Statins for the Prevention of Post-Stroke Seizure and Epilepsy Development: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The double-edged sword of statins in intracerebral hemorrhage patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of statins on the prognosis of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

Methods

We conducted a systematic search using the keywords "statin" and "intracerebral hemorrhage" across four electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase) from their inception to October 31, 2023, to identify studies comparing the effects of statins on the prognosis of patients with ICH. The primary outcome was total mortality after ICH. This meta-analysis was registered online (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023493063).

Results

Our initial search identified 5,543 studies. After applying inclusion criteria, 30 studies with a total of 42,298 patients were included in the final analysis. Our meta-analysis showed that statins significantly reduced overall mortality in patients with ICH (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.51-0.73; I 2 = 87%; p < 0.01). Subgroup analyses further demonstrated lower mortality in ICH patients treated with statins compared to those not treated, including in the propensity score matching (PSM) group (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.48-0.74; I 2 = 90%; p < 0.01), the prospective cohort study (PCS) group (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.77; I 2 = 89%, p < 0.01), and the retrospective cohort study (RCS) group (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51-0.81; I 2 = 87%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis of 30 studies suggests that statin use may be associated with improved mortality and functional outcomes in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42023493063.

Rosuvastatin accelerates the healing process of partial-thickness burn wounds in rats by reducing TNF-α levels

Introduction

Burn wound healing is a complex, dynamic process that involves a coordinated cascade of cellular responses and phases. Inflammation, proliferation and remodeling are the main phases of tissue repair, while tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and procalcitonin (PCT) seem to be important mediators affecting the inflammatory state. Our aim was to assess the effect of rosuvastatin on tissue repair after partial thickness burn injury in healthy animals.

Material and methods

In this randomized prospective experimental study, 36 male rats were randomly divided into two groups: placebo-treated (PG) and topical rosuvastatin-treated (SG). Under anesthesia, a partial-thickness burn trauma was induced in the dorsal region of the rats using an iron seal. Tissue samples were collected for histopathological examination as well.

Results

Variables of TNF-α, procalcitonin and macroscopic assessment were normally distributed between the two groups on all studied days. The expression of TNF-α was found to be lower in burn injuries treated with topical rosuvastatin in comparison with placebo-treated animals on days 3, 6 and 9. PCT values in rosuvastatin-treated subgroups were statistically significantly lower than in placebo subgroups. Upon macroscopic examination, a significantly smaller burnt area in the statin-treated group was detected compared to the non-statin group on all days, except for day 3. Histopathological examination demonstrated higher levels of mean neutrophil infiltration in the placebo group (day 3). Finally, fibroblast proliferation, angiogenesis and re-epithelization levels were noted to be higher after the topical application of rosuvastatin.

Conclusions

Rosuvastatin accelerated wound healing and down-regulated TNF-α and PCT levels.

Role of blood-brain barrier dysfunction in the development of poststroke epilepsy

Stroke is a major contributor to mortality and morbidity worldwide and the most common cause of epilepsy in the elderly in high income nations. In recent years, it has become increasingly evident that both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes induce dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and that this impairment can contribute to epileptogenesis. Nevertheless, studies directly comparing BBB dysfunction and poststroke epilepsy (PSE) are largely absent. Therefore, this review summarizes the role of BBB dysfunction in the development of PSE in animal models and clinical studies. There are multiple mechanisms whereby stroke induces BBB dysfunction, including increased transcytosis, tight junction dysfunction, spreading depolarizations, astrocyte and pericyte loss, reactive astrocytosis, angiogenesis, matrix metalloproteinase activation, neuroinflammation, adenosine triphosphate depletion, oxidative stress, and finally cell death. The degree to which these effects occur is dependent on the severity of the ischemia, whereby cell death is a more prominent mechanism of BBB disruption in regions of critical ischemia. BBB dysfunction can contribute to epileptogenesis by increasing the risk of hemorrhagic transformation, increasing stroke size and the amount of cerebral vasogenic edema, extravasation of excitatory compounds, and increasing neuroinflammation. Furthermore, albumin extravasation after BBB dysfunction contributes to epileptogenesis primarily via increased transforming growth factor β signaling. Finally, seizures themselves induce BBB dysfunction, thereby contributing to epileptogenesis in a cyclical manner. In repairing this BBB dysfunction, pericyte migration via platelet-derived growth factor β signaling is indispensable and required for reconstruction of the BBB, whereby astrocytes also play a role. Although animal stroke models have their limitations, they provide valuable insights into the development of potential therapeutics designed to restore the BBB after stroke, with the ultimate goal of improving outcomes and minimizing the occurrence of PSE. In pursuit of this goal, rapamycin, statins, losartan, semaglutide, and metformin show promise, whereby modulation of pericyte migration could also be beneficial.

Association between statin use during hospitalisation and mortality in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage: a propensity score-matched cohort study

OBJECTIVES

We examined the relationship between statin use during hospitalisation and mortality in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH).

DESIGN

Retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.

SETTING

Patients with ICH (≥18 years old) admitted to Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) from 2001 to 2012 registered in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database.

PARTICIPANTS

1043 patients with ICH (≥18 years) were evaluated for the relationship between statin use during hospitalisation and mortality.

INTERVENTIONS

Statin use.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. We used multivariable Cox regression analyses to calculate the adjusted HR with 95% CI and used propensity score analysis and an inverse probability weighting (IPW) model to ensure the robustness of our findings.

RESULTS

We included 1043 patients with ICH (362 and 681 were statins and non-statin users, respectively) between 2001 and 2012. The overall 90-day mortality was 29.8% (311/1043); it was 33.3% (227/681) and 23.2% (84/362) for non-statin and statin users, respectively. After adjusted for potential confounders, we found that statin use was associated with 29% lower of 90-day mortality (HR=0.71, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.97, p<0.05). IPW also demonstrated a significantly lower 90-day mortality in statin users. The HR was 0.69 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.88, p<0.01). The results remain stable in subgroup analyses and propensity score matching.

CONCLUSION

Statin use during hospitalisation may be associated with reduced risk-adjusted mortality in patients with ICH. Further randomised controlled trials are needed to clarify this association.

Statins as antiepileptogenic drugs: analysing the evidence and identifying the most promising statin

Many brain insults and injuries are “epileptogenic”: they increase the risk of developing epilepsy. It is desirable to identify treatments that are “antiepileptogenic”: treatments that prevent the development of epilepsy, if administered after the occurrence of an epileptogenic insult. Current antiepileptic drugs are not antiepileptogenic, but evidence of antiepileptogenic efficacy is accumulating for a growing number of other compounds. From among these candidate compounds, statins are deserving of particular attention because statins are reported to be antiepileptogenic in more published studies and in a wider range of brain insults than any other individual or class of compounds. Although many studies report the antiepileptogenic effect of statins, it is unclear how many studies provide evidence that statins exhibit the following two essential features of a clinically viable antiepileptogenic drug: the drug must exert an antiepileptogenic effect even if it is initiated after the epileptogenic brain insult has already occurred, and the antiepileptogenic effect must endure even after the drug has been discontinued. In the current work, we interrogate published preclinical and clinical studies, to determine if statins fulfill these essential requirements. There are eight different statins in clinical use. To enable the clinical use of one of these statins for antiepileptogenesis, its antiepileptogenic effect will have to be established through future time‐ and resource‐intensive clinical trials. Therefore, it is desirable to review the published literature to determine which of the statins emerges as the most promising candidate for antiepileptogenic therapy. Hence, in the current work, we also collate and analyze published data—clinical and pre‐clinical, direct and indirect—that help to answer the question: Which statin is the most promising candidate to take forward into an antiepileptogenesis clinical trial?