Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for elective indications versus acute 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical and functional outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture versus rotator cuff arthropathy: A retrospective analysis

Introduction

The utility of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has evolved to accommodate many complex shoulder pathologies including proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) and fracture sequelae. Within our aging population, PHFs are occurring at higher rates than ever before. Literature assessing differences in clinical and functional following RTSA for PHF and rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) is limited. This study aims examine outcomes after RTSA for PHF and RCA at 2-years follow-up.

Methods

Records of who underwent RTSA for PHF and RCA at our institution between July 1, 2009 to October 1, 2019 with a 2-year minimum follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographic information, postoperative functional measurements, and complications were collected. A 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.

Results

Overall, 23 patients underwent RTSA for fracture and 123 for RCA. Fracture patients showed significantly worse forward elevation (128.9° ± 38.8° vs 141.9° ± 21.1°; p-value = 0.0242). No differences were observed in range of motion or strength for external rotation and internal rotation, as well as patient-reported outcome measures. Fracture patients showed a complication rate of 9.1 % and an implant survival rate of 78.0 % after 5 years. RCA patients experienced a 7.4 % complication rate and a 91.5 % survival rate after 5 years.

Discussion

RTSA has been shown to restore shoulder functionality in patients with complex PHFs. In this study, RTSA for fracture resulted in similar functionality, complication rates, and implant longevity when compared to elective indications.

[Decision-making process between plate osteosynthesis vs. endoprosthesis in proximal humerus fractures of the rheumatoid arthritis shoulder]

The shoulder joint is involved in a high percentage of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cases. At the same time, patients with RA develop osteoporosis at an early stage, which significantly increases the risk of fracture. In recent years, joint-preserving procedures with stable-angle implants have become available for individuals with low disease activity and good medication control. However, this approach is dependent on the fracture morphology and, if not adequately addressed, is associated with a high rate of revision surgery. In rotator cuff reconstruction, recent data show encouraging results regarding regenerative capacity, which does not necessarily indicate immediate reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Follow-up treatment must consider delayed osseous healing.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for elective indications should have separate Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes

BACKGROUND

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for fracture currently shares a single Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code with RSA for arthropathy despite potential differences in patient factors, procedural demands, postoperative care and needs, and overall hospital systems' resource utilization. We hypothesize that patients indicated for RSA for fracture will have greater medical complexity, require longer operative duration, have higher complication rates, demonstrate inferior functional outcomes, and require greater health care cost expenditures compared to a cohort undergoing RSA for rotator cuff arthropathy.

METHODS

A total of 383 RSAs were retrospectively reviewed from January 2011 to December 2020. Demographics, comorbidities, operative time, financial charge and cost data, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and all-cause revisions were assessed. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and active range of motion (AROM) were evaluated at 2, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

After exclusions, 197 total RSAs were included, with 28 for fracture and 169 for arthropathy indications. RSA operative time was longer for fractures with an average of 143.2 ± 33.7 minutes compared with 108.2 ± 33.9 minutes for arthropathy (P = .001). Average cost per patient for RSA for proximal humerus fracture was $2489 greater than the cost for RSA for elective indications; however, no statistically significant difference was noted between average costs (P = .126). LOS was longer for RSA for fracture compared to arthropathy, with a mean of 4.0 ± 3.6 days vs. 1.8 ± 2.3 days (P = .004). The fracture group was 3.6 times more likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility or inpatient rehabilitation (32% vs. 9%, P = .002). Early and late all-cause revisions were similar between groups. Differences in postoperative AROM for fracture vs. arthropathy were significant for active forward flexion at 2 months (95.5° ± 36.7° vs. 117.0° ± 32.3°, P = .020) and 6 months (110.9° ± 35.2° vs. 129.2° ± 28.3°, P = .020) as well as active adducted external rotation at 6 months (20.0° ± 20.9° vs. 33.1° ± 12.3°, P = .007) and at 12 months (23.3° ± 18.1° vs. 34.5° ± 13.8°, P = .012). No difference in VAS pain scores were noted between fracture and arthropathy groups at any time point.

DISCUSSION

RSA for fractures vs. arthropathy have substantial differences in patient characteristics, surgical complexity, and hospital resource utilization. This is of importance given the currently available CPT code does not differentiate indications for RSA, especially if intending to accurately document the surgical care delivered.

Complications following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is an increasingly common procedure for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), but postoperative complications have not been well characterized. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess complications and revision rates following rTSA in the management of PHFs as documented in current literature.

Methods

A systematic review was performed on primary rTSA for PHFs. In adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search was conducted between September and December of 2023, utilizing the databases PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to include relevant articles from any period. A total of 102 studies were identified for inclusion after initial screening of 3800 query results. Extracted data from each article included the publishing journal, level of evidence, study design, number of patients, mean age, age range, percent female, mean follow-up, specific postoperative complications, total complications, complication rate, number of revisions, and revision rate. Overall complication rates were determined by dividing total complications by total patients and multiplying by 100, which also applied to revision rates.

Results

Among 10,797 primary rTSA cases for PHFs identified from 102 studies, the mean age of patients was 75.6 ± 3.6 years, and 82.6% of patients were female. The average follow-up was 38.9 ± 21.0 months. The overall complication rate was 7.0% (754/10,797) with a range of 0% to 46.9%. The most common postoperative complications were prosthetic instability/dislocation (2.3%, 244/10,797; range: 0%-7%) and infection (1.2%, 131/10,797; range: 0%-2.5%). Periprosthetic fracture (0.8%), nerve injury (0.3%), and other complications were also documented. The overall revision rate was 3.3% (355/10,797; range: 0%-28%).

Conclusion

This systematic review summarizes the most common postoperative complications of rTSA for PHFs. The most frequent complication was prosthetic instability/dislocation, followed by infection. While the average total complication and revision rates were relatively low, there was wide variability, with some studies reporting rates as high as 46% and 28%, respectively.

Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

It is still unclear whether reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has advantages over traditional hemiarthroplasty (HA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) in the treatment of complex shoulder joint diseases. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of RTSA in the treatment of complex shoulder joint diseases and further determine whether it is necessary to expand the indications of RTSA.

METHOD

We conducted a systematic search of studies published between January 1, 2012 and May 31, 2023 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The experimental group included patients who underwent primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), while the control group consisted of patients who underwent primary hemiarthroplasty (HA) or anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA). The minimum follow-up period was 1 year, and a random-effects model was utilized for data synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 45 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compare to HA, RTSA showed significant advantages in postoperative ASES scores (p = 0.004), forward flexion (p < 0.0001), and abduction (p < 0.0001). Compare to ATSA, RTSA showed significantly lower postoperative Constant scores (p = 0.004), ASES scores (p = 0.001), SST scores (p < 0.0001), forward flexion (p < 0.0001), abduction (p = 0.011), internal rotation (p < 0.0001), and external rotation (p < 0.0001). Further meta regression analysis was conducted, considering factors such as region, age, gender ratio, and follow-up time, excluding the influence of relevant factors. Overall, RTSA did not demonstrate advantages in postoperative functional scores and range of motion. In terms of complication and revision rates, RTSA had lower rates compared to HA and ATSA, except for the complication rate, where there was no significant difference between RTSA and ATSA (p = 0.521), but statistically significant differences were observed in other measures.

CONCLUSION

RTSA demonstrates better clinical efficacy compared to HA but is inferior to ATSA. It can be considered for expanding treatment options for elderly patients with 3 or 4-part proximal humeral fractures, but it is not suitable for treating end-stage shoulder arthritis and humeral head necrosis. Overall, the decision to use RTSA should be carefully evaluated based on the extent of the patient's rotator cuff injury.

A 10-year comparative analysis of the 2 most common reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implants (Delta Xtend and SMR) in the New Zealand Joint Registry

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND

As the incidence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) continues to rise, better understanding of the long-term risks and complications is necessary to determine the best choice of implant. The majority (75%) of rTSAs performed in New Zealand use either SMR (Systema Multiplana Randelli; Lima-LTO) or Delta Xtend (DePuy Synthes). The aim of this registry-based study was to compare implant survival, risk of revision, and reasons for revision between the 2 most frequently used rTSA prostheses: SMR and Delta Xtend.

METHODS

Using data from the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2022, we identified 5891 patients who underwent rTSA using either SMR cementless (62.8%) or Delta Xtend prostheses (37.2%). Delta Xtend was subdivided into cementless (31.4% of total) and cemented humeral stem (5.8% of total) subgroups for analysis. Revision-free implant survival and functional outcomes (Oxford Shoulder Score [OSS] at 6 months, 5 years, and 10 years were adjusted by age, American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] grade, indication, sex, and surgeon volume for between-group comparisons.

RESULTS

Ten-year revision-free implant survival was 93.0%, 92.5%, and 95.8% for Delta Xtend cemented, Delta Xtend cementless, and SMR, respectively. The Delta Xtend cemented implant had a 2-fold higher adjusted revision risk compared with both the Delta Xtend cementless and the SMR cementless implants (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.04, P = .011; and HR = 2.59, P < .001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the Delta Xtend cementless and SMR cementless groups (HR = 1.28, P = .129). The Delta Xtend cemented group was significantly (P ≤ .01) older, had more comorbidities (ASA 3 or 4), female, and indicated for fracture compared with other groups. The most common reason(s) for revision was aseptic loosening and infection for Delta Xtend cementless; aseptic loosening, instability or dislocation, and infection for Delta Xtend cemented; and aseptic loosening alone for SMR cementless. Average OSS was significantly lower in Delta Xtend cemented compared with Delta Xtend cementless and SMR cementless at 6 months (30.8, 35.9 vs. 35.6, respectively, P < .01) and 5 years (37.4, 40.7 vs. 39.5, respectively, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we found that the Delta Xtend cemented group had more than a 2-fold risk of revision compared with Delta Xtend cementless and SMR cementless groups, whereas there was no difference in revision risk between the Delta Xtend and SMR cementless prostheses. As the incidence of rTSA continues to rise, better understanding of the long-term risks and complications is necessary to determine the best choice of implant.

Medialized vs. Lateralized Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is increasingly used in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with reliable clinical improvement. Lateralized RSA implants have conferred superior outcomes compared with the original Grammont design in patients with nontraumatic indications. However, in the setting of a PHF, lateralized components can place increased tension across the tuberosity fracture site and potentially compromise tuberosity healing and outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine the effect of implant design on clinical outcomes after RSA for PHFs.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried for clinical studies on RSA performed for PHFs that reported implant manufacturer details. Our primary outcomes included postoperative external rotation (ER), forward elevation (FE), abduction, Constant score, rate of greater tuberosity (GT) healing, and the incidence of complications compared between medialized vs. lateralized global implant design.

RESULTS

Globally lateralized RSA cohorts (478 RSAs total with cumulative lateral offset achieved through humeral or glenoid lateralization or both humeral and glenoid lateralization) were found to have a greater mean postoperative Constant score compared with globally medialized (medialized glenoid and medialized humerus) RSA cohorts with 1,494 total medialized RSAs (66 vs. 59, p = 0.006), but there was no significant difference regarding mean postoperative ER (30° vs. 22°, p = 0.078), FE (117° vs. 119°, p = 0.708), or abduction (103° vs. 107°, p = 0.377). On meta-regression, neither implant design nor tuberosity status significantly influenced postoperative ER, FE, abduction, or Constant score on meta-regression independent of mean follow-up and age at surgery. The rate of GT healing was greater in lateralized compared with medialized RSAs (88% vs. 72%, p < 0.001). On meta-regression, medialized RSA design was associated with a 73% lower odds of GT healing (odds ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval = 0.11-0.68, p = 0.007) independent of mean follow-up and age at surgery.

CONCLUSION

Lateralized RSA implants conferred no significant functional benefit over medialized implants when used in patients with PHFs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture has comparable 10-year outcomes to elective indications: results from the New Zealand Joint Registry

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND

Recently, the indication of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has expanded beyond rotator cuff arthropathy to include treatment of complex acute proximal humeral fracture (PHF). Limited previous studies have compared the long-term clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing RTSA for PHF vs. elective indications for degenerative conditions. The purpose of this study was to compare implant survivorship, reasons for revision and functional outcomes in patients undergoing RTSA for acute PHF with those undergoing elective RTSA in a population-based cohort study.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from the New Zealand Joint Registry from 1999 to 2021 and identified 6862 patients who underwent RTSA. Patients were categorized by preoperative indication, including PHF (10.8%), rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) (44.5%), osteoarthritis (OA) (34.1%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (5.5%), and old traumatic sequelae (5.1%). Revision-free implant survival and functional outcomes (Oxford Shoulder Scores [OSSs] at the 6-month, 5-year, and 10-year follow-ups) were adjusted by age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and surgeon experience and compared.

RESULTS

Revision-free implant survival at 10 years for RTSA for PHF was 97.3%, compared with 96.1%, 93.7%, 92.8%, and 91.3% for OA, RCA, RA and traumatic sequelae, respectively. When compared with RTSA for PHF, the adjusted risk of revision was significantly higher for traumatic sequelae (hazard ratio = 2.3, P = .023) but not for other elective indications. The most common reason for revision in the PHF group was dislocation or instability (42.9%), which was similar to the OA (47.6%) and traumatic sequelae (33.3%) groups. At 6 months post-surgery, OSSs were significantly lower for the PHF group compared with the RCA, OA, and RA groups (31.1 vs. 35.6, 37.7, and 36.5, respectively, P < .001), and similar to traumatic sequelae (31.7, P = .431). At 5 years, OSSs were only significantly lower for PHF compared with OA (37.4 vs. 41.0, P < .001) and there was no difference between the PHF and other groups. At 10 years, there were no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

RTSA for PHF demonstrated reliable long-term survivorship and functional outcomes compared with elective indications. Despite lower functional outcomes in the early postoperative period for the PHF group, implant survivorship was similar in patients undergoing RTSA for the primary indication of acute PHF compared with RCA, OA, and RA and superior compared to the primary indication of traumatic sequelae.

Comparison of Short Uncemented Metaphyseal Stem and Long-Stem Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Proximal Humerus Fractures: Preliminary Study at 2-Year Follow-Up

Introduction: In the last few years, short metaphyseal-socket prosthetic humeral stems have been introduced for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A short stem may have advantages in humeral force distribution, reducing shear stress and preserving bone stock, keeping in mind the need for possible future revision surgery. The main objective of our study was to validate the use of a short stem prosthesis in the surgical treatment of humeral fractures by comparing clinical and radiological outcomes of our studied implant with those obtained with the use of traditional long-stem implants. Methods: In this multicentric, controlled prospective study, 125 patients with proximal three- or four-fragment humerus fractures were selected and treated with RSA. A short stem was used in group A (n = 53, mean age: 75.6 ± 5.6 years old), and a long stem was used in group B (n = 72, mean age: 71.76 ± 3). Active range of motion (ROM), Constant score (CS), Quick DASH, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were collected and analyzed at 2 years mean follow-up, as well as humeral and glenoid bone resorption (sum Inoue scores and Sirveaux scores were used). Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between group A and B in ROM, Constant score (51.69 ± 15.8 vs. 53.46 ± 15.96, p > 0.05), Quick DASH (31.5 ± 21.81 vs. 28.79 ± 13.72, p = 0.85), ASES (82.53 ± 17.79 vs. 84.34 ± 15.24, p = 0.57), or the VAS (0.53 ± 1 vs. 0.56 ± 1.07, p = 0.14) at the final follow-up. No statistically significant differences were found in the radiographic parameters between the two groups. No statistically significant differences were found for the average degree of humeral and glenoid bone resorption either. Conclusions: The use of a short metaphyseal-socket stem can be considered a safe, effective, and feasible option in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treating proximal humerus fractures. Our results are encouraging, with no statistically significant differences identified between the proposed treatment and traditional long stems.

Shoulder arthroplasty for inflammatory arthritis is associated with higher rates of medical and surgical complications: a nationwide matched cohort analysis from 2016-2020

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory arthritis (IA) represents a less common indication for anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) than osteoarthritis (OA). The safety and efficacy of anatomic and reverse TSA in this population has not been as well studied compared to OA. We analyzed the differences in outcomes between IA and OA patients undergoing TSA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) from 2016-2020 were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. Inflammatory arthritis (IA) patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, diagnosis codes and compared to osteoarthritis controls. Patients were matched in a 1:8 fashion by age (±3 years), sex, race, and presence of pertinent comorbidities. Patient demographics, hospital factors, and patient comorbidities were compared. Multivariate regression was performed following matching to account for any residual confounding and 90-day complications were compared between the 2 cohorts. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were employed with significance set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Prior to matching, 5685 IA cases and 93,539 OA controls were identified. Patients with IA were more likely to be female, have prolonged length of stay and increased total costs (P < .0001). After matching and multivariate analysis, 4082 IA cases and 32,656 controls remained. IA patients were at increased risk of deep wound infection (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.38-7.16, P = .006), implant loosening (OR 4.11, 95% CI 1.17-14.40, P = .027), and mechanical complications (OR 6.34, 95% CI 1.05-38.20, P = .044), as well as a decreased risk of postoperative stiffness (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16-0.83, P = .002). Medically, IA patients were at increased risk of PE (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.52-5.77, P = .001) and acute blood loss anemia (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12-1.44, P < .0001).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Inflammatory arthritis represents a distinctly morbid risk profile compared to osteoarthritis patients with multiple increased surgical and postoperative medical complications in patients undergoing aTSA and rTSA. Surgeons should consider these potential complications and employ a multidisciplinary approach in preoperative risk stratification of IA undergoing shoulder replacement.

Treatment of 2-part, 3-part, and 4-part proximal humerus fractures from 2016 to 2020: A nationally-representative database

Introduction

Complex proximal humerus fractures pose challenges in elderly patients, as this common scenario can lead to unpredictable outcomes, regardless of treatment method. Given the evolving nature of the treatment for 3-and-4-part proximal humerus fractures, an epidemiological analysis offers a way to minimize the gap between appropriate understanding and effective intervention. As such, we aimed to i) evaluate the trends of nonoperative and operative management; and ii) compare the complication rates of ORIF to conversion ORIF (to RTSA).

Methods

We utilized a national, all-payer database to include patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for 2-part (n = 2783), 3-part (n = 2170), 4-part (n = 1087) proximal humerus fractures between April 2016 to December 2022. Patients who failed ORIF to RTSA included n = 108 for 2-part fractures, n = 123 for 3-part fractures, and n = 128 for 4-part fractures. We collected demographic and postoperative medical and surgical complications at 90-days, in addition to time-interval between ORIF and RTSA.

Results

The malunion and nonunion rates for ORIF between different types of proximal humerus fractures were similar (2-part fractures: 1.8 %, 4.7 %; 3-part fractures: 1.8 %, 3.5 %; 4-part fractures: 2.4 %, 3.7 %). The conversion rates of failed ORIF to RTSA were 1.9 %, 2.8 %, and 5.9 % for 2-part, 3-part, and 4-part fractures, respectively. The time interval from failed ORIF to RTSA was 190 days for 2-part fractures, 169 days for 3-part fractures, and 129 for 4-part fractures.

Conclusion

An epidemiological analysis of proximal humerus fractures by fracture type demonstrated an increase in RTSA for 2-part, 3-part, and 4-part fractures while nonoperative treatment showed no change from 2016 to 2020. Additional research is needed to determine which fractures are best treated operatively while maximizing outcomes. In the setting of complex proximal humerus fractures, several options seem feasible depending on patient demographic characteristics.

Midterm outcomes of primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of studies with minimum 5-year follow-up

Background

Excellent short-term outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been reported, but longer term outcomes in the existing literature are sparse and vary widely. The purpose of this study is to systematically assess the existing literature to quantify functional outcomes and complication rates after RSA at a minimum of five years of follow-up.

Methods

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses-compliant systematic literature search of the PubMed and Embase databases was undertaken. Studies reporting outcomes after primary RSA for nontrauma-related indications with a minimum of 5-year follow-up were included.

Results

Overall, 20 studies satisfied all inclusion criteria. This represented 1591 shoulders in 1556 patients (32.1% males), with a mean age of 70.2 ± 5.0 years and mean follow-up of 8.8 years, or 106.2 ± 30.1 months (60-243). At final follow-up, the mean reported Constant Murley score was 62.1 ± 5.0 (49.0-83.0). The mean adjusted Constant Murley score was 83.5 ± 12.5 (58-111.9). The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 81.8 ± 4.6, while the mean subjective shoulder value was 74.6 ± 6.4. Overall, 88% of patients rated their satisfaction as either good or very good. The range of active forward flexion, abduction, external, and internal rotation were respectively, 126° ± 13°, 106° ± 11°, 22° ± 11°, and 6° ± 2°. The overall rate of revision surgery was 4.9% (0%-45.5%). Regarding complications, the rate of prosthetic joint infection was 4.3% (0%-26.7%), shoulder dislocation was 3.7% (0%-20.4%), and acromial fracture was 2.0% (0%-8.8%). At final follow-up, 30.9% of shoulders had some degree of scapular notching.

Conclusion

This systematic review shows that RSA results in high satisfaction rates, good clinical outcomes, as well as modest complication and revision rates at minimum 5-year follow-up.

Primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fractures requires more revisions than for degenerative conditions 1 year after surgery: an analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

BACKGROUND

Although reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is considered a viable treatment strategy for proximal humeral fractures, there is an ongoing discussion of how its revision rate compares with indications performed in the elective setting. First, this study evaluated whether RTSA for fractures conveyed a higher revision rate than RTSA for degenerative conditions (osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, rotator cuff tear, or rheumatoid arthritis). Second, this study assessed whether there was a difference in patient-reported outcomes between these 2 groups following primary replacement. Finally, the results of conventional stem designs were compared with those of fracture-specific designs within the fracture group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective comparative cohort study with registry data from the Netherlands, generated prospectively between 2014 and 2020. Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) were included if they underwent primary RTSA for a fracture (<4 weeks after trauma), osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, rotator cuff tear, or rheumatoid arthritis, with follow-up until first revision, death, or the end of the study period. The primary outcome was the revision rate. The secondary outcomes were the Oxford Shoulder Score, EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) score, numerical rating scale score (pain at rest and during activity), recommendation score, and scores assessing change in daily functioning and change in pain.

RESULTS

This study included 8753 patients in the degenerative condition group (mean age, 74.3 ± 7.2 years) and 2104 patients in the fracture group (mean age, 74.3 ± 7.8 years). RTSA performed for fractures showed an early steep decline in survivorship: Adjusted for time, age, sex, and arthroplasty brand, the revision risk after 1 year was significantly higher in these patients than in those with degenerative conditions (hazard ratio [HR], 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-3.77). Over time, the HR steadily decreased, with an HR of 0.98 at year 6. Apart from the recommendation score (which was slightly better within the fracture group), there were no clinically relevant differences in the patient-reported outcome measures after 12 months. Patients who received conventional stems (n = 1137) did not have a higher likelihood of undergoing a revision procedure than those who received fracture-specific stems (n = 675) (HR, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-3.17).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing primary RTSA for fractures have a substantially higher likelihood of undergoing revision within the first year following the procedure than patients with degenerative conditions preoperatively. Although RTSA is regarded as a reliable and safe treatment option for fractures, surgeons should inform patients accordingly and incorporate this information in decision making when opting for head replacement surgery. There were no differences in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 groups and no differences in revision rates between conventional and fracture-specific stem designs.

No difference in complications between two-week vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes and complications after a two- vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review from our institutional database on 960 patients treated by primary rTSA between 2011 and 2021. Patients were separated into two cohorts of postoperative sling immobilization (a two-week and six-week group). Multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate what factors were associated with patients experiencing either a postoperative complication or requiring reoperation.

Results

A total of 276 patients were instructed to keep their operative arm in a sling for six weeks postoperatively, and 684 patients discontinued use at two weeks. There was no difference in postoperative complication rate (15.0% vs. 12.0%, P = .21), dislocation rate (P = .79), acromion stress fractures (P = .06), implant loosening (P = .15), and periprosthetic joint infections (P = .48) between the six- and two-week sling cohorts. In the immediate 90-day postoperative time period, no difference was seen in the reoperation rates (P = .73).

Discussion

Shorter duration of sling immobilization (two weeks) does not incur additional risk of complications compared to standard duration (six weeks) of sling immobilization following rTSA.

Disparities in postoperative total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes between Black and White patients

Background

Despite the rise in surgical volume for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) procedures, racial disparities exist in outcomes between White and Black populations. The purpose of this study was to compare 30-day postoperative complication rates between Black and White patients following TSA.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for all patients who underwent TSA between 2015 and 2019. Patient demographics and comorbidities were compared between cohorts using bivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for all significantly associated patient demographics and comorbidities, was used to identify associations between Black or African American race and postoperative complications.

Results

A total of 19,733 patients were included in the analysis, 18,669 (94.6%) patients in the White cohort and 1064 (5.4%) patients in the Black or African American cohort. Demographics and comorbidities that were significantly associated with Black or African American race were age 40-64 years (P < .001), body mass index ≥40 (P < .001), female gender (P < .001), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥3 (P < .001), smoking status (P < .001), non-insulin and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (P < .001), hypertension requiring medication (P < .001), disseminated cancer (P = .040), and operative duration ≥129 minutes (P = .002). Multivariate logistic regression identified Black or African American race to be independently associated with higher rates of readmission (odds ratio: 1.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.94; P = .025).

Conclusion

Black or African American race was independently associated with higher rates of 30-day readmission following TSA.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Nonagenarians - NIS-based study of perioperative and postoperative complications

Purpose

Our aim is to investigate the length of stay (LOS), cost of care (COC) and postoperative complications associated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in nonagenarians (people aged 90-99 years old).

Methods

We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to identify 59,925 patients who underwent RSA between 2016 and 2019, including 555 nonagenarians. We investigated the incidences of various medical and orthopedic postoperative complications in nonagenarians compared to their younger counterparts, as well as compared nonagenarians undergoing elective and non-elective surgery.

Results

Nonagenarians were less likely admitted for elective surgery (69.9% in nonagenarians vs 92.8% in controls, p < 0.001) and were subject to longer LOS (3.5 days in nonagenarians vs 1.89 days in controls, p < 0.001) and greater COC ($91,794.69 US in nonagenarians vs $79,574.12 US in controls, p < 0.001). Nonagenarians had increased incidences of hospital mortality (0.72% in nonagenarians vs 0.06% in controls, p < 0.001), pneumonia (1.44% in nonagenarians vs 0.37% in controls, p < 0.001), blood loss anemia (22.34% in nonagenarians vs 10.12% in controls, p < 0.001), and ARF (6.85% in nonagenarians vs 2.18% in controls, p < 0.001). Nonagenarians undergoing elective RSA had fewer complications than those requiring non-elective RSA.

Conclusion

Nonagenarians undergoing RSA are subject to increased LOS, COC, and postoperative complications. Despite this, we feel that the associated complications can be deemed acceptable and that with adequate preparation, the benefits of a successful RSA may outweigh the associated complications in elderly patients. This is important to aid clinicians and patients in making informed decisions for patient care and resource allocation, as well as highlights room for improvement in costs and hospital stay, as well as sheds light on persistent health disparities in orthopedic surgery.

Level of evidence

IV.

Update on Shoulder Arthroplasties with Emphasis on Imaging

Shoulder pain and dysfunction may significantly impact quality of life. If conservative measures fail, advanced disease is frequently treated with shoulder arthroplasty, which is currently the third most common joint replacement surgery following the hip and knee. The main indications for shoulder arthroplasty include primary osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, inflammatory arthritis, osteonecrosis, proximal humeral fracture sequelae, severely dislocated proximal humeral fractures, and advanced rotator cuff disease. Several types of anatomic arthroplasties are available, such as humeral head resurfacing and hemiarthroplasties, as well as total anatomic arthroplasties. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasties, which reverse the normal ball-and-socket geometry of the shoulder, are also available. Each of these arthroplasty types has specific indications and unique complications in addition to general hardware-related or surgery-related complications. Imaging-including radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and, occasionally, nuclear medicine imaging-has a key role in the initial pre-operative evaluation for shoulder arthroplasty, as well as in post-surgical follow-up. This review paper aims to discuss important pre-operative imaging considerations, including rotator cuff evaluation, glenoid morphology, and glenoid version, as well as to review post-operative imaging of the various types of shoulder arthroplasties, to include normal post-operative appearances as well as imaging findings of complications.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in upper extremity ambulators: a matched-cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Upper extremity ambulators (UEAs) who require prolonged use of assistive devices for mobility have a high incidence of shoulder pathology secondary to increased stress across the shoulder joint with upper extremity weight-bearing. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for rotator cuff arthropathy has historically been associated with increased complications in UEA, but more recent studies have shown more promising outcomes. The objective of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes and complication rates between these 2 groups to define the relative risk of RSA in the UEA population and identify opportunities to improve treatment outcomes.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review was performed in patients who underwent RSA at our institution by the senior author from 2004 to 2019. UEAs were defined as patients who used regular upper extremity assistive devices for community ambulation before initial consultation for the surgical extremity. Pre- and postoperative range of motion, visual analog scale scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Constant-Murley scores, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were measured at defined intervals. Complications including infection, instability, and need for revision surgery were also compared. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 159 RSA procedures (70 UEAs, 89 controls) were performed during the study period. On average, UEA patients had more preoperative pain and less shoulder function than controls, with statistically significant differences in visual analog scores (6.897 vs. 5.532, P = .0010) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (33.50 vs. 40.20, P = .0290), respectively. Despite the lower baseline values, UEA patients experienced excellent postoperative improvement, leading to similar postoperative pain and shoulder function except for a lower average forward flexion in the UEA group (127° vs. 135°, P = .0354). Notching and complication rates were also similar between the 2 groups, with notching rates of 59% and 50% and complication rates of 14.3% and 13.5% in the UEA and control groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RSA in the UEA population can achieve similar pain and functional outcomes as compared with age-matched controls without a significant increase in complication rates; however, further studies are required to assess long-term comparative outcomes in this challenging patient population.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fractures and Sequalae Compared to Non-Fracture Indications: A Matched Cohort Analysis of Outcome and Complications

Background: With the increase in utility and popularity of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) within the last decades, indications for RTSA have expanded. As well as the established indications such as cuff tear arthropathy and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, RTSA for complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients has been proven to be a reliable treatment option. Methods: A prospectively enrolled RTSA database of 1457 RTSAs implanted between September 2005 and November 2020 was reviewed. Patients treated with RTSA for a complex proximal humerus fracture and fracture sequalae (F-RTSA) were 1:1 matched with a group of patients who were treated electively with RTSA for indications other than a fracture (E-RTSA). Matching criteria included sex, age, length of follow-up and body mass index. Evaluation after a minimum of 2 years follow-up included evaluation of the absolute and relative Constant–Murley score (aCS; rCS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), range of motion (ROM) assessment and complications. Results: Each of the matched cohorts comprised 134 patients with a mean follow-up of 58 ± 41 months for the fracture group and 58 ± 36 months for the elective group. The mean age for both groups was 69 ± 11 years in the F-RTSA and 70 ± 9 years for the E-RTSA group. There were no significant differences in clinical outcome measures including aCS, rCS and SSV (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in mean active external rotation with 20° ± 18° in the F-RTSA group compared with 25° ± 19° in the E-RTSA group (p = 0.017). The complication rate was not significantly different, with 41 complications in 36 shoulders in the F-RTSA and 40 complications in 32 shoulders in the E-RTSA group (p = 0.73). The main complication for the F-RTSA group was dislocation of the greater tuberosity (6%), whereas acromial fractures (9%) were the leading complication in the E-RTSA group. There was also no significant difference in revision rate comparing F-RTSA with E-RTSA (10% vs. 14%; p = 0.25). Conclusions: RTSA for complex proximal humeral fractures and its sequalae leads to a comparable clinical outcome as that for patients treated electively with RTSA for indications other than fracture. There was, however, a significant difference in active external rotation, with inferior rotation in patients undergoing RTSA for fracture. This valuable information can help in requesting informed consent of patients with proximal humeral fractures.

Feasibility and Radiological Outcome of Minimally Invasive Locked Plating of Proximal Humeral Fractures in Geriatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures are common injuries in the elderly. Locked plating showed high complication and reoperation rates at first. However, with second-generation implants and augmentation, minimally invasive locked plating might be a viable alternative to arthroplasty or conservative treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients with proximal humerus fractures treated between 2014 and 2020 with locked plating. All patients over 60 years of age who underwent surgery for a proximal humerus fracture with plate osteosynthesis (NCB, Philos, or Philos with cement) during the specified period were included. Pathological fractures, intramedullary nailing, or arthroplasty were excluded. Primary outcome measurements included secondary displacement and surgical complications. Secondary outcomes comprised function and mortality within one year.

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients (mean age 75.6 +/- 8.9 years; 194 women and 55 men) were included in the study. No significant difference in the AO fracture classification could be found. Ninety-two patients were surgically treated with first-generation locked plating (NCB, Zimmer Biomet, Wayne Township, IN, USA), 113 patients with second-generation locked plating (Philos, Depuy Synthes, Wayne Township, IN, USA), and 44 patients with cement-augmented second-generation locked plating (Philos, Traumacem V+, Depuy Synthes). A 6-week radiological follow-up was completed for 189 patients. In all groups, X-rays were performed one day after surgery, and these showed no differences concerning the head shaft angle between the groups. The mean secondary varus dislocation (decrease of the head shaft angle) after six weeks for first-generation locked plating was 6.6 ± 12° (n = 72), for second-generation locked plating 4.4 ± 6.5 (n = 83), and for second-generation with augmentation 1.9 ± 3.7 (n = 35) with a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.012). Logistic regression showed a significant dependency for secondary dislocation for the type of treatment (p = 0.038), age (p = 0.01), and preoperative varus fracture displacement (p = 0.033). Significantly fewer surgical complications have been observed in the augmented second-generation locked plating group (NCB: 26.3%; Philos 21.5%; Philos-augmented 8.6%; p = 0.015). Range of motion was documented in 122 out of 209 patients after 3 months. In the Philos-augmented group, 50% of the patients achieved at least 90° anteversion and abduction, which was only about a third of the patients in the other 2 groups (NCB 34.8%, n = 46; Philos 35.8%, n = 56; augmented-Philos 50.0%, n = 20; p = 0.429).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive locked plating is still a valuable treatment option for geriatric patients. With augmentation and modern implants, the complication rate is low and comparable to those of reverse shoulder arthroplasty reported in the literature, even in the challenging group of elderly patients.