Ability of the Global Alignment and Proportion Score to Predict Mechanical Failure Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery-Validation in 149 Patients With Two-Year Follow-up

How to Reduce the Risk of Mechanical Failures in Adult Deformity Surgery: Comparing GAP Score and Roussouly Type Restoration

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectivesTo assess long-term alignment descriptors correlating with mechanical complications.MethodsThe study included adult spinal deformity cases older than 18, with a minimum of four instrumented levels and a 5-year follow-up. Exclusions: previous spinal fusion, neuromuscular/rheumatic diseases, active infections, tumors, or incomplete radiographic exams. Collected data: demographic, surgical, pre- and post-operative spinopelvic parameters, and post-operative complications. The GAP score, original Roussouly type restoration, Schwab's criteria, and Odontoid to hip axis angle were evaluated using machine learning and logistic regression. Complications were evaluated with a Kaplan-Meier curve.ResultsTwo hundred and twelve patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. The observed rate of revision surgery for mechanical complications was 40.6% (86 out of 212 patients). Higher post-operative GAP scores were associated with increased risks of revision for junctional failure (AUC = 0.72 [IC 95%] 0.62-0.80). The inability to restore the original Roussouly spinal shape was statistically associated with higher mechanical failure rates. A machine-learning approach and subsequent logistic regression found that the GAP score and original Roussouly type restoration are the most important predictors for mechanical failure, and GAP score lordosis distribution index and relative pelvic version are the most important factors to predict the risk of mechanical failure.ConclusionsIn our series, a proper post-operative GAP Score and the restoration of the original Roussouly type significantly minimize mechanical complication rates. We observed that junctional failure tends to occur earlier among complications, while implant failure occurs later in the follow-up.

Novel radiological predictors for the progression of proximal junctional kyphosis in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with kyphosis following posterior corrective surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the effect of some novel risk factors associated with L1 vertebrae and parameters closely related to the sagittal alignment for the occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) following surgery for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) kyphosis.

METHODS

74 OVCF patients undergoing posterior corrective surgery between January 2008 and June 2021 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. These patients were divided into PJK and non-PJK groups. Spinopelvic parameters, including thoracolumbar slope (TLS) and the L1 plumb line (L1PL) were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at follow-up. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed on various risk factors and Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) scores. Associations between novel parameters and PJK were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

PJK was identified in 28.4% of patients. The mean age and follow-up were 63.45 years and 38.17 months, respectively. There was no difference between the PJK and the non-PJK groups in baseline demographics, pre-operative and immediate post-operative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch. Multiple comparisons showed that the proportion of PJK in the severely disproportioned group(the group with the highest GAP scores) and that of the other two groups with lower GAP scores were statistically different (P < 0.001). Potential risk factors for PJK included preoperative thoracic kyphosis (TK) (P < 0.001), TLS (P = 0.016), postoperative TLS (P < 0.001), and L1PL (P < 0.001). Postoperative TLS and L1PL were respectively independent risk factors for PJK, with the cut-off values set at 8.6° and 10.4 mm to predict the occurrence of PJK.

CONCLUSIONS

TLS and L1PL can be used to predict the occurrence of PJK in patients undergoing surgery for OVCF and are crucial for preventing the progression of PJK. Achieving a proportionate GAP Score postoperatively seems to be a viable option as higher GAP scores were associated with higher rates of PJK.

Machine learning identifies clusters of the normal adolescent spine based on sagittal balance

PURPOSE

This study applied a machine learning semi-supervised clustering approach to radiographs of adolescent sagittal spines from a single pediatric institution to identify patterns of sagittal alignment in the normal adolescent spine. We sought to explore the inherent variability found in adolescent sagittal alignment using machine learning to remove bias and determine whether clusters of sagittal alignment exist.

METHODS

Multiple semi-supervised machine learning clustering algorithms were applied to 111 normal adolescent sagittal spines. Sagittal parameters for resultant clusters were determined.

RESULTS

Machine learning analysis found that the spines did cluster into distinct groups with an optimal number of clusters ranging from 3 to 5. We performed an analysis on both 3 and 5-cluster groups. The 3-cluster groups analysis found good consistency between methods with 96 of 111, while the analysis of 5-cluster groups found consistency with 105 of 111 spines. When assessing for differences in sagittal parameters between the groups for both analyses, there were differences in T4-12 TK, L1-S1 LL, SS, SVA, PI-LL mismatch, and TPA. However, the only parameter that was statistically different for all groups was SVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on machine learning, the adolescent sagittal spine alignments do cluster into distinct groups. While there were distinguishing features with TK and LL, the most important parameter distinguishing these groups was SVA. Further studies may help to understand these findings in relation to spinal deformities.

Which components of the global alignment proportionality score have the greatest impact on outcomes in adult spinal deformity corrective surgery?

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score components on patient outcomes in Adult Spine Deformity (ASD) surgery.

METHODS

Patients included underwent assessment via the GAP score and its individual components: pelvic version (GAP PV), lumbar lordosis (GAP LL), lumbar distribution index (GAP LDI) and spinopelvic component (GAP SP). Multivariable analyses assessed the association between alignment in these components and clinical outcomes in ASD patients.

RESULTS

762 ASD patients met inclusion criteria. Alignment in GAP SP independently predicted meeting MCID for SR-22S and ODI and was associated with a lower likelihood of developing mechanical complications. Patients aligned in GAP SP were less likely to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (OR 0.42, 0.26-0.73, p = 0.01) and PJF (OR 0.3, 0.13-0.74, p = 0.01). Proportioned alignment in GAP SP with disproportioned alignment in GAP LDI contributed to an increased risk of PJK and PJF (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.95-6.82, p = 0.045). There was no significant association of GAP SP proportionality and GAP RPV (OR 1.1, 0.86-2.15, p = 0.253) or GAP LL (OR 1.34, 0.78-4.23, p = 0.673) disproportionality with outcomes. Disproportioned alignment in GAP SP but proportioned alignment in both GAP LL and GAP LDI was associated with decreased likelihood of PJK (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.94, p = 0.02) and PJF (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.19-0.67, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The spinopelvic component of the GAP score is the most significant independent predictor of clinical outcomes. Its interaction with the other components of the GAP score also aids assessment of the risk for mechanical complications.

Anterior Column Realignment Through Open Pre-posterior Release-Anterior-Posterior Fusion Versus Hybrid Minimally Invasive-Anterior-Posterior Fusion for Dynamic Sagittal Imbalance of the Spine

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes after anterior column realignment (ACR) through pre-posterior release-anterior-posterior surgery (PAP) and minimally invasive surgery -lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-LLIF) using hybrid anterior-posterior surgery (AP).

METHODS

A total of 91 patients who underwent ACR with long fusions from T10 vertebra to the sacropelvis with a follow-up period of at least 2 years after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity were included and divided into two groups by surgical method: AP and PAP. AP was performed in 26 and PAP in 65 patients. Clinical outcomes and radiological parameters were investigated and compared. A further comparison was conducted after propensity score matching between the groups.

RESULTS

The more increase of LL and decrease of PI-LL mismatch were observed in the PAP group than in the AP group postoperatively. After propensity score matching, total operation time and intraoperative bleeding were greater, and intensive care unit care and rod fracture were more frequent in the PAP group than in the AP group with statistical significance. Reoperation rate was higher in PAP (29.2%) than in AP (16.7%) without statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

PAP provides a more powerful correction for severe sagittal malalignment than AP procedures. AP results in less intraoperative bleeding, operation time, and postoperative complications. Therefore, this study does not suggest that one treatment is superior to the other.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The T4-L1-Hip Axis: Sagittal Spinal Realignment Targets in Long-Construct Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Early Impact

BACKGROUND

Our understanding of the relationship between sagittal alignment and mechanical complications is evolving. In normal spines, the L1-pelvic angle (L1PA) accounts for the magnitude and distribution of lordosis and is strongly associated with pelvic incidence (PI), and the T4-pelvic angle (T4PA) is within 4° of the L1PA. We aimed to examine the clinical implications of realignment to a normal L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter adult spinal deformity registry was queried for patients who underwent fixation from the T1-T5 region to the sacrum and had 2-year radiographic follow-up. Normal sagittal alignment was defined as previously described for normal spines: L1PA = PI × 0.5 - 21°, and T4-L1PA mismatch = 0°. Mechanical failure was defined as severe proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), displaced rod fracture, or reoperation for junctional failure, pseudarthrosis, or rod fracture within 2 years. Multivariable nonlinear logistic regression was used to define target ranges for L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch that minimized the risk of mechanical failure. The relationship between changes in T4PA and changes in global sagittal alignment according to the C2-pelvic angle (C2PA) was determined using linear regression. Lastly, multivariable regression was used to assess associations between initial postoperative C2PA and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year, adjusting for preoperative scores and age.

RESULTS

The median age of the 247 included patients was 64 years (interquartile range, 57 to 69 years), and 202 (82%) were female. Deviation from a normal L1PA or T4-L1PA mismatch in either direction was associated with a significantly higher risk of mechanical failure, independent of age. Risk was minimized with an L1PA of PI × 0.5 - (19° ± 2°) and T4-L1PA mismatch between -3° and +1°. Changes in T4PA and in C2PA at the time of final follow-up were strongly associated (r 2 = 0.96). Higher postoperative C2PA was independently associated with more disability, more pain, and worse self-image at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

We defined sagittal alignment targets using L1PA (relative to PI) and the T4-L1PA mismatch, which are both directly modifiable during surgery. In patients undergoing long fusion to the sacrum, realignment based on these targets may lead to fewer mechanical failures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Preoperative low Hounsfield units in the lumbar spine are associated with postoperative mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity

PURPOSE

To determine the most valid bone health parameter to predict mechanical complications (MCs) following surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

This multicenter study retrospectively examined the records of patients who had undergone fusion of three or more motion segments, including the pelvis, with a minimum two-year follow-up period. Patients with moderate and severe global alignment and proportion scores were included in the study and divided into two groups: those who developed MCs and those who did not. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and Hounsfield units (HUs) were measured in the lumbar spine on computed tomography. Radiographic parameters were evaluated preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 108 patients, 30 (27.8%) developed MCs, including 26 cases of proximal junctional kyphosis/failure, 2 of distal junctional failure, 6 of rod fracture, and 11 reoperations. HUs were significantly lower in patients who experienced MCs (113.7 ± 41.1) than in those who did not (137.0 ± 46.8; P = 0.02). BMD did not differ significantly between the two groups. The preoperative and two-year postoperative global tilt, as well as the immediately postoperative sagittal vertical axis, were significantly greater in patients who developed MCs than in those who did not (P = 0.02, P < 0.01, and P = 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients who experienced MCs following surgery for ASD had lower HUs than those who did not. HUs may therefore be more useful than BMD for predicting MCs following surgery for ASD.

Which sagittal plane assessment method is most predictive of complications after adult spinal deformity surgery?

PURPOSE

Different methods of sagittal alignment assessment compete for predicting adverse events after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. We wanted to study which method provides greater benefit.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 391 patients operated for ASD, with > 6 instrumented levels, fused to the pelvis, and 2 years of follow-up. Three alignment methods were analyzed 6-week postoperatively: (1) Roussouly mismatch; (2) GAP score/GAP categories; (3) T4-L1-Hip axis. Binary logistic regression generated models that best predict the following adverse events: mechanical complications (MC): in general and isolated (PJK, PJF, rod breakage); reinterventions (in general and after MC); and readmissions. ROC/AUC analysis was also implemented. In a second regression round, we added different variables that were selected on univariate analysis-demographic, surgical, and radiographic-to complete the models.

RESULTS

The best predictor parameters in most models were T4-L1PA mismatch and GAP score; we could not prove a predictive ability of the Roussouly mismatch. The T4-L1PA mismatch best predicted general MC, PJK, PJK + PJF, and readmission, while the GAP score best predicted PJF and reinterventions (for MC and for any complication). However, the variance explained by these models was limited (Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.031-0.113), with odds ratios ranging from 1.070 to 1.456. ROC curves plotted an AUC between 0.57 and 0.70. Introducing additional variables (demographic, surgical, and radiographic) improved prediction in all the models (Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.082-0.329) and allowed predicting rod breakage.

CONCLUSION

The T4-L1-Hip axis and GAP score show potential in predicting adverse events, surpassing the Roussouly method. Despite partial efficacy in complication anticipation, recognizing postoperative sagittal alignment as a key modifiable risk factor, the crucial need arises to integrate diverse variables, both modifiable and non-modifiable, for enhanced predictive accuracy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Development of ethnicity-adjusted global alignment and proportion score to predict the risk of mechanical complications following corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Surgery for degenerative scoliosis (DS) is a complex procedure with high complication and revision rates. Based on the concept that pelvic incidence (PI) is a constant parameter, the global alignment and proportional (GAP) score was developed from sagittal alignment data collected in the Caucasian populations to predict mechanical complications. However, the PI varies among different ethnic groups, and the GAP score may not apply to Chinese populations. Thus, this study aims to assess the predictability of the GAP score for mechanical complications in the Chinese populations and develop an ethnicity-adjusted GAP score.

PURPOSE

To test the predictability of the original GAP score in the Chinese population and develop a Chinese ethnicity-tailored GAP scoring system.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGS

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 560 asymptomatic healthy volunteers were enrolled to develop Chinese ethnicity-tailored GAP (C-GAP) score and a total of 114 DS patients were enrolled to test the predictability of original GAP score and C-GAP score.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographic information, sagittal spinopelvic parameters of healthy volunteers and DS patients were collected. Mechanical complications were recorded at a minimum of 2-year follow-up after corrective surgery for DS patients.

METHODS

A total of 560 asymptomatic healthy volunteers with a mean age of 61.9±14.1 years were enrolled to develop ethnicity-adjusted GAP score. Besides, 114 surgically trated DS patients (M/F=10/104) with a mean age of 60.7±7.1 years were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data and radiological parameters of both groups, including PI, lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and global tilt (GT) were collected. Ideal LL, SS, and GT were obtained by calculating their correlation with PI of healthy volunteers using linear regression analysis. Relative pelvic version (RPV), relative lumbar lordosis (RLL), lordosis distribution index (LDI), and relative spinopelvic alignment (RSA) were obtained using the ideal parameters, and the Chinese population adjusted GAP score (C-GAP) was developed based on these values. The predictability of original and C-GAP for mechanical failure was evaluated using clinical and radiological data of DS patients by evaluating the area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic curve. This study was supported the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 82272545), ($ 8,000-10,000) and the Jiangsu Provincial Key Medical Center, and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M701677), Level B ($ 5,000-7,000).

RESULTS

Ideal SS=0.53×PI+9 (p=.002), ideal LL=0.48×PI+22 (p=.023) and ideal GT=0.46 × PI-9 (p=.011). were obtained by correlation analysis using sagittal parameters from those healthy volunteers, and RPV, RLL, RSA, and LDI were calculated accordingly. Then, the ethnicity-adjusted C-GAP score was developed by summing up the numeric value of calculated RPV, RLL, RSA, and LDI. The AUC was classified as ''no or low discriminatory power'' for the original GAP score in predicting mechanical complications (AUC=0.592, p=.078). Similarly, the original GAP score did not correlate with mechanical complications in DS patients. According to the C-GAP score, the sagittal parameters were proportional in 25 (21.9%) cases, moderately disproportional in 68 (59.6%), and severely disproportional in 21% (18.5%) cases. The incidence of mechanical complications was statistically different among proportioned and moderately disproportional and severely disproportional portions of the C-GAP score (p=.03). The predictability of the C-GAP score is high with an AUC=0.773 (p<.001). In addition, there is a linear correlation between mechanical complication rate and C-GAP score (χ=0.102, p=.02).

CONCLUSION

The Ethnicity-adjusted C-GAP score system developed in the current study provided a more accurate and reliable for predicting the risk of mechanical complications after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Assessing the predictive power of the GAP score on mechanical complications: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The prevention of mechanical complications (MC) is a major concern in adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction surgery; thus, the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score was developed to assess MC risk. Numerous studies have clarified the validity of the GAP score, but their contradictory results have prevented researchers from reaching compelling conclusions. This study aimed to analyze the predictive power of the GAP score on MC via a meta-analysis.

METHODS

A total of 1,617 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Studies relevant to the GAP score and MC were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL and screened according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The GAP score categories of the patients and their MC/revision surgery status were collected. The data collected for the meta-analysis of odds ratios (OR) included the number of patients in the GAP score subgroups and their MC/revision surgery status. To calculate the OR, three GAP score subgroups were combined into two groups; hence, the analysis was conducted twice (gap proportioned [GAP-P] and higher groups, and gap severely disproportioned [GAP-SD] and lower groups).

RESULTS

Eleven studies were collected; of them, revision surgery data were available for seven. The proportion of MC in the studies was 27.7-60.6%, while that of revision surgery was 11.7-34.9%. In the meta-analysis of the GAP-P and higher score groups, the difference in MC ratio was significant (OR = 2.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20-6.67; P = 0.02), whereas that for revision surgery was not. For the GAP-SD and lower score groups, the GAP-SD group had significantly higher proportions of both MC (OR = 2.65; 95% CI = 1.57-4.45; P < 0.001) and revision surgery (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.33-3.88; P = 0.003). Publication bias was significant only in the latter MC analysis.

CONCLUSION

The GAP score offers predictive value for the risk of mechanical complications.

Narrative Review of Clinical Impact of Head-Hip Offset Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

In adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, mechanical failure (MF) has been a significant concern for spine surgeons as well as patients. Despite earnest endeavors to prevent MF, the absence of a definitive consensus persists, owing to the intricate interplay of multifarious factors associated with this complication. Previous approaches centered around global spinal alignment have yielded limited success in entirely forestalling MF. These methodologies, albeit valuable, exhibited limitations by neglecting to encompass global balance and compensatory mechanisms within their purview. In response to this concern, an in-depth comprehension of global balance and compensatory mechanisms emerges as imperative. In this discourse, the center of gravity and the gravity line are gaining attention in recent investigations pertaining to global balance. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the global balance and a comprehensive understanding of related concepts and knowledge. Moreover, it delves into the clinical ramifications of the contemporary optimal correction paradigm to furnish an encompassing understanding of global balance and the current optimal correction strategies within the context of ASD surgery. By doing so, it endeavors to furnish spine surgeons with a guiding compass, enriching their decision-making process as they navigate the intricate terrain of ASD surgical interventions.

PreOperative Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity Goals: Level Selection and Alignment Goals

Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) is a complex pathologic condition with significant impact on quality of life, including pain, loss of function, and fatigue. Achieving realignment goals is crucial for long-term results. Reliable preoperative planning strategies, including nomograms, measurement tools, and level selection, are key to maximizing the likelihood of achieving a good outcome following ASD corrective surgery. This review covers recent literature on such strategies, including review of the different targets for realignment and their association with outcomes (both patients-reported outcomes and complications), selection of upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, and the latest innovation in preoperative planning for deformity surgery.

Algorithmic Patient Selection for Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery

Evidenced-based data-driven decision-making algorithms guide patient and approach selection for adult spinal deformity surgery. Algorithms are continually refined as surgical goals and intraoperative technology evolve.

Analysis of Mechanical Failure Using the GAP Score After Surgery With Lateral and Posterior Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score and mechanical failure (MF) following corrective fusion surgery with planned 2-stage surgery using lateral lumbar interbody fusion in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

Fifty-four patients (2 men, 52 females, aged 70.3 years) were included. MF, proximal junctional failure (PJF), and rod breakage (RB) occurred in 46.3% (25/54), 22.2% (12/54), and 29.6% (16/54) of patients, respectively. The immediate postoperative GAP scores were compared between patients with MF and without MF (MF+ and MF-, respectively). GAP scores in groups with and without PJF or RB were also compared.

RESULTS

Patients were grouped according to the GAP score for spinopelvic alignment: 23 (42.6%) as proportioned, 22 (40.7%) as moderately disproportioned, and 9 (16.7%) as severely disproportioned. The pre- and postoperative spinopelvic parameters did not differ significantly between the MF- and MF+ groups except pelvic incidence. Postoperatively, the mean pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis changed to <10° in both groups. The GAP score and 3 categories of GAP scores did not differ significantly between the PJF- and PJF+ groups or between the RB+ and RB- groups.

CONCLUSION

Multiple factors can cause PJF and RB, and the patient's background may affect the ability to use the GAP score to predict MF. Further research may be needed in the future using modified GAP scores with additional factors in ASD patients.

Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery - Review of Risk Factors and Its Prevention

Proximal junction kyphosis (PJK) is a common imaging finding after long-level fusion, and proximal junctional failure (PJF) is an aggravated form of the progressive disease spectrum of PJK. This includes vertebral fracture of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1, instability between UIV and UIV+1, neurological deterioration requiring surgery. Many studies have reported on PJK and PJF after long segment instrumentation for adult spinal deformity (ASD). In particular, for spine deformity surgeons, risk factors and prevention strategies of PJK and PJF are very important to minimize reoperation. Therefore, this review aims to help reduce the occurrence of PJK and PJF by updating the latest contents of PJK and PJF by 2023, focusing on the risk factors and prevention strategies of PJK and PJF. We conducted a search on multiple database for articles published until February 2023 using the search keywords "proximal junctional kyphosis," "proximal junctional failure," "proximal junctional disease," and "adult spinal deformity." Finally, 103 papers were included in this study. Numerous factors have been suggested as potential risks for the development of PJK and PJF, including a high body mass index, inadequate postoperative sagittal balance and overcorrection, advanced age, pelvic instrumentation, and osteoporosis. Recently, with the increasing elderly population, sarcopenia has been emphasized. The quality and quantity of muscle in the surgical site have been suggested as new risk factor. Therefore, spine surgeon should understand the pathophysiology of PJK and PJF, as well as individual risk factors, in order to develop appropriate prevention strategies for each patient.

Proximal Junction Failure in Spine Surgery: Integrating Geometrical and Biomechanical Global Descriptors Improves GAP Score-Based Assessment

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

Biomechanical and geometrical descriptors are used to improve global alignment and proportion (GAP) prediction accuracy to detect proximal junctional failure (PJF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PJF is probably the most important complication after sagittal imbalance surgery. The GAP score has been introduced as an effective predictor for PJF, but it fails in certain situations. In this study, 112 patient records were gathered (57 PJF; 55 controls) with biomechanical and geometrical descriptors measured to stratify control and failure cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Biplanar EOS radiographs were used to build 3-dimensional full-spine models and determine spinopelvic sagittal parameters. The bending moment (BM) was calculated as the upper body mass times, the effective distance to the body center of mass at the adjacent upper instrumented vertebra +1. Other geometrical descriptors such as full balance index (FBI), spino-sacral angle (SSA), C7 plumb line/sacrofemoral distance ratio (C7/SFD ratio), T1-pelvic angle (TPA), and cervical inclination angle (CIA) were also evaluated. The respective abilities of the GAP, FBI, SSA, C7/SFD, TPA, CIA, body weight, body mass index, and BM to discriminate PJF cases were analyzed through receiver operating characteristic curves and corresponding areas under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

GAP (AUC = 0.8816) and FBI (AUC = 0.8933) were able to discriminate PJF cases but the highest discrimination power (AUC = 0.9371) was achieved with BM at upper instrumented vertebra + 1. Parameter cutoff analyses provided quantitative thresholds to characterize the control and failure groups and led to improved PJF discrimination, with GAP and BM being the most important contributors. SSA (AUC = 0.2857), C7/SFD (AUC = 0.3143), TPA (AUC = 0.5714), CIA (AUC = 0.4571), body weight (AUC = 0.6319), and body mass index (AUC = 0.7716) did not adequately predict PJF.

CONCLUSION

BM reflects the quantitative biomechanical effect of external loads and can improve GAP accuracy. Sagittal alignments and mechanical integrated scores could be used to better prognosticate the risk of PJF.

Should Global Realignment Be Tailored to Frailty Status for Patients Undergoing Surgical Intervention for Adult Spinal Deformity?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Assess whether modifying spinal alignment goals to accommodate frailty considerations will decrease mechanical complications and maximize clinical outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score was developed to assist in reducing mechanical complications, but has had less success predicting such events in external validation. Higher frailty and many of its components have been linked to the development of implant failure. Therefore, modifying the GAP score with frailty may strengthen its ability to predict mechanical complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 412 surgical ASD patients with two-year follow-up. Frailty was quantified using the modified Adult Spinal Deformity Frailty Index (mASD-FI). Outcomes: proximal junctional kyphosis and proximal junctional failure (PJF), major mechanical complications, and "Best Clinical Outcome" (BCO), defined as Oswestry Disability Index<15 and Scoliosis Research Society 22-item Questionnaire Total>4.5. Logistic regression analysis established a six-week score based on GAP score, frailty, and Oswestry Disability Index US Norms. Logistic regression followed by conditional inference tree analysis generated categorical thresholds. Multivariable logistic regression analysis controlling for confounders was used to assess the performance of the frailty-modified GAP score.

RESULTS

Baseline frailty categories: 57% not frail, 30% frail, 14% severely frail. Overall, 39 of patients developed proximal junctional kyphosis, 8% PJF, 21% mechanical complications, 22% underwent reoperation, and 15% met BCO. The mASD-FI demonstrated a correlation with developing PJF, mechanical complications, undergoing reoperation, and meeting BCO at two years (all P <0.05). Regression analysis generated the following equation: Frailty-Adjusted Realignment Score (FAR Score)=0.49×mASD-FI+0.38×GAP Score. Thresholds for the FAR score (0-13): proportioned: <3.5, moderately disproportioned: 3.5-7.5, severely disproportioned: >7.5. Multivariable logistic regression assessing FAR score demonstrated associations with mechanical complications, reoperation, and meeting BCO by two years (all P <0.05), whereas the original GAP score was only significant for reoperation.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated adjusting alignment goals in adult spinal deformity surgery for a patient's baseline frailty status and disability may be useful in minimizing the risk of complications and adverse events, outperforming the original GAP score in terms of prognostic capacity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Sagittal realignment: surgical restoration of the global alignment and proportion score parameters: a subgroup analysis. What are the consequences of failing to realign?

INTRODUCTION

The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score incorporates three domains directly modified with surgery (relative pelvic version-RPV, relative lumbar lordosis-RLL, lumbar distribution index-LDI) and one indirectly restored (relative spinopelvic alignment-RSA). We analyzed our surgical realignment performance and the consequences of domain-specific realignment failure on mechanical complications and PROMs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From an adult spinal deformity prospective multicenter database, we selected patients: fused to pelvis, upper instrumented vertebra at or above L1, and 2 years of follow-up. Descriptive, univariate and multivariate analyses were employed.

RESULTS

The sample included 333 patients. RLL-6w showed the highest success rate (58.3% aligned), but 16.5% of patients were classified in the "Severe hypolordosis" and "Hyperlordosis" subgroups. RPV-6w was the most challenging to realign, with 51.6% moderate or severe retroversion. Regarding RSA-6w, 21.9% had severe positive malalignment. Correct alignment of RPV-6w (p = 0.025) and RSA-6w (p = 0.002) proved to be protective factors against the development of mechanical complications. Severe pelvic retroversion (p = 0.026) and severe positive malalignment (p = 0.007) were risk factors for mechanical complications. RSA-6w "Severe positive malalignment" was associated with less improvement in PROMs: ∆ODI (8.83 vs 17.2; p = 0.011), ∆SRS-22 total (0.54 vs 0.87; p = 0.007), and ∆SF-36PCS (3.47 vs 7.76; p = 0.04); MCID for ODI (37.0 vs 55.5%; p = 0.023), and SRS-22 (40.8 vs 60.1%; p = 0.015); and PASS for ODI (17.6 vs 31.7%; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

RPV was the most underperformed modifiable parameter. Severe pelvic retroversion and severe positive malalignment influenced the occurrence of mechanical complications. Severe positive malalignment affected PROMs improvement.

The Impact of Global Alignment and Proportion Score and Bracing on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to examine the relationship between global alignment and proportion (GAP) score and postoperative orthoses with likelihood of developing proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).

METHODS

Patients who underwent thoracic or lumbar fusions of ≥4 levels for adult spinal deformity (ASD) with 1-year post-operative alignment x-rays were included. Chart review was conducted to determine spinopelvic alignment parameters, PJK, and reoperation.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were included; baseline and 1-year postoperative alignment did not differ between patients with and without PJK. There was no PJK in 53.1%, 29.6% had PJK from 10-20°, and 17.3% had severe PJK over 20° (sPJK). At baseline, 80% of patients had severely disproportioned GAP, 13.75% moderate, 6.25% proportioned. GAP improved across the population, but improved GAP was not associated with sPJK. Greater correction of the upper instrumented vertebra to pelvic angle (UIV-PA) was associated with a larger PJK angle (PJKA) change (R = -0.28) as was the 1 year T1-upper instrumented vertebra (T1-UIV) angle (R = 0.30), both P < .05. GAP change was not correlated with PJKA change. Postoperative orthoses were used in 46% of patients and did not impact sPJK.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no correlation between PJK and GAP or change in GAP. Greater correction of UIV-PA and larger postop T1-UIV was associated with greater PJKA change; suggesting that the greater alignment correction led to greater likelihood of failure. Postoperative orthoses had no impact on PJK.

Mechanical complications and reoperations after adult spinal deformity surgery: a clinical analysis with the GAP score

PURPOSE

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is prone to postoperative complications, leading to high reoperation rates. The global alignment and proportion (GAP) score is a novel method to predict mechanical complications (MC) based on the optimal parameters related to individual pelvic incidence. The aim of this study was to determine the cut-off point and the predictive value of the GAP score for those MCs that require reoperation. A secondary aim was to investigate the cumulative incidence of MCs requiring reoperation during a long follow-up period.

METHODS

In total, 144 ASD patients were operated at our institution due to marked symptomatic spinal deformity between 2008 and 2020. The cut-off point and the predictive value of the GAP score for the MCs that required reoperation and the cumulative incidence of reoperated MCs after index surgery were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were included in the analysis. The risk for having an MC that required reoperation was significantly lower when the postoperative GAP score was < 5 (HR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.40-9.02). The discriminative power of the GAP score to predict MCs that require reoperation was good with an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.58-0.81). The cumulative incidence of reoperated MCs was 18%.

CONCLUSION

The GAP score was associated with the risk for MCs that require reoperation. The best predictive value for surgically treated MC was with the GAP score [Formula: see text] 5. The cumulative incidence of the reoperated MCs was 18%.

Use of the Global Alignment and Proportion score to predict postoperative health-related quality of life in adult spinal deformity surgery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to validate the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score as a predictor of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes for patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with ASD undergoing long-segment spine fusions (≥ 5 vertebrae fused) at a single institution over a 2-year period (n = 85). Radiographic parameters were measured at preoperative, 6-week postoperative, 1-year postoperative, and 2-year postoperative visits. GAP scores were calculated using 4 sagittal parameters: relative pelvic version, relative lumbar lordosis, lordosis distribution index, and relative spinopelvic alignment. Patients were stratified into 3 GAP categories at each time point: proportioned (score 0-2), moderately disproportioned (score 3-6), and severely disproportioned (score ≥ 7). HRQOL outcomes were collected at preoperative, 1-year postoperative, and 2-year postoperative visits; these measures included patient self-reported outcome measures (i.e., PROMIS), Scoliosis Research Society-22 spinal deformity questionnaire (SRS-22), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores.

RESULTS

Overall, 42% of cases were revision surgeries and 96.5% of patients underwent fusion to the sacrum. The mean preoperative GAP score significantly improved from preoperative (7.84) to immediate postoperative (3.31) assessment (p < 0.001). Similarly, the percentage of patients categorized as proportioned improved from 9.4% at preoperative to 45.9% at immediate postoperative evaluation. The preoperative GAP score or category was not significantly associated with any preoperative HRQOL outcome metrics. The immediate postoperative GAP score was not correlated with any 1-year HRQOL outcomes. However, the immediate postoperative GAP score was significantly associated with 2-year SRS-22 outcomes, including SRS-22 function (r = -0.35, p < 0.01), self-image (r = -0.27, p = 0.044), and subtotal (r = -0.35, p < 0.01) scores. As compared to severely disproportioned patients, proportioned patients had better SRS-22 pain (4.08 vs 3.17, p = 0.04), satisfaction (4.40 vs 3.50, p = 0.02), and subtotal (4.01 vs 3.27, p = 0.036) scores. The immediate postoperative GAP score was also significantly associated with 2-year PROMIS outcomes, including PROMIS pain (r = 0.31, p = 0.023) and physical function (r = -0.35, p < 0.01) scores. As compared to severely disproportioned patients, proportioned patients had better PROMIS pain (53.18 vs 63.60, p = 0.025) and physical function (41.66 vs 34.18, p = 0.017) scores. Postoperative GAP score or category did not predict any ODI outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative GAP score is a predictor of long-term HRQOL outcomes following ASD surgery, and proportioned patients are more likely to have less pain and be satisfied with their surgery. However, the postoperative GAP score does not predict outcomes as measured by ODI.

Association between sagittal alignment and loads at the adjacent segment in the fused spine: a combined clinical and musculoskeletal modeling study of 205 patients with adult spinal deformity

PURPOSE

Sagittal malalignment is a risk factor for mechanical complications after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). Spinal loads, modulated by sagittal alignment, may explain this relationship. The aims of this study were to investigate the relationships between: (1) postoperative changes in loads at the proximal segment and realignment, and (2) absolute postoperative loads and postoperative alignment measures.

METHODS

A previously validated musculoskeletal model of the whole spine was applied to study a clinical sample of 205 patients with ASD. Based on clinical and radiographic data, pre-and postoperative patient-specific alignments were simulated to predict loads at the proximal segment adjacent to the spinal fusion.

RESULTS

Weak-to-moderate associations were found between pre-to-postop changes in lumbar lordosis, LL (r =  - 0.23, r =  - 0.43; p < 0.001), global tilt, GT (r = 0.26, r = 0.38; p < 0.001) and the Global Alignment and Proportion score, GAP (r = 0.26, r = 0.37; p < 0.001), and changes in compressive and shear forces at the proximal segment. GAP score parameters, thoracic kyphosis measurements and the slope of upper instrumented vertebra were associated with changes in shear. In patients with T10-pelvis fusion, moderate-to-strong associations were found between postoperative sagittal alignment measures and compressive and shear loads, with GT showing the strongest correlations (r = 0.75, r = 0.73, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal loads were estimated for patient-specific full spinal alignment profiles in a large cohort of patients with ASD pre-and postoperatively. Loads on the proximal segments were greater in association with sagittal malalignment and malorientation of proximal vertebra. Future work should explore whether they provide a causative mechanism explaining the associated risk of proximal junction complications.

The Effects of Global Alignment and Proportionality Scores on Postoperative Outcomes After Adult Spinal Deformity Correction

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested achieving global alignment and proportionality (GAP) alignment may influence mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between the GAP score and mechanical complications after ASD surgery.

METHODS

Patients with ASD with at least 5-level fusion to pelvis and minimum 2-year data were included. Multivariate analysis was used to find an association between proportioned (P), GAP-moderately disproportioned, and severely disproportioned (GAP-SD) states and mechanical complications (inclusive of proximal junctional kyphosis [PJK], proximal junctional failure [PJF], and implant-related complications [IC]). Severe sagittal deformity was defined by a "++" in the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab criteria for sagittal vertebral axis or pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety patients with ASD were included. Controlling for age, Charlson comorbidity index, invasiveness and baseline deformity, and multivariate analysis showed no association of GAP-moderately disproportioned patients with proximal junctional kyphosis, PJF, or IC, while GAP-SD patients showed association with IC (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7, [1.1-3.3]; P = .043). Aligning in GAP-relative pelvic version led to lower likelihood of all 3 mechanical complications (all P < .04). In patients with severe sagittal deformity, GAP-SD was predictive of IC (OR: 2.1, [1.1-4.7]; P = .047), and in patients 70 years and older, GAP-SD was also predictive of PJF development (OR: 2.5, [1.1-14.9]; P = .045), while improving in GAP led to lower likelihood of PJF (OR: 0.2, [0.02-0.8]; P = .023).

CONCLUSION

Severely disproportioned in GAP is associated with development of any IC and junctional failure specifically in older patients and those with severe baseline deformity. Therefore, incorporation of patient-specific factors into realignment goals may better strengthen the utility of this novel tool.

Does the Global Alignment and Proportion score predict mechanical complications in circumferential minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity?

OBJECTIVE

The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score was developed to serve as a tool to predict mechanical complication probability in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD), serving as an aid for setting surgical goals to decrease the prevalence of mechanical complications in ASD surgery. However, it was developed using ASD patients for whom open surgical techniques were used for correction. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the applicability of the score for patients undergoing circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) for correction of ASD.

METHODS

Study participants were patients undergoing cMIS ASD surgery without the use of osteotomies with a minimum of four levels fused and 2 years of follow-up. Postoperative GAP scores were calculated for all patients, and the association with mechanical failure was analyzed.

RESULTS

The authors identified 182 patients who underwent cMIS correction of ASD. Mechanical complications were found in 11.1% of patients with proportioned spinopelvic states, 20.5% of patients with moderately disproportioned spinopelvic states, and 18.8% of patients with severely disproportioned spinopelvic states. Analysis with a chi-square test showed a significant difference between the cMIS and original GAP study cohorts in the moderately disproportioned and severely disproportioned spinopelvic states, but not in the proportioned spinopelvic states.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients stratified into proportioned, moderately disproportioned, and severely disproportioned spinopelvic states, the GAP score predicted 6%, 47%, and 95% mechanical complication rates, respectively. The mechanical complication rate in patients undergoing cMIS ASD correction did not correlate with the calculated GAP spinopelvic state.

The postoperative course of mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery

PURPOSE

(a) Describe the time course of each mechanical complication, and (b) compare radiographic measurements and preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among each mechanical complication type.

METHODS

A single-institution case-control study was undertaken of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery from 2009-2017. Exposure variables included patient demographics, operative variables, radiographic measurements, and preoperative PROMs, including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Rating Scale Back/Leg-pain scores (NRS-Back/Leg), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). The primary outcomes were occurrence of a mechanical complication and time to complication. Due to overlapping occurrence, rod fracture and pseudarthrosis were grouped into one composite category.

RESULTS

145 patients underwent ASD surgery and were followed for at least 2 years. 30/47 (63.8%) patients with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) required reoperation, whereas 27/31 (87.1%) patients with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture required reoperation (63.8% vs. 87.1%, Χ² = -0.23, 95% CI -0.41, -0.05, p = 0.023). Cox regression showed no significant difference in time to reoperation between PJK and rod fracture/pseudarthrosis (HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.85-1.11, p = 0.686). Distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) (N = 3; 2 reoperation) and implant failures (N = 4; 0 reoperations) were rare. Patients with PJK had significantly lower Hounsfield Units preoperatively compared to those with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture (138.2 ± 43.8 vs. 160.3 ± 41.0, mean difference (MD) =  -22.1, 95% CI -41.8, -2.4, p = 0.028), more prior fusions (51.1% vs. 25.8%, Χ² = 0.253, 95% CI 0.41, 0.46, p = 0.026), fewer instrumented vertebrae (9.2 ± 2.6 vs. 10.7 ± 2.5, MD =  -1.5, 95% CI -2.7, -0.31, p = 0.013), and higher postoperative thoracic kyphosis (TK) (46.3 ± 12.7 vs. 34.9 ± 10.6, MD = 11.4, 95% CI 5.9, 16.9, p < 0.001). Higher postoperative C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) did not achieve a significant difference (80.7 ± 72.1 vs. 51.9 ± 57.3, MD = 28.8, 95% CI -1.9, 59.5, p = 0.066). No differences were seen in preoperative PROMs.

CONCLUSION

Patients with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture had a higher reoperation rate compared to those with PJK with similar time to reoperation. Moreover, patients with PJK had higher postoperative TK, lower Hounsfield Units, more prior fusions, and fewer instrumented levels compared to those with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture. The results of this single-institution study suggest that even though mechanical complications are often analyzed as a single group, important differences may exist between them.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

GAP score potential in predicting post-operative spinal mechanical complications: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

In 2017, the GAP score was proposed as a tool to reduce mechanical complications (MC) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery: the reported MC rate for the GAP proportioned category was only 6%, which is clearly lower to the MC rate reported in the literature. The aim of this study is to analyse if the most recent literature confirms the promising results of the original article.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the PRISMA flow chart, we reviewed the literature to analyse GAP score capacity in predicting MC occurrence. We included articles clearly reporting ASD surgery MC stratified by GAP categories and the score's overall capacity to predict MC using the area under the curve (AUC). The quality of the included studies was evaluated using GRADE and MINORS systems.

RESULTS

Eleven retrospective articles (1,517 patients in total) were included. The MC distribution per GAP category was as follows: GAP-P, 32.8%; GAP-MD, 42.3%; GAP-SD, 55.4%. No statistically significant difference was observed between the different categories using the Kruskal-Wallis test (p = 0.08) and the two-by-two Pearson-Chi square test (P Vs MD, p = 0.300; P Vs SD, p = 0.275; MD Vs SD, p = 0.137). The global AUC was 0.68 ± 0.2 (moderate accuracy). The included studies were of poor quality according to the GRADE system and had a high risk of bias based on the MINORS criteria.

CONCLUSION

The actual literature does not corroborate the excellent results reported by the original GAP score article. Further prospective studies, possibly stratified by type of MC and type of surgery, are necessary to validate this score.

Age and Gender Based Spinopelvic and Regional Spinal Alignment in Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers: Results of the Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS)

BACKGROUND

Spinal alignment can have a significant impact on a patient's overall quality of life. Predicting the ideal sagittal spinal alignment of a specific individual is still a difficult task. The Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) investigated skeletal alignment, including the spine and lower extremities, of the largest multi-ethnic cohort of asymptomatic adult volunteers. In this analysis, the authors aim to assess normative values of spinopelvic parameters and the regional cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal alignment in asymptomatic volunteers stratified by age and sex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Asymptomatic volunteers between ages 18 and 80 years were enrolled prospectively from centers in France, Japan, Singapore, Tunisia, and the United States. Volunteers included reported no significant neck or back pain (Visual Analog Scale ≤2), nor any known spinal disorder(s). All volunteers underwent a standing full-body or full-spine low-dose stereoradiograph.

RESULTS

MEANS consisted of 468 volunteers with a mean age of 40.4±14.8 years. Mean cervical lordosis from C2 to C7 was -0.4±12.7°. The T1-slope averaged 23.0±7.9° and showed strong correlation ( r =0.87) with the C7-slope mean of 19.8±8.6°. Thoracic kyphosis (TK) from T4 to T12 showed a mean of 37.4±10.9°. Average L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) was -57.4±11.3°. The mean pelvic incidence (PI) measured 52.0±10.7° and pelvic tilt was 12.5±7.3°. Sacral slope averaged 39.5±8.2°. The average PI-LL was -5.4±10.7°. Approximately 60% of volunteers met the PI-LL criteria within ±10°, 8.3% were ≥10°, while 32.1% were ≤-10°. LL showed moderate correlation with PI ( r =0.53) and TK ( r =0.50), while there was no correlation between TK and PI. Multiple linear regression including PI, TK, and age resulted in the following equation LL=14.6+0.57 (PI)+0.57 (TK)-0.2 (age) ( r =0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

LL did not change with increasing age in asymptomatic volunteers. However, TK did increase with age leading to an increase in T1-slope and a compensatory increase in cervical lordosis. TK did not correlate with PI and was an independent variable in the prediction of LL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-prospective cohort study.

The T4-L1-Hip Axis: Defining a Normal Sagittal Spinal Alignment

STUDY DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to describe sagittal plane alignment and balance in a multinational cohort of nondegenerated, asymptomatic adults.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Current sagittal alignment targets were developed using correlations between radiographic and quality-of-life measures in spinal deformity patients, rather than disease-free samples leading to relatively poor accounting for variance within a population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sagittal balance was defined using vertebral body tilt and spinopelvic alignment was defined as the vertebral pelvic angles from C2 to L5 (vertebral pelvic angle=vertebral tilt+pelvic tilt). Associations with pelvic incidence (PI) were assessed using linear regression. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate a normal L1-S1 lordosis, adjusting for PI and the L1 pelvic angle (L1PA). Correlation between the L1 and T4 pelvic angles was assessed to define a normal thoracic alignment conditioned on lumbar alignment.

RESULTS

Among 320 volunteers from 4 continents, median age was 37% and 60% were female. C2 tilt was independent of PI with minimal variation. PI was inadequate for estimating a normal lumbar lordosis (L1-S1, r2 =0.3), but was strongly associated with the lumbar pelvic angles (L1PA, r2 =0.58). Defining lumbar lordosis as a function of PI and L1PA resulted in high explained variance ( R2 =0.74) and the T4 pelvic angle had near perfect correlation with the L1PA ( r =0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

We defined normal sagittal balance and spinopelvic alignment in a disease-free international volunteer cohort. Four parameters are either fixed or directly modifiable in surgery and can define a normal thoracic and lumbar alignment: the L1-S1 lordosis defined as a function of PI and the L1PA; and the T4 pelvic angle is nearly equivalent to the L1PA, aligning the T4-L1-hip axis.

Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score in asymptomatic individuals: is it universal?

BACKGROUND

The global alignment and proportion (GAP) score was established based on American and European subjects, which might limit its applicability to the Chinese population due to ethnicity-related difference of sagittal alignment.

PURPOSE

To analyze the applicability of GAP score in the Chinese population and to investigate the age- and gender-associated differences of spinopelvic and GAP score parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cross-sectional radiographic study.

PATIENTS SAMPLE

Of 692 asymptomatic Chinese volunteers aged between 20 and 79 prospectively recruited between January 2017 and June 2019, 490 subjects were eventually included in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), L1-S1 lordosis, L4-S1 lordosis, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA) and global tilt (GT) were measured on lateral X-rays. The GAP scores and its parameters including relative pelvic version (RPV), relative lumbar lordosis (RLL), lordosis distribution index (LDI) and relative spinopelvic alignment (RSA) were calculated for each subject.

METHODS

Subjects were divided into four groups: Group 1M: male subjects <60 years old; Group 1F: female subjects <60 years old; Group 2M: male subjects ≥60 years old and Group 2F: female subjects ≥60 years old. The GAP scores and categories were determined and compared between groups. The results of sagittal alignment were compared with the previous studies evaluating the normative sagittal alignment in other populations. Univariate linear regression analysis was carried out between pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL) and global tilt (GT) in each group.

RESULTS

The distributions of GAP categories and the updated Roussouly classification were statistically different from other populations. Significantly different distribution of GAP categories was observed between Group 1M and Group 2M, Group 1F and Group 2F, and Group 1M and Group 1F. Radiographic measurements and GAP parameters were significantly different between Group 1M and Group 2M, and Group 1F and Group 2F. Gender-related difference of parameters was more prominent between Group 1M and Group 1F. Linear relationship of PI with SS, LL and GT were different from the regression models of "ideal" sagittal alignment in GAP score.

CONCLUSIONS

The GAP score might be inappropriate in Chinese population due to ethnicity-related alignment difference. Worse feasibility of GAP score was observed in female and old subjects.

A Patient-specific Approach to Alignment and Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Risk Assessment in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Development and Validation of a Predictive Tool

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-institution, retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop a predictive model for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) severity that considers multiple preoperative variables and modifiable surgical alignment.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PJK is a common complication following adult deformity surgery. Current alignment targets account for age and pelvic incidence but not other risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of adult deformity patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up undergoing instrumented fusion between 2009 and 2018. A proportional odds regression model was fit to estimate PJK probability and Hart-International Spine Study Group (ISSG) PJK severity score. Predictors included preoperative Charlson Comorbidity Index, vertebral Hounsfield Units near the upper instrumented vertebrae, pelvic incidence, T1-pelvic angle, and postoperative L1-L4 and L4-S1 lordosis. Predictor effects were assessed using adjusted odds ratios and a nomogram constructed for estimating PJK probability. Bootstrap resampling was used for internal validation.

RESULTS

Of 145 patients, 47 (32%) developed PJK. The median PJK severity score was 6 (interquartile range, 4-7.5). After adjusting for predictors, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Hounsfield Units, preoperative T1-pelvic angle, and postoperative L1-L4 and L4-S1 lordosis were significantly associated with PJK severity ( P <0.05). After adjusting for potential overfitting, the model showed acceptable discrimination [ C -statistic (area under the curve)=0.75] and accuracy (Brier score=0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a model to predict PJK probability, adjusted for preoperative alignment, comorbidity burden, vertebral bone density, and modifiable postoperative L1-L4 and L4-S1 lordosis. This approach may help surgeons assess the patient-specific risk of developing PJK and provide a framework for future predictive models assessing PJK risk after adult deformity surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The impact of lumbar alignment targets on mechanical complications after adult lumbar scoliosis surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the discriminatory ability of age-adjusted alignment offset and the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score parameters to predict postoperative mechanical complications.

METHODS

Surgical patients from the Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis cohort were reviewed at 2 year follow up. Age-adjusted alignment offsets and GAP parameters were calculated for each patient. A series of nonlinear logistic regression models were fit, and the odds of mechanical complications were calculated. The discriminatory ability of the GAP score, GAP score parameters, and age-adjusted alignment offsets were determined plotting receiver operative characteristic (ROC) with the C statistic (AUC).

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients were included. A total of 49 mechanical complications occurred in 41 patients (21 proximal junctional kyphosis and 28 pseudoarthrosis). The GAP score had no discriminatory ability in this cohort. Relative lumbar lordosis 15 degrees greater than ideal lumbar lordosis was associated with greater mechanical complications. A lumbar distribution index of 90% was associated with fewer mechanical complications compared to a lumbar distribution index of 65%. Age-adjusted offset alignment targets had no discriminatory ability to predict mechanical complications.

CONCLUSION

Radiographic alignment targets using either age-adjusted alignment target offset or GAP score parameters had minimal ability to predict mechanical complications in isolation. Mechanical complications following adult spinal deformity surgery are complex, and patient factors play a critical role. Clinical trial registeration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00854828) in March 2009.

Relationship Between Hounsfield Units of Upper Instrumented Vertebrae, Proximal Junctional Failure, and Global Alignment and Proportion Score in Female Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate bone mineral density using Hounsfield unit (HU) values at the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV), UIV+1, and UIV+2 and to investigate the association with proximal junctional failure (PJF) in female patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). We also evaluated the relationship between the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score and the HU value of patients after ASD surgery.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients (52 females, mean age =70.2 years) who underwent multiple-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior instrumentation for ASD were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups, PJF and non-PJF. The demographics, surgical characteristics, and radiographic parameters were compared. Vertebral HU values at UIV, UIV+1, and UIV+2 using preoperative computed tomography scans and immediate postoperative GAP scores were also compared.

RESULTS

PJF was found in 13 of 52 patients (25.0%). Preoperative and postoperative thoracic kyphosis was large in PJF patients. Based on the total GAP score, there was no significant difference among the categories of GAP scores (P = 0.514). The statistically significant difference in mean HU values (116.6 ± 28.1 vs. 141.8 ± 41.8, P = 0.049) between the two groups at UIV. Further correlation analysis showed that the mean HU values in UIV and UIV+1 showed a significantly negative correlation coefficient with the total GAP score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that preoperative HU values at UIV may affect the development of PJF for female ASD patients. HU evaluation by preoperative computed tomography may help reduce the incidence of PJF.

Improvement and International Validation of the Predictive Probability of the Patient Demographics, Radiographic Index, and Surgical Invasiveness for Mechanical Failure (PRISM) Model for Preventive Procedures in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

This is an international multicenter retrospective review of 219 surgically treated consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients who had a minimum of five fused segments, completed a 2-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to add the indices of preventive procedures to improve and to validate the predictive probability of the PRISM (patient demographics, radiographic index, and surgical invasiveness for mechanical failure) for mechanical failure (MF) following ASD surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The PRISM was developed from the data of 321 ASD patients, which stratified the risk of MF from six types of risk.

METHODS

Data from 136 Japanese ASD patients (age 49 ± 21 yr, 88% female) were used to develop PRISM2, and data from 83 US ASD patients (age 58 ± 12 yr, 86% female) were used for the external validation. We analyzed the associations between three preventive procedures (UIV+1 tethering [TH], teriparatide [TP], and multirod [MR]) and MF by multivariate logistic regression analysis (MRA). The values for the nearest integer of the β of the procedures were added to the six indices of the original PRISM to establish the PRISM2. The discriminative ability of the PRISM/ PRISM2 for MF was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the precision-recall (PR) curve. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to analyze the trend between PRISM/PRISM2 scores and MF.

RESULTS

MF developed in 25% (34 cases). The β values for the preventive procedures calculated by MRA were TH: -2.5, TP: -3.0, and MR: -2.1. The Cochran-Armitage test showed an excellent trend between MF and PRISM/2. The diagnostic ability was superior for the PRISM2 compared with the PRISM (PRISM2; AUC = 0.94 [0.90-0.98], PRISM; AUC = 0.87 [0.81-0.93], difference = -0.07 [-0.11 to -0.03], P  < 0.01). The AUC of the PRISM2 was 0.70 [0.59-0.81, P < 0.01] in the US patient cohort.

CONCLUSION

We refined the PRISM by adding preventive procedures to the risk indices. Further validation and adjustment in a large different patient cohorts may improve the predictive probability of PRISM2.Level of Evidence: 3.

Sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) for adult spinal deformity (ASD) more effectively predicts surgical outcomes and proximal junctional kyphosis than previous classifications

BACKGROUND

Several methodologies have been proposed to determine ideal ASD sagittal spinopelvic alignment (SRS-Schwab classification) global alignment and proportion (GAP) score, patient age-adjusted alignment). A recent study revealed the ability and limitations of these methodologies to predict PJK. The aim of the study was to develop a new approach, inspired by SRS classification, GAP score, and age-alignment to improve the evaluation of the sagittal plane.

METHOD

A multi-center ASD database was retrospectively evaluated for surgically treated ASD patients with complete fusion of the lumbar spine, and minimum 2 year follow-up. The Sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) methodology was created by assigning numerical values to the difference between each patient's postoperative sagittal alignment and ideal alignment defined by previously reported age generational norms for PI-LL, PT, and TPA. Postoperative HRQOL and PJK severity between each SAAS categories were evaluated.

RESULTS

409 of 667 (61.3%) patients meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated. At 2 year SAAS score showed that 27.0% of the patients were under-corrected, 51.7% over-corrected, and 21.3% matched their age-adjusted target. SAAS score increased as PJK worsened (from SAAS = 0.2 for no-PJK, to 4.0 for PJF, p < 0.001). Post-operatively, HRQOL differences between SAAS groups included ODI, SRS pain, and SRS total.

CONCLUSION

Inspired by SRS classification, the concept of the GAP score, and age-adjusted alignment targets, the results demonstrated significant association with PJK and patient reported outcomes. With a lower rate of failure and better HRQOL, the SAAS seems to represent a "sweet spot" to optimize HRQOL while mitigating the risk of mechanical complications.

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity correction: Clinical and radiographic risk factors for early instrumentation failure

BACKGROUND

Early instrumentation failure (EIF) after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a known complication of adult spine deformity (ASD) correction. In contrast to the more common failure that occurs secondary to pseudarthrosis, early instrumentation failure (<6 months after surgery) and its risk factors are not as well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for EIF in patients undergoing PSO for ASD correction.

METHODS

Patients with ASD who underwent correction with PSO from 2013 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic characteristics, number of rods, spinopelvic parameters, bone density derived from computed tomography (CT) attenuation in Hounsfield units (HU), Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score, and type of instrumentation failure were evaluated. Potential risk factors for EIF were analyzed.

RESULTS

9 out of 46 (19.5%) patients who underwent PSO had EIF. All 9 patients with EIF had 2-rod constructs and failed secondary to rod fracture. The number of rods used in the EIF group was significantly lower than the non-EIF group (2.00 ± 0.00 vs 2.81 ± 0.995, p = .000. The EIF group demonstrated a significantly higher pre-op PI (77.33 ± 13.23), p = .022, pre-op PT (37.22 ± 6.46),p = .012, and post-op SVA (89.96 ± 23.85), p = .028 compared to the non-EIF group.

CONCLUSION

High pre-op PI, pre-op PT, and post-op SVA were significant risk factors associated with EIF after PSO. Use of multiple rod constructs are protective and may help mitigate risk of EIF in these patients.

Rationale and techniques for Posterior Opening Wedge Osteotomy (POWO) in proximal junctional failure due to iatrogenic lumbar hyperlordosis

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a compensatory phenomenon in reaction to pathologic lumbar hyperlordosis. Inappropriate spinal curve harmony incurs risk of PJK. Postoperative failure of posterior instrumentation, with kyphosis resistant to revision surgery at the proximal junction, may be caused by excessive iatrogenic lumbar lordosis. The surgical attitude should be to decrease lumbar lordosis by posterior opening wedge osteotomy (POWO). We describe the rationale for POWO and surgical techniques at L3. The technique is illustrated by a case report at 24 months' follow-up. Based on rational analysis of the distribution of lordosis along the lumbar spine and of adaptation of the sitting position, POWO may be indicated to avoid PJK after revision surgery in adult spinal Deformation revision surgery.

Evaluation of global alignment and proportion score in an independent database

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Sagittal spinopelvic alignment has been associated with patient-reported outcome measures and mechanical complication rates. Recently, it was claimed that linear numerical values of pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis measurements may be misleading for patients that have different magnitudes of pelvic incidence. The use of "relative" measurements embedded in a weighted scoring of Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) was proposed.

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the GAP scorein an independent database.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective Cohort Study PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult spinal deformity patients who underwent ≥7 levels posterior fusion to the pelvis between 2004 and 2014 were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Mechanical Complication Rates.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, surgical and radiographic patient characteristics were recorded. Cochran-Armitage tests were used to compare mechanical complication rates in GAP categories. Uni and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to obtain crude and adjusted Odds Ratios, of predictor (GAP categories) and the outcome (mechanical complication), and Risk Ratios were calculated. The diagnostic performance of the GAP score was tested using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy in predicting mechanical complications.

RESULTS

A total of 322 patients (285F, 37M) with a mean age of 58.2±9.6 were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 69.7 months (range 24 to 177). Mechanical complications occurred in 52.2% of the patients. Mechanical complication rates in proportioned (GAP-P), moderately (GAP-MD) and severely disproportioned (GAP-SD) patients were 21.8%, 55.1%, and 70.4%, respectively. AUC for the GAP score, at 2 years, was 0.682 (95% CI, 0.624 to 0.741, p<.001). AUC at minimum 5 years follow-up was similar at 0.708, while AUC at minimum 7- and 12-year follow-up were 78.5 and 90.7, respectively. Having a postoperative spinopelvic alignment of GAP-MD and GAP-SD resulted in 2.5 and 3.2 folds of relative risk in incurring a mechanical complication when compared to having a proportioned spinopelvic state, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports an association between the GAP Score and mechanical complications in an independent database. Increased association was noted as the years of follow-up increased. Aiming to achieve proportionate GAP Score postoperatively seems to be a viable option as lower GAP scores were associated with lower rates of mechanical complications, and vice versa.

Partial Intraoperative Global Alignment and Proportion Scores Do Not Reliably Predict Postoperative Mechanical Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiographic review.

OBJECTIVES

The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score allows sagittal plane analysis for deformity patients and may be predictive of mechanical complications. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of predicting mechanical failure based on partial intraoperative GAP (iGAP) scores.

METHODS

A retrospective radiographic review was performed on 48 deformity patients between July 2015 to January 2017 with a 2-year follow-up. Using the same methodology as the original GAP study, the partial iGAP score was calculated with the sum of the scores for age, relative lumbar lordosis (RLL), and lordosis distribution index (LDI). Therefore, the iGAP score (0-7) was grouped into proportional (0-2), mildly disproportionate (3-5), and severely disproportionate (6-7). Logistic regression was performed to assess the ability of the partial iGAP score to predict postoperative mechanical failure.

RESULTS

The mean iGAP for patients with a mechanical failure was 3.54, whereas the iGAP for those without a mechanical failure was 3.46 (P = .90). The overall mechanical failure rate was 27.1%. The mechanical failures included 8 proximal junctional kyphosis, 7 rod fractures, and 1 rod slippage from the distal end of the construct. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the partial iGAP score was not able to predict postoperative mechanical failure (χ2 = 1.4; P = .49).

CONCLUSION

The iGAP scores for RLL or LDI did not show any significant correlation to postoperative mechanical failure. Ultimately, the proposed partial iGAP score did not predict postoperative mechanical failure and thus, cannot be used as an intraoperative alignment assessment to avoid postoperative mechanical complications.

State of the art: proximal junctional kyphosis-diagnosis, management and prevention

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a common problem that may occur following the surgical treatment of adult patients with spinal deformity. It is defined as the proximal junctional sagittal angle from the UIV and UVI + 2 of at least 10° AND at least 10° greater than the preop measurement. The reported incidence of radiographic PJK in the literature varies between 17 and 46%. A smaller subset of these patients may need revision surgery and are defined as proximal junctional failure (PJF), which can be associated with vertebral fracture, vertebral subluxation, failure of instrumentation, and neurological deficits. Several risk factors for development of PJK have been proposed. However, large-scale prospective studies are needed to better identify strategies to reduce the incidence of PJK.

Reducing revision rates following Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy surgery: a single-center experience of trends over 7 years in patients with Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

This is a single-center, retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess if implemented changes to clinical practice have reduced mechanical complications following pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) surgery. Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is increasing in prevalence with concurrent increasing demands for surgical treatment. The most extensive technique, PSO, allows for major correction of rigid deformities. However, surgery-related complications have been reported in rates up to 77% and especially mechanical complications occur at unsatisfactory frequencies.

METHODS

We retrospectively included all patients undergoing PSO for ASD between 2010 and 2016. Changes to clinical practice were introduced continuously in the study period, including rigorous patient selection; inter-disciplinary conferences; implant-material; number of surgeons; surgeon experience; and perioperative standardized protocols for pain, neuromonitoring and blood-loss management. Postoperative complications were recorded in the 2-year follow-up period. Competing risk survival analysis was used to assess cumulative incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical complications. The Mann-Kendall test was used for analysis of trends.

RESULTS

We included 185 patients undergoing PSO. The level of PSO changed over the study period (P < 0.01) with L3 being the most common level in 2010 compared to L4 in 2016. Both preoperative and surgical corrections of sagittal vertical axis were larger towards the end of the study period. The 2-year revision rate due to mechanical failure steadily declined over the study period from 52% in 2010 to 14% for patients treated in 2016, although without statistically significant trend (P = 0.072). In addition, rates of mechanical complications steadily declined over the study period and significant decreasing trends were observed in time trend analyses of overall complications, major complications and rod breakage.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed decreased risks of revision surgery due to mechanical complications following PSO in patients with ASD over a 7-year period. We attribute these improvements to advancements in patient selection, surgical planning and techniques, surgeon experience and more standardized perioperative care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Optimal Reconstruction of Sagittal Alignment According to Global Alignment And Proportion Score Can Reduce Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Lumbar Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score to predict the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The recently developed GAP score was applied to predict postoperative complications for adult spinal deformity, as well as to facilitate future outcome-based research on optimal treatment for various spinal conditions. However, it remains unclear whether reconstruction of alignment according to GAP score can reduce the ASD rates.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed 126 consecutive patients who had undergone lumbar fusion and had been followed over 2 years. Pre- and postoperative radiographs and MRI were analyzed for ASD. GAP scores were calculated based on the early postoperative spinopelvic parameters. Cochran-Armitage test of trend was performed to investigate the association between GAP score and the occurrence of ASD. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the predictive accuracy of the GAP score for ASD.

RESULTS

Radiographical ASD (R-ASD) and symptomatic ASD (S-ASD) were diagnosed in 44 (34.9%) patients and in 13 (10.3%) patients, respectively. The patients with a proportioned spinopelvic state according to the GAP score had significantly lower rates of ASD (R-ASD and S-ASD) or S-ASD than those with a moderately or severely disproportioned spinopelvic state. The area under curve for the GAP score predicting ASD and S-ASD was 0.691 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.596∼0.785, P < 0.01) and 0.865 (95% CI: 0.771∼0.958, P < 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed a significant association between postoperative GAP score and occurrence of ASD after lumbar fusion surgery. Setting surgical goals according to the GAP score may help reduce the occurrence of ASD, especially for S-ASD.Level of Evidence: 4.

Validity of the global alignment proportion (GAP) score in predicting mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery in elderly patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to validate the usefulness of the global alignment proportion (GAP) score to predict postoperative mechanical failure in the elderly (mean age, 70.5 years) individuals with severe sagittal imbalance.

METHODS

A total of 84 patients were enrolled: mechanical complications (MC), minor mechanical complications (mMC), proximal junctional failure (PJF), and revision surgery occurred in 61% (51/84), 58% (49/84), 44% (37/84), and 13% (11/84) of the patients, respectively. The GAP score was calculated using the X-ray obtained in the early postoperative period. The validity of the GAP score's predictive ability was evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics curve. Univariate logistic regression analysis and Cochran-Armitage test of trend were performed to determine the association between mechanical complications and GAP score.

RESULTS

The discriminatory power of GAP score to predict MC, mMC, and PJF was "moderately accurate," with an AUC of 0.839 (confidence interval [CI] 0.755-0.824, p < 0.001), 0.836 (CI 0.749-0.923, p < 0.001), and 0.702 (CI 0.588-0.851, p < 0.001), respectively. The GAP score showed a statistically significant association with MC, mMC, and PJF in univariate logistic regression analysis and Cochran-Armitage test for trend. However, it was not significantly associated with revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study showed promising results regarding the GAP score's predictive power for MC, mMC, and PJF in the elderly population with degenerative kyphoscoliosis. Using the GAP score, we can determine the patient's specific correction goal preoperatively to prevent mechanical failure based on individual patient's characteristics such as pelvic incidence.

Are Higher Global Alignment and Proportion Scores Associated With Increased Risks of Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery? An External Validation

BACKGROUND

The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score, based on pelvic incidence-based proportional parameters, was recently developed to predict mechanical complications after surgery for spinal deformities in adults. However, this score has not been validated in an independent external dataset.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

After adult spinal deformity surgery, is a higher GAP score associated with (1) an increased risk of mechanical complications, defined as rod fractures, implant-related complications, proximal or distal junctional kyphosis or failure; (2) a higher likelihood of undergoing revision surgery to treat a mechanical complication; and (3) is a lower (more proportioned) GAP score category associated with better validated outcomes scores using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) and the Short Form-36 questionnaires?

METHODS

A total of 272 patients who had undergone corrective surgeries for complex spinal deformities were enrolled in the Scoli-RISK-1 prospective trial. Patients were included in this secondary analysis if they fulfilled the original inclusion criteria by Yilgor et al. From the original 272 patients, 14% (39) did not satisfy the radiographic inclusion criteria, the GAP score could not be calculated in 14% (37), and 24% (64) did not have radiographic assessment at postoperative 2 years, leaving 59% (159) for analysis in this review of data from the original trial. A total of 159 patients were included in this study,with a mean age of 58 ± 14 years at the time of surgery. Most patients were female (72%, 115 of 159), the mean number of levels involved in surgery was 12 ± 4, and three-column osteotomy was performed in 76% (120 of 159) of patients. The GAP score was calculated using parameters from early postoperative radiographs (between 3 and 12 weeks) including pelvic incidence, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, lower arc lordosis and global tilt, which were independently obtained from a computer software based on centralized patient radiographs. The GAP score was categorized as proportional (scores of 0 to 2), moderately disproportional (scores of 3 to 6), or severely disproportional (scores higher than 7 to 13). Receiver operating characteristic area under curve (AUC) was used to assess associations between GAP score and risk of mechanical complications and risk of revision surgery. An AUC of 0.5 to 0.7 was classified as "no or low associative power", 0.7 to 0.9 as "moderate" and greater than 0.9 as "high". We analyzed differences in validated outcome scores between the GAP categories using Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

At a minimum of 2 years' follow-up, a higher GAP score was not associated with increased risks of mechanical complications (AUC = 0.60 [95% CI 0.50 to 0.70]). A higher GAP score was not associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing a revision surgery to treat a mechanical complication (AUC = 0.66 [95% 0.53 to 0.78]). However, a moderately disproportioned GAP score category was associated with better SF-36 physical component summary score (36 ± 10 versus 40 ± 11; p = 0.047), better SF-36 mental component summary score (46 ± 13 versus 51 ± 12; p = 0.01), better SRS-22 total score (3.4 ± 0.8 versus 3.7 ± 0.7, p = 0.02) and better ODI score (35 ± 21 versus 25 ± 20; p = 0.003) than severely disproportioned GAP score category.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of this external validation study, we found that alignment targets based on the GAP score alone were not associated with increased risks of mechanical complications and mechanical revisions in patients with complex adult spinal disorders. Parameters not included in the original GAP score needed to be considered to reduce the likelihood of mechanical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Predictive Probability of the Global Alignment and Proportion Score for the Development of Mechanical Failure Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery in Asian Patients

STUDY DESIGN

This is a multicenter retrospective review of 257 surgically treated consecutive ASD patients who had a minimum of five fused segments, completed a 2-year follow-up (53 ± 19 yrs, females: 236 [92%]).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to validate the predictive probability of the GAP score in an Asian ASD patient cohort.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The GAP score is a recently established risk stratification model for MF following ASD surgery. However, the predictive ability of the GAP score is not well studied. This study aimed to validate the predictive probability of the GAP score in an Asian ASD patient cohort.

METHODS

Comparisons of the immediate postoperative GAP scores between MF the and MF-free groups were performed. We evaluated the discriminative ability of the GAP score based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The Cuzick test was performed to determine whether there is a trend between the GAP score and the incidence of MF or revision surgery. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the associations between the GAP score and the incidence of MF or revision surgery.

RESULTS

No difference was observed in the GAP score between the MF and MF-free groups (MF vs. MF-free; GAP: 5.9 ± 3.3 vs. 5.2 ± 2.7, P = 0.07). The Cuzick analysis showed no trend between the GAP score and the risk for MF or revision surgery. Likewise, the MF rate was not correlated with the GAP score, as shown by the ROC curve (AUC of 0.56 [95% CI 0.48-0.63], P = 0.124). Univariate logistic regression confirmed no associations between the GAP score and the incidence of MF or revision surgery (MF; moderately disproportioned [MD]: OR: 0.6 [95% CI: 0.3-1.2], P = 0.17, severely disproportioned [SD]: OR: 1.2 [95% CI: 0.6-2.3], P = 0.69, revision surgery; MD: OR: 0.8 [95% CI: 0.2-2.8], P = 0.71, SD: OR: 1.2 [95% CI: 0.9-8.7], P = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter study, in an Asian ASD patient cohort, the GAP score was not associated with the incidence of MF or revision surgery. Additional studies on the predictive ability of the GAP score in different patient cohorts are warranted.Level of Evidence: 3.

Does the Global Alignment and Proportion score overestimate mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity correction?

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to validate the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score in a cohort of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. The GAP score is a novel measure that uses sagittal parameters relative to each patient's lumbosacral anatomy to predict mechanical complications after ASD surgery. External validation is required.

METHODS

Adult ASD patients undergoing > 4 levels of posterior fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Six-week postoperative standing radiographs were used to calculate the GAP score, classified into a spinopelvic state as proportioned (P), moderately disproportioned (MD), or severely disproportioned (SD). A chi-square analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve, and Cochran-Armitage analysis were performed to assess the relationship between the GAP score and mechanical complications.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients with a mean age of 52.5 years (range 18-75 years) and a mean follow-up of 2.04 years were included. Patients with < 2 years of follow-up were included only if they had an early mechanical complication. Twenty of 67 patients (29.8%) had a mechanical complication. The spinopelvic state breakdown was as follows: P group, 21/67 (31.3%); MD group, 23/67 (34.3%); and SD group, 23/67 (34.3%). Mechanical complication rates were not significantly different among all groups: P group, 19.0%; MD group, 30.3%; and SD group, 39.1% (χ2 = 1.70, p = 0.19). The rates of mechanical complications between the MD and SD groups (30.4% and 39.1%) were less than those observed in the original GAP study (MD group 36.4%-57.1% and SD group 72.7%-100%). Within the P group, the rates in this study were higher than in the original study (19.0% vs 4.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found no statistically significant difference in the rate of mechanical complications between the P, MD, and SD groups. The current validation study revealed poor generalizability toward the authors' patient population.

Mechanical revision following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a competing risk survival analysis in 171 consecutive adult spinal deformity patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To report the incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. PSO allow major surgical correction of ASD, although; the risk of mechanical complications remains considerable. Previous reports have been based on smaller cohorts or multicenter databases and none have utilized competing risk (CR) survival analysis.

METHODS

All ASD patients undergoing PSO surgery from 2010 to 2015 at a single, tertiary institution were included. Demographics, long standing radiographs as well as intra- and postoperative complications were registered for all. A CR-model was used to estimate the incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure and two predefined multivariable models were used to assess radiographic prediction of failure and reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were included with 2-year follow-up available for 91% (mean [IQR]: 35 [24-50] months). Mechanical failure occurred in 111 cases (65%) at any time in follow-up, the most frequent being rod breakage affecting 81 patients (47%). Cumulative incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure was estimated to 34% at 2 years and 58% at 5 years. A multivariable proportional odds model with death as competing risk showed significantly increased odds of revision with fusion to the sacrum (OR: 5.42; 95% CI 1.89-15.49) and preoperative pelvic tilt (PT) > 20° (OR: 2.41; 95% CI 1.13-5.16). History of previous surgery, number of instrumented vertebra, as well as postoperative SRS-Schwab modifiers and Global Alignment and Proportion score were not associated with significant effects on odds of revision.

CONCLUSIONS

In a consecutive single-center cohort of patients undergoing PSO for ASD, we found an estimated incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure of 34% 2 years postoperatively. Fusion to the sacrum and preoperative PT > 20° were associated with elevated risks of revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic III.

State of the art advances in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) can be associated with substantial suffering due to pain and disability. Surgical intervention for achieving neural decompression and restoring physiological spinal alignment has shown to result in significant improvement in pain and disability through patient-reported outcomes. Traditional open approaches involving posterior osteotomy techniques and instrumentation are effective based on clinical outcomes but associated with high complication rates, even in the hands of the most experienced surgeons. Minimally invasive techniques may offer benefit while decreasing associated morbidity. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for ASD has evolved over the past 20 years, driven by improved understanding of open procedures along with novel technique development and technologic advancements. Early efforts were hindered due to suboptimal outcomes resulting from high pseudarthrosis, inadequate correction, and fixation failure rates. To address this, multi-center collaborative groups have been established to study large numbers of ASD patients which have been vital to understanding optimal patient selection and individualized management strategies. Different MIS decision-making algorithms have been described to better define appropriate candidates and interbody selection approaches in ASD. The purpose of this state of the review is to describe the evolution of MIS surgery for adult deformity with emphasis on landmark papers, and to discuss specific MIS technology for ASD, including percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation, hyperlordotic grafts, three-dimensional navigation, and robotics.

Surgical correction of Adult Spinal Deformity in accordance to the Roussouly classification: effect on postoperative mechanical complications

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the restoration of ideal sagittal spine shape in accordance to the Roussouly classification and the effect on postoperative mechanical complications. Surgical correction of Adult Spinal Deformity is both challenging and complex. The risk of postoperative complications is considerable, especially mechanical complications requiring revision surgery. Attention has been directed toward defining alignment targets in attempts to minimize these risks, and the Roussouly classification has been proposed as a potential surgical aim.

METHODS

All patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2013-2016 were included at a single, quaternary institute. Successful restoration of Roussouly spine shape was retrospectively assessed, and patients were classified as either "restored" or "non-restored". Cumulative incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, with death as the competing risk. A multivariable proportional odds model was used to estimate the effect of the Roussouly algorithm on revision surgery due to mechanical failure.

RESULTS

We identified a complete and consecutive cohort of 233 patients who were followed for a mean period of 36 (± 14) months. The 2-year cumulative incidence of revision surgery was 28%. Comparing the "restored" to the "non-restored" group, the overall revision rates were high in both groups. However, when adjusting for known cofounders in a multivariable proportional odds analysis, there was an almost fivefold increased odds of revision due to mechanical failure in the "non-restored" group (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Surgical correction of ASD in accordance to the ideal Roussouly spine shape was correlated to a marked and significant decrease in risk of revision surgery due to mechanical failure. Nonetheless, the overall revision risk was elevated in both groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Identification of Predictive Factors for Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate correction surgeries that were performed in relatively aged patients in terms of mechanical complications (MCs) and their predictive factors.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The risk factors associated with MCs have not yet been well examined, especially in aged populations.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 230 surgically treated ASD patients with an average age of 72.2 years. Twenty-eight patients with ASD caused by vertebral fractures were excluded. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Postoperative MCs were defined as proximal junction kyphosis, distal junction kyphosis, pseudoarthrosis, rod breakage, and vertebral fractures. We divided all the ASD patients into two groups: patients with MC (the MC (+) group) and patients without MC (the MC (-) group). Radiographic parameters were evaluated before and immediately after surgery. The SRS-Schwab ASD classification and global alignment and proportion (GAP) score were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 202 patients, 91 (45.0%) had MCs. The age at surgery was significantly higher in the MC (+) group than in the MC (-) group. Regarding radiographic parameters, postoperative global tilt (GT), pre- and postoperative thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and postoperative thoracic kyphosis were significantly higher in the MC (+) group than in the MC (-) group. Other parameters, such as the proposed ideal alignment target of PI-LL<10, did not significantly affect MC rates. The GAP score was high in both groups and not significantly related to a higher rate of MC. Forward stepwise logistic regression indicated that the age at surgery, postoperative GT, and preoperative TLK were significant risk factors for MCs.

CONCLUSION

Older age, higher postoperative GT, and higher pre and postoperative TLK can be risk factors for MCs. The GAP score was high in both groups and not significantly related to a higher rate of MC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.