Classification of instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty guides surgical management and outcomes

Managing rotator cuff tear arthropathy: a role for cuff tear arthropathy hemiarthroplasty as well as reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Disabling cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) is commonly managed with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). However, for patients with CTA having preserved active elevation, cuff tear arthropathy hemiarthroplasty (CTAH) may offer a cost-effective alternative that avoids the complications unique to RSA. We sought to determine the characteristics and outcomes of a series of patients with CTA managed with these procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 103 patients with CTA treated with shoulder arthroplasty, the type of which was determined by the patient's ability to actively elevate the arm. Outcome measures included the change in the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the percent maximum improvement in SST (%MPI), and the percentage of patients exceeding the minimal clinically important difference for the change in SST and %MPI. Postoperative x-rays were evaluated to assess the positions of the center of rotation and the greater tuberosity for each implant.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent of the 103 patients were managed with CTAH while 56% were managed with RSA. Both arthroplasties resulted in clinically significant improvement. Patients having RSA improved from a mean preoperative SST score of 1.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.0-3.0) to a postoperative score of 6.3 (IQR, 2.3-10.0) (P < .01). Patients having CTAH improved from a preoperative SST score of 3.1 (IQR, 1.0-4.0) to a postoperative score of 7.6 (IQR, 5.0-10.) (P < .001). These improvements exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. Instability accounted for most of the RSA complications; however, it did not account for any CTAH complications. The postoperative position of the center of rotation and greater tuberosity on anteroposterior radiographs did not correlate with the clinical outcomes for either procedure.

CONCLUSION

For 103 patients with CTA, clinically significant improvement was achieved with appropriately indicated CTAH and RSA. In view of the lower cost of the CTAH implant, it may provide a cost-effective alternative to RSA for patients with retained active elevation.

Custom-made Glenoid Baseplate and Intra-Operative Navigation in Complex Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report

Prosthetic instability is one of the most challenging complications to manage when considering reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Additional tools are available to improve accuracy in planning and execution of arthroplasties, such as 3-dimensional (3D) virtual planning based on computer tomography (CT) scan and intra-operative navigation. We report a case of an 84-year-old male treated for RSA prosthetic instability combined with severe glenoid deformity and bone loss, and subclinical periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The definitive surgery consisted in implanting a customized metaglene component realized on the basis of the bone defect detected in the 3D-CT scan and implanted with the aid of computer-assisted intra-operative navigation. The patient was periodically followed-up for a year with clinical and radiological evaluations with the absence of further prosthetic dislocations nor PJI, a good overall satisfaction, a satisfying range of motion, and acceptable functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score 62, Constant-Murley Score 36). This is the first description, to our knowledge, of a customized glenoid baseplate implanted with the aid of intraoperative navigation. The combined use of 3D-CT planning and intra-operative computer-assisted navigation allows to manage complex cases of prosthetic revision surgery even where extensive bone defects are present.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear After Radial to Axillary End-to-Side Transfer: A Case Report

CASE

A 60-year-old man sustained a massive irreparable rotator cuff tear and axillary nerve palsy with deltoid dysfunction after an anterior shoulder dislocation. He underwent staged reverse end-to-side radial-to-axillary nerve transfer with return of deltoid function allowing for subsequent reverse shoulder arthroplasty. At 1 year postoperatively, he returned to full activity.

CONCLUSION

Irreparable rotator cuff tears complicated by axillary nerve palsy can be effectively treated with a staged approach of nerve transfer followed by reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Predictors of dislocations after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a study by the ASES complications of RSA multicenter research group

BACKGROUND

Instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is one of the most frequent complications and remains a clinical challenge. Current evidence is limited by small sample size, single-center, or single-implant methodologies that limit generalizability. We sought to determine the incidence and patient-related risk factors for dislocation after RSA, using a large, multicenter cohort with varying implants.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter study was performed involving 15 institutions and 24 American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons members across the United States. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients undergoing primary or revision RSA between January 2013 and June 2019 with minimum 3-month follow-up. All definitions, inclusion criteria, and collected variables were determined using the Delphi method, an iterative survey process involving all primary investigators requiring at least 75% consensus to be considered a final component of the methodology for each study element. Dislocations were defined as complete loss of articulation between the humeral component and the glenosphere and required radiographic confirmation. Binary logistic regression was performed to determine patient predictors of postoperative dislocation after RSA.

RESULTS

We identified 6621 patients who met inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up of 19.4 months (range: 3-84 months). The study population was 40% male with an average age of 71.0 years (range: 23-101 years). The rate of dislocation was 2.1% (n = 138) for the whole cohort, 1.6% (n = 99) for primary RSAs, and 6.5% (n = 39) for revision RSAs (P < .001). Dislocations occurred at a median of 7.0 weeks (interquartile range: 3.0-36.0 weeks) after surgery with 23.0% (n = 32) after a trauma. Patients with a primary diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff had an overall lower rate of dislocation than patients with other diagnoses (0.8% vs. 2.5%; P < .001). Patient-related factors independently predictive of dislocation, in order of the magnitude of effect, were a history of postoperative subluxations before radiographically confirmed dislocation (odds ratio [OR]: 19.52, P < .001), primary diagnosis of fracture nonunion (OR: 6.53, P < .001), revision arthroplasty (OR: 5.61, P < .001), primary diagnosis of rotator cuff disease (OR: 2.64, P < .001), male sex (OR: 2.21, P < .001), and no subscapularis repair at surgery (OR: 1.95, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

The strongest patient-related factors associated with dislocation were a history of postoperative subluxations and having a primary diagnosis of fracture nonunion. Notably, RSAs for osteoarthritis showed lower rates of dislocations than RSAs for rotator cuff disease. These data can be used to optimize patient counseling before RSA, particularly in male patients undergoing revision RSA.

Dual-Plate Fixation for Proximal Humerus Fractures With Unstable Medial Column in Patients With Osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

To compare radiological and clinical outcomes between lateral locking plate (LLP) and dual-plate fixation (LLP and additional medial buttress plate) for proximal humerus fractures with medial column comminution and varus deformity in patients with osteoporosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Overall, 52 patients were enrolled. Of these, 26 patients underwent dual-plate fixation. The control group (LLP) was matched to the dual-plate group for age, sex, injured side, and fracture type.

INTERVENTION

Patients in the dual-plate group were treated with LLP and medial buttress plate, whereas patients in the LLP group were treated with only an LLP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Demographic factors, operative time, and level of hemoglobin of the 2 groups obtained from medical records. Changes in the neck-shaft angle and the development of postoperative complications were recorded. Clinical outcomes were measured based on the visual analog scale; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; and Constant-Murley scores.

RESULTS

The operation time and hemoglobin loss did not differ significantly between the groups. Radiographic evaluation showed a significantly lower change in neck-shaft angle in the dual-=plate group than in the LLP group. The dual-plate group also showed better Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; and Constant-Murley scores than the LLP group.

CONCLUSION

Fixation using additional medial buttress plate with LLP may be considered for treating proximal humerus fractures in patients with an unstable medial column, varus deformity, and osteoporosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

How common is nerve injury after reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Nerve injury following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a known risk factor with wide ranging incidences reported. This systematic review evaluates the overall incidence of nerve injury following primary and revision RSA and summarizes the characteristics of the nerve injuries reported in the current literature.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using separate database searches (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane) following the PRISMA guidelines. Search criteria included the title terms "reverse shoulder," "reverse total shoulder," "inverted shoulder," and "inverted total shoulder" with publication dates ranging from 01/01/2010 to 01/01/2022. Studies that reported neurological injuries and complications were included and evaluated for primary RSA, revision RSA, number of nerve injuries, and which nerves were affected.

RESULTS

After exclusion, our systematic review consisted of 188 articles. A total of 40,146 patients were included, with 65% female. The weighted mean age was 70.3 years. The weighted mean follow-up was 35.4 months. The rate of nerve injury after RSA was 1.3% (510 of 40,146 RSAs). The rate of injury was greater in revision RSA compared to primary RSA (2.4% vs. 1.3%). Nerve injury was most common in RSAs done for a primary diagnosis of acute proximal humerus fracture (4.0%), followed by cuff tear arthropathy (3.0%), DJD (2.6%), and inflammatory arthritis (1.7%). Massive rotator cuff tears and post-traumatic arthritis cases had the lowest nerve injury rates (1.0% and 1.4%, respectively). The axillary nerve was the most commonly reported nerve that was injured in both primary and revision RSA (0.6%), followed by the ulnar nerve (0.26%) and median nerve (0.23%). Brachial plexus injury was reported in 0.19% of overall RSA cases.

CONCLUSION

Based on current English literature, nerve injuries occur at a rate of 1.3% after primary RSA compared with 2.4% after revision RSA. The most common nerve injury was to the axillary nerve (0.64%), with the most common operative diagnosis associated with nerve injury after RSA being acute proximal humerus fracture (4.0%). Surgeons should carefully counsel patients prior to surgery regarding the risk of nerve injury.

[Revision surgery in reverse shoulder arthroplasty : Management of the most common complications]

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the number of reverse shoulder arthroplasty implantations has increased continuously and a higher number of revision surgeries due to complications can be expected in the future. Current data show a mean complication rate for RSA of around 4%. The most common complications are instability, infection, component loosening, and periprosthetic fracture.

TREATMENT OPTIONS

Revision surgery for RSA is challenging, and an individual treatment plan is necessary. For prosthetic instability, different operative or non-operative treatment options are available. Revision surgery for periprosthetic infection with replacement of the prosthesis is usually necessary for infection management. The treatment of periprosthetic fractures is based on techniques of general fracture treatment and depends on the fracture type. Knowledge of complications and risk factors may decrease complication rates in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the future.

Drivers of inpatient hospitalization costs, joint-specific patient-reported outcomes, and health-related quality of life in shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy

BACKGROUND

Cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) can be successfully treated with various types of shoulder arthroplasty. While reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly used to treat CTA, CTA hemiarthroplasty (CTA-H, hemiarthroplasty with an extended humeral articular surface) can also be effective in patients with preserved glenohumeral elevation and an intact coracoacromial (CA) arch. As the value of arthroplasty is being increasingly scrutinized, cost containment has become a priority. The objective of this study was to assess hospitalization costs and improvements in joint-specific measures and health-related quality of life for these two types of shoulder arthroplasty in the management of CTA.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients (39 CTA-H and 33 RSA) were treated during the study time period using different selection criteria for each of the two procedures: CTA-H was selected in patients with retained active elevation, an intact CA arch, and an intact subscapularis, while RSA was selected in patients with pseudoparalysis or glenohumeral instability. The Simple Shoulder Test (SST) was used as a joint-specific patient-reported outcome measure. Improvement in quality-adjusted life years was measured using the Short Form 36. Costs associated with inpatient care were collected from hospital financial records. Univariate and multivariate analyses focused on determining predictors of hospitalization costs and improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in SST and Short Form 36 physical component scores were seen in both groups. Inpatient hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the RSA group than that in the CTA-H group ($15,074 ± $1614 vs. $10,389 ± $1948, P < .001), driven primarily by supplies including the cost of the prosthesis ($9005 ± $2521 vs. $4715 ± $2091, P < .001). The diagnosis of diabetes was an independent predictor of higher inpatient hospitalization costs for both groups. There were no independent predictors for quality-adjusted life year improvements. SST improvement in the CTA-H group was significantly higher in patients with lower preoperative SST scores.

CONCLUSION

Using a standard algorithm of CTA-H for shoulders with retained active elevation and an intact CA arch and RSA for poor active elevation or glenohumeral instability, both procedures led to significant improvements in health-related quality of life and joint-specific measures. Costs were significantly lower for patients meeting the selection criteria for CTA-H. Further value analytics are needed to compare the relative cost effectiveness of RSA and CTA-H for patients with CTA having retained active elevation, intact CA arch, and intact subscapularis.

Risk factors of instability following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with no history of shoulder surgery

Introduction

As its indications expand, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) utilization continues to increase. Though relatively uncommon, instability following rTSA can be associated with significant morbidity and need for subsequent revision and treatment. This case control study aims to characterize factors leading to instability after rTSA, especially in those with no previous shoulder surgery.

Methods

194 rTSAs performed within the study period with appropriate operative indications and follow-up were included. Risk factors used in analysis included age, gender, BMI, ASA class, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), glenosphere, tray, and liner size. Data was analyzed using a hierarchical binary logistical regression to create a predictive model for instability.

Results

Seven patients sustained a post-operative dislocation. Mean time to dislocation was 60.4 weeks. Five required open reduction with placement of either a larger humeral tray or polyethylene spacer. One required open reduction with osteophyte removal, and one was converted to a resection arthroplasty. Dislocators were more likely to have a larger BMI (p = 0.002), higher ASA classification (p = 0.09), and larger liner size (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a large series of patients successfully treated with rTSA. Dislocations were an uncommon complication, but were clearly associated with higher patient BMI, ASA classification, and increased liner size.

Complication and revision rates after reverse total shoulder revision from hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review

Background

Thus, the purpose of the present study was to (1) characterize common postoperative complications and (2) quantify the rates of revision in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty revisional surgery. We hypothesize that hardware loosenings will be the most common complication to occur in the sample, with the humeral component being the most common loosening.

Methods

This systematic review adhered to PRISMA reporting guideline. For our inclusion criteria, we included any study that contained intraoperative and/or postoperative complication data, and revision rates on patients who had undergone revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to a failed hemiarthroplasty. Complications include neurologic injury, deep surgical site infections, hardware loosening/prosthetic instability, and postoperative fractures (acromion, glenoid, and humeral fractures).

Results

The study contained 22 studies that assessed complications from shoulders that had revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from a hemiarthroplasty, with a total sample of 925 shoulders. We found that the most common complication to occur was hardware loosenings (5.3%), and of the hardware loosenings, humeral loosenings (3.8%) were the most common. The revision rate was found to be 10.7%.

Conclusion

This systematic review found that revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed hemiarthroplasty has a high overall complication and reintervention rates, specifically for hardware loosening and revision rates.

[Cuff Arthropathy - Inverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (iSTEP) - Biomechanical Principles, Complications and Outcomes]

The inverse total shoulder prosthesis is a standard treatment for cuff arthropathy. The number of implanted inverse total shoulder prostheses in Germany is significantly higher than that of the anatomical total shoulder prosthesis. Kaplan-Meier analyses show a 10-year result of inverse total shoulder prostheses after cuff arthropathy of 90%. The extent of the scapular notching correlates with the functional clinical outcome. The humeral anchoring principles of inverse total shoulder prosthesis differ considerably (from purely epiphyseal to diaphyseal). Inverse total shoulder prostheses show significant differences in humeral and glenoid offset as well as in shaft-neck angles. The large number of systems available differ considerably concerning anatomical and biomechanical parameters - the surgeons must be trained accordingly. Still, most shoulder replacements are implanted by surgeons who rarely perform this procedure.

Outcomes of instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: reoperation and persistent instability are common

HYPOTHESIS

Although risk factors for instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been extensively studied, the outcomes of patients who experience instability are unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes in patients with instability after RSA.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with instability after RSA with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up from an institutional database. Baseline data were recorded, and all patients we contacted to obtain clinical outcome scores. Patients who required revision surgery and those treated successfully with closed reduction were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included. Of these patients, 40 (80%) required revision surgery whereas 10 (20%) were treated successfully with closed reduction. At an average follow-up of 63.7 months (range, 24-123 months), outcome scores did not differ between groups. Patients who required revision surgery were more likely to have undergone previous shoulder surgery, prior to their index arthroplasty (P = .031). Seventeen patients (42.5%) reported recurrent instability following revision surgery, and 14 (35.0%) required additional revision surgery. Ultimately, stability was never achieved in 7 of 50 patients (14%) after their index instability event.

CONCLUSION

Although instability after RSA can commonly be corrected with reasonable functional results, multiple procedures may be needed and some patients may experience persistent instability.

Acromiohumeral cerclage in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for recurrent instability

BACKGROUND

Recurrent shoulder instability after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) presents a challenging clinical problem. A handful of cases have been reported describing stability achieved only after revision rTSA with cerclage augmentation. We describe an acromiohumeral cerclage technique, where the humeral component is fixed with a nonabsorbable, high-tensile suture tape looped through transosseous acromial drill tunnels as an augment to salvage shoulder stability.

METHODS

All patients treated with acromiohumeral cerclage in rTSA for instability between November 1, 2015, and February 1, 2020, with minimum 1-year follow-up were included. Demographic information, baseline preoperative and postoperative range of motion at most recent follow-up, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder scores, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

Ten patients, 4 female and 6 male, aged 64.3 ± 7.4 years (range, 53-77 years) with the mean postoperative follow-up of 23 months were included; 90% underwent surgery on the dominant side. Patients underwent an average of 2.1 ± 1.9 prior revisions (range, 0-7), over an average of 10.4 months (range, 0-72 months), before revision with suture cerclage augmentation was performed. All patients either had significant past shoulder history at other institutions and/or comorbidities that added significant complexity to their cases, with an average of 0.6 ± 0.9 (range, 0-3) prior other shoulder operations performed before their initial rTSA. The average decrease in VAS score among the 10 patients was 4.3 ± 2.7 (P < .05), ranging from 0 to 8 points. The average increase in ASES score was 51.3 ± 21 (P < .05), ranging from 13.3 to 69.9 points. The average increase in active forward elevation for 8 patients was 79° ± 39° (P = .0008), ranging from 40° to 160°. All patients have remained stable with well-positioned prostheses since their final operations with no recurrent dislocations or acromial complications. Two patients unable to travel for an office visit were contacted via phone and answered questions to obtain postoperative ASES and VAS scores.

CONCLUSION

Acromiohumeral cerclage suture augmentation in revision rTSA may be a useful, simple surgical strategy to employ with other revision and augmentation techniques to treat cases of recurrent, chronic instability, particularly in the setting of multiple revisions.

Dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using contemporary medialized modular systems. Can we still consider it such a frequent complication?

INTRODUCTION

Improvement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) prosthesis and technique has reduced the initially high complication and revision rates associated with this implant. However, instability continues to be a leading cause of reoperation after RTSA, being related in previous studies with medialized designs. The aim of this study was to determine the dislocation rate with the employment of two medialized modular systems of RTSA in our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of two different modular systems of RTSA (SMR Modular Shoulder System and Delta XTEND Reverse Shoulder) was performed between 2009 and 2017 with a minimum 3-year follow-up. Baseline demographic, clinical (Constant, ASES and ROM), and radiographic data were collected. Characteristics of postoperative instability cases were also evaluated.

RESULTS

237 primary RTSA (41% SMR/59% Delta) and 34 revision RTSA (44% SMR/56% Delta) with a mean follow-up of 75.6 ± 5.2 months (79.2 SMR/86.3 Delta, p = .586) were included in the present study. Indications for primary RTSA were osteoarthritis, rotator cuff tear arthropathy and massive irreparable rotator cuff tear (64%), acute fracture (32%), and fracture sequelae (4%). Subscapularis tendon was always repaired in degenerative pathology and tuberosities reattached in traumatic cases. The mean age of the global series was 76.5 ± 5.3 years (75.8 SMR/78.6 Delta, p = .104) with a mean Constant/ASES score at final follow-up of 68.5 ± 4.3/72.9 ± 20.3 (71/68 SMR and 69/74 Delta, p = .653 and .642). Only 2 patients (one acute fracture and one fracture sequelae) suffered an early postoperative anterior dislocation (before 3 months) which represents a rate of .84% in primary cases and .73% including revision surgery. Closed reduction manoeuvres were not successful, and both patients required revision surgery. At the end follow-up, both were stable and had no further dislocations.

CONCLUSION

The dislocation rate after RTSA with the employment of two contemporary modular systems with a medialized centre of rotation is extremely low, especially when compared with the previously published series with the original Grammont design. Acute fracture and fracture sequelae were the main diagnoses associated with this instability. The reasons for the low dislocation rate are multifactorial, but the improvement in the baseplate position according to the more recent standards of "ideal position" and technical aspects such as subscapularis repair or tuberosity reattachment in fractures probably play an important role in this aspect.

The relationship between glenoid inclination and instability following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Despite advances in implant design and surgical technique, instability remains the most common early complication and reason for early revision after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the glenoid implant inclination, as measured by the β-angle, as an independent risk factor for instability after primary RSA.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted matching cases with instability after primary RSA using a single implant to controls without instability. Controls were matched to age, sex, body mass index, and baseplate type (1:3 ratio of cases to controls). The preoperative, postoperative, and the change in pre- to postoperative glenoid inclination (β-angle) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-four cases (mean age, 66.2 years) were matched to 102 controls (mean age, 67.0 years). There was a wide range of postoperative (63° to 100°) and pre- to postoperative change (-16.5° to +30.5°) in β-angles collectively. There was no significant difference in the postoperative β-angle (mean, 80.8° vs. 82.7°, P = .19) or the change in β-angle (mean, +1.7° vs. +3.4°, P = .35) between cases and controls, respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated no increased odds of instability with the postoperative β-angle, odds ratio 0.965 (confidence interval [CI] = 0.916-1.02, P = .19). Likewise, for the preoperative to postoperative change in β-angle, there was no significantly increased odds of instability, odds ratio 0.978 (CI = 0.934-1.03, P = .35). Finally, there was no difference in risk of instability in patients whose implant positioning resulted in a net superior increase in inclination, relative risk 0.85 (95% CI = 0.46-1.56, P = .28).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither the final prosthetic glenoid inclination nor the change in glenoid inclination, as measured by the β-angle, significantly influences the risk of prosthetic instability after primary RSA.

The modern use of the extended humeral head (cuff tear arthropathy) hemiarthroplasty

Today, the treatment of osteoarthritis in the rotator cuff–deficient population is largely dominated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Despite the popularity of and increased familiarity with this procedure, the complication rate of RSA remains significant. An extended humeral head hemiarthroplasty may provide a less invasive alternative for select patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) and preserved glenohumeral active elevation. With the indications for reverse arthroplasty expanding to younger patients, there are concerns about the longevity of this implant, as well as the associated revision burden. In the setting of failed RSA, the bone stock available for glenosphere baseplate fixation can be inadequate for reimplantation. The treatment strategies for complex shoulder deformities and failed RSA are limited by patient-specific issues, such as anatomy and risk factors. In this review, we discuss the potential role of extended humeral head hemiarthroplasty (CTA hemiarthroplasty) as a primary surgical option in select patients (1) who have preserved elevation > 90°, (2) who have maintained stability (intact coracoacromial ligament), and (3) who desire to circumvent the complications associated with RSA. Furthermore, CTA hemiarthroplasty may be used for severe glenoid erosion, for a fragmented acromion, and in the revision setting for failed RSA aimed at a reliable salvage procedure.

The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II

Background

Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this study was to provide a focused, updated systematic review for each of the most common complications of RSA by limiting each search to publications after 2010. In this part II, the following were examined: (1) instability, (2) humerus/glenoid fracture, (3) acromial/scapular spine fractures (AF/SSF), and (4) problems/miscellaneous.

Methods

Four separate PubMed database searches were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Overall, 137 studies for instability, 94 for humerus/glenoid fracture, 120 for AF/SSF, and 74 for problems/miscellaneous were included in each review, respectively. Univariate analysis was performed with chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

Results

The Grammont design had a higher instability rate vs. all other designs combined (4.0%, 1.3%; P < .001), and the onlay humerus design had a lower rate than the lateralized glenoid design (0.9%, 2.0%; P = .02). The rate for intraoperative humerus fracture was 1.8%; intraoperative glenoid fracture, 0.3%; postoperative humerus fracture, 1.2%; and postoperative glenoid fracture, 0.1%. The rate of AF/SSF was 2.6% (371/14235). The rate for complex regional pain syndrome was 0.4%; deltoid injury, 0.1%; hematoma, 0.3%; and heterotopic ossification, 0.8%.

Conclusions

Focused systematic reviews of recent literature with a large volume of shoulders demonstrate that using non-Grammont modern prosthesis designs, complications including instability, intraoperative humerus and glenoid fractures, and hematoma are significantly reduced compared with previous studies. As the indications continue to expand for RSA, it is imperative to accurately track the rate and types of complications in order to justify its cost and increased indications.

Surgical treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a matched-pair analysis of angular-stable plating vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

To date, there is a lack of consensus regarding the type of surgical treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) in elderly patients, especially between joint preservation and joint replacement techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We matched 60 patients (aged 73.2 ± 6.4 years) with complex PHFs in terms of sex, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, who underwent locking-plate open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) (2011-2017). Postoperative range of motion and functional outcome were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, Oxford Shoulder Score, Constant-Murley score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score at a mean follow-up of 49 months (ORIF group) and 38 months (RSA group). Complications and unplanned revision surgery were recorded, and all radiographs were analyzed.

RESULTS

ORIF resulted in numerically, although not statistically significantly, greater mean shoulder motion vs. RSA. Significantly better outcome was reported for the Oxford Shoulder Score (P = .034) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (P = .026) in the ORIF group, although no significant differences were observed in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score and Constant-Murley score. The complication rate (30% vs. 10%) and revision rate (20% vs. 3%) were significantly higher in the ORIF group (P = .028), with patients who had complications or required revision having worse functional results.

CONCLUSION

Favorable results are achievable through both angular-stable plating and RSA. Although ORIF may be associated with a superior functional outcome, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference, RSA was linked to significantly fewer complications and revisions.

Failed Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty and Recommendations for Revision

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The most common complications warranting revision consideration in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) include instability and its associated causes: infection, periprosthetic fracture, and glenoid baseplate loosening. Management of complications can be challenging and the nuances of treatment are still being elucidated. The focus of this paper is to review the treatment of the failed RSA and discuss evidence-based recommendations for revision.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most common complications requiring revision RSA are instability and infection. The causes for instability can be subdivided into three main subcategories: loss of compression, loss of containment, and impingement. Loss of compression is further broken down into 6 subcategories revolving around abnormal prosthesis positioning, undersized prostheses, or intrinsic soft-tissue tension loss leading to instability. Periprosthetic infection can also lead to instability, yet the most appropriate management for infected RSA remains controversial. Restoring stability by maximizing deltoid and soft tissue tension while avoiding impingement revolves around three basic methods: (1) lateralizing and/or upsizing the glenosphere to an inferior position on the glenoid, (2) use of a more constrained polyethylene insert, and (3) distalizing the humerus by increasing the polyethylene thickness and/or the thickness of the humeral tray. Management of periprosthetic joint infection can be performed in one-stage, two-stage, or "three-stage" procedures all showing good outcomes with two-stage procedures being the most commonly performed. However, persistent positive culture with propriobacterium acnes can occur in up to 25% of cases. In order to limit the associated morbidity from failed revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty, continued research on best management of associated complications is warranted.

Clinical outcomes and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty used for failed prior shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is frequently performed in the revision setting as a salvage procedure. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical outcomes and complication, reoperation, and revision rates after revision RSA (RRSA) stratified according to the primary shoulder procedure undergoing revision.

Methods

Four databases (Embase, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) were searched for eligible studies published between January 1985 and September 2017. The primary outcomes of interest included pain, active range of motion, and functional outcome scores. Secondary outcomes included complication, reoperation, and revision rates.

Results

A total of 43 studies (1041 shoulder arthroplasties) met the inclusion criteria, with a mean follow-up period of 43.8 months (range, 31.1-57.2 months). Pain scores improved in all groups; however, none reached statistical significance. Range of motion improved in all groups, except for external rotation in the RSA category. RRSA demonstrated significant improvements in the Simple Shoulder Test score and Constant score (CS) in the group undergoing hemiarthroplasty (HA) for fracture, CS in the group undergoing HA for other indications, and CS in the group undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Pooled complication rates were highest in the failed RSA group (56.2%), followed by the group undergoing HA for other indications (27.7%), total shoulder arthroplasty group (23.6%), soft-tissue repair group (20.6%), open reduction and internal fixation group (19.0%), and group undergoing HA for fracture (13.6%).

Conclusions

Compared with other revision indications, RRSA for failed HA demonstrated the most favorable outcomes, whereas the highest complication and revision rates were observed in the RSA subgroup. This information is useful when establishing patient expectations regarding the risks, benefits, and complication and revision rates of RRSA.

Complications after surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly-an analysis of complication patterns and risk factors for reverse shoulder arthroplasty and angular-stable plating

BACKGROUND

To date, there is a lack of consensus regarding surgical treatment recommendations for complex proximal humerus fracture (PHF) patterns, especially between joint preservation and joint replacement techniques.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2017, 146 patients (aged 74.1 ± 8.0 years) with complex PHF were treated with locking plates (open reduction-internal fixation [ORIF]) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Complications and unplanned revision surgery were recorded in a mid-term follow-up. Potential patient and surgical risk factors for complications were extracted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Follow-up data were available for 125 patients, 66 (52.8%) of whom were treated with locking plates, and 59 (41.2%) with RTSA. Both groups had comparable Charlson indices. The overall complication rate was 37.8% for ORIF and 22.0% for RTSA, with a revision rate of 12.1% and 5.1%, respectively, as driven primarily by persistent motion deficits. Multivariate analyses demonstrated no significant differences between the 2 procedures (P = .500). However, age was an independent protective factor against overall complications (P = .018). Risk factors for major complications in ORIF included osteoporosis, varus impaction fractures, posteromedial metaphyseal extensions <8 mm, head-shaft displacements >4 mm, and multifragmentary greater tuberosities. For RTSA, higher complication rates were seen in patients with higher Charlson indices, diabetes, or altered (greater) tuberosities. In contrast, Neer's classification system was not predictive in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

RTSA led to fewer complications than ORIF and thus can be considered a valuable option in complex PHF of the elderly. Paying attention to specific prognostic factors may help to reduce the complication rate.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of the extended humeral head arthroplasty for selected patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy

BACKGROUND

Cuff tear arthropathy is commonly managed with a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). A humeral hemiarthroplasty with an extended humeral head may provide a less invasive alternative for selected patients with cuff tear arthropathy if the shoulder has preserved active elevation. Because evidence regarding this procedure is limited, we investigated its safety and efficacy in treating selected patients with cuff tear arthropathy.

METHODS

We analyzed the preoperative characteristics, surgical findings, and clinical outcomes for patients selected for extended head hemiarthroplasty.

RESULTS

For 42 patients with 2-year follow-up, there were no complications or revisions. The Simple Shoulder Test score improved from a median of 3.0 to 8.0 (P < .001). The median percentage of maximal possible improvement was 50% (P < .001). The percentage of patients able to perform each of the functions of the Simple Shoulder Test was significantly improved; for example, the ability to sleep comfortably increased from 19% to 71%, and the ability to place a coin on the shelf at shoulder level increased from 38% to 86% (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

There are circumstances in which RTSA is clearly the preferred procedure for cuff tear arthropathy, including pseudoparalysis, anterosuperior escape, and glenohumeral instability; however, in shoulders with preserved active motion and stability of the humeral head provided by an intact coracoacromial arch, the extended head humeral arthroplasty can enable selected patients to realize improved comfort and function without the potential risks of RTSA. Extended humeral head hemiarthroplasty can provide a safe and effective alternative for the management of selected patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy and preserved active motion.