Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke on Nights and Weekends Versus Weekdays at Comprehensive Stroke Centers

Outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke associated with large vessel occlusion admitted during regular and off-hours: a sub-analysis of the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2

BACKGROUND

Off-hour admissions can adversely affect clinical outcomes, though evidence in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) associated with large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains limited. This study aimed to examine the impact of off-hour versus regular-hour admissions on outcomes in patients with AIS associated with LVO.

METHODS

Data from the Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism (RESCUE)-Japan Registry 2, a prospective multicenter registry of patients with AIS associated with LVO were used. Eligible patients were aged ≥20 years and admitted within 24 hours of stroke onset. Off-hour admissions were defined as those occurring between 17:00 and 09:00 on weekdays and at all times on holidays, reflecting typical periods of reduced healthcare staffing. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2, assessed 90 days post-admission.

RESULTS

Of the 2390 patients, 1794 (71.7%) and 676 (28.3%) were admitted during off-hours and regular hours, respectively. Intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator was administered to 617 (36.0%) off-hour patients and 336 (49.7%) regular-hour patients (P<0.0001). Endovascular therapy was provided to 915 (53.4%) off-hour patients and 361 (53.4%) regular-hour patients (P=0.99). Favorable outcomes (mRS score 0-2) were observed in 604 (35.2%) off-hour patients and 272 (40.2%) regular-hour patients (P=0.02). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference in the primary outcome between groups (adjusted OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.35; P=0.56).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that off-hour and regular-hour admissions have similar clinical outcomes in patients with AIS associated with LVO in this Japanese cohort.

Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke performed without continuous saline flushes and using moderate sedation: The TOOFAST technique

BACKGROUND

Rapid reperfusion is an important predictor of neurologic recovery in acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We present a single-institution retrospective observational study of the ThrOmbectomy withOut Flushes or AnestheSia Teams (TOOFAST) technique, which eliminates continuous heparinized saline flushes and employs conscious sedation (CS) to streamline MT preparation.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data for AIS-LVO patients at our comprehensive stroke center from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2023. Patients were >18 years with premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) <3. Cases were performed under CS without continuous pressurized heparinized saline flushes or anesthesiologist involvement. Cases were categorized as presenting to the emergency department or from inpatient units (in-house), outside hospital transfers, or those undergoing hyperacute MRI.

RESULTS

Among 947 total cases, 638 were analyzed. 374 (58.6%) were in-house activations, 205 (32.1%) were transfers, and 59 (9.2%) underwent hyperacute MRI. Median presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 15 (interquartile range (IQR) 9-20) and 34.7% of patients received intravenous thrombolysis. Median arrival-to-access and NIR-to-access times for in-house activations were 67 (IQR 56-80) and 39 (IQR 29-48) minutes, respectively. Embolization to new territory occurred in 11 (1.7%) patients while vascular perforation occurred in 9 (1.4%). Median NIHSS shift from admission to discharge was -9 (IQR -15 to -5). At 90 days, 46.5% (106/228) remained mRS <3.

CONCLUSIONS

The TOOFAST technique may result in rapid access times with a profile of safety, procedural parameters, and neurologic outcomes comparable to published trial standards.

Delayed door to puncture time during off-duty hours is associated with unfavorable outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy in the early window of acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUNDS

The impact of off-duty hours mechanical thrombectomy on outcomes remains a subject of controversy. The impacts of off-duty hours on procedures are influenced by various factors, but the most critical one is the time delay in initiating the procedure after the patient's arrival at the emergency room. Recently, a report suggested that the impact of time delay on post-procedural outcomes is evident in patients who arrive at the emergency room within 6 h of symptom onset, referred to as the "early window." We hypothesized that the impact of procedure delays on outcomes during off duty-hours would be most significant within this early window. This study aimed to investigate the impact of door-to-puncture time (DTPT) delays in patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) during off-duty hours in both the early and late time windows.

METHODS

We investigated patients who presented to the emergency center between 2014 and 2022. Among a total of 6,496 AIS patients, we selected those who underwent mechanical thrombectomy within 24 h of the onset of acute anterior circulation occlusion. The eligible patients were divided into two groups: those who arrived within 6 h of symptom onset and received the procedure within 8 h (early window), and those who received the procedure between 8 h and 24 h after symptom onset (late window). The study assessed the association between the onset to puncture time in each group and poor outcomes, measured by the modified Rankin scores(mRs) at 90 days. Furthermore, the study analyzed the impact of receiving the procedure during off-hours in both the early and late windows on outcomes. Specifically, the analysis focused on the impact of delayed DTPT in patients during off-duty hours on outcomes measured by the 90-days mRS.

RESULTS

Among the eligible patients, a total of 501 AIS patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy for acute anterior circulation occlusion within 24 h. Of these, 395 patients (78.8%) fell into the early window category, and 320 patients (63.9%) underwent the procedure during off-duty hours. In the early window, for every 60-minute increase in OTPT, the probability of occurrence a poor outcome at 90 days significantly increased in the fully adjusted model (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.43; p = 0.03). In the early window, delayed procedures during off-duty hours (exceeding 103 min of DTPT) were identified as an independent predictor of poor outcomes (OR = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.05 to 3.24; p = 0.03). However, in the late window, there was no association between DTPT and outcomes at 90 days, and the impact of DTPT delays during off-hours was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Through this study, it became evident that the impacts of off-duty hours in mechanical thrombectomy were most pronounced in the early window, where the impact of time delay was clear. Therefore, it is believed that improvements in the treatment system are necessary to address this issue.

Effect of working hours on prognosis of acute ischemic stroke patients following alteplase intravenous thrombolysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of hospital working hours on outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke 3 months after receiving alteplase intravenous thrombolysis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 254 individuals with acute ischemic stroke who received alteplase intravenous thrombolysis between January 2018 and December 2020 either during peak hospital working hours (08:00-17:59; Group A) or off-peak hours (18:00-07:59 the following day; Group B). Patients were also categorized according to which of four peak/off-peak-hour periods they received treatment in: Group 1 (08:00-11:59), Group 2 (12:00-17:59), Group 3 (18:00-21:59), Group 4 (22:00-07:59 the following day). Baseline data and 3-month prognosis were compared across groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the correlation between hospital working hours and 3-month prognosis.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in door-to-needle time, onset-to-needle time, 24-hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, 7-day NIHSS score or Modified Rankin Score between Groups 1 to 4 or between Groups A and B. Whether treatment was administered during peak or off-peak hours did not significantly affect 3-month prognosis.

CONCLUSION

At this hospital, differences in the time at which stroke patients were treated were not associated with outcomes.

Endovascular treatment for basilar artery occlusion: whether the "weekend effect" affects time metrics and clinical outcomes at a comprehensive stroke center

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate whether the "weekend effect" would affect the time metrics and the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who underwent endovascular treatment (EVT) due to basilar artery occlusion (BAO).

Methods

Clinical data of AIS patients who underwent EVT due to BAO between December 2019 and July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. At the time when the patients were admitted, the study population was divided into the weekdays daytime group and weekends nighttime group. In the subgroup analysis, the study cohort was divided into four groups: the weekdays daytime group, weekdays nighttime group, weekend daytime group, and weekend nighttime group. A good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of ≤3 at 90 days after EVT. Time metrics [e.g. onset-to-door time (ODT) and door-to-puncture time (DPT)] and clinical outcomes were compared using appropriate statistical methods.

Results

A total of 111 patients (88 male patients, mean age, 67.7 ± 11.7 years) were included. Of these, 37 patients were treated during weekdays daytime, while 74 patients were treated during nights or weekends. There were no statistically significant differences in ODT (P = 0.136), DPT (P = 0.931), and also clinical outcomes (P = 0.826) between the two groups. Similarly, we found no significant differences in the time metrics and clinical outcomes among the four sub-groups (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

This study did not reveal any influence of the "weekend effect" on the time metrics and clinical outcomes in AIS patients who underwent EVT due to BAO at a comprehensive stroke center.

Endovascular stroke therapy outside core working hours in a nationwide stroke system

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy (EVT) has been established as a major component in the acute treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke. However, it is unclear whether outcome and other treatment-related factors differ if patients are treated within or outside core working hours.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the prospective nationwide Austrian Stroke Unit Registry capturing all consecutive stroke patients treated with EVT between 2016 and 2020. Patients were trichotomized according to the time of groin puncture into treatment within regular working hours (08:00-13:59), afternoon/evening (14:00-21:59) and night-time (22:00-07:59). Additionally, we analyzed 12 EVT treatment windows with equal patient numbers. Main outcome variables included favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2) 3 months post-stroke as well as procedural time metrics, recanalization status and complications.

RESULTS

We analyzed 2916 patients (median age 74 years, 50.7% female) who underwent EVT. Patients treated within core working hours more frequently had a favorable outcome (42.6% vs 36.1% treated in the afternoon/evening vs 35.8% treated at night-time; p=0.007). Similar results were found when analyzing 12 treatment windows. All these differences remained significant in multivariable analysis adjusting for outcome-relevant co-factors. Onset-to-recanalization time was considerably longer outside core working hours, which was mainly explained by longer door-to-groin time (p<0.001). There was no difference in the number of passes, recanalization status, groin-to-recanalization time and EVT-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of delayed intrahospital EVT workflows and worse functional outcomes outside core working hours in this nationwide registry are relevant for optimization of stroke care, and might be applicable to other countries with similar settings.

Differences in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke on weekdays versus nights/ weekends in a Japanese primary stroke core center

OBJECTIVE

The term "weekend effect" refers to an increase in the mortality rate for hospitalizations occurring on weekends versus weekdays. In this study, we investigated whether such an effect exists in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (currently the standard treatment for this condition) at a single center in Japan.

METHODS

We surveyed 151 patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (75 and 76 patients were treated during daytime and nighttime, respectively) from January 2019 to June 2021. The items evaluated in this analysis were the rate of modified Rankin Scale ≤2 or prestroke scale, mortality, and procedural treatment time.

RESULTS

The rates of modified Rankin Scale ≤2 or prestroke scale and mortality at 90 days after treatment did not differ significantly between daytime and nighttime (41.3% vs. 29.0%, p=0.11; 14.7% vs. 11.8%, p=0.61, respectively). The door-to-groin time tended to be shorter during daytime versus nighttime (57 [IQR: 42.5-70] min vs. 70 [IQR: 55-82]) min, p=0.0507).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not reveal differences in treatment outcome between daytime and nighttime in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Therefore, the "weekend effect" was not observed in our institution.

Patterns and outcomes of weekend admission for acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The "weekend effect" describes worse care delivery during off-hours or weekends and has been demonstrated in multiple sub-specialties. Off-hours care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been associated with poorer outcomes. However, there is less data about the "weekend effect" on endovascular thrombectomy (ET) outcomes.

METHODS

We used Medicare 100% sample datasets and included all AIS admissions from 2018-2019, using validated International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify AIS and comorbidities. Medicare provides the date of admission for all hospitalizations, and the day of the week was determined and assigned to weekend (Saturday or Sunday) or weekday (Monday through Friday). We defined 3 major outcomes: inpatient mortality, discharge home (vs. other destination), and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Among 471427 AIS admissions,13.0% and 12.9% of all AIS admissions occurred on a Saturday and Sunday, respectively, less than the expected 14.3% occurring on any given day (p-value <0.0001). AIS admissions on a weekend were less likely to receive IV thrombolysis (13.6% on Saturday and 12.9% on Sunday) and ET (13.1% on Saturday and 13.2% on Sunday), p-value <0.0001. Among all AIS admissions, weekend admission was associated with worse outcomes, including higher odds of inpatient mortality (adjusted OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.01-1.08, p<0.0001]), lower odds of discharge home (0.94 [0.93-0.96, p<0.0001]), and higher odds of 30-day mortality (1.06 [1.04-1.08, p<0.0001]). However, among AIS patients treated with ET, there was no association of weekend admission with outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national and contemporary dataset, we observed that the proportion of thrombolysis and ET cases was less over the weekend, and outcomes (inpatient mortality, 30-day mortality and odds of discharge home) were worse overall. We did not observe this association among AIS patients undergoing ET on a weekend vs. weekday.

Does Weekends Effect Exist in Asia? Analysis of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in A Medical Center

BACKGROUND

Discussing the quality measurements based on interrupted time series in ischemic stroke, delays are often attributed to weekends effect. This study compared the metrics and outcomes of emergent endovascular thrombectomy (EST) during working hours versus non-working hours in the emergency department of an Asian medical center.

METHODS

A total of 297 patients who underwent EST between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively included, with 52.5% of patients presenting during working hours and 47.5% presenting during nights, weekends, or holidays.

RESULTS

Patients with diabetes were more in non-working hours than in working hours (53.9% vs. 41.0%; p=0.026). It took longer during nonworking hours than working hours in door-to -image times (13 min vs. 12 min; p=0.04) and door-to-groin puncture times (median: 112 min vs. 104 min; p=0.042). Significant statistical differences were not observed between the two groups in neurological outcomes, including successful reperfusion and complications such as intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. However, the change in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores in 24 hours was better in the working-hour group than in the nonworking-hour group (4 vs. 2; p=0.058).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that nonworking-hour effects truly exist in patients who received EST. Although delays in door-to-groin puncture times were noticed during nonworking hours, significant differences in neurological functions and mortality were not observed between working and non-working hours. Nevertheless, methods to improve the process during non-working hours should be explored in the future.

Team Prenotification Reduces Procedure Times for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion Who Are Transferred for Endovascular Therapy

Background: The clinical benefit from endovascular therapy (EVT) for patients with acute ischemic stroke is time-dependent. We tested the hypothesis that team prenotification results in faster procedure times prior to initiation of EVT.

Methods: We analyzed data from our prospective database (01/2016–02/2018) including all patients with acute ischemic stroke who were evaluated for EVT at our comprehensive stroke center. We established a standardized algorithm (EVT-Call) in 06/2017 to prenotify team members (interventional neuroradiologist, neurologist, anesthesiologist, CT and angiography technicians) about patient transfer from remote hospitals for evaluation of EVT, and team members were present in the emergency department at the expected patient arrival time. We calculated door-to-image, image-to-groin and door-to-groin times for patients who were transferred to our center for evaluation of EVT, and analyzed changes before (–EVT-Call) and after (+EVT-Call) implementation of the EVT-Call.

Results: Among 494 patients in our database, 328 patients were transferred from remote hospitals for evaluation of EVT (208 -EVT-Call and 120 +EVT-Call, median [IQR] age 75 years [65–81], NIHSS score 17 [12–22], 49.1% female). Of these, 177 patients (54%) underwent EVT after repeated imaging at our center (111/208 [53%) -EVT-Call, 66/120 [55%] +EVT-Call). Median (IQR) door-to-image time (18 min [14–22] vs. 10 min [7–13]; p < 0.001), image-to-groin time (54 min [43.5–69.25] vs. 47 min [38.3–58.75]; p = 0.042) and door-to-groin time (74 min [58–86.5] vs. 60 min [49.3–71]; p < 0.001) were reduced after implementation of the EVT-Call.

Conclusions: Team prenotification results in faster patient assessment and initiation of EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Its impact on functional outcome needs to be determined.

Workflow Intervals and Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On-Vs. Off-hours in China: The ANGEL-ACT Registry

Background: There may be a delay in or a poor outcome of endovascular treatment (EVT) among acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) during off-hours. By using a prospective, nationwide registry, we compared the workflow intervals and radiological/clinical outcomes between patients with acute LVO treated with EVT presenting during off- and on-hours.

Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke (ANGEL-ACT) data. Patients presenting during off-hours were defined as those presenting to the emergency department from Monday to Friday between 17:30 and 08:00, on weekends (from 17:30 on Friday to 08:00 on Monday), and on national holidays. We used logistic regression models with adjustment for potential confounders to determine independent associations between the time of presentation and outcomes.

Results: Among 1,788 patients, 1,079 (60.3%) presented during off-hours. The median onset-to-door time and onset-to-reperfusion time were significantly longer during off-hours than during on-hours (165 vs. 125 min, P = 0.002 and 410 vs. 392 min, P = 0.027). The rates of successful reperfusion and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were similar in both groups. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score was 0.892 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.748–1.064]. The adjusted OR for the occurrence of functional independence was 0.892 (95% CI, 0.724–1.098), and the adjusted OR for mortality was 1.214 (95% CI, 0.919–1.603).

Conclusions: Off-hours presentation in the nationwide real-world registry was associated with a delay in the visit and reperfusion time of EVT in patients with AIS. However, this delay was not associated with worse functional outcomes or higher mortality rates.

Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03370939.

Investigating the "Weekend Effect" on Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVES

With growing evidence of its efficacy for patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke, the use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has increased. The "weekend effect," whereby patients presenting during weekends/off hours have worse clinical outcomes than those presenting during normal working hours, is a critical area of study in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Our objective was to evaluate whether a "weekend effect" exists in patients undergoing EVT.

METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the 2016-2018 Nationwide Inpatient Sample data included patients ≥18 years with documented diagnosis of ischemic stroke (ICD-10 codes I63, I64, and H34.1), procedural code for EVT, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score; the exposure variable was weekend vs. weekday treatment. The primary outcome was in-hospital death; secondary outcomes were favorable discharge, extended hospital stay (LOS), and cost. Logistic regression models were constructed to determine predictors for outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 6052 AIS patients who received EVT (mean age 68.7±14.8 years; 50.8% female; 70.8% White; median (IQR) admission NIHSS 16 (10-21). The primary outcome of in-hospital death occurred in 560 (11.1%); the secondary outcome of favorable discharge occurred in 1039 (20.6%). The mean LOS was 7.8±8.6 days. There were no significant differences in the outcomes or cost based on admission timing. In the mixed-effects models, we found no effect of weekend vs. weekday admission on in-hospital death, favorable discharge, or extended LOS.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that the "weekend effect" does not impact outcomes or cost for patients who undergo EVT for LVO.

Off-hour effect is not significant in endovascular treatment for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in a multicentre registry

Background and purpose

Whether the off-hour effect has an impact on workflow and outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (AC-LVO) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who presented or were treated during off-hour versus on-hour in a multi-center registry.

Methods

AC-LVO patients from 21 centres were categorised into the off-hour group and the on-hour group. Off-hour (weekends, holidays, and 18:00–7:59 on weekdays) and on-hour (8:00–17:59 on weekdays except for holidays) were defined according to arrival and groin-puncture time points, respectively. Subgroup comparisons between patients both arrived and treated during off-hour (true off-hour) and on-hour (true on-hour) were performed. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary outcomes included favourable outcome (mRS 0–2 at 90 days), EVT-related time metrics, and other clinical outcomes. Ordinary and binary logistic regression and linear regression were taken to adjust for confounding factors.

Results

Of all 698 patients enrolled, 435 (62.3%) and 456 (65.3%) patients were categorised into the off-hour arrival and off-hour puncture group, respectively. Shorter onset to door time (adjusted ß coefficient: −21.56; 95% CI −39.96 to −3.16; p=0.022) was noted in the off-hour arrival group. Ordinal and dichotomous mRS scores at 90 days were comparable between the off-hour group and the on-hour group regardless of off-hour definitions. Other time metrics and outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Of 595 patients both presented and were treated during off-hour or on-hour, 394 patients were categorised into the true off-hour group and 201 into the true on-hour group. Time metrics and clinical outcomes were similar between the true off-hour and the true on-hour group.

Conclusions

The off-hour effect was not significant regarding clinical outcomes and in-hospital workflow in AC-LVO patients receiving EVT in this Chinese multicentre registry.

Off-hour effect on time metrics and clinical outcomes in endovascular treatment for large vessel occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing debate on the off-hour effect on endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO).

AIM

This meta-analysis aimed to compare time metrics and clinical outcomes of acute LVO patients who presented/were treated during off-hour with those during working hours.

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

Structured searches on the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted through 23 February 2021. The primary outcomes were onset to door (OTD), door to imaging, door to puncture (DTP), puncture to recanalization, procedural time, successful recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), mortality in hospital, good prognosis (90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2), and 90-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were imaging to puncture (ITP), onset to puncture (OTP), onset to recanalization (OTR), door to recanalization (DTR) time, mRS 0-2 at discharge, and consecutive 90-day mRS score. The odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of the outcomes were calculated using random-effect models. Heterogenicity and publication bias were analyzed. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted as appropriate. Nineteen studies published between 2014 and 2021 with a total of 14,185 patients were eligible for quantitative synthesis. Patients in the off-hour group were significantly younger than those in the on-hour group and with comparable stroke severity and intravenous thrombolysis rate. The off-hour group had longer OTD (WMD [95% CI], 12.83 [1.84-23.82] min), DTP (WMD [95% CI], 11.45 [5.93-16.97] min), ITP (WMD [95% CI], 10.39 [4.61-16.17] min), OTP (WMD [95% CI], 25.30 [13.11-37.50] min), OTR (WMD [95% CI], 25.16 [10.28-40.04] min), and DTR (WMD [95% CI], 18.02 [10.01-26.03] min) time. Significantly lower successful recanalization rate (OR [95% CI], 0.85 [0.76-0.95]; p = 0.004; I²= 0%) was detected in the off-hour group. No significant difference was noted regarding SICH and prognosis. But a trend toward lower OR of good prognosis was witnessed in the off-hour group (OR [95% CI], 0.92 [0.84-1.01]; p = 0.084; I²= 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who presented/were treated during off-hour were associated with excessive delays before the initiation of EVT, lower successful reperfusion rate, and a trend toward worse prognosis when compared with working hours. Optimizing the workflows of EVT during off-hour is needed.