Aspirin Use among Saudi Adults: The Prevalence and Users’ Characteristics

Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in Saudi Arabia: Evaluating Maternal and Neonatal Risks, Outcomes, and Aspirin Prophylaxis: A Review Article

Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, including pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, pose significant risks to both maternal and neonatal health. This review article evaluates the prevalence, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and the efficacy of aspirin prophylaxis in managing these conditions in Saudi Arabia. Utilizing data from multiple retrospective studies and recent guidelines, we highlight the regional variations in the outcomes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Severe complications such as Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets (HELLP) syndrome occurred in 6.6% of cases, while eclampsia was reported in 6.7% of cases. Cesarean sections were notably high, with rates reaching up to 79% among affected pregnancies. Maternal risk factors identified include chronic hypertension (prevalence 17%), diabetes (ranging from 10.4% to 26.3%), and advanced maternal age. Neonatal complications often involve preterm birth, reported in 26.5% to 26.7% of cases, intrauterine growth restriction (ranging from 15.7% to 25%), and increased NICU admissions, reported in 2.4% of cases. No data were found in the included studies to evaluate the prophylactic use of low-dose aspirin in reducing the incidence of pre-eclampsia or improving fetomaternal outcomes. Despite the effectiveness of aspirin, awareness and implementation of prophylaxis guidelines remain suboptimal among healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia. A national survey revealed that only a fraction of obstetrical care providers were fully knowledgeable about aspirin prophylaxis guidelines. This review underscores the necessity for enhanced educational programs and standardized guidelines to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes in hypertensive pregnancies within the region.

The current view of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among older adults in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review

Introduction: Potentially inappropriate medications PIMs are common among elderly population and becoming a global health issue. It has been associated with negative health consequences like preventable adverse drug reactions, hospitalization and mortality. Objectives: To investigate the most commonly potentially inappropriate medications in older adults in Saudi Arabia. Additionally, we aim to gain insights into the typical healthcare settings where healthcare providers offer services related to PIMs. Methods: This is a systematic review design using Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. PubMed and Google Scholar were used to search for the relevant studies using the following keywords (older adults, elderly, potentially inappropriate medications, inappropriate medications, PMIs, Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) with no restrictions to the date of publications nor the study language. Results: Only 8 studies have met our inclusion and exclusion criteria, which was most of them were cross-sectional study design (n = 6.75%) and all of them have been conducted in hospital-based settings. In addition, the prevalence of PIMs ranged from 19% to 80% depends on the site and administration of the study. We have found that proton pump inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, diuretics, gastrointestinal medications, and antidepressants were the most common reported PIMs in the included studies. Conclusion: The prevalence of PIMs among the elderly in Saudi Arabia is notably high ranged from 19% to 80%, underscoring the need for additional research to assess the existing practices within this vulnerable demographic across various healthcare settings.