Feasibility and Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Multiethnic Asian Stroke Patients in Singapore

Effect of Intravenous Thrombolytic Dose of Alteplase on Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the long-term prognostic effects of different alteplase doses on patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

In this cohort study, we enrolled 501 patients with AIS treated with intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase, with the primary endpoint event of recurrence of ischemic stroke and the secondary endpoint event of death. The effects of different doses of alteplase on recurrence of ischemic stroke and death were analyzed using a Cox proportional risk model.

RESULTS

Among 501 patients with AIS treated with thrombolysis, 295 patients (58.9%) and 206 patients (41.1%) were treated with low-dose and standard-dose alteplase, respectively. During the study period, 61 patients (12.2%) had a confirmed recurrence of ischemic stroke. Multivariate Cox proportional risk analysis showed that standard-dose alteplase thrombolysis (HR 0.511, 95% CI 0.288-0.905, P = 0.021) was significantly associated with a reduced risk of long-term recurrence of AIS, whereas atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased risk of long-term recurrence of AIS. Thirty-nine (7.8%) patients died during the study period. Multivariate Cox proportional risk analysis showed that age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and symptomatic steno-occlusion were associated with an increased long-term risk of death from AIS. The alteplase dose was not associated with the risk of death from AIS.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard-dose alteplase treatment reduced the risk of long-term recurrence of AIS after hospital discharge and the alteplase dose was not associated with the long-term risk of death from AIS.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

The aim of the present meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose and standard-dose recombinant tissue plasminogen activators (r-tPA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The present meta-analysis was conducted according to the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies published between January 1, 2010, and January 31, 2023, using the following terms: "stroke," "alteplase," "doses," "efficacy," "tissue plasminogen activator," "r-tPA," and "safety." Primary efficacy outcomes included favorable outcomes (Modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2), while secondary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Safety outcomes included asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH assessed using the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) study and the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring (SITS-MOST) study. We also compared parenchymal hematomas as safety outcome between the two groups defined by the authors themselves in their research. A total of 16 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The meta-analysis did not report any significant difference between low-dose and standard-dose r-tPA in terms of mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), asymptomatic ICH, and parenchymal hematomas. However, the favorable outcome was significantly greater in patients receiving a standard dose of r-tPA.

Low-dose alteplase for the management of acute ischemic stroke in South Asians: A systematic review on cost, efficacy and safety

INTRODUCTION

South Asia is responsible for more than 40% of the stroke burden and stroke mortality in the developing world. South Asia, which is home to one-fourth of the world's population, is the most densely populated and one of the poorest regions. The majority of patients in this region are unable to afford intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). If low-dose alteplase proves effective and safe in South Asians, it may be a more cost-effective treatment option.

METHODS

The study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-Analyses) guideline. Researchers searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for English literature from 2005 to 2021. END, ENI, good functional outcome, SICH, and all-cause mortality were used to assess efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

In the low-dose alteplase treated patients, different studies reported 32 to 57% ENI 24 h after IVT, and 7% to 9.7% END. At 3 months follow-up, good functional outcome was achieved by 48%-76.92% of low-dose alteplase treated patients. SICH rates ranged from 0% to 16.6% across studies. Asymptomatic ICH occurred in 5-14% of patients. The mortality rate in all included studies varied from none to 25%.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review demonstrates that the use of low-dose alteplase for AIS in the South Asians offer comparable efficacy and reduced risk of SICH at a significantly lower cost than standard alteplase dose. Future well-randomized clinical trials are necessary to validate the findings of our study.

Different Doses of Intravenous Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background

This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by adopting a network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods

Studies comparing different doses of tPA in AIS were identified by retrieving electronic databases. NMAs of outcome measures included favorable functional outcome with a modified Rankin scale score (mRS) of 0 or 1 at 3 months after treatment (3M-FF), the functional independence with a mRS of 0, 1, or 2 at 3 months (3M-FI), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month all-cause mortality (3M-M). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month all-cause mortality (3M-M) were assessed. Probability-based ranking and surface under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) were performed to identify the best dose of tPA. Inconsistency was evaluated by node-splitting analysis and a loop-specific approach. Publication bias was analyzed by funnel plots.

Results

A total of 14 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The NMA results revealed no difference among low (<0.7 mg/kg), moderate (0.8 mg/kg), and standard (0.9 mg/kg) doses of tPA with regard to efficacy and safety. The SUCRAs of 3M-FF and 3M-FI showed that the standard dose ranked first, the moderate dose ranked second, and the low dose ranked third. The SUCRA of sICH showed that the standard dose ranked first (78.1%), the low dose ranked second (61.0%), and the moderate dose ranked third (11.0%). The SUCRAs of 3-month mortality showed that the standard dose ranked first (73.2%), the moderate dose ranked second (40.8%), and the low dose ranked third (36.1%). No significant inconsistency was shown by node-splitting analysis and no publication bias was shown in funnel plots.

Conclusion

Lower dose tPA was comparable to the standard dose with regard to efficacy and safety. Based on the SUCRA results and American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) guidelines, the standard dose was still the optimal selection for AIS.

Outcomes of stroke patients undergoing thrombolysis in Sri Lanka; an observational prospective study from a low-middle income country

Background

Stroke related deaths are relatively higher in low- and middle-income countries where only a fraction of eligible patients undergo thrombolysis. There is also limited evidence on post-thrombolysis outcomes of patients from Asian countries in these income bands.

Methods

This is a single center prospective observational study of a patient cohort with acute ischaemic stroke, undergoing thrombolysis with alteplase (low and standard dose), over a 24-month period in 2019/2020. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) for dependency at 3 months (primary outcome), duration of hospital stay, incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages and all-cause mortality at 3 months (secondary outcomes) were recorded. Demographic, clinical and treatment related factors associated with these outcomes were explored.

Results

Eighty-nine patients (males – 61, 69%, mean age: 60 years ±12.18) were recruited. Time from symptom onset to reperfusion was 174 min ± 56.50. Fifty-one patients were independent according to mRS, 11 (12.4%) patients died, and 11 (12.5%) developed symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages by 3 months. Functional independence at 3 months was independently associated with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission (p < 0.05). Thrombolysis with low dose alteplase did not lead to better or worse outcomes compared to standard dose.

Conclusions

On admission NIHSS is predictive of functional independence at 3 months post-thrombolysis. Low dose alteplase may be as efficacious as standard dose alteplase with associated cost savings, but this needs to be confirmed by a prospective clinical trial for the Sri Lankan population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-021-02475-3.

Impact of estimated-weight-base dose of alteplase in acute stroke treatment on clinical outcome

Dosing of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) for acute ischemic stroke treatment is often based on estimated body weight (BW) worldwide in routine clinical practice due to infeasible of accurate BW measurement. The aim of our study is to explore the impact of estimated BW when dosing rt-PA in acute ischemic stroke treatment on clinical outcome. Between January 2013 to May 2018, 126 acute ischemic stroke patients received intravenous rt-PA treatment based on estimated BW dosage were recruited. All patients had actual BW measured in ward after treatment. Based on the dosage of rt-PA given, patients were categorized into three groups, standard dose (0.8-1.0 mg/kg), overdose (>1.0 mg/kg), and underdose (<0.8 mg/kg). Among all 126 patients, 101 (80.2%) patients were treated with standard dose, 12 (9.5%) patients with overdose, and 13 (10.3%) patients with underdose of rt-PA respectively. There was no significant difference between demographic characteristics, pre-morbid risk factors, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at 24 h, NIHSS score at discharge, modified Rankin scale (mRS) within 0 to 2 in discharge or in 3 months after the event within the three groups. There was also no significant difference in hemorrhagic transformation and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). In conclusion, calculation of the dose of rt-PA based upon the estimated BW to treat acute ischemic stroke patients had no negative impact on the clinical outcome in our study.

Who may benefit from lower dosages of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator? Results from a cluster data analysis

Background

The risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) after thrombolysis is low but severe. Lower dose of alteplase may reduce the risk of sICH. We aim to identify subsets of patients who could benefit from lower dose of alteplase compared with standard dose.

Methods

Data from two observational registries were pooled together. A total of 3479 patients who had acute ischaemic stroke were entered into the interaction tree model. The response variable was the rate of sICH per the definition of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Study. Clinical improvement was measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and defined as NIHSS 0 or 1 or an improvement of more than 4 points (within 7 days or at discharge). Rare event logistic regression was performed to analyse the OR of safety outcome.

Results

To optimise the interaction effect between tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) dosage (standard/lower) and patient subgroups, three subgroups based on the severity of stroke were identified: (1) NIHSS ≤4, (2) NIHSS between 5 and 14, and (3) NIHSS ≥15. The estimated difference of OR of having sICH was 2.71 (95% CI 0.80 to 7.69, p=0.10) for mild, 0.13 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.68, p=0.01) for moderate, and 0.65 (95% CI 0.19 to 2.55, p=0.52) for severe, respectively. In addition, patients who had moderate stroke treated with lower dose had comparable efficacy outcome (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.13, p=0.45).

Conclusion

Our analysis demonstrated that in patients who had moderate stroke, lower doses of alteplase are associated with significant sICH reduction and non-inferior performance in efficacy, compared with those in the standard dose group.

Trial registration number

The TIMS-China was a national prospective stroke registry on thrombolytic therapy using intravenous tPA in patients who had acute ischaemic stroke. The results were initially published in 2012 without a clinical trial registration number. The Shanghai Stroke Service System was registered at www.clinicaltrial.gov (NCT02735226).

The First 10 Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Lao People's Democratic Republic under Teleconsultation from Thailand

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke patients in Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) are unable to access the intravenous thrombolytic therapy using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) due to various reasons.

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of thrombolytic therapy administration at Mittaphab Hospital, Lao PDR under the international telestroke consultation system from King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thailand.

METHODS

Acute ischemic stroke patients who presented at Mittaphab Hospital within 4.5 hours after the onset and received thrombolytic therapy between December 2016 and June 2017 were studied. An immediate real time teleconsultation with 24 hours availability between neurologists at Mittaphab hospital and the Chulalongkorn stroke team was performed in all cases for patient evaluation and decision for thrombolytic treatment.

RESULTS

There were 205 patients with acute stroke, 28 patients (14%) arrived at the hospital within 4.5 hours after the onset. Ten patients (5%) were eligible for intravenous rtPA. The mean duration from onset to hospital arrival was 122.50 minutes and the mean door to needle time was 108 minutes. The mean National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) before thrombolysis was 10. At 90 days, the mean NIHSS was 3 and the mean mRS was 2. Seventy percent of patients had good outcome (mRS ≤2). Only one patient developed massive cerebral infarction. None of the patient developed symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or major bleedings.

CONCLUSIONS

Telestroke consultation from Thailand can facilitate the thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke patients in Lao PDR.

Temporal Trends and Predictors of Drug Utilization and Outcomes in First-Ever Stroke Patients: A Population-Based Study Using the Singapore Stroke Registry

INTRODUCTION

Drug utilization and outcomes research in multi-ethnic Asian stroke populations is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to examine temporal trends and predictors of drug utilization and outcomes in a multi-ethnic Asian stroke population.

METHODS

This registry-based study included ischemic and hemorrhagic first-ever stroke patients hospitalized between 2009 and 2016. Utilization of medications included in-hospital thrombolytic agents, early antithrombotics (antiplatelets, anticoagulants) within 48 h of admission, and antithrombotics and statins at discharge. Outcomes analyzed were in-hospital all-cause mortality; 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year case fatality (CF); and discharge destination.

RESULTS

Of the 36,615 included patients, 81.6% had ischemic stroke and 18.4% had hemorrhagic stroke (15.5% intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH] and 2.8% subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH]). For ischemic stroke, the combined use of all three guideline medications (in-hospital thrombolytic therapy, as well as antithrombotics and statins at discharge) increased (P = 0.006). Being on the stroke pathway was associated with prescription of all three guideline medications in ischemic stroke. Decreasing trends for in-hospital mortality, 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year CF and proportion of patients discharged home without rehabilitation appointment were observed in ischemic stroke (P < 0.05) but not in ICH or SAH (apart from 28-day CF). Ischemic stroke patients who received guideline medications were less likely to die or be discharged to nursing homes and chronic sick hospitals. Hemorrhagic stroke patients prescribed statins at discharge were less likely to have 28-day and 1-year CF.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescription of secondary stroke preventive medications (particularly in ischemic stroke) was associated with more favorable outcomes, highlighting the importance of physician adherence to evidence-based pharmacotherapy.

Low-dose rt-PA may not decrease the incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in patients with high risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) has been used as the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The following study investigates whether low-dose rt-PA can decrease the incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) in AIS patients with high-risk sICH compared to standard-dose rt-PA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the Thrombolysis Implementation and Monitor of Acute Ischemic Stroke in China (TIMS-China) studies were assessed to explore risk factors for sICH after intravenous thrombolysis. For high-risk sICH patients (age ≧70 years old, or with diabetes, or serum glucose on admission >9.0 mmol/L, or NIHSS on admission>20, or with cardioembolism), standard-dose rt-PA (0.85 to 0.95 mg/kg) and low- dose rt-PA (0.5 to 0.7 mg/kg) were compared. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of sICH, and the secondary outcome measures were 7-day mortality and 90-day functional independence outcome (modified Rankin scale, 0-2).

RESULTS

A total of 554 patients were enrolled (60 cases for low dose, and 494 cases for standard dose). Median rt-PA doses were 0.63 and 0.90 mg, respectively. After adjustment for the baseline variables, low-dose rt-PA did not decrease the incidence of sICH (per SITS-MOST criteria, 3.33% versus 2.23%, P = 0.3467) compared to low dose. The low-dose group revealed less functional independence outcomes (modified Rankin scale, 0-2) compared to standard-dose group (36.67% versus 52.43%; odds ratio = 0.49; p = 0.0204) at 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that low-dose intravenous rt-PA for high-risk sICH stroke in Chinese patients may not decrease the incidence of sICH, and concomitant with a poor outcome compared to standard-dose rt-PA.

ABBREVIATIONS

rt-PA: recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; AIS: acute ischemic stroke; sICH: symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage.

Low-dose versus standard-dose intravenous alteplase for octogenerian acute ischemic stroke patients: A multicenter prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The optimal dose of alteplase for acute ischemic stroke among geriatric patients is unclear. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) and standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) alteplase for varying severity of Asian geriatric stroke patients.

METHODS

The favorable functional outcome on day 90 after stroke onset, and the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) rate following 24-36 h of intravenous alteplase were measured. The baseline NIHSS of 4-8, 9-13, ≥14 were defined as mild, moderate, and high severity, respectively.

RESULTS

Totally, 249 geriatric patients treated with low-dose (n = 108) and standard-dose (n = 141) alteplase. Compared to standard-dose alteplase, low-dose alteplase had decrease in favorable functional outcome (22.2% versus 34.8%), and no difference in SICH rates was observed. For mild severity patients, the mortality was significantly increased with standard-dose alteplase (the NNT/NNH = 22.9/8.0 for mild severity, the NNT/ NNH = 15.0/14.7 for moderate severity, and the NNT/NNH = 13.5/19.6 for high severity).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard-dose and low-dose alteplase were comparable in reducing major disability, but low-dose alteplase for mild stroke showed much reduced mortality on day 90 for octogenarians.

Predictors of functional outcome in patients with stroke thrombolysis in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous (IV) thrombolysis with alteplase (rt-PA) is effective in ischaemic stroke. The primary objective was to evaluate predictors of functional outcome in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with IV rt-PA. The secondary objective was to assess the outcome with the modified Rankin scale (mRS). We also examined the predictive value of the Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events (THRIVE) score.

METHODS

AIS patients treated with IV rt-PA from February 2012 to August 2016 were recruited. Demographic data, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, timing and neuroradiological findings were recorded. Patients received a dose of 0.9 mg/kg IV rt-PA within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. mRS score was evaluated at discharge and three months, and good and poor clinical outcomes were defined as scores of 0-2 and 3-6, respectively. Baseline THRIVE scores were assessed.

RESULTS

36 patients received IV rt-PA. 20 (55.6%) patients had an mRS score of 0-2 at three months. Based on THRIVE score, 86.1% had a good or moderately good prognosis. On univariate analysis, poor outcome was associated with NIHSS score before rt-PA (p = 0.03), THRIVE score (p = 0.02), stroke subtype (p = 0.049) and diabetes mellitus (DM; p = 0.06). Multiple logistic regression showed that outcome was significantly associated with NIHSS score before rt-PA (p = 0.032) and DM (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

Our newly developed Malaysian IV rt-PA service is safe, with similar outcomes to the published literature. Functional outcome after thrombolysis was associated with baseline NIHSS score and DM.

Current status of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator dosage for acute ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic review

The optimal dose of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) remains controversial, especially in Asian countries. We aimed to update the evidence regarding the use of low-dose versus standard-dose rtPA. We performed a systematic literature search across MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) from inception to 22 August 2016 to identify all related studies. The outcomes were death or disability (defined by modified Rankin Scale 2–6), death, and symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH). Where possible, data were pooled for meta-analysis with ORs and corresponding 95% CIs by means of random-effects or fixed-effects meta-analysis. We included 26 observational studies and 1 randomised controlled trial with a total of 23 210 patients. Variable doses of rtPA were used for thrombolysis of AIS in Asia. Meta-analysis shows that low-dose rtPA was not associated with increased risk of death or disability (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.33), or death (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.01), or decreased risk of sICH (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.72). The results remained consistent when sensitivity analyses were performed including only low-dose and standard-dose rtPA or only Asian studies. Our review shows small difference between the outcomes or the risk profile in the studies using low-dose and/or standard-dose rtPA for AIS. Low-dose rtPA was not associated with lower risk of death or disability, death alone, or sICH.

Comparative Analysis on Low- and Standard-Dose Regimes of Alteplase Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Efficacy and Safety

Objective: This study analyzed the efficacy and safety of low-dose and standard-dose alteplase intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: Patients with AIS who underwent intravenous alteplase thrombolysis from July 2012 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed and correspondingly divided into low-dose (0.6–0.89 mg/kg) group and standard-dose group (0.9 mg/kg) according to alteplase dosage. The clinical outcome was evaluated by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days after onset. The safety index was the mortality at 90 days after onset and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) within 7 days. Results: A total of 1,486 patients were included (1,115 cases in low-dose group and 371 cases in standard-dose group). There were no significant differences in baseline data between the 2 groups. As mRS, good outcome rate as well as mortality rate in both groups had no significant difference (36.1 vs. 37.6%; χ2 = 10.882, p = 0.890; 5.5 vs. 7.3%; χ2 = 2.163, p = 0.076), but the incidence of SICH in low-dose group was significantly lower than that of the standard-dose group (2.2 vs. 5.9%; χ2 = 3.157, p = 0.001). Conclusion: The efficacy of low-dose alteplase intravenous thrombolytic therapy for AIS was equivalent to the standard-dose regimen but with higher safety.

Low- versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Updated Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety between low- and standard-dose intravenous (IV) tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and EMBASE for relevant studies from inception to June1, 2017. Cohort or randomized controlled studies for AIS within 4.5 hours of symptom onset with comparison between low-dose and standard-dose tPA were included. The primary efficacy end point was favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin scale scores [mRS] of 0-1) at 90 days. The primary safety end point was the incidence rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). The secondary end points were independent functional outcome (mRS scores of 0-2) and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were pooled in this meta-analysis. The low-dose strategy appeared to be as effective as standard-dose tPA (43.4% versus 45.4%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.10; P = .38) in primary efficacy outcome. The secondary efficacy outcome produced similar results (57.3% versus 57.0%; OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86-1.05; P= .33). There was no evidence of statistical difference for sICH (4.2% versus 4.9%; OR = 1.02 [0.66-1.55]; P = .94) and mortality (9.0% versus 10.6%; OR = 0.99 [0.74-1.31]; P = .92) at 90 days between low- and standard-dose therapy. In a subgroup analysis by ethnicity, there was no significant difference between patients of Asian and non-Asian descent for any of the end points.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that AIS patients receiving low-dose IV-tPA had comparably efficacy and safety to those receiving standard-dose IV-tPA. However, the effect is especially pronounced within the Asian population, which limits the generalizability of these results.

Efficacy and safety of low dose alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis in Asian stroke patients: a meta-analysis

Whether low dose alteplase is comparable to standard dose in efficacy and safety for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in Asian stroke patients remains unverified. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Database from the beginning to June 30, 2017 were searched. IVT efficacy was measured by favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale scores of 0–1) at 3 months, and safety measured by mortality within 3 months and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH). Pooled estimates were conducted using fixed- or random-effects model depending on heterogeneity. For SICH, studies were pooled separately according to different definitions. Twelve studies involving 7,905 participants were included. No association was found between alteplase dose and favorable outcome (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.78–1.14, P = 0.5; heterogeneity: P_hetero = 0.01, I² = 57.3%) and mortality (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.74–1.02, P = 0.08; P_hetero = 0.83, I² = 0) using random- and fixed-effects models, respectively. Low dose alteplase was associated with lower SICH as defined by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke study (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.99, P = 0.04; P_hetero = 0.57, I² = 0) using fixed-effects model. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis could change the results significantly. Current limited evidence was insufficient to support the speculation that low dose alteplase was comparable to standard dose in thrombolytic efficacy and safety in Asian stroke patients.

Review of acute ischaemic stroke in Pakistan: progress in management and future perspectives

Ischaemic stroke is a major cause of neurological morbidity and mortality. The objective of this review article is to summarise facts pertaining to acute ischaemic stroke and its various aspects in a developing country like Pakistan, where resources are limited and the healthcare system is underdeveloped. No large-scale epidemiological studies are available to determine the true incidence of stroke in Pakistan. We reviewed the available literature on stroke from Pakistan and through this article we primarily aim to present the current acute ischaemic stroke management in Pakistan in juxtaposition to that of the developed world. We also intend to highlight areas for future development and improvement in management. The routine practice in Pakistan is that of using stat dose of aspirin in emergency (ER) at large with only a handful of centres offering thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke. This too is faced with the problem of long window periods before the patient reaches a proper stroke care centre. The facilities of interventional therapies like arterial thrombolysis and endovascular surgery are non-existent and rehabilitation facilities limited. The opportunities for training physicians in acute stroke are also scarce. Stroke in children is underdiagnosed and that in women not availing facilities at stroke care centres. While basic research has gained pace regarding local demographic data, advanced research and genetic studies are extremely limited. The field of stroke neurology needs to grow at a substantial pace in Pakistan to be at par with the developed world.

Low-dose intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke: an alternative or a new standard?

BACKGROUND

With the recent publication of a large clinical trial on the use of a lower dose of intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), the concept of using a different dose has been debated. We intend to review the literature on using a lower dose of IV tPA and gain a better understanding of the impact of different IV doses on the treatment of patients with AIS.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the related topics in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and MEDLINE was carried out. Key words used include low dose IV tPA, thrombolysis, Alteplace and tPA for AIS. Findings were tabulated according to the size of the cohort studied, outcome, adverse event and level of evidence. The results of all studies using lower doses were analysed for efficacy and adverse events.

RESULTS

From 1992 to 2016, there were 23 trials that included 10 950 patients published on the use of lower doses of IV tPA for AIS. Doses ranged from 0.5, 0.6, 0.75 to 0.85 mg/kg. Most were observational, retrospective and registry studies. One was a prospective open-label randomised controlled trial. 13 trials combined lower doses of IV tPA with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor or thrombectomy. Patients treated with lower doses of IV tPA showed a trend of lower rate of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and mortality at 3 months but slightly more disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower doses of IV tPA showed less haemorrhagic events but were not more effective compared with the standard dose. The optimal low dose of IV tPA remains unclear. Patients with AIS with a high risk of developing sypmtomatic intracranial haemorrhage might benefit from lower dose IV tPA, such as 0.6 mg/kg.

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: a feasibility and safety study

Background

In developing countries, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is available at a limited number of centers. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of IVT at Tabriz Imam Reza Hospital.

Methods

In a prospective study, over a 55-month period, any patient at the hospital for whom stroke code had been activated was enrolled in the study. Data on demographic characteristics, stroke risk factors, admission blood pressure, blood tests, findings of brain computed tomography (CT) scans, time of symtom onset, time of arrival to the emergency department, time of stroke code activation, time of CT scan examination, and the time of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator administration were recorded. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale assessments were performed before IVT bolus, at 36 hours, at either 7 days or discharge (which ever one was earlier), and at 3-month follow-up. Brain CT scans were done for all patients before and 24 hours after the treatment.

Results

Stroke code was activated for 407 patients and IVT was done in 168 patients. The rate of functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–1) at 3 months was 39.2% (62/158). The mortality rate at day 7 was 6% (10/168). Hemorrhagic transformation was noted in 16 patients (9.5%). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 5 (3%), all of which were fatal. One case of severe urinary bleeding and one other fatal case of severe angioedema were observed.

Conclusion

During the first 4–5 years of administration of IVT in the hospital, it was found to be feasible and safe, but to increase the efficacy, poststroke care should be more organized and a stroke center should be established.

Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke in Asian Populations: A Meta-Analysis

Recent studies have investigated the most efficacious dose of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. There remains no definitive consensus concerning the superior efficacious IV-tPA dose (standard- vs. low-dose), prompting us to perform a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety profile of standard- versus low-dose IV-tPA.We identified relevant studies pertaining to the specific aim of our meta-analysis by searching PubMed and EMBASE (January 1990-September 2015) Either a fixed- or random-effects model was employed (dependent upon data heterogeneity) to analyze the efficacy and safety outcome.Ten cohort studies involving 4389 sum patients were included in the meta-analysis. By using the random-effects model, the meta-analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-1) at 3 months (heterogeneity: χ = 17.45, P = 0.04, I = 48%; OR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.71-1.11]; P = 0.28) and incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) (heterogeneity: χ = 14.41, P = 0.11, I = 38%; OR: 1.19 [95% CI: 0.76 to 1.87]; P = 0.45) between the standard- and low-dose groups. The fixed-effects model demonstrated no significant difference in mortality within 3 months (heterogeneity: χ = 6.73, P = 0.57, I = 0%; OR: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.73-1.12]; P = 0.37) between the standard- and low-dose groups.Low-dose IV-tPA is comparable to standard-dose IV-tPA in both efficacy (favorable functional outcome) and safety (SICH and mortality). Confirmation of these findings through randomized trials is warranted.

Low-Versus Standard-Dose Alteplase for Ischemic Strokes Within 4.5 Hours: A Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) alteplase strategy to treat acute ischemic stroke patients became widespread in East Asian countries, without rigorous testing against standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) alteplase treatment. Our aim was to investigate the comparative effectiveness and safety of the low-dose versus standard-dose intravenous alteplase strategy.

METHODS

A total of 1526 acute ischemic stroke patients who qualified for intravenous alteplase and treated within 4.5 hours were identified from a prospective, multicenter, and nationwide stroke registry database. Primary outcomes were a modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 1 at 3 months after stroke and occurrence of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation. Inverse probability of low-dose alteplase weighting by propensity scores was used to remove baseline imbalances between the 2 groups, and variation among centers were also accounted using generalized linear mixed models with a random intercept.

RESULTS

Low-dose intravenous alteplase was given to 450 patients (29.5%) and standard-dose intravenous alteplase to 1076 patients (70.5%). Low-dose alteplase treatment was comparable to standard-dose therapy according to the following adjusted outcomes and odds ratios (95% confidence intervals): modified Rankin scale score 0 to 1 at 3 months and 0.95 (0.68-1.32); modified Rankin scale 0 to 2 at 3 months and 0.84 (0.62-1.15); symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation and 1.05 (0.65-1.70); and 3-month mortality and 0.54 (0.35-0.83). The associations were unchanged when the analysis was limited to those without endovascular recanalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The low-dose alteplase strategy was comparable to the standard-dose treatment in terms of the effectiveness and safety.

Intravenous thrombolysis for acute stroke: current standards and future directions

OPINION STATEMENT

Intravenous thrombolysis with the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator alteplase is the standard of care for patients with acute ischaemic stroke presenting within 4.5 h of symptom onset. The odds of independent survival decline steeply with longer time to treatment delivery, reflecting progressive ischaemic damage to the brain. Standards accordingly emphasise optimisation of patient pathways to minimise treatment delays. Observational data and international clinical guidelines support the safety and efficacy of alteplase in many patient groups currently excluded from treatment (e.g. seizure at onset, concomitant diabetes and previous stroke) on the basis of historical clinical trial criteria. Future evolution of thrombolysis will optimise dosing, apply advanced imaging to extend treatment to groups currently excluded and investigate novel drugs, and adjunctive drug and device therapies. To date, trials of novel therapeutic approaches that have been applied at later time points have failed to demonstrate benefit, suggesting that the future gains are likely to arise from applications within current time windows.

Thrombolysis for Acute Ischaemic Stroke with Alteplase in an Asian Population: Results of the Multicenter, Multinational Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Non-European Union World (SITS-NEW)

Background

Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Non-European Union World was a multinational, prospective, open, monitored, observational study of intravenous alteplase as thrombolytic therapy in clinical practice. Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Non-European Union World was required to assess the safety of alteplase in an Asian population by comparison with results from the European Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study and pooled results from randomized controlled trials.

Aims and/or hypothesis

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous alteplase (0·9 mg/kg) as thrombolytic therapy within three-hours of onset of acute ischaemic stroke in an Asian population.

Methods

The 591 patients included were treated at 48 centers in four countries (South Korea, China, India, and Singapore) between 2006 and 2008. Primary outcomes were symptomatic (deterioration in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥4 or death within the first 24 h) intracerebral haemorrhage type 2 22–36 h after the thrombolysis and mortality at three-month follow-up. The secondary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) at three-months. Results were compared with those from Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study ( n = 6483) and pooled results of patients ( n = 415) who received intravenous alteplase (0·9 mg/kg) zero- to three-hours from onset of stroke symptoms in four randomized controlled trials (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke A and B, Altephase Thrombolysis for Acute Noninterventional Therapy in Ischaemic Stroke, and European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II).

Results

Results are presented as Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Non-European Union World vs. Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study vs. pooled randomized controlled trials. Median age was 64 vs. 68 vs. 70 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline was 12 vs. 12 vs. 13, time from stroke onset to treatment was 130 vs. 140 vs. 135 mins, and females were 36·4% vs. 39·8% vs. 41·2%. Main outcomes (proportion of patients and 95% confidence intervals) were symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage: 1·9% (1·1–3·3) vs. 1·7% (1·4–2·0) vs. 3·1% (1·8–5·3); mortality: 10·2% (8·0–12·9) vs. 11·3% (10·5–12·1) vs. 16·4% (13·1–20·3); and functional independence: 62·5% (58·5–66·4) vs. 54·8% (53·5–56·0) vs. 50·1% (45·3–54·9) at three-months. Adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) between Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Non-European Union World and Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study, and between Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Non-European Union World and the pooled trials were 1·83 (0·89–3·77; P = 0·1156) and 0·63 (0·19–2·07; P = 0·4470) for symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, 0·90 (0·64–1·25; P = 0·5092) and 0·93 (0·52–1·64; P = 0·7915) for mortality at three-months, and 1·57 (1·25–1·96; P < 0·0001) and 1·35 (0·91–2·00; P = 0·1325) for functional independence.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the standard dose of intravenous alteplase (0·9 mg/kg) in an Asian population, as previously observed in the European population studied in Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study and the populations in pooled randomized controlled trials, when used in routine clinical practice within three-hours of stroke onset. The findings should encourage wider use of thrombolytic therapy in Asian countries for suitable patients treated in stroke centers.

Acute ischemic stroke: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose regimes of tissue plasminogen activator

Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-TPA), administered within 4.5 h of symptom onset, is the only therapeutic agent approved for achieving arterial recanalization in acute ischemic stroke. Current major guidelines recommend the use of a standard dose (0.9 mg/kg bodyweight; maximum 90 mg) of IV-TPA. However, comparable efficacy of IV-TPA was demonstrated in the observational studies from Japan when a lower dose (0.6 mg/kg bodyweight; maximum 60 mg) was used and later approved by the regulatory authorities. Although limited in numbers, considerable variations in the dose of IV-TPA are noted in recent publications from Asia, with variable results and optimal dose of TPA in Asia remains controversial. The authors present a systemic review of the existing literature and compare the efficacy and safety of standard-versus the low-dose IV-TPA therapy in acute ischemic stroke.

Risk adjustment of ischemic stroke outcomes for comparing hospital performance: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stroke is the fourth-leading cause of death and a leading cause of long-term major disability in the United States. Measuring outcomes after stroke has important policy implications. The primary goals of this consensus statement are to (1) review statistical considerations when evaluating models that define hospital performance in providing stroke care; (2) discuss the benefits, limitations, and potential unintended consequences of using various outcome measures when evaluating the quality of ischemic stroke care at the hospital level; (3) summarize the evidence on the role of specific clinical and administrative variables, including patient preferences, in risk-adjusted models of ischemic stroke outcomes; (4) provide recommendations on the minimum list of variables that should be included in risk adjustment of ischemic stroke outcomes for comparisons of quality at the hospital level; and (5) provide recommendations for further research.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This statement gives an overview of statistical considerations for the evaluation of hospital-level outcomes after stroke and provides a systematic review of the literature for the following outcome measures for ischemic stroke at 30 days: functional outcomes, mortality, and readmissions. Data on outcomes after stroke have primarily involved studies conducted at an individual patient level rather than a hospital level. On the basis of the available information, the following factors should be included in all hospital-level risk-adjustment models: age, sex, stroke severity, comorbid conditions, and vascular risk factors. Because stroke severity is the most important prognostic factor for individual patients and appears to be a significant predictor of hospital-level performance for 30-day mortality, inclusion of a stroke severity measure in risk-adjustment models for 30-day outcome measures is recommended. Risk-adjustment models that do not include stroke severity or other recommended variables must provide comparable classification of hospital performance as models that include these variables. Stroke severity and other variables that are included in risk-adjustment models should be standardized across sites, so that their reliability and accuracy are equivalent. There is a pressing need for research in multiple areas to better identify methods and metrics to evaluate outcomes of stroke care.

CONCLUSIONS

There are a number of important methodological challenges in undertaking risk-adjusted outcome comparisons to assess the quality of stroke care in different hospitals. It is important for stakeholders to recognize these challenges and for there to be a concerted approach to improving the methods for quality assessment and improvement.

Proteinuria independently predicts unfavorable outcome of ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis

Background and Purpose

Patients with low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria may be at increased risk for stroke. This study investigated whether low eGFR and proteinuria are outcome predictors in stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

Methods

We studied 432 consecutive stroke patients who received thrombolysis from January 2006 to December 2012, in Taiwan. Unfavorable outcome was defined as modified Rankin scale ≥2 at 3 months after stroke. Proteinuria was classified as negative or trace, mild, and moderate to severe. Using logistic regression analysis, we identified independent factors for unfavorable outcome after thrombolysis.

Results

Of all patients, 32.7% had proteinuria. Patients with proteinuria were older, had higher frequencies of diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, lower eGFR, and greater severity of stroke upon admission than those without proteinuria. Proteinuria, not low eGFR, was an independent predictor for unfavorable outcome for stroke (OR = 2.00 for mild proteinuria, p = 0.035; OR = 2.54 for moderate to severe proteinuria, p = 0.035). However, no clear relationship was found between proteinuria and symptomatic hemorrhage after thrombolysis.

Conclusions

Proteinuria is an independent predictor of unfavorable outcome for acute ischemic stroke in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis, indicating the crucial role of chronic kidney disease on the effectiveness of thrombolysis.

Low-dose tissue plasminogen activator and standard-dose tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke in Asian populations: a review

BACKGROUND

The burden of stroke is becoming an important issue in Asian countries, where half of the world's population lives. In Western populations, standard-dose intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) at a dose of 0.9 mg/kg administered up to 4.5 h following acute ischaemic stroke has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. However, the dosage of tPA in Asian populations varies, partly influenced by treatment costs in developing countries and the perceived racial differences in treatment response. Furthermore, no randomized controlled trial of intravenous tPA thrombolysis has been carried out in Asia with the exceptions of observational and multicentre registries in Japan. SUMMARY OF THE REVIEW: This review aims to examine the current use of low-dose tPA in Asian populations with particular emphasis on its clinical benefits. Historically, the findings of 2-chain tPA (duteplase) trials in the early 1990s were the basis of low-dose tPA in Japan, and standard-dose tPA was chosen taking into account a pilot dose escalation study. Most of the trials incorporating low-dose tPA suggested that low-dose tPA has clinical efficacy comparable with the standard dose and that it is associated with a lower incidence of symptomatic haemorrhage. It follows that consensus regarding the dosage of tPA is wanting.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard-dose tPA would be a reasonable choice in Asian populations until the results are available from randomized controlled studies comparing low-dose with standard-dose tPA.

Postthrombolysis Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients of Asian Race-Ethnicity

Background

Race-ethnic differences may influence postthrombolysis outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. Guidelines for thrombolytic therapy to treat Asian stroke patients are based mostly on extrapolated western data.

Aims

We undertook to examine outcomes among Asians by comparing a propensity-matched cohort of thrombolyzed patients from a tertiary center in Singapore with nonthrombolyzed Asian comparators collated from Virtual International Stroke Trials Archives (control).

Methods

We identified propensity scores-matched patients between thrombolyzed and control Asian patients lodged in the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archives by employing propensity scores method. We compared matched patients for their distributions of three-month functional (modified Rankin scores) and neurological outcomes (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) by employing Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test and proportional odds logistic regression analysis. We report odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for improved outcomes on day 90.

Results

Virtual International Stroke Trials Archives and National University Hospital, Singapore, contributed 517 and 133 patients of Asian race-ethnicity ( n = 650), respectively. After propensity matching, sample size reduced to 237 patients; 104 were from Virtual International Stroke Trials Archives. Age (59·7 vs. 61·5 years, P = 0·2) and mean baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores were similar ( 14 ) between thrombolyzed and control. The odds ratio for shift toward improved modified Rankin scores and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale distributions after tissue plasminogen activator therapy were 2·8 (95% confidence interval 1·8–4·5, P < 0·0001, n = 233; Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel P < 0·0001) and 2·8 (95% confidence interval 1·7–4·7, P = 0·0008, n = 201; Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel P = 0·0001).

Conclusions

Our data indicate that Asian patients derive benefit from thrombolytic therapy.

The chain of care enabling tPA treatment in acute ischemic stroke: a comprehensive review of organisational models

Protracted and partial implementation of treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) within 4.5 h after acute stroke onset results in potentially eligible patients not receiving optimal treatment. The goal of this study was to review the performance of various organisational models of acute stroke care delivery, and subsequent attempts to improve implementation of tPA treatment. Publications comprehensively reporting on organisational models to improve implementation of i.v. tPA treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients were selected. The efficacy of organisational models was assessed using process outcome measures: thrombolysis rates, time-dependent operational endpoints (time delays), functional outcomes: safety (rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, mortality rates) and clinical outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale). Fifty-eight published studies assessing organisational models were identified. Four dominant models of acute stroke care delivery were discerned, i.e., primary and comprehensive stroke centres, telemedicine, and the mobile stroke unit. Performance reported for these models suggest a large variation in administration of thrombolytic therapy (0.7-30 %). Time delays and functional outcomes found varied considerably, just like safety and mortality (0.0-11.5 %, and 3.4-31.9 %, respectively). These findings suggest that improving organisational models for tPA treatment may improve acute stroke care. However, implementation may be hampered by regional variation in acute stroke care capacity, expertise, and a fragmented approach towards organising stroke care.

Optimal dose for stroke thrombolysis in Asians: low dose may have similar safety and efficacy as standard dose

BACKGROUND

Although intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) at a standard dose of 0.9 mg kg(-1) is effective for patients with acute ischemic stroke, concerns have been raised regarding Asians.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and efficacy between low and standard doses for stroke thrombolysis.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Consecutive patients receiving t-PA treatment were recruited according to the prespecified dosing policy from two medical centers in Taiwan: low dose (0.7 mg kg(-1) ) at National Cheng Kung University Hospital (NCKUH) from August 2006 to June 2009, or standard dose (0.9 mg kg(-1) ) at NCKUH from July 2009 to December 2010 and at Changhua Christian Hospital from May 2008 to December 2010. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH). The secondary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) grade of ≤ 1 at 3 months.

RESULTS

From August 2006 to December 2010, 261 patients were recruited, of whom 105 and 156 received low and standard doses, respectively. The occurrence of SICH was non-significantly lower in the standard-dose group than in the low-dose group (2.6% vs. 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.34). The favorable outcome of mRS grade of ≤ 1 at 3 months was similar (38.4% and 41.1%, respectively; P = 0.676). A review of other case series of low vs. standard doses in Asians also showed similar safety and efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Our study, as well as other case series on Asians, revealed that standard-dose thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in an Asian population carries no increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage when compared with the low dose.

Comparison of bleeding and in-hospital mortality in Asian-Americans versus Caucasian-Americans with ST-elevation myocardial infarction receiving reperfusion therapy

Concern has been raised that Asian-Americans may have a higher bleeding risk than Caucasian-Americans when treated with fibrinolytic and antithrombotic agents. To date there is limited evidence to support or refute this hypothesis or evaluate bleeding risk and its related outcomes in Caucasian-Americans versus Asian-Americans with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PPCI). We evaluated Asian-Americans and Caucasian-Americans with STEMI receiving reperfusion therapy in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) 4 and 5 (n = 90,317). We studied risk-adjusted major bleeding and in-hospital mortality. Major bleeding rates after fibrinolysis were similar in Asian-Americans (n = 705) and Caucasian-Americans (n = 42,243, 11.1% vs 10.3%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69 to 1.36, p = 0.5002). Although the observed major bleeding rate was higher in Asian-Americans (n = 1,037) compared to Caucasian-Americans (n = 46,332) treated with PPCI (10.3% vs 7.8%, p = 0.0036), these rates differed only marginally after adjusting for baseline clinical variables (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.59). Overall adjusted mortality was similar in Asian-Americans and Caucasian-Americans when treated with fibrinolysis (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.65) or with PPCI (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.13). Major bleeding after PPCI or fibrinolysis was associated with similar increased risks for mortality in these ethic groups. In conclusion, despite suggestions to the contrary, Asian-Americans with STEMI treated with fibrinolysis or PPCI had similar bleeding and bleeding-related mortality risks compared to Caucasian-Americans. Given the genotypic and phenotypic differences between the 2 cohorts, similar studies in the rapidly growing Asian-American population are needed to confirm our findings and to understand the safety and effectiveness of newer potent antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents in patients with coronary syndromes.

Usefulness of CT angiography for therapeutic decision making in thrombolyzing intubated patients with suspected basilar artery thrombosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to basilar artery thrombosis (BAT) causes high mortality and severe disability. Early neurological assessment and timely thrombolysis might improve outcome. BAT is difficult to diagnose due to wide spectrum of presentation and decreased conscious level. Emergency physicians often intubate BAT patients with airway compromise before arrival of stroke neurologist. We evaluated role of computerized tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) of brain and cervical arteries in early diagnosis of acute BAT in intubated patients and facilitating decision for thrombolysis.

METHODS

Consecutive AIS patients presenting between 2007 and 2009 within 6 hours of symptom onset, with sudden deterioration in conscious level and intubation before assessment by neurologist, were included. All patients underwent brain CT and CTA. Outcomes were assessed at 3 months.

RESULTS

Thrombolytic therapy, mainly intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-TPA), was administered to 161 (8.4%) of 1,917 AIS patients during the study period. Acute BAT contributed 10.9% of our cohort. CTA was performed in 152 (94.4%) patients and the rest were excluded due to their impaired renal functions. Five patients (3 males, mean age 72 years) presenting with acute obtundation and airway compromise were intubated, sedated, and paralyzed before assessment by neurologist. CTA showed BAT in all. IV-TPA was initiated at 213 ± 59 minutes in 4 patients while 1 received intraarterial thrombolysis at 13 hours. There was no intracranial hemorrhage. Mean length of hospital stay was 11.8 days. Despite severe stroke at presentation, good functional recovery at 3 months (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 1) occurred in 2 patients; mRS 4 in 1, and 2 died.

CONCLUSION

In patients with BAT, intubated before assessment by neurologist, CTA might help in confirming the diagnosis and facilitating therapeutic decision making for initiating thrombolysis.

Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in Asia

Data regarding thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in Asia are scarce and only a small percentage of patients are thrombolysed. Clinical trials that led to the recommended dose of intravenously administered tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) included predominantly Caucasian patients. However, the single-arm case-controlled observational studies in Japanese patients suggested the clinical efficacy and safety of low-dose IV-tPA (0.6 mg/kg bodyweight; maximum 60 mg) comparable with standard dose (0.9 mg/kg bodyweight; maximum 90 mg). There has been no randomized clinical trial for determining the dose, efficacy or safety of IV-tPA in Asia. Accordingly, the dose of IV-tPA in Asia remains controversial. Reduced treatment cost, lower symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage risk and comparable efficacy encouraged many Asian centers to adopt low-dose or even variable-dose IV-tPA regimens. We present the current status of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in Asia.

Current Status of Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Asia

Background

Data regarding thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in Asia are scarce and only a small percentage of patients are thrombolysed. The dose of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) in Asia remains controversial. Case-controlled observation studies in Asia included only Japanese patients and suggested the clinical efficacy and safety of low-dose IV-tPA (0·6 mg/kg body weight; max 60 mg) comparable to standard dose (0·9 mg/kg body weight; max. 90 mg). Reduced treatment cost, lower symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage risk and comparable efficacy encouraged many Asian centers to adopt low-dose or even variable-dose IV-tPA regimens. We evaluated various Asian thrombolysis studies and compared with SITS-MOST registry and NINDS trial.

Methods

We included the published studies on acute ischemic stroke thrombolysis in Asia. Unadjusted relative risks and 95% Confidence intervals were calculated for each study. Pooled estimates from random effects models were used because the tests for heterogeneity were significant.

Results

We found only 18 publications regarding acute ischemic stroke thrombolysis in Asia that included total of 9300 patients. Owing to ethnic differences, stroke severity, small number of cases in individual reports, outcome measures and tPA dose regimes, it is difficult to compare these studies. Functional outcomes were almost similar (to Japanese studies) when lower-dose IV-tPA was used in non-Japanese populations across Asia. Interestingly, with standard dose IV-tPA, considerably better functional outcomes were observed, without increasing symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates.

Conclusions

Variable dose regimens of IV-tPA are used across Asia without any reliable or established evidence. Establishing a uniform IV-tPA regimen is essential since the rapid improvements in health-care facilities and public awareness are expected to increase the rates of thrombolysis in Asia.