an attenuated soft-tissue envelope, and instability. The reverse prosthesis may adequately address these commonly confronted difficulties with its inherent design characteristics. RSA provides a secure glenoid fixation for bone grafting, the ability to increase construct stability with component sizing, and a reliance on the deltoid for function. As our learning about revision of RSA improves, so will our ability to preemptively address potential issues which may lead to decreased complications in these cases. Despite the 25% rate of major complication, patients reported satisfaction of 89% which demonstrates the improvements in function and pain relief that are provided by the reverse prosthesis.

Outcomes of Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Patient-Specific, Evidence-Based Treatment Algorithms

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have identified risk factors for different types of treatment of proximal humeral fracture (PHF) and allowed the development of a patient-specific, evidence-based treatment algorithm with the potential of improving overall outcomes and reducing complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results and complications of treating PHF using this algorithmic approach.

METHODS

All patients with isolated PHF between 2014 and 2017 were included and prospectively followed. The initial treatment algorithm (Version 1 [V1]) based on patients' functional needs, bone quality, and type of fracture was refined after 2 years (Version 2 [V2]). Adherence to protocol, clinical outcomes, and complications were analyzed at a 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The study included 334 patients (mean age, 66 years; 68% female): 226 were treated nonoperatively; 65, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); 39, with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA); and 4, with hemiarthroplasty. At 1 year, the preinjury EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) values were regained (0.88 and 0.89, respectively) and the mean relative Constant Score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) (and standard deviation [SD]) were 96% ± 21% and 85% ± 16%. Overall complications and revision rates were 19% and 13%. Treatment conforming to the algorithm outperformed non-conforming treatment with respect to relative CS (97% versus 88%, p = 0.016), complication rates (16.3% versus 30.8%, p = 0.014), and revision rates (10.6% versus 26.9%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treating PHF using a patient-specific, evidence-based algorithm restored preinjury quality of life as measured with the EQ-5D and approximately 90% normal shoulders as measured with the relative CS and the SSV. Adherence to the treatment algorithm was associated with significantly better clinical outcomes and substantially reduced complication and revision rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Displaced three and four part proximal humeral fractures: prospective controlled randomized open-label two-arm study comparing intramedullary nailing and locking plate

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was (1) to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures using either IMN or LP (2) and to report complications related to each technique.

METHODS

A prospective controlled randomized open-label two-arm study was performed. Ninety-nine consecutive adult patients with a 3- and 4-part displaced acute proximal humeral fractures were randomized to be treated with IMN (n = 49) or LP (n = 50). Constant, ASES and SST scores were recorded by the surgeon. Range of motion was evaluated. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess shoulder pain. Complications and revision surgeries were reported.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were analyzed, nine were lost, and five died during the follow-up period. The mean age was 73.7 years (± 13.3,, and the mean follow-up was 66 months (± 13.5). At last follow-up, VAS was lower in the IMN group (0.9 (± 1.1) vs. 1.9 (± 1.7), p = 0.001). The median Constant score was significantly higher in the IMN group (81.6 (± 10.9) points) vs. in the LP group (75.6 (± 19.5) points) (p = 0.043), and ASES score was also significantly higher in the IMN group (86.3 (± 9.5) vs. 75.2 (± 19.6), p = 0.001). There was no difference in the range of motion or SST scores between the two groups. Complications were seen higher in the LP group (9 (21%) vs. 22 (52%), p = 0.003). Revision surgery was higher in the LP group (37% vs. 21%).

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory results were accomplished in both groups according to the reported clinical outcomes. Complication and revision rates were higher in LP group.

Prosthesis Designs and Tuberosity Fixation Techniques in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Influence on Tuberosity Healing in Proximal Humerus Fractures

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is increasingly used for the treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures and fracture sequelae. In 2021, half a dozen models of fracture stems are commercially available, reflecting its growing utility for fracture management. Prosthesis designs, bone grafting and tuberosity fixation techniques have evolved to allow better and more reliable fixation of tuberosities and bony ingrowth. Patients with anatomical tuberosity healing not only have an increased range of active anterior elevation and external rotation, but also experience fewer complications and longer prosthesis survival. This review provides an overview of recent evidence on basic and fracture-specific RTSA design features as well as tuberosity fixation techniques that can influence tuberosity healing.

Acute versus delayed reverse total shoulder Arthroplasty for the management of Proximal Humerus Fractures

OBJECTIVES

Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are common, yet their optimal management remains debated. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is an increasingly popular option, particularly for non-reconstructible or osteoporotic fractures. Despite this trend, current literature provides limited guidance with regards to surgical timing and patient selection for rTSA. A trial of non-operative management might be beneficial for many patients who are not clearly indicated for surgery, provided this does not have a major negative impact on results for those who ultimately require rTSA. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether delayed reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture (>28 days from injury) is associated with any difference in complication rates or functional outcomes relative to acute surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 114 consecutive patients who underwent rTSA as the primary management of a PHF at two Level 1 trauma centers and one academic community hospital between 2004 and 2016.

INTERVENTION

rTSA as primary management of proximal humerus fracture MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complications, range of motion, and patient-reported functional outcomes scores (DASH, PROMIS physical function, and EQ-5D) RESULTS: Eighty-two of 114 patients (72%) underwent early surgery. Complex (4-part, head-split, dislocated) fractures were significantly more common in the acutely treated group. There was no significant difference in complications. Overall complication rate was 11.4%. There was a significant difference in DASH score favoring early surgery, with an average score of 22.4 in acutely treated patients versus 35.1 in delayed patients (p = 0.034). There was a non-statistically significant trend towards better PROMIS physical function scores and ROM in the acutely treated group.

CONCLUSION

Delay in performing primary rTSA for management of PHF does not lead to an increase in complication rates but it may come at the cost of worse functional outcomes in patients who ultimately require rTSA.

Additively manufactured patient-specific prosthesis for tumor reconstruction: Design, process, and properties

Design and processing capabilities of additive manufacturing (AM) to fabricate complex geometries continues to drive the adoption of AM for biomedical applications. In this study, a validated design methodology is presented to evaluate AM as an effective fabrication technique for reconstruction of large bone defects after tumor resection in pediatric oncology patients. Implanting off-the-shelf components in pediatric patients is especially challenging because most standard components are sized and shaped for more common adult cases. While currently reported efforts on AM implants are focused on maxillofacial, hip and knee reconstructions, there have been no reported studies on reconstruction of proximal humerus tumors. A case study of a 9-year-old diagnosed with proximal humerus osteosarcoma was used to develop a patient-specific AM prosthesis for the humerus following tumor resection. Commonly used body-centered cubic (BCC) structures were incorporated at the surgical neck and distal interface in order to increase the effective surface area, promote osseointegration, and reduce the implant weight. A patient-specific prosthesis was fabricated using electron beam melting method from biocompatible Ti-6Al-4V. Both computational and biomechanical tests were performed on the prosthesis to evaluate its biomechanical behavior under varying loading conditions. Morphological analysis of the construct using micro-computed tomography was used to compare the as-designed and as-built prosthesis. It was found that the patient-specific prosthesis could withstand physiologically-relevant loading conditions with minimal permanent deformation (82 μm after 105 cycles) at the medial aspect of the porous surgical neck. These outcomes support potential translation of the patient-specific AM prostheses to reconstruct large bone defects following tumor resection.

Does preoperative diagnosis impact patient outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) have expanded to include the treatment of a wide variety of shoulder pathologies, and there may be significant differences in patient outcomes based on preoperative diagnosis.

METHODS

A systematic review of the orthopedic literature contained in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was performed on November 14, 2019. Studies investigating rTSA indicated for 7 distinct preoperative diagnoses (massive rotator cuff tear [MCT] without glenohumeral osteoarthritis [GHOA], MCT with GHOA or cuff tear arthropathy, primary GHOA, inflammatory arthritis with MCT, failed shoulder arthroplasty, proximal humeral fracture [PHF], and sequelae following PHF) were included. The main outcomes of interest included functional outcomes (abduction, external rotation, and forward flexion) and patient-reported outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score and Constant-Murley score). Because of significant variation in measurement and reporting, data on internal rotation were not extracted. In addition, radiographic outcomes and complication rates were extracted and recorded for each of the included studies.

RESULTS

In total, 47 studies, comprising 2280 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Significant improvements in functional outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures were found across the preoperative diagnostic groups. There were no significant differences between the diagnostic groups regarding improvement between preoperative and postoperative values for the outcomes of interest, with the exception that the inflammatory arthropathy group had significantly less improvement in the Constant-Murley score than the primary GHOA and revision arthroplasty groups. Although there were few differences in improvement between groups, there were significant differences regarding the level of postoperative functional performance, which was not as consistent in the context of trauma or revision operations (ie, complex PHF, fracture sequela, and revision arthroplasty groups).

CONCLUSION

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty can provide reliable improvement in clinical outcomes regardless of preoperative diagnosis, with few differences across diagnostic groups regarding preoperative to postoperative improvement. The groups with primary GHOA and MCTs with or without GHOA demonstrated the most reliable postoperative functional outcomes of the examined diagnostic groups. Postoperative outcomes were not as consistent in the context of trauma or revision operations, and these groups may benefit from a variety of modern advancements in rTSA, although further research into these modalities for these groups is needed. Finally, rTSA remains an important treatment option in the context of rheumatoid arthritis, with similar outcomes and complication rates compared with the 6 other operative indications.