How Effective are New Milestones Assessments at Demonstrating Resident Growth? 1 Year of Data

Do You See What I See? A Comparison of CCC and Self-Assigned Milestones Across Military Medical Specialties

BACKGROUND

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires residency programs to complete competency-based assessments of medical trainees based on nationally established Milestones. Previous research demonstrates a strong correlation between CCC and resident scores on the Milestones in surgery, but little is known if this is true between specialties. In this study, we investigated a variety of specialties and sought to determine what factors affect self-assessment of milestones. In addition, a post-hoc analysis was completed on the COVID-19 pandemic effects on self-evaluation.

METHODS

This is an IRB approved observational study on prospectively collected self-evaluation milestone data that is used within each ACGME program's Clinical Competency Committees. Medical trainees within the San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium were approached for possible participation in this study with permission from program directors.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between self-assessments and CCC-assessments based on self-identified gender or residency type (surgical versus nonsurgical) for any milestone domain. Within the postgraduate year (PGY) groups, the PGY5 and PGY6 tended to rate themselves higher than CCC. Chiefs (Internal Medicine PGY2/3, and General Surgery PGY5/6) tended to be more accurate in scoring themselves than the interns (PGY1) within the milestone of Interpersonal Skills and Communication (chiefs 0.5 vs. interns 0.62, p = 0.03). On post hoc analysis of self-rating, during the first wave of the COVID 19 pandemic, Post-Covid residents were more likely to underrate themselves in Systems-Based Practice compared to the Pre-Covid cohort (-0.49 vs 0.10; p = 0.007) and more likely to rate themselves higher in Professionalism (-0.54 vs. -0.10, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Unique to this study and our institution, there was no gender difference found in self vs CCC evaluations. With the change in learning environment from COVID, there was also a change in ability for some learners to self-assess accurately. As medical educators, we should understand the importance of both encouraging learners to practice self-assessment as well as give feedback to trainees on their progress. We also need to educate our faculty on the use of milestones for assessment to create a true gold standard in the CCC.

Assessing the impact of adopting a competency-based medical education framework and ACGME-I accreditation on educational outcomes in a family medicine residency program in Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates

Background

Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) is now mandated by many graduate and undergraduate accreditation standards. Evaluating CBME is essential for quantifying its impact, finding supporting evidence for the efforts invested in accreditation processes, and determining future steps. The Ambulatory Healthcare Services (AHS) family medicine residency program has been accredited by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-International (ACGME-I) since 2013. This study aims to report the Abu Dhabi program's experience in implementing CBME and accreditation.

Objectives

Compare the two residents' cohorts' performance pre-and post-ACGME-I accreditation.Study the bi-annually reported milestones as a graduating residents' performance prognostic tool.

Methods

All residents in the program from 2008 to 2019 were included. They are called Cohort one-the intake from 2008 to 2012, before the ACGME accreditation, and Cohort two-the intake from 2013 to 2019, after the ACGME accreditation, with the milestones used. The mandatory annual in-training exam was used as an indication of the change in competency between the two cohorts. Among Cohort two ACGME-I, the biannual milestones data were studied to find the correlation between residents' early and graduating milestones.

Results

A total of 112 residents were included: 36 in Cohort one and 76 in Cohort two. In Cohort one, before the ACGME accreditation, no significant associations were identified between residents' graduation in-training exam and their early performance indicators, while in Cohort two, there were significant correlations between almost all performance metrics. Early milestones are correlated with the graduation in-training exam score. Linear regression confirmed this relationship after controlling the residents' undergraduate Grade Point Average (GPA). Competency development continues to improve even after residents complete training at Post Graduate Year, PGY4, as residents' achievement in PGY5 continues to improve.

Conclusion

Improved achievement of residents after the introduction of the ACGME-I accreditation is evident. Additionally, the correlation between the graduation in-training exam and graduation milestones, with earlier milestones, suggests a possible use of early milestones in predicting outcomes.

Are Final Residency Milestones Correlated With Early Fellowship Performance in Pediatrics?

PURPOSE

Milestones have been used to assess trainees across graduate medical education programs and reflect a developmental continuum from novice to expert. This study examined whether residency milestones are correlated with initial fellowship milestone performance in pediatrics.

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study used descriptive statistics to assess milestone scores from pediatric fellows who began fellowship training between July 2017 and July 2020. Milestone scores were obtained at the end of residency (R), middle of the first fellowship year (F1), and end of the first fellowship year (F2).

RESULTS

Data represent 3,592 unique trainees. High composite R scores, much lower F1 scores, and slightly higher F2 scores were found over time for all pediatric subspecialities. R scores were positively correlated with F1 scores (Spearman ρ = 0.12, P < .001) and F2 scores (Spearman ρ = 0.15, P < .001). Although scores are negligibly different when trainees graduate from residency, there were differences in F1 and F2 scores among fellows in different specialties. Those who trained at the same institution for residency and fellowship had higher composite milestone F1 and F2 scores compared with those who trained at different institutions ( P < .001). The strongest associations were between R and F2 scores for the professionalism and communication milestones, although associations were still relatively weak overall (r s = 0.13-0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found high R scores and low F1 and F2 scores across all shared milestones, with weak association of scores within competencies, indicating that milestones are context dependent. Although professionalism and communication milestones had a higher correlation compared with the other competencies, the association was still weak. Residency milestones may be useful for individualized education in early fellowship, but fellowship programs should be cautious about overreliance on R scores due to the weak correlation with F1 and F2 scores.

Association of Surgical Resident Competency Ratings With Patient Outcomes

PURPOSE

Accurate assessment of clinical performance is essential to ensure graduating residents are competent for unsupervised practice. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestones framework is the most widely used competency-based framework in the United States. However, the relationship between residents' milestones competency ratings and their subsequent early career clinical outcomes has not been established. It is important to examine the association between milestones competency ratings of U.S. general surgical residents and those surgeons' patient outcomes in early career practice.

METHOD

A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using a sample of national Medicare claims for 23 common, high-risk inpatient general surgical procedures performed between July 1, 2015, and November 30, 2018 (n = 12,400 cases) by nonfellowship-trained U.S. general surgeons. Milestone ratings collected during those surgeons' last year of residency (n = 701 residents) were compared with their risk-adjusted rates of mortality, any complication, or severe complication within 30 days of index operation during their first 2 years of practice.

RESULTS

There were no associations between mean milestone competency ratings of graduating general surgery residents and their subsequent early career patient outcomes, including any complication (23% proficient vs 22% not yet proficient; relative risk [RR], 0.97, [95% CI, 0.88-1.08]); severe complication (9% vs 9%, respectively; RR, 1.01, [95% CI, 0.86-1.19]); and mortality (5% vs 5%; RR, 1.07, [95% CI, 0.88-1.30]). Secondary analyses yielded no associations between patient outcomes and milestone ratings specific to technical performance, or between patient outcomes and composites of operative performance, professionalism, or leadership milestones ratings ( P ranged .32-.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Milestone ratings of graduating general surgery residents were not associated with the patient outcomes of those surgeons when they performed common, higher-risk procedures in a Medicare population. Efforts to improve how milestones ratings are generated might strengthen their association with early career outcomes.

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestone Scores in Pediatrics: Pilot Study Exploring the Relationship Between Residency and Early Fellowship Scores

BACKGROUND

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires Milestone-based assessments of residents and fellows. In pediatrics, 11 subcompetencies are common to both residency and subspecialty fellowship training. It is unknown whether Milestone scores achieved during residency are related to Milestone scores achieved in early fellowship.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between final residency Milestones scores and first-year fellowship Milestones scores in the 11 common subcompetencies (CSCs) across pediatric subspecialties.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-institution cohort study of pediatric fellows beginning fellowship training between July 2016 and July 2019. De-identified Milestone score sets for final residency scores (R), mid-year first-year fellowship scores (F1), and final first-year fellowship scores (F2) were collected. Spearman correlation and regression analyses were used to assess score relationships.

RESULTS

Data for 85 of 98 eligible fellows were collected. Consistently, the F1 scores were lowest, and the R scores were highest. There was a weak positive correlation between the composite R scores and the composite F1 scores. There was a weak positive correlation between residency and fellowship scores for 6 CSCs and no significant correlation for the remaining 5.

CONCLUSION

For the 11 pediatric CSCs, the final residency Milestone scores are consistently higher than and only weakly associated with early fellowship Milestone scores. There may be limitations to the use of residency scores for fellowship program directors in guiding individualized education for early fellows. This study provides groundwork for additional study of Milestone relationships and may help inform the next iteration of pediatric subspecialty Milestones.

Stakeholders' perception on the implementation of Developmental Progress Assessment: using the Theoretical Domains Framework to document behavioral determinants

BACKGROUND

The widespread implementation of longitudinal assessment (LA) to document trainees' progression to independent practice rests more on speculative rather than evidence-based benefits. We aimed to document stakeholders' knowledge of- and attitudes towards LA, and identify how the supports and barriers can help or hinder the uptake and sustainable use of LA.

METHODS

We interviewed representatives from four stakeholder groups involved in LA. The interview protocols were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which contains a total of 14 behaviour change determinants. Two team members coded the interviews deductively to the TDF, with a third resolving differences in coding. The qualitative data analysis was completed with iterative consultations and discussions with team members until consensus was achieved. Saliency analysis was used to identify dominant domains.

RESULTS

Forty-one individuals participated in the study. Three dominant domains were identified. Participants perceive that LA has more positive than negative consequences and requires substantial ressources. All the elements and characteristics of LA are present in our data, with differences between stakeholders.

CONCLUSION

Going forward, we could develop and implement tailored and theory driven interventions to promote a shared understanding of LA, and maintain potential positive outcomes while reducing negative ones. Furthermore, ressources to support LA implementation need to be addressed to facilitate its uptake.

A Multi-Institutional Collaborative To Assess the Knowledge and Skills of Medicine-Pediatrics Residents in Health Care Transition

Background Pediatric to adult health care transition (HCT) is an essential process in the care of youth with special health care needs (YSHCN). Many internal medicine-pediatrics (med-peds) residency programs have developed curricula to teach transition knowledge and skills for the care of YSHCN. Objective Using a national med-peds program director quality improvement collaborative to improve transition curriculum, we aim to identify curricular content areas of improvement by describing baseline trainee knowledge and skills taught through existing transition curricula in med-peds programs. Methods We analyzed data collected during the 2018-2019 national med-peds program director quality improvement collaborative to improve transition curriculum. Program directors assessed their programs, and trainees assessed themselves on five transition goals by completing a Likert-scale questionnaire. In addition, trainees received an objective assessment of their knowledge through a multiple-choice questionnaire (MCQ). Results All 19 programs in the collaborative, and 193 of 316 trainees from these programs, completed the questionnaires. Most programs were based at academic centers (68%) and provided transition training via didactics (63%) and/or subspecialty rotations (58%). More programs had high confidence (95%) than trainees (58%) in goal 1 (knowledge and skills of the issues around transition), whereas more trainees had high confidence (60%) than programs (47%) in goal 2 (understanding the developmental and psychosocial aspects of transition). Programs and trainees self-assessed lower in goals related to health insurance, educational and vocational needs, and application of health care system knowledge to the practice environment (goals 3, 4, and 5, respectively). Conclusions Using the assessments of the program directors and resident trainees, we identified subject areas for improvement of transition curricula, including health insurance and the application of health care system knowledge to the practice environment.

Can ACGME Milestones predict surgical specialty board passage: an example in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Background:

Multiple tools including Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) standardized milestones can be utilized to assess trainee and residency program performance. However, little is known regarding the objective validation of these tools in predicting written board passage.

Methods:

In this retrospective study, data was gathered on n = 45 Wayne State University Obstetrics and Gynecology program graduates over the five-year period ending July 2018. United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) in-training scores and ACGME milestones were used to predict American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) board passage success on first attempt. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results:

Written board passage was associated with average CREOGs (p = 0.01) and milestones (p = 0.008) while USMLE1 was not significantly associated (p = 0.055). USMLE1 <217 (Positive predictive value (PPV) = 96%). CREOGs <197 (PPV = 100%) and milestones <3.25 (PPV = 100%), particularly practice-based learning and systems-based practice milestones were most strongly correlated with board failure. Using a combination of these two milestones, it is possible to correctly predict board passage using our model (PPV = 86%).

Discussion:

This study is the first validating the utility of milestones in a surgical specialty by demonstrating their ability to predict board passage. Residents with CREOGs or milestones below thresholds are at risk for board failure and may warrant early intervention.

Psychometric validation of the Laval developmental benchmarks scale for family medicine

BACKGROUND

With the implementation of competency-based education in family medicine, there is a need for summative end-of-rotation assessments that are criterion-referenced rather than normative. Laval University's family residency program therefore developed the Laval Developmental Benchmarks Scale for Family Medicine (DBS-FM), based on competency milestones. This psychometric validation study investigates its internal structure and its relation to another variable, two sources of validity evidence.

METHODS

We used assessment data from a cohort of residents (n = 1432 assessments) and the Rasch Rating Scale Model to investigate its reliability, dimensionality, rating scale functioning, targeting of items to residents' competency levels, biases (differential item functioning), items hierarchy (adequacy of milestones ordering), and score responsiveness. Convergent validity was estimated by its correlation with the clinical rotation decision (pass, in difficulty/fail).

RESULTS

The DBS-FM can be considered as a unidimensional scale with good reliability for non-extreme scores (.83). The correlation between expected and empirical items hierarchies was of .78, p < .0001.Year 2 residents achieved higher scores than year 1 residents. It was associated with the clinical rotation decision.

CONCLUSION

Advancing its validation, this study found that the DBS-FM has a sound internal structure and demonstrates convergent validity.

Postgraduate Assessment Approaches Across Surgical Specialties: A Systematic Review of the Published Evidence

PURPOSE

Ensuring competence for surgical trainees requires holistic assessment of the qualities and competencies necessary to practice safely and effectively. To determine the next steps toward achieving this aim, the authors conducted a systematic review to summarize and appraise the available evidence related to any assessment approach to postgraduate surgical training and to identify the dominant themes for assessment approaches across different specialties or countries.

METHOD

Medline and Embase were searched on January 10, 2019, without language or time restrictions. Any peer-reviewed study that described an assessment framework (in practice or novel) throughout postgraduate surgical training globally was included. An iterative review and thematic analysis were performed on full-text articles to determine assessment themes. Studies were then grouped by assessment themes. A tailored quality assessment of the studies included in the final analysis was conducted. Assessment themes and validity were compared across surgical specialties and countries.

RESULTS

From an initial 7,059 articles, 91 studies (evaluating 6,563 surgical trainees) were included in the final analysis. Ten defined assessment themes were extracted. Ten studies (11.0%) were deemed low risk of bias based on the quality assessment tool used and thus were determined to be high quality. Minor differences in assessment themes were observed between specialties and countries. Assessment themes neglected by individual surgical specialties and assessment themes that need validated assessment tools were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the low quality of evidence and fragmented efforts to develop and optimize surgical assessments. The minor differences observed demonstrate a common approach, globally and across specialties, related to surgical assessments. A paradigm shift in assessment approaches, which will require national and international collaboration, is required to optimize design and validation so that a comprehensive assessment of surgical competence can be implemented.

Utilization of a quality reporting system to increase faculty participation in resident operative assessment

BACKGROUND

A quality collaborative across our hospital system was initiated to track surgical outcomes. We sought to determine whether incorporating a resident operative performance assessment into this quality collaborative would increase the quantity and quality of these assessments and impact relevant milestones.

METHODS

A resident operative assessment was added to a quality reporting system required to be completed by faculty at the completion of 2 operations. Three milestones directly related to operative performance were analyzed-Patient Care 3, Medical Knowledge 2, and Interpersonal and Communication Skills 3. Residents were divided in 2 groups: quality collaborative (≥10 operative assessments) and no quality collaborative (<10 operative assessments). Milestones from Spring 2019 and Fall 2019 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Faculty participation was 86% with 407 assessments completed from February to October 2019. A difference in the rate of change in resident performance for Patient Care 3 (+0.95 vs +0.55; P = .04) and Interpersonal and Communication Skills 3 (+1.05 vs +0.52; P = .02) was observed for those residents in the quality collaborative group (n = 20) compared with baseline data.

CONCLUSION

Addition of an operative assessment to a mandatory quality collaborative increases faculty participation and impacts resident milestone determination. These findings highlight opportunities to find innovative and efficient methods to improve faculty engagement.

Lessons from the implementation of developmental progress assessment: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Educators and researchers recently implemented developmental progress assessment (DPA) in the context of competency-based education. To reap its anticipated benefits, much still remains to be understood about its implementation. In this study, we aimed to determine the nature and extent of the current evidence on DPA, in an effort to broaden our understanding of the major goals and intended outcomes of DPA as well as the lessons learned from how it has been executed in, or applied across, educational contexts.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping study based on the methodology of Arksey and O'Malley. Our search strategy yielded 2494 articles. These articles were screened for inclusion and exclusion (90% agreement), and numerical and qualitative data were extracted from 56 articles based on a pre-defined set of charting categories. The thematic analysis of the qualitative data was completed with iterative consultations and discussions until consensus was achieved for the interpretation of the results.

RESULTS

Tools used to document DPA include scales, milestones and portfolios. Performances were observed in clinical or standardised contexts. We identified seven major themes in our qualitative thematic analysis: (a) underlying aims of DPA; (b) sources of information; (c) barriers; (d) contextual factors that can act as barriers or facilitators to the implementation of DPA; (e) facilitators; (f) observed outcomes, and (g) documented validity evidences.

CONCLUSIONS

Developmental progress assessment seems to fill a need in the training of future competent health professionals. However, moving forward with a widespread implementation of DPA, factors such as lack of access to user-friendly technology and time to observe performance may render its operationalisation burdensome in the context of competency-based medical education.

Best Approaches to Evaluation and Feedback in Post-Graduate Medical Education

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The objectives of this literature review are to appraise current approaches and assess new technologies that have been utilized for evaluation and feedback of residents, with focus on surgical trainees.

RECENT FINDINGS

In 1999, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education introduced the Milestone system as a tool for summative evaluation. The organization allows individual program autonomy on how evaluation and feedback are performed. In the past, questionnaire evaluations and informal verbal feedback were employed. However, with the advent of technology, they have taken a different shape in the form of crowdsourcing, mobile platforms, and simulation. Limited data is available on new methods but studies show promise citing low cost and positive impact on resident education. No one "best approach" exists for evaluation and feedback. However, it is apparent that a multimodal approach that is based on the ACGME Milestones can be effective and aid in guiding programs.

Utility of Residency Milestones Reported to Fellowship Directors: A National Survey of Pediatric Fellowship Program Directors

OBJECTIVE

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education recently made available final residency Milestones for first-year fellows to fellowship program directors (FPDs). Usefulness of residency Milestones for fellows is unknown. Our objective was to determine how many pediatric FPDs downloaded final residency Milestones for their first-year fellows and FPD perspectives about usefulness of residency Milestones.

METHODS

Mixed methods survey of pediatric FPDs, assessing FPD use of residency Milestones for first-year fellows, and FPD opinions about utility of residency Milestones for fellowship, including during fellow recruitment. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

The response rate was 67.8% (544 of 802). Only 39.3% (209 of 532) of FPDs downloaded final residency Milestones for their first-year fellows. Twenty-four percent (129 of 532) of all FPDs thought residency Milestones were useful. Forty-one percent (218 of 532) thought residency Milestones would be useful during recruitment; others believed this may harm applicants. Of FPDs that downloaded and reviewed residency Milestones, 27% (50 of 185) used them for individualized education. FPDs felt residency Milestones might allow for identification of trainee needs and baseline assessments, but thought that residency Milestones had limited usefulness during fellowship due to concerns about lack of validity evidence, relevance, and how Milestones are assessed and reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Most FPDs find residency Milestones to be of limited utility for their fellows and do not use residency Milestones to tailor education for their first-year fellows. Improving relevance of residency Milestones to fellowship training, validity, and how Milestones are assessed and reported may improve their usefulness for fellow training.

Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Milestones: Initial Formulation and Future Directions

Milestones specific to orthopaedic surgical training document individual resident progress through skill development in multiple dimensions. Residents increasingly interact with and are assessed by surgeons in both academic and private practice environments. Milestones describe the skills that support competence. One of the primary goals of milestones is to provide continuous data for educational quality improvement of residency programs. They provide a dialogue between surgeons who supervise residents or fellows and the program's Clinical Competency Committee throughout a resident's education. The orthopaedic milestones were developed jointly by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery. The working team was designed with broad representation within the specialty. The milestones were introduced to orthopaedic residencies in 2013. Orthopaedics is a 5-year training program; the first comprehensive longitudinal data set is now available for study. This summary provides historical perspective on the development of the milestones, state of current milestone implementation, attempts to establish validity, challenges with the milestones, and the development of next-generation assessment tools.

Competencies and Feedback on Internal Medicine Residents' End-of-Rotation Assessments Over Time: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses

PURPOSE

To examine how qualitative narrative comments and quantitative ratings from end-of-rotation assessments change for a cohort of residents from entry to graduation, and explore associations between comments and ratings.

METHOD

The authors obtained end-of-rotation quantitative ratings and narrative comments for 1 cohort of internal medicine residents at the University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine from July 2013-June 2016. They inductively identified themes in comments, coded orientation (praising/critical) and relevance (specificity and actionability) of feedback, examined associations between codes and ratings, and evaluated changes in themes and ratings across years.

RESULTS

Data comprised 1,869 assessments (828 comments) on 33 residents. Five themes aligned with ACGME competencies (interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, medical knowledge, patient care, and systems-based practice), and 3 did not (personal attributes, summative judgment, and comparison to training level). Work ethic was the most frequent subtheme. Comments emphasized medical knowledge more in year 1 and focused more on autonomy, leadership, and teaching in later years. Most comments (714/828 [86%]) contained high praise, and 412/828 (50%) were very relevant. Average ratings correlated positively with orientation (β = 0.46, P < .001) and negatively with relevance (β = -0.09, P = .01). Ratings increased significantly with each training year (year 1, mean [standard deviation]: 5.31 [0.59]; year 2: 5.58 [0.47]; year 3: 5.86 [0.43]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Narrative comments address resident attributes beyond the ACGME competencies and change as residents progress. Lower quantitative ratings are associated with more specific and actionable feedback.

An Assessment of Fine Surgical KnotTying

OBJECTIVE

Operating room simulation exercises have been well established as an effective means of improving confidence, task engagement, and learning retention among surgical residents. We have established a cost-effective model and scoring system assessing resident skills to tie secure surgical knots with minimal tension.

DESIGN

A circular grid divided into 18 segments was placed underlying an aluminum can. Trainees tie 20 surgical square knots scored for time and total knot length. Movement of the can outside the grid served as a scoring penalty. Recorded were time, length of the 20 knots, and number of segments exposed at exercise end. A score was developed to identify a progression of skills with PGY level. All outcomes were compared between classes using ANOVA.

SETTING

Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital Department of Surgery.

PARTICIPANTS

Surgical residents (PGY1-PGY5) and participating attending surgeons employed by Rhode Island Hospital.

RESULTS

Knot length and exposed segments showed trends of improved scores with ascending PGY level. Only average time attained statistical significance. Overall scores improved with PGY level: Composite scores significantly improved when comparing PGY1 to PGY3, PGY5, and Attending surgeons (p = 0.016, 0.011, and 0.011, respectively). Time significantly improved when comparing PGY1 to PGY3 and Attending surgeons (77vs. 50 and 47 seconds, p = 0.019 and 0.022 respectively). Composite scores were not significantly different above PGY3.

CONCLUSIONS

A low fidelity, high impact knot tying model has been developed to assess the ability to securely tie surgical knots while minimizing tension, with linear increases in scores that appear to plateau at the PGY3 level.

What do quantitative ratings and qualitative comments tell us about general surgery residents' progress toward independent practice? Evidence from a 5-year longitudinal cohort

BACKGROUND

This study examines the alignment of quantitative and qualitative assessment data in end-of-rotation evaluations using longitudinal cohorts of residents progressing throughout the five-year general surgery residency.

METHODS

Rotation evaluation data were extracted for 171 residents who trained between July 2011 and July 2016. Data included 6069 rotation evaluations forms completed by 38 faculty members and 164 peer-residents. Qualitative comments mapped to general surgery milestones were coded for positive/negative feedback and relevance.

RESULTS

Quantitative evaluation scores were significantly correlated with positive/negative feedback, r = 0.52 and relevance, r = -0.20, p < .001. Themes included feedback on leadership, teaching contribution, medical knowledge, work ethic, patient-care, and ability to work in a team-based setting. Faculty comments focused on technical and clinical abilities; comments from peers focused on professionalism and interpersonal relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

We found differences in themes emphasized as residents progressed. These findings underscore improving our understanding of how faculty synthesize assessment data.