Comparing bone shape models from deep learning processing of magnetic resonance imaging to computed tomography-based models

Cascade learning in multi-task encoder-decoder networks for concurrent bone segmentation and glenohumeral joint clinical assessment in shoulder CT scans

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative condition that affects bones and cartilage, often leading to structural changes, including osteophyte formation, bone density loss, and the narrowing of joint spaces. Over time, this process may disrupt the glenohumeral (GH) joint functionality, requiring a targeted treatment. Various options are available to restore joint functions, ranging from conservative management to surgical interventions, depending on the severity of the condition. This work introduces an innovative deep learning framework to process shoulder CT scans. It features the semantic segmentation of the proximal humerus and scapula, the 3D reconstruction of bone surfaces, the identification of the GH joint region, and the staging of three common osteoarthritic-related conditions: osteophyte formation (OS), GH space reduction (JS), and humeroscapular alignment (HSA). Each condition was stratified into multiple severity stages, offering a comprehensive analysis of shoulder bone structure pathology. The pipeline comprised two cascaded CNN architectures: 3D CEL-UNet for segmentation and 3D Arthro-Net for threefold classification. A retrospective dataset of 571 CT scans featuring patients with various degrees of GH osteoarthritic-related pathologies was used to train, validate, and test the pipeline. Root mean squared error and Hausdorff distance median values for 3D reconstruction were 0.22 mm and 1.48 mm for the humerus and 0.24 mm and 1.48 mm for the scapula, outperforming state-of-the-art architectures and making it potentially suitable for a PSI-based shoulder arthroplasty preoperative plan context. The classification accuracy for OS, JS, and HSA consistently reached around 90% across all three categories. The computational time for the entire inference pipeline was less than 15 s, showcasing the framework's efficiency and compatibility with orthopedic radiology practice. The achieved reconstruction and classification accuracy, combined with the rapid processing time, represent a promising advancement towards the medical translation of artificial intelligence tools. This progress aims to streamline the preoperative planning pipeline, delivering high-quality bone surfaces and supporting surgeons in selecting the most suitable surgical approach according to the unique patient joint conditions.

Artificial intelligence demonstrates potential to enhance orthopaedic imaging across multiple modalities: A systematic review

Purpose

While several artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted medical imaging applications are reported in the recent orthopaedic literature, comparison of the clinical efficacy and utility of these applications is currently lacking. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of AI applications in orthopaedic imaging, focusing on their impact on diagnostic accuracy, image segmentation and operational efficiency across various imaging modalities.

Methods

Based on the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases was performed, using combinations of keywords and MeSH descriptors ('AI', 'ML', 'deep learning', 'orthopaedic surgery' and 'imaging') from inception to March 2024. Included were studies published between September 2018 and February 2024, which evaluated machine learning (ML) model effectiveness in improving orthopaedic imaging. Studies with insufficient data regarding the output variable used to assess the reliability of the ML model, those applying deterministic algorithms, unrelated topics, protocol studies, and other systematic reviews were excluded from the final synthesis. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tool and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool were applied for the assessment of bias among the included studies.

Results

The 53 included studies reported the use of 11.990.643 images from several diagnostic instruments. A total of 39 studies reported details in terms of the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), while both accuracy and sensitivity were documented across 15 studies. Precision was reported by 14, specificity by nine, and the F1 score by four of the included studies. Three studies applied the area under the curve (AUC) method to evaluate ML model performance. Among the studies included in the final synthesis, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) emerged as the most frequently applied category of ML models, present in 17 studies (32%).

Conclusion

The systematic review highlights the diverse application of AI in orthopaedic imaging, demonstrating the capability of various machine learning models in accurately segmenting and analysing orthopaedic images. The results indicate that AI models achieve high performance metrics across different imaging modalities. However, the current body of literature lacks comprehensive statistical analysis and randomized controlled trials, underscoring the need for further research to validate these findings in clinical settings.

Level of evidence

Systematic Review; Level of evidence IV.

Leveraging digital twins for improved orthopaedic evaluation and treatment

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to explore the potential of digital twin technologies in orthopaedics and to evaluate how their integration with artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) can improve orthopaedic evaluation and treatment. This review addresses key applications of digital twins, including surgical planning, patient-specific outcome prediction, augmented reality-assisted surgery and simulation-based surgical training.

Methods

Existing studies on digital twins in various domains, including engineering, biomedical and orthopaedics are reviewed. We also reviewed advancements in AI and DL relevant to digital twins. We focused on identifying key benefits, challenges and future directions for the implementation of digital twins in orthopaedic practice.

Results

The review highlights that digital twins offer significant potential to revolutionise orthopaedic care by enabling precise surgical planning, real-time outcome prediction and enhanced training. Digital twins can model patient-specific anatomy using advanced imaging techniques and dynamically update with real-time data, providing valuable insights during surgery and postoperative care. However, challenges such as the need for large-scale data sets, technological limitations and integration issues must be addressed to fully realise these benefits.

Conclusion

Digital twins represent a promising frontier in orthopaedic research and practice, with the potential to improve patient outcomes and enhance surgical precision. To enable widespread adoption, future research must focus on overcoming current challenges and further refining the integration of digital twins with AI and DL technologies.

Level of Evidence

Level V.

Morphometric and clinical comparison of MRI-based synthetic CT to conventional CT of the hip in children

BACKGROUND

MRI-based synthetic CT (sCT) generates CT-like images from MRI data.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate equivalence, inter- and intraobserver reliability, and image quality of sCT compared to conventional (cCT) for assessing hip morphology and maturity in pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients <21 years old with cCT and 3T MRI of the hips/pelvis. A dual-echo gradient-echo sequence was used to generate sCT via a commercially available post-processing software (BoneMRI v1.5 research version, MRIguidance BV, Utrecht, NL). Two pediatric musculoskeletal radiologists measured seven morphologic hip parameters. 3D surface distances between cCT and sCT were computed. Physeal status was established at seven locations with cCT as reference standard. Images were qualitatively scored on a 5-point Likert scale regarding diagnostic quality, signal-to-noise ratio, clarity of bony margin, corticomedullary differentiation, and presence and severity of artifacts. Quantitative evaluation of Hounsfield units (HU) was performed in bone, muscle, and fat tissue. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were measured by intraclass correlation coefficients. The cCT-to-sCT intermodal agreement was assessed via Bland-Altman analysis. The equivalence between modalities was tested using paired two one-sided tests. The quality parameter scores of each imaging modality were compared via Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For tissue-specific HU measurements, mean absolute error and mean percentage error values were calculated using the cCT as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight hips in 19 patients were included (16.6 ± 3 years, range 9.9-20.9; male = 5). cCT- and sCT-based morphologic measurements demonstrated good to excellent inter- and intraobserver correlation (0.77

CONCLUSION

sCT is equivalent to cCT for the assessment of hip morphology, physeal status, and radiodensity assessment in pediatric patients.

Collapse

Key Words

• Hip imaging
• Hip morphology
• Hounsfield units
• MRI based
• Quality
• Synthetic CT

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Male
• Child
• Female
• Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
• Prospective Studies
• Reproducibility of Results
• Adolescent
• Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
• Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging
• Child, Preschool
• Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Jade Iwasaka-Neder Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
M Alejandra Bedoya Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
James Connors Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
Simon Warfield Computational Radiology Laboratory, Boston Children's Hospital, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
Sarah D Bixby Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse