Impact of the ISCHEMIA randomized clinical trial on the management of patients with chronic coronary syndrome

Background

In the ISCHEMIA trial, patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and moderate or severe ischemia had no significant difference in combined ischemic events with an initial invasive compared with a conservative strategy [1]. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) was part of the pre-randomization workup of ISCHEMIA and is gaining popularity over ischemia testing or initial invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the initial diagnostic strategy for CCS [2].

Purpose

To analyse whether the results of the ISCHEMIA trial had a sizeable impact on the diagnostic algorithm for CCS by analysing trends in referral to ICA and/or revascularization.

Methods

ICAs performed in CCS patients between November 2019 and February 2022 at a high-volume centre were analysed. Two groups were defined based on procedure date: i) pre-ISCHEMIA, including ICAs performed before March 2020 (date of trial publication); ii) post-ISCHEMIA, including ICAs performed ≥3 months (i.e., blanking period) after trial publication. The primary outcome was the incidence of referral to ICA by CCTA. Secondary objectives included referral to ICA or revascularization by ischemia testing, referral to revascularization by CCTA, and referral by CCTA to ICA that did not require further intervention.

Results

A total of 2,365 patients qualified for the analysis, of which 487 (20.6%) and 1878 (79.4%) in the pre-ISCHEMIA and post-ISCHEMIA groups, respectively. There were no notable differences in baseline characteristics between groups. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in the post-ISCHEMIA group (73.5% vs 32.5%, p<0.01). Referral to ICA by ischemia testing was lower in the post-ISCHEMIA group (31.6%, vs 52.5% p<0.01), while referral for revascularization by CCTA was more frequent (8.3% vs 12.0% p<0.01). There were no significant differences in referral to revascularization by ischemia testing (3.4% vs 3.0%, p=0.73) and referral by CCTA to ICA that did not require further intervention (60.3% vs 60.8%, p=0.90).

Conclusions

At two years from publication, the ISCHEMIA trial seems to have impacted significantly on the decision-making algorithm for patients with CCS. The frequency of referral to ICA and revascularization by CCTA considerably increased, paralleled by decreased referral to ICA by ischemia testing.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: an uncertain nosological entity. Report of a case

INTRODUCTION

Appendiceal mucocele is a relatively rare condition characterized by progressive dilation of the appendix caused by intraluminal accumulation of mucoid substance. Its incidence is 0.07 - 0,63% of all appendectomies performed.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a 70-year-old man who came to our observation with gravative pain in right lower abdominal region. A computed tomography abdominal scan revealed a cystic/tubular structure like an appendicular mass with wall enhancement but without calcifications suggestive of a mucocele. Into peritoneal cavity we found profuse mucinous material with a 1,5 cm size parietal nodule. We also identified a free perforation of the cecum with consensual spillage of gelatinous material mimicking a pseudomyxoma peritonei. We decided to perform a right hemicolectomy with excision of peritoneal lesion.

DISCUSSION

The controversy in the pathologic terminology can give rise to a clinical dilemma in terms of the management and follow-up plans. For mucosal hyperplasia and cystadenoma simple appendectomy is curative. Only in case of large base of implantation it may be necessary the resection of the ileum and caecum or right hemicolectomy. In case of mucinous cystoadenocarcinoma authors perform a right hemicolectomy.

CONCLUSION

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are different pathological entities. The correct surgical management depends on size and location of lesion. A preoperative diagnosis is obviously needed in order to perform the correct treatment. CT abdominal scan is the better diagnostic tool, but different authors show their inability to reach a preoperative diagnosis in the larger majority of cases.

Small solid renal masses: characterization by diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T

AIM

To describe the appearance of small solid renal lesions (≤3 cm) on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to determine whether ADC measurements may help to differentiate benign from malignant small solid renal masses.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-five patients with 47 small renal masses (23 malignant, 24 benign) who underwent 3 T MRI of the kidney using diffusion-weighted sequences (b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm(2)) were retrospectively evaluated. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted images was performed.

RESULTS

Most lesions were hyperintense to kidney on high b-value diffusion-weighted images and hypointense on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. The mean ADC of the lesions was significantly lower than that of kidney (1.22 ± 0.3 versus 1.85 ± 0.12 mm(2)/s; p < 0.005). The mean ADC was significantly different between renal cell carcinomas (1.2 ± 0.01 mm(2)/s), metastases (1.25 ± 0.04 mm(2)/s), angiomyolipoma (1.07 ± 0.3 mm(2)/s) and oncocytomas (1.56 ± 0.08 mm(2)/s; p < 0.05). The mean ADC of clear cell renal cell carcinomas was significantly different from that of non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (1.38 ± 0.34 versus 0.83 ± 0.34 mm(2)/s; p < 0.005). No significant difference was found between mean ADC of fat containing and minimal fat angiomyolipomas (1.06 ± 0.48 versus 1.11 ± 0.33 mm(2)/s).

CONCLUSION

Small solid renal masses are hyperintense on high b value and have different ADC values.

Weaning from mechanical ventilation: an open issue

Weaning from mechanical ventilation represents one of the main challenges facing ICU physicians. Difficult weaning affects about 25% of critical patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Its duration correlates on one hand with pathophysiological aspects of the underlying disease and, on the other hand, with other factors such as the development of neuromyopathy of the critically ill patient, prolonged use of sedative-hypnotic drugs and, most of all, physicians' reluctance to identify the correct timing of therapeutic steps for weaning and subsequent extubation. The goal of adopting weaning protocols is to overcome problems due to an exclusively clinical opinion. Protocols have to be used together with daily clinical evaluation of the patient and the procedure must be carried out by an ICU team of both medical and nursing staff. Attempts to wean a patient from a ventilator and extubate him should be made through a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) with T-tube or pressure support ventilation (PSV) with pressure support of 7-8 cmH(2)O +/- PEEP =/> 4 cmH(2)O. Proper recourse to non invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and an accurate timing for tracheostomy are effective tools which can be used by physicians to facilitate weaning and to improve patient outcomes.