Preoperative Intravenous Iron Treatment in Colorectal Cancer: Experience From Clinical Practice

Oculofacial plastic surgery in the cancer patient: A narrative review

With the advances in systemic therapy and radiotherapy, the life expectancy of patients battling cancer has increased. The oculofacial plastic surgeon should be aware of the potential impacts a patient in remission or one being actively treated may pose. The goal of this review is to discuss the considerations a surgeon should have in this patient population.MethodsThe authors performed a computerized search using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. The search terms used were "chemotherapy AND surgery", "immunotherapy AND surgery", "radiotherapy AND surgery", "nutrition AND surgery", "(oculoplastic OR orbit OR eyelid OR lacrimal OR puncta) AND (chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy)", "(facial OR facial plastic OR oculoplastic) AND (chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy)", "(cancer OR malignancy) AND surgery", "(cancer OR malignancy) AND (surgery OR surgical) complications", "wound healing AND (cancer OR malignancy)", "infection AND (cancer OR malignancy)", "(bleeding OR blood loss) AND (cancer OR malignancy) AND surgery", "(chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy) AND wound healing", "(chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy) AND (bleeding OR blood loss)", "(chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy) AND infection".ResultsA total of 89 articles, published from 1993 to 2023 in the English language or with English translations were included. Articles published earlier than 2000 were cited for foundational knowledge. References cited in the identified articles were also used to gather further data for the review.Conclusions and RelevancePatients who are being treated for cancer or are undergoing current treatment for cancer require special considerations. Systemic therapies and radiotherapy impact the physiology of patients and the integrity of tissue in ways that significantly impact surgical interventions. It is imperative for the oculofacial plastic surgeon to have a complete understanding on how a previous or current diagnosis of cancer can influence surgical outcomes.

Postoperative Results After Patient Blood Management with Intravenous Iron Treatment Implementation for Preoperative Anemia: Prospective Cohort Study of 1294 Colorectal Cancer Patients

Background: PA is frequent in CRC patients and known to be detrimental to surgical outcomes. PBM systems promote rational use of blood products and PA treatment with IVI, which could potentially improve postoperative results and the need for RBCT. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Intravenous Iron (IVI) within a Patient Blood Management (PBM) pathway in Colorectal Cancer (CRC) patients with Preoperative Anemia (PA). To analyze surgical results after treatment and the need for Red Blood Cell Transfusion (RBCT) after surgery. Methods: Cohort study of CRC patients between 2012 and 2018, divided into groups: non-anemic patients (Hemoglobin Hb > 13 g/dL, Group 1), mildly anemic patients (Hb 12-13 mg/dL, Group 2), and patients treated with IVI (Hb < 12 mg/dL or Hb 12-13 mg/dL with risk factors, Group 3). Effectiveness of IVI treatment measured based on differences in Hb changes. Surgical complications were assessed and compared among groups, as well as the RBCT rate. The latter was also compared between Group 3 patients and those receiving preoperative RBCT. Results: Group 3 presented with a baseline Hb of 9.9 (±1.5) mg/dL with an increase of 1.2 (±1.9) mg/dL after treatment, which endured until discharge. Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications were 6.5%, and 30-day Mortality was 1.4% in all the series, without differences among Groups. RBCT rate in Group 3 patients was 21.6%, significantly lower than that of patients receiving preoperative RBCT (32.6%). Conclusions: IVI is a safe and effective measure for a fast PA correction in CCR patients and could potentially reduce postoperative RBCT rates.

Efficacy and safety of preoperative intravenous iron versus standard care in colorectal cancer patients with iron deficiency anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Anemia, particularly iron deficiency (ID) anemia, is common in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, affecting up to 58% of individuals. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of preoperative intravenous iron (IVI) with standard care (no iron or oral iron) in CRC patients with ID anemia.

Methods

A systematic search across multiple databases identified studies comparing IVI versus no iron or oral iron in CRC patients with ID anemia. Pooled data were analyzed for changes in hemoglobin (Hb) levels, need for red blood cell transfusions (RBCT), overall mean number of transfused RBC units, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and complications.

Results

The authors analyzed data from 11 studies with 2024 patients and found that IVI significantly increased Hb levels at crucial time points: preoperative (MD=1.17, 95% CI [0.95-1.40], P<0.01), postoperative day one (MD=1.32, 95% CI [0.89-1.76], P<0.01), hospital discharge (MD=0.76, 95% CI [0.28-1.24], P=0.002), and 30 days postoperative (MD=1.57, 95% CI [1.27-1.87], P<0.01). IVI significantly decreased the overall need for RBCT, particularly in the postoperative period (RR=0.69, 95% CI [0.52-0.92], P=0.01). It also reduced the mean number of transfused RBC units, total complications, and wound dehiscence. However, there were no significant differences in total death, hospital stay, infections, paralytic ileus, OS, or DFS.

Conclusion

Preoperative IVI significantly increased Hb levels at critical time points and markedly reduced the overall need for RBCT, complications, and wound dehiscence. To further validate these findings and ensure robust conclusions, more well-designed randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Approach to Patients with Cancer Going to Surgery

The preoperative care of patients with cancer plays a pivotal role in ensuring optimal outcomes and enhancing the overall quality of life for individuals undergoing surgical interventions. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the key considerations, challenges, and strategies involved in the preoperative management of oncology patients. We delve into the multidisciplinary approach required to address the unique needs of this patient population, emphasizing the importance of collaboration among surgeons, oncologists, anesthesiologists, primary care physicians, hospitalists, and other health care professionals.

The impact of iron deficiency on patients under evaluation for colorectal cancer, a prospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Iron deficiency affects more than 60% of colorectal cancer patients at the time of diagnosis. Iron deficiency ultimately leads to anemia, but additionally, iron deficiency might impact other domains of colorectal cancer patients' health and well-being. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of iron deficiency on fatigue, quality of life, cognition, and physical ability in patients undergoing evaluation for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Multicenter, prospective, observational cross-sectional study (2021-2023). Fatigue was the primary outcome, measured using the Focused Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Anemia questionnaire (FACT-An). Quality of Life, Cognition, Aerobe capacity, mobility, and peripheral muscle strength were tested as secondary outcomes. Multivariate analysis was performed to estimate the impact of iron deficiency on all outcomes.

RESULTS

Two hundred and one patients were analyzed, 57% being iron deficient. In multivariate regression analysis, iron deficiency was not associated with fatigue: FACT-An (r = -1.17, p = 0.57, 25% CI: -5.27 to 2.92). Results on quality of life, cognition, and mobility were non-significant and with small regression coefficients. Iron deficiency showed a nearly significant association with reduced hand-grip-strength (r = -3.47 kg, p = 0.06, 25%CI -7.03 to 0.08) and reduced 6 min walking distance (r = -40.36 m, p = 0.07, 25%CI: -84.73 to 4.00).

CONCLUSION

Iron deficiency in patients undergoing evaluation for colorectal cancer was not associated with fatigue, quality of life, or cognition, but might affect aerobic endurance and peripheral muscle strength to a degree that is clinically relevant.

Intravenous iron and iron deficiency anemia in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a prevalent hematological complication associated with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers due to an increased loss of iron and decreased iron absorption. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the use of parenteral iron to treat IDA in patients with GI cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, CINHAL and Scopus were searched from January 1, 2010 to September 29, 2023 with no language restrictions. We excluded editorials, case reports, abstracts, conference papers, and poster presentations. Studies were included if they discussed IDA, GI neoplasms, use of iron supplementation (with or without erythropoietin-stimulating agents [ESAs]), defined anemia and had an adult patient population. We assessed the efficacy of parenteral iron in comparison to other iron supplementation methods when treating IDA in patients with GI cancer. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 (RoB 2) and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tools were used to assess the quality of the included studies. Moreover, the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization data collection form was used to collect pertinent study information.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 3,969 studies across all databases. Twenty-one studies were included (6 randomized control trials; 15 non-randomized studies). Of the 15 studies evaluating hemoglobin (Hb) response, seven studies found an increase in Hb levels when patients were treated with IV iron. The 14 studies evaluating red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rates found conflicting differences in RBC transfusion needs when treated with IV iron. Studies analyzing health related outcomes typically found an increase in quality of life and decreased post-operative complications.

DISCUSSION

This review demonstrates improved outcomes of IDA in patients with GI cancer treated with IV iron instead of other iron supplementation methods. Timely diagnosis and appropriate IDA management can greatly improve quality of life in this patient population, especially if myelosuppressive chemotherapy is required.

Preoperative iron infusion does not reduce the requirement for blood transfusion in colorectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic blood transfusions (BT) for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery have demonstrated to increase postoperative morbidity and mortality. It has been suggested that the utilization of preoperative iron infusions may reduce the requirement for allogeneic BT in these patients. The aim of this project is to ascertain whether the preoperative use of intravenous iron is significantly associated with a reduction in perioperative blood transfusion requirement.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 130 patients was conducted in Blacktown Hospital, Australia. Data pertaining to patient demographics, as well as quantity of preoperative iron infusion and perioperative blood transfusion was collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-six (20%) patients required perioperative BT. Twenty-seven underwent preoperative iron infusion, with 20 of them not requiring BT and seven requiring BT. There was no evidence to suggest preoperative iron infusion reduces blood transfusion requirement (RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.57-4.18, P=0.39). For elective procedures, no significance was also demonstrated (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.29-4.92, P=0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence suggesting that preoperative iron infusion reduces the requirement for perioperative blood transfusion in colorectal cancer surgery.

Patient blood management in major digestive surgery: Recommendations from the Italian multisociety (ACOI, SIAARTI, SIdEM, and SIMTI) modified Delphi consensus conference

Patient blood management (PBM) is defined as the timely application of evidence-based medical and surgical concepts designed to maintain a surgical patient’s hemoglobin concentration, optimize hemostasis, and minimize blood loss in an effort to improve the outcomes. PBM is able to reduce mortality up to 68%, reoperation up to 43%, readmission up to 43%, composite morbidity up to 41%, infection rate up to 80%, average length of stay by 16%–33%, transfusion from 10% to 95%, and costs from 10% to 84% after major surgery. It should be noticed, however, that the process of PBM implementation is still in its infancy, and that its potential to improve perioperative outcomes could be strictly linked to the degree of adherence/compliance to the whole program, with decoupling and noncompliance being significant factors for failure. Therefore, the steering committees of four major Italian scientific societies, representing general surgeons, anesthesiologists and transfusion medicine specialists (Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani; Società Italiana di Anestesia, Analgesia, Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva; Società Italiana di Emaferesi e Manipolazione Cellulare; Società Italiana di Medicina Trasfusionale e Immunoematologia), organized a joint modified Delphi consensus conference on PBM in the field of major digestive surgery (upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, and hepato-biliopancreatic resections), whose results and recommendations are herein presented.

Association between different types of preoperative anemia and tumor characteristics, systemic inflammation, and survival in colorectal cancer

Background

Patients with colorectal cancer often have anemia and other symptoms after diagnosis, especially in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. This study explored the association between different types of preoperative anemia and tumor characteristics and inflammatory response in patients with colorectal cancer and to evaluate the prognosis of patients with different types of anemia before operation.

Methods

The clinical data of 95 patients with colorectal cancer treated in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from February 2016 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the hemoglobin concentration (Hb), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean hemoglobin content (MCH) and mean hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), the patients were divided into the non-anemia group, normal cell anemia group, and small cell anemia group. The three groups' general data, oncological characteristics, and mGPS scores were compared. The patients were followed up for five years, and the survival analysis was carried out. The cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze the prognostic factors of patients with colorectal cancer.

Results

The preoperative anemia rate of patients with colorectal cancer was 43.15% (41/95). There were significant differences in gender, weight loss, CA724, tumor location, tumor size, TNM stage, mGPS score, and positive expression rate of Ki-67 among different anemia groups. There was a significant difference in survival time among a non-anemia group, small cell anemia group, and normal cell anemia group (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, TNM stage, distant metastasis, mGPS score, Ki-67 positive expression rate, and anemia type were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The oncological characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with different types of preoperative anemia are different. Preoperative anemia and systemic inflammatory status are independent risk factors for the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients.

Preoperative intravenous iron treatment - a cohort study on colorectal cancer recurrence

BACKGROUND

Intravenous (i.v.) iron treatment has been speculated to increase the malignant potential of colorectal malignancies but also to enhance the immune systems potential to fight the invasive tumor. Clinical data however is very limited. We investigate if preoperative i.v. iron treatment is associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study on surgical CRC patients with iron deficiency anemia (1st March 2013 - 31st December 2019). Patients were grouped based on whether they had received preoperative treatment with i.v. iron. Local data was combined with data from the National Danish Health registries to identify recurrences, death, and emigration. Survival analysis, including Kaplan-Meyer curves and multivariate competing risk analysis adjusting for sex, age, ASA-group, tumor stage, surgical radicality, and miss match repair status was performed.

RESULTS

Of 1228 patients, 125 were available for analysis. 89 patients had received preoperative i.v. iron and 36 had not. The two groups were comparable on baseline and surgical characteristics. Median follow-up times were 4.74 in iron treated patients and 5 years in patients not receiving iron treatment. Five-year rate of non-recurrence was 85 % (0.74-0.91) in the i.v. iron treated group vs. 82 % (0.64-0.91) in the control group, non-significant difference. Multivariate survival analysis did not find iron treatment to be associated with recurrence rates (Hazard Ratio 0.88 (95 % ci; 0.31-2.51).

CONCLUSION

No association between preoperative i.v. iron treatment and the five-year cancer recurrence rate in iron deficient anemic CRC patients was found.

Preoperative anemia and long-term survival in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The impact of preoperative anemia on a survival outcome and the importance of correcting preoperative anemia in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) remain controversial. This study aimed to explore how preoperative anemia affects the long-term survival of patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study in which adult patients underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2014, at a large tertiary cancer center. A total of 7436 patients were enrolled in this study. Anemia was defined according to the diagnostic criteria of China (hemoglobin level < 110 g/L for women and < 120 g/L for men). The median follow-up time was 120.5 months (10.0 years). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score was used to reduce selection bias. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between patients with and without preoperative anemia using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the weighted log-rank test based on IPTW. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess factors associated with OS and DFS. Multivariable Cox regression was also used to assess red blood cell (RBC) transfusion associations between preoperative anemia and outcomes.

RESULTS

After IPTW adjustment, clinical profiles were similar, except that tumor location and TNM stage remained imbalanced between the preoperative anemia and preoperative non-anemia groups (p < 0.001). IPTW analysis showed that the 5-year OS rate (71.3 vs. 78.6%, p < 0.001) and the 5-year DFS rate (63.9 vs. 70.9%, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the preoperative anemia group. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative anemia was associated with poorer OS and DFS, while RBC transfusion may improve OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, p = 0.054) and DFS (HR 0.50, p = 0.020) in CRC patients with preoperative anemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative anemia is an independent risk factor for survival in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Strategies to reduce preoperative anemia in patients with CRC should be considered.