Combined Biologic Augmentation Strategies with Collagen Patch Graft, Microfractures, and Platelet Concentrate Injections Improve Functional and Structural Outcomes of Arthroscopic Revision Rotator Cuff Repair

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair (ARRCR) is challenging. Biologic strategies seem to be promising. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of microfractures of the greater tuberosity, augmentation with collagen patch graft, and platelet concentrate injections in ARRCR.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients that underwent ARRCR with a minimum follow-up of two years. Patients in the augmentation group underwent ARRCR combined with microfractures, collagen patch graft, and postoperative subacromial injections of platelet concentrate. A standard rotator cuff repair was performed in the control group.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Constant-Murley score (CMS).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

disease-specific, health-related quality of life using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; assessment of tendon integrity with magnetic resonance at least six months after surgery. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included. Mean follow-up was 36.2 ± 8.7 months. The mean CMS was greater in the augmentation group (p = 0.022). No differences could be found for DASH score. Healing failure rate was higher in the control group (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Biologic augmentation of ARRCR using a combination of microfractures, collagen patch graft, and subacromial injections of platelet concentrate is an effective strategy in improving tendon healing rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

retrospective cohort study, level III.

Two-year outcomes with a bioinductive collagen implant used in augmentation of arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: final results of a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Full-thickness rotator cuff tears (FTRCTs) represent a common shoulder injury that, if untreated, can progress in size, become increasingly painful, and inhibit function. These lesions are often surgically repaired, with double-row arthroscopic repair often preferred for larger tears. Biological augmentation technologies have been developed to improve rates of postoperative radiographic retear and enhance patient-reported outcomes after surgical FTRCT repair. This study sought to confirm that augmented repair with a bioinductive bovine collagen implant results in favorable retear rates and patient outcomes with follow-up to 2 years.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter cohort study was undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of augmenting single- or double-row arthroscopic repair of FTRCTs with a bioinductive bovine collagen implant. Of 115 adult patients participating, 66 (57.4%) had medium (1-3-cm) tears and 49 (42.6%) had large (3-5-cm) tears. Magnetic resonance imaging and patient-reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES] and Constant-Murley Score [CMS]) were performed and recorded at baseline, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years.

RESULTS

Mean duration of follow-up was 2.1 years (range, 1.5-2.9 years). Between baseline and 2-year follow-up, mean total thickness of the supraspinatus tendon increased by 12.5% for medium tears and by 17.1% for large tears. Radiographic retear was noted in 7 of 61 available patients (11.5%) with medium tears, and in 14 of 40 patients (35.0%) with large tears. In both groups, these tears primarily occurred before the 3-month follow-up visit (13 of 21 [61.9%]). Radiographic retear with the supplemented double-row (DR) repair technique was 13.2% overall (12 of 91 DR patients; 11.3% for medium tears and 15.8% for large tears). The minimal clinically important difference was achieved by >90% of patients with both medium and large tears for both ASES and CMS. There were 2 serious adverse events classified by the treating surgeon as being possibly related to the device and/or procedure (1 case of swelling/drainage and 1 case of intermittent pain). Nine patients (7.8%; 4 medium tears and 5 large tears) required reoperation of the index rotator cuff surgery.

CONCLUSION

Final 2-year data from this study confirm that using this implant in augmentation of arthroscopic double-row repair of FTRCTs provides favorable rates of radiographic retear and substantial functional recovery. The relative safety of the device is also further supported.

Retear rates and clinical outcomes at 1 year after repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears augmented with a bioinductive collagen implant: a prospective multicenter study

Background

Biologic technologies can potentially augment existing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to improve retear rates and postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate healing rates and clinical outcomes of full-thickness rotator cuff repairs augmented with a bioinductive bovine collagen implant.

Methods

In this prospective multicenter study, investigators enrolled 115 patients (mean age, 60.4 years) with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. There were 66 (57.4%) medium (1-3 cm) tears and 49 (42.6%) large (3-5 cm) tears. Eligible patients consisted of those ≥21 years of age with chronic shoulder pain lasting longer than 3 months and unresponsive to conservative therapy. Patients underwent single- or double-row repair augmented with a bioinductive bovine collagen implant. At the baseline, 3 months, and 1 year, magnetic resonance imaging was performed and patients were assessed for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score and Constant-Murley Score (CMS). The primary failure end point was retear, classified as any new full-thickness defect observed on magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

There were 13 retears (11.3%) at 3 months, with an additional 6 (19 total [16.5%]) found at 1 year. In large tears, double-row repair had a significantly lower rate of retear at 3 months (P = .0004) and 1 year (P = .0001) compared with single-row repair. ASES and CMS scores significantly improved between the baseline and 1 year for medium and large tears. At 1 year, the minimally clinically important difference for ASES and CMS was met by 91.7% (95% CI: 84.9-96.1) and 86.4% (95% CI: 78.2-92.4) of patients, respectively. Patients without retear and those <65 years of age had significantly better CMS scores at 1 year when compared with those with retear and those ≥65 years (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes based on treatment of the biceps tendon. Of 9 reported reoperations in the operative shoulder, only 2 were considered potentially related to the collagen implant.

Conclusion

Interim results from this prospective study indicate a favorable rate of retear relative to the literature and improvement in clinical function at 1 year after adjunctive treatment with the study implant augmenting standard arthroscopic repair techniques.

Clinical outcomes following arthroscopic repair of articular vs. bursal partial-thickness rotator cuff tears with follow-up of 2 years or more

Background

The diagnosis and treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears remain controversial, and only a few studies have carried out clinical evaluation and comparison based on different types of tears. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic cuff repairs using the suture bridge technique in patients with articular partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (APRCTs) vs. those with bursal partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (BPRCTs).

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 29 patients with APRCTs and 22 patients with BPRCTs who underwent arthroscopic cuff repair using the suture bridge technique with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Constant score (CS), active range of motion (ROM) of shoulder flexion and abduction, improvement rate for each score, and retear rate.

Results

The APRCT group had more women, fewer cases of subacromial decompression, and more patients whose condition changed intraoperatively and transitioned into a complete tear. Preoperatively, the JOA score, CS, ROM of shoulder flexion, ROM of shoulder abduction, and external shoulder rotation strength were lower in the APRCT group. Postoperatively, all scores improved significantly in both groups, and the JOA score, CS, and external shoulder rotation strength remained significantly lower in the APRCT group. Improvement and retear rates were not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusions

The suture bridge technique significantly improved the clinical outcomes of patients with APRCTs and BPRCTs. Preoperative and postoperative functional parameters were worse in APRCT patients.