A new all-suture tension band tape fixation technique for simple olecranon fractures versus conventional tension band wire fixation: a comparative biomechanics study

Midterm outcomes of suture anchor fixation for displaced olecranon fractures

BACKGROUND

Displaced olecranon fractures constitute a challenging problem for elbow surgeons. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of suture anchor fixation for treating patients with displaced olecranon fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for all consecutive patients with displaced olecranon fractures treated with suture anchor fixation with at least 2 years of clinical follow-up. Surgical repair was performed acutely in all cases with nonmetallic suture anchors in a double-row configuration utilizing suture augmentation via the triceps tendon. Osseous union and perioperative complications were uniformly assessed.

RESULTS

Suture anchor fixation was performed on 17 patients with displaced olecranon fractures. Functional outcome scores were collected from 12 patients (70.6%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 65.6 years, and the mean follow-up was 5.6 years. Sixteen of 17 patients (94%) achieved osseous union in an acceptable position. No hardware-related complications or fixation failure occurred. Mean postoperative shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH) score was 3.8±6.9, and mean Oxford Elbow Score was 47.5±1.0, with nine patients (75%) achieving a perfect score.

CONCLUSIONS

Suture anchor fixation of displaced olecranon fractures resulted in excellent midterm functional outcomes. Additionally, this technique resulted in high rates of osseous union without any hardware-related complications or fixation failures. Level of evidence: IV.

Anterolateral Acromioplasty Reduces Gliding Resistance Between the Supraspinatus Tendon and the Coracoacromial Arch in a Cadaveric Model

Purpose

To investigate the gliding resistance dynamics between the supraspinatus (SSP) tendon and the coracoacromial arch, both before and after subacromial decompression (anterolateral acromioplasty) and acromion resection (acromionectomy).

Methods

Using 4 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders, acromion shapes were classified (2 type I and 2 type III according to Bigliani). Subacromial bursa and coracoacromial ligament maintenance replicated physiologic sliding conditions. Gliding resistance was measured during glenohumeral abduction (0° to 60°) in internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER). Peak gliding resistance between the SSP tendon and the coracoacromial arch was determined and compared between intact, anterolateral acromioplasty, and acromionectomy.

Results

Peak SSP gliding resistance during abduction in an intact shoulder was significantly higher in IR than in ER (4.1 vs 2.1 N, P < .001). The mean peak SSP gliding resistance during 0° to 60° glenohumeral abduction in IR in the intact condition was significantly higher compared with the subacromial decompression condition (4.1 vs 2.8 N, P = .021) and with the acromionectomy condition (4.1 vs 0.9 N, P < .001). During 0° to 60° glenohumeral abduction in ER, mean peak SSP gliding resistance in the intact condition was not significantly different compared with the subacromial decompression condition (2.1 vs 2.0 N, P = .999). The 2 specimens with a hooked (i.e. type III) acromion showed significantly higher mean peak SSP gliding resistance during glenohumeral abduction in IR and ER when compared with the 2 specimens with a flat (i.e. type I) acromion (IR: 5.8 vs 3.0 N, P = .006; ER: 2.8 vs 1.4 N, P = .001).

Conclusions

In this cadaveric study, peak gliding resistance between the SSP tendon and the coracoacromial arch during combined abduction and IR was significantly reduced after anterolateral acromioplasty and was significantly higher in specimens with a hooked acromion.

Clinical Relevance

The clinical benefit of subacromial decompression remains unclear. This study suggests that anterolateral acromioplasty might reduce supraspinatus gliding resistance in those with a hooked acromion and in the typical "impingement" position.

Biomechanical comparison of canine median sternotomy closure using suture tape and orthopedic wire cerclage

OBJECTIVE

To compare the mechanical properties of suture tape and orthopedic wire cerclage in an ex vivo canine median sternotomy model.

STUDY DESIGN

Ex vivo.

ANIMALS

Twelve large-breed canine cadaveric sternums.

METHODS

Median sternotomies were performed, leaving the manubrium intact. The specimens were randomly assigned to group W (20-gauge stainless steel orthopedic wire cerclage in a figure-of-eight pattern) or group ST (suture tape in a figure-of-eight pattern). Each specimen was laterally distracted until failure using an electrodynamic materials-testing system.

RESULTS

No differences were observed for displacement, yield load, maximum load, implant failure between the groups. The orthopedic wire construct was stiffer than the suture tape construct.

CONCLUSION

Suture tape was biomechanically similar to orthopedic wire cerclage for sternotomy closure in dogs, although wire constructs were stiffer.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Suture tape may represent an alternative to cerclage wire for sternotomy closure in dogs. Additional studies evaluating its clinical use are needed.

Biomechanical comparison of tension band suture fixation and tension band wiring in olecranon fractures

PURPOSE

Traditional tension band wire fixation (TBWF) of olecranon fractures is associated with high revision rates due to implant-related complications. The purpose of the study was to compare the strength of fixation in olecranon fractures between TBWF and an all-suture based technique.

METHODS

A transverse fracture was created in 20 paired fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows. Fractures were randomly (alternating right-left) assigned for fixation with either tension band suture fixation (TBSF) or TBWF. The elbow was fixed in 90° of flexion and underwent cycling loading by pulling the triceps tendon to 300 N for 200 cycles. Fracture displacement was optically recorded using digital image correlation (DIC). Finally, load-to-failure was assessed by a monotonic pull to 1000 N and failure mechanism was recorded.

RESULTS

Two specimens in the TBSF group were excluded from the cycling loading analysis due to technical difficulties with the DIC. After cyclic loading, median (min-max) fracture displacement was 0.28 mm (0.10-0.44) in the TBSF group and 0.18 mm (0.00-1.48) in the TBWF group (p = 0.315). No difference was found between the two groups in the repeated measures analysis of variance (p = 0.329). In the load-to-failure test, 6/10 specimens failed in the TBSF group (median load-to-failure 791 N) vs. 8/10 in the TBWF group (median load-to-failure 747 N). The TBSF constructs failed due to fracture of the dorsal cortex, suture breakage or triceps failure. The TBWF constructs failed due to breakage of the wire.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in fixation strength between the TBWF and TBSF constructs. Our findings suggest TBSF to be a feasible alternative to TBWF and we hypothesize that a non-metallic implant may have fewer implant-related complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Basic science study.

Biomechanical Comparison of Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Techniques: Extracortical Single-Button Inlay Fixation Versus Intracortical Double-Button Onlay Anatomic Footprint Fixation

BACKGROUND

Extracortical single-button (SB) inlay repair is a commonly used distal biceps tendon technique. However, complications (eg, neurovascular injury) and nonanatomic repairs have led to the development of intracortical fixation techniques.

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical stability of extracortical SB repair with an anatomic intracortical double-button (DB) repair technique.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

The distal biceps tendon was transected in 18 cadaveric elbows from 9 donors. One elbow of each donor was randomly assigned to the extracortical SB or anatomic DB group. Both groups were cyclically loaded with 60 N over 1000 cycles between 90° of flexion and full extension. The elbow was then fixed in 90° of flexion and the repair construct loaded to failure. Gap formation and construct stiffness during cyclic loading and ultimate load to failure were analyzed.

RESULTS

When compared with the extracortical SB technique after 1000 cycles, the anatomic DB technique showed significantly less gap formation (mean ± SD, 2.7 ± 0.8 vs 1.5 ± 0.9 mm; P = .017) and significantly more construct stiffness (87.4 ± 32.7 vs 119.9 ± 31.6 N/mm; P = .023). Ultimate load to failure was not significantly different between the groups (277 ± 93 vs 285 ± 135 N; P = .859). The failure mode in the anatomic DB group was significantly different from that of the extracortical SB technique (P = .002) and was due to fracture avulsion of the cortical button in 7 of 9 specimens (vs none in the SB group).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that the intracortical DB technique produces equivalent or superior biomechanical performance to that of the SB technique. The DB technique may offer a clinically viable alternative to the SB repair technique.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study suggests, at worst, an equivalent and, at best, a superior biomechanical performance of intracortical anatomic DB footprint repair at the time of surgery. However, the mode of failure suggests that this technique should not be used in patients with poor bone quality.

Olecranon Fractures: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Olecranon fractures account for 10% of all elbow fractures and are more likely to result from a low-energy injury. A displaced fracture with a stable ulnohumeral joint (Mayo type 2) is the most common type of injury.

»

The management of an isolated olecranon fracture is based on patient factors (age, functional demand, and if medically fit to undergo surgery) and fracture characteristics including displacement, fragmentation, and elbow stability.

»

Nonoperative management can be successfully used in undisplaced fractures (Mayo type 1) and in displaced fractures (Mayo type 2) in frail patients with lower functional demands.

»

Patients with displaced olecranon fractures with a stable ulnohumeral joint without significant articular surface fragmentation (Mayo type 2A) can be managed with tension band wiring, plate osteosynthesis (PO), intramedullary fixation, or suture repair.

»

PO is advocated for multifragmentary fractures and fractures that are associated with ulnohumeral instability. It is essential to consider the variable anatomy of the proximal ulna during surgery.