Impact of Geographic Socioeconomic Disadvantage on Minor Amputation Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes

Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Minor Amputation Conversion to Major Amputation

BACKGROUND

Minor lower extremity amputations (LEAs) have become an important part of the limb salvage approach but are not as benign as previously thought. This study investigates the difference in outcome between toe/ray versus midfoot amputations and the risk factors for major amputation conversion associated with each procedure.

METHODS

We performed retrospective chart review of foot amputation patients at a single tertiary care medical center with a primary end point of conversion to major amputation and secondary end points of 1-year wound healing and mortality rate. We collected data on relevant medical comorbidities, noninvasive vascular imaging, revascularization, repeat amputations, wound healing rate, and 1-year mortality. Patients were separated into toe/ray amputations versus midfoot amputation groups and compared using descriptive statistics, Chi-squared tests, Cox proportional hazards, and a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 375 amputations were included in the analysis. 65.3% (245 patients) included toe/ray amputations and 34.7% (130 patients) included midfoot amputations. We compared these 2 cohorts with regard to their rate of conversion to repeat minor and/or major amputation in addition to overall mortality. The toe/ray group underwent more repeat minor amputations within 1 year after index amputation (34.7% vs. 21.5%, P = 0.008) and wound healing (epithelization) at 90 days was also higher in this group. The midfoot group had a higher conversion to major LEA within 1 year on univariate analysis (20.8 vs. 6.9%, P < 0.001). Overall 1-year mortality was 6.17% and there was no significant difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

While there is a consistency with previous studies that found no significant overall difference in mortality between types of minor LEA, we have extended this previous work by demonstrating the independent risk factors for conversion to major amputation between types of minor LEA. Comparing these 2 groups will assist surgeons in choosing the appropriate level of amputations and will enhance patient's understanding of their chance of wound healing and risk of repeat amputation.

Association of neighborhood deprivation and hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hypertension impacts nearly one billion individuals and is a primary health challenge. While traditional perspectives have focused on individual behavior and genetics as principal risk factors, recent research underscores the profound influence of socioeconomic factors within neighborhoods on the risk of hypertension. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aimed to elucidate the association between neighborhood deprivation and the risk of hypertension.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception until December 25, 2023. Observational studies defining neighborhood deprivation and reporting hypertension incidence were included. Nested Knowledge software was used for screening and data extraction, with study quality assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Statistical analysis was performed with R software (V 4.3), using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled relative risk (RR).

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 22 in the meta-analysis, covering over 62 million participants. The pooled RR was 1.139 (95% CI: 1.006 - 1.290), p=0.04, indicating a higher hypertension risk in deprived neighborhoods. Subgroup analyses showed variability by country and deprivation assessment methods. RR varied from 1.00 in Japan (95% CI: 0.93-1.08) to 1.60 (95% CI: 1.07-2.39) in France and 1.57 (95% CI: 0.67-3.70) in Germany, with significant heterogeneity observed in measures of neighborhood deprivation.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis confirms a significant association between neighborhood deprivation and hypertension, underscoring the importance of socioeconomic factors in public health. It highlights the need for targeted local assessments and interventions. Future research should explore the causal mechanisms and effectiveness of interventions addressing neighborhood deprivation.

Identifying barriers to preventive care among First Nations people at risk of lower extremity amputation: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

First Nations people in Canada are overrepresented among those who have undergone nontraumatic lower extremity amputation, and are more likely to be younger, have diabetic foot infections and have no previous revascularization procedures than non-First Nations populations who have undergone lower extremity amputations. We sought to identify access barriers for high-risk First Nations patients, explore patients' experiences with health care systems and identify solutions.

METHODS

Employing a community participatory research design, we engaged representatives from 2 communities. They assisted with research design and data analysis, and approved the final manuscript. Using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach and purposeful sampling, we conducted 5 semistructured focus groups between August and December 2021 with community health care teams and patients at risk for, or who had previously undergone, a nontraumatic lower extremity amputation.

RESULTS

Patients' (n = 10) and community health care providers' (n = 18) perspectives indicated that barriers to health care access led to delayed care and increased complications and risk for lower extremity amputations, leading to aggressive procedures upon receiving care. Barriers to care led to negative experiences at urban centres and aggressive procedures created further distrust, leading to care disengagement and poor outcomes. Patients and providers both suggested building stronger partnerships between urban and rural health care providers, improving education for patients and health care providers and identifying innovative strategies to improve patients' overall health.

INTERPRETATION

Systemic changes, health promotional program and reliable on-reserve primary care are needed to create equitable access for First Nation patients at risk for lower extremity amputations. The study results imply that health care delivery for First Nations patients at risk for lower extremity amputations can be improved through stronger partnership and communication between urban and community providers, and continued education and cultural competency training for urban health care providers.

Editor's Choice - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Incidence and Risk Factors for Re-admission to Hospital in People with Diabetes Related Foot Disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically review the incidence and risk factors for 30 day re-admission to hospital following an index admission to treat diabetes related foot disease (DFD).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted using Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases.

METHODS

The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies that reported the rate of total or DFD related 30 day re-admissions were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model to calculate the pooled mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the proportion of patients re-admitted to hospital within 30 days. Meta-regression was performed to determine the association between risk factors and 30 day re-admission.

RESULTS

Sixteen retrospective studies with a total of 124 683 participants were included. The mean total 30 day re-admission rate was 22.0% (95% CI 17.0 - 27.0%) while the mean DFD related 30 day re-admission rate was 10.0% (95% CI 7.0 - 15.0%). Meta-regression found that greater prevalence of peripheral neuropathy (p = .045) was associated with a higher rate of any 30 day re-admission, and male sex (p = .023) and private health insurance (p = .048) were associated with lower rates of any 30 day re-admission. Coronary artery disease (p= .025) was associated with a higher rate of DFD related re-admission. All studies had low or moderate risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review suggested that about one fifth of patients with DFD are re-admitted to hospital within 30 days, of which about half are to treat DFD. Risk factors for re-admission included female gender, peripheral neuropathy, lack of private health insurance, and coronary artery disease.

Hospital Payer Mix and Amputation Rates Among Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Complications

BACKGROUND

/Objective: Studies have shown that Medicaid coverage is associated with higher rates of primary amputation among patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). We sought to identify whether hospital payer makeup also influences outcomes among these patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent treatment for foot complications in Texas were identified and aggregated by hospital. Hospitals were grouped by payer mix: low-income payer predominant vs high-income payer predominant. Variance analyses were used to find differences between the groups. Individual and hospital-level regression analyses were used to find associations with amputation rates.

RESULTS

Out of 21,592 patients, 9,098 (42%) underwent amputation. They presented to 337 hospitals out of which 49 (15%) had a low-income predominant payer mix and 109 (32%) had a high-income predominant payer mix. Patients at low-income payer predominant hospitals were more likely to present with gangrene (0.74 vs 0.65, p<0.01), undergo emergency admissions (0.67 vs 0.50, p<0.01), undergo amputation (0.53 vs 0.42, p<0.05), and incur higher per-day charges ($8145 vs $6790, p<0.05). At the individual level, despite risk-adjusting for disease-specific factors, amputation rate was associated with hospital payer mixes with greater proportions of Medicaid and lower proportions of commercially insured patients. At the hospital level, amputation rate was associated with higher proportion of Medicaid patients in hospital payer mix, lower hospital volumes, lower per-day charges, and higher gangrene and osteomyelitis rates (R²=0.30, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Higher proportion of Medicaid patients in a hospital payer mix is associated with an increased risk of primary amputation for PAD patients regardless of insurance coverage.

Social Aspects of Diabetic Foot: A Scoping Review

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a severe complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients with DFU have increased mortality and morbidity as well as decreased quality of life (QoL). The present scoping review aims to study the social issues of diabetic foot. Following PRISMA guidelines, the review was conducted in two databases (Scopus and Pubmed) with the use of the following keywords: “social aspects and diabetic foot”, “social characteristics and diabetic foot”, “social issues and diabetic foot”, “demographic profiles and diabetic foot”, “social determinants and diabetic foot”, “social capital and diabetic foot”, “social characteristics and gender and diabetic foot”, “social profiles and diabetic foot”, “social relationships and diabetic foot” and “social risk and diabetic foot”, from July to August 2021. Predetermined exclusion and inclusion criteria were selected. Forty-five studies (quantitative and qualitative) were eligible for inclusion in this review. Gender problems, socioeconomic status, social capital, and medical problems were the most important negative variables for diabetic foot. All the included variables reveal that the social impact of diabetic foot is the most important factor for management and prevention, in terms of aggravation and more, of the diabetic foot.

Geographical socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with adverse outcomes following major amputation in diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

Socioeconomic disadvantage is a known predictor of adverse outcomes and amputation in patients with diabetes. However, its association with outcomes after major amputation has not been described. Here, we aimed to determine the association of geographic socioeconomic disadvantage with 30-day readmission and 1-year reamputation rates among patients with diabetes undergoing major amputation.

METHODS

Patients from the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission Database who underwent major lower extremity amputation with a concurrent diagnosis of diabetes mellitus between 2015 and 2017 were stratified by socioeconomic disadvantage as determined by the area deprivation index (ADI) (ADI1 [least deprived] to ADI4 [most deprived]). The primary outcomes were rates of 30-day readmission and 1-year reamputation, evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 910 patients were evaluated (66.0% male, 49.2% Black), including 30.9% ADI1 (least deprived), 28.6% ADI2, 19.1% ADI3, and 21.2% ADI4 (most deprived). After adjusting for differences in baseline demographic and clinical factors, the odds of 30-day readmission was similar among ADI groups (P > .05 for all). Independent predictors of 30-day readmission included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.45), Medicare insurance (vs private insurance; OR, 1.76), and peripheral artery disease (OR, 1.49) (P < .05 for all). The odds of 1-year reamputation was significantly greater among ADI4 (vs ADI1; OR, 1.74), those with a readmission for stump complication or infection/sepsis (OR, 2.65), and those with CHF (OR, 1.53) or PAD (OR, 1.59) (P < .05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Geographic socioeconomic disadvantage is independently associated with 1-year reamputation, but not 30-day readmission, among Maryland patients undergoing a major amputation for diabetes. A directed approach at improving postoperative management of chronic disease progression in socioeconomically deprived patients may be beneficial to reducing long-term morbidity in this high-risk group.