Sentinel lymph node mapping for 385 gastric cancer patients

Usefulness of shear-wave elastography for detection of lymph node metastasis in esophageal and gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Tissue hardness is closely related to disease pathophysiology. Shear-wave elastography (SWE) is a simple and noninvasive ultrasound technique that has been used to evaluate the presence of lymph node metastases and differentiate between benign and malignant tumors.

AIM

To investigate SWE usefulness in measuring lymph node hardness to predict metastasis presence or absence in surgically removed lymph nodes.

METHODS

This observational study obtained data from patients who underwent surgery for esophageal or gastric cancer at Nippon Medical School Hospital. The hardness of the surgically removed lymph nodes was measured using SWE. The lymph nodes with hardness values ≥ 2.2 m/s were considered clinically positive for metastasis, whereas those with lower hardness values were considered clinically negative. The lymph nodes subsequently underwent pathological examination to determine the presence of metastasis, and the SWE results and pathological assessments were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1077 lymph nodes were evaluated; 18 and 15 cases of esophageal and gastric cancer were identified, respectively. The optimal cutoff value for lymph node size was calculated to be 5.1 mm, and the area under the curve value was 0.74 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.84). When limited to a lymph node larger than the cut off value, the SWE sensitivity and specificity for metastasis identification were 0.76 and 0.82, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SWE was useful in detecting lymph node metastases in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Total versus proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze and compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of proximal gastrectomy (PG) and total gastrectomy (TG) in patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (GC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHOD

A multicenter retrospective cohort study and propensity score matching (PSM) were employed. The authors examined 367 patients with proximal GC who received NACT followed by PG ( n =164) or TG ( n =203) at two Chinese medical institutions between December 2009 and December 2022. Clinical and pathological parameters, postoperative complications, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups. The dissection status and metastasis rate of each lymph node station were assessed.

RESULTS

After PSM, 80 patients were enrolled in both TG and PG group, and baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups (all P >0.05). The TG group had a higher total number of lymph nodes retrieved ( P <0.001) and longer operative time ( P =0.007) compared to the PG group. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher postoperative complications was similar between the TG group (21.3%, 17/80) and the PG group (17.5%, 14/80) ( P =0.689). The 5-year OS rates were 68.4 for the PG group and 66.0% for the TG group ( P =0.881), while the 5-year RFS rates were 64.8 and 61.9%, respectively ( P =0.571), with no statistically significant differences. Metastasis rates at lymph node stations #4d, #5, #6, and #12a were notably low in the TG group, with values of 2.74, 0.67, 1.33, and 1.74%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For proximal GC patients following NACT, PG maintains comparable curative potential and oncological efficacy to TG, making it a safe option.

Recent Advances in Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer

Maintaining the postoperative quality of life (QOL) while ensuring curability without overtreatment is important in the treatment of early gastric cancer. Postoperative QOL is anticipated to be maintained through minimally invasive function-preserving gastrectomy in early gastric cancer. The concept of the sentinel lymph node (SN) basin is essential to maintain the curability of early gastric cancer using minimally invasive function-preserving gastrectomy. However, additional resection after surgery is difficult to perform in gastric cancer. Thus, the SN basin theory is important. Recently, a multicenter randomized phase III trial in South Korea (SENORITA trial) proved that laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) for stomach preservation results in better postoperative QOL compared with standard gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer. LSNNS contributes to patients' QOL based on the concept that curability is not impaired. A multicenter nonrandomized phase III trial is ongoing in Japan, and oncologic safety is expected to be demonstrated. LSNNS has been established as a treatment option for selected patients with early gastric cancer, and its application will become widespread in the future.

Indications and technical aspects of proximal gastrectomy

According to the World Health Organization, gastric cancer is the fifth most common type of tumor, and is the third most common cause of tumor-associated death. Although gastric cancer incidence rates have decreased in the past few decades, the prevalence of proximal gastric cancer has been steadily rising in developed countries. Techniques regarding the improvement of treatment options must thus be developed. This can be achieved through incorporating both a wider use of endoscopic surgery (endoscopic mucosal resection-EMR, endoscopic submucosal dissection-ESD) and a review of applied surgical interventions. Even though there is no single international consensus available, the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) recommends proximal gastrectomy with D1+ lymphadenectomy in early gastric tumors. Despite recommendations from Asian guidelines and the short term outcomes of the KLASS 05 trial, surgical treatments in Western countries still rely on total gastrectomy. This is mostly due to technical and oncological challenges regarding surgical interventions in a proximal gastrectomy. However, the residual stomach after a proximal gastrectomy has been shown to diminish the incidence of dumping syndrome and anemia, and even improve postoperative quality of life (QoL). Therefore, it is necessary to define the place of proximal gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancers.

Tracers in Gastric Cancer Surgery

The treatment of gastric cancer mainly depends on radical gastrectomy. Determination of appropriate surgical margins and adequate lymph node (LN) resection are two major surgical steps that directly correlate with prognosis in gastric cancer. Due to the expanding use of minimally invasive procedures, it is no longer possible to locate tumors and LNs through touch. As an alternative, tracers have begun to enter the field due to their capacities for intraoperative visualization. Herein, we summarize the application of contemporary tracers in gastric cancer surgery, including isosulfan blue, methylene blue, patent blue, indocyanine green, carbon particles, and radioactive tracers. Their mechanisms, administration methods, detection efficiency, and challenges, as well as perspectives on them, are also outlined.

The Results of Sentinel Node Mapping for Patients with Clinically Early Staged Gastric Cancer Diagnosed with pT2/deeper Tumors

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node (SN) mapping based on the SN concept has been applied to early gastric cancer. However, it is still controversial whether or not the oncological safety is ensured in case pathological stage was advanced in these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of SN mapping in patients with clinically early staged gastric cancer diagnosed with pT2/deeper tumors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients with a diagnosis of cT1N0 or cT2N0 single-lesion gastric cancer who were shown to have pT2 or deeper tumors after gastrectomy with SN mapping. We adopted a dual-tracer method using a radioactive colloid and blue dye to detect SNs. The diagnostic accuracy and distribution of SNs at each tumor site were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 40 patients, 24 (60%) were postoperatively diagnosed as pT2, and 16 (40%) as pT3 or T4. SNs were detected in all patients. The false negative rate was 9% (1/11), and in that patient, the non-SN metastasis was observed within the SN basin. Diagnostic accuracy was 98% (39/40). Overall distribution of SNs was similar to that for patients with early gastric cancer. No significant differences in overall and recurrence-free survival were observed between the patients who underwent standard gastrectomy and those who underwent function-preserving gastrectomy, based on the results of SN mapping.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirmed validity of SN mapping for patients with clinically early staged gastric cancer diagnosed with pT2/deeper tumors after gastrectomy. Closed surveillance without additional surgical treatment is an option for these patients.

Integrating No.3 lymph nodes and primary tumor radiomics to predict lymph node metastasis in T1-2 gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to develope and validate a radiomics nomogram by integrating the quantitative radiomics characteristics of No.3 lymph nodes (LNs) and primary tumors to better predict preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) in T1-2 gastric cancer (GC) patients.

METHODS

A total of 159 T1-2 GC patients who had undergone surgery with lymphadenectomy between March 2012 and November 2017 were retrospectively collected and divided into a training cohort (n = 80) and a testing cohort (n = 79). Radiomic features were extracted from both tumor region and No. 3 station LNs based on computed tomography (CT) images per patient. Then, key features were selected using minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm and fed into two radiomic signatures, respectively. Meanwhile, the predictive performance of clinical risk factors was studied. Finally, a nomogram was built by merging radiomic signatures and clinical risk factors and evaluated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) as well as decision curve.

RESULTS

Two radiomic signatures, reflecting phenotypes of the tumor and LNs respectively, were significantly associated with LN metastasis. A nomogram incorporating two radiomic signatures and CT-reported LN metastasis status showed good discrimination of LN metastasis in both the training cohort (AUC 0.915; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.832-0.998) and testing cohort (AUC 0.908; 95% CI 0.814-1.000). The decision curve also indicated its potential clinical usefulness.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram received favorable predictive accuracy in predicting No.3 LNM in T1-2 GC, and the nomogram showed positive role in predicting LNM in No.4 LNs. The nomogram may be used to predict LNM in T1-2 GC and could assist the choice of therapy.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Gastric Cancer, an Optimization of Imaging Protocol for Tracer Mapping

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) plays an essential role in the evaluation of lymph node (LN) metastasis status and the extent of LN dissection in gastric cancer. The aim of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis for corresponding identification rate and sensitivity of different SLNB techniques.

METHODS

Systematic search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases was conducted for studies on SLNB in patients with gastric cancer. Studies were stratified according to the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy technique: blue dye (BD), radiocolloid tracer (RI), indocyanine green (ICG), a combination of radiocolloid with blue dye (RI + BD), and a combination of radiocolloid with ICG (RI + ICG). A random-effect model was used to pool the identification rate, sensitivity, and accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 54 eligible studies (3767 patients) was included. The pooled identification rates of SLNB using BD, RI, ICG, RI + BD, RI + ICG were 95% (95%CI: 92-97%), 95% (95%CI: 93-97%), 99% (95%CI: 97-99%), 97% (95%CI: 96-98%), and 95% (95%CI: 87-99%), respectively. The pooled sensitivities were 82% (95%CI: 77-86%), 87% (95%CI: 81-92%), 90% (95%CI: 82-95%), 89% (95%CI: 84-93%), and 88% (95%CI: 79-94%), respectively. The pooled accuracies were 94% (95%CI: 91-96%), 95% (95%CI: 92-97%), 98% (95%CI: 95-99%), 97% (95%CI: 95-99%), and 98% (95%CI: 95-99%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current meta-analysis provides reliable evidence that favors the use of ICG and dual tracer method (RI + BD/ICG) for the identification of the SLN. Considering the high costs and potential biohazard of using radioactive substances in dual tracer method, performing SLNB with ICG is the technique of choice for experienced surgeons.

Current status and challenges in sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer

As an optimal surgical procedure to accurately evaluate lymph node (LN) metastasis during surgery with minimal surgical resection, we have been developing sentinel node (SN) biopsy for early gastric cancer since the 1990s. Twelve institutions from the Japanese Society of Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery (SNNS), including Keio University Hospital, conducted a multicenter prospective trial to validate the SN concept using the dual-tracer method with blue dye and a radioisotope. According to the results, 397 patients were included in the final analysis, and the overall accuracy in detecting LN metastasis using SN biopsy was 99% (383 of 387). Based on the validation study, we are targeting cT1N0 with a primary tumor of ≤4 cm in diameter as an indication for SN biopsy for gastric cancer. We are currently running a multicenter nonrandomized phase III trial to assess the safety and efficacy of SN navigation surgery. The Korean group has reported the result of a multicenter randomized phase III trial. Since meticulous gastric cancer in the remnant stomach was rescued by subsequent gastrectomy, the disease-specific survival was comparable between the two techniques, implying that SN navigation surgery can be an alternative to standard gastrectomy. With the development of SN biopsy procedure and treatment modalities, the application of SN biopsy will be expanded to achieve an individualized minimally invasive surgery.

Lymph Node Mapping in Gastric Cancer Surgery: Current Status and New Horizons

Gastric cancer (GC) remains one of the most important malignant diseases with significant geographical, ethnic, and socioeconomic differences in distribution. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping is an accepted way to assess lymphatic spread in several solid tumors; however, the complexity of gastric lymphatic drainage may discourage use of this procedure, and the estimated accuracy rate is, in general, reasonably good. This study aimed at reviewing the current status of SLN mapping and navigation surgery in GC. SLN mapping should be limited to tumors clinically T1 and less than 4 cm in diameter. Combination SLN mapping with radioactive colloid and blue dye is used as the standard. Despite its notable limitations, SLN mapping and SLN navigation surgery present a novelty individualizing the extent of lymphadenectomy.

Assessment of lymphatic flow based on the sentinel node concept in early gastric adenocarcinoma that satisfies expanded endoscopic resection criteria

BACKGROUND

Even though indications for endoscopic resection (ER) in early gastric cancer are determined based on the potential risk of lymph node metastasis, the criteria for ER remain controversial. Sentinel node (SN) mapping for early gastric cancer can help determine regional lymphatic flow patterns. The aim of this study was to assess lymphatic flow according to the SN concept in patients with early gastric cancer, especially those who satisfy the expanded criteria for ER.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 301 patients diagnosed with pT1 adenocarcinoma who had undergone gastrectomy with SN mapping and had no lymphovascular invasion. Patients were categorized into six groups based on oncological assessment. We analyzed lymphatic flow, including the number of identified SN and SN basin, and the rate of SN metastasis in each group.

RESULTS

Of the 301 patients, 128 (42.5%) met the criteria for ER, with 18 in the absolute group and 110 in the expanded group; 173 (57.5%) were assigned to the surgical group. SN metastasis rate tended to be higher in surgical group patients than in ER criteria patients. In the expanded criteria group, the sub-group of patients with intramucosal, undifferentiated adenocarcinoma measuring 20 mm or less had a significantly greater number of identified SNs (p = 0.013) and SN basins (p = 0.032). Furthermore, SN metastasis was observed only in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with intramucosal, nonulcerated, undifferentiated adenocarcinoma measuring 20 mm or less could develop a lymphatic network. For these patients, careful follow-up is required after ER.

[Does sentinel lymph node identification has indication in digestive cancers?]

Despite being a standard of care in several cancers, sentinel lymph node (SLN) is not widespread in digestive cancers. European guidelines do not recommend its use for any digestive cancers. Particularity of the lymphatic vessel, intimately linked to blood vessel, may explain part of this phenomenon. Nevertheless, more indication could arise in the near future with the early diagnosis of tumor induced by cancer screening. Ruling out the lymphatic invasion could allow preserving the organ currently resected because of risk of lymph node positivity. This procedure is well studied in early gastric cancer in Korea and Japan. Several study have demonstrated that, a dual-tracer (isotopic and dye) allows to accurately identify the SLN. A randomized phase 3 trial is currently active in Korea to evaluate the oncological results of the procedure. Similar indication could arise for T1 tumor of the low-rectum, but currently available data are insufficient to recommend its use outside of a study. SLN may also be used to detect aberrant lymphatic drainage (rectum, ileum) but have been tested so far only in a few dozen of patients. Finally, SLN is disappointing in colon cancer, due to its low sensitivity and the absence of modification of the surgical procedure induced.

Oncological safety of proximal gastrectomy for T2/T3 proximal gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether total gastrectomy is necessary for patients with proximal T2/T3 gastric cancer. To explore the oncological safety of proximal gastrectomy for proximal T2/T3 gastric cancer, in this study, we evaluated the metastatic rates in and the therapeutic effect of dissection of key distal lymph node stations that are usually excluded in proximal gastrectomy.

METHODS

In this study, we examined 202 patients seen between January 2000 and December 2012, who underwent total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection (D1/D1+/D2; 2/17/183) and was pathologically diagnosed as T2/T3 gastric cancer exclusively located in the upper third of the stomach. The theoretical therapeutic necessity of dissecting lymph nodes at each lymph node station was evaluated based on the therapeutic index calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis at each station and the 5-year survival rate of patients with metastasis to that station.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rate (95% confidence interval) was 72.9% (65.5-80.3). The metastatic rates at #4d and #12a were very low (0.99% and 0.006%, respectively), and those at #5 and #6 were zero, and therapeutic indices for #4d, #5, #6 and #12a were zero. On the other hand, the most frequent metastatic station was #3, followed by #1, #2 and #7 (overall metastatic rate > 12%), which was consistent with the order of the therapeutic indices.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the nodal stations that need to be dissected, proximal gastrectomy would be the choice and oncologically safe for patients with T2/T3 proximal gastric cancer.

Survival outcomes after sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer

AIM

This study evaluated the prognosis after sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) for early gastric cancer.

METHODS

For 100 patients who underwent SNNS (between August 13, 2003 and December 17, 2018) at our hospital, the survival outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

(a) SN were detected with a diagnostic accuracy of 0.98. (b) Of seven patients who had positive SN metastasis, three underwent standard gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Among them, one patient died of recurrence (bone) and the other two patients were alive 4.5 and 14.7 years after surgery. The remaining four patients with positive SN who underwent diminished gastrectomy with lymphatic basin dissection at their request are alive 2.8, 6.0, 6.9 and 10.8 years after surgery without recurrence. (c) No patients who underwent diminished gastrectomy died of gastric cancer after surgery. (d) In the period following diminished gastrectomy, one patient underwent total gastrectomy and five patients underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection, and they survived for longer than 5 years. (e) As a result of SNNS, the gastric cancer-specific cumulative 5-year survival rate was 98.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Diminished gastrectomy during SNNS resulted in a satisfactory prognosis. However, regular follow-up after surgery is needed to detect secondary cancer of the remaining stomach.

Sentinel Node Navigation in Gastric Cancer: Where Do We Stand?

BACKGROUND

Early gastric cancer (EGC) is more common nowadays and is related a to low percentage of lymph node metastasis. For this reason, there is enormous interest to implicate minimally invasive approaches. Recently, special efforts have been made towards a potential intraoperative (real-time) lymph node metastasis (LNM) assessment, as nodal disease status could not be identified with precision before or during surgery. In this direction, accurate prediction of the LNM status through sentinel LN mapping has been attempted, as an approach to the intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). A careful literature search was conducted in order to clarify the potential clinical application of SN biopsy in the gastric cancer field.

CONCLUSION

The real clinical application of SN biopsy in gastric cancer treatment has been more than challenging due to the "complicated" nature of gastric lymphatic drainage and the high possibility of "skip" metastasis phenomenon. Notably, sophisticated technical aspects, such as the preferred tracer used and the potential "ideal" method to verify the presence of metastases in the resected SLNs, made SN biopsy application in gastric cancer field extremely demanding. Assessing the potential role of SN navigation for gastric cancer treatment in the era of advanced technology, where the minimally invasive surgical approaches are in the top of the scientific interest, it has to be highlighted that SN navigation for gastric cancer is a topic that remains highly controversial, and the need for future clinical trials on this topic is obvious.

Clinical application and outcomes of sentinel node navigation surgery in patients with early gastric cancer

Sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) has been recognized as a minimally invasive tool for individualized lymphadenectomy in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). The aim of this study was to compare clinicopathological factors, adverse events, and clinical outcomes between sentinel node mapping (SNM) and SN dissection (SND) groups and assess the clinical utility of SNNS in patients with EGC. The clinical data of 157 patients with EGC, diagnosed as clinical T1N0M0 with tumors ≤ 40 mm, undergoing SNNS between March 2004 and April 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-seven patients were excluded from the analysis. In the remaining 130 patients, 59 and 71 patients underwent standard lymphadenectomy for SNM and SND, respectively. The sentinel node detection rate in the SNM and SND groups was 98.3% (58/59) and 100% (71/71), respectively. Two (3.5%), 15 (25.9%), and 41 (70.7%) patients having sentinel nodes underwent total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy (PG), and distal gastrectomy (DG), respectively, in the SNM group. One (1.4%), 5 (7.0%), 10 (14.1%), 39 (54.9%), and 16 (22.5%) patients underwent PG, DG, segmental gastrectomy, local resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection, respectively, in the SND group. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the SNM and SND groups (P = 0.781). Survival did not differ between the both groups (P = 0.856). The present results suggest that personalized surgery with SND provides technical safety and curability related with a favorable survival outcome in patients with EGC.

Feasibility and diagnostic performance of dual-tracer-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in cT1-2N0M0 gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies

BACKGROUND

Dual-tracer-guided sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy may provide a promising diagnostic tool to assess accurately the status of lymph node metastasis in the surgical operation and assure the oncologic safety of the function or stomach preserving surgery. The diagnostic performance of this technology in recent studies varied. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at the PROSPERO. Eligible studies were searched in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases. A random-effect model was used to pool the data. Summary receiver operator characteristic curves, analysis for publication bias, meta-regression, and subgroup analysis were also performed.

RESULTS

The pooled SLN identification rate and sensitivity were 0.97 and 0.89. ^99mTc-human serum albumin with indocyanine green (ICG), ^99mTc-antimony sulfur colloid with ICG, performing SLN biopsy ≥15 min after dye injection, an SLN ≥5, the basin dissection, laparoscopic surgery, in studies conducted in Japan and studies published after 2012, were associated with higher sensitivity. CT1 stage, performing SLN biopsy ≥15 min after dye injection, in studies conducted in Japan and studies published after 2012, were related with a higher identification rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual tracer is promising in SLN biopsy in gastric cancer, and the clinical application of SLN biopsy should be limited to the patients of cT1N0M0 gastric cancer. The combination of ^99mTc-human serum albumin and ICG as well as the combination of ^99mTc-antimony sulfur colloid and ICG may be the optimal tracer combination. However, it seems not justified to put this technique into routine clinical application recently. Some factors that might enhance diagnostic value are identified.

Short-Term Dynamic Observation of the Color Change and Enhancement Effect of Polyethylenimine-Entrapped Gold Nanoparticles Used for Indirect Lymphography

AIMS

To dynamically observe the color change and enhancement effect of gadolinium-loaded polyethylenimine-entrapped gold nanoparticles (Gd-Au PENPs) as a dual-mode CT/MRI contrast agent for sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification.

METHODS

In 6 rabbits, Gd-Au PENPs were injected into the right side tongue submucosa, after which the color change of cervical draining lymph nodes was observed. Then the draining lymph nodes were examined by CT/MRI scan. Another 6 rabbits were randomly divided into a CT lymphography (CT-LG) and a MRI lymphography (MRI-LG) group and examined by CT/MRI scan 1 and 30 min after injection. Then SLNs were identified under the guidance of CT/MRI-LG.

RESULTS

The ipsilateral afferent lymphatic vessels, cervical draining lymph nodes and efferent lymphatic vessels were stained black orderly and constantly after Gd-Au PENPs injection. Thirty minutes after injection, all cervical lymph nodes were excised to be examined by CT/MRI scan, and only the black-stained draining lymph nodes were enhanced. The 6 rabbits with CT/MRI-LG showed clear enhancement of SLNs. With indirect lymphography, the black-stained SLNs were easily visualized at autopsy. In all rabbits, the identification rate of lingual SLNs was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Rabbit lingual SLNs could be identified with indirect lymphography using Gd-Au PENPs as a dual-mode contrast agent.