Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is Safe Both Day and Night

A novel preoperative score to predict severe acute cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

In a large multicenter trial, The Parkland Grading Scale (PGS) for acute cholecystitis outperformed other grading scales and has a positive correlation with complications but is limited in its inability to preoperatively predict high-grade cholecystitis. We sought to identify preoperative variables predictive of high-grade cholecystitis (PGS 4 or 5).

METHODS

In a six-month period, patients undergoing cholecystectomy at a single institution with prospectively graded PGS were analyzed. Stepwise logistic regression models were constructed to predict high-grade cholecystitis. The relative weight of the variables was used to derive a novel score, the Severe Acute Cholecystitis Score (SACS). This score was compared with the Emergency Surgery Acuity Score(ESS), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) preoperative score and Tokyo Guidelines (TG) for their ability to predict high-grade cholecystitis. Severe Acute Cholecystitis Score was then validated using the database from the AAST multicenter validation of the grading scale for acute cholecystitis.

RESULTS

Of the 575 patients that underwent cholecystectomy, 172 (29.9%) were classified as high-grade. The stepwise logistic regression modeling identified seven independent predictors of high-grade cholecystitis. From these variables, the SACS was derived. Scores ranged from 0 to 9 points with a C statistic of 0.76, outperforming the ESS ( C statistic of 0.60), AAST (0.53), and TG (0.70) ( p < 0.001). Using a cutoff of 4 or more on the SACS correctly identifies 76.2% of cases with a specificity of 91.3% and a sensitivity of 40.7%. In the multicenter database, there were 464 patients with a prospectively collected PGS. The C statistic for SACS was 0.74. Using the same cutoff of 4, SACS correctly identifies 71.6% of cases with a specificity of 83.8% and a sensitivity of 52.2%.

CONCLUSION

The Severe Acute Cholecystitis Score can preoperatively predict high-grade cholecystitis and may be useful for counseling patients and assisting in surgical decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Test/Criteria; Level III.

From mild to gangrenous cholecystitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe 24 hours a day

OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) at night remains controversial. Prior studies have not controlled for disease severity. We analyzed outcomes of LC performed day vs. night while controlling for the Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis (PGS).

METHODS

Analysis of the AAST multicenter evaluation of cholecystitis database was performed. Exclusion criteria included non-operative cases, open operations, and missing PGS. Cases were divided based on operation start time. PGS was used to control for disease severity. Outcomes included operative time, use of bailout techniques and complications.

RESULTS

Of 759 procedures identified, 16% were nighttime LC. No differences in demographics, comorbidities, physiologic variables and PGS were noted. Operative time (108.6 min vs 105.6), bailout techniques (8.3% vs 7.4%) and complications (9.9% vs 11.3%) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of severity, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe 24-h a day. Operations performed at night have a similar complication profile to those performed during the day.

Win or lose, nighttime transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is a win

Objectives

Although controversial, recent data suggest nighttime versus daytime laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) have comparable outcomes. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for choledocholithiasis decreases length of stay (LOS) as compared with LC with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) but increases case complexity/time. The influence of time of day on LCBDE outcomes has not been evaluated. Our aim was to examine outcomes and LOS for nighttime (PM) compared with daytime LC+LCBDE (DAY).

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent LCBDE were reviewed. Demographics, operative duration, success of LCBDE, time to postoperative ERCP (if required), LOS, and complications were compared. PM procedures were defined as beginning 19:00-07:00 hours.

Results

Between 2018 and 2022, sixty patients underwent LCBDE (PM 42%). Groups had equivalent age/sex and preoperative liver function tests (LFTs). LCBDE success was 69% PM versus 71% DAY (p=0.78). Operative duration did not differ (2.8 IQR: 2.2-3.3 hours vs. 2.8 IQR: 2.3-3.2 hours, p=0.9). LOS was compared, and PM LOS was shorter (p=0.03). Time to ERCP after a failed LCBDE at night was compared with daytime (13.8 IQR: 10.6-29.5 hours vs. 19.9 IQR: 18.7-54.4 hours, p=0.07). LOS for failed PM LCBDE requiring ERCP was similar to successful DAY LCBDE (p=0.29). One complication (transient hyperbilirubinemia) was reported in the DAY group, none in PM.

Conclusion

PM LCBDE cases are equivalent in safety and success rate to DAY cases but have reduced LOS. Widespread adoption of acute care surgery-driven management of choledocholithiasis via LCBDE during cholecystectomy may decrease LOS, especially in PM cases.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

Outcomes following out-of-hours acute cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed abdominal operations. Rising demands on acute operating theater availability and resource utilization in the daytime have led to acute cholecystectomy being performed out-of-hours (in the evenings, at night, or on weekends), although it remains unknown whether outcomes differ between out-of-hours and in-hours (during the daytime on weekdays) acute cholecystectomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes following out-of-hours versus in-hours acute cholecystectomy.

METHODS

The study protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021226127). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for studies comparing outcomes following out-of-hours and in-hours acute cholecystectomy in adults with any acute benign gallbladder disease. The outcomes of interest were rates of bile leakage, bile duct injury, overall postoperative complications, conversion to open cholecystectomy, specific intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of stay, readmission, and mortality. Subgroup (evening/night-time vs. daytime, weekend vs. weekday, acute surgical unit [ASU]-only, non-ASU, and laparoscopic-only) and sensitivity analyses of adjusted multivariate regression analysis results was also performed.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included. There were no differences between out-of-hours and in-hours acute cholecystectomy for rates of bile leakage, bile duct injury, overall postoperative complications, conversion to open cholecystectomy, operative duration, readmission, mortality, and postoperative length of stay. Higher rates of postoperative sepsis (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.41; p = 0.03) and pneumonia (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.26; p = 0.02) were observed following out-of-hours acute cholecystectomy on univariate meta-analysis, but not after the adjusted multivariate meta-analysis. Higher conversion rates were observed when out-of-hours cholecystectomy was performed in centers without an ASU.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis has not shown an increased risk in overall or specific complications associated with out-of-hours compared with in-hours acute cholecystectomy. However, future studies should assess the potential impact of structural hospital factors, such as an ASU, on outcomes following out-of-hours acute cholecystectomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study, Level IV.

Comparison of Outcomes of Emergency Laparotomies Performed During Daytime Versus Nights and Weekends in Rwandan University Teaching Hospitals

BACKGROUND

Emergency laparotomy is a common procedure with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess if the time of surgery (day versus night and weekend) affects the morbidity and mortality in a low-resource setting.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in 2 university teaching hospitals in Rwanda. Patient characteristics, time of laparotomy, operative details and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to determine factors and outcomes associated with time of surgery. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with mortality.

RESULTS

In 309 patients, who underwent emergency laparotomy, 147 (48%) patients were operated during the daytime, 123 (40%) patients were operated during the night shift and 39 (12%) patients were operated on the weekend. Common diagnoses were intestinal obstruction (n = 141, 46%), peritonitis (n = 101, 33%) and abdominal trauma (n = 40, 13%). The overall mortality rate was 16% with 14% in patients operated during day and 17% in patients operated during night and weekends (p = 0.564). Overall, the morbidity rate was 30% with 27% in patients operated during the day compared with 32% in patients operated during night/weekends (p = 0.348). After controlling for confounding factors, there was no association between time of operation and mortality or morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Morbidity and mortality associated with emergency laparotomy are high but the time of day for emergency laparotomy did not affect outcome in Rwandan referral hospitals.

Will surgeries performed at night lead to worse outcomes? Findings from a trauma center in Riyadh

As surgeries are performed around the clock, the time of surgery might have an impact on outcomes. Our aim is to investigate the impact of daytime and nighttime shifts on surgeons and their performance. We believe that such studies are important to enhance the quality of surgeries and their outcomes and help understand the effects of time of the day on surgeons and the surgeries they perform.A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the database from the King Abdulaziz Medical City trauma center. We selected 330 cases of patients between 2015 and 2018, who underwent a trauma intervention surgery within 24 hours after admission. Patients were aged 15 years and above who underwent 1 or more of the following trauma interventions: neurosurgery, general surgery, plastic surgery, vascular surgery, orthopedics, ophthalmology, and/or otolaryngology. We divided the work hours into 3 shifts: 8 AM to 3:59 PM, 4 PM to 11:59 PM, and midnight to 7:59 AM.Participants' mean age was 31.4 (standard deviation ± 13) years. Most surgeries occurred on weekdays (68.4%). Complications were one and a half times more on weekends, with 5 complicated cases on weekends (1.55%) and 3 (0.9%) on weekdays. Half of all surgeries were performed in the morning (152 cases, 53.15%); 73 surgeries (25.5%) were performed in the evening and 61 (21.3%) were performed late at night. Surgeries performed during late-night shifts were marginally better. Complications occurred in 4 out of 152 morning surgeries (2.6%), 2 out of 73 evening surgeries (2.7%), and only 1 out of 61 late-night surgeries (1.6%). The earlier comparison scored a P-value of >.99, suggesting that patients in morning and evening surgeries were twice more likely to experience complications than late-night surgeries.This study may support previous research that there is little difference in outcomes between daytime and nighttime surgeries. The popular belief that rested physicians are better physicians requires further assessment and research.

The "Off-Hour Effect" in Urgent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

The observation that patients may have worse outcomes after urgent therapeutic interventions performed during off-hours compared with on-hours is termed the "off-hour effect." This phenomenon has not been examined in urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Here we aimed to investigate the off-hour effect in urgent LC for acute cholecystitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study enrolled patients who underwent urgent LC for acute cholecystitis at our institution. On-hour LC was defined as a weekday operation starting between 9 AM and 9 PM; and off-hour LC as an operation on a weekend, or starting between 9 PM and 9 AM on a weekday. Patients were divided into on-hour and off-hour groups, and the operative outcomes of LC were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

The study included 371 patients, with 270 (72.8%) on-hour, and 101 (27.2%) off-hour operations. The 2 groups did not significantly differ in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rate to open surgery, incidence of postoperative complications, or duration of postoperative hospital stay.

DISCUSSION

Operative outcomes of urgent LC were comparable between the on-hour and off-hour groups, suggesting that there was no significant off-hour effect in urgent LC.