Coronary Angiography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography for Guiding of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Results from multiple randomized clinical trials comparing outcomes after intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- and optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with invasive coronary angiography (ICA)-guided PCI as well as a pivotal trial comparing the 2 intravascular imaging (IVI) techniques have provided mixed results.

METHODS

Major electronic databases were searched to identify eligible trials evaluating at least 2 PCI guidance strategies among ICA, IVUS, and OCT. The 2 coprimary outcomes were target lesion revascularization and myocardial infarction. The secondary outcomes included ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, death, cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, and major adverse cardiac events. Frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses were conducted. The results were replicated by Bayesian random-effects models. Pairwise meta-analyses of the direct components, multiple sensitivity analyses, and pairwise meta-analyses IVI versus ICA were supplemented.

RESULTS

The results from 24 randomized trials (15 489 patients: IVUS versus ICA, 46.4%, 7189 patients; OCT versus ICA, 32.1%, 4976 patients; OCT versus IVUS, 21.4%, 3324 patients) were included in the network meta-analyses. IVUS was associated with reduced target lesion revascularization compared with ICA (odds ratio [OR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.54-0.87]), whereas no significant differences were observed between OCT and ICA (OR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63-1.09]) and OCT and IVUS (OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.88-1.66]). Myocardial infarction did not significantly differ between guidance strategies (IVUS versus ICA: OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.70-1.19]; OCT versus ICA: OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.68-1.11]; OCT versus IVUS: OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.69-1.33]). These results were consistent with the secondary outcomes of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, and sensitivity analyses generally did not reveal inconsistency. OCT was associated with a significant reduction of stent thrombosis compared with ICA (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.26-0.92]) but only in the frequentist analysis. Similarly, the results in terms of survival between IVUS or OCT and ICA were uncertain across analyses. A total of 25 randomized trials (17 128 patients) were included in the pairwise meta-analyses IVI versus ICA where IVI guidance was associated with reduced target lesion revascularization, cardiac death, and stent thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

IVI-guided PCI was associated with a reduction in ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization compared with ICA-guided PCI, with the difference most evident for IVUS. In contrast, no significant differences in myocardial infarction were observed between guidance strategies.

Antithrombotic strategies for preventing graft failure in coronary artery bypass graft

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures face challenges related to graft failure, driven by factors such as acute thrombosis, neointimal hyperplasia, and atherosclerotic plaque formation. Despite extensive efforts over four decades, the optimal antithrombotic strategy to prevent graft occlusion while minimizing bleeding risks remains uncertain, relying heavily on expert opinions rather than definitive guidelines. To address this uncertainty, we conducted a review of randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses of antithrombotic therapy for patients with CABG. These studies examined various antithrombotic regimens in CABG such as single antiplatelet therapy (aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors), dual antiplatelet therapy, and anticoagulation therapy. We evaluated outcomes including the patency of grafts, major adverse cardiovascular events, and bleeding complications and also explored future perspectives to enhance long-term outcomes for CABG patients. Early studies established aspirin as a key component of antithrombotic pharmacotherapy after CABG. Subsequent randomized controlled trials focused on adding a P2Y12 inhibitor (such as clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel) to aspirin, yielding mixed results. This article aims to inform clinical decision-making and guide the selection of antithrombotic strategies after CABG.

Association of trial characteristics with simultaneous publication and its impact on citations and mentions: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Randomized trials are often presented at medical conferences and published simultaneously or later. Predictors of simultaneous publication and its consequences are undetermined. Our aim was to characterize the practice of simultaneous publication, identify its predictors, and evaluate its impact.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we included randomized trials presented at late-breaking science sessions of major cardiovascular conferences from 2015 to 2021. The association of trial characteristics with the timing of publication was analyzed. The impact of simultaneous vs nonsimultaneous publication was investigated on the number of 1-year citations and 1-month mentions, and the total citations and mentions at the longest observation follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 478 trials included in the analysis, 48.7% were published simultaneously. Simultaneous publications were more likely to be presented in the main conference room (OR, 6.09; 95%CI, 1.34-36.92; P=.029) and were characterized by a shorter review time (OR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.91-0.96; P<.001). Simultaneous publications were associated with higher 1-year citations (R2, 43.81; 95%CI, 23.89-63.73; P<.001), 1-month mentions (R2, 132.32; 95%CI, 85.42-179.22; P<.001) and total citations (R2, 222.89; 95%CI, 127.98-317.80; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized trials presented in the main conference room and with shorter review time were more likely to be published simultaneously. Simultaneous publications were associated with more citations and mentions than nonsimultaneous publications.

Percutaneous interventions for pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) ranks as a leading cause of in-hospital mortality and the third most common cause of cardiovascular death. The spectrum of PE manifestations varies widely, making it difficult to determine the best treatment approach for specific patients. Conventional treatment options include anticoagulation, thrombolysis, or surgery, but emerging percutaneous interventional procedures are being investigated for their potential benefits in heterogeneous PE populations. These novel interventional techniques encompass catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and hybrid approaches combining different mechanisms. Furthermore, inferior vena cava filters are also available as an option for PE prevention. Such interventions may offer faster improvements in right ventricular function, as well as in pulmonary and systemic haemodynamics, in individual patients. Moreover, percutaneous treatment may be a valid alternative to traditional therapies in high bleeding risk patients and could potentially reduce the burden of mortality related to major bleeds, such as that of haemorrhagic strokes. Nevertheless, the safety and efficacy of these techniques compared to conservative therapies have not been conclusively established. This review offers a comprehensive evaluation of the current evidence for percutaneous interventions in PE and provides guidance for selecting appropriate patients and treatments. It serves as a valuable resource for future researchers and clinicians seeking to advance this field. Additionally, we explore future perspectives, proposing "percutaneous primary pulmonary intervention" as a potential paradigm shift in the field.

Pharmacological and Clinical Appraisal of Factor XI Inhibitor Drugs

The evolution of anticoagulation therapy, from vitamin K antagonists to the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) almost two decades ago, marks significant progress. Despite improved safety demonstrated in pivotal trials and post-marketing observations, persistent concerns exist, particularly regarding bleeding risk and the absence of therapeutic indications in specific subgroups or clinical contexts. Factor XI (FXI) has recently emerged as a pivotal contributor to intraluminal thrombus formation and growth, playing a limited role in sealing vessel wall injuries. Inhibiting FXI presents an opportunity to decouple thrombosis from hemostasis, addressing concerns related to bleeding events while safeguarding against thromboembolic events. Notably, FXI inhibition holds promise for patients with end-stage renal disease or cancer, where clear indications for DOACs are currently lacking. Various compounds have undergone design, testing, and progression to phase 2 clinical trials, demonstrating a generally favorable safety and tolerability profile. However, validation through large-scale phase 3 trials with sufficient power to assess both safety and efficacy outcomes is needed. This review comprehensively examines FXI inhibitors, delving into individual classes, exploring their pharmacological properties, evaluating the latest evidence from randomized trials, and offering insights into future perspectives.

PCSK9 inhibitors: current status and emerging frontiers in lipid control

INTRODUCTION

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a leading cause of global mortality, imposing substantial healthcare economic burdens. Among the modifiable risk factors, hypercholesterolemia, especially elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), plays a pivotal role in ASCVD development. Novel therapies such as PCSK9 (Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9) inhibitors are emerging to address this concern. These inhibitors offer the potential to reduce ASCVD risk by directly targeting LDL-C levels.

AREAS COVERED

The article reviews the structural and functional aspects of PCSK9, highlighting its role in LDL receptor regulation. The pharmacological strategies for PCSK9 inhibition, including monoclonal antibodies, binding peptides, gene silencing, and active immunization, are explored. Clinical evidence from various trials underscores the safety and efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitors in reducing LDL-C levels and potentially improving cardiovascular outcomes. Despite these promising results, challenges such as cost-effectiveness and long-term safety considerations are addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

Among PCSK9 inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies represent a cornerstone. Many trials have showed their efficacy in reducing LDL-C and the risk for major adverse clinical events, revealing long-lasting effects, with special benefits particularly for statin-intolerant and familial hypercholesterolemia patients. However, long-term impacts, high costs, and patient selection necessitate further research.

A review of polypills for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a prevalent chronic condition managed through pharmacotherapy targeting modifiable risk factors. However, ASCVD patients often face poor medication adherence due to a high pill burden from multiple oral drugs, contributing to cardiovascular events. Recent evidence indicates that polypills combining antihypertensive and statin medications effectively control risk factors and improve adherence in various ASCVD risk patients. Randomized clinical trials demonstrate polypill efficacy in reducing major cardiovascular events, making them a convenient strategy for both established ASCVD patients and those without ASCVD. These positive results encourage the incorporation of polypills into comprehensive cardiovascular prevention programs, particularly for socio-economically vulnerable populations. Nevertheless, barriers remain, such as unclear regulatory approval pathways and physician hesitancy. Despite challenges, the benefits of fixed-dose combinations are evident and should be encouraged for secondary and primary prevention, especially in high-risk categories. Technological advancements could further support the successful integration of polypills in clinical practice. This review discusses the evidence, challenges, and perspectives of polypills, emphasizing their potential impact on cardiovascular disease management.

Antithrombotic Therapy for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Stroke is a devastating condition with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Antithrombotic therapy plays a crucial role in both primary and secondary prevention of stroke events. Single or dual antiplatelet therapy is generally preferred in cases of large-artery atherosclerosis and small-vessel disease, whereas anticoagulation is recommended in conditions of blood stasis or hypercoagulable states that mostly result in red thrombi. However, the benefit of antithrombotic therapies must be weighed against the increased risk of bleeding, which can pose significant challenges in the pharmacological management of this condition. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the currently available evidence on antithrombotic therapy for ischemic stroke and outlines an updated therapeutic algorithm to support physicians in tailoring the strategy to the individual patient and the underlying mechanism of stroke.

Complete Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Acute Coronary Syndromes With Multivessel Coronary Disease: A Systematic Review

Multivessel disease (MVD) affects approximately 50% of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and is significantly burdened by poor outcomes and high mortality. It represents a clinical challenge in patient management and decision making and subtends an evolving research area related to the pathophysiology of unstable plaques and local or systemic inflammation. The benefits of complete revascularization are established in hemodynamically stable ACS patients with MVD, and guidelines provide some reference points to inform clinical practice, based on an evidence level that is solid for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and less robust for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. However, several areas of uncertainty remain, such as the optimal timing for complete revascularization or the best guiding strategy for intermediate stenoses. We performed a systematic review of current evidence in the field of percutaneous revascularization in ACS and MVD, also including future perspectives from ongoing trials that will directly compare different timing strategies and investigate the role of invasive and noninvasive guidance techniques. (Complete percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease; CRD42022383123).

Eligibility to Intensified Antithrombotic Regimens for Secondary Prevention in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) and intensified antithrombotic regimens (prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT] or dual pathway inhibition [DPI]) are recommended for secondary prevention in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after initial DAPT. We aimed to characterize eligibility to such strategies and to explore to what extent guidelines are applied in clinical practice. Patients who underwent PCI for acute or chronic coronary syndrome who completed initial DAPT were analyzed from a prospective registry. Patients were categorized into SAPT, prolonged DAPT/DPI, or DPI groups as per guideline indication by using a risk stratification algorithm. Predictors of receiving intensified regimens and the divergency of practice from guidelines were investigated. Between October 2019 and September 2021, a total of 819 patients were included. Based on the guidelines, 83.7% of patients qualified for SAPT, 9.6% for any intensified regimen (i.e., prolonged DAPT or DPI), and 6.7% for DPI only. At multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to receive an intensified regimen if they had diabetes, dyslipidemia, peripheral artery disease, multivessel disease, or previous myocardial infarction. Conversely, they were less likely to receive an intensified regimen if they had atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, or previous stroke. Guidelines were not followed in 18.3% of cases. In particular, only 14.3% of candidates to intensified regimens were treated accordingly. In conclusion, although the majority of patients who underwent PCI after the initial period of DAPT were eligible for SAPT, 1 out of 6 had an indication to intensified regimens. However, such intensified regimens were underused among eligible patients.

Pharmacology and Clinical Development of Factor XI Inhibitors

Therapeutic anticoagulation is indicated for a variety of circumstances and conditions in several fields of medicine to prevent or treat venous and arterial thromboembolism. According to the different mechanisms of action, the available parenteral and oral anticoagulant drugs share the common principle of hampering or blocking key steps of the coagulation cascade, which unavoidably comes at the price of an increased propensity to bleed. Hemorrhagic complications affect patient prognosis both directly and indirectly (ie, by preventing the adoption of an effective antithrombotic strategy). Inhibition of factor XI (FXI) has emerged as a strategy with the potential to uncouple the pharmacological effect and the adverse events of anticoagulant therapy. This observation is based on the differential contribution of FXI to thrombus amplification, in which it plays a major role, and hemostasis, in which it plays an ancillary role in final clot consolidation. Several agents were developed to inhibit FXI at different stages (ie, suppressing biosynthesis, preventing zymogen activation, or impeding the biological action of the active form), including antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, small synthetic molecules, natural peptides, and aptamers. Phase 2 studies of different classes of FXI inhibitors in orthopedic surgery suggested that dose-dependent reductions in thrombotic complications are not paralleled by dose-dependent increases in bleeding compared with low-molecular-weight heparin. Likewise, the FXI inhibitor asundexian was associated with lower rates of bleeding compared with the activated factor X inhibitor apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation, although no evidence of a therapeutic effect on stroke prevention is available so far. FXI inhibition could also be appealing for patients with other conditions, including end-stage renal disease, noncardioembolic stroke, or acute myocardial infarction, for which other phase 2 studies have been conducted. The balance between thromboprophylaxis and bleeding achieved by FXI inhibitors needs confirmation in large-scale phase 3 clinical trials powered for clinical end points. Several of such trials are ongoing or planned to define the role of FXI inhibitors in clinical practice and to clarify which FXI inhibitor may be most suited for each clinical indication. This article reviews the rationale, pharmacology, results of medium or small phase 2 studies, and future perspectives of drugs inhibiting FXI.

Advances in the available pharmacotherapy for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation

INTRODUCTION

Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), including non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina, represent a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with important socio-economic consequences. NSTEMI accounts for the majority of acute coronary syndromes and usually develops on the background of a nonocclusive thrombus. We searched for relevant literature in the field in PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov as of July 2022.

AREAS COVERED

A number of pharmacotherapies are currently available for treatment and secondary prevention, mainly including antithrombotic, lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory drugs. Pretreatment with aspirin, anticoagulant and statin therapy is of key importance in the preprocedural phase, while pretreating with an oral P2Y12 inhibitor is not routinely indicated in patients undergoing early invasive management. For patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization, pharmacotherapy essentially consists of antithrombotic drugs, which should be carefully selected. Finally, antithrombotic, lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory drugs are important components of long-term secondary prevention after a NSTE-ACS.

EXPERT OPINION

This article reviews the evidence supporting recommendation on pharmacotherapy in patients presenting with a NSTE-ACS. Several randomized clinical trials are still ongoing and are expected to further inform scientific knowledge and clinical practice, with the final aim to improve the treatment of NSTE-ACS patients.

650 LARGE THROMBUS BURDEN: IS THERE STILL A ROLE FOR GPI?

Background

A number of clinical trials documented clinical benefits of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The advantage of reducing thrombotic burden at the cost of a higher risk of bleeding has been evaluated in different studies. However, data regarding the use of GPIs as peri-interventional treatment is lacking. Indeed, in current European guidelines GPIs may only be considered in specific ‘bail-out’ situations including high intraprocedural thrombus burden, slow flow, or no-flow with closure of the stented coronary vessel. The REPLACE-2 (Randomised Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events 2) trial showed that the outcome with bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade is similar to that of UFH plus planned GP IIb/IIIa inhibition during PCI. Moreover, the use of GPIs as bridge to elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) planned after unsuccessful urgent PCI in patients with NSTE-ACS has never been evaluated.

Clinical case

A 67-year-old man with multiple risk factors (hypertension, smoking and dyslipidemia) and history of coronary artery disease (CAD) was referred for acute chest pain and 27179 ng/L high-sensitivity-cardiac troponine (HS-cTn) at laboratory testing. The echocardiogram showed inferior and lateral wall hypokinesis with an inspective left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40%. Therefore, the patient was conducted in the cath-lab and a coronary angiography was performed showing a thrombotic occlusion of proximal right coronary artery (RCA) due to a large thrombus burden. Then, an urgent PCI was indicated. Different guidewires was unsuccessfully attempted to pass throughout the lesion on the proximal segment of the vessel. Eventually, the patient was monitored in intensive care unit and it was decided to administer a continuous infusion of tirofiban for 48 hours to reduce the thrombus burden. During these two days an improvement of the clinical status, a reduction of HS-cTn and an increase in terms of LVEF were observed. At the end the patient underwent to new invasive coronary angiography that demonstrated significant changes of the thrombus burden translating into plaque modification. A PCI was attempted again. The guidewire reached the distal part of the RCA and 1 DES 3.5/28 mm was implanted with consequent optimal angiographic result.

Conclusion

In the era of potent and faster acting P2Y12-inhibitors like prasugrel and ticagrelor, the benefit and, more importantly, the safety of GPI, remains discussed. In the current European guidelines on revascularization, GPIs infusion should be considered for bail out with evidence of no-reflow or thrombotic periprocedural complication (Class IIa, level of evidence C). This clinical case shows the potential benefit of administrating GPIs as bridge to PCI in selected patients. Patients with an occluded infarct-related artery and large thrombus burden could benefit from GPIs infusion facilitating PCI.

647 COMPLEX PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN HIGHT BLEEDING AND THROMBOTIC RISK PATIENT: WHICH ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY?

Background

Antiplatelet therapy is required in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). Current European and American guidelines recommend 6 months of DAPT in CCS and 12 months after ACS. However, a shorter duration of DAPT may be considered in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients, and a longer duration in those at higher thrombotic risk (HTR). To minimize the risk of thrombotic and bleeding events of an individual patient and therefore improve the overall outcomes of PCI, risk stratification is essential. In particular, bleeding and thrombotic characteristics must be weighed on a case-by-case basis to tailor antiplatelet therapy strategies and decisions over a patient's individual risk profile. We describe an illustrative case of complex PCI in patient with ACS in which defining the appropriate duration of DAPT is a clinical challenge.

Clinical case

A 68-year-old man with ACS-NSTEMI and anemia was hospitalized in intensive care unit. His medical history was notable for hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A transthoracic echocardiogram showed left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% with diffuse hypokinesia, without relevant valvular disease. He was conducted to the cath-lab for a diagnostic coronary angiogram which showed a three-vessel critical CAD. After Heart Team evaluation coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) was indicated. However, during the hospitalization in intensive care unit there was a worsening of clinical conditions with cognitive impairment due to mesencephalic stroke leading to a new Heart Team assessment that indicated PCI after stabilization of clinical scenario. After two weeks patient was conducted to the cath-lab to undergoing an IVUS guided PCI. PCI of the right coronary artery was performed with implantation of 1 DES (3.0/30 mm) on the middle segment and 1 DES (4.0/15 mm) on the ostial segment. PCI of the left main bifurcation was performed with implantation of 2 DES (4.0/28 mm) with culotte technique. Patients have both HBR and HTR, therefore, after procedure, the new trade off model score introduced by the Academic Research Consoritum (ARC) was applied. Based on his risk factor, the predicted 1-y risk of BARC type 3 to 5 bleeding (51.41%) was greater than the predicted 1-y risk of myocardial infarction or stroke (25.00%). Based on this result we decided to prescribe Triple antithrombotic therapy for 1 week, dual antithrombotic therapy for 12 months and after only oral anticoagulation.

Conclusion

In the context of patient with several risk factor undergoing complex PCI the stratification of bleeding and thrombotic individual risk is mandatory to define the appropriate duration of DAPT. The new trade-off model score is an important useful tool to identify patients who might benefit from individualized DAPT durations depending on the balance between HBR and HTR characteristics.

289 DIAGNOSTIC PATHWAY OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC CORONARY SYNDROME AFTER THE ISCHEMIA TRIAL PUBLICATION

Introduction

Patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) can initially undergo an invasive (i.e., early referral to invasive coronary angiography [ICA]) or a conservative (i.e., anatomical or functional testing before ICA) management. The ISCHEMIA trial showed no difference between these two strategies in CCS patients with moderate-to-severe ischemia. The aim of our study was to assess whether the results of the ISCHEMIA trial impacted on the management of CCS patients.

Methods

Trends in the management of patients with CCS in our centre, according to the ISCHEMIA trial publication date, were analyzed and patients categorized into pre-ISCHEMIA (before March 2020) and post-ISCHEMIA (from July 2020 to February 2022) groups, with an in-between blanking period of three months. The primary outcome was incidence of referral to ICA by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Secondary objectives included the incidence ischemia test-referred ICA, incidence of CCTA-referred ICA and subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), incidence of ischemia test-referred ICA and subsequent PCI and incidence of CCTA-referred ICA without subsequent PCI. Differences between the pre-specified subpopulations (age ≥75 years, diabetes, chronic kidney disease [CKD], peripheral arterial disease [PAD], gender male, unstable angina, active smoking status, body mass index [BMI] &gt;30, hypertension, family history of coronary artery disease [CAD], atrial fibrillation [AF], prior percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], prior coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) and the general population of the study were tested using a regression analysis.

Results

A total of 2,365 patients were included, 487 (20.6%) and 1,878 (79.4%) in the pre-ISCHEMIA and post-ISCHEMIA groups, respectively. There were no notable between-group differences in baseline characteristics. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in the post-ISCHEMIA group (73.5% vs. 32.5%; p&lt;0.01). Compared to pre-ISCHEMIA, the post-ISCHEMIA group displayed less referrals to ICA by ischemia testing (31.6% vs. 52.5%; p&lt;0.01) and more ICA referrals by CCTA with subsequent PCI (8.3% vs. 12.0%; p&lt;0.01). There were no within-group differences in ischemia test-referred ICA and PCI, and CCTA-referred ICA without subsequent PCI. A regression analysis between the primary endpoint incidence in the general population compared to the incidence in the pre-specified subpopulations showed no significant difference in the p values for interaction.

Conclusions

In the first two years from publication, the ISCHEMIA trial significantly impacted on the decision-making algorithm for patients with CCS, increasing referral to ICA by CCTA and diminishing ICAs indicated by an ischemia test.

Impact of the ISCHEMIA randomized clinical trial on the management of patients with chronic coronary syndrome

Background

In the ISCHEMIA trial, patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and moderate or severe ischemia had no significant difference in combined ischemic events with an initial invasive compared with a conservative strategy [1]. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) was part of the pre-randomization workup of ISCHEMIA and is gaining popularity over ischemia testing or initial invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the initial diagnostic strategy for CCS [2].

Purpose

To analyse whether the results of the ISCHEMIA trial had a sizeable impact on the diagnostic algorithm for CCS by analysing trends in referral to ICA and/or revascularization.

Methods

ICAs performed in CCS patients between November 2019 and February 2022 at a high-volume centre were analysed. Two groups were defined based on procedure date: i) pre-ISCHEMIA, including ICAs performed before March 2020 (date of trial publication); ii) post-ISCHEMIA, including ICAs performed ≥3 months (i.e., blanking period) after trial publication. The primary outcome was the incidence of referral to ICA by CCTA. Secondary objectives included referral to ICA or revascularization by ischemia testing, referral to revascularization by CCTA, and referral by CCTA to ICA that did not require further intervention.

Results

A total of 2,365 patients qualified for the analysis, of which 487 (20.6%) and 1878 (79.4%) in the pre-ISCHEMIA and post-ISCHEMIA groups, respectively. There were no notable differences in baseline characteristics between groups. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in the post-ISCHEMIA group (73.5% vs 32.5%, p&lt;0.01). Referral to ICA by ischemia testing was lower in the post-ISCHEMIA group (31.6%, vs 52.5% p&lt;0.01), while referral for revascularization by CCTA was more frequent (8.3% vs 12.0% p&lt;0.01). There were no significant differences in referral to revascularization by ischemia testing (3.4% vs 3.0%, p=0.73) and referral by CCTA to ICA that did not require further intervention (60.3% vs 60.8%, p=0.90).

Conclusions

At two years from publication, the ISCHEMIA trial seems to have impacted significantly on the decision-making algorithm for patients with CCS. The frequency of referral to ICA and revascularization by CCTA considerably increased, paralleled by decreased referral to ICA by ischemia testing.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Serum creatine kinase isoenzymes in children with osteogenesis imperfecta

This study evaluates serum creatine kinase isoenzyme activity in children with osteogenesis imperfecta to determine its usefulness as a biochemical marker during treatment with bisphosphonate. The changes of creatine kinase (CK) isoenzyme activity during and after discontinuation therapy were observed. These results could be useful in addressing over-treatment risk prevention.

INTRODUCTION

The brain isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CKbb) is highly expressed in mature osteoclasts during osteoclastogenesis, thus plays an important role in bone resorption. We previously identified high serum CKbb levels in 18 children with osteogenesis imperfect (OI) type 1 treated for 1 year with bisphosphonate (neridronate). In the present study, serum CK isoenzymes were evaluated in the same children with continuous versus discontinued neridronate treatment over a further 2-year follow-up period.

METHODS

This study included 18 children with OI type 1, 12 with continued (group A) and 6 with ceased (group B) neridronate treatment. Auxological data, serum biochemical markers of bone metabolism, bone mineral density z-score, and serum total CK and isoenzyme activities were determined in both groups.

RESULTS

Serum CKbb was progressively and significantly increased in group A (p < 0.004) but rapidly decreased to undetectable levels in group B. In both groups, the cardiac muscle creatine kinase isoenzyme (CKmb) showed a marked decrease, while serum C-terminal telopeptide (CTx) levels were almost unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of the cumulative effect of neridronate administration in increasing serum CKbb levels and the reversible effect after its discontinuation. This approach could be employed for verifying the usefulness of serum CKbb as a biochemical marker in patients receiving prolonged bisphosphonate treatment. Moreover, the decreased serum CKmb levels suggest a systemic effect of these drugs.

Inhibition of TNF-alpha improves indomethacin-induced enteropathy in rats by modulating iNOS expression

TNF-alpha, including other proinflammatory cytokines alone or in combination, induces iNOS expression and upregulates inflammatory responses. We evaluated the relationship between TNF-alpha and iNOS expression in indomethacin-induced jejunoileitis in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats were fed a daily dose of a phosphodiesterase inhibitor-either theophylline or pentoxifylline-for 2 days. Jejunoileitis was induced with two subcutaneous injections of indomethacin (7.5 mg/kg) 24 hr apart and theophylline or pentoxifylline continued for 12 hr or 4 days. Other rats received a single intraperitoneal injection of anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody (TNF-Ab) 30-min before indomethacin. At 4 days TNF-Ab, theophylline, or pentoxifylline treatment significantly decreased indomethacin-induced ulceration, myeloperoxidase activity, and disease activity index. Although indomethacin significantly increased serum TNF-alpha and nitrate/nitrite levels over the control value as early as 12 hr, iNOS expression was detected only after 4 days. Serum IL-1beta level did not change at 12 hr but increased fourfold at 4 days. Treatment with TNF-Ab, theophylline, or pentoxifylline significantly reduced serum/tissue TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, nitrate/nitrite, and iNOS expression. The downregulation of nitrate/nitrite by these inhibitors suggests that TNF-alpha modulates iNOS expression.

Once-daily aminoglycoside dosing: impact on requests and costs for therapeutic drug monitoring

Recently, much interest has focused on the use of once-daily aminoglycosides (ODA) in the medical literature. In late 1992, we implemented a hospital-wide ODA program for adult patients at our 850-bed community-teaching hospital. In the first phase of implementation, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was accomplished with the use of a random serum concentration and a nomogram that had been developed at our institution. In the second phase, serum drug concentrations were eliminated on patients with normal renal function. The fully implemented program resulted in a 40% decrease in the request for gentamicin and tobramycin serum concentrations as compared with historic ordering patterns for conventional aminoglycoside dosing regimens. In addition, the incidence of nephrotoxicity was also reduced from 3 to 5% with conventional aminoglycoside dosing, to 1.2 and 1.3% for phases 1 and 2, respectively. Furthermore, the elimination of TDM requests totaling 300 for gentamicin and 50 for tobramycin per month is expected to result in an annual institutional savings of > $100,000.