Complications of Posterior Column Osteotomies in the Pediatric Spinal Deformity Patient

One-stage posterior-only correction in severe and rigid scoliosis exceeding 90°: radiographic and surgical outcomes

PURPOSE

Scoliosis, if left untreated, can lead to severe curvatures exceeding 90°, causing devastating functional impairments. Various surgical methods exist, but the optimal approach is still debated. One-stage posterior spinal fusion (PSF)-only surgery is gaining favor for its comparable outcomes and reduced morbidity. This study, focusing on radiographic and surgical outcomes, evaluates the efficacy and safety of one-stage PSF for scoliosis curves over 90° in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Thirty-five pediatric patients with scoliosis (Cobb angle ≥ 90°) who underwent one-stage posterior spinal fusion (PSF)-only surgery from January 2020 to December 2023 were included. Patients with idiopathic, neuromuscular, or syndromic scoliosis were included. The primary outcome was the correction rate (CR) of scoliosis curves. Secondary outcomes included major postoperative complications, surgery duration, blood loss, and hospital stay length. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic and clinical data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean CR for major and minor curves was 65.2 ± 10.5% and 57.9 ± 12.8%, respectively. The mean preoperative and postoperative Cobb angle of major and minor curves was 102.6° and 35.6°, 68.6° and 28.8°, respectively. There were 13 recorded complications, with only one being life-threatening. Mean blood loss was 787 ± 437 ml. Total surgical time was roughly 5 h per case. The mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was 9 days.

CONCLUSIONS

PSF-only surgery for severe scoliosis over 90° is effective and safe. It supports using posterior-only methods as a viable alternative to combined approaches, suitable for patients with even more severe curves when their condition allows.

Incidental dural tears during pediatric posterior spinal fusions

PURPOSE

To characterize the frequency of incidental dural tears in pediatric spine surgery, their treatment, complications, and results of long-term follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all pediatric patients who underwent a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) between 2004-2019 at a tertiary children's hospital was conducted. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, intra-operative data, presence of an incidental dural tear, repair method, and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

3043 PSFs were reviewed, with 99 dural tears identified in 94 patients (3.3% overall incidence). Mean follow-up was 35.7 months (range 0.1-142.5). When the cause of the dural tear was specified, 69% occurred during exposure, 5% during pedicle screw placement, 4% during osteotomy, 2% during removal of implants, and 2% during intra-thecal injection of morphine. The rate of dural tears during primary PSF was significantly lower than during revision PSF procedures (2.6% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.05). 86.9% of dural tears were repaired and/or sealed intraoperatively, while 13.1% had spontaneous resolution. Postoperative headaches developed in 13.1% of patients and resolved at a mean of 7.6 days. There was no difference in the incidence of headaches in patients that were ordered bedrest vs. no bedrest (p > 0.99). Postoperative infections occurred in 9.5% of patients and 24.1% patients were identified to have undergone a revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of intra-operative dural tears in pediatric spine surgery is 3.3%. Although complications associated with the dural tear occur, most resolve over time and there were no long-term sequelae in patients with 2 years of follow up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Postoperative complications following Schwab-grade-I versus Schwab-grade-II PCO in treating severe rigid kyphoscoliosis patients: comparative matched-group outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Standard partial facetectomies, (Smith-Petersen Osteotomy, (SPO), (Schwab-grade-I) and complete facet resection also known as Ponte osteotomy, (PO), (Schwab-grade-II) are narrowly akin and collectively appreciated as posterior column shortening osteotomies (PCOs). The former is considered a gentler osteotomy grade than the latter. The spine literature provides very little information on their comparison regarding perioperative complications and major curve correction rate outcomes.

PURPOSE

To determine whether Schwab-grade-I PCO (SPO) and Schwab-grade-II PCO (PO) are comparably safe in the surgical management of severe rigid scoliosis or kyphoscoliosis patients.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective single-center comparative clinical study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 38 patients with severe rigid scoliosis or kyphoscoliosis were propensity score matched in this study, (SPO-treated); n=21 (55.30%) and (PO-treated); n=17 (44.70%), who underwent primary spinal deformity corrective surgery, respectively.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes included demographics, baseline pulmonary functional outcomes, perioperative complications incidence, hospital costs, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire scores.

METHODS

Following approval by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital-Affiliated Capital Medical University in Beijing, out of a total of 82 consecutive surgical patients with complete data demonstrating severe and/or rigid spinal deformity, a pool of 38 of the 82 (46.3%) propensity-matched adult (≥18 years) patients with severe rigid scoliosis or kyphoscoliosis defined with a preoperative major curve magnitude of ≥80° on anteroposterior plain radiographs, and flexibility of <25% on bending plain radiographs who underwent primary spinal deformity corrective surgery were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were dichotomized into two osteotomy groups: standard (partial) facetectomy (SPO-treated), n=21 with an average age of 24.67 years, (Schwab-grade-I PCO) and complete facet excision, (PO-treated), (ie, Schwab-grade-II PCO), n=17 with an average age of 23.12 years. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. Primary outcomes included baseline demographics and clinical features. Secondary outcomes included perioperative [intraoperative, immediate, and 2-year postoperative] complication rates. Tertiary outcomes included perioperative ODI and SRS-22 scores. Statistical analyses were carried out by Student t-test and Pearson's Chi-square test (Fisher's Exact Test), through Python statistical software package. Statistical significance was set at (p<.05).

RESULTS

Of the 38 matched severe rigid scoliosis or kyphoscoliosis patients, 55.30% (n=21) were SPO-treated and 44.70% (n=17) were PO-treated patients, respectively. The overall average age of patients was 23.97 years, with a female incidence of 76.32%. Major curve correction rates were 49.19% and 57.40% in SPO-treated and PO-treated patients, respectively, (p>.05). Immediately following surgery, comparable overall complication rates of 28.57% (n=6/21) versus 29.41% (n=5/17) were observed in the SPO-treated and PO-treated patients, respectively, (p=.726). We observed incidences of 9.52%, (n=2/21) versus 5.88%, (n=1/17) for surgical intensive care unit (SICU) admission, and incidences of 4.76%, (n=1/21) versus 5.88%, (n=1/17) for cardiopulmonary events in SPO-treated versus PO-treated patients following corrective surgery, respectively, (p>.05). The incidences of neurological deficits in the SPO-treated and PO-treated patients were respectively, 14.29%, (n=3/21) versus 17.65%, (n=3/17) immediately following surgery, (p>.05), and 0.00%, (n=0/21) in SPO-treated versus 14.28%, (n=3/21) in PO-treated patients at ≥2 years postoperative, (p<.05). Among the three patients that reported neurological deficits in the PO-treated group at ≥2 years postoperative, two patients had pre-existing baseline neurological deficits. The ODI score in the PO-treated group was significantly inferior at a minimum 2-year follow-up, (p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, both SPO-treated and PO-treated patients demonstrated statistically comparable surgical complications immediately following corrective surgery. Severe rigid kyphoscoliosis patients with preexisting baseline neurological deficits were more inclined to sustain neurological morbidity following corrective surgery. PCO corrective techniques are warranted as safe options for treating patients with severe rigid spine deformity phenotypes.

Comparison of operative implications between adolescent and young adult idiopathic scoliosis patients from scoliosis research society mortality and morbidity database

PURPOSE

To compare the operative implications between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (10-18 years) and young adult idiopathic scoliosis (YAdIS) patients (19-30 years).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study querying the SRS M&M database for AIS (10-18 years) and YAdIS (19-30 years) cases enrolled between 2009 and 2015. Demographic and surgical parameters (Lenke curve classification, preoperative curve magnitude, approach type, osteotomy type, estimated blood volume (EBV), levels of fusion and ASA scores) were evaluated and compared between groups.

RESULTS

N = 690: AIS (n = 607) and YAdIS (n = 83). Lenke curve classification distributions in AIS and YAdIS cases were: main thoracic, 293 vs. 34; double thoracic, 42 vs. 5; double major, 159 vs. 15; triple major, 15 vs. 5; thoracolumbar, 85 vs. 17; and lumbar, 5 vs. 6, respectively. Patients with a coronal curve > 90° were significantly greater in YAdIS vs. AIS patients, p = 0.008. Anterior and combined surgery rates were significantly higher in YAdIS, p = 0.028. Two-staged surgeries were significantly higher for YAdIS cohort, p = 0.01. Osteotomy rate was similar between groups, p = 0.42, but proportion of 3-column osteotomies was significantly higher for YAdIS, p < 0.001. ASA (severe systemic disease and some functional limitation) score 3 patients' rate was higher in YAdIS cohort, p = 0.01. EBV was significantly higher in YAdIS, p = 0.01. Average number of levels of fusions between cohorts was not significant, p = 0.87.

CONCLUSIONS

The operative implications observed with young adult idiopathic scoliosis patients may potentially result in more complex surgical procedures and operative-associated complications than their adolescent counterparts. Further studies are required and should include a larger number of cases, be prospective in nature and verifiable data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Posterior column osteotomy plus unilateral cage strutting for correction of lumbosacral fractional curve in degenerative lumbar scoliosis

Background

Inadequate release of the posterior spinal bone elements may hinder the correction of the lumbosacral fractional curve in degenerative lumbar scoliosis, since the lumbosacral junction tends to be particularly rigid and may already be fused into an abnormal position. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcome and complications of posterior column osteotomy plus unilateral cage strutting technique on lumbosacral concavity for correction of fractional curve in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients.

Methods

Thirty-two degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients with lumbosacral fractional curve more than 15° that were surgically treated by posterior column osteotomy plus unilateral cage strutting technique were retrospectively reviewed. The patients’ medical records were reviewed to identify demographic and surgical data, including age, sex, body mass index, back pain, leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, operation time, blood loss, and instrumentation levels. Radiological data including coronal balance distance, Cobb angle, lumbosacral coronal angle, sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis, and lumbosacral lordotic angle were evaluated before and after surgery. Cage subsidence and bone fusion were evaluated at 2-year follow-up.

Results

All patients underwent the operation successfully; lumbosacral coronal angle changed from preoperative 20.1 ± 5.3° to postoperative 5.8 ± 5.7°, with mean correction of 14.3 ± 4.4°, and the correction was maintained at 2-year follow-up. Cobb’s angle and coronal balance distance decreased from preoperative to postoperative; the correction was maintained at 2-year follow-up. Sagittal vertical axis decreased, and lumbar lordosis increased from preoperative to postoperative; the correction was also maintained at 2-year follow-up. Lumbosacral lordotic angle presented no change from preoperative to postoperative and from postoperative to 2-year follow-up. Postoperatively, there were 8 patients with lumbosacral coronal angle more than 10°, they got the similar lumbosacral coronal angle correction, but presented larger preoperative Cobb and lumbosacral coronal angle than the other 24 patients. No cage subsidence was detected; all patients achieved intervertebral bone fusion and inter-transverse bone graft fusion at the lumbosacral region at 2-year follow-up.

Conclusion

Posterior column osteotomy plus unilateral cage strutting technique on the lumbosacral concavity facilitate effective correction of the fractional curve in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients through complete release of dural sac as well as the asymmetrical intervertebral reconstruction by cage.