Surgical treatment of Roussouly type 1 with realigning Roussouly spinal shape and improving SRS-Schwab modifier: effect on minimal clinically important difference

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of choosing different Roussouly shapes and improving in Schwab modifiers for surgical Roussouly type 1 patients.

METHODS

Baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) clinical data of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients presenting with Roussouly type 1 sagittal spinal alignment were isolated in the single-center spine database. Patients were grouped into Roussouly type 1, 2 and 3 with anteverted pelvis (3a) postoperatively. Schwab modifiers at BL and 2Y were categorized as follows: no deformity (0), moderate deformity (+), and severe deformity (++) for pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL). Improvement in SRS-Schwab was defined as a decrease in the severity of any modifier at 2Y.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients (69.9 years, 72.9% female, 25.2 kg/m2) were included. At 2Y, there were 34 type 1 backs, 60 type 2 backs and only 2 type 3a. Type 1 and type 2 did not differ in rates of reaching 2Y minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores (all P > 0.05). Two patients who presented with type 3a had poor HRQOL scores. Analysis of Schwab modifiers showed that 41.7% of patients improved in SVA, 45.8% in PI-LL, and 36.5% in PT. At 2Y, patients who improved in SRS-Schwab PT and SVA had lower Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores and significantly more of them reached MCID for ODI (all P < 0.001). Patients who improved in SRS-Schwab SVA and PI-LL had more changes of VAS Back and Short Form-36 (SF-36) outcomes questionnaire physical component summary (SF-36 PCS), and significantly more reached MCID (all P < 0.001). By 2Y, type 2 patients who improved in SRS-Schwab grades reached MCID for VAS back and ODI at the highest rate (P = 0.003, P = 0.001, respectively), and type 1 patients who improved in SRS-Schwab grades reached MCID for SF-36 PCS at the highest rate (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

For ASD patients classified as Roussouly type 1, postoperative improvement in SRS-Schwab grades reflected superior patient-reported outcomes while type 1 and type 2 did not differ in clinical outcomes at 2Y. However, development of type 3a should be avoided at the risk of poor functional outcomes. Utilizing both classification systems in surgical decision-making can optimize postoperative outcomes.

Predictive role of global spinopelvic alignment and upper instrumented vertebra level in symptomatic proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity

OBJECTIVE

The authors of this study sought to evaluate the predictive role of global sagittal alignment and upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) level in symptomatic proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) among patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

Data on ASD patients who had undergone fusion of ≥ 5 vertebrae from 2008 to 2018 and with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were obtained from a prospectively collected multicenter database and evaluated (n = 1312). Radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years postoperatively. The 22-Item Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire Revised (SRS-22r) scores were collected preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively. Symptomatic PJK was defined as a kyphotic increase > 20° in the Cobb angle from the UIV to the UIV+2. At 6 weeks postoperatively, sagittal parameters were evaluated and patients were categorized by global alignment and proportion (GAP) score/category and SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers. Patients were stratified by UIV level: upper thoracic (UT) UIV ≥ T8 or lower thoracic (LT) UIV ≤ T9.

RESULTS

Patients who developed symptomatic PJK (n = 260) had worse 1-year postoperative SRS-22r mental health (3.70 vs 3.86) and total (3.56 vs 3.67) scores, as well as worse 2-year postoperative self-image (3.45 vs 3.65) and satisfaction (4.03 vs 4.22) scores (all p ≤ 0.04). In the whole study cohort, patients with PJK had less pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch (-0.24° vs 3.29°, p < 0.001) but no difference in their GAP score/category or SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers compared with the patients without PJK. Regression showed a higher risk of PJK with a pelvic tilt (PT) grade ++ (OR 2.35) and less risk with a PI-LL grade ++ (OR 0.35; both p < 0.01). When specifically analyzing the LT UIV cohort, patients with PJK had a higher GAP score (5.66 vs 4.79), greater PT (23.02° vs 20.90°), and less PI-LL mismatch (1.61° vs 4.45°; all p ≤ 0.02). PJK patients were less likely to be proportioned postoperatively (17.6% vs 30.0%, p = 0.015), and regression demonstrated a greater PJK risk with severe disproportion (OR 1.98) and a PT grade ++ (OR 3.15) but less risk with a PI-LL grade ++ (OR 0.45; all p ≤ 0.01). When specifically evaluating the UT UIV cohort, the PJK patients had less PI-LL mismatch (-2.11° vs 1.45°) but no difference in their GAP score/category. Regression showed a greater PJK risk with a PT grade + (OR 1.58) and a decreased risk with a PI-LL grade ++ (OR 0.21; both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic PJK leads to worse patient-reported outcomes and is associated with less postoperative PI-LL mismatch and greater postoperative PT. A worse postoperative GAP score and disproportion are only predictive of symptomatic PJK in patients with an LT UIV.

Use of the Global Alignment and Proportion score to predict postoperative health-related quality of life in adult spinal deformity surgery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to validate the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score as a predictor of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes for patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with ASD undergoing long-segment spine fusions (≥ 5 vertebrae fused) at a single institution over a 2-year period (n = 85). Radiographic parameters were measured at preoperative, 6-week postoperative, 1-year postoperative, and 2-year postoperative visits. GAP scores were calculated using 4 sagittal parameters: relative pelvic version, relative lumbar lordosis, lordosis distribution index, and relative spinopelvic alignment. Patients were stratified into 3 GAP categories at each time point: proportioned (score 0-2), moderately disproportioned (score 3-6), and severely disproportioned (score ≥ 7). HRQOL outcomes were collected at preoperative, 1-year postoperative, and 2-year postoperative visits; these measures included patient self-reported outcome measures (i.e., PROMIS), Scoliosis Research Society-22 spinal deformity questionnaire (SRS-22), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores.

RESULTS

Overall, 42% of cases were revision surgeries and 96.5% of patients underwent fusion to the sacrum. The mean preoperative GAP score significantly improved from preoperative (7.84) to immediate postoperative (3.31) assessment (p < 0.001). Similarly, the percentage of patients categorized as proportioned improved from 9.4% at preoperative to 45.9% at immediate postoperative evaluation. The preoperative GAP score or category was not significantly associated with any preoperative HRQOL outcome metrics. The immediate postoperative GAP score was not correlated with any 1-year HRQOL outcomes. However, the immediate postoperative GAP score was significantly associated with 2-year SRS-22 outcomes, including SRS-22 function (r = -0.35, p < 0.01), self-image (r = -0.27, p = 0.044), and subtotal (r = -0.35, p < 0.01) scores. As compared to severely disproportioned patients, proportioned patients had better SRS-22 pain (4.08 vs 3.17, p = 0.04), satisfaction (4.40 vs 3.50, p = 0.02), and subtotal (4.01 vs 3.27, p = 0.036) scores. The immediate postoperative GAP score was also significantly associated with 2-year PROMIS outcomes, including PROMIS pain (r = 0.31, p = 0.023) and physical function (r = -0.35, p < 0.01) scores. As compared to severely disproportioned patients, proportioned patients had better PROMIS pain (53.18 vs 63.60, p = 0.025) and physical function (41.66 vs 34.18, p = 0.017) scores. Postoperative GAP score or category did not predict any ODI outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative GAP score is a predictor of long-term HRQOL outcomes following ASD surgery, and proportioned patients are more likely to have less pain and be satisfied with their surgery. However, the postoperative GAP score does not predict outcomes as measured by ODI.

Mechanical revision following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a competing risk survival analysis in 171 consecutive adult spinal deformity patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To report the incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. PSO allow major surgical correction of ASD, although; the risk of mechanical complications remains considerable. Previous reports have been based on smaller cohorts or multicenter databases and none have utilized competing risk (CR) survival analysis.

METHODS

All ASD patients undergoing PSO surgery from 2010 to 2015 at a single, tertiary institution were included. Demographics, long standing radiographs as well as intra- and postoperative complications were registered for all. A CR-model was used to estimate the incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure and two predefined multivariable models were used to assess radiographic prediction of failure and reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were included with 2-year follow-up available for 91% (mean [IQR]: 35 [24-50] months). Mechanical failure occurred in 111 cases (65%) at any time in follow-up, the most frequent being rod breakage affecting 81 patients (47%). Cumulative incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure was estimated to 34% at 2 years and 58% at 5 years. A multivariable proportional odds model with death as competing risk showed significantly increased odds of revision with fusion to the sacrum (OR: 5.42; 95% CI 1.89-15.49) and preoperative pelvic tilt (PT) > 20° (OR: 2.41; 95% CI 1.13-5.16). History of previous surgery, number of instrumented vertebra, as well as postoperative SRS-Schwab modifiers and Global Alignment and Proportion score were not associated with significant effects on odds of revision.

CONCLUSIONS

In a consecutive single-center cohort of patients undergoing PSO for ASD, we found an estimated incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure of 34% 2 years postoperatively. Fusion to the sacrum and preoperative PT > 20° were associated with elevated risks of revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic III.

SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy for congenital thoracolumbar kyphosis: a minimum of 2 years follow-up study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Several osteotomy techniques including pedicle subtraction osteotomy and vertebral column resection have been employed in the correction of congenital kyphosis (CK) and satisfying outcomes have been demonstrated. However, the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy, defined as resection of posterior elements, partial vertebral body, and superior adjacent disc, is rarely reported in the treatment of CK.

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy in patients with CK, and to propose its optimal indication.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with CK undergoing SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy.

PATIENTS SAMPLE

Patients with thoracolumbar CK undergoing SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy from January 2010 to May 2015 followed up for at least 2 years were retrospectively reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, segmental kyphosis (SK), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope were measured on lateral spinal x-rays. Patients were required to fulfill the SRS-22 questionnaire at preoperation and the last follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sagittal spinal-pelvic parameters were assessed at preoperation, postoperation, and last follow-up. The comparison between preoperation and postoperation was performed by paired samples t test.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients with CK (17 male and 21 female) with an average age of 16.5±9.9 years were included. The mean operating time was 242.7±88.1 minutes and blood loss was 634.5±177.8 mL. The mean follow-up was 38.8±20.3 months. The SK was 49.5±11.7° at preoperation, 6.8±7.4° at postoperation (p<.001), and 8.0±8.1° at the last follow-up. No significant correction loss during follow-up was found in SK (p=.125). The SVA was improved from -36.0±18.3 mm at preoperation to 3.7±17.8 mm at postoperation (p<.001), and the correction was well maintained during follow-up (p=.113). Compared with preoperation, the mean postoperative scores of each domains of SRS-22 questionnaire improved at different levels. Intraoperative complications included one case with incidental dural tear and another with transient root injury. Proximal junctional kyphosis occurred in three patients at 6 months after operation and remained stable during the follow-up. At the last follow-up, all patients were identified to have achieved solid bony fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy, if selected appropriately, could provide satisfying correction of congenital kyphosis. The correction could be well maintained during the longitudinal follow-up.

Inter- and Intra-rater Agreement in Assessment of Adult Spinal Deformity Using the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab Classification

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional assessment of inter- and intra-rater agreement.

OBJECTIVES

To assess inter- and intra-rater agreement between spine surgeons with different levels of experience in a large consecutive series of adult patients referred to a tertiary institution for evaluation of a spinal deformity using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification.

BACKGROUND

The development of the SRS-Schwab classification of adult spinal deformity is based on current knowledge about relevant radiographic variables related to health-related quality of life. Clinical implementation of the classification requires satisfactory reliability. Two recent reports on agreement were based on a small selected case sample using pre-marked radiographs and a large cohort of only surgical patients, including congenital deformity.

METHODS

Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification of 67 consecutive adult patients referred for surgical evaluation of a spinal deformity was done in a blinded fashion without pre-marking by 2 senior spine surgeons, 1 attending, and 1 spine fellow. After 2 weeks, the classification was repeated on recoded radiographs. Inter- and intra-rater agreement was analyzed using Fleiss kappa statistics. Rater bias was assessed using Bhapkar test for marginal homogeneity.

RESULTS

According to Landis and Koch, the observed agreements were considered substantial to almost perfect for curve type and sagittal modifiers and moderate for entire grade, with no consistent differences between surgeons with different levels of experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The results for each individual radiographic parameter correspond to previous findings and support use of the SRS-Schwab classification in adult spinal deformity. The results for entire grade were considered only moderate. The authors recommend that it is not used as an individual parameter.