Trends in Blunt Splenic Injury Management: The Rise of Splenic Artery Embolization

Potentially low-value operative care in abdominal trauma: A retrospective National Trauma Data Bank study

BACKGROUND

We currently lack national data on adherence to American College of Surgeons recommendations on nonoperative management for hemodynamically stable adults with solid-organ injuries. We aimed to estimate the incidence and interhospital variation in potentially low-value operative management for adults with blunt solid abdominal organ injuries.

METHODS

We included adults with blunt solid-organ injury eligible for nonoperative management (grades I-IV spleen and liver and grade I-III kidney, hemodynamically stable on arrival, and no blood products used in the emergency department) who were admitted to trauma centers in the United States that submitted data to the National Trauma Data Bank between 2016 and 2019. Low-value operative management was defined as laparotomy within 6 hours of admission. Interhospital variation was measured using risk-adjusted intraclass correlation coefficients (<5% low, 5-20% moderate, and >20% high).

RESULTS

In total, 62,601 adults in 324 American College of Surgeons-verified level I-III trauma centers and 297 state-designated centers were included. Adjusted incidences of potentially low-value operative management were 2.7% overall (6.8%, 2.1%, 0.8%, for spleen, liver, and kidney injuries) and 2.6%, 2.5%, and 3.0% for American College of Surgeons-verified level I, level II, and state-designated centers. Interhospital variation was moderate to high with a global intraclass correlation coefficient of 21% and intraclass correlation coefficients of 18%, 25%, and 21% for American College of Surgeons-verified level I, level II, and state-designated trauma centers, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that low-value operative management is uncommon in US trauma centers, but variation between same-level trauma centers is moderate to high. Future research should strive to identify determinants, and assess impact on patient outcomes.

Retrospective Observational Study of the Management of Blunt Traumatic Splenic Injury 2017-2022 at Major Trauma Centres in England. What is the Current Role of Splenic Artery Embolisation?

BACKGROUND

PURPOSE: To compare the treatment and outcomes of blunt splenic injury (BSI) management strategy within Major Trauma centres in England between 2017 and 2022.

METHODS

Data was extracted from UK TARN (Trauma Audit Research Network) identifying all splenic injuries admitted to English Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) between 01/01/17 and 31/12/21. Mechanism, injuries, treatment and outcomes were compared between management strategies according to American Association of Surgery in Trauma (AAST) grade over the period. The main endpoints of splenic salvage rate, along with mortality and length of stay were compared between the treatment options.

RESULTS

3,723 patients sustained BSI; 2,906 (78.1%) were managed conservatively, 491 (13.2%) underwent embolisation while 326 (8.8%) underwent splenectomy. There were 1895 (50.9%) AAST grade 2 injuries, 1019 (27.4%) grade 3, 592 (15.9%) grade 4 and 247 (6.6%) grade 5. Embolisation was successful (i.e. no subsequent splenectomy) for 465/491 (94.7%). The length of stay of discharged patients in the splenectomy group was longer than in those receiving embolisation (p = 0.001) or conservative management (p < 0.001) (median (IQR) of 12 (7, 27), 10 (6, 19), 10 (6, 20) days, respectively). Mortality at 30 days was not significantly different in those who underwent splenectomy (12.3%) compared to embolisation (8.6%) and conservative management (11.5%) (p = 0.129).

CONCLUSION

Splenic embolisation results in a high rate of splenic salvage.

Prophylactic embolization vs observation for high-grade blunt trauma splenic injury: a systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness of prophylactic angioembolization with observation as primary management strategies for patients with high-grade (grades 3-5) blunt trauma splenic injury.

INTRODUCTION

The spleen is commonly injured in abdominal trauma. Historical management practices involved splenectomy, but more recent evidence suggests an increased risk of severe infections and sepsis associated with this approach. Accordingly, nonoperative management strategies, including prophylactic splenic artery embolization and clinical observation, have gained prominence. This systematic review with meta-analysis directly compared angioembolization with clinical observation for high-grade splenic injuries only, aiming to provide clarity on this matter amid ongoing debates and variations in clinical practice.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review included adult patients aged 15 years or older with high-grade splenic injuries (grades 3-5) due to blunt trauma. Outcomes of interest include the need for further intervention (failure of management), mortality, complications, red blood cell transfusion requirements, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) was performed, with no restrictions on language or publication date. Gray literature was searched, including trial registries and relevant conference proceedings. After deduplication, 2 reviewers independently assessed titles and abstracts, and, subsequently, full-text articles for eligibility. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using standardized instruments from JBI. Data were extracted using predefined templates, and statistical meta-analysis was performed, where possible, using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using statistical methods, and potential publication bias was tested with a funnel plot. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included in this review. Methodological quality assessment indicated some risk of bias in most studies, with concerns primarily related to differences in injury severity and potential confounding factors. Meta-analysis revealed that prophylactic angioembolization significantly reduced risk of management failure by 57% (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.28-0.68, I2 =53%, 15 studies) and decreased patient mortality by 37% (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.93, I2 =0%, 9 studies) compared with clinical observation alone. There was a 47% reduction in risk of complications associated with prophylactic embolization compared with clinical observation (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.95, I2 =0%, 4 studies). Some statistical heterogeneity was observed, with I2 ranging from 0% to 53%. No significant differences were observed between the 2 management strategies for red blood cell transfusion requirements or hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review support the use of prophylactic embolization for high-grade blunt trauma splenic injuries, indicated by lower rates of management failure, reduced need for additional interventions, lower mortality, and fewer complications.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023420220.

Variation in Outcomes Associated With Blunt Splenic Injury Management

Introduction The management of blunt splenic injury has evolved to include splenic artery embolization in addition to non-surgical management, and splenic surgery. Though research has been conducted examining outcomes between management approaches, the inferential findings are often limited by single-site study designs and small sample sizes. However, results from large-scale prior studies can inform inference if a non-frequentist (Bayesian) framework is used. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine mortality and length of stay associated with blunt splenic injury management using both frequentist and Bayesian methods. Methods A total of 56 patients presenting with blunt splenic injury were included in this retrospective, single-center, quantitative study from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022 to inform both methodological approaches. Findings from a national retrospective sample of 117,743 patients presenting with blunt splenic injury between 2007 and 2015 were included in the prior distribution for the Bayesian estimates to provide sufficient statistical power and improve internal validity and generalizability of findings. Results Mortality rates and hospital mean length of stay were not significantly different between blunt splenic injury management approaches of non-operative management (n=43), surgery (n=7), and splenic artery embolization (n=6) using a frequentist approach (9.3%, 0%, and 0%, P=.52; and 10.8 (15.8), 10.8 (4.7), and 4.6 (1.8), P=.86, respectively). Bayesian 95% highest density interval (HDI) estimates of the likelihood of mortality ([0.02; 0.18], [-6.4e-23; 0.3], and [-2.2e-22; 0.3]) and hospital mean length of stay ([7.7; 8.3], [11.0; 12.3], and [8.7; 10.2]) provided reduced uncertainty in point and dispersion estimates. Conclusions The inclusion of findings from large high-quality studies provides increased certainty in estimates from smaller studies. Posterior estimates can inform predictive models for testing in future studies.

Complications and failure rate of splenic artery angioembolization following blunt splenic trauma: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Over recent decades, splenic angioembolization (SAE) as an adjunct to non-operative management (NOM) has emerged as a prominent intervention for patients with blunt splenic injuries (BSI). SAE improves patient outcomes, salvages the spleen, and averts complications associated with splenectomy. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the failure rate and complications related to SAE in patients with BSI.

METHODS

A systematic literature search (PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library) focused on studies detailing splenic angioembolization in blunt trauma cases. Articles that fulfilled the predetermined inclusion criteria were included. This review examined the indications, outcomes, failure rate, and complications of SAE.

RESULTS

Among 599 identified articles, 33 met the inclusion criteria. These comprised 29 retrospective studies, three prospective studies, and one randomized control trial. The analysis encompassed 25,521 patients admitted with BSI and 3,835 patients who underwent SAE. The overall failure rate of SAE was 5.3 %. Major complications predominantly were rebleeding (4.8 %), infarction (4.6 %), and abscess formation (4 %). Minor complications were fever (18.4 %), pleural effusion (13.1 %), and coil migration (3.9 %). Other complications included splenic atrophy, splenic cyst, hematoma, and access site complications such as splenic/femoral dissection. Overall, post embolization mortality was 0.08 %.

CONCLUSION

SAE is a valuable adjunct in managing BSI, with a low failure rate. However, this treatment modality is not without the risk of potentially serious complications.

Clinical factors and outcomes of spleen-conserving surgery versus total splenectomy in splenic injuries: A nationwide database study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with the use of spleen-conserving surgeries, as well as patient outcomes, on a national scale.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study (2010-2015) included patients (age≥16 years) with splenic injury in the National Trauma Data Bank. Patients who received a total splenectomy or a spleen-conserving surgery were compared for demographics and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, 18,425 received a total splenectomy and 1,825 received a spleen-conserving surgery. Total splenectomy was more likely to be performed for patients with age>65 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.63, p ​< ​0.001), systolic blood pressure<90 (OR: 0.63, p ​< ​0.001), heart rate>120 (OR: 0.83, p ​= ​0.007), and high-grade injuries (OR: 0.18, p ​< ​0.001). Penetrating trauma patients were more likely to undergo a spleen-conserving surgery (OR: 3.31, p ​< ​0.001). The use of spleen-conserving surgery was associated with a lower risk of pneumonia (OR: 0.79, p ​= ​0.009) and venous thromboembolism (OR: 0.72, p ​= ​0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Spleen-conserving surgeries may be considered for patients with penetrating trauma, age<65, hemodynamic stability, and low-grade injuries. Spleen-conserving surgeries have decreased risk of pneumonia and venous thromboembolism.

Angioembolization for splenic injuries: does it help? Retrospective evaluation of grade III-V splenic injuries at two level I trauma centers

Background

Splenic angioembolization (SAE) has increased in utilization for blunt splenic injuries. We hypothesized lower SAE usage would not correlate with higher rates of additional intervention or mortality when choosing initial non-operative management (NOM) or surgery.

Study design

Trauma registries from two level I trauma centers from 2010 to 2020 were used to identify patients aged >18 years with grade III-V blunt splenic injuries. Results were compared with the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) for 2018 for level I and II centers. Additional intervention or failure was defined as any subsequent SAE or surgery. Mortality was defined as death during admission.

Results

There were 266 vs 5943 patients who met inclusion/exclusion criteria at Stanford/Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC) versus the NTDB. Initial intervention differed significantly between cohorts with the use of SAE (6% vs 17%, p=0.000). Failure differed significantly between cohorts (1.5% vs 6.5%, p=0.005). On multivariate analysis, failure in NOM was significantly associated with NTDB cohort status, age 65+ years, more than one comorbidity, mechanism of injury, grade V spleen injury, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) 25+. On multivariate analysis, failure in SAE was significantly associated with Shock Index >0.9 and 10+ units blood in 24 hours. On multivariate analysis, a higher risk of mortality was significantly associated with NTDB cohort status, age 65+ years, no private insurance, more than one comorbidity, mechanism of injury, ISS 25+, 10+ units blood in 24 hours, NOM, more than one hospital complications, anticoagulant use, other Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥3 abdominal injuries.

Conclusions

Compared with national data, our cohort had less SAE, lower rates of additional intervention, and had lower risk-adjusted mortality. Shock Index >0.9, grade V splenic injuries, and increased transfusion requirements in the first 24 hours may signal a need for surgical intervention rather than SAE or NOM and may reduce mortality in appropriately selected patients.

Level of evidence

Level II/III.

Pseudoaneurysm after High-Grade Penetrating Solid Organ Injury and Utility of Delayed CT Angiography

BACKGROUND

Leaving an injured solid organ in situ allows preservation of structure function but invites complications from the damaged parenchyma, including pseudoaneurysms (PSAs). Empiric PSA screening after solid organ injury is not yet established, particularly following penetrating trauma. The study objective was definition of delayed CT angiography (dCTA) yield in triggering intervention for PSA after penetrating solid organ injury.

METHODS

Penetrating trauma patients at our American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 center with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade ≥3 abdominal solid organ injury (liver, spleen, kidney) were retrospectively screened (January 2017 to October 2021). Exclusions were age <18 y, transfers, death within <48 h, and nephrectomy/splenectomy within <4 h. Primary outcome was intervention triggered by dCTA. Statistical testing with ANOVA/chi-square compared outcomes between screened vs unscreened patients.

RESULTS

A total of 136 penetrating trauma patients met study criteria: 57 patients (42%) screened for PSA with dCTA and 79 (58%) unscreened. Liver injuries were most common (n = 41, 64% vs n = 55, 66%), followed by kidney (n = 21, 33% vs n = 23, 27%) and spleen (n = 2, 3% vs n = 6, 7%) (p = 0.48). Median American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade of solid organ injury was 3 (3 to 4) across groups (p = 0.75). dCTA diagnosed 10 PSAs (18%) at a median of hospital day 5 (3 to 9). Among screened patients, dCTA triggered intervention in 17% of liver patients, 29% of kidney patients, and 0% of spleen-injured patients, for an overall yield of 23%.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of eligible penetrating high-grade solid organ injuries were screened for PSA with dCTA. dCTA identified a significant number of PSAs and triggered intervention in 23% of screened patients. dCTA did not diagnose any PSAs after splenic injury, although sample size hinders interpretation. To avoid missing PSAs and incurring their risk of rupture, universal screening of high-grade penetrating solid organ injuries may be prudent.

Predictors of transfer from a remote trauma facility to an urban level I trauma center for blunt splenic injuries: a retrospective observational multicenter study

Background

The decision-making for admission versus emergent transfer of patients with blunt splenic injuries presenting to remote trauma centers with limited resources remains a challenge. Although splenectomy is standard for hemodynamically unstable patients, the specific criterion for non-operative management continues to be debated. Often, lower-level trauma centers do not have interventional radiology capabilities for splenic artery embolization, leading to transfer to a higher level of a care. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify specific characteristics of patients with blunt splenic injuries used for admittance or transfer at a remote trauma center.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was performed to examine the management of splenic injuries at a mountainous and remote Level III trauma center. Trauma patients ≥ 18 years who had a blunt splenic injury and initially received care at a Level III trauma center prior to admittance or transfer were included. Data were collected over 4.5 years (January 1, 2016 – June 1, 2020). Patients who were transferred out in > 24 h were excluded. Patient demographics, injury severity, spleen radiology findings, and clinical characteristics were compared by decision to admit or transfer to a higher level of care ≤ 24 h of injury. Results were analyzed using chi-square, Fisher’s exact, or Wilcoxon tests. Multivariable logistic models were used to identify predictors of transfer.

Results

Of the 73 patients included with a blunt splenic injury, 48% were admitted and 52% were transferred to a Level I facility. Most patients were male (n = 58), were a median age of 26 (21–42) years old, most (n = 62) had no comorbidities, and 47 had been injured from a ski/snowboarding accident. Compared to admitted patients, transferred patients were significantly more likely to be female (13/38 vs. 3/36, p = 0.007), to have an abbreviated injury scale score ≥ 3 of the chest (31/38 vs. 7/35, p = 0.002), have a higher injury severity score (16 (16–22) vs. 13 (9–16), p = 0.008), and a splenic injury grade ≥ 3 (32/38 vs. 12/35, p < 0.001). After adjustment, splenic injury grade ≥ 3 was the only predictor of transfer (OR: 12.1, 95% CI: 3.9–37.3, p < 0.001). Of the 32 transfers with grades 3–5, 16 were observed, and 16 had an intervention. Compared to patients who were observed after transfer, significantly more who received an intervention had a blush on CT (1/16 vs. 7/16, p = 0.02) and a higher median spleen grade of 4 (3–5) vs. 3 (3–3.5), p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that most patients transferred from a remote facility had a splenic injury grade ≥ 3, with concomitant injuries but were hemodynamically stable and were successfully managed non-operatively. Stratifying by spleen grade may assist remote trauma centers with refining transfer criteria for solid organ injuries.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13037-022-00339-4.