Bridging Radiation Rapidly and Effectively Cytoreduces High-Risk Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B Cell Lymphomas Prior to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy

Enhancing CAR-T Efficacy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Radiation Bridging Therapy: A Real-World Single-Center Experience

One challenge of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is achieving disease control during manufacturing. We report real-word outcomes of 100 patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, n = 50) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel, n = 50) at our center. Most patients received bridging therapy (BT) with 48 undergoing radiation BT (RBT) and 32 receiving systemic BT (SBT). The best overall response rate (ORR) was 84% (78% complete response (CR)) for axi-cel and 60% (42% CR) for tisa-cel. At a median follow-up of 16 months, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 72% and 82% for axi-cel, compared to 35% and 57% for tisa-cel. By the bridging approach, 12-month PFS was 60% with RBT, 59% without BT and 35% with SBT (p = 0.06). Notably, axi-cel patients without lymphoma progression during manufacturing (n = 24) achieved 12-month PFS and OS rates of 91% and 96%, respectively. Axi-cel was associated with more cytokine release syndrome (92% vs. 66%, p = 0.003) and neurotoxicity (all-grade 56% vs. 10%, p < 0.001, grade ≥ 328% vs. 4%, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified RBT as independently associated with improved PFS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96). Pending prospective validation, RBT shows promise for improving CAR-T outcomes in LBCL.

Characterization of Lymphopenia and Correlating the Risk of Cytopenias With Dose and Bone Marrow Volume Irradiated in Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma Patients Bridged With Radiation Therapy for Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy

PURPOSE

The impact of bridging radiation therapy (bRT) for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy on absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) kinetics and treatment outcome is unknown.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed adults with relapsed/refractory aggressive large B cell lymphoma who received bRT before CD-19 CAR-T between November 2017 and April 2023. The change in ALC (ALC Δ RT) was computed by subtracting ALC pre- and post-bRT. Percent bone marrow (%BM) irradiated was calculated by estimating skeletal BM distribution. Progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were modeled via Kaplan-Meier.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients received bRT, of which 13 (25.5%) had bulky disease (≥7.5 cm). The median bRT dose was 30 Gy (range, 4-48 Gy); 26 patients (51%) received ≥30 Gy. Thirty-one patients (61%) received bRT comprehensively to all disease sites. The median cumulative %BM irradiated was 5.05% (range, 0-50%). At a median follow-up of 10.3 months (95% CI, 7.7-16.4), the 1-year OS, PFS, and DSS rates were 80% (95% CI, 66-99), 78% (64-87), and 82% (68-90), respectively. The incidence of grade ≥3 lymphopenia was 33% pre-RT and 68% post-RT, but recovered to 43% at the conditioning chemotherapy timepoint. There was no correlation between post-RT grade ≥3 lymphopenia and the receipt of comprehensive bRT, combined modality bridging, ≥30 Gy bRT, or bRT to ≥15% of BM (all P > .2). Among patients with grade 0-2 lymphopenia pre-RT, increased conversion to grade ≥3 lymphopenia post-RT correlated with comprehensive or ≥30 Gy bRT, but these factors did not impair ALC recovery at conditioning chemotherapy. There was no association between ALC Δ RT or post-RT ALC with 30 or 90 day response (P > .25), DSS, PFS, or OS (P > .3).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphocyte change during bRT is not associated with CAR-T outcomes. Persistent cytopenia risk after bRT is not associated with bRT to ≥30 Gy, ≥15% of BM, or comprehensive coverage. Although bRT can be delivered safely, we urge careful treatment planning when incorporating into pre-CAR-T regimens.

Outcomes with bridging radiation therapy prior to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with aggressive large B-cell lymphomas

Background

Select patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B cell lymphoma may benefit from bridging radiation (bRT) prior to anti-CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T). Here, we examined patient and treatment factors associated with outcomes and patterns of failure after bRT and CAR-T.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed adults with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received bRT prior to axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, or lisocabtagene maraleucel between 11/2017-4/2023. Clinical/treatment characteristics, response, and toxicity were extracted. Survival was modeled using Kaplan-Meier or Cox regression models for events distributed over time, or binary logistic regression for disease response. Fisher's Exact Test or Mann-Whitney U methods were used.

Results

Of 51 patients, 25.5% had bulky disease and 64.7% had Stage III/IV disease at the time of RT. Comprehensive bRT alone to all disease sites was delivered to 51% of patients, and 29.4% were additionally bridged with systemic therapy. Median follow-up was 10.3 months (95% CI: 7.7-16.4). Overall response rate (ORR) was 82.4% at 30 days post-CAR-T infusion. Median overall survival (OS) was 22.1 months (6.6-not reached) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.4 months (5.5-30). OS/PFS were 80% (66-99)/78% (64-87) at 1-year, and 59% (44-71)/54% (40-67) at 2-years, respectively. Comprehensive RT to all sites of disease correlated with improved PFS and OS, p ≤ 0.04. Additionally, ECOG ≥2 and Stage III/IV disease predicted poor OS (p ≤ 0.02). Disease bulk, IPI ≥3, and non-GCB histology were poor predictors for disease-specific survival (DSS), p<0.05. The latter two, as well as bRT dose of ≤30 Gy predicted worse PFS (p<0.05). Among patients with advanced stage disease, comprehensive bRT to all sites of disease (n=10) was not associated with improved OS and PFS compared to focal bRT (n=23), p>0.17. No difference was seen in bridging RT vs. chemoRT. Twenty-six patients developed relapse (50.9%), of which 46% was in-field. Risk of in-field relapse correlated with bulky disease (OR=7, 95% CI: 1.2-41, p=0.03) and lack of response at 30 day post-CAR-T evaluation (OR=16.8, 95% CI: 1.6-176, p=0.02), but not with bRT dose (p=0.27).

Conclusion

bRT and CART is a good treatment strategy for select patients with aggressive B cell lymphoma. Comprehensive bRT including all sites of disease is associated with improved outcomes.

The contemporary spectrum of radiotherapy for hematologic malignancies involving the central nervous system: From focal therapy to craniospinal

The contemporary landscape of systemic therapy options for hematologic malignancies involving the central nervous system (CNS-HM) is rapidly evolving; a key question is how radiotherapy (RT) can be optimally integrated to improve patient outcomes. Historically, use of RT to treat CNS-HM was defined by broad fields and high doses. While effective, this approach raised concerns of potential neurotoxicity which significantly decreased RT utilization. RT was replaced by high-dose, CNS-penetrant, systemic therapies that offered durable control with lower perceived neurotoxic risk. But, as the therapeutic toolbox for CNS-HM expands, so too does the complexity and diversity of potential clinical scenarios where RT should be considered. In this review, we describe both well-established and emerging opportunities for RT integration, emphasizing how dose selection and field design could balance neurotoxicity risk and disease control. We propose an anatomical framework that captures the diverse utilization of RT for CNS-HM and serves as a practical guide for RT volume and dose design.

Role of bridging RT in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma undergoing CAR-T therapy: a multicenter study

The optimization of bridging regimen before chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may impact CAR-T efficacy and outcome. This retrospective study evaluates CAR-T outcome after bridging with radiotherapy (RT) and other bridging strategies. Among 148 patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who underwent leukapheresis for CAR-T manufacturing, 31 received RT-bridging, 84 chemotherapy (CT), 33 no-bridging or steroid-only. CAR-T cell were infused in 96.8% of RT-group, 89.2% of CT-group and 78.8% of no-bridge-group (p = 0.079). Response to bridging was generally poor, but patients receiving RT had a significant reduction in LDH levels between pre- and post-bridging (p = 0.05). The one-year PFS was 51.2% in the RT-group, 28.2% in the CT-group, and 47.6% in the no-bridge-group (p = 0.044, CT-bridging vs RT-bridging); 1-year OS was 86.7% in the RT-group, 52.7% in the CT-group and 69% in the no-bridge-group (p = 0.025, CT-bridging vs RT-bridging). We observed a higher incidence of ICANS in patients who received CT than in others (20.0% CT-group, 3.3% RT-group, 7.7% no-bridge group; p = 0.05). In conclusion, RT-bridging is associated with lower drop-out rate and CAR-T toxicity, and it might be preferred to other bridging strategies for patients with localized disease or for those with one prevalent symptomatic site.

Health-related quality of life dynamics: modeling insights from immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Understanding health-related quality of life (HRQoL) dynamics is essential for assessing and improving treatment experiences; however, clinical and observational studies struggle to capture their full complexity. We use simulation modeling and the case of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell therapy-a type of cancer immunotherapy that can prolong survival, but carries life-threatening risks-to study HRQoL dynamics.

METHODS

We developed an exploratory system dynamics model with mathematical equations and parameter values informed by literature and expert insights. We refined its feedback structure and evaluated its dynamic behavior through iterative interviews. Model simulated HRQoL from treatment approval through six months post-infusion. Two strategies-reducing the delay to infusion and enhancing social support-were incorporated into the model. To dynamically evaluate the effect of these strategies, we developed four metrics: post-treatment HRQoL decline, recovery time to pre-treatment HRQoL, post-treatment HRQoL peak, and durability of the peak.

RESULTS

Model captures key interactions within HRQoL, providing a nuanced analysis of its continuous temporal dynamics, particularly physical well-being, psychological well-being, tumor burden, receipt and efficacy of treatment, side effects, and their management. Model analysis shows reducing infusion delays enhanced HRQoL across all four metrics. While enhanced social support improved the first three metrics for patients who received treatment, it did not change durability of the peak.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulation modeling can help explore the effects of strategies on HRQoL while also demonstrating the dynamic interactions between its key components, offering a powerful tool to investigate aspects of HRQoL that are difficult to assess in real-world settings.

The Role of Radiotherapy in Lymphoma Patients Undergoing CAR T Therapy: Past, Present, and Future

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell receptor therapy has transformed outcomes for patients with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). It is currently approved in the third line for all patients and in the second line for early relapsed or primary refractory disease. Although CAR T cell therapy offers the potential for improved outcomes, its use may also include logistical delays related to referral, medical, social, and financial clearance as well as manufacturing time; more than half of patients experience disease recurrence or progression while awaiting CAR T infusion. Bridging radiotherapy, defined as radiation delivered between the decision to pursue CAR T and infusion of CAR T cells, has become an attractive option for patients who would benefit from local disease control or palliation of symptoms. Additionally, patterns of failure analyses have revealed a dominant role of local disease progression, which has fueled investigations on bridging and early salvage radiation to improve long-term outcomes in patients, particularly those with localized or high-risk disease. Several potential mechanisms by which radiation therapy may improve CAR T efficacy have been proposed that include cytoreduction, tumor debulking, neutralization of immunosuppressive hypoxic and acidic tumor microenvironments, and immunologic and pro-apoptotic synergy between radiation and CAR T. Prospective clinical trials and translational work are ongoing and are needed to inform our conceptual understanding of potential mechanisms by which radiation therapy may improve CAR T efficacy and toxicity, identify which patients may be most likely to benefit, and confirm proposed clinical benefits.

Hyper-fractionated radiotherapy as a bridging strategy to enhance CAR-T efficacy by regulating T-cell co-stimulatory molecules in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Background

Bridging therapy can prevent patients from disease progression while waiting for CAR-T cell preparation. Hyper-fractionated radiotherapy can achieve an effective target dose within a short period, minimize radiation damage, and may modify immune environment compared to conventional radiotherapy.

Aims

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of bridging hyper-fractionated radiotherapy in combination with CAR-T therapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The potential mechanisms were explored.

Methods

This is a prospective pilot study. After T-cell collection, the patients underwent hyper-fractionated radiotherapy at lesion sites with 1.5 Gy twice daily for 10 days before CAR-T cell infusion. Peripheral blood immune cell subsets and quantitative serum proteomics were assessed before radiotherapy and after radiotherapy before CAR-T cell infusion.

Results

A total of 13 patients have been enrolled. The median follow-up time was 6 (3-24) months after CAR-T infusion. At 3-month follow-up, 9/13(69%) patients had CR, 1/13(8%) patient had PR, 1/13(8%) patient remained SD, and 2/13(15%) patients died of disease progression. The local recurrence rate was 1/13(8%). Seven patients have been followed up for more than 6 months, and they remain in CR. The median PFS and OS were not reached. No grade 3-4 CRS or ICANS were reported. After hyper-fractionated radiotherapy, peripheral PD1+CD8+T/T ratio significantly decreased while quantitative serum proteomics profiling showed a decrease in sCD28.

Conclusion

Hyper-fractionated radiotherapy can rapidly control tumor progression sites without delaying the infusion time. This approach can improve the ORR and does not increase the incidence of CRS and ICANS. The mechanism may be related to the regulation of T-cell co-stimulatory molecules, which demands further exploration.

Metabolic Tumor Volume Response after Bridging Therapy Determines Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Outcomes in Large B-Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE

Greater disease burden is a well-established predictor of poorer outcomes following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy. Although bridging therapy (BT) is widely used between leukapheresis and CAR T infusion, limited data have evaluated the impact of BT on CAR T outcomes. In this study, we hypothesized that the quantitative dynamics of radiomic cytoreduction during bridging are prognostic.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with large B-cell lymphoma treated with CD19-CAR T from 2016 to 2022 were included in the study. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was determined for all patients on pre-leukapheresis PET and on post-BT/pre-infusion PET in those who received BT. Patients were stratified into "High" and "Low" disease burden using an MTV cutpoint of 65.4cc established by maximally selected log-rank statistic for progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Of 191 patients treated with CAR T, 144 (75%) received BT. In the BT cohort, 56% had a reduction in MTV post-BT. On multivariate analysis, the MTV trajectory across the bridging period remained significantly associated with PFS (P < 0.001); however, notably, patients with improved MTV (High->Low) had equivalent PFS compared with those with initially and persistently low MTV (Low->Low; HR for High->Low MTV: 2.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-9.18). There was a reduction in any grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome in the High->Low MTV cohort as compared with the High->High MTV cohort (13% vs. 41%; P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to use radiomics to quantify disease burden pre- and post-BT in a large real-world large B-cell lymphoma cohort. We demonstrate that effective BT can enable initially high-disease burden patients to achieve post-CAR T outcomes comparable with low-disease burden patients.

Clinical features, pathophysiology, and management of acute myelopathy following CAR T-cell therapy

ABSTRACT

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies, but it comes with unique toxicities, notably cytokine release syndrome and ICANS (immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome). As experience with CAR T-cell therapy grows, distinct and infrequent neurologic complications are becoming increasingly evident. Recently, reports of acute myelopathy after the administration of CAR T-cell therapies have been accumulating. Despite the establishment of consensus guidelines for managing ICANS, there remains limited guidance on the appropriate investigations and treatments for this rare complication. In this manuscript, we delve into the clinical features, pathophysiology, and strategies for the optimal management of acute myelitis after CAR T-cell therapy and draw insights from reported cases in the literature.

CNS bridging radiotherapy achieves rapid cytoreduction before CAR T-cell therapy for aggressive B-cell lymphomas

ABSTRACT

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CART) for central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is a promising strategy, yet responses are frequently not durable. Bridging radiotherapy (BRT) is used for extracranial lymphoma in which it can improve CART outcomes through cytoreduction of high-risk lesions. We hypothesized that BRT would achieve similar, significant cytoreduction before CART for CNSL (CNS-BRT). We identified patients with CNSL with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma who received CNS-BRT before commercial CART. Cytoreduction from CNS-BRT was calculated as change in lesion size before CART. Twelve patients received CNS-BRT, and the median follow-up among survivors is 11.8 months (interquartile range, 8.5-21.9). Ten patients had CNSL (9 secondary, 1 primary) and 2 patients had epidural disease (evaluable for toxicity). All 10 patients with CNSL had progressive disease at the time of CNS-BRT. Of 12 patients, 1 experienced grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome, and 3 of 12 patients experienced grade ≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. CNS-BRT achieved a 74.0% (95% confidence interval, 62.0-86.0) mean reduction in lesion size from baseline (P = .014) at a median of 12 days from BRT completion and before CART infusion. Best CNS response included 8 complete responses, 1 partial response, and 1 progressive disease. Three patients experienced CNS relapse outside the BRT field. Preliminary data suggest CNS-BRT achieves rapid cytoreduction and is associated with a favorable CNS response and safety profile. These data support further study of BRT as a bridging modality for CNSL CART.

Prognostic significance of fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography delta radiomics following bridging therapy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma undergoing CAR T-cell therapy

Purpose/objectives

Bridging radiation therapy (bRT) is increasingly being utilized prior to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). It is unknown how the extent of cytoreduction during bRT impacts outcomes.

Materials/methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with LBCL treated with bRT followed by CAR T-cell therapy. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were extracted from F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scans acquired prior to bRT and between completion of bRT and CAR T-cell infusion. Delta radiomics based on changes of these values were then calculated. The association between delta radiomics and oncologic outcomes [progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from distant progression (FFDP), and local control (LC)] were then examined.

Results

Thirty-three sites across 23 patients with LBCL were irradiated. All metabolically active disease was treated in 10 patients. Following bRT, median overall decreases (including unirradiated sites) in MTV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG were 22.2 cc (63.1%), 8.9 (36.8%), 3.4 (31.1%), and 297.9 cc (75.8%), respectively. Median decreases in MTV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG in irradiated sites were 15.6 cc (91.1%), 17.0 (74.6%), 6.8 (55.3%), and 157.0 cc (94.6%), respectively. Median follow-up was 15.2 months. A decrease in SUVmax of at least 54% was associated with improved PFS (24-month PFS: 83.3% vs. 28.1%; p = 0.037) and FFDP (24-month FFDP: 100% vs. 62.4%; p < 0.001). A decrease in MTV of at least 90% was associated with improved FFDP (24-month FFDP: 100% vs. 62.4%; p < 0.001). LC was improved in sites with decreases in SUVmax of at least 71% (24-month LC: 100% vs. 72.7%; p < 0.001). Decreases of MTV by at least 90% (100% vs. 53.3%; p = 0.038) and TLG by at least 95% (100% vs. 56.3%; p = 0.067) were associated with an improved complete response rate.

Conclusion

bRT led to substantial reductions in MTV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG. The relative extent of these decreases correlated with improved outcomes after CAR T-cell infusion. Prospective cohorts should validate the value of interim PET following bRT for quantifying changes in disease burden and associated prognosis.

Outcomes of patients with R/R B-cell NHL and limited (<5 sites) pre-CART disease bridged with or without radiotherapy

ABSTRACT

Unirradiated patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who undergo anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) have a predominant localized pattern of relapse, the significance of which is heightened in individuals with limited/localized disease before CART. This study reports on the outcomes of patients with R/R NHL and limited (<5 involved sites) disease bridged with or without radiotherapy. A multicenter retrospective review of 150 patients with R/R NHL who received CART with <5 disease sites before leukapheresis was performed. Bridging treatment, if any, was administered between leukapheresis and CART infusion. Study end points included relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival. Before CART infusion, 48 patients (32%) received bridging radiotherapy (BRT), and 102 (68%) did not. The median follow-up was 21 months. After CART infusion, BRT patients had higher objective response (92% vs 78%; P = .046) and sustained complete response rates (54% vs 33%; P = .015). Local relapse in sites present before CART was lower in the BRT group (21% vs 46%; P = .003). BRT patients had improved 2-year RFS (53% vs 44%; P = .023) and 2-year EFS (37% vs 34%; P = .039) compared with patients who did not receive BRT. The impact of BRT was most prominent in patients who had ≤2 pre-CART involved disease sites, with 2-year RFS of 62% in patients who received BRT compared with 42% in those who did not (P = .002). BRT before CART for patients with limited (<5 involved disease sites) R/R NHL improves response rate, local control, RFS, and EFS without causing significant toxicities.

Management of bone disease with concurrent chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma

In the intricate landscape of multiple myeloma, a hematologic malignancy of plasma cells, bone disease presents a pivotal and often debilitating complication. The emergence of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has marked a pivotal shift in the therapeutic landscape, offering novel avenues for the management of MM, particularly for those with relapsed or refractory disease. This innovative treatment modality not only targets malignant cells with precision but also influences the bone microenvironment, presenting both challenges and opportunities in patient care. In this comprehensive review, we aim to examine the multifaceted aspects of bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma and concurrent CAR-T therapy, highlighting its clinical ramifications and the latest advancements in diagnostic modalities and therapeutic interventions. The article aims to synthesize current understanding of the interplay between myeloma cells, CAR-T cells, and the bone microenvironment in the context of current treatment strategies in this challenging and unique patient population.

Prevalence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients at high-risk of failure after CAR T-cell therapy eligible for bridging radiation therapy

Background and purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) meeting high-risk criteria for early relapse after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy (CART) who have disease encompassable in a standard radiation therapy (RT) plan (defined as <5 malignant lesions) and may benefit from bridging RT prior to CD19 CART.

Materials and methods

This is a single-center, retrospective study of patients with R/R NHL who received CD19 CART from 2018 to 2022. Eligible patients had pre-apheresis radiologic studies available. All patients were classified by number of lesions and history of high-risk disease criteria: bulky disease ≥10 cm, ≥1 extranodal (EN) sites, LDH ≥normal, or ≥1 lesion with SUVmax ≥10.

Results

A total of 81 patients with R/R NHL were evaluated. Based on our definition, 40 (49%) patients would have been eligible for bridging RT, including 38 patients who met high-risk criteria: 31 with ≥1 EN site, 19 had ≥1 lesion with SUVmax ≥10, 16 with bulky disease, and 3 with elevated LDH. At 3 months after CART, ORRs in high-risk patients with <5 lesions, ≥5 lesions, and no lesions on pre-apheresis studies were 76% (CR 69%, PR 7%), 70% (CR 60%, PR 10%), and 80% (CR 80%), respectively.

Conclusion

Approximately 47% (38/81) of patients were classified as at high risk of relapse after CART with disease encompassable in a standard radiation plan and eligible for bridging RT studies.

Re-examining the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the era of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy

Historically, salvage chemoimmunotherapy with consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was the only potentially curative therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Treatment options were few and outcomes poor for patients whose lymphoma failed to respond to salvage chemotherapy/ASCT and for patients not eligible for ASCT. The approval of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory LBCL revolutionized the treatment landscape with unprecedented response rates and durability of responses. As a result, earlier intervention with CAR T-cell therapy has been explored, and the enthusiasm for CAR T-cell therapy has overshadowed ASCT. In this article, we will review the data available for ASCT and CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed LBCL and will examine the role for ASCT in relapsed/refractory LBCL in the era of CAR T-cell therapy.

Outcome and feasibility of radiotherapy bridging in large B-cell lymphoma patients receiving CD19 CAR T in the UK

Radiotherapy (RT) has potential synergistic effects with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T but is not widely used as bridging therapy due to logistical challenges and lack of standardised protocols. We analysed RT bridging in a multicentre national cohort of large B-cell lymphoma patients approved for 3L axicabtagene ciloleucel or tisagenlecleucel across 12 UK centres. Of 763 approved patients, 722 were leukapheresed, 717 had data available on bridging therapy. 169/717 (24%) received RT bridging, 129 as single modality and 40 as combined modality treatment (CMT). Of 169 patients, 65.7% had advanced stage, 36.9% bulky disease, 86.5% elevated LDH, 41.7% international prognostic index (IPI) ≥3 and 15.2% double/triple hit at the time of approval. Use of RT bridging varied from 11% to 32% between centres and increased over time. Vein-to-vein time and infusion rate did not differ between bridging modalities. RT-bridged patients had favourable outcomes with 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 56% for single modality and 47% for CMT (1-year PFS 43% for systemic bridging). This is the largest cohort of LBCL patients receiving RT bridging prior to CAR T reported to date. Our results show that RT bridging can be safely and effectively used even in advanced stage and high-risk disease, with low dropout rates and excellent outcomes.

Role of radiation in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Current studies and future prospects

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized the treatment approach for patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R NHL). However, the long-term prognosis has been discouraging. Moreover, the urgent resolution of two critical issues is necessary: minimize tumor burden before CAR-T infusion and control fatal toxicities post CAR-T therapy. By combining radiotherapy (RT), the safety and efficacy of CAR-T can be improved. RT can serve as bridging therapy, reducing the tumor burden before CAR-T infusion, thus enabling safe and successful CAR-T infusion, and as salvage therapy in cases of CAR-T therapy failure. This review aims to discuss the current evidence supporting the use of RT in CAR-T therapy for patients with R/R NHL. Although most studies have shown a positive role of RT in combined modality treatments for patients undergoing CAR-T therapy, the synergy gained from these remains uncertain. Furthermore, the optimal dose/fraction and radiation response require further investigation.

Combining Obinutuzumab With Radiation for Refractory DLBCL: Retrospective Safety and Efficacy Analysis

Purpose

Approximately 30% of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) will develop relapsed or treatment-refractory disease after primary chemotherapy. Patients unable to undergo aggressive chemotherapy and stem cell transplant or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy have limited treatment options. Here, we investigated the safety and efficacy of combining obinutuzumab with cytoreductive radiation to all areas of disease in patients with relapsed DLBCL.

Methods and Materials

A retrospective review of patients with treatment refractory DLBCL was performed. All patients were treated with external beam radiation to all sites of refractory disease with concurrent and adjuvant obinutuzumab. Toxicities were evaluated based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate progression-free survival and overall survival.

Results

Between 2016 and 2022, 7 patients with refractory DLBCL were treated with concurrent radiation and obinutuzumab. No grade 3 or greater treatment-related toxicity was observed. Four of the 7 patients had a complete response at the radiated site on first postradiation imaging. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 30 months.

Conclusions

In this small cohort of treatment-refractory patients with DLBCL, the combination of radiation and obinutuzumab was well tolerated without excessive treatment-related toxicity. The combination resulted in durable disease control with a prolonged overall survival without additional treatment in a subset of patients.

Utilizing red blood cell distribution width (RDW) as a reliable biomarker to predict treatment effects after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy is an effective treatment for B cell malignancies. A certain fraction of patients, however, experience post-CAR-T relapse, and due to the difficulty of precise relapse prediction, biomarkers that can predict the strength and duration of CAR-T efficacy are needed before CAR-T infusion. Therefore, we performed a single-center cohort study including 91 diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with CAR-T in order to identify such a new prognostic biomarker. After confirming that each of the already reported prognostic parameters (disease status at leukapheresis, primary refractoriness, number of treatment lines, CD3+ cell counts at leukapheresis) has only limited predictive performance, we established a new composite parameter by integrating these four variables, and found that it predicts progression-free survival (PFS) after CAR-T infusion with statistical significance. Moreover, after comprehensive correlation analyses of this new composite parameter with all individual laboratory variables, we determined that the standard deviation of red blood cell distribution width (RDW-SD) at leukapheresis shows significant correlation with the composite parameter and may be a prognostic biomarker (R2 = 0.76, p = 0.02). Validation analysis indicated that a higher RDW-SD is significantly associated with poorer PFS after CAR-T cell therapy (HR, 3.46, P = 0.03). Thus, this study suggests that a single parameter, RDW-SD at leukapheresis, is a novel, useful biomarker that can be obtained early to predict therapeutic effects of CAR-T cell therapy. Post-CAR-T maintenance or re-induction therapies should be adopted for higher risk patients, who may relapse after CAR-T therapy.

Efficient combination of radiotherapy and CAR-T - A systematic review

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, a groundbreaking immunotherapy. However, it faces formidable challenges in treating solid tumors, grappling with issues like poor trafficking, limited penetration, and insufficient persistence within the tumor microenvironment (TME). CAR-T cells are engineered to express receptors that target specific cancer antigens, enhancing their ability to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. This review paper explores the intricate interplay between CAR-T therapy and radiotherapy (RT), investigating their synergistic potential. Radiotherapy, a standard cancer treatment, involves using high doses of radiation to target and damage cancer cells, disrupting their ability to grow and divide. We highlight that RT modulates the TME, augments antigen presentation, and promotes immune cell infiltration, bolstering CAR-T cell-mediated tumor eradication. Molecular insights shed light on RT-induced alterations in tumor stroma, T cell recruitment promotion, and induction of immunogenic cell death. Noteworthy, strategies, such as combining hypofractionated radiotherapy with myeloid-derived suppressor cell blockade, underscore innovative approaches to enhance CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumors. Bridging indications for RT and CAR-T cells in hematological malignancies are discussed, emphasizing scenarios where RT strategically enhances CAR-T cell efficacy. The paper critically evaluates the RT as a bridge compared to traditional chemotherapy, highlighting timing and dosage considerations crucial for optimizing CAR-T therapy outcomes. In summary, the paper provides valuable insights into the intricate molecular mechanisms activated by RT and innovative strategies to improve CAR-T cell therapy, fostering a deeper understanding of their combined potential in cancer treatment.

Reducing and controlling metabolic active tumor volume prior to CAR T-cell infusion can improve survival outcomes in patients with large B-cell lymphoma

Bridging therapy before CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell infusion is frequently applied in patients with relapsed or refractory Large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL). This study aimed to assess the influence of quantified MATV and MATV-dynamics, between pre-apheresis (baseline) and pre-lymphodepleting chemotherapy (pre-LD) MATV, on CAR T-cell outcomes and toxicities in patients with r/r LBCL. MATVs were calculated semi-automatically at baseline (n = 74) and pre-LD (n = 68) in patients with r/r LBCL who received axicabtagene ciloleucel. At baseline, patients with a low MATV (< 190 cc) had a better time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) compared to high MATV patients (p < 0.001). High MATV patients who remained stable or reduced upon bridging therapy showed a significant improvement in TTP (p = 0.041) and OS (p = 0.015), compared to patients with a high pre-LD MATV (> 480 cc). Furthermore, high MATV baseline was associated with severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS, p = 0.001). In conclusion, patients with low baseline MATV had the best TTP/OS and effective reduction or controlling MATV during bridging improved survival outcomes in patients with a high baseline MATV, providing rationale for the use of more aggressive bridging regimens.

Incorporating radiation with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A multicenter consensus approach

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) has revolutionized the outcomes of relapsed and/or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, CART is still limited by its availability, toxicity, and response durability. Not all patients make it to the CART infusion phase due to disease progression. Among those who receive CART, a significant number of patients experience life-threatening cytokine release syndrome toxicity, and less than half maintain a durable response with the majority relapsing in pre-existing sites of disease present pre-CART. Radiation therapy stands as a promising peri-CART and salvage treatment that can improve the outcomes of these patients. Evidence suggests that bridging radiotherapy prior to CART controls the disease during the manufacturing period, augments response rates and local control, cytoreduces/debulks the disease and decreases the severity of cytokine release syndrome, and may prolong disease-free intervals and survival especially in patients with bulky disease. Consolidative radiotherapy for residual post-CART disease alters the pattern of relapse and improves local recurrence-free and progression-free survivals. Salvage radiotherapy for relapsed post-CART disease has favorable survival outcomes when delivered comprehensively for patients with limited relapsed disease and palliates symptoms for patients with diffuse relapsed disease. The biology of the disease during the peri-CART period is poorly understood, and further studies investigating the optimal timing and dosing of radiation therapy (RT) are needed. In this review, we tackle the most significant challenges of CART, review and propose how RT can help mitigate these challenges, and provide The Mayo Clinic experts' approach on incorporating RT with CART.

CD19-directed CAR T cells as first salvage therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: towards a rational approach

The approval of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for the second-line treatment of high-risk large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has greatly affected salvage algorithms for this condition, and such therapies could have the potential to improve the course of relapsed or refractory LBCL. In this Review, we provide guidance for a rational management approach to the use of commercial CD19-directed CAR T cells in the second-line treatment of LBCL, addressing crucial questions regarding eligible histologies; age, comorbidity, and tumour biology restrictions; the handling of very aggressive tumour behaviour; and holding and bridging therapies. The guidance was developed in a structured manner and, for each question, consists of a description of the clinical issue, a summary of the evidence, the rationale for a practical management approach, and recommendations. These recommendations could help to decide on the optimal management of patients with relapsed or refractory LBCL who are considered for second-line CAR T-cell treatment.

Very low-dose radiotherapy for extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT) is a rare cancer for which optimal treatment strategies are undefined. Retrospective analyses suggest excellent outcomes with surgical resection for localized BALT lymphoma; however, the role of radiotherapy remains underexplored. We report the largest-to-date single-center analysis of 13 primary BALT lymphoma patients treated with radiotherapy. Of 15 treated lesions, we report a 100% response rate with complete response (CR) achieved in 67% of lesions. Among 10 lesions treated with very low-dose radiotherapy (VLDRT; 4 Gray [Gy]), 6 (60%) achieved a CR; among 5 lesions treated with full-dose radiotherapy (24-36 Gy), 4 (80%) achieved a CR. There were no local recurrences. Only one patient, treated with 30 Gy, developed an acute grade 3/4 toxic effect. There were no events of radiation-induced secondary malignancies. Our institutional experience indicates that radiotherapy, including VLDRT, is a safe and effective treatment for primary BALT lymphoma.

Broadening the horizon: potential applications of CAR-T cells beyond current indications

Engineering immune cells to treat hematological malignancies has been a major focus of research since the first resounding successes of CAR-T-cell therapies in B-ALL. Several diseases can now be treated in highly therapy-refractory or relapsed conditions. Currently, a number of CD19- or BCMA-specific CAR-T-cell therapies are approved for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), multiple myeloma (MM), and follicular lymphoma (FL). The implementation of these therapies has significantly improved patient outcome and survival even in cases with previously very poor prognosis. In this comprehensive review, we present the current state of research, recent innovations, and the applications of CAR-T-cell therapy in a selected group of hematologic malignancies. We focus on B- and T-cell malignancies, including the entities of cutaneous and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (T-ALL, PTCL, CTCL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), classical Hodgkin-Lymphoma (HL), Burkitt-Lymphoma (BL), hairy cell leukemia (HCL), and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). While these diseases are highly heterogenous, we highlight several similarly used approaches (combination with established therapeutics, target depletion on healthy cells), targets used in multiple diseases (CD30, CD38, TRBC1/2), and unique features that require individualized approaches. Furthermore, we focus on current limitations of CAR-T-cell therapy in individual diseases and entities such as immunocompromising tumor microenvironment (TME), risk of on-target-off-tumor effects, and differences in the occurrence of adverse events. Finally, we present an outlook into novel innovations in CAR-T-cell engineering like the use of artificial intelligence and the future role of CAR-T cells in therapy regimens in everyday clinical practice.

CAR-T Cell Therapy in Large B Cell Lymphoma

Large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) are among the most frequent (about 30%) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Despite the aggressive behavior of these lymphomas, more than 60% of patients can be cured with first-line chemoimmunotherapy using the R-CHOP regimen. Patients with refractory or relapsing disease show a poor outcome even when treated with second-line therapies. CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells are emerging as an efficacious second-line treatment strategy for patients with LBCL. Three CD19-CAR-T-cell products received FDA and EMA approval. CAR-T cell therapy has also been explored for treating high-risk LBCL patients in the first-line setting and for patients with central nervous system involvement. Although CD19-CAR-T therapy has transformed the care of refractory/relapsed LBCL, about 60% of these patients will ultimately progress or relapse following CD19-CAR-T; therefore, it is fundamental to identify predictive criteria of response to CAR-T therapy and to develop salvage therapies for patients relapsing after CD19-CAR-T therapies. Moreover, ongoing clinical trials evaluate bispecific CAR-T cells targeting both CD19 and CD20 or CD19 and CD22 as a tool to improve the therapeutic efficacy and reduce the number of refractory/relapsing patients.

Intrinsic tumor resistance to CAR T cells is a dynamic transcriptional state that is exploitable with low-dose radiation

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy represents a major advancement for hematologic malignancies, with some patients achieving long-term remission. However, the majority of treated patients still die of their disease. A consistent predictor of response is tumor quantity, wherein a higher disease burden before CAR T-cell therapy portends a worse prognosis. Focal radiation to bulky sites of the disease can decrease tumor quantity before CAR T-cell therapy, but whether this strategy improves survival is unknown. We find that substantially reducing systemic tumor quantity using high-dose radiation to areas of bulky disease, which is commonly done clinically, is less impactful on overall survival in mice achieved by CAR T cells than targeting all sites of disease with low-dose total tumor irradiation (TTI) before CAR T-cell therapy. This finding highlights another predictor of response, tumor quality, the intrinsic resistance of an individual patient's tumor cells to CAR T-cell killing. Little is known about whether or how an individual tumor's intrinsic resistance may change under different circumstances. We find a transcriptional "death receptor score" that reflects a tumor's intrinsic sensitivity to CAR T cells can be temporarily increased by low-dose TTI, and the timing of this transcriptional change correlates with improved in vivo leukemia control by an otherwise limited number of CAR T cells. This suggests an actionable method for potentially improving outcomes in patients predicted to respond poorly to this promising therapy and highlights that intrinsic tumor attributes may be equally or more important predictors of CAR T-cell response as tumor burden.

Integrating CAR-T cell therapy into the management of DLBCL: what we are learning

INTRODUCTION

Chimeric Antigen Receptor ;(CAR) T cells therapies have become part of the standard of care for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The weakness of CAR-T therapies is that there are no comparative clinical trials, although many publications based on real-life data have confirmed the results obtained in pivotal studies. After several years of the commercialization of CAR-T, some points still need to be fully clarified. Healthcare professionals have questions about identifying patients who may benefit from therapy. There are aspects inherent in the accessibility of care related to improved relationships between CAR-T-delivering and referral centers.

AREAS COVERED

Open questions are inherent in the salvage and bridge therapy, predictive criteria for response and persistence of CAR-T after infusion. Managing toxicities remain a top priority and one of the points on which further knowledge is needed.

EXPERT OPINION

This review aims to describe the current landscape of CAR-T cells in DLBCL, outline their outcomes and toxicities, and explain the outstanding questions that remain to be addressed.

Reappraisal of the role of radiation therapy in lymphoma treatment

Radiation therapy (RT) for lymphomas has improved dramatically with modern imaging and treatment techniques, encompassing only the necessary volume with minimal doses to normal structures. Prescribed radiation doses are reduced, and fractionation schedules are under revision. With effective systemic treatment only initial macroscopic disease is irradiated. With no or less effective systemic treatment, possible microscopic disease is also included. Risks of long-term side effects of RT have diminished dramatically and should be weighed against risks from more systemic treatment or increased risk of relapse. Lymphoma patients are often elderly, they tolerate modern limited RT very well. Lymphomas refractory to systemic treatments often remain radioresponsive, and brief, mild RT may offer effective palliation. New roles for RT are emerging with immune therapies. RT for "bridging," keeping the lymphoma under control while waiting for immune therapy, is well established. Enhancement of the immune response to lymphomas, so-called "priming," is being intensively researched.