Comparison of Growing Rod Instrumentation Versus Serial Cast Treatment for Early-Onset Scoliosis

Safety and efficacy of waterproof casting for early onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

The efficacy of traditional Mehta casting in the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) is well-established. However, waterproof casting has not been previously described. Inherent advantages of waterproof casting include clearance for bathing/swimming, avoiding cast holidays, and improved family satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of waterproof serial casting at controlling curve progression in EOS.

METHODS

The current study is an IRB-approved Level IV retrospective consecutive cohort of EOS patients who underwent a serial 75% body weight traction-elongation-flexion Mehta cast protocol with waterproof cast padding. The addition of 3-point apical translation with stockinettes was utilized during casting. Bracing was initiated after correction < 15° or 1 year of serial casting.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients at mean age 21.6 months, with pre-cast Cobb angle 52.3° (R: 35°-82°), underwent serial waterproof casting. In-cast correction index was 64%; for post-cast, Cobb angle was 18.6°. At mean 5.6 years follow-up (R: 2.3-8.9 years), 82% successfully avoided surgical intervention, 53% maintained correction < 25°, and 29% are considered "cured". 3/17 (18%) underwent a 2nd round of casting, and a total of 3/17 (18%) ultimately required surgery at 6.2 years post-casting. No major cast-related complications, decubiti, or cast holidays were encountered.

CONCLUSION

Serial waterproof casting is safe and efficacious in EOS when compared to published results of traditional Mehta casting. Of 17 patients with mean pre-cast Cobb 52.3°, 82% successfully avoided surgery and 53% maintained mild curves < 25° magnitude at 5.6 years follow-up. No major complications or skin decubiti occurred, and advantages include clearance for bathing and avoidance of need for cast holidays during treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Physician collections are 71% less for early onset scoliosis casting than for growing rod instrumentation: A retrospective cohort study

Growing rod (GR) instrumentation and the elongation, derotation, and flexion (EDF) casting technique are 2 alternatives for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. Our purpose was to investigate the cost of these treatment options. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with early-onset scoliosis treated at 2 institutions from 2007 to 2014 with either GR instrumentation or EDF casting. Patients with <2 years of follow-up were excluded. Physician and hospital charges and collections, total procedures, and procedure times until final follow-up or time of fusion were compared. Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria; 8 in the GR group and 11 in the EDF casting group. There were no significant differences between the groups in age (P = .23), public versus private insurance (P = 1.0), or major curve (P = .21) at the initiation of treatment. Excluding final fusion, the EDF casting patients had an average of 2.1 (range: 0.7-6.6) procedures/year while the GR patients had an average of 1.5 (range: 0.8-2.7) procedures/year. The average procedure time for the EDF group was 104.2 minutes; the average procedure time for the GR group, excluding the index procedure, was 62.40 minutes (P = .001). Physician charges were 85% less for the EDF group (EDF= $1892.75, GR= $12,354.53, P < .001). Physician collections were 71% less for the EDF group (EDF= $731.10, GR= $2554.88, P = .001). Hospital charges and collections were similar between the groups (P = .82, P = .42). Physician charges for casting were approximately 18% of that of GRs. Compared to GRs, physician collections were 71% less for EDF casting patients per year.

Comparison of surgical interventions for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Several growth-preserving surgical techniques are employed in the management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The authors' objective was to compare the use of traditional growing rods (TGRs), magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs), Shilla growth guidance techniques, and vertically expanding prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTRs) for the management of EOS.

METHODS

A systematic review of electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane, was performed. Outcomes of interest included correction of Cobb angle, T1-S1 distance, and complication rate, including alignment, hardware failure and infection, and planned and unplanned reoperation rates. The percent changes and 95% CIs were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 67 studies were identified, which included 2021 patients. Of these, 1169 (57.8%) patients underwent operations with TGR, 178 (8.8%) Shilla growth guidance system, 448 (22.2%) MCGR, and 226 (11.1%) VEPTR system. The mean ± SD age of the cohort was 6.9 ± 1.2 years. The authors found that the Shilla technique provided the most significant improvement in coronal Cobb angle immediately after surgery (mean [95% CI] 64.3% [61.4%-67.2%]), whereas VEPTR (27.6% [22.7%-33.6%]) performed significantly worse. VEPTR also performed significantly worse than the other techniques at final follow-up. The techniques also provided comparable gains in T1-S1 height immediately postoperatively (mean [95% CI] 10.7% [8.4%-13.0%]); however, TGR performed better at final follow-up (21.4% [18.7%-24.1%]). Complications were not significantly different among the patients who underwent the Shilla, TGR, MCGR, and VEPTR techniques, except for the rate of infections. The TGR technique had the lowest rate of unplanned reoperations (mean [95% CI] 15% [10%-23%] vs 24% [19%-29%]) but the highest number of planned reoperations per patient (5.31 [4.83-5.82]). The overall certainty was also low, with a high risk of bias across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggested that the Shilla technique was associated with a greater early coronal Cobb angle correction, whereas use of VEPTR was associated with a lower correction rate at any time point. TGR offered the most significant height gain at final follow-up. The complication rates were comparable across all surgical techniques. The optimal surgical approach should be tailored to individual patients, taking into consideration the strengths and limitations of each option.

Posterior-only Resection of Single Hemivertebrae With 2-Level Versus >2-Level Fusion: Can We Improve Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of congenital scoliosis (CS) patients undergoing hemivertebra (HV) resection surgery with a 2-level fusion versus a >2-level fusion are unclear. We hypothesized that CS patients undergoing HV resection and a >2-level fusion have decreased curve progression and reoperation rates compared with 2-level fusions.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a multicenter scoliosis database. Fifty-three CS patients (average age 4.5, range 1.2 to 10.9 y) at index surgery were included. Radiographic and surgical parameters, complications, as well as revision surgery rates were tracked at a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients had a 2-level fusion while 27 patients had a >2-level fusion with similar age and body mass index between groups. The HV was located in the lumbar spine for 69% (18/26) 2-level fusions and 30% (8/27) >2-level fusions ( P =0.006). Segmental HV scoliosis curve was smaller in 2-level fusions compared to >2-level fusions preoperatively (38 vs. 50 degrees, P =0.016) and at follow-up (25 vs. 34 degrees, P =0.038). Preoperative T2-T12 (28 vs. 41 degrees, P =0.013) and segmental kyphosis (11 vs. 23 degrees, P =0.046) were smaller in 2-level fusions, but did not differ significantly at postoperative follow-up (32 vs. 39 degrees, P =0.22; 13 vs. 11 degrees, P =0.64, respectively). Furthermore, the 2 groups did not significantly differ in terms of surgical complications (27% vs. 22%, P =0.69; 2-level fusion vs. >2-level fusion, respectively), unplanned revision surgery rate (23% vs. 22%, 0.94), growing rod placement or extension of spinal fusion (15% vs. 15%, P =0.95), or health-related quality of life per the EOS-Questionnaire 24 (EOSQ-24). Comparison of patients with or without the need for growing rod placement or posterior spinal fusion revealed no significant differences in all parameters analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-level and >2-level fusions can control congenital curves successfully. No differences existed in curve correction, proximal junctional kyphosis or complications between short and long-level fusion after HV resection. Both short and long level fusions are viable options and generate similar risk of revision. The decision should be individualized by patient and surgeon.

Elongation-Derotation-Flexion Casting Treatment of Early-Onset Progressive Scoliosis in Skeletal Dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Early-onset scoliosis in children with skeletal dysplasia is progressive, contributing to cardiopulmonary restrictive disease. Serial elongation-derotation-flexion (EDF) casting, used in other etiologies of scoliosis to delay curve progression, may be beneficial in maximizing spine growth. Our hypothesis is serial EDF casting can be safely used as a temporary alternative to surgery, delaying progression and preserving growth, to treat scoliosis in skeletal dysplasia.

METHODS

All patients with skeletal dysplasia treated at a single institution with serial EDF casting for scoliosis were reviewed retrospectively. Radiographic parameters: Cobb angle of major and minor curves, curve location, thoracic height, thoracolumbar height, space available for lung, and rib vertebra angle difference were measured before casting (C1), in first casting (C2), in last casting (C3), and out of last casting (C4). Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) values were monitored and recorded during the casting application.

RESULTS

Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria (mean 9.7 castings). The mean duration of EDF serial casting was 35 months. The mean major Cobb angles were 54 degrees° (C1), 30 degrees (C2), 37 degrees (C3), and 49 degrees (C4) with no statistically significant differences. The mean minor Cobb angles were 35 degrees (C1), 25 degrees (C2), 33 degrees (C3), and 51 degrees (C4) with no statistically significant differences. The mean thoracic heights were 130 mm (C1), 155 mm (C2), 173 mm (C3), and 160 mm (C4). The 19-mm mean difference between C2 and C3 represents spinal growth. The PIP-1, PIP-2, and PIP-3 mean values were 15, 27, and 18 cmH2O, respectively. Changes in PIP-1 and PIP-2 and PIP-2 and PIP-3 were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Serial EDF casting can delay surgical scoliosis correction in children younger than 7 years with a diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia. Our study showed that serial casting controls progression of the major curve and allows longitudinal growth of the spine with possible expansion of lung volume for nearly 3 years. During cast application, PIP increased with molding and traction, and improved until windowing and trimming of the cast.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-retrospective study.

The conservative treatment of congenital scoliosis with hemivertebra: Report of three cases

INTRODUCTION

Scoliosis is the most common type of congenital vertebral disease. This spinal disorder may be due to a failure of formation, segmentation, or a combination thereof. Complete failure of formation causes hemivertebra which can lead to unbalanced growth and deformation. Statistically, 25% of congenital curves do not evolve, 25% progress slightly, while the remaining 50% develop quickly and require treatment. Hemivertebrae can be divided into three types: non-segmented, semi-segmented, and fully-segmented. The fully-segmented types are most likely to progress. Hemivertebra in the thoracolumbar region shows higher rates of progression compared with those in the lumbar area. The treatment may be either conservative or surgical. In general, bracing is not recommended in short and rigid curves, although it may help process secondary curves.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of bracing in congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra.

CASES PRESENTATION

Searching in our database, we found three cases of patients with congenital scoliosis due to fully-segmented hemivertebra. The first of them was 6 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L5, determining an L1-L5 (S1) lumbar curve. The second one was 10 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L2 and a T11-L4 (L5 sacralized) thoracolumbar curve. The last one was 3 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L3 (in six lumbar bodies), determining a thoracolumbar curve T12-L4.

RESULTS

We utilized a Milwaukee brace for the first patient, a Boston brace for the second patient, and a Progressive Action Short Brace (PASB) for the third patient. At the beginning of the treatment, the Cobb angles measured 23°, 53°, and 25°, respectively. During treatment, the Cobb angles measured 22°, 35°, and 15°, respectively. At the end of treatment, the Cobb angles measured 18°, 45°, and 12°, respectively. At long-term follow-up, the curves measured 20°, 45°, and 12° Cobb angles, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparing our cases with those found in the literature we can confirm the ability of conservative treatment to change the natural history of congenital lumbar scoliosis due to failure of formation. From our experience, in all cases of CS with hemivertebra, before considering a surgical approach, conservative treatment should be implemented as early as possible without waiting for the progressive deformation of the adjacent normal vertebrae.

Clinical Results of Corrective Cast and Brace Treatment for Early-onset Scoliosis: The Effectiveness of Long-term Cast Treatment That Extends into Children's Schooldays

BACKGROUND

Cast and brace treatment is a conservative treatment for early-onset scoliosis (EOS). We analyzed the clinical results of this treatment when extended into patients' schooldays.

METHODS

Twenty-two children with EOS underwent alternatively repetitive cast and brace treatment (ARCBT). Cast was applied under general anesthesia and remained for some weeks, and the brace was continuously worn, which was repeatedly applied when scoliosis progressed. The change in the major curve angle, requirement for surgical intervention, and complications of ARCBT were analyzed.

RESULTS

Six patients had idiopathic scoliosis (IS), 9 had syndromic scoliosis (SS), and 7 had neuromuscular scoliosis. Cast treatment started at 4.9±2.1 years of age, and the patients were followed up for 8.3 years. The average total number of cast applications was 5.5 per patient. The mean major scoliosis angle was 45.4±12.5 degrees at the first visit; this was corrected to 26.5±8.7 degrees at the first cast application and progressed to 75.4±22.1 degrees at the final visit. Nine patients whose scoliosis progressed finally underwent surgery. The mean age at surgery was 11.0 years (range, 8.8 to 13.1 y), and the mean period from first cast application to surgery was 6.1 years (range, 5.0 to 8.9 y). Four patients' IS rapidly progressed after 9 years of age, and all of them underwent final fusion surgery with a correction rate of 56.9%. Among patients with SS, 1 final fusion, and 2 growth-friendly surgeries were performed at a mean age of 9.2 years; the correction rate was 21.5%. Among patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, 2 final fusion surgeries were performed at a mean age of 11.3 years; the correction rate was 30.7%. The cast-related complication rate was 5.0%, and most complications were skin problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term ARCBT extended into schooldays might be effective for IS. This should be considered as a time-saving treatment option for EOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

Complications in growth-friendly spinal surgeries for early-onset scoliosis: Literature review

BACKGROUND

The treatments for early-onset scoliosis (EOS), defined as curvature of the spine with onset before 10 years of age, continue to pose a great challenge for pediatric orthopedics. The treatment goals for EOS include minimizing spinal deformity while maximizing thoracic volume and pulmonary function. Different surgical techniques have different advantages and drawbacks; however, the two major concerns in the management of EOS are repeated surgeries and complications.

AIM

To review the current literature to assess the safety of EOS surgical treatment in terms of the rate of complications and unplanned surgeries.

METHODS

In January 2021 two independent reviewers systematically searched three electronic medical databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase) for relevant articles. Every step of the review was done according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Due to the heterogeneity of articles and topics after data analysis, a descriptive (synthetic) analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 2136 articles were found. Forty articles were included in this systematic review, after applying our inclusion and exclusion criteria. EOS surgery has a varying but high rate of complications. The most frequent complications were categorized as implant (54%), general (17%), wound (15%) and alignment (12%). The rate of complications might have been even higher than reported, as some authors do not report all types of complications. About 54% of patients required unplanned surgeries due to complications, which comprised 15% of all surgeries.

CONCLUSION

The literature concerning the definitions, collection, and interpretation of data regarding EOS surgery complications is often difficult to interpret. This creates problems in the comparison, analysis, and improvement of spine surgery practice. Additionally, this observation indicates that data on the incidence of complications can be underestimated, and should be interpreted with caution. Awareness of the high rate of complications of EOS surgery is crucial, and an optimal strategy for prevention should become a priority.

Understanding the implant performance of magnetically controlled growing spine rods: a review article

PURPOSE

Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS) (defined as a curvature of the spine ≥ 10° with onset before 10 years of age) if not properly treated, can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Traditionally Growing Rods (TGRs), implants fixated to the spine and extended every 6-8 months by surgery, are considered the gold standard, but Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods (MCGRs) avoid multiple surgeries. While the potential benefit of outpatient distraction procedure with MCGR is huge, concerns still remain about its risks, up to the release of a Medical Device Alert (MDA) by the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) advising not to implant MCGRs until further notice. The aim of this literature review is to (1) give an overview on the use of MCGRs and (2) identify what is currently understood about the surgical, implant and patient factors associated with the use of MCGRs.

METHODS

Systematic literature review.

RESULTS

Surgical factors such as use of single rod configuration or incorrect rod contouring might affect early failure of MCGRs. Patient's older age and higher BMI are correlated with rod slippage. Wear debris and distraction mechanism failure may result from implant design and iteration.

CONCLUSION

Despite the complications reported, this technology still offers one of the best solutions to spine surgeons dealing with severe EOS. Lowering the complication rate by identifying risk factors for failure is possible and further studies in this direction are required. Once the risk factors are well described, some of these can be addressed enabling a safer use of MCGRs.

Diverse approaches to scoliosis in young children

Management of scoliosis in young children needs a comprehensive approach because of its complexity. There are many debatable points; however, only serial casting, growing rods (including traditional and magnetically controlled) and anterior vertebral body tethering will be discussed in this article.Serial casting is a time-gaining method for postponing surgical interventions in early onset scoliosis, despite the fact that it has some adverse effects which should be considered and discussed with the family beforehand.Use of growing rods is a growth-friendly surgical technique for the treatment of early onset spine deformity which allows chest growth and lung development. Magnetically controlled growing rods are effective in selected cases although they sometimes have a high number of unplanned revisions.Anterior vertebral body tethering seems to be a promising novel technique for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in immature cases. It provides substantial correction and continuous curve control while maintaining mobility between spinal segments. However, long-term results, adverse effects and their prevention should be clarified by future studies. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:753-762. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190087.

Awake serial body casting for the management of infantile idiopathic scoliosis: is general anesthesia necessary?

STUDY DESIGN

It is a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of serial body casting for infantile idiopathic scoliosis (IIS) with versus without the use of general anesthesia (GA). Serial body casting for IIS has traditionally been performed under GA. However, reports of neurotoxic effects of anesthetics in young children have prompted physicians to consider instead performing these procedures while patients are awake and distracted by electronic devices.

METHODS

Patients from a multicenter registry who underwent serial casting for IIS were included. The patients were divided into asleep (GA) and awake (no GA) cohorts. Comparisons were made between pre-casting, first in-cast, and post-casting radiographic measures in each cohort. The rates of successful casting (≥ 10° major CA improvement), curve progression, and incidence of casting abandonment for surgical intervention were also compared.

RESULTS

One-hundred and twenty-one patients who underwent serial casting for IIS were included. Ninety-two (76%) patients were asleep during casting procedures, while 29 (24%) were awake. Patients in the awake cohort were older (p < 0.01), had a lower BMI (p = 0.03), and more severe curve magnitudes (p < 0.01) at baseline. Patients in the awake cohort experienced greater first-in-cast correction of the major curve (p = 0.01) and improvement in thoracic spine height (p < 0.01). The rate of casting success was higher in the awake cohort (72%) as compared to the asleep cohort (48%) (p = 0.02), although the rate of curve progression (worsening) was similar (p = 0.880). Lastly, there was a lower rate of conversion to surgery at 2 years post-initiation of casting, although this was not statistically significant (0% vs. 8%; p = 0.126).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent awake serial casting had similar radiographic outcomes as compared to those who were under general anesthesia during the procedures. Thus, awake casting may provide a safe and effective alternative to the use of general anesthesia in patients with idiopathic infantile scoliosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Serial Casting in Neuromuscular and Syndromic Early-onset Scoliosis (EOS) Can Delay Surgery Over 2 Years

BACKGROUND

The primary goal in managing early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is delaying/preventing surgical intervention while allowing improved spinal growth and chest wall and lung development to improve life expectancy. The effectiveness of serial casting for patients with neuromuscular and syndromic EOS is unclear.

METHODS

Patients from 2 multicenter registries who underwent serial casting for nonidiopathic scoliosis (NIS) were reviewed retrospectively. Comparisons were made between precasting and postcasting major and compensatory curves and spine height. The need for surgical intervention and any treatment complications were documented. Risk factors for major curve progression from baseline to casting cessation were evaluated via univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (23 females; 21 males) with NIS (26 syndromic, 18 neuromuscular) and a mean age of 3.2 years at baseline were included. Mean follow-up and casting duration was 3.9 and 2.0 years, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between mean precasting and postcasting major curve (55 vs. 60 degrees; P=0.348), minor curve (31 vs. 33 degrees; P=0.510), or rib-vertebra angle difference (18 vs. 29 degrees; P=0.840). However, thoracic height (15.5 vs. 16.8 cm; P=0.031) and lumbar height (8.9 vs. 9.8 cm; P=0.013) were significantly greater upon casting cessation. Currently, 13 patients (30%) have had successful casting (improvement of major curve ≥10 degrees) while 24 patients (55%) experienced major curve progression (worsening), and 19 patients (43%) required surgical intervention. Mean time from first casting to surgery was 34.5±15.1 months. There were no statistically significant predictors for major curve progression on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal deformity progression despite casting and the subsequent need for surgical intervention for NIS were significantly higher compared with those reported for idiopathic EOS. However, serial casting did afford a substantial delay in surgical intervention. Ultimately, serial casting for neuromuscular or syndromic EOS is an effective strategy for delaying surgical intervention, despite suboptimal radiographic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Nonanesthetized Alternatively Repetitive Cast and Brace Treatment for Early-onset Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Use of cast is a standard treatment (Tx) choice for early-onset scoliosis. Recently, toxicity from repetitive use of general anesthesia has received attention by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We introduce a nonanesthetized cast Tx protocol called alternatively-repetitive-cast-and-brace (ARCB) that we have used since 1995 and have conducted an extensive follow-up on these patients to verify the efficacy of this protocol.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Of a consecutive series of 155 patients who have undergone cast Tx at a single institution, 98 patients (male: 36, female: 62) have been identified under the following criteria: (1) Initial age before ARCB of ≤6; (2) Follow-up period of ≥2 years; (3) Initial scoliosis ≥35 degrees. Patients consisted of the following: congenital/structural: 45, idiopathic: 23, neuromuscular: 6, syndromic: 24. Precast, postfinal cast, minimum in-cast Cobb, as well as thoracic and T1-S1 heights were measured. Fifty-six of these patients had available pulse oximetry on days before and after initial cast, and these were also evaluated to assess cardiopulmonary effects that the cast have on the patients.

RESULTS

Patients were casted 6.6 times, with a mean initial Cobb of 56.5 degrees and a final follow-up Cobb of 57.1 degrees. Follow-up period was 5.0 years. Mean curve progression per follow-up period was 0.5 degrees/y. Minimum in-cast Cobb was 25.6 degrees. Initially patients had a thoracic and T1-S1 height of 12.6 and 22.5 cm, respectively. At final cast, these were 15.3 and 27.2 cm, respectively. Of these patients, 39 had progression >1 degree/y, of which 83.1% had resulted in surgical correction, while this was true for only 37.3% of those that did not show such progression. Idiopathic patients had the greatest correction rate by cast (69%) and had shown an overall progression rate of -2.3 degrees/y. Pulse-oximetry results were not significant amongst patients before and after cast placement.

CONCLUSIONS

ARCB is a versatile and practical Tx choice. It is an effective delaying method in sparing time until surgery with no apparent cardiopulmonary compromise. Curve control was most effective in Idiopathic patients while some curve control was achieved in other etiologies which may have spared time until their eventual surgery.

SIGNIFICANCE

Cast Tx without the need of general anesthesia is an increasingly important topic since anesthesia toxicity from its repetitive use has become apparent. This study exemplifies safe and efficacious use of such cast with effective suppression on cast progression in different etiologies at various degrees.

Evolution of casting techniques in early-onset and congenital scoliosis

Casting is being utilized as a therapeutic strategy in some mild to moderate cases obviating surgical intervention for management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). Bracing, another conservative modality, applies comparable correcting forces on chest wall and axial skeleton. But cast application carries additional advantage of sustained restorative force which bypasses issue of compliance seen with brace wear. There is no specific blanket treatment, conservative or surgical, for the early-onset spinal deformities. Serial cast application provides near total correction of less severe curves (less than 500 to 600) if treatment is initiated before age of 2 yrs. In this review article, we will assess the evolution of plaster cast application in management of EOS and also describe technique of EDF (Elongation- Derotation- Flexion) casting.

Casting in infantile idiopathic scoliosis as a temporising measure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective:

Treatment of infantile idiopathic scoliosis remains vague. Because implantation of temporary telescopic devices carries a high risk of complications, interest in the older technique of serial casting is growing as a temporising measure before invasive procedures. The goal of this review was to meta-analyse studies examining the effect and safety of casting in infantile idiopathic scoliosis.

Methods:

Two reviewers independently searched for relevant studies in PubMed and Embase databases through November 2018. The studies included were limited to infantile idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent casting, had a mean Cobb angle of 20 or more and written in English. The methodological quality of the chosen studies was assessed. The primary outcome was the difference in Cobb angle means from before and after casting. The secondary outcome was adverse events of casting. Heterogeneity was explored and a funnel plot was drawn.

Results:

Of the 366 studies screened, 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis (243 subjects) and all were non-randomised. The casting was consistently associated with a reduction in the mean Cobb angle. The pooled mean difference was 24.85° (95% confidence interval: 19.25 to 30.46, p < 0.001). A number of reversible adverse events were reported, most commonly skin irritation and transient pulmonary symptoms. Heterogeneity between studies was high. In the meta-regression analysis, the starting Cobb angle did not influence Cobb angle change, but there was an inverse correlation between the mean difference in Cobb angle and mean age.

Conclusion:

Casting seems to be effective and safe in decreasing Cobb angle even in high curve magnitudes. In older patients, casting showed less Cobb angle correction.

Magnetic Controlled Growth Rods in the Treatment of Scoliosis: Safety, Efficacy and Patient Selection

Early-onset scoliosis is defined as a spinal curvature greater than 10° in children prior to 10 years of age. Untreated EOS may lead to progressively severe spinal deformity, impaired pulmonary development, restrictive lung disease, and both increased morbidity and mortality. Limitations of established conservative treatments include inability to correct severe deformity, as well as challenges with compliance when casting and bracing is applied. In addition, surgical treatment in the form of traditional growing rods requires regular surgical lengthenings and is associated with complications inherent with repeated invasive procedures and exposure to general anesthesia. MAGEC is an evolving magnetically controlled growing rod system for the treatment of EOS. After initial implantation, lengthening is achieved non-invasively by using magnetic external remote control. MAGEC offers the potential to control moderate and severe EOS, while avoiding repeated surgical procedures and associated complications. In this review, we examine the results from clinical, radiological and explant studies following the use of MAGEC, in the context of other established and emerging treatments for EOS.

Serial elongation derotation flexion casting in children with infantile and juvenile scoliosis

Infantile (IS) and juvenile scoliosis (JS) are among the most challenging conditions pediatric orthopedic surgeons are facing in the present days. However, the best treatment of IS and JS is still debated and it remains controversial, at least for some aspects. Untreated early onset spinal deformities may lead to pulmonary and heart compromise. Growth friendly surgical techniques imply multiple distractions with increased risk of auto-fusion, infection and curve stiffening. Serial casting has been proven to be a valuable option to treat children with early onset scoliosis (EOS) in an attempt to delay surgery (in most cases) or to cure the disease (in few cases). More than five decades ago, Cotrel and Morel from France, introduced the Elongation-Derotation-Flexion (EDF) casting technique. EDF cast is a custom-made thoracolumbar cast that corrects the deformed spine three-dimensionally. Serial EDF casting is able to modulate spinal growth and it can-at least in some cases-prevent the progression of the spinal deformity. Today, serial EDF casting technique has become one of the accepted treatment options for the management of children with IS and JS. The main objective of this work is to describe the EDF serial casting technique for the treatment of children with IS and JS, as well as to highlight its advantages and its limits by providing a review of the most recent literature.

Serial casting in early onset scoliosis: syndromic scoliosis is no contraindication

BACKGROUND

Serial casting is a treatment for early onset scoliosis (EOS) in young children to achieve curve correction before bracing or to postpone initial surgical treatment until the patient is older. Good results have been reported for patients with idiopathic early onset scoliosis (IS). However, there are few reports of results in non-idiopathic cases, and the benefits of non-surgical methods in the syndromic-associated early onset scoliosis subgroup are unknown.

METHODS

Retrospective single-institution study of patient charts and X-rays of all cases of sustained serial casting for EOS. Staged correction was obtained by applying three consecutive casts under general anaesthesia. These were changed every 4 weeks, followed by the implementation of a custom-made full-time Chêneau brace. Correction was measured by Cobb angle (CA) and rib-vertebra angle difference (RVAD) on whole spine anterior-posterior radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed via ANOVA.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 6 patiens with IS and 10 with non-idiopathic scoliosis (NIS) - exclusively syndromic-associated. The mean age at onset of treatment was 35 months (±15). The mean follow up was 21 months (±15). In IS patients average CA/RVAD before treatment was 46°(±8)/20°(±12). In NIS patients average CA/RVAD before treatment was 55°(±15)/24°(±14). After application of the third cast, the CA/RVAD was reduced to 20°(±11)/11°(±10) in IS patients. Whereas in NIS patients average CA/RVAD after the thrid cast was 28°(±12)/18°(±13). At latest follow-up the CA/RVAD was 16°(±7)/9°(±8) in IS patients and 31°(±11)/17° (±15) in NIS patients.

CONCLUSION

Syndromic etiology is not a contraindication for serial casting in EOS. Our results show a curve correction, measured in CA, of 65% in IS patients and 44% in NIS patients. Significant reduction in the morphologic deformity, measured in RVAD, was achieved in the IS cohort, but not in the NIS cohort. In all cases surgical treatment could be delayed.

A comparison of growth among growth-friendly systems for scoliosis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The optimal method for surgical treatment of early onset scoliosis is currently unknown. Although the aim of growth-friendly systems is to reduce the curve and maintain growth, there is no consensus on how to measure spinal growth during and after the treatment. Different measurements of different segments (T1-S1, T1-T12, instrumented length) are used for different time points to evaluate growth. The aim of this review is to assess what measurements are used and to compare the growth-friendly systems based on spinal growth during treatment.

METHODS

The electronic MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for original articles that reported growth for traditional growing rods (TGR), vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib expansion technique (VEPTR), Shilla, magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), and Luque-trolley systems. All measurements were recorded, and weighted averages calculated in centimeter per year were compared.

RESULTS

We included 52 studies (26 TGR, 12 MCGR, 6 VEPTR, 4 Luque trolley, 1 Shilla, and 3 mixed). Often only one segment was reported (T1-S1 length in 22 studies, T1-T12 length in two studies, and instrumented length in five studies). The remaining 22 studies reported T1-S1 length in combination with T1-T12 length (15 studies) or instrumented length (eight studies). Spinalgrowth achieved by initial correction only was a considerable 3.9 cm (based on 34 studies) as well as the spinal growth achieved by the final fusion surgery (2.3 cm in four studies). To specifically assess growth achieved with the system, length gain after initial surgery and before final fusion in growth system graduates was considered. Only four TGR studies reported on this "true" spinal growth with 0.6 and 0.3 cm/y in the T1-S1 and T1-T12 segment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Reporting on spinal growth is currently inadequate and does not allow a good comparison of different techniques. However, all systems often report growth similar to Dimeglio's T1-S1 spinal growth of 1 cm/y. It should be recognized though that a considerable portion of the reported spinal growth is the result of the initial and final surgical correction and not due to the growth-friendly implant.

Survey to describe variability in early onset scoliosis cast practices

PURPOSE

To investigate paediatric orthopaedists' cast practices for early onset scoliosis regarding patient selection, cast application, radiographic evaluation, treatment cessation and adjunctive bracing.

METHODS

A casting survey was distributed to all paediatric orthopaedists in Children's Spine and Growing Spine Study Groups (n = 92). Questions included physician and patient characteristics, technique, treatment, outcomes, radiographic measurements and comparison to other treatments. A total of 55 orthopaedists (60%) responded, and descriptive statistics were calculated on the subset who cast (n = 45).

RESULTS

A majority of respondents use cast treatment for idiopathic and syndromic scoliosis patients, but not for neuromuscular or congenital scoliosis patients. Major curve angle ranked most important in orthopaedists' decision to commence cast treatment, in comparison with rib-vertebra angle difference or clinical observations. The major curve angle threshold to initiate casting was a median of 30° (20° to 70°), and the minimum patient age was median ten months (3 to 24). First in-cast and out-of-cast radiographs are taken standing, supine, awake, under anesthesia and/or in traction. In all, 58% consistently cast over or under the arm, while 44% vary position by patient. Respondents were divided about the use of a brace after cast treatment: 22% do not prescribe a brace, 31% always do and 36% do in some patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Future multicentre research studies must standardize radiographic practices and consider age and major curve angle at cast initiation and termination, scoliosis aetiology, shoulder position and treatment duration. Practices need to be aligned or compared in these areas in order to distinguish what makes for the best cast treatment possible.Level of Evidence: V, Expert opinion.

Early-onset Scoliosis: Contemporary Decision-making and Treatment Options

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) describes a wide array of diagnoses and deformities exposed to growth. This potentially life-threatening condition is still 1 of the biggest challenges in pediatric orthopaedics. The enlightenment of Bob Campbell's thoracic insufficiency syndrome concept and the negative impact of the earlier short and straight spine fusion approach on respiratory function and survival have fueled the evolution of EOS care. Despite all the progress made, growth-friendly spine surgery remains to be a burden to patients and caregivers. Even down-sized implants and remote-controlled noninvasive rod expansions do not omit unexpected returns to the operating room: failures of foundations, rod breakage, difficulties to keep the sagittal balance, progressive transverse plane deformities, stiffening, and the need for final instrumented fusion are still common. However, past experience and the current multitude of surgical strategies and implants have sharpened the decision-making process, patients with thoracic insufficiency syndrome require earliest possible vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs application. Flexible deformities below 60 degrees, with normal spinal anatomy and without thoracic involvement, benefit from serial Mehta casting which revived as a long available but not-used strategy. In case of progression, standard double growing rods or-if available, affordable, and applicable-magnetically controlled motorized rods provide deformity control and growth promotion. Shilla growth-guiding technique is a less costly alternative. Its lack of stiff lengthening boxes or actuators may be beneficial in difficult deformities. Anterior convex flexible tethering promises benefits of sparing the trunk muscles and keeping mobility. However, this step towards a true nonfusion concept has yet to stand the test of broad clinical application.

Current Use of Evidence-Based Medicine in Pediatric Spine Surgery

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a process of decision-making aimed at making the best clinical decisions as they relate to patients' health. The current use of EBM in pediatric spine surgery is varied, based mainly on the availability of high-quality data. The use of EBM is limited in idiopathic scoliosis, whereas EBM has been used to investigate the treatment of pediatric spondylolysis. Studies on early onset scoliosis are of low quality, making EBM difficult in this condition. Future focus and commitment to study quality in pediatric spinal surgery will likely increase the role of EBM in these conditions.

What's New in Congenital Scoliosis?

BACKGROUND

Congenital scoliosis is a failure of vertebral formation, segmentation, or a combination of the 2 arising from abnormal vertebral development during weeks 4 to 6 of gestation. The associated spinal deformity can be of varying severity and result in a stable or progressive deformity based on the type and location of the anomalous vertebra(e). Bracing for congenital scoliosis is rarely indicated, while recent reports have demonstrated the utility of serial derotational casting for longer curves with multiple anomalous vertebrae as an effective "time buying strategy" to delay the need for surgery. Earlier hemivertebra excision and short-segment posterior spinal fusion have been advocated to prevent future curve progression of the deformity and/or the development of large compensatory curves. It has been shown in recent long-term follow-up studies that growth rates of the vertebral body and spinal canal are not as dramatically affected by pedicle screw instrumentation at a young age as once thought. Growth friendly surgery with either spine-based or rib-based anchors has demonstrated good results with curve correction while maintaining spinal growth. Rib-based anchors are typically more commonly indicated in the setting of chest wall abnormalities and/or when spinal anatomy precludes placement of spinal instrumentation. Recently, magnetically controlled growing rods have shown promising results in several studies that include a small subset of congenital scoliosis cases.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify existing studies related to the treatment of congenital scoliosis published from January 1, 2005 to June 1, 2016. Databases included PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library. The search was limited to English articles and yielded 36 papers. This project was initiated by the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Publications Committee and was reviewed and approved by the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Presidential Line.

RESULTS

A total of 36 papers were selected for review based upon new findings. Classic manuscripts on congenital scoliosis are also included to provide sufficient background information.

CONCLUSIONS

Congenital scoliosis represents a wide range of pathology from the simple, stable hemivertebra to the complex, progressive spinal deformity with chest wall abnormalities and associated cardiac, renal, and neural axis anomalies. This paper reviews the natural history and associated anomalies with congenital scoliosis as well as the most up-to-date classification schemes and various treatment options for the care of this challenging patient population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

Serial Casting for Infantile Idiopathic Scoliosis: Radiographic Outcomes and Factors Associated With Response to Treatment

BACKGROUND

Serial casting for early-onset scoliosis has been shown to improve curve deformity. Our goal was to define clinical and radiographic features that determine response to treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with idiopathic infantile scoliosis with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: progressive idiopathic infantile scoliosis and initial casting before 6 years of age. Two groups were analyzed and compared: group 1 (≥10-degree improvement in Cobb angle from baseline) and group 2 (no improvement).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with an average Cobb angle of 48 degrees (range, 24 to 72 degrees) underwent initial casting at an average age of 2.1 years (range, 0.7 to 5.4 y). Average follow-up was 3.5 years (range, 2 to 6.9 y). Sex, age at initial casting, magnitude of spinal deformity, and curve flexibility (defined as change in Cobb angle from pretreatment to first in-cast radiograph) were not significantly different between groups (P>0.05). Group 1 had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) than group 2 at the onset of treatment (17.6 vs. 14.8, P<0.05). Univariate analysis of demographic, radiographic, and treatment factors revealed that only BMI was predictive of Cobb improvement (P=0.04; odds ratio=2.38). Group 1 (n=15) had a significantly lower Cobb angle (21 vs. 56 degrees) and rib vertebral angle difference (13 vs. 25 degrees) compared with group 2 at latest follow-up (P<0.05). A significantly larger proportion of children who were casted at less than 1.8 years of age had a Cobb angle <20 degrees at latest follow-up (P=0.03). Group 2 maintained stable clinical and radiograph parameters from pretreatment to most recent follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

To maintain a homogeneous cohort, we excluded patients with syndromes and developmental delays. We believe that analyzing a homogeneous group provides more meaningful results than if we studied a heterogeneous sample. BMI was significantly associated with outcome such that for each unit increase in BMI, there is a 2.38× increase in the chance of improvement. Curve flexibility was similar between groups, which suggest that the amount of correction obtained at initial casting does not confirm treatment success. Key aspects of treatment that may determine success include age of less than 1.8 years at initiation of casting and derotation of the spine to correct rib vertebral angle difference of <20 degrees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-Therapeutic.

A brief history and review of modern casting techniques in early onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

Body casts have a long history in the treatment of spinal deformity. Currently the use of body casts is limited to early onset scoliosis. Here, we aim to provide a brief narrative of the evolution of cast application for the management of spinal deformity.

METHODS

A history of cast application is provided with a brief review of the orthopedic literature. The current indications for cast application and the authors' preferred technique are described.

RESULTS

Serial casting is an effective treatment method for early onset scoliosis. It may be definitive for most idiopathic curves or used to delay surgical intervention in more severe idiopathic, syndromic and even congenital curves.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons who treat children with early onset scoliosis should familiarize themselves with serial cast application techniques.

Serial elongation-derotation-flexion casting for children with early-onset scoliosis

Various early-onset spinal deformities, particularly infantile and juvenile scoliosis (JS), still pose challenges to pediatric orthopedic surgeons. The ideal treatment of these deformities has yet to emerge, as both clinicians and surgeons still face multiple challenges including preservation of thoracic motion, spine and cage, and protection of cardiac and lung growth and function. Elongation-derotation-flexion (EDF) casting is a technique that uses a custom-made thoracolumbar cast based on a three-dimensional correction concept. EDF can control progression of the deformity and - in some cases-coax the initially-curved spine to grow straighter by acting simultaneously in the frontal, sagittal and coronal planes. Here we provide a comprehensive review of how infantile and JS can affect normal spine and thorax and how serial EDF casting can be used to manage these spinal deformities. A fresh review of the literature helps fully understand the principles of the serial EDF casting technique and the effectiveness of conservative treatment in patients with early-onset spinal deformities, particularly infantile and juvenile scolisois.

Nonsurgical Management of Early-onset Scoliosis

Early-onset scoliosis is potentially fatal if left untreated. Although surgical management with growing instrumentation may be necessary, this is not a panacea and is associated with high complication rates. Recent evidence has demonstrated that nonsurgical treatment can be an effective early management strategy in delaying or even precluding the need for surgery, especially surgery with growing instrumentation. The goal of both nonsurgical and surgical management is to control or correct the spinal curve to allow appropriate pulmonary development while delaying definitive fusion until an appropriate skeletal age. Although more commonly used to delay surgery, serial cast correction using the Cotrel and Morel elongation-derotation-flexion technique may result in complete correction in patients with infantile idiopathic scoliosis and smaller curve magnitudes.

Serial derotational casting in congenital scoliosis as a time-buying strategy

BACKGROUND

Serial casting is an effective treatment modality in early-onset idiopathic scoliosis; however, the role of this method in congenital scoliosis is not well studied.

METHODS

A total of 11 patients with progressive congenital scoliosis were treated with serial cast application. Age at initial cast application, magnitudes of the congenital, compensatory and sagittal deformities, coronal balance, T1 to T12 height, number of casts and time-in cast per patient, subsequent surgical interventions, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean age at the first cast application was 40 months, and the average number of cast changes was 6.2 per patient. There were no major complications. The average precasting curve magnitude was 70.7 degrees (range, 44 to 88 degrees) and was significantly reduced to 55.1 degrees (range, 16 to 78 degrees) at the latest follow-up (P=0.005). The average precasting compensatory curve was 55.8 degrees (range, 38 to 72 degrees) and was significantly reduced to 39.8 degrees (range, 23 to 62 degrees) at the latest follow-up (P=0.017). Average T1 to 12 height increased from 12.8 cm at post-first cast to a 14.6 cm at the latest follow-up (P=0.04). Average time in cast was 26.3 months (range, 13 to 49 mo). During the treatment period, none of the patients required surgery for curve progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial derotational casting is a safe and effective time-buying strategy to delay the surgical interventions in congenital deformities in the short-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Effective nonoperative treatment in juvenile idiopathic scoliosis

Nonoperative management of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis (JIS) has been reported to be less effective than that of infantile idiopathic scoliosis. The goal of this study was to analyse the results of casting and/or bracing in JIS. Clinical data from seven patients with JIS, treated with casting followed by bracing (n=3) or by bracing alone (n=4), were retrospectively collected, and curve severity was measured before, during and after treatment. The median Cobb angle decreased from 37° to 25°. No patient needed surgery at a median follow-up of 4.6 years (3.4-9.1 years). Casting and/or bracing is effective for the management of JIS.