The emerging role of local therapy in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer

JAK2 Loss Arising From Tumor-Spread-Through-Air-Spaces (STAS) Promotes Tumor Progression by Suppressing CD8+ T Cells in Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Machine Learning Approach

BACKGROUND

Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) is a recently discovered risk factor for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The aim of this study was to investigate specific genetic alterations and anticancer immune responses related to STAS. By using a machine learning algorithm and drug screening in lung cancer cell lines, we analyzed the effect of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) on the survival of patients with LUAD and possible drug candidates.

METHODS

This study included 566 patients with LUAD corresponding to clinicopathological and genetic data. For analyses of LUAD, we applied gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), in silico cytometry, pathway network analysis, in vitro drug screening, and gradient boosting machine (GBM) analysis.

RESULTS

The patients with STAS had a shorter survival time than those without STAS (P < 0.001). We detected gene set-related downregulation of JAK2 associated with STAS using GSEA. Low JAK2 expression was related to poor prognosis and a low CD8+ T-cell fraction. In GBM, JAK2 showed improved survival prediction performance when it was added to other parameters (T stage, N stage, lymphovascular invasion, pleural invasion, tumor size). In drug screening, mirin, CCT007093, dihydroretenone, and ABT737 suppressed the growth of lung cancer cell lines with low JAK2 expression.

CONCLUSION

In LUAD, low JAK2 expression linked to the presence of STAS might serve as an unfavorable prognostic factor. A relationship between JAK2 and CD8+ T cells suggests that STAS is indirectly related to the anticancer immune response. These results may contribute to the design of future experimental research and drug development programs for LUAD with STAS.

Distinct Recurrence Pattern and Survival Outcomes of Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: The Potential Role of Local Therapy in Intrapulmonary Spread

BACKGROUND

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) is distinct from non-mucinous adenocarcinoma, but studies on recurrent IMA are scarce. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the recurrence patterns of IMA and the role of pulmonary local therapy (LT) in resectable pulmonary recurrence of IMA.

METHODS

The study reviewed 403 patients with surgically resected IMA between 1998 and 2018. The recurrence patterns were categorized as solitary pulmonary recurrence (SPR), multiple pulmonary recurrence (MPR), and extra-pulmonary recurrence (EPR). The clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), and post-recurrence survival (PRS) were analyzed according to the recurrence pattern and LT administration.

RESULTS

Recurrences were found in 91 (22.6%) patients, including 18 patients with SPR, 37 patients with MPR, and 36 patients with EPR. Compared with the MPR and EPR groups, the SPR group had a longer disease-free interval (32.5 vs. 9.6 vs. 10.1 months, respectively; p < 0.01) and a better OS (5-year OS: 88.5%, 41.5%, and 22.9%, respectively; p < 0.01). In case of resectable pulmonary recurrence, pulmonary LT was administered to 15 patients with SPR and 3 patients with MPR. These patients showed a better 5-year PRS than the other patients with pulmonary recurrence (86.3% vs. 30.4%; p < 0.01). Notably, long-term survival was observed for one patient with MPR undergoing LT and two patients with SPR undergoing a second LT for a second pulmonary recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, the patients with recurrent IMA showed different prognoses according to the recurrence pattern. The patients with pulmonary recurrence of IMA undergoing LT showed a favorable prognosis, suggesting the potential role of LT for resectable pulmonary recurrence of IMA.

Emerging evidence and treatment paradigm of non-small cell lung cancer

Research on biomarker-driven therapy and immune check-point blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving. The width and depth of clinical trials have also dramatically improved in an unprecedented speed. The personalized treatment paradigm evolved every year. In this review, we summarize the promising agents that have shifted the treatment paradigm for NSCLC patients across all stages, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors. Based on recent evidence, we propose treatment algorithms for NSCLC and propose several unsolved clinical issues, which are being explored in ongoing clinical trials. The results of these trials are likely to impact future clinical practice.

Treatment Sequencing in Resectable Lung Cancer: The Good and the Bad of Adjuvant Versus Neoadjuvant Therapy

The treatment scenario for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer has changed dramatically with the incorporation of immunotherapy. The introduction of immunotherapy into treatment algorithms has yielded improved clinical outcomes in several phase II and III trials in both adjuvant (Impower010 and PEARLS) and neoadjuvant settings (JHU/MSK, LCMC3, NEOSTAR, Columbia/MGH, NADIM, and CheckMate-816), leading to new U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals in this sense. Different treatment options are now available for patients, making the optimal treatment scenario a matter of intense debate. In this review, we summarize the main results concerning treatment sequencing in resectable non-small cell lung cancer from the past 30 years in the preimmunotherapy era, focusing on recent advances after incorporation of immunotherapy. Finally, the utility of several parameters (PD-L1, tumor mutational burden, radiomics, circulating tumor DNA, T-cell receptor, and immune populations) as predictive biomarkers for therapy personalization is discussed.

Patient Selection for Local Aggressive Treatment in Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Since the first introduction of the oligometastatic state with a low burden of metastases in non-small cell lung cancer, accumulating evidence from retrospective and prospective studies has shown that a local aggressive, multimodality treatment may significantly improve the prognosis in these patients. Local aggressive treatment includes a systemic therapy of micrometastatic disease, as well as a radical resection of the primary tumor and surgical resection and/or radiation therapy of distant metastases. However, patient selection and treatment allocation remain a central challenge in oligometastatic disease. In this review, we aimed to address the current evidence on criteria for patient selection for local aggressive treatment in non-small cell lung cancer.

Abstract

One-fourth of all patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer presents with a limited number of metastases and relatively low systemic tumor burden. This oligometastatic state with limited systemic tumor burden may be associated with remarkably improved overall and progression-free survival if both primary tumor and metastases are treated radically combined with systemic therapy. This local aggressive therapy (LAT) requires a multidisciplinary approach including medical oncologists, radiation therapists, and thoracic surgeons. A surgical resection of the often advanced primary tumor should be part of the radical treatment whenever feasible. However, patient selection, timing, and a correct treatment allocation for LAT appear to be essential. In this review, we aimed to summarize and discuss the current evidence on patient selection criteria such as characteristics of the primary tumor and metastases, response to neoadjuvant or first-line treatment, molecular characteristics, mediastinal lymph node involvement, and other factors for LAT in oligometastatic NSCLC.