Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment: Development of Study Design and Pilot Implementation

Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis on Image-Guided Biopsy Samples in Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Feasibility Study and Comparison With Surgical Samples

Introduction

Limited information exists on next-generation sequencing (NGS) success for lung tumors of 30 mm or less. We aimed to compare NGS success rates across biopsy techniques for these tumors, assess DNA sequencing quality, and verify reliability against surgical resection results.

Methods

We used data from the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment study, including patients with lung tumors measuring 30 mm or less who had surgery and NGS on biopsies since 2016. We collected data on biopsy type, nodule characteristics, complications, sequencing feasibility, clinical actionable variants, surgery type, and TNM classification. We compared NGS feasibility and quality between biopsy methods and, for those with NGS on surgical samples, compared feasibility, quality, and detection of actionable variants.

Results

Among the 654 participants with lung tumors of 30 mm or less who underwent surgery, 70 had NGS on prior biopsies. The median age was 68.5; 51.4% were male individuals, and 75.7% were smokers. The mean diameter of biopsied nodules was 17.7 mm, with 67.1% fine-needle aspiration, 17.1% computed tomography-guided transthoracic core needle biopsies, and 17.1% endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. DNA sequencing was feasible in 97.1% of biopsy samples; 2.9% had low tumor cellularity. Coverage depth was achieved in 89.7% of biopsies. RNA sequencing was successful in 66.2% of biopsies, especially in core needle biopsies. Actionable alterations were found in 41.4% of patients. Among the participants, 30% had NGS on surgical samples. RNA sequencing was more feasible on surgical samples (95.2% versus 42.9% for biopsies). NGS on surgical samples matched biopsy results in 90% of patients, with 10% showing additional alterations.

Conclusion

DNA sequencing succeeded in 97.1% of biopsies of nodules 30 mm or less, whereas RNA sequencing feasibility was lower. NGS on biopsy samples is generally reliable but requires careful review.

Should Treatment of Mesothelioma Include Surgery? MARS2 Fails to Land

The presentation of the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2 trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing pleurectomy/decortication to no surgery, injected new data into the contentious discussion surrounding the use of surgery in the management of diffuse pleural mesothelioma. We review the trial results in the context of the existing work surrounding the use of surgery in pleural mesothelioma.

Prospective Cohort Study to Compare Long-Term Lung Cancer-Specific and All-Cause Survival of Clinical Early Stage (T1a-b; ≤20 mm) NSCLC Treated by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Surgery

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare outcomes of patients with first primary clinical T1a-bN0M0 NSCLC treated with surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS

We identified patients with first primary clinical T1a-bN0M0 NSCLCs on last pretreatment computed tomography treated by surgery or SBRT in the following two prospective cohorts: International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP) and Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment (IELCART). Lung cancer-specific survival and all-cause survival after diagnosis were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline demographics and comorbidities and analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Of 1115 patients with NSCLC, 1003 had surgery and 112 had SBRT; 525 in I-ELCAP in 1992 to 2021 and 590 in IELCART in 2016 to 2021. Median follow-up was 57.6 months. Ten-year lung cancer-specific survival was not significantly different: 90% (95% confidence interval: 87%-92%) for surgery versus 88% (95% confidence interval: 77%-99%) for SBRT, p = 0.55. Cox regression revealed no significant difference in lung cancer-specific survival for the combined cohorts (p = 0.48) or separately for I-ELCAP (p = 1.00) and IELCART (p = 1.00). Although 10-year all-cause survival was significantly different (75% versus 45%, p < 0.0001), after propensity score matching, all-cause survival using Cox regression was no longer different for the combined cohorts (p = 0.74) or separately for I-ELCAP (p = 1.00) and IELCART (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

This first prospectively collected cohort analysis of long-term survival of small, early NSCLCs revealed that lung cancer-specific survival was high for both treatments and not significantly different (p = 0.48) and that all-cause survival after propensity matching was not significantly different (p = 0.74). This supports SBRT as an alternative treatment option for small, early NSCLCs which is especially important with their increasing frequency owing to low-dose computed tomography screening. Furthermore, treatment decisions are influenced by many different factors and should be personalized on the basis of the unique circumstances of each patient.

Radiologic Features of Nodules Attached to the Mediastinal or Diaphragmatic Pleura at Low-Dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening

Background Pulmonary noncalcified nodules (NCNs) attached to the fissural or costal pleura with smooth margins and triangular or lentiform, oval, or semicircular (LOS) shapes at low-dose CT are recommended for annual follow-up instead of immediate workup. Purpose To determine whether management of mediastinal or diaphragmatic pleura-attached NCNs (M/DP-NCNs) with the same features as fissural or costal pleura-attached NCNs at low-dose CT can follow the same recommendations. Materials and Methods This retrospective study reviewed chest CT examinations in participants from two databases. Group A included 1451 participants who had lung cancer that was first present as a solid nodule with an average diameter of 3.0-30.0 mm. Group B included 345 consecutive participants from a lung cancer screening program who had at least one solid nodule with a diameter of 3.0-30.0 mm at baseline CT and underwent at least three follow-up CT examinations. Radiologists reviewed CT images to identify solid M/DP-NCNs, defined as nodules 0 mm in distance from the mediastinal or diaphragmatic pleura, and recorded average diameter, margin, and shape. General descriptive statistics were used. Results Among the 1451 participants with lung cancer in group A, 163 participants (median age, 68 years [IQR, 61.5-75.0 years]; 92 male participants) had 164 malignant M/DP-NCNs 3.0-30.0 mm in average diameter. None of the 164 malignant M/DP-NCNs had smooth margins and triangular or LOS shapes (upper limit of 95% CI of proportion, 0.02). Among the 345 consecutive screening participants in group B, 146 participants (median age, 65 years [IQR, 59-71 years]; 81 female participants) had 240 M/DP-NCNs with average diameter 3.0-30.0 mm. None of the M/DP-NCNs with smooth margins and triangular or LOS shapes were malignant after a median follow-up of 57.8 months (IQR, 46.3-68.1 months). Conclusion For solid M/DP-NCNs with smooth margins and triangular or LOS shapes at low-dose CT, the risk of lung cancer is extremely low, which supports the recommendation of Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2022 for annual follow-up instead of immediate workup. © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Goodman and Baruah in this issue.

Measuring the margin distance in pulmonary wedge resection

BACKGROUND

Margin distance contributes to survival and recurrence during wedge resections for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. The Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment sought to standardize a surgeon-measured margin intraoperatively.

METHODS

Lung cancer patients who underwent wedge resection were reviewed. Margins were measured by the surgeon twice as per a standardized protocol. Intraobserver variability as well as surgeon-pathologist variability were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients underwent wedge resection. Same-surgeon measurement analysis indicated good reliability with a small mean difference and narrow limit of agreement for the two measures. The median surgeon-measured margin was 18.0 mm, median pathologist-measured margin was 16.0 mm and the median difference between the surgeon-pathologist margin was -1.0 mm, ranging from -18.0 to 12.0 mm. Bland-Altman analysis for margin measurements demonstrated a mean difference of 0.65 mm. The limit of agreement for the two approaches were wide, with the difference lying between -16.25 and 14.96 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel protocol of surgeon-measured margin was evaluated and compared with pathologist-measured margin. High intraobserver agreement for repeat surgeon measurements yet low-to-moderate correlation or directionality between surgeon and pathologic measurements were found.

DISCUSSION

A standardized protocol may reduce variability in pathologic assessment. These findings have critical implications considering the impact of margin distance on outcomes.

KristinHansenRichardKopelSamuelMayfieldWilliamLuedkeDanKlippensteinDonaldLitwinAlanLoudPeter A.KohmanLeslie J.ScalzettiErnest M.ThurerRichardVillamizarNestorKhanArfaShahRakeshLiuXueguoHerzogGaryYehDianaWuNingLowryJosephSalvatoreMaryFrumientoCarmineMendelsonDavid S.SmithMichael V.KorstRobertTaylorJanaGinsbergMichelle S.StraznickaMichaelaWidmannMarkCecchiGaryMatalonTerence A.S.ScheinbergPaulOdzerShari-LynnOlsenDavidGrannisFredRotterArnoldRayDanielMullenDavidWiernikPeter H.CheungEdson H.LimMelissaDeCunzoLouisGlassbergRobertPassHarveyEndressCarmenYoderMarkShahPalmiWelchLauraKalaferMichaelGreenJeremyWalshJamesBertschDavidCamachoElmerChinCynthiaO'BrienJamesWilleyJames C.HenschkeClaudia I.Principal InvestigatorYankelevitzDavid F.YipRowenaJirapatnakulArtitFloresRajaWolfAndreaLibbyDaniel M.SmithJames P.PasmantierMarkReevesA.P.MarkowitzStevenMillerAlbertDevalJose CerveraRobertsHeidiPatsiosDemetrisSoneShusukeHanaokaTakaomiZuluetaJavierde-TorresJuan P.LozanoMaria D.AyeRalphManningKristinBauerThomasCanitanoStefanoGiuntaSalvatoreColeEnserKlinglerKarlAustinJohn H.M.PearsonGregory D.N.ShahamDorithAylesworthCherylMeyersPatrickAndazShahriyourVafaiDavoodNaidichDavidMcGuinnessGeorgeannSheppardBarryRifkinMatthewThorsenM. KristinHansenRichardKopelSamuelMayfieldWilliamLuedkeDanKlippensteinDonaldLitwinAlanLoudPeter A.KohmanLeslie J.ScalzettiErnest M.ThurerRichardVillamizarNestorKhanArfaShahRakeshLiuXueguoHerzogGaryYehDianaWuNingLowryJosephSalvatoreMaryFrumientoCarmineMendelsonDavid S.SmithMichael V.KorstRobertTaylorJanaGinsbergMichelle S.StraznickaMichaelaWidmannMarkCecchiGaryMatalonTerence A.S.ScheinbergPaulOdzerShari-LynnOlsenDavidGrannisFredRotterArnoldRayDanielMullenDavidWiernikPeter H.CheungEdson H.LimMelissaDeCunzoLouisGlassbergRobertPassHarveyEndressCarmenYoderMarkShahPalmiWelchLauraKalaferMichaelWalshJamesBertschDavidCamachoElmerChinCynthiaWilleyJames C.. New or enlarging hiatal hernias after thoracic surgery for early lung cancer

Objective

The study objective was to determine the relationship between lung resection and the development of postoperative hiatal hernia.

Methods

Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography imaging from 373 patients from the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program and the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment were compared at a median of 31.1 months of follow-up after resection of clinical early-stage non–small cell lung cancer. Incidence of new hiatal hernia or changes to preexisting hernias were recorded and evaluated by patient demographics, surgical approach, extent of resection, and resection site.

Results

New hiatal hernias were seen in 9.6% of patients after lung resection (5.6% after wedge or segmentectomy and 12.4% after lobectomy; P = .047). The median size of new hernias was 21 mm, and the most commonly associated resection site was the left lower lobe (24.2%; P = .04). In patients with preexisting hernias, 53.5% demonstrated a small but significant increase in size from 21 to 22 mm (P < .0001). All hernias persisted through the latest postoperative computed tomography scan. When 110 surgical patients without preexisting hernia were matched by sex, age, and smoking to nonoperative controls, the incidence of new hernia at follow-up was significantly higher among those who underwent surgery (17.3% vs 2.7%, P = .0003).

Conclusions

Both open and minimally invasive lung resection for clinical early-stage lung cancer are associated with new or enlarging postoperative hiatal hernia, especially after resections involving the left lower lobe.

Early-Stage Lung Cancer Patients’ Perceptions of Presurgical Discussions

Background

Patients with early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have high survival rates, but patients often say they did not anticipate the effect of the surgery on their postsurgical quality of life (QoL). This study adds to the literature regarding patient and surgeon interactions and highlights the areas where the current approach is not providing good communication.

Design

Since its start in 2016, the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment (IELCART), a prospective cohort study, has enrolled 543 patients who underwent surgery for stage I NSCLC within the Mount Sinai Health System. Presurgical patient and surgeon surveys were available for 314 patients, postsurgical surveys for 420, and both pre- and postsurgical surveys for 285.

Results

Of patients with presurgical surveys, 31.2% said that their surgeon recommended multiple types of treatment. Of patients with postsurgical surveys, 85.0% felt very well prepared and 11.4% moderately well prepared for their postsurgical recovery. The median Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung Cancer score and social support score of the patients who felt very well prepared was significantly higher than those moderately or not well prepared (24.0 v. 22.0, P < 0.001) and (5.0 [interquartile range: 4.7–5.0] v. 5.0 [IQR: 4.2–5.0], p = 0.015).

Conclusions

This study provides insight into the areas where surgeons are communicating well with their patients as well as the areas where patients still feel uninformed. Most surgeons feel that they prepare their patients well or very well for surgical recovery, whereas some patients still feel that their surgeons did not prepare them well for postsurgical recovery. Surgeons may want to spend additional time emphasizing postsurgical recovery and QoL with their patients or provide their patients with additional avenues to get their questions and concerns addressed.

Highlights

Erythrocyte membrane-camouflaged gefitinib/albumin nanoparticles for tumor imaging and targeted therapy against lung cancer

Conventional chemotherapeutic drugs may cause serious side effects such as hepatotoxicity and renal toxicity due to lack of targeting, which affects therapy outcome and the prognosis of patients. Therefore, biomimetic nanoparticles with long blood circulation and active targeting have attracted increasing attention. In this work, we fabricated a biomimetic R-RBC@GEF-NPs nano-system by encapsulating gefitinib-loaded albumin nanoparticles (GEF-NPs) inside cRGD-modified red blood cell (RBC) membranes. The complete RBC membrane structure and membrane proteins enabled the NPs to escape phagocytosis by macrophages. In addition, the cRGD moiety significantly improved tumor cell targeting and uptake. R-RBC@GEF-NPs inhibited the growth of A549 cells in vitro in a dose- and time-dependent manner by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase. Likewise, the R-RBC@GEF-NPs also decreased tumor weight and volume in the mice injected with A549 cells and prolonged survival time. In addition, the ⁹⁹Tc-labeled R-RBC@GEF-NPs selectively accumulated in the tumor tissues in vivo, and enabled real time tumor imaging. Finally, blood and histological analyses showed that R-RBC@GEF-NPs did not cause any obvious systemic toxicity. Taken together, the biomimetic R-RBC@GEF-NPs is a promising therapeutic formulation for the treatment of lung cancer.

Effects of Smoking, Obesity, and Pulmonary Function on Home Oxygen Use after Curative Lung Cancer Surgery

RATIONALE

Lung cancer surgical morbidity has been decreasing, increasing attention to quality-of-life measures. A chronic sequela of lung cancer surgery is use of postoperative oxygen at home after discharge. Prospective studies are needed to identify risk predictors for home oxygen(HO2) use after curative lung cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively assess risk factors for postoperative oxygen use and post-surgical morbidity in patients undergoing curative lung cancer surgery. We hypothesized that obesity, poor pre-operative pulmonary function, and smoking status would contribute to the risk of postoperative oxygen use.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for first primary non-small cell lung cancer at Mount Sinai, from 2016 to 2020. Univariate, multivariable logistic regression analyses and adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 433 patients diagnosed with pathologic stage I non-small cell lung cancer, 63 (14.5%) were discharged with HO2. Using multivariable analyses, body mass index (OR for BMI25-30=4.0, 95% CI:1.6-11.2, p = 0.005 and OR for BMI≥ 30=6.1, 95% CI:2.4-17.5, p<0.001)and pre-operative diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide(DLCO) (OR for DLCO<40=24.9, 95% CI:3.6-234.1, p=0.002 and OR for DLCO 40-59=3.1, 95% CI:1.3-7.2, p=0.008) were significant independent risk factors associated with risk of home oxygen after controlling for other covariates. Although current smoking significantly increased the risk in the univariate analysis, it was no longer significant in the multivariable model.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide were significant as risk factors for oxygen use at home after discharge. These findings allow for identification of patients at risk of being discharged with home oxygen after lung resection surgery.

The Regimen of Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: Lessons Learned Over 25 Years From the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program

We learned many unanticipated and valuable lessons since we started planning our study of low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer in 1991. The publication of the baseline results of the Early Lung Cancer Action Project (ELCAP) in Lancet 1999 showed that CT screening could identify a high proportion of early, curable lung cancers. This stimulated large national screening studies to be quickly started. The ELCAP design, which provided evidence about screening in the context of a clinical program, was able to rapidly expand to a 12-institution study in New York State (NY-ELCAP) and to many international institutions (International-ELCAP), ultimately working with 82 institutions, all using the common I-ELCAP protocol. This expansion was possible because the investigators had developed the ELCAP Management System for screening, capturing data and CT images, and providing for quality assurance. This advanced registry and its rapid accumulation of data and images allowed continual assessment and updating of the regimen of screening as advances in knowledge and new technology emerged. For example, in the initial ELCAP study, introduction of helical CT scanners had allowed imaging of the entire lungs in a single breath, but the images were obtained in 10 mm increments resulting in about 30 images per person. Today, images are obtained in submillimeter slice thickness, resulting in around 700 images per person, which are viewed on high-resolution monitors. The regimen provides the imaging acquisition parameters, imaging interpretation, definition of positive result, and the recommendations for further workup, which now include identification of emphysema and coronary artery calcifications. Continual updating is critical to maximize the benefit of screening and to minimize potential harms. Insights were gained about the natural history of lung cancers, identification and management of nodule subtypes, increased understanding of nodule imaging and pathologic features, and measurement variability inherent in CT scanners. The registry also provides the foundation for assessment of new statistical techniques, including artificial intelligence, and integration of effective genomic and blood-based biomarkers, as they are developed.

Outcomes of superior segmentectomy versus lower lobectomy for superior segment Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer are equivalent: An analysis of 196 patients at a single, high volume institution

OBJECTIVES

To determine if superior segmentectomy has equivalent overall (OS), disease-free (DFS), and locoregional-recurrence-free survival (LRFS) to lower lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the superior segment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all Stage 1 lower lobectomies for superior segment lesions and superior segmentectomies at our hospital from 2000 to 2018. Comparison statistics and Cox hazard modeling were performed to determine differences between groups and attempt to identify risk factors for OS, DFS, and LRFS.

RESULTS

Superior segmentectomy patients, compared with lower lobectomy patients, had more current smokers, worse forced expiratory volume in 1 s percentage, radiologic emphysema scores, clinically and pathologically smaller tumors, and more occurrences of 0 lymph nodes examined. Outcomes for superior segmentectomy compared with lower lobectomy were equivalent for 5-year OS (67.0% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.70), DFS (56.9% vs. 60.4%, p = 0.59), and LRFS (87.9% vs. 91.3%, p = 0.46). Multivariable Cox modeling lacked utility due to no outcome differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In well-selected patients, superior segmentectomies can have equivalent OS, DFS, and LRFS compared with lower lobectomies of superior segment tumors for early stage lung cancer. Further data are needed to provide better risk estimates.

Change in quality of life of stage IA lung cancer patients after sublobar resection and lobectomy

Background

Few studies have examined the differential impact of sublobar resection (SL) and lobectomy (L) on quality of life (QoL) during the first postoperative year.

Methods

We used a prospective cohort of Stage IA lung cancer patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) from the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment. QoL was measured before surgery, and within 4, 6, and 12 months post-surgery using three validated instruments: SF-12 [physical (PCS) and mental health (MCS)], FACT-LCS (lung-cancer-symptoms), and the PHQ-4 (anxiety and depression subscales). Locally weighted smoothing curve (LOWESS) was fitted to identify the best interval knot for the change in the QoL trend post-surgery. After adjusting for demographic and clinical variables, an adjusted piecewise linear mixed effects model was developed to estimate differences in baseline and 12-month scores, and rates of change for each QoL measure.

Results

SL resection was performed in 127 (63.2%) and L in 74 (36.8%) patients. LOWESS plots suggested that the shift of QoL (interval knot) was at 2 months post-surgery. Decreases in PCS scores were less severe for SL than L patients 2 months post-surgery (−0.18 vs. −2.30, P=0.02); while subsequent improvements were observed for both groups (SL: +0.29 vs. L: +0.74, P=0.06). SL patients reported significantly better scores a year post-surgery compared to baseline (P=0.003), while L patients did not. Anxiety decreased at similar rates for both SL and L patients within 2 months post-surgery (P=0.18), then stabilized for the remaining months. MCS and depression scores remained stable in both groups throughout. QoL scores were lower for women than for men, but only significantly worse for the lung-cancer-symptoms (P=0.003) and anxiety (P=0.04).

Conclusions

SL patients fared better in physical health and lung cancer symptoms than L patients. The first two postoperative months showed the most significant change which suggests targeting postoperative intervention during that time.

The Quality of Peer-Reviewed Publications on Surgery for Early Stage Lung Cancer Within the Veterans Health Administration

The peer-reviewed literature is often referenced to generalize outcomes for lung cancer surgeries performed within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and include assessments following resection of early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to determine the reliability of these reports that are publicly available. A systematic review was undertaken to identify PubMed indexed articles that report postoperative outcomes following surgical resections for stage I NSCLC within the VHA. Only studies that reported American Joint Committee on Cancer staging were included. Eleven studies spanning 49 years (1966-2015) met the inclusion criteria. Two reported findings from national VHA databases while 9 reported outcomes from single institutions. Reporting of outcomes and prognostic factors varied widely between studies and were frequently omitted. This made it difficult to evaluate prognostic factors that may be associated with a wide range of 30- and 90-day perioperative mortality (0-3.8% and 0-6.4%), 3- and 5-year cause-specific survival (72-92% and 32-84%), and 3- and 5- year overall survival (47-85.7% and 24-74%). The quality of peer-reviewed literature that reports outcomes following thoracic surgery for stage I NSCLC in the VHA is inconsistent and precludes accurate assessments for generalizations about the quality of care in this healthcare system. Efforts to develop a dedicated outcome tracking and registry system can provide more meaningful evidence to identify areas for improvement for this often-curable malignancy.

Surgical Outcomes in a Lung Cancer-Screening Program Using Low Dose Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of death from cancer worldwide. More than 27,000 LCs are diagnosed annually in Spain, and most are unresectable. Early detection and treatment reduce LC mortality. This study describes surgical outcomes in a longstanding LC screening cohort in Spain.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of surgical outcomes in a LC screening (LCS) program using low dose computed tomography (LDCT) since the year 2000. A descriptive analysis of clinical and radiological parameters, presence or absence of a preoperative diagnosis, pathological staging, morbidity, mortality, and survival was performed.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven (2.5%) LC were diagnosed in 3825 screened. Twenty individuals with LC had no surgery due to advanced stage or small cell histology. Eighty-seven surgical procedures were carried out for suspected or biopsy proven LC, detected by LDCT. Most operated patients were male (57[85%]) aged 64±9.1 years. Nine patients underwent a second operation for a metachronous primary lung cancer. Mean tumor size was 15.2±7.6mm. Eight nodules were benign (9.2%). Lobectomy was performed in 56 cases (83.6%). Adenocarcinoma (n=39; 58.2%) was the most frequent histological type followed by squamous cell carcinoma (n=17; 25.4%). Fifty-nine (88%) tumors were in Stage I. Thirteen patients (15.4%) had 16 complications. The estimated survival rates at 5 and 10 years for stage I were 93% (95% CI: 79%-98%) and 83% (95% CI: 65%-92%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lung cancer screening was associated with excellent surgical outcomes with 5 and 10-year survival rates exceeding 90 and 80%, respectively.

Definitive Radiation for Stage I Lung Cancer in a Screened Population: Results From the I-ELCAP

PURPOSE

The International Early Lung Cancer Action Program is a cohort study to assess the cure rate of participants undergoing annual low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer. This study compares the characteristics and outcomes of patients who received a diagnosis of clinical stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treated with definitive radiation therapy and surgical resection.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patient information was drawn from the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program database from 1992 to 2017. All instances in which treatment was performed for histologically proven stage I NSCLC using definitive radiation therapy and surgery were identified. The home institution determined radiation plans. Patient characteristics and Kaplan-Meier lung cancer-specific (LCS) long-term survival rates were compared for both types of treatment. Follow-up time was calculated from time of diagnosis until death from lung cancer, loss to follow-up, or December 31, 2017, whichever came earlier.

RESULTS

Among 82,628 baseline and 109,250 annual repeat screenings, 853 patients received a diagnosis of clinical stage I NSCLC, of whom 31 (3.6%) were treated by definitive radiation therapy and 702 (82.3%) by surgical resection alone. Radiation therapy prescription information was obtainable for 24 of the 31 patients: The median dose was 54.5 Gy, the median number of fractions was 5, and 17 patients were treated using stereotactic body radiation therapy. LCS survival rates were not significantly different for radiation therapy compared with surgery: 90.0% (95% confidence interval, 84.9%-100.0%) versus 94.8% (95% confidence interval, 93.0%-96.6%) (P = .09). Median follow-up time was 9.7 years for all, but it was shorter for those treated by radiation therapy than for those who underwent surgery (4.3 vs 10.0 years, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients identified by computed tomography screening were treated with surgical resection. Despite being older and having more comorbidities, LCS long-term survival rates of patients treated with definitive radiation therapy were not significantly different compared with survival rates of patients treated with surgery alone. Radiation therapy appears to be a viable alternative to surgery for screen-diagnosed patients with lung cancer.

Long-Term Active Surveillance of Screening Detected Subsolid Nodules is a Safe Strategy to Reduce Overtreatment

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer presenting as subsolid nodule (SSN) can show slow growth, hence treating SSN is controversial. Our aim was to determine the long-term outcome of subjects with unresected SSNs in lung cancer screening.

METHODS

Since 2005, the Multicenter Italian Lung Detection (MILD) screening trial implemented active surveillance for persistent SSN, as opposed to early resection. Presence of SSNs was related to diagnosis of cancer at the site of SSN, elsewhere in the lung, or in the body. The risk of overall mortality and lung cancer mortality was tested by Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

SSNs were found in 16.9% (389 of 2303) of screenees. During 9.3 ± 1.2 years of follow-up, the hazard ratio of lung cancer diagnosis in subjects with SSN was 6.77 (95% confidence interval: 3.39-13.54), with 73% (22 of 30) of cancers not arising from SSN (median time to diagnosis 52 months from SSN). Lung cancer-specific mortality in subjects with SSN was significantly increased (hazard ratio = 3.80; 95% confidence interval: 1.24-11.65) compared to subjects without lung nodules. Lung cancer arising from SSN did not lead to death within the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with SSN in the MILD cohort showed a high risk of developing lung cancer elsewhere in the lung, with only a minority of cases arising from SSN, and never representing the cause of death. These results show the safety of active surveillance for conservative management of SSN until signs of solid component growth and the need for prolonged follow-up because of high risk of other cancers.