Clopidogrel did not inhibit platelet function early after coronary bypass surgery: A prospective randomized trial

Antithrombotic strategies for preventing graft failure in coronary artery bypass graft

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures face challenges related to graft failure, driven by factors such as acute thrombosis, neointimal hyperplasia, and atherosclerotic plaque formation. Despite extensive efforts over four decades, the optimal antithrombotic strategy to prevent graft occlusion while minimizing bleeding risks remains uncertain, relying heavily on expert opinions rather than definitive guidelines. To address this uncertainty, we conducted a review of randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses of antithrombotic therapy for patients with CABG. These studies examined various antithrombotic regimens in CABG such as single antiplatelet therapy (aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors), dual antiplatelet therapy, and anticoagulation therapy. We evaluated outcomes including the patency of grafts, major adverse cardiovascular events, and bleeding complications and also explored future perspectives to enhance long-term outcomes for CABG patients. Early studies established aspirin as a key component of antithrombotic pharmacotherapy after CABG. Subsequent randomized controlled trials focused on adding a P2Y12 inhibitor (such as clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel) to aspirin, yielding mixed results. This article aims to inform clinical decision-making and guide the selection of antithrombotic strategies after CABG.

CYP2C19 genotype and platelet aggregation test-guided dual antiplatelet therapy after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB). Clopidogrel is less effective among patients with loss-of-function (LoF) of CYP2C19 alleles, while ticagrelor has direct effects on P2Y₁₂ receptor. Whether a CYP2C19 genotype plus platelet aggregation test (PAgT)-guided DAPT after CABG could improve clinical outcomes remain uncertain.

Materials and methods

From August 2019 to December 2020, 1,134 consecutive patients who underwent OPCAB received DAPT for 1 year after surgery in Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. According to the actual treatment they received in real-world, 382 (33.7%) of them received a traditional DAPT: aspirin 100 mg qd + clopidogrel 75 mg qd, no matter the CYP2C19 genotype and response in platelet aggregation test (PAgT). The other 752 (66.3%) patients received an individual DAPT based on CYP2C19 genotype and PAgT: aspirin 100 mg qd + clopidogrel 75 mg qd if CYP2C19 was extensive metabolizer, or moderate metabolizer but normal response in PAgT; aspirin 100 mg qd + ticagrelor 90 mg bid if CYP2C19 was poor metabolizer, or moderate metabolizer but no or low response in PAgT. One-year follow-up was achieved for all patients. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The safety outcome was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) criteria major bleeding.

Results

Compared with the traditional DAPT group, the risk of MACE in the individual DAPT group was significantly lower (5.5 vs. 9.2%, HR 0.583; 95% CI, 0.371-0.915; P = 0.019), mainly due to the decreased risk of MI (1.7 vs. 4.2%, HR 0.407; 95% CI, 0.196-0.846; P = 0.016). The risk of TIMI major bleeding events was similar between the two groups (5.3 vs. 6.0%, RR 0.883; 95% CI, 0.537-1.453; P = 0.626).

Conclusion

For patients who underwent OPCAB, individual DAPT (CYP2C19 genotype plus PAgT-guided strategy) was associated with a lower risk of MACE and a similar risk of major bleeding.

Should dual antiplatelet therapy be used in patients following coronary artery bypass surgery? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

We assessed the effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post elective or urgent (i.e., post acute coronary syndrome [ACS]) coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Registry from inception to August 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults undergoing CABG comparing either dual vs. single antiplatelet therapy or higher- vs. lower-intensity DAPT were identified.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs (n = 4,887) with up to 1y follow-up were included. Five RCTs enrolled patients post-elective CABG (n = 986). Two multi-centre RCTs enrolled ACS patients who subsequently underwent CABG (n = 2,155). These 7 RCTs compared clopidogrel plus aspirin to aspirin alone. Two other multi-centre RCTs reported on ACS patients who subsequently underwent CABG comparing higher intensity DAPT with either ticagrelor (n = 1,261) or prasugrel (n = 485) plus aspirin to clopidogrel plus aspirin. Post-operative anti-platelet therapy was started when chest tube bleeding was no longer significant, typically within 24-48 h. There were no differences in all-cause mortality in clopidogrel plus aspirin vs. aspirin RCTs; conversely, all-cause mortality was significantly lower in ticagrelor and prasugrel vs. clopidogrel RCTs (risk ratio[RR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval[CI] 0.33-0.71, p = 0.0002; 2 RCTs, n = 1695; I(2)  = 0%; interaction p < 0.01 compared to clopidogrel plus aspirin vs aspirin RCTs). There were no differences in myocardial infarctions, strokes, or composite outcomes. Overall, major bleeding was not significantly increased (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.81-2.10, p = 0.27; 7 RCTs, n = 4500). There was heterogeneity (I(2)   = 42%) due almost entirely to higher bleeding reported for the prasugrel RCT which included mainly CABG-related major bleeding (RR 3.15, 95% CI 1.45-6.87, p = 0.004; 1 RCT, n = 437).

CONCLUSIONS

Most RCT data for DAPT post CABG is derived from subgroups of ACS patients in DAPT RCTs requiring CABG who resume DAPT post-operatively. Limited RCT data with heterogeneous trial designs suggest that higher intensity (prasugrel or ticagrelor) but not lower intensity (clopidogrel) DAPT is associated with an approximate 50% lower mortality in ACS patients who underwent CABG based on post-randomization subsets from single RCTs. Large prospective RCTs evaluating the use of DAPT post-CABG are warranted to provide more definitive guidance for clinicians.

Randomized trial of aspirin and clopidogrel versus aspirin alone for the prevention of coronary artery bypass graft occlusion: the Preoperative Aspirin and Postoperative Antiplatelets in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting study

BACKGROUND

Routine use of postoperative aspirin after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reduces graft failure and cardiovascular events. The efficacy and safety of adding clopidogrel to aspirin for the prevention of graft failure and cardiovascular events after CABG are unknown. We performed a pilot study measuring safety and efficacy outcomes of aspirin and clopidogrel therapy after CABG.

METHODS

We randomized 100 patients undergoing CABG to receive placebo or clopidogrel started after surgery and for 30 days. All patients received aspirin 81 mg daily. Graft patency was measured by cardiac computed tomography angiography at 30 days.

RESULTS

Clinical follow-up was complete for 99 patients, and 79 (80%) underwent computed tomography angiography. The proportion of patients with ≥1 occluded graft was not significantly different between placebo and clopidogrel groups (9/39 [23.1%] vs 7/40 [17.5%], relative risk 0.95, 95% CI 0.80-1.14, P=.54). Among radial artery grafts, the placebo group had a significantly higher number of occlusions or "string signs" compared with the clopidogrel group (7/16 [43.8%] vs 2/19 [10.5%], relative risk 0.24, 95% CI 0.06-1.00, P=.05). There was no difference between placebo and clopidogrel groups in the safety outcomes of total postoperative bleeding, transfusions, bleeding events, and reexploration and in the efficacy outcomes of nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and death.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study confirms a high rate of graft occlusion after CABG surgery and suggests that the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin is feasible and safe and may be superior for prevention of graft failure in radial artery grafts.

Thienopyridine derivatives versus aspirin for preventing stroke and other serious vascular events in high vascular risk patients

BACKGROUND

Aspirin is the most widely studied and prescribed antiplatelet agent for preventing serious vascular events, reducing the odds of such events among high vascular risk patients by about a quarter. Thienopyridine derivatives inhibit platelet activation by a different mechanism and so may be more effective.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of thienopyridine derivatives (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) versus aspirin for preventing serious vascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or vascular death) in patients at high risk, and specifically in patients with a previous TIA or ischaemic stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the trials registers of the Stroke, Heart and Peripheral Vascular Diseases Cochrane Review Groups (last searched July 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to August 2008). We also searched reference lists of relevant papers, and contacted other researchers and the pharmaceutical company Sanofi-BMS (December 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All unconfounded, double blind, randomised trials directly comparing a thienopyridine derivative with aspirin in high vascular risk patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We sought additional data from the principal investigators of the largest trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 trials involving 26,865 high vascular risk patients. The trials were generally of high quality. Aspirin was compared with ticlopidine in nine trials (7633 patients) and with clopidogrel in one trial (19,185 patients). Compared with aspirin, allocation to a thienopyridine produced a modest, just statistically significant, reduction in the odds of a serious vascular event (11.6% versus 12.5%; odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 0.99), corresponding to the avoidance of 10 (95% CI 0 to 20) serious vascular events per 1000 patients treated for about two years. However, the wide confidence interval includes the possibility of negligible additional benefit. Compared with aspirin, thienopyridines significantly reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects. However, thienopyridines increased the odds of skin rash and diarrhoea, ticlopidine more than clopidogrel. Allocation to ticlopidine, but not clopidogrel, significantly increased the odds of neutropenia. In patients with TIA/ischaemic stroke, the results were similar to those for all patients combined.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The thienopyridine derivatives are at least as effective as aspirin in preventing serious vascular events in patients at high risk, and possibly somewhat more so. However, the size of any additional benefit is uncertain and could be negligible. Clopidogrel has a more favourable adverse effects profile than ticlopidine and so is the thienopyridine of choice. It should be used as an alternative to aspirin in patients genuinely intolerant of or allergic to aspirin.

Evidence for using clopidogrel alone or in addition to aspirin in post coronary artery bypass surgery patients

Clopidogrel is recommended with aspirin for patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after non-ST elevation myocardial infarctions. Cardiothoracic surgeons widely use clopidogrel in addition to aspirin for post-CABG patients, including those with stable coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to systematically review the published research to determine whether clopidogrel use after CABG is based on good trial data. Studies reporting safety and/or efficacy data for clopidogrel use with or without aspirin after on- or off-pump CABG were included. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 11 were reported trials and 3 are ongoing trials. Subgroup retrospective analyses of previously reported large trials of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (n = 1) or patients with stable coronary artery disease (n = 3) did not show a clear clinical benefit of clopidogrel when given in addition to aspirin after CABG. In contrast, there was a trend toward increased major and minor bleeding after the use of clopidogrel plus aspirin. Two small prospective trials providing data on surrogate end points and 5 small trials involving off-pump CABG patients were not of good quality to draw meaningful conclusions. In conclusion, summarized data based on subgroup analyses, surrogate end points, and observational cohort studies fail to demonstrate a clear beneficial effect of clopidogrel alone or in combination with aspirin on clinical outcomes after CABG.

Simultaneous "hybrid" percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive surgical bypass grafting: feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes

Surgical and percutaneous coronary artery intervention revascularization are traditionally considered isolated options. A simultaneous hybrid approach may allow an opportunity to match the best strategy for a particular anatomic lesion. Concerns regarding safety and feasibility of such an approach exist. We examined the safety, feasibility, and early outcomes of a simultaneous hybrid revascularization strategy (minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting of the left anterior descending [LAD] artery and drug-eluting stent [DES] to non-LAD lesions) in 13 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease that underwent left internal mammary artery to LAD minimally invasive direct coronary bypass performed through a lateral thoracotomy, followed by stenting of non-LAD lesions, in a fluoroscopy-equipped operating room. Assessment of coagulation parameters was also undertaken. Inhospital and postdischarge outcomes of these patients were compared to a group of 26 propensity score matched parallel controls that underwent standard off-pump coronary artery bypass. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. All hybrid patients were successfully treated with DES and no inhospital mortality occurred in either group. Hybrid patients had a shorter length of stay (3.6 +/- 1.5 vs 6.3 +/- 2.3 days, P < .0001) and intubation times (0.5 +/- 1.3 vs 11.7 +/- 9.6 hours, P < .02). Despite aggressive anticoagulation and confirmed platelet inhibition, hybrid patients had less blood loss (581 +/- 402 vs 1242 +/- 941 mL, P < .05) and decreased transfusions (0.33 +/- 0.49 vs 1.47 +/- 1.53 U, P < .01). Six-month angiographic vessel patency and major adverse cardiac events were similar in the hybrid and off-pump coronary artery bypass groups. A simultaneous hybrid approach consisting of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with left internal mammary artery to LAD combined with revascularization of the remaining coronary targets using percutaneous coronary artery intervention with DES is a feasible option accomplished with acceptable clinical outcomes without increased bleeding risk.

Cardiac Surgery in Patients with Drug Eluting Stents: The Risk of Stopping Clopidogrel

Recommendations for the duration of clopidogrel (Plavix®, Bristol Meyers Squibb, New York, NY) therapy following drug eluting stent (DES) insertion have been subject to recent criticism. Suggested recommendations for the continuation of clopidogrel have been extended to one year following DES insertion. However, patients with a previously inserted DES who now require cardiac surgery are requested to stop clopidogrel perioperatively. The safety of this practice is unclear. We report two cases of elective cardiac surgical intervention after the insertion of DES complicated by perioperative or intraoperative acute coronary ischemia attributed to DES closure.

Dose-Related Efficacy of Aspirin After Coronary Surgery in Patients With PlA2 Polymorphism (NCT00262275)

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the impact of the genetic polymorphisms affecting aspirin response using platelet aggregation and the response to different aspirin doses after cardiopulmonary bypass, we performed a subanalysis of the results from a randomized trial evaluating low- and medium-dose aspirin and clopidogrel.

METHODS

Blood was collected from consenting patients and DNA extracted. Polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis was performed to detect Pl(A2), C807T, and A842/C50T polymorphisms. Aspirin efficacy was assessed using light transmission platelet aggregometry, and reported as percentage aggregation and EC50 concentrations using the technique of Born.

RESULTS

Of 90 patients, 80 consented to further genetic testing, of whom 63 patients were randomly assigned to medium- (325 mg) or low-dose (100 mg) aspirin. The Pl(A2), C807T, and A842/C50T gene frequencies were 30%, 66%, and 21%, respectively, with no identifiable differences in the baseline platelet aggregation. Postoperatively, after 5 days of aspirin, platelet aggregation was consistently but not significantly impaired with Pl(A2) and A842/C50T carriers and consistently but not significantly improved with C50T carriers. An interaction term was identified on percentage aggregation and EC50 using epinephrine. The interaction coefficient describes a higher aggregation of 19% (95% confidence interval: 2 to 36; p = 0.03) and less inhibition with an EC50 of -2.07 (-4.19 to 0.04; p = 0.06) in patients who were both Pl(A2) positive and receiving low-dose aspirin.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic polymorphisms that affect the response to aspirin are common. The impaired response of persons with the Pl(A2) polymorphism to aspirin may be dose related, with significant improvement observed in patients using medium- rather than low-dose aspirin.

Drug Insight: clopidogrel nonresponsiveness

Platelet reactivity to agonists and subsequent activation are important factors that affect the development of atherothrombosis and resultant ischemic events. Pharmacologic intervention with clopidogrel and aspirin during acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention is considered the gold standard for attenuating platelet activation and aggregation. Despite significant benefits reported with dual antiplatelet treatment in major clinical trials, the occurrence of adverse ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, remains a serious clinical problem. Nonresponsiveness, also called resistance, to current clopidogrel regimens might play a part in the occurrence of ischemic events. Various mechanisms have been implicated in nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel, including variability in intestinal absorption and hepatic conversion to the active metabolite, drug-drug interactions and receptor polymorphisms. Increased loading and maintenance doses and the use of new and more-potent P2Y12-receptor blockers might overcome the phenomenon of clopidogrel nonresponsiveness. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive and current review of clopidogrel response variability and nonresponsiveness.

Antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery

PURPOSE

To review the perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery, including the management of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and off-pump surgery.

METHODS

A review of the relevant English literature over the period 1975-2005 was undertaken, in addition to a review of international practices in antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Cardiopulmonary bypass is required in most procedures and makes anticoagulation mandatory. Anticoagulation is, usually, achieved with unfractionnated heparin (UFH). Unfractionated heparin is monitored by point-of-care (POC) testing, such as the activated clotting time or the determination of heparin concentration. The target values of both tests remain empirical, with no clearly validated thresholds. The target value needs to be adjusted according to the POC test, given significant variations between devices and activators. After CABG, the need for antiplatelet therapy is well demonstrated, in order to limit the risk of postoperative death or ischemic events, and improve venous graft patency. Immediately after valvular surgery, antithrombotic therapy should take into account the specific risk carried by each patient and by each prosthetic device. The risk of venous thromboembolism, though poorly defined, is also present in the postoperative period and may require additional attention. Given the frequent exposure to UFH, occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is not infrequent in these patients and requires careful individual management.

CONCLUSIONS

Antithrombotic therapy is an essential component of cardiac surgery. Yet, with the exception of antiplatelet agents in CABG patients, antithrombotic therapy is often based on the clinical experience of medical teams more than on an evidence-based assessment of the literature.

Biological efficacy of low versus medium dose aspirin after coronary surgery: results from a randomized trial [NCT00262275]

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effect of aspirin after coronary surgery is established; however, a recent study reported the inability of low doses (100 mg) to inhibit postoperative platelet function. We conducted a double-blind randomised trial to establish the efficacy of low dose aspirin and to compare it against medium dose aspirin.

METHODS

Patients undergoing coronary surgery were invited to participate and consenting patients were randomised to 100 mg or 325 mg of aspirin daily for 5 days. Our primary outcome was the difference in platelet aggregation (day 5 - baseline) using 1 microg/ml of collagen. Secondary outcomes were differences in EC50 of collagen, ADP and epinephrine (assessed using the technique of Born).

RESULTS

From September 2002 to April 2004, 72 patients were randomised; 3 patients discontinued, leaving 35 and 34 in the low and medium dose aspirin arms respectively. The mean aggregation (using 1.1 microg/ml of collagen) was reduced in both the medium and low dose aspirin arms by 37% and 36% respectively. The baseline adjusted difference (low - medium) was 6% (95% CI -3 to 14; p = 0.19). The directions of the results for the differences in EC50 (low - medium) were consistent for collagen, ADP and epinephrine at -0.07 (-0.53 to 0.40), -0.08 (-0.28 to 0.11) and -4.41 (-10.56 to 1.72) respectively, but none were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to recent findings, low dose aspirin is effective and medium dose aspirin did not prove superior for inhibiting platelet aggregation after coronary surgery.