The Relationship between Functional Outcome and Prehospital Time Interval in Patients with Cerebral Infarction

Value of plasma alpha- and beta-synuclein levels in the diagnosis, severity, and functional outcome of acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the role of plasma alpha- and beta-synuclein levels and other routine inflammatory parameters in the diagnosis, outcome, and mortality of acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

In our study, serum alpha- and beta-synuclein levels and clinical data were prospectively evaluated in 93 subjects (43 controls and 50 AIS patients) admitted to the emergency department. The outcome status and prognostic classification were performed according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores on the 30th day from hospital admission.

RESULTS

The mean age of the subjects was 70.6 ± 11 years. Thirty-eight percentage were female. Plasma α-synuclein levels in the AIS group (33.6 ± 8.5 ng/mL) were significantly higher than those in the control group (4.22 ± 2.1 ng/mL) (P < 0.001). Plasma β-synuclein levels in the AIS group (13.07 ± 2.7 ng/mL) were significantly higher than those in the control group (2.17 ± 1.4 ng/mL) (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in alpha- and beta-synuclein levels between the subgroups formed according to the 30th-day results of the patients using the mRS scores (P = 0.813 and 0.812, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The serum alpha- and beta-synuclein concentrations of patients with AIS at admission were significantly higher than the healthy control group. At admission, serum alpha- and beta-synuclein levels do not have definitive clinically predictive value in predicting stroke progression and outcome in patients with AIS.

Development of novel optical character recognition system to reduce recording time for vital signs and prescriptions: A simulation-based study

Digital advancements can reduce the burden of recording clinical information. This intra-subject experimental study compared the time and error rates for recording vital signs and prescriptions between an optical character reader (OCR) and manual typing. This study was conducted at three community hospitals and two fire departments in Japan. Thirty-eight volunteers (15 paramedics, 10 nurses, and 13 physicians) participated in the study. We prepared six sample pictures: three ambulance monitors for vital signs (normal, abnormal, and shock) and three pharmacy notebooks that provided prescriptions (two, four, or six medications). The participants recorded the data for each picture using an OCR or by manually typing on a smartphone. The outcomes were recording time and error rate defined as the number of characters with omissions or misrecognitions/misspellings of the total number of characters. Data were analyzed using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank sum and McNemar's tests. The recording times for vital signs were similar between groups (normal state, 21 s [interquartile range (IQR), 17-26 s] for OCR vs. 23 s [IQR, 18-31 s] for manual typing). In contrast, prescription recording was faster with the OCR (e.g., six-medication list, 18 s [IQR, 14-21 s] for OCR vs. 144 s [IQR, 112-187 s] for manual typing). The OCR had fewer errors than manual typing for both vital signs and prescriptions (0/1056 [0%] vs. 14/1056 [1.32%]; p<0.001 and 30/4814 [0.62%] vs. 53/4814 [1.10%], respectively). In conclusion, the developed OCR reduced the recording time for prescriptions but not vital signs. The OCR showed lower error rates than manual typing for both vital signs and prescription data.

Pre-Hospital Delay in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Multicenter Stroke Registry: K-PLUS

PURPOSE

There is scant data related to prehospital delay in cases of acute ischemic stroke from multicenter studies conducted after change of the therapeutic window of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (iv-tPA) administration to within 4.5 h of onset. We investigated factors causing prehospital delay and their associations with clinical outcomes using data from a regional multicenter stroke registry.

METHODS

Data from the multicenter regional stroke registry were analyzed. Patients admitted within 24 h of the last known well time were categorized according to whether their admission was early (≤ 4 h; n = 2350) or delayed (> 4 h; n = 2752). We then compared patients' backgrounds and outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

Five-thousand, one-hundred two patients presented at hospitals within 24 h of onset. On multivariate analysis, atrial fibrillation, higher NIHSS score on admission, anterior circulation stroke, detection of symptoms immediately after onset, and emergency system use were positively associated with early admission, whereas modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score before onset, onset at home, diabetes, current smoking, dementia and symptom detection between 00:00 and 06:00 h were negatively associated. Early admission was associated with mRS scores of 0-2 at discharge independent of backgrounds, stroke severity, and thrombolytic therapy (odds ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-1.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Certain patient factors relating to prehospital delay, such as lack of awareness of onset or non-cardioembolic etiology, are crucial but often inevitable. However, earlier admission was associated mRS scores of 0-2 independent of other factors. This study may help to plan educational activities to general population or public awareness campaigns.

[Sepsis detection in emergency medicine : Results of an interprofessional survey on sepsis detection in prehospital emergency medicine and emergency departments]

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is associated with a high mortality, which can be reduced by starting screening, diagnostics and treatment as early as possible. Due to multiple educational programs and increased awareness, a decreased sepsis mortality on intensive care units has been achieved. Many patients with sepsis are admitted by the prehospital emergency service to hospital emergency departments. Thus, prehospital emergency services and emergency departments provide an opportunity to start screening, diagnosis and treatment earlier.

OBJECTIVES

To detect sepsis it is paramount that emergency personnel are aware of the disease and have a profound knowledge regarding symptoms, screening and diagnostics. The objective of this survey was to examine the state of knowledge regarding sepsis among staff working in emergency medicine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To assess the awareness and knowledge, a paper-based, anonymous survey was conducted among prehospital and emergency department personnel from May to August 2017 in northeastern Germany. Testing of significance was carried out using the χ²-testand Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Out of 411 persons polled 212 answered (response rate 51.6%) and 24 questionnaires were incomplete and thus excluded. A total of 188 questionnaires were included covering 55 emergency physicians, 23 nurses, 82 paramedics and 19 emergency dispatchers. On a 4-point Likert scale 100% of emergency doctors, 96% of nurses, 84% of paramedics and 84% of emergency dispatchers considered early initiation of sepsis treatment to be important. Additionally, 92% of emergency physicians and 65% of nurses had attended educational programs on sepsis within the last year, which is significantly higher than among paramedics (19%, p < 0.01) and emergency dispatchers (21%, p = 0.025). In addition, 38% of paramedics and 47% of emergency dispatchers had never attended lectures on sepsis. The quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) was known by 80% of emergency doctors, thus, significantly more often than by nurses (26%), paramedics (29%) and emergency dispatchers (29%, p < 0.01). The emergency personnel were asked to tick all symptoms they associated with sepsis from a display of 14 symptoms. Among all occupation groups the majority selected "increased body temperature", "drop in blood pressure" and "altered breathing". In relation to "increased body temperature" the symptom "altered mental status" was selected significantly more frequently by emergency doctors than by nurses and paramedics (p = 0.02 and p < 0.01, respectively). The combination of at least all 3 qSOFA parameters was selected significantly more often by emergency doctors (62%) than by nurses (13%) and paramedics (10%, p = 0.017 and p < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although emergency personnel rated an early initiation of sepsis treatment as important, sepsis knowledge was limited. While the majority of emergency doctors and many nurses had attended educational programs on sepsis within the last year, an alarmingly high percentage of paramedics and emergency dispatchers had never received sepsis education. Emergency personnel are mostly unfamiliar with the qSOFA score and did not associate an altered mental status with sepsis. In light of the high sepsis morbidity and mortality, further achievements might be made by initiating sepsis screening and diagnostics in the prehospital setting. Analogous to advancements in intensive care units, increased educational programs for emergency personnel might lead to an earlier detection and improved prognosis of sepsis.