A Case of Lung Adenocarcinoma Resistant to Crizotinib Harboring a Novel EML4-ALK Variant, Exon 6 of EML4 Fused to Exon 18 of ALK

A Poor Prognostic ALK Phenotype: A Review of Molecular Markers of Poor Prognosis in ALK Rearranged Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements derive a significant and durable clinical benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, early progression/death on treatment occurs in a subset of patients, which we term the poor prognostic ALK phenotype. This review aims to summarize the known molecular mechanisms that underlie this phenotype with a focus on variant 3 and TP53 mutations.

METHODS

A scoping review was performed using scientific databases such as Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies included molecular markers of poor prognosis, with a focus on TP53 mutations, variant 3 re-arrangements, and poor clinical response to TKIs.

RESULTS

Of 4371 studies screened, 108 were included. Numerous studies implicated a negative prognostic role of variant 3, likely mediated through the acquisition of on-target resistance mutations and TP53 mutations which are associated with greater chromosomal instability and mutational burden. Co-occurring variant 3 and TP53 mutations were associated with even worse survival. Other mediators of early resistance development include aberrations in cell cycle regulators and mutations in cell signaling pathways. Comprehensive genomic analysis from first-line TKI clinical trial data was unable to identify a singular genomic signature that underlies the poor prognostic phenotype but implicated a combination of pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review highlights that the poor prognostic ALK phenotype is likely composed of a heterogeneous variety of genomic factors. There remains an unmet need for a genomic assay to integrate these various molecular markers to predict this ALK phenotype.

Mechanistic patterns and clinical implications of oncogenic tyrosine kinase fusions in human cancers

Tyrosine kinase (TK) fusions are frequently found in cancers, either as initiating events or as a mechanism of resistance to targeted therapy. Partner genes and exons in most TK fusions are followed typical recurrent patterns, but the underlying mechanisms and clinical implications of these patterns are poorly understood. By developing Functionally Active Chromosomal Translocation Sequencing (FACTS), we discover that typical TK fusions involving ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK1 are selected from pools of chromosomal rearrangements by two major determinants: active transcription of the fusion partner genes and protein stability. In contrast, atypical TK fusions that are rarely seen in patients showed reduced protein stability, decreased downstream oncogenic signaling, and were less responsive to inhibition. Consistently, patients with atypical TK fusions were associated with a reduced response to TKI therapies. Our findings highlight the principles of oncogenic TK fusion formation and selection in cancers, with clinical implications for guiding targeted therapy.

Mechanistic patterns and clinical implications of oncogenic tyrosine kinase fusions in human cancers

Tyrosine kinase (TK) fusions are frequently found in cancers, either as initiating events or as a mechanism of resistance to targeted therapy. Partner genes and exons in most TK fusions are typical and recurrent, but the underlying mechanisms and clinical implications of these patterns are poorly understood. Here, we investigated structures of > 8,000 kinase fusions and explore their generative mechanisms by applying newly developed experimental framework integrating high-throughput genome-wide gene fusion sequencing and clonal selection called Functionally Active Chromosomal Translocation Sequencing (FACTS). We discovered that typical oncogenic TK fusions recurrently seen in patients are selected from large pools of chromosomal rearrangements spontaneously occurring in cells based on two major determinants: active transcription of the fusion partner genes and protein stability. In contrast, atypical TK fusions that are rarely seen in patients showed reduced protein stability, decreased downstream oncogenic signaling, and were less responsive to inhibition. Consistently, patients with atypical TK fusions were associated with a reduced response to TKI therapies, as well as a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to patients with typical TK fusions. These findings highlight the principles of oncogenic TK fusion formation and their selection in cancers, with clinical implications for guiding targeted therapy.

Combined Focused Next-Generation Sequencing Assays to Guide Precision Oncology in Solid Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis from an Institutional Molecular Tumor Board

BACKGROUND

Increasing knowledge of cancer biology and an expanding spectrum of molecularly targeted therapies provide the basis for precision oncology. Despite extensive gene diagnostics, previous reports indicate that less than 10% of patients benefit from this concept.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients referred to our center's Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) from 2018 to 2021. Molecular testing by next-generation sequencing (NGS) included a 67-gene panel for the detection of short-sequence variants and copy-number alterations, a 53- or 137-gene fusion panel and an ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequencing for the detection of additional copy-number alterations outside the panel's target regions. Immunohistochemistry for microsatellite instability and PD-L1 expression complemented NGS.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients were referred to the MTB. In all, 78 patients received therapeutic proposals (70 based on NGS) and 33 were treated accordingly. Evaluable patients treated with MTB-recommended therapy (n = 30) had significantly longer progression-free survival than patients treated with other therapies (n = 17) (4.3 vs. 1.9 months, p = 0.0094). Seven patients treated with off-label regimens experienced major clinical benefits.

CONCLUSION

The combined focused sequencing assays detected targetable alterations in the majority of patients. Patient benefits appeared to lie in the same range as with large-scale sequencing approaches.

A Case of Lung Adenocarcinoma Response to Alectinib Harboring a Rare EML4-ALK Variant, Exon 6 of EML4 Fused to Exon 18 of ALK

More than 20 types of ALK fusion variant subtypes have been identified, including different fusion partner genes or EML4-ALK fusions with different breakpoints. However, different ALK fusions show different sensitivities to ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) and the emergence of rare fusions brings great challenges to the target therapy in clinic. We report a rare EML4-ALK (E6;A18) fusion in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma that responded well to alectinib. This is the second case of this rare variant reported but the first report of response to an ALK-TKI. This evidence is the first to show that alectinib may be effective for this rare fusion type of non-small cell lung cancer, and these findings have important implications for drug selection in patients with this subtype. Further studies are needed to understand the function of this variant.

An All-In-One Transcriptome-Based Assay to Identify Therapy-Guiding Genomic Aberrations in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients

The number of genomic aberrations known to be relevant in making therapeutic decisions for non-small cell lung cancer patients has increased in the past decade. Multiple molecular tests are required to reliably establish the presence of these aberrations, which is challenging because available tissue specimens are generally small. To optimize diagnostic testing, we developed a transcriptome-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay based on single primed enrichment technology. We interrogated 11 cell lines, two patient-derived frozen biopsies, nine pleural effusion, and 29 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. All clinical samples were selected based on previously identified mutations at the DNA level in EGFR, KRAS, ALK, PIK3CA, BRAF, AKT1, MET, NRAS, or ROS1 at the DNA level, or fusion genes at the chromosome level, or by aberrant protein expression of ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1. A successful analysis is dependent on the number of unique reads and the RNA quality, as indicated by the DV200 value. In 27 out of 51 samples with >50 K unique reads and a DV200 >30, all 19 single nucleotide variants (SNVs)/small insertions and deletions (INDELs), three MET exon 14 skipping events, and 13 fusion gene transcripts were detected at the RNA level, giving a test accuracy of 100%. In summary, this lung-cancer-specific all-in-one transcriptome-based assay for the simultaneous detection of mutations and fusion genes is highly sensitive.

Response to crizotinib in a non-small-cell lung cancer patient harboring an EML4-ALK fusion with an atypical LTBP1 insertion

Fusion of the anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) with the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein 4 gene (EML4) is the second most common actionable alteration in non-small-cell lung cancer, with a frequency of 5%. Here, we present a case of an EML4-ALK-positive patient with an atypical in-frame insertion from the LTBP1 gene in the canonical junction of variant 1. The patient was a 39-year-old never-smoker female diagnosed with Stage IV lung adenocarcinoma. A core biopsy was negative for EGFR and KRAS mutations but positive for ALK immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. When submitted to nCounter, the sample showed a 3'/5' imbalance indicative of an ALK rearrangement, but failed to give a positive signal for any of the variants tested. Finally, a band with a molecular weight higher than expected appeared after reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis. When Sanger sequencing was performed, the band revealed an atypical EML4-ALK fusion gene with an in-frame 129 bp insertion. A 115 bp segment of the insertion corresponded to an intronic region of LTBP1, a gene located in the short arm of chromosome 2, between ALK and EML4. The patient received crizotinib and showed a good therapeutic response that is still ongoing after 12 months. Our result suggests that short in-frame insertions of other genes in the EML4-ALK junction do not affect the sensitivity of the EML4-ALK fusion protein to crizotinib.

Drug resistance in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged lung cancer

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase, and many kinds of ALK fusion genes have been found in a variety of carcinomas. There is almost no detectable expression of ALK in adults. However, through ALK gene rearrangement, the resultant ALK fusion protein is aberrantly overexpressed and dimerized through the oligomerization domains, such as the coiled‐coil domain, in the fusion partner that induces abnormal constitutive activation of ALK tyrosine kinase. This results in dysregulated cell proliferation. ALK gene rearrangement has been observed in 3%‐5% of non‐small‐cell lung cancers, and multiple ALK inhibitors have been developed for the treatment of ALK‐positive lung cancer. Among those inhibitors, in Japan, 3 (4 in the USA) ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved and are currently used in clinics. All of the currently approved ALK‐TKIs have been shown to induce marked tumor regression in ALK‐rearranged non‐small‐cell lung cancer; however, tumors inevitably relapse because of acquired resistance within a few years. This review focuses on ALK‐TKIs, their resistance mechanisms, and the potential therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance.

Uterine Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumors Frequently Harbor ALK Fusions With IGFBP5 and THBS1

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) can occur in a number of anatomic sites, including the uterus. Like its soft tissue counterpart, uterine IMT frequently expresses ALK and harbors ALK genetic rearrangements. The aim of this study is to fully characterize the genetic fusions that occur in uterine IMT. We studied 11 uterine IMTs with typical histology and 8 uterine myxoid smooth muscle tumors (5 leiomyomas, 1 smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential, and 2 leiomyosarcomas) in which the differential of IMT was considered, using a RNA-sequencing-based fusion assay to detect genetic fusions involving ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK1/3, and other genes. ALK was expressed in 10 of 11 IMTs and 1 tumor initially categorized as a myxoid leiomyoma (granular cytoplasmic staining with paranuclear accentuation). Fusion transcripts involving ALK were identified in 9 of 10 ALK immunopositive IMTs, with 3 harboring IGFBP5-ALK, 3 harboring THBS1-ALK, 2 harboring FN1-ALK, and 1 harboring TIMP3-ALK. Among the smooth muscle tumors, IGFBP5-ALK fusion transcript was identified in only 1 ALK immunopositive case. Further review revealed that although a diagnosis of IMT was considered for the ALK immunopositive myxoid leiomyoma, this diagnosis was not initially rendered only because fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was interpreted as negative for ALK genetic rearrangement; this case is best reclassified as an IMT. Notably, all the ALK fusions identified in our study included the transmembrane domain-encoding exon 19 of ALK. Our findings confirm the high frequency of ALK fusions in uterine IMT, with an enrichment of novel 5' ALK fusion partners (IGFBP5, THBS1, and TIMP3) and exon 19-containing ALK fusion. Given that IGFBP5 and FN1 are both situated on the same chromosome as ALK, fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis for ALK rearrangement may not be reliable and a negative result should not exclude a diagnosis of uterine IMT if the histologic features and ALK immunostaining findings are supportive.