Ibrutinib in Steroid-Refractory Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease, a Single-Center Experience

Ibrutinib for therapy of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease: a multicenter real-world analysis

ABSTRACT

To examine the activity of ibrutinib in steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (SR-cGVHD) after the US Food and Drug Administration approval, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study. Data were standardly collected (N = 270 from 19 centers). Involved organs included skin (75%), eye (61%), mouth (54%), joint/fascia (47%), gastrointestinal (GI) (26%), lung (27%), liver (19%), genital (7%), and others (4.4%). The National Institutes of Health (NIH) severity was mild in 5.7%, moderate 42%, and severe 53%. Thirty-nine percent had overlap subtype. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was ≥80% in 72%. The median prednisone was 0.21 mg/kg (0-2.27). Ibrutinib was started at a median of 18.2 months after cGVHD onset and in earlier lines of therapy (second line, 26%; third, 30%; fourth, 21%; fifth, 9.6%; sixth, 10%; seventh or higher, 1.2%). Among evaluable patients, the 6-month NIH overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR]/partial response [PR]) was 45% (PR 42%; CR 3%). The median duration of response was 15 months (range, 1-46). Liver involvement had association with 6-month ORR (multivariate [MVA] odds ratio, 5.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-14.2; P < .001). The best overall response was 56%, with most (86%) achieving by 1 to 3 months. With a median follow-up for survivors of 30.5 months, failure-free survival (FFS) was 59% (53%-65%) at 6 months and 41% (36%-48%) at 12 months. On MVA, increased age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.0-1.02; P = .033), higher baseline prednisone (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.09-3.38; P = .032), and lung involvement (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.1-2.28; P = .016) had worse FFS. Ibrutinib discontinuation was most commonly due to progressive cGVHD (44%) or toxicity (42%). These data support that ibrutinib has activity in SR-cGVHD, provide new insight into factors associated with response and FFS, and demonstrate the toxicity profile associated with discontinuation.

Temporal changes in corticosteroid dose during ibrutinib treatment in patients with cGVHD and pulmonary involvement

The GVH3001 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in Japanese patients with steroid-dependent or -refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). However, the effects of ibrutinib on lung function and reduction in corticosteroid dose, which is a measurable factor associated with improved quality of life, could not be adequately assessed in patients who initially presented with lung involvement. This post hoc analysis aimed to evaluate temporal changes in daily corticosteroid dose, as well as effectiveness outcomes based on lung function and symptom burden (percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s [%FEV1] and Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale lung subscale score, respectively) in the subgroup of patients with cGVHD who had lung involvement at baseline. Seven of the 19 patients in the GVH3001 study had lung involvement at baseline. The daily corticosteroid dose for cGVHD decreased in five of these patients, and %FEV1 remained relatively stable in two patients but increased to > 80% in one patient. Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale scores were relatively stable throughout the study in patients with lung involvement. Ibrutinib may allow corticosteroid dose reduction without worsening lung function or increasing symptom burden in previously treated patients with cGVHD and associated lung involvement.

FDA-approved therapies for chronic GVHD

ABSTACT

Despite novel prophylactic regimens, chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains a challenging complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. cGVHD can affect multiple organs and reduces quality of life, and treatment can cause serious adverse effects. In the past 10 years, the drugs ibrutinib, ruxolitinib, belumosudil, and axatilimab were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for cGVHD. Here, we discuss which signaling pathways and cell types are targeted, the clinical studies that were the basis for FDA approval, and future directions for clinical research.

Graft-Versus-Host Disease Mouse Models: A Clinical-Translational Perspective

A variety of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) models have been developed in mice for the purpose of allowing laboratory investigation of the pathobiology, prevention, and treatment of GVHD in humans. While such models are crucial in advancing our knowledge in this field, there are some key limitations that need to be considered when translating laboratory discoveries into the clinical context. This chapter will discuss current clinical practices in transplantation and GVHD and the relative strengths and weaknesses of mouse models that attempt to replicate these states.

Cell Therapy Transplant Canada (CTTC) Consensus-Based Guideline 2024 for Management and Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Future Directions for Development

This is a consensus-based Canadian guideline whose primary purpose is to standardize and facilitate the management of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) across the country. Creating uniform healthcare guidance in Canada is a challenge for a number of reasons including the differences in healthcare authority structure, funding and access to healthcare resources between provinces and territories, as well as the geographic size. These differences can lead to variable and unequal access to effective therapies for GvHD. This document will provide comprehensive and practical guidance that can be applied across Canada by healthcare professionals caring for patients with cGvHD. Hopefully, this guideline, based on input from GvHD treaters across the country, will aid in standardizing cGvHD care and facilitate access to much-needed novel therapies. This consensus paper aims to discuss the optimal approach to the initial assessment of cGvHD, review the severity scoring and global grading system, discuss systemic and topical treatments, as well as supportive therapies, and propose a therapeutic algorithm for frontline and subsequent lines of cGvHD treatment in adults and pediatric patients. Finally, we will make suggestions about the future direction of cGvHD treatment development such as (1) a mode-of-action-based cGvHD drug selection, according to the pathogenesis of cGvHD, (2) a combination strategy with the introduction of newer targeted drugs, (3) a steroid-free regimen, particularly for front line therapy for cGvHD treatment, and (4) a pre-emptive approach which can prevent the progression of cGvHD in high-risk patients destined to develop severe and highly morbid forms of cGvHD.

Prophylaxis and management of graft-versus-host disease after stem-cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: updated consensus recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major factor contributing to mortality and morbidity after allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). In the last 3 years, there has been regulatory approval of new drugs and considerable change in clinical approaches to prophylaxis and management of GVHD. To standardise treatment approaches, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) has updated its clinical practice recommendations. We formed a panel of one methodologist and 22 experts in the field of GVHD management. The selection was made on the basis of their role in GVHD management in Europe and their contributions to the field, such as publications, presentations at conferences, and other research. We applied the GRADE process to ten PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions: evidence was searched for by the panel and graded for each crucial outcome. In two consensus meetings, we discussed the evidence and voted on the wording and strengths of recommendations. Key updates to the recommendations include: (1) primary use of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute GVHD and steroid-refractory chronic GVHD as the new standard of care, (2) use of rabbit anti-T-cell (thymocyte) globulin or post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as standard GVHD prophylaxis in peripheral blood stem-cell transplantations from unrelated donors, and (3) the addition of belumosudil to the available treatment options for steroid-refractory chronic GVHD. The EBMT proposes to use these recommendations as the basis for routine management of GVHD during allogenic HSCT. The current recommendations favour European practice and do not necessarily represent global preferences.

Understanding and treatment of cutaneous graft-versus-host-disease

The skin is the outermost mechanical barrier where dynamic immune reactions take place and is the most commonly affected site in both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). If not properly treated, pain and pruritis resulting from cutaneous GVHD can increase the risk of secondary infection due to erosions, ulcerations, and damage of underlying tissues. Furthermore, resulting disfiguration can cause distress and significantly impact patients' quality of life. Thus, a deeper understanding of skin-specific findings of GVHD is needed. This review will highlight some promising results of recent pre-clinical studies on the pathophysiology of skin GVHD and summarize the diagnostic and staging/grading procedures according to the clinical manifestations of skin GVHD. In addition, we will summarize outcomes of various GVHD treatments, including skin-specific response rates.

Single centre retrospective analysis of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) therapy in patients heavily pre-treated for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) with steroid failure

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is recommended as a second- or later-line therapy for chronic GvHD (cGvHD). Benefits include reasonable response with avoidance of intense systemic immunosuppression, which can translate into lowering the risk of systemic toxicity and opportunistic infection.

METHODS

We evaluated 75 patients treated with ECP for cGvHD from 2007 to 2021 at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, and analyzed overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit (CB) at 3, 6 and 12 months plus other long-term treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 72 months, a gradual increase in ORR was noted over time: 21% (16 out of 75 patients), 57% (36/63) and 70% (32/46) at month 3, 6 and 12, respectively. Gradual increase in CB was also observed over time with CB rate of 23% (17/75), 62% (39/63), and 76% (35/46) at months 3, 6 and 12, respectively. A total of 27 failures (36%) were noted, due to: 1) ECP resistance requiring switch to other therapy (n = 14, 19%), 2) non-relapse mortality (n = 10, 13%), 3) relapse of primary disease (n = 1, 1%) or 4) ECP procedure-related complication (n = 1, 1%, line infection), with 20 deaths (27%) observed. Failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 68.3% and 85.9% at 12 months, respectively. After starting ECP, the proportions of patients who completely discontinued steroids were 17%, 32%, and 64% at months 3, 6 and 12, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ECP is an effective treatment option for heavily pre-treated cGvHD patients.

Chronic GvHD NIH Consensus Project Biology Task Force: evolving path to personalized treatment of chronic GvHD

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) remains a prominent barrier to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantion as the leading cause of nonrelapse mortality and significant morbidity. Tremendous progress has been achieved in both the understanding of pathophysiology and the development of new therapies for cGvHD. Although our field has historically approached treatment from an empiric position, research performed at the bedside and bench has elucidated some of the complex pathophysiology of cGvHD. From the clinical perspective, there is significant variability of disease manifestations between individual patients, pointing to diverse biological underpinnings. Capitalizing on progress made to date, the field is now focused on establishing personalized approaches to treatment. The intent of this article is to concisely review recent knowledge gained and formulate a path toward patient-specific cGvHD therapy.

The delicate balance of graft versus leukemia and graft versus host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The curative basis of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) relies in part upon the graft versus leukemia (GvL) effect, whereby donor immune cells recognize and eliminate recipient malignant cells. However, alloreactivity of donor cells against recipient tissues may also be deleterious. Chronic graft versus host disease (cGvHD) is an immunologic phenomenon wherein alloreactive donor T cells aberrantly react against host tissues, leading to damaging inflammatory symptoms.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we discuss biological insights into GvL and cGvHD and strategies to balance the prevention of GvHD with maintenance of GvL in modern HSCT.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

Relapse remains the leading cause of mortality after HSCT with rates as high as 40% for some diseases. GvHD is a major cause of morbidity after HSCT, occurring in up to half of patients and responsible for 15-20% of deaths after HSCT. Intriguingly, the development of chronic GvHD may be linked to lower relapse rates after HSCT, suggesting that GvL and GvHD may be complementary sides of the immunologic foundation of HSCT. The ability to fine tune the balance of GvL and GvHD will lead to improvements in survival, relapse rates, and quality of life for patients undergoing HSCT.

Axatilimab for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Failure of at Least Two Prior Systemic Therapies: Results of a Phase I/II Study

PURPOSE

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains the major cause of late morbidity after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R)-dependent macrophages promote cGVHD fibrosis, and their elimination in preclinical studies ameliorated cGVHD. Axatilimab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits CSF-1R signaling and restrains macrophage development.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase I (phI)/phase II (phII) open-label study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03604692) evaluated safety, tolerability, and efficacy of axatilimab in patients age ≥ 6 years with active cGVHD after ≥ 2 prior systemic therapy lines. Primary objectives in phI were to identify the optimal biologic and recommended phII dose and in phII to evaluate the overall (complete and partial) response rate (ORR) at the start of treatment cycle 7.

RESULTS

Forty enrolled patients (17 phI; 23 phII) received at least one axatilimab dose. In phI, a dose of 3 mg/kg given once every 4 weeks met the optimal biologic dose definition. Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the 3 mg/kg dose given once every 2 weeks. At least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was observed in 30 patients with grade ≥ 3 TRAEs in eight patients, the majority known on-target effects of CSF-1R inhibition. No cytomegalovirus reactivations occurred. With the 50% ORR at cycle 7 day 1, the phII cohort met the primary efficacy end point. Furthermore, the ORR in the first six cycles, an end point supporting regulatory approvals, was 82%. Responses were seen in all affected organs regardless of prior therapy. Fifty-eight percent of patients reported significant improvement in cGVHD-related symptoms using the Lee Symptom Scale. On-target activity of axatilimab was suggested by the decrease in skin CSF-1R-expressing macrophages.

CONCLUSION

Targeting profibrotic macrophages with axatilimab is a therapeutically promising novel strategy with a favorable safety profile for refractory cGVHD.

A Phase I Trial of SYK Inhibition with Fostamatinib in the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Despite the exciting advancement of novel therapies, chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains the most common cause of non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Frontline treatment of cGVHD involves systemic steroids, which are associated with significant morbidities. We previously found that inhibition of spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) with fostamatinib preferentially eradicated aberrantly activated B cells in both ex vivo studies of cGVHD patient B cells, as well as in vivo mouse studies. These and other preclinical studies implicated hyper-reactive B-cell receptor signaling and increased SYK expression in the pathogenesis of cGVHD and compelled this first in-human allogeneic HCT clinical trial. We investigated the safety and efficacy of the oral SYK inhibitor, fostamatinib, for both the prevention and treatment of cGVHD. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of fostamatinib and determine its maximum tolerated dose in the post-HCT setting. Secondary objectives included assessing the efficacy of fostamatinib in preventing and treating cGVHD, as well as examining alterations in B-cell compartments with treatment. This was a single-institution phase I clinical trial that evaluated the use of fostamatinib in allogeneic HCT patients before the development of cGVHD or at the time of steroid-refractory cGVHD (SR-cGVHD). Patients received fostamatinib at one of three dose levels using a continual reassessment algorithm to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Multiparameter flow cytometry was used to evaluate changes in B cell subpopulations over the first year of treatment with fostamatinib. Nineteen patients were enrolled in this phase I trial, with 5 in the prophylaxis arm and 14 in the therapeutic arm. One patient (5%) required discontinuation of therapy for a dose-limiting toxicity. At a median follow-up of over 3 years, no patients had cancer relapse while on fostamatinib treatment, and recurrent malignancy was observed in 1 patient 2 years after the end of therapy. In the prophylaxis arm, 1 of 5 patients (20%) developed cGVHD while on fostamatinib. In the therapeutic arm, the overall response rate was 77%, with a complete response rate of 31%. The median duration of response was 19.3 months and the 12-month failure-free survival was 69% (95% confidence interval, 48-100). Patients were able to reduce their steroid dose by a median of 80%, with 73% remaining on a lower dose at 1 year compared to baseline. There was an early reduction in the proportion of IgD-CD38hi plasmablast-like cells with fostamatinib treatment, particularly in those SR-cGVHD patients who had an eventual response. B-cell reconstitution was not significantly impacted by fostamatinib therapy after allogeneic HCT. Fostamatinib featured a favorable safety profile in the post-HCT setting. Our data suggests an early efficacy signal that was associated with effects on expected cell targets in both the prophylaxis and treatment of cGVHD, providing rationale for a phase II investigation.

Cytochrome P450 inhibition to decrease dosage and costs of venetoclax and ibrutinib: A proof-of-concept case study

The inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes is the most frequent cause of drug-drug interactions. Many safe, inexpensive and widely available therapeutic drugs can inhibit CYP enzymes (e.g., azoles). Also, the specific potency of inhibition and the targeted CYP enzyme have been well described (e.g., itraconazole strongly inhibits CYP enzyme 3A4 and, in turn, CYP3A4 metabolizes venetoclax and ibrutinib). CYP enzyme inhibitors increase the plasma concentration of other drugs via shared metabolic pathways. We herein present the effects of inhibiting CYP enzymes with itraconazole-venetoclax for the treatment of refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, as well as itraconazole-ibrutinib to treat steroid-refractory acute graft vs. host disease in the same patient. Both of the patient's conditions responded completely. This appears to be a feasible strategy that decreases treatment costs by 75%. Previous Food and Drug Administration recommendations and clinical data support these subsequent dose reductions. Eleven months after the transplant, the patient remains in complete response and with no minimal residual disease. Another patient had been effectively treated before with CYP enzyme inhibition prior to venetoclax-itraconazole administration for orbital myeloid sarcoma. Thus, this case study furthers information on the CYP enzyme inhibition strategy when associated with another costly drug, ibrutinib. The CYP enzyme inhibition strategy could be applied to many more anticancer drugs (e.g., ruxolitinib and ponatinib) and facilitate the availability of expensive oncological treatments in low- and middle-income countries. Also, this strategy could be further generalized by using different CYP enzyme inhibitors with varied pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties (i.e., grapefruit, azoles and clarithromycin).

Ibrutinib for First-Line Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Results From the Randomized Phase III iNTEGRATE Study

PURPOSE

To present primary and final analyses from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III iNTEGRATE study, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of ibrutinib with prednisone in previously untreated patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD).

METHODS

Patients (age ≥ 12 years) with newly diagnosed moderate or severe cGVHD, requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy, and with no prior systemic treatment for cGVHD were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ibrutinib 420 mg once daily plus prednisone, starting at 1 mg/kg once daily or placebo plus prednisone. The primary end point was response rate at 48 weeks according to 2014 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project Criteria. Other end points included event-free survival, duration of response, time to withdrawal of immunosuppressants, improvement in Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale score, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Ninety-five and 98 patients enrolled in the ibrutinib-prednisone and placebo-prednisone arms, respectively. At 48 weeks, response rates were 41% (ibrutinib-prednisone) and 37% (placebo-prednisone; P = .54). At 33 months of follow-up, median duration of response was 19 months (ibrutinib-prednisone) and 10 months (placebo-prednisone; P = .10). Median event-free survival was 15 months (ibrutinib-prednisone) and 8 months (placebo-prednisone; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.1; P = .11). Improvement in overall Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale was 43% (ibrutinib-prednisone) and 31% (placebo-ibrutinib; P = .07). Median OS was not reached in either arm. The 24-month Kaplan-Meier OS estimates were 80% for both arms (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.90). Grade ≥ 3 serious adverse events occurred in 49% (ibrutinib-prednisone) and 47% (placebo-prednisone) of patients.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistical difference observed in the primary and secondary end points with ibrutinib-prednisone treatment. No new safety signals were observed with ibrutinib treatment in previously untreated patients with cGVHD. The primary end point of iNTEGRATE was not met.

Organ-specific response after low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for steroid refractory chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

Despite new therapeutic options, treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (SR-cGVHD) remains challenging as organ involvement and clinical manifestations are highly variable. In previous trials of low-dose interleukin-2 (LD IL-2), we established the safety and efficacy of LD IL-2 for treatment of SR-cGVHD. In the present report, we combined 5 phase I or II clinical trials conducted at our center to investigate organ-specific response rate, co-involvement of organs, predictors of organ-specific response and its possible association with immune response. For 105 adult patients included in this report, the overall response rate after 8 or 12 weeks LD IL-2 was 48.6% and 53.3% including late responses in patients who continued treatment for extended periods. Skin was the most frequent organ involved (84%) and the organ-specific response rate was highest in liver (66.7%) followed by GI (62.5%), skin (36.4%), joint/muscle/fascia (34.2%) and lung (19.2%). In multivariable analysis, shorter time from diagnosis of cGVHD to IL-2 initiation, shorter time from transplant to IL-2 initiation, and fewer prior therapies were associated with overall response as well as skin response. For immunologic correlates, CD4Treg:CD4Tcon ratio at one week was significantly higher in patients with overall and skin response; skin response was significantly associated with lower number of total CD3 T cells, CD4Tcon and CD8 T cells and higher number of B cells. For lung responders, terminal effector memory cell counts were lower within all T cell populations compared to non-responders. Organ-specific mechanisms of injury should be investigated and organ-specific targeted therapies need to be developed.

OUP accepted manuscript

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. For many years, there have been few effective treatment options for patients with GVHD. First-line systemic treatment remains corticosteroids, but up to 50% of patients will develop steroid-refractory GVHD and the prognosis for these patients is poor. Elucidation of the pathophysiological mechanisms of acute and chronic GVHD has laid a foundation for novel therapeutic approaches. Since 2017, there have now been 4 approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for GVHD. Ruxolitinib, an oral selective JAK1/2 inhibitor, received FDA approval for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute GVHD in 2019 and remains the only agent approved for acute GVHD. There are currently 3 FDA approvals for the treatment of chronic GVHD: (1) ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor traditionally used for B-cell malignancies, was the first agent approved for chronic GVHD after failure of one or more lines of systemic therapy, (2) belumosudil, an oral selective inhibitor of ROCK2, for patients with chronic GVHD who received at least 2 prior lines of treatment, and (3) ruxolitinib for chronic GVHD after failure of one or two lines of systemic therapy. In this review, we highlight the clinical data which support these FDA approvals in acute and chronic GVHD with a focus on mechanism of actions, clinical efficacy, and toxicities associated with these agents.