Bone marrow stimulation decreases retear rates after primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Evolution of Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: Current Trends and Future Perspectives

Arthroscopic shoulder surgery has undergone significant advancements over the past decades, transitioning from a primarily diagnostic tool to a comprehensive therapeutic approach. Technological innovations and refined surgical techniques have expanded the indications for arthroscopy, allowing minimally invasive management of shoulder instability and rotator cuff pathology. Methods: This narrative review explores the historical evolution, current trends, and future perspectives in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Results: Key advancements in shoulder instability management include the evolution of the arthroscopic Bankart repair, the introduction of the remplissage technique for Hill-Sachs lesions, and the development of arthroscopic Latarjet procedures. Additionally, novel techniques such as Dynamic Anterior Stabilization (DAS) and bone block procedures have emerged as promising solutions for complex instability cases. In rotator cuff repair, innovations such as the suture-bridge double-row technique, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), and biological augmentation strategies, including dermal allografts and bioinductive patches, have contributed to improving tendon healing and functional outcomes. The role of biologic augmentation, including biceps tendon autografts and subacromial bursa augmentation, is also gaining traction in enhancing repair durability. Conclusions: As arthroscopic techniques continue to evolve, the integration of biologic solutions and patient-specific surgical planning will likely define the future of shoulder surgery. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of current state-of-the-art techniques and discusses their clinical implications, with a focus on optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing surgical failure rates.

Bone Marrow Stimulation Yielded Similar Clinical Outcomes With Improved Tendon Healing and Abduction Strength Compared With Decortication for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Shoulder Active Patients

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes and tendon healing between bone marrow stimulation (BMS) and decortication as footprint preparation techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in shoulder active patients.

METHODS

This double-blinded randomized clinical trial recruited 120 patients aged older than 45 years, at active levels, and diagnosed with chronic unilateral rotator cuff tears. Participants were 1:1 randomized to undergo ARCR using the double-row suture-bridge technique with BMS (BMS group) or with decortication (DEC group) for footprint preparation. The primary outcome was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (range, 0-100, with greater scores indicating better shoulder function and fewer symptoms) at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes, physical examinations, and rotator cuff integrity (evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging using a 5-graded system).

RESULTS

Of the 120 participants (age, 58.7 ± 8.1 years; 83 females [69.2%]) enrolled and randomized between May 2017 and November 2021, 109 (90.8%) were analyzed with the completion of follow-up visits. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores at 24 months were not statistically significantly different between the BMS and DEC groups (89.2 ± 12.2 vs 87.8 ± 13.9; adjusted difference, 1.7; 95% confidence interval -3.3 to 6.7; P = .498). The BMS group showed superior rotator cuff integrity (incomplete healing, 33.9% vs 54.7%; P = .029) and abduction muscle strength (8.7 ± 3.2 vs 7.4 ± 3.3 kg; P = .031) at 24 months as compared with the DEC group; the superiority was more significant in the subgroup of participants with higher shoulder activity levels. The rates of adverse events were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among shoulder active patients undergoing ARCR, BMS did not result in superior patient-reported outcomes at 24 months postoperatively compared with decortication. Nevertheless, BMS resulted in greater rates of tendon healing and clinically significant improvement in abduction strength and thus can be recommended in patients requiring high levels of manual labor or sports activities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized clinical trial.

Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Current Concepts

» Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) are a common pathology with a likely high asymptomatic incidence rate, particularly in the overhead athlete.» The anatomy, 5-layer histology, and relationship to Ellman's classification of PTRCTs have been well studied, with recent interest in radiographic predictors such as the critical shoulder angle and acromial index.» Depending on the definition of tear progression, rates of PTRCT progression range from 4% to 44% and appear related to symptomatology and work/activity level.» Nearly all PTRCTs should be managed conservatively initially, particularly in overhead athletes, with those that fail nonoperative management undergoing arthroscopic debridement ± acromioplasty if <50% thickness or arthroscopic conversion repair or in situ repair if >50% thickness.» Augmentation of PTRCTs is promising, with leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma having the most robust body of supportive data. Mesenchymal signaling cell biologics and the variety of scaffold onlay augments require more rigorous studies before regular usage.

Similar Healing Rates of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With and Without Bone Marrow Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) techniques such as microfracture, nanofracture, and the crimson duvet procedure expose the bone marrow of the proximal humerus to the rotator cuff tendon footprint. The effect of performing BMS on tendon healing is a subject of interest.

PURPOSE

To compare studies on arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with BMS versus without BMS for rotator cuff tears according to healing rates and clinical and radiological outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

The 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed in conducting a search. Studies that compared arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without BMS were included if they provided postoperative patient-reported outcomes and healing rates. Dichotomous outcomes were expressed as mean differences (MDs), while continuous outcomes were expressed as odds ratio.

RESULTS

Included were 5 studies (N = 499 shoulders); 4 studies had level 1 evidence, and 1 study had level 2 evidence. The healing rate of rotator cuff repair was similar between the 2 groups (ie, with and without BMS) (odds ratio, 1.58 [95% CI, 0.63 to 4.00]; P = .33). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the postoperative Constant score (MD, 1.41 [95% CI, -0.58 to 3.39]; P = .16), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (MD, 0.77 [95% CI, -1.43 to 2.96]; P = .49), or range of motion for forward flexion (MD, 2.45 [95% CI, -0.66 to 5.57]; P = .12) and external rotation (MD, 0.81 [95% CI, -2.35 to 3.97]; P = .62) at the final follow-up between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The healing rate of rotator cuff repair was similar, regardless of whether BMS was performed or not. Additionally, there was no significant difference in postoperative patient-reported outcome scores, range of motion, and complications.

REGISTRATION

CRD42023388427 (PROSPERO).

Bone Marrow Stimulation Does Not Lead to Lower Retear Rates, Better Functional Outcomes, or Higher Complication Rates at Short-Term Follow-Up for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of bone marrow stimulation (BMS) on retear rates, functional outcomes, and complication rates in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were searched on March 25, 2023. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodologic quality of the enrolled studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan software, version 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 7 randomized controlled trials with 638 patients were included. The evaluation of rotator cuff tendon integrity was conducted using distinct imaging modalities. Specifically, 259 patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging whereas 208 patients underwent ultrasound. Additionally, a subset of 95 patients underwent either of these modalities; however, the precise distribution between these 2 modalities was not explicitly delineated. Compared with RCR alone, RCR combined with BMS provided similar retear rates (P = .51, I2 = 46%), Constant-Murley scores (P = .14, I2 = 0%), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (standardized shoulder assessment form) scores (P = .56, I2 = 0%), Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index scores (P = .20, I2 = 0%), visual analog scale scores (P = .19, I2 = 0%), forward flexion (P = .18, I2 = 0%), external rotation (P = .62, I2 = 0%), severe complication rates (P = .56, I2 = 0%), and mild complication rates (P = .10, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the outcomes observed after isolated arthroscopic RCR, arthroscopic RCR with BMS showed comparable results in terms of retear rate, functional outcomes, and incidence of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and II studies.

Editorial Commentary: Bone Marrow Stimulation or Microfracture May Not Enhance the Success of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Bone Marrow Stimulation (BMS) is intended to provide a very low-cost, local source of marrow elements to improve healing and outcomes following rotator cuff repair. However, meta-analysis does not show that this results in improvement in rotator cuff tear outcomes or healing (as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound). That said, some studies do show lower retear rates with BMS; thus, when faced with challenged biology, this low-cost and low-risk solution may still have merit.

Considering the Cellular Landscape in Marrow Stimulation Techniques for Cartilage Repair

BACKGROUND

Marrow stimulation is a common reparative approach to treat injuries to cartilage and other soft tissues (e.g., rotator cuff). It involves the recruitment of bone marrow elements and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into the defect, theoretically initiating a regenerative process. However, the resulting repair tissue is often weak and susceptible to deterioration with time. The populations of cells at the marrow stimulation site (beyond MSCs), and their contribution to inflammation, vascularity, and fibrosis, may play a role in quality of the repair tissue.

SUMMARY

In this review, we accomplish three goals: (1) systematically review clinical trials on the augmentation of marrow stimulation and evaluate their assumptions on the biological elements recruited; (2) detail the cellular populations in bone marrow and their impact on healing; and (3) highlight emerging technologies and approaches that could better guide these specific cell populations towards enhanced cartilage or soft tissue formation.

KEY MESSAGES

We found that most clinical trials do not account for cell heterogeneity, nor do they specify the regenerative element recruited, and those that do typically utilize descriptions such as "clots," "elements," and "blood." Furthermore, our review of bone marrow cell populations demonstrates a dramatically heterogenous cell population, including hematopoietic cells, immune cells, fibroblasts, macrophages, and only a small population of MSCs. Finally, the field has developed numerous innovative techniques to enhance the chondrogenic potential (and reduce the anti-regenerative impacts) of these various cell types. We hope this review will guide approaches that account for cellular heterogeneity and improve marrow stimulation techniques to treat chondral defects.

Effect of Bone Marrow Stimulation on Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a common orthopaedic procedure, but it has a high rate of retears that can negatively affect the functional outcomes. Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been suggested as an additional treatment to improve the outcomes of RCR.

Purpose

To compare the effectiveness of the BMS procedure during RCR with conventional RCR.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, on March 1, 2023, for studies comparing postoperative retear rates and functional outcomes between patients who underwent primary arthroscopic RCR with and without the BMS procedure. Only level 1 and 2 randomized controlled trials with a minimum 12-month follow-up were included. The primary outcomes were retear rates and functional outcomes as measured by the Constant; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES); and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scores and by postoperative range of motion. Subgroup analyses were performed based on repair technique (single-row repair vs double-row or suture-bridge repair). The standardized mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR) were utilized to synthesize continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Homogeneity was evaluated using the chi-square test and I2 statistic.

Results

The literature search yielded 661 articles, of which 6 studies (522 patients; 261 with BMS, 261 without BMS) met the eligibility criteria. The combined analysis showed no significant decrease in retear rates with the utilization of the BMS procedure during RCR (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.03; P = .07; I2 = 24%). There was no significant intergroup difference in functional outcomes (Constant score: SMD, 0.13; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.31; P = .13; I2 = 0%; ASES score: SMD, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.20 to 0.28; P = .73; I2 = 0%; UCLA score: SMD, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.50 to 0.23; P = .47; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in postoperative retear risk or total Constant score according to the repair technique.

Conclusion

Based on the available evidence, this systematic review did not find a significant benefit of the BMS procedure at the footprint during arthroscopic RCR compared with conventional RCR in terms of retear rates and functional outcomes at short-term follow-up.

Bone channeling in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I studies

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing controversy regarding the effect of bone channeling in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Since the most recent systematic reviews in 2019, several large high-level trials have been completed. This study assessed all available level I randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without bone marrow channeling.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted through mid January 2023. Two reviewers performed screening of studies meeting the eligibility criteria: English-language RCTs in patients aged ≥18 years comparing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of full-thickness tears with and without bone marrow channeling (channeling group and control group, respectively). Functional scores, pain, healing rates, and reoperations were reviewed using pooled analysis where appropriate. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

A total of 6 randomized studies (N = 593) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis of all 6 studies showed no significant mean difference in function (1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.63 to 3.26), as measured by the Constant-Murley score. Retear rates were also not statistically different between groups (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.71), with pooled retear rates of 19.6% (48 of 245) with channeling and 19.8% (51 of 257) without. The other outcomes of interest were only available for analysis in a subset of studies. There were no standardized mean differences in pain (0.09; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.36), and there were similar reoperation rates (risk ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.43 to 3.34) in the channeling and control groups. For the included studies, the overall quality of evidence by outcome was judged to be moderate (function, pain, and reoperations) or low (retear rates), mainly owing to risk of bias (all outcomes) and inconsistency (retear rates).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study refute the findings of prior systematic reviews that showed that channeling reduces the retear rate when combined with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This meta-analysis of level I evidence, including recent larger RCTs, demonstrates that bone marrow stimulation in the setting of primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has no significant effect on functional outcomes, healing, pain, or reoperation rates.

Losartan in Combination With Bone Marrow Stimulation Showed Synergistic Effects on Load to Failure and Tendon Matrix Organization in a Rabbit Model

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of combining bone marrow stimulation (BMS) with oral losartan to block transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) on biomechanical repair strength in a rabbit chronic injury model.

METHODS

Forty rabbits were randomly allocated into 4 groups (10 in each group). The supraspinatus tendon was detached and left alone for 6 weeks to establish a rabbit chronic injury model and was then repaired in a surgical procedure using a transosseous, linked, crossing repair construct. The animals were divided into the following groups: control group (group C), surgical repair only; BMS group (group B), surgical repair with BMS of the tuberosity; losartan group (group L), surgical repair plus oral losartan (TGF-β1 blocker) for 8 weeks; and BMS-plus-losartan group (group BL), surgical repair plus BMS plus oral losartan for 8 weeks. At 8 weeks after repair, biomechanical and histologic evaluations were performed.

RESULTS

The biomechanical testing results showed significantly higher ultimate load to failure in group BL than in group B (P = .029) but not compared with group C or group L. A 2 × 2 analysis-of-variance model found that the effect of losartan on ultimate load significantly depended on whether BMS was performed (interaction term F1,28 = 5.78, P = .018). No difference was found between the other groups. No difference in stiffness was found between any groups. On histologic assessment, groups B, L, and BL showed improved tendon morphology and an organized type I collagen matrix with less type III collagen compared with group C. Group BL showed the most highly organized tendon matrix with more type I collagen and less type III collagen, which indicates less fibrosis. Similar results were found at the bone-tendon interface.

CONCLUSIONS

Rotator cuff repair combined with oral losartan and BMS of the greater tuberosity showed improved pullout strength and a highly organized tendon matrix in this rabbit chronic injury model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Tendon healing or scarring is accompanied by the formation of fibrosis, which has been shown to result in compromised biomechanical properties, and is therefore a potential limiting factor in healing after rotator cuff repair. TGF-β1 expression has been shown to play an important role in the formation of fibrosis. Recent studies focusing on muscle healing and cartilage repair have found that the downregulation of TGF-β1 by losartan intake can reduce fibrosis and improve tissue regeneration in animal models.

Extreme Medialized Repair for Challenging Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Reveals Healing and Significant Functional Improvement

PURPOSE

To evaluate range of motion, muscle strength, clinical outcomes, and radiographic results of the extreme medialized procedure on rotator cuff tears that were initially irreparable.

METHODS

From arthroscopic rotator cuff repair cases performed at our institution (June 2017 and August 2020), we retrospectively reviewed cases in which the rotator cuff was (1) unable to be withdrawn to the greater tuberosity, (2) repaired using the extreme medialized procedure, and (3) followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Patients with a history of previous surgery were excluded. Preoperative and postoperative scores were used for clinical evaluation. Imaging evaluation used 2-year postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients met the criteria; mean age 68.2 ± 7.9 (range 51-82) years; mean follow-up period 26 ± 2 (24-37) months. Tear size: 45 ± 7.1 (30-70) mm in medial to lateral diameters, 40 ± 9.3 (30-60) mm in anteroposterior diameter; suture anchor number: 5.5 ± 1.2 (4-8). The visual analog scale score (50.7 to 11.8), the University of California, Los Angeles, score (12 to 31), constant score (45 to 31), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (53 to 31) at the final follow-up improved compared with preoperative values (all P < .0001). Preoperative and postoperative changes in range of motion also showed improvement in anterior elevation (107° to 151°, P < .0001), abduction (100° to 154°, P < .0001), external rotation (41° to 47°, P = .0238), and internal rotation (L1 to Th10, P < .0001). Muscle strength was also improved in abduction (from 1.9 kg to 5.0 kg, P < .0001) and external rotation (from 3.5 kg to 7.7 kg, P < .0001). MR imaging evaluation revealed 2 cases (3.1%) of retears that fell into type 4 Sugaya classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Extremely medialized repair of large and massive tears not able to be repaired using conventional techniques led to improved clinical outcomes compared to preoperative conditions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Combined Biologic Augmentation Strategies with Collagen Patch Graft, Microfractures, and Platelet Concentrate Injections Improve Functional and Structural Outcomes of Arthroscopic Revision Rotator Cuff Repair

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair (ARRCR) is challenging. Biologic strategies seem to be promising. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of microfractures of the greater tuberosity, augmentation with collagen patch graft, and platelet concentrate injections in ARRCR.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients that underwent ARRCR with a minimum follow-up of two years. Patients in the augmentation group underwent ARRCR combined with microfractures, collagen patch graft, and postoperative subacromial injections of platelet concentrate. A standard rotator cuff repair was performed in the control group.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Constant-Murley score (CMS).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

disease-specific, health-related quality of life using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; assessment of tendon integrity with magnetic resonance at least six months after surgery. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included. Mean follow-up was 36.2 ± 8.7 months. The mean CMS was greater in the augmentation group (p = 0.022). No differences could be found for DASH score. Healing failure rate was higher in the control group (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Biologic augmentation of ARRCR using a combination of microfractures, collagen patch graft, and subacromial injections of platelet concentrate is an effective strategy in improving tendon healing rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

retrospective cohort study, level III.

Delamination of rotator cuff tears: Real-time dynamic ultrasound findings

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of diagnosing delaminated tears and ultrasonic characteristics on real-time dynamic ultrasound.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 143 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between April 2020 and January 2021. All patients were examined using real-time dynamic ultrasound of the shoulder within 2 weeks before arthroscopy. In our study, delaminated tears were defined as intratendinous horizontal splitting with or without the retraction of the articular or bursal layer of tendon. Delaminated tears were classified into three types on the basis of their shape: greater retraction of the articular layer (type I), greater retraction of the bursal layer (type II), and equal retraction of both layers (type III). The sensitivity and specificity of real-time dynamic ultrasound for evaluation of delaminated tears were calculated using arthroscopy findings as the gold standard. Ultrasonic imaging appearances of delaminated rotator cuff tears were further described.

RESULTS

Of the 143 patients, 47 (32.9%) had delaminated tears as confirmed by arthroscopy; 35 of these tears involved the supraspinatus tendon and 12 involved both supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons. Real-time dynamic ultrasound correctly diagnosed 36 of 47 delaminated tears with sensitivity 72.0% (57.2%-83.3%) and specificity 96.7% (90.2%-99.2%). Moreover, type I tear (n = 32) was more common than type II (n = 11) and type III tears (n = 4). Real-time dynamic ultrasound evaluated shape of type I, type II, and type III with a sensitivity and specificity of 56% and 80%, 72% and 83%, and 100% and 98%, respectively. Anechoic horizontal linear splitting of tendon, unequal retraction of the bursal and articular layers, and thinning of the suffering tendon were the three signs observed during real-time dynamic ultrasound examination. These three signs were indicative of a diagnosis of delaminated rotator cuff tears with high specificities (100.0%, 100.0%, and 97.9%, respectively) but relatively low sensitivities (25.5%, 25.5%, and 36.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Real-time dynamic ultrasound can be practically used for diagnosing delamination of rotator cuff tears with medium sensitivity and high specificity. Anechoic horizontal linear splitting of tendon, unequal retraction of the bursal and articular layers, and thinning of the involved tendon are the three important ultrasonic signs for diagnosis of delaminated rotator cuff tears.

The role of bone marrow stimulation in rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to investigate whether RCR (rotator cuff repair) with BMS (bone marrow stimulation) can provide a lower retear rate and better shoulder function than arthroscopic RCR alone in rotator cuff tear (RCT) patients.

METHOD

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched until Feb 2022. Risk of bias for randomized controlled trials was evaluated by two independent reviewers with Cochrane collaboration risk bias of tool, and that for cohort studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The primary outcome was the retear rate. Secondary outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Scale (UCLA) score, Constant-Murley score (CMS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the effect of suture method and tear size on BMS procedure.

RESULT

Five randomized controlled trials and four cohort studies with a total of 827 patients were included. The pooled retear rate between the RCR with BMS group and the RCR alone group was significantly different (17.5% vs. 28.9%; P < 0.0001). There were no differences in the ASES score, UCLA score and VAS score. The CMS was significantly higher in RCR with BMS group than the RCR alone groups (P = 0.02), while the difference was well below the MCID. RCR with BMS resulted in a significantly lower retear rate than RCR alone for large and massive RCTs (19.7% vs. 32.5%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compared with RCR alone, RCR with BMS can significantly reduce the retear rate in arthroscopic RCT patients while not clinically relevant differences were found. BMS may further reduce the retear rate of large and massive RCTs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Relationship between hematoma-like tissue on the footprint and structural outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a transosseous technique

Background

We have tried to create hematoma over the footprint site at the end of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) surgery, expecting to apply biochemical effects of the platelet-related factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the presence of hematoma-like tissue (HLT) on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and to evaluate the relationship between the HLT and the structural outcomes of ARCR.

Materials and methods

Twenty-five patients were reviewed with a mean age at surgery of 69.8 years (range, 52-85 years). Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 1 week, 6-8 weeks, and >6 months postoperatively. Structural outcomes for the repaired cuff and thickness of HLT were evaluated on coronal T2-weighted images. Signal intensity of HLT was evaluated on coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed images as the ratio compared to supraspinatus tendon intensity (HLT/SSP ratio).

Results

Structural outcomes showed Sugaya type 1 in 12 shoulders, type 2 in 4, and type 3 in 9. HLT thickness was significantly thicker at 1 week and 6-8 weeks postoperatively in Sugaya type 1 patients than in type 3 patients (1 week; P = .014, 6-8 weeks; P < .001). HLT/SSP ratio gradually decreased (at 1 week; 1.9 ± 0.7, 6-8 weeks; 1.6 ± 0.6, >6 months; 1.2 ± 0.5), and differed significantly between >6 months and both 1 week and 6-8 weeks (P < .001 each).

Outcomes After Combined Remnant Preservation and Bone Marrow Stimulation for Acute Rotator Cuff Tears

Background

Both remnant preservation (RP) and bone marrow stimulation (BMS) enhance the healing potential of the repaired rotator cuff by improving the biological milieu of the tendon-bone interface.

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical and imaging outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a combined RP-BMS technique in patients with acute rotator cuff tears.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Between January 2016 and June 2019, a total of 56 patients were diagnosed with acute rotator cuff tears; 29 patients underwent conventional repair (group 1), and 27 patients underwent RP-BMS (group 2). At a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, the authors compared clinical outcomes with the University of California-Los Angeles; Constant; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; and pain visual analog scale scores as well as shoulder range of motion. Tendon integrity and retear were assessed on magnetic resonance imaging according to the Sugaya classification (intact, grades 1-3; retear, grades 4-5). Between-group comparisons were conducted using the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables.

Results

In both groups, patients had significant preoperative to postoperative improvement on all clinical outcome measures (P = .001 for all). Shoulder abduction in group 2 was significantly greater compared with group 1 at the postoperative 3-month (107.37° ± 8.32° vs 95.44° ± 8.78°; P = .001), 6-month (155.25° ± 10.02° vs 144.72° ± 9.28°; P = .001), and final (165.15° ± 9.17° vs 158.31° ± 8.01°; P = .021) follow-ups. At the final follow-up, significantly more patients in group 2 had intact tendons (Sugaya grades 1-3) compared with group 1 (P = .015), and the tendon retear rate was lower in group 2 (1/27; 3.70%) than in group 1 (7/29; 24.14%) (P = .033).

Conclusion

Both surgical techniques led to satisfactory clinical outcomes, but shoulder abduction was greater after the RP-BMS technique compared with conventional repair. RP-BMS may be an alternative surgical technique to improve tendon integrity and retear rates after the repair of acute rotator cuff tears.

Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been considered a well-established method for treating knee and ankle osteochondral lesions. Some studies have also shown that BMS can promote healing of the repaired tendon and enhance biomechanical properties during rotator cuff repair. Our purpose was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair rotator cuff (ARCR) with and without BMS.

Methods

A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google scholar, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 20, 2022. Data on retear rates, shoulder functional outcomes, visual analog score and range of motion were pooled and analyzed. Dichotomous variables were presented as odds ratios (OR), and continuous variables were presented as mean differences (MD). Meta-analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3.

Results

Eight studies involving 674 patients were included, with mean follow-up period ranging from 12 to 36.8 months. Compared to ARCR alone, the intraoperative combination of the BMS resulted in lower retear rates (P < 0.0001), but showed similar results in Constant score (P = 0.10), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score (P = 0.57), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (P = 0.23), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score (P = 0.31), VAS (visual analog score) score (P = 0.34), and range of motion (ROM) (forward flexion, P = 0.42; external rotation, P = 0.21). After sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses, no significant changes in statistical results were observed.

Conclusion

Compared to ARCR alone, the combination of intraoperative BMS can significantly reduce the retear rates, but showed similar short-term results in functional outcomes, ROM and pain. Better clinical outcomes are anticipated in the BMS group by improving structural integrity during long-term follow-up. Currently, BMS may be a viable option in ARCR based on its straightforward and cost-effective advantages.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022323379.

Double-Row Repair With Platelet-Rich Plasma Optimizes Retear Rates After Small to Medium Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

To compare the different interventions described in the literature for the surgical treatment of small and medium complete rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of small-medium, full-thickness rotator cuff tears published since 2000 was performed. Clinical characteristics, re-tear rates, range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data were collected. Interventions were compared via arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis in a random-effects model. Interventions were ranked for each domain (re-tear risk, pain, ROM, and PROs) via surface under the cumulative ranking curves.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies comprising 2046 shoulders (47% females, mean age 61 ± 3 years, mean follow-up 21 ± 5 months) were included. Interventions that ranked highest for minimizing re-tear risk included arthroscopic single-row repair (A+SR) or double-row repair (A+DR) with or without platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Open repair and A+SR repair with acromioplasty (ACP) ranked highest for pain relief. Interventions that ranked highest for ROM improvement included open repair, PT, and A+DR with or without ACP. Interventions that ranked highest for PROs included arthroscopic footprint microfracture with or without SR, open repair, and A+SR with or without ACP.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a network meta-analysis of level 1 studies, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a SR or DR construct demonstrates similar retear rates, PROs, and clinical outcomes. The highest-ranking treatment for minimizing retears was arthroscopic repair with DR constructs and PRP augmentation, although open repair and arthroscopic SR remain reliable options with excellent clinical outcomes. Addition of PRP to DR constructs trended toward a 56% decreased risk of retear as compared to DR repair alone. Although no single treatment emerged superior, several interventions offered excellent clinical improvements in pain, ROM, and PROs that exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I, systematic review and meta-analysis of level I studies.

Editorial Commentary: Rotator Cuff Repairs Fail at an Alarmingly High Rate During Long-Term Follow-Up: Graft Augmentation and Biologics May Improve Future Outcomes

Rotator cuff repairs (RCR) frequently fail to heal, particularly those with advanced fatty infiltration, supraspinatus and infraspinatus atrophy, narrowed acromiohumeral distance, and large-to-massive tear size. Unfortunately, the longer the follow up, the more sobering the statistics, with some reported retear rates ranging up to 94%. Importantly, recent long-term radiographic assessments after primary RCR reveal direct correlations between failure and patient-reported outcomes, functional deterioration, and ultimately, progression of glenohumeral arthritis and/or frank cuff tear arthropathy. As shoulder surgeons, we must continue to seek out novel approaches to improve tendon to bone healing and recapitulate the native rotator cuff enthesis. In doing so, we hope to engender more sustained subjective and objective results for our patients over time. Investigations are ongoing into several biomechanical and biological or structural adjuncts, from platelet-rich plasma and bone marrow aspirate concentrate to autograft or allograft structural augments. We must continue to push the envelope and refuse to settle for the current reality and alarmingly high failure rates following RCR.

Limited evidence for biological treatment measures for cartilage and tendon injuries of the shoulder

PURPOSE

To critically review the available literature on the usage of biologics to treat cartilage and tendon injuries of the shoulder.

METHODS

Four different databases were searched in January 2020 for studies reporting data on bone marrow stimulation, autologous chondrocyte implantation, platelet-rich plasma, autologous concentrated serum, and bone marrow aspirate concentrate for the treatment of cartilage and/or tendon injuries of the shoulder. Prospective, retrospective, cohort and case-control studies as well as case series, systematic reviews and laboratory studies (involving human tissue) were included. Cadaveric or animal studies were excluded. Findings were summarized and an expert opinion on trends was provided.

RESULTS

Although there is limited literature available on biologics in cartilage lesions of the shoulder, the advancement from micro- to nanofracture, that is well established for the treatment of cartilage lesions in the knee, may be the next step in the treatment of shoulder lesions as well. The high rate of failure and therefore the complexity of tendon healing following rotator cuff repair has led to a rising interest in biologic augmentation such as platelet-rich plasma and stem cells to enhance tendon-bone-healing and to decrease the prevalence of failure. Despite the increase in publications, there exists a huge heterogeneity of content, quality, and quantity of among studies and their processing methods reporting the use of platelet-rich plasma in rotator cuff repair.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions from individual studies cannot be generalized. Currently, no evidence supports that platelet-rich plasma provides clinical benefits in rotator cuff repair. Similar is reported for microfracture in rotator cuff repair, however, despite no clinical benefits, microfracture has shown to reduce the appearance of structural failures. Although some evidence exists for the use of stem cells form bone marrow aspirate concentrate, results from large case series are still lacking.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Management of the failed rotator cuff repair

Rotator cuff repair is increasingly being performed, and this is likely to continue to given the ageing population. An improvement in functional outcome can be achieved, with the best results noted in those tendons that go on to heal. Failure of repair following surgery can be associated with debilitating symptoms that are not always amenable to non-operative measures, so further surgery may be indicated for these patients. Several operative strategies have been described, but careful evaluation is required to determine the most suitable option. This review describes the decision-making strategies and treatment options available during management of a failed rotator cuff repair.

Anatomic based microfracture technique of insertion for rotator cuff repair in Vietnamese people: Case series study

Abstract

Postoperative tendon healing is still a matter of concern after rotator cuff repair. Several techniques have been introduced to help improve this healing process. Among them, the bone marrow is commonly used source and a research subject for methods using stem cells to promote wound healing process. A number of studies have shown that bone marrow stem cells can travel up through the holes on the rotator cuff insertion sites, contributing into the rotator cuff repair process, increasing the efficiency of tendon healing and improving clinical results.

Patients and methods

Cross-sectional descriptive study was performed on 41 rotator cuff tear patients. The microfractures for these patients were calculated beforehand, which have great depth but small diameter, based on the anatomical characteristic of the rotator cuff tear insertions of Vietnamese people. Patients' rotator cuff tendon healing processes were evaluated using ultrasound after surgery. Final tendon healing and clinical results ultimately rely on MRI assessments, classified according to Sugaya's classification, UCLA and ASES scale.

Results

No cases of rupture and fracture of the greater tubercle was recorded. There was a clear progression of tendon healing on ultrasound according to postoperative follow-up time-stamps (1 month, 3 months). MRI images evaluation also reveals at the latest follow-up time, according to Sugaya classification, the ratio of tendon healing was 87.8%, while the percentage of re-rupture was 12.2%. ASES and average UCLA scale were collected at the end of the study, respectively as 95.41 ± 5.45 and 32.36 ± 2.53.

Conclusion

The technique's microfractures characteristics based on the rotator cuff tear insertion anatomy ensures a secure, straightforward approach along with promising results in terms of tendon healing rate and postoperative functional outcomes.

Nontendinous healing after repairing of retracted rotator cuff tear: an imaging study

BACKGROUND

Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after rotator cuff repair can sometimes demonstrate healing with nontendinous tissue that extends from the footprint to the retracted tendon end, which is inferred as fibrous tissue formation. The aim was to investigate this particular finding and its significance.

METHODS

There were 494 eligible cases of healed supero-posterior medium-sized to massive rotator cuff repairs, after the exclusion of retears. A retrospective review was performed for the 3 groups that were divided according to their MRI appearances of healing: type I described the direct healing of the tendon to the footprint, whereas type II demonstrated the distinctive continuity of nontendinous tissue from the footprint to the retracted tendinous portion, and type III also showed a similar appearance but with obvious thinning of the tissue, without any evidence of defect confirmed on the routine outpatient ultrasonograph.

RESULTS

Only 108 of 494 patients (21.9%) demonstrated type I healing, whereas the signs of nontendinous healing were evident for the rest, with the 116 patients (23.5%) being classified as type III with attenuation. Comparing the preoperative tendon retraction, 34.8% and 37.2% of the Patte stages 2 and 3, respectively, resulted in type III healing, which were significantly higher compared with that of stage 1 (15.3%, P < .001). Type III healing had the highest average preoperative Goutallier grades. The average postoperative visual analog scale and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores have improved significantly for all 3 groups (P < .05), with the ASES score being 86.1±15.9 for type I, 93.7±36.1 for type II, and 87.8±15.1 for type III without significant differences between the groups (P = .3).

CONCLUSIONS

Only a fifth of the rotator cuff repairs led to a direct healing to the footprint, and the rest healed with MRI appearance of nontendinous tissue formation bridging the retracted tendinous portion and the footprint. These MRI appearances did not represent the true tendinous tissue formation between the torn end of the tendon and the bone after healing. Such appearances did not seem to affect the clinical outcomes.

Repair Tension During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair is Correlated With Preoperative Tendon Retraction and Postoperative Rotator Cuff Integrity

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the correlation of repair tension during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) with preoperative factors and to evaluate whether measuring tension during ARCR is effective for predicting rotator cuff integrity after ARCR.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ARCR from May 2014 to June 2017 were enrolled in this study. Inclusion criteria were patients with medium or larger-sized tears and with a minimum of 6 months' follow-up. Patients with a partial repair were excluded. Intraoperative repair tension was measured according to Davidson's method. Correlation of repair tension with preoperative factors was evaluated with Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient tests. Logistic regression analysis was performed on intraoperative factors, including repair tension, to identify independent predictors of retear after ARCR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cutoff value of repair tension for retear.

RESULTS

One-hundred twenty patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean repair tension was 26.6 ± 12.6 N, and retear was found in 29 shoulders (24.2%). Among the preoperative factors, tear size in the mediolateral (P < .001) and anteroposterior (P < .001) directions, DeOrio and Cofield's classification (P <0.001), geometric classification (P <.001), and fatty infiltration of supraspinatus (P = .006) and infraspinatus (P = .003) were significantly correlated with repair tension. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis identified only tear size in the mediolateral direction as an independent predictor of repair tension (P = .036). Logistic regression analysis showed that repair tension (P = .02) and geometric classification (P < .001) are significant factors affecting rotator cuff integrity after ARCR. ROC curve analysis showed the cutoff value of repair tension of large to massive tears for retear to be 35.6 N.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that intraoperative repair tension is strongly correlated with tear size in the mediolateral direction based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and that measuring tension during ARCR is effective for predicting rotator cuff integrity after ARCR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic study.

Use of biologics in rotator cuff disorders: Current concept review

Poor tendon to bone healing following rotator cuff repair has led to the continued interest and investigation into biological augmentation. The biology of tendinopathy is not fully understood and consequently the availability of disease modifying therapeutic targets is limited. A ceiling of benefit has been reached by mechanical optimisation of rotator cuff repair and thus, in order to improve healing rates, a biological solution is required. This review focuses on the strategies to biologically augment rotator cuff disorders with an emphasis on rotator cuff repair. Leucocyte rich platelet rich plasma has been shown to improve healing rates without clinically relevant improvements in outcome scores. Similarly, improved healing rates have also been reported with bone marrow stimulation and in long-term follow-up with bone marrow concentrate. Extracellular matrix (ECM) and synthetic scaffolds can increase healing through mechanical and or biological augmentation. A potential third category of scaffold is bio-inductive and has no mechanical support. Studies involving various scaffolds have shown promising results for augmentation of large to massive tears and is likely to be most beneficial when tendon quality is poor, however level I evidence is limited.

Footprint preparation with nanofractures in a supraspinatus repair cuts in half the retear rate at 1-year follow-up. A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate if adding nanofractures to the footprint of a supraspinatus tear repair would have any effect in the outcomes at one-year follow-up.

METHODS

Multicentric, triple-blinded, randomized trial with 12-months follow-up. Subjects with isolated symptomatic reparable supraspinatus tears smaller than 3 cm and without grade 4 fatty infiltration were included. These were randomized to two groups: In the Control group an arthroscopic supraspinatus repair was performed; in the Nanofracture group the footprint was additionally prepared with nanofractures (1 mm wide, 9 mm deep microfractures). Clinical evaluation was done with Constant score, EQ-5D-3L, and Brief Pain Inventory. The primary outcome was the retear rate in MRI at 12-months follow-up. Secondary outcomes were: characteristics of the retear (at the footprint or at the musculotendinous junction) and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-one subjects were randomized. Two were lost to follow-up, leaving 69 participants available for assessment at 12-months follow-up (33 in the Control group and 36 in the Nanofracture Group). The Nanofracture group had lower retear rates than the Control group (7/36 [19.4%] vs 14/33 [42.4%], differences significant, p = 0.038). Retear rates at the musculotendinous junction were similar but the Nanofracture group had better tendon healing rates to the bone (34/36 [94.4%] vs. 24/33 [66.71%], p = 0.014). Clinically both groups had significant improvements, but no differences were found between groups.

CONCLUSION

Adding nanofractures at the footprint during an isolated supraspinatus repair lowers in half the retear rate at 12-months follow-up. This is due to improved healing at the footprint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Does application of abduction brace after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair improve blood flow around posterosuperior rotator cuff and repair site, affecting pain levels and clinical and structural outcomes? A pilot randomized controlled trial

Background

As per some cadaveric studies, blood flow in posterosuperior rotator cuff tendons improves in the abducted shoulder position compared with the neutral position. In a clinical post–rotator cuff repair scenario, the impact of abduction on altered blood flow in and around the posterosuperior rotator cuff tendons is unknown in terms of clinical outcomes and structural healing.

Materials and methods

This study included 42 eligible patients aged between 40 and 70 years with clinically diagnosed and radiologically confirmed rotator cuff tears undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo application of either an abduction brace (group 1) or an arm pouch (group 2). On postoperative day 1, power Doppler scanning was performed on the index shoulder in adduction and 30° of abduction in each patient; the allocated treatment (abduction brace or arm pouch) was then applied. Power Doppler scanning was repeated at 6 weeks in the immobilization position assigned to the patient (abduction or adduction). The vascular flow in 6 regions was noted as per the criteria of Fealy et al. A visual analog scale score was assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 56 weeks postoperatively. Clinical assessment was performed with the Constant-Murley score at 1 year, and structural healing of the cuff was assessed using ultrasonography at 3 and 12 months.

Result

On the first postoperative day, blood flow was significantly higher in all 6 areas of the shoulder in group 1 than in group 2. The mean total vascular score was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 on postoperative day 1 (P = .0001) and remained so at 6 weeks (P = .0001). However, significantly higher vascular flow was noted only in the peribursal region at 6 weeks in group 1 (P = .04). No significant difference in the visual analog scale score was noted between the 2 groups at any given point of follow-up. Furthermore, no clinical and structural healing differences were noted between the 2 groups at final follow-up.

Conclusion

Higher blood flow in and around the posterosuperior rotator cuff owing to an abducted shoulder position with an abduction brace in the first 6 weeks postoperatively fails to offer any advantage in terms of lower pain levels, better clinical scores, or superior cuff healing.

Editorial Commentary: Augmenting Suture Anchor Fixation: Why Has It Not Caught on?

Biomechanical studies with reliable clinical applicability are challenging to carry out. The results can be heavily dependent on the materials being tested (condition and ages of specimens), environmental conditions (temperature, moisture), magnitude and direction of loading, loading characteristics (static, dynamic), loading cycles and frequency, and how one measures and defines failure. The interested reader gains more confidence in the results and recommendations of a biomechanics study if the methodology reasonably models real-world scenarios and multiple studies from different labs all come to the same general conclusion.