Lung Cancer in Brazil

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: The regulatory journey in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Recent therapeutic advances such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have impact on the care of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, however, they bring new setbacks for regulatory agencies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the regulatory journey of ICIs registered for NSCLC treatment in Brazil and to establish comparisons of Brazilian regulatory agency with the US regulatory agency.

METHODS AND DATA SOURCE

Information for each ICI prescribing as well as the date of regulatory approval of the therapeutic indications of interest were collected from the Anvisa and the FDA websites. The search took place on October 2022.

KEY FINDINGS

There are only 20 % disagreements on regulatory approvals between Anvisa and FDA. The prioritization review at Anvisa in 2008 has made the regulatory assessment faster.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study identified a potential improvement in Anvisa's time performance to connect the target established by the legal framework of the sector.

Lung Cancer Screening in Brazil Comparing the 2013 and 2021 USPSTF Guidelines

Importance

It is estimated that, from 2023 to 2025, lung cancer (LC) will be the second most frequent cancer in Brazil, but the country does not have an LC screening (LCS) policy.

Objective

To compare the number of individuals eligible for screening, 5-year preventable LC deaths, and years of life gained (YLG) if LC death is averted by LCS, considering 3 eligibility strategies by sociodemographic characteristics.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This comparative effectiveness research study assessed 3 LCS criteria by applying a modified version of the LC-Death Risk Assessment Tool (LCDRAT) and the LC-Risk Assessment Tool (LCRAT). Data are from the 2019 Brazilian National Household Survey. Participants included ever-smokers aged 50 to 80 years. Data analysis was performed from February to May 2023.

Exposures

Exposures included ever-smokers aged 50 to 80 years, US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2013 guidelines (ever-smokers aged 55 to 80 years with ≥30 pack-years and <15 years since cessation), and USPSTF 2021 guidelines (ever-smokers aged 50 to 80 years with 20 pack-years and <15 years since cessation).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were the numbers of individuals eligible for LCS, the 5-year preventable deaths attributable to LC, and the number of YLGs if death due to LC was averted by LCS.

Results

In Brazil, the eligible population for LCS was 27 280 920 ever-smokers aged 50 to 80 years (13 387 552 female [49.1%]; 13 249 531 [48.6%] aged 50-60 years; 394 994 Asian or Indigenous [1.4%]; 3 111 676 Black [11.4%]; 10 942 640 Pardo [40.1%]; 12 830 904 White [47.0%]; 12 428 536 [45.6%] with an incomplete middle school education; and 12 860 132 [47.1%] living in the Southeast region); 5 144 322 individuals met the USPSTF 2013 criteria for LCS (2 090 636 female [40.6%]; 2 290 219 [44.5%] aged 61-70 years; 66 430 Asian or Indigenous [1.3%]; 491 527 Black [9.6%]; 2 073 836 Pardo [40.3%]; 2 512 529 [48.8%] White; 2 436 221 [47.4%] with an incomplete middle school education; and 2 577 300 [50.1%] living in the Southeast region), and 8 380 279 individuals met the USPSTF 2021 LCS criteria (3 507 760 female [41.9%]; 4 352 740 [51.9%] aged 50-60 years; 119 925 Asian or Indigenous [1.4%]; 839 171 Black [10.0%]; 3 330 497 Pardo [39.7%]; 4 090 687 [48.8%] White; 4 022 784 [48.0%] with an incomplete middle school education; and 4 162 070 [49.7%] living in the Southeast region). The number needed to screen to prevent 1 death was 177 individuals according to the USPSTF 2013 criteria and 242 individuals according to the USPSTF 2021 criteria. The YLG was 23 for all ever-smokers, 19 for the USPSTF 2013 criteria, and 21 for the USPSTF 2021 criteria. Being Black, having less than a high school education, and living in the North and Northeast regions were associated with increased 5-year risk of LC death.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this comparative effectiveness study, USPSTF 2021 criteria were better than USPSTF 2013 in reducing disparities in LC death rates. Nonetheless, the risk of LC death remained unequal, and these results underscore the importance of identifying an appropriate approach for high-risk populations for LCS, considering the local epidemiological context.

The journey of stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer patients in the Brazilian private healthcare system: a retrospective study

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still diagnosed at late stages in Brazil. The availability of newer treatment options has changed patient management, however, few real-world data have been published since then. This is a population-based retrospective cohort study that aims to evaluate the characteristics of stage III/IV NSCLC patients and their journey in the Brazilian private healthcare system. Patients aged ≥18 years, residing in Brazil who had their first medical appointment between 2016 and 2018 were included in the study. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients and time intervals of interest were described. A total of 10,394 patients were analyzed. The majority of the patients were male (58.5%) with a median age of 64.0 (IQR = 58.0 - 71.0) years. In relation to characteristics of the disease, most of the tumors were characterized as adenocarcinomas (52.3%) and diagnosed at stage IV (72.2%). Most patients arrived at the hospital with an established NSCLC diagnosis, while 45.7% were diagnosed at the first medical appointment in the hospital or later. For patients who were diagnosed at the first medical appointment or later, a median interval of 15.0 (IQR = 6.0 - 33.0) days was observed between the first medical appointment and the diagnosis. The first treatment was given after a median of 25.0 (IQR = 6.0 - 49.0) days after diagnosis for patients without a prior diagnosis, and 57.0 (IQR: 33.0 - 98.0) days for patients with a prior diagnosis. The most common treatments were chemotherapy alone (33.8%), chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy (21.5%), radiotherapy alone (13.1%), adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment (9.3%), surgery (3.3%), and immunotherapy (0.7%; alone or combined). At the end of follow-up (September, 2020), 52.3% of the patients had died. Despite having more treatment options in the private sector, data show that there is a need to improve access to technologies.

Factors associated with late-stage diagnosis and overall survival for lung cancer: An analysis of patients treated in a Brazilian hospital and a US-hospital from 2009 to 2019

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is a major public health problem due to its high incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Histology, socioeconomic conditions, access, quality of healthcare, and regional aspects are associated with lung cancer stages at diagnosis and survival outcomes. This paper aims to examine and contrast the factors associated with late-stage diagnosis of lung cancer and overall survival rates in two different settings: a Brazilian hospital and a US hospital, spanning from 2009 to 2019.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of the incidence of lung cancer cases at the institution's cancer registry from a Brazilian and a US-based cohort. Descriptive analyses are presented using either the mean and standard deviation or the median and interquartile interval. Frequency is used to present categorical variables. Factors associated with late-stage lung cancer diagnosis were identified through bivariate and multivariable forward stepwise logistic regression. One-year overall survival and its associated factors were identified by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox's proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Between January 2009 and December 2019, a total of 5286 individuals were diagnosed with LC in the Brazilian cohort, and out of these cases, 85.6% were diagnosed with late-stage disease. The US-cohort consisted of 3594 individuals, of whom 60.3% were diagnosed with late-stage disease in lung cancer. The one-year overall survival was 8.6 months for the US cohort and 6.4 months for the Brazilian cohort. In both cohorts, late-stage diagnosis emerged as the most significant factor influencing overall survival. However, the factors associated with late-stage diagnosis differed between the US and Brazilian cohorts. In the Brazilian cohort, being male and belonging to black or brown ethnic groups, along with having a lower education level, were linked to late-stage diagnosis. On the other hand, in the US-based cohort, the factors related to late-stage diagnosis were being male, having been diagnosed before 2015, and possessing private insurance coverage.

CONCLUSION

Late-stage diagnosis was associated with the worst survival in both the US and Brazilian cohorts. This study provides valuable information on inequities and barriers to access for lung patients with cancer from upper-middle-income and high-income countries.

The global burden of lung cancer: current status and future trends

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. However, lung cancer incidence and mortality rates differ substantially across the world, reflecting varying patterns of tobacco smoking, exposure to environmental risk factors and genetics. Tobacco smoking is the leading risk factor for lung cancer. Lung cancer incidence largely reflects trends in smoking patterns, which generally vary by sex and economic development. For this reason, tobacco control campaigns are a central part of global strategies designed to reduce lung cancer mortality. Environmental and occupational lung cancer risk factors, such as unprocessed biomass fuels, asbestos, arsenic and radon, can also contribute to lung cancer incidence in certain parts of the world. Over the past decade, large-cohort clinical studies have established that low-dose CT screening reduces lung cancer mortality, largely owing to increased diagnosis and treatment at earlier disease stages. These data have led to recommendations that individuals with a high risk of lung cancer undergo screening in several economically developed countries and increased implementation of screening worldwide. In this Review, we provide an overview of the global epidemiology of lung cancer. Lung cancer risk factors and global risk reduction efforts are also discussed. Finally, we summarize lung cancer screening policies and their implementation worldwide.

Exploring regional disparities in lung cancer mortality in a Brazilian state: A cross-sectional ecological study

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer (LC) is one of the main causes of mortality in Brazil; geographic, cultural, socioeconomic and health access factors can affect the development of the disease. We explored the geospatial distribution of LC mortality, and associated factors, between 2015 and 2019, in Parana state, Brazil.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We obtained mortality (from the Brazilian Health Informatics Department) and population rates (from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics [IBGE]) in people over 40 years old, accessibility of oncology centers by municipality, disease diagnosis rate (from Brazilian Ministry of Health), the tobacco production rate (IBGE) and Parana Municipal Performance Index (IPDM) (from Parana Institute for Economic and Social Development). Global Moran's Index and Local Indicators of Spatial Association were performed to evaluate the spatial distribution of LC mortality in Parana state. Ordinary Least Squares Regression and Geographically Weighted Regression were used to verify spatial association between LC mortality and socioeconomic indicators and health service coverage. A strong spatial autocorrelation of LC mortality was observed, with the detection of a large cluster of high LC mortality in the South of Parana state. Spatial regression analysis showed that all independent variables analyzed were directly related to LC mortality by municipality in Paraná.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a disparity in the LC mortality in Parana state, and inequality of socioeconomic and accessibility to health care services could be associated with it. Our findings may help health managers to intensify actions in regions with vulnerability in the detection and treatment of LC.

Application of several machine learning algorithms for the prediction of afatinib treatment outcome in advanced-stage EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of several machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting 1-year afatinib continuation and 2-year survival after afatinib initiation and to identify the differences in survival outcomes between ML-classified strata.

METHODS

Data that were also used in the RESET study were retrospectively collected from 16 hospitals in South Korea. A stratified random sampling method was applied to split the data into training and test sets (70:30 split ratio). Clinical information, such as age, sex, tumor stage, smoking, performance status, metastasis, type of metastasis, dose adjustment, and pathologic information on EGFR mutations were inputted. Training was performed using eight ML algorithms: logistic regression, decision tree, deep neural network, random forest, support vector machine, boosting, bagging, and the naïve Bayes classifier. The model performance was assessed based on sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated and compared between the ML models using DeLong's test. A Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve was used to visualize the identified strata obtained from the ML models.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the input variables were observed between the training and test datasets. The best-performing models were support vector machine in predicting 1-year afatinib continuation (AUC 0.626) and decision tree in 2-year survival after afatinib start (AUC 0.644), although the performances of the ML models were comparable and did not display any predictive roles. KM analysis and log-rank test revealed significant differences between the strata identified from the ML model (p < 0.001) in terms of both time-on-treatment (TOT) and overall survival (OS).

CONCLUSION

The performances of ML models in our study found no discernible roles in predicting afatinib-related outcomes, although the identified strata revealed different TOT and OS in the KM analysis. This implies the strength of ML in predicting the survival outcome, as well as the limitation of electronic medical record-based variables in ML algorithms. Careful consideration of variable inclusion is likely to improve the general model performance.

Real-World Evidence of Health Outcomes Related to Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Brazil

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective option for patients with both early-stage and oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data from Latin America are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the real-world outcomes of applying SBRT for lung lesions in a Brazilian institution.

METHODS

This study investigated a consecutive cohort of patients treated with SBRT for lung lesions (primary and metastasis). The study primary outcome was local control rates per lesion. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2019, a total of 216 patients received SBRT and were included in the study. The median follow-up was 24.5 months (5-70), primary NSCLC corresponded to 70% (n = 151) and nonprimary lung lesions to 30% (n = 65), respectively. Stage I NSCLC represented 56% (85 of 151) of the NSCLC cohort. The average number of fractions and total dose prescribed was 5 (3-10)/59 Gy (50-62 Gy). For stage I NSCLC (all lesions treated with a biologically effective dose [10] > 100 Gy), 2-year local control, OS, and PFS were 93.4%, 81.6%, and 80.7%, respectively. For stage IV lesions, if biologically effective dose (10) > 100 Gy or < 100 Gy, 2-year local control was 95.8/86.4% (P = .03), 2-year-OS was 81.6/60.5% (P = .006), and 2-year PFS was 38.9/17.9% (P = .10). Late toxicity was observed in 16.2% (n = 35) of the total cases.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that SBRT is effective (high local control and acceptable toxicity) for treating malignant lung lesions in a real-world scenario in Latin America.

Lung Cancer Management in Low and Middle-Income Countries

Lung cancer is an increasing problem in the developing world due to rising trends in smoking, high incidence of air pollution, lack of awareness and screening, delayed presentation, and diagnosis at the advanced stage. Even after diagnosis, there are disparities in access to health care facilities and inequitable distribution of resources and treatment options. In addition, the shortage of trained personnel and infrastructure adds to the challenges faced by patients with lung cancer in these regions. A multi-pronged effort targeting tobacco cessation, health promotion and awareness, capacity building, and value-based care are the need of the hour.

Barriers to Access: Global Variability in Implementing Treatment Advances in Lung Cancer

Globally, lung cancer is the second most-diagnosed cancer and is the leading cause of cancer death. Advances in science and technology have contributed to improvements in primary cancer prevention, cancer diagnosis, and cancer therapy, leading to an increase in survival and improvement in quality of life. Many of these advances have been seen in high-income countries. Accessibility, availability, and affordability are key domains in barriers to access of care between countries and within countries. The impact of these domains, as they relate to molecular testing, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy, are discussed.

Patient-centered outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-world perspective

Aims: To assess non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient-centered outcomes in the real world. Methods: This is a prospective study of NSCLC patients treated at a private cancer care institution in Brazil between 2014 and 2019. Results: The report comprises 337 patients. Advanced stage was associated with higher symptom burden - fatigue (p = 0.03), pain (p < 0.001) and arm pain (p = 0.022) - and worse global, social and physical functioning (all p < 0.001). In the first 2 years, most factors evolved to either improvement or stability: cough (p = 0.02), pain (p = 0.002), global functioning (p < 0.001) and emotional functioning (p < 0.001). Staging (p < 0.001), fatigue (p = 0.001) and gender (p = 0.004) were independently associated with overall survival. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the feasibility of conducting real-world prospective analysis of patient-centered outcomes.

Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a discussion on its implementation in the Brazilian clinical practice

The objective of this review is to address the barriers limiting access to next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in Brazil and to propose its implementation in practice. A selected panel of lung cancer experts was provided with relevant prompts to address at a conference; a paper was then compiled on the topic. The authors propose specific and realistic recommendations for implementing access to ctDNA NGS. Further, the authors address all barriers and impediments mentioned within this review. There is a great need to increase ctDNA NGS for cancer care in Brazil. Adapting the current cancer testing framework is essential to expanding the use of this tool.