Harmonization and Standardization of Panel-Based Tumor Mutational Burden Measurement: Real-World Results and Recommendations of the Quality in Pathology Study

Leveraging Off-Target Reads in Panel Sequencing for Homologous Recombination Repair Deficiency Screening in Tumor

Targeted tumor only sequencing has become a standard practice in cancer diagnostics. This study aims to develop an approach for robust copy number variant calling in tumor samples using only off-target region (OTR) reads. We also established a clinical use case for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score estimation (HRDest) using the sum of telomeric-allelic imbalance and large-scale state transition scores without the need for loss of heterozygosity information. A strong correlation was found between HRD score and the sum of telomeric-allelic imbalance + large-scale state transition in The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort (ρ = 0.99, P < 2.2 × 10-16) and in a clinical in-house cohort of 34 tumors (ρ = 0.9, P = 5.1 × 10-13) comparing whole-exome sequencing and targeted sequencing data. HRDest scores from 1086 clinical cases were compared with The Cancer Genome Atlas data set. There were no significant differences in HRD score distribution within the analyzed tumor types. As a control, commercially available HRD standards were also sequenced, and the HRDest scores obtained from the OTR reads were well within the HRD reference range provided by the manufacturer. In conclusion, OTR reads of tumor-only panel sequencing can be used to determine genome-wide copy number variant profiles and to approximate HRD scores.

Harmonizing tumor mutational burden analysis: Insights from a multicenter study using in silico reference data sets in clinical whole-exome sequencing (WES)

OBJECTIVES

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a significant biomarker for predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor response, but the clinical performance of whole-exome sequencing (WES)-based TMB estimation has received less attention compared to panel-based methods. This study aimed to assess the reliability and comparability of WES-based TMB analysis among laboratories under routine testing conditions.

METHODS

A multicenter study was conducted involving 24 laboratories in China using in silico reference data sets. The accuracy and comparability of TMB estimation were evaluated using matched tumor-normal data sets. Factors such as accuracy of variant calls, limit of detection (LOD) of WES test, size of regions of interest (ROIs) used for TMB calculation, and TMB cutoff points were analyzed.

RESULTS

The laboratories consistently underestimated the expected TMB scores in matched tumor-normal samples, with only 50% falling within the ±30% TMB interval. Samples with low TMB score (<2.5) received the consensus interpretation. Accuracy of variant calls, LOD of the WES test, ROI, and TMB cutoff points were important factors causing interlaboratory deviations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights real-world challenges in WES-based TMB analysis that need to be improved and optimized. This research will aid in the selection of more reasonable analytical procedures to minimize potential methodologic biases in estimating TMB in clinical exome sequencing tests. Harmonizing TMB estimation in clinical testing conditions is crucial for accurately evaluating patients' response to immunotherapy.

[Molecular pathological analysis through the ages]

BACKGROUND

Molecular pathological examinations of tumor samples encompass a wide range of diagnostic analyses. Especially in recent years, numerous new biomarkers have come to the forefront-the analysis of which is crucial for therapy decisions.

OBJECTIVES

Within the field of molecular pathology, the demands of next generation sequencing (NGS)-based requirements have experienced massive growth in recent years. To meet this demand, methods are constantly being adapted and further developed. The following sections aim to illuminate how this trend arises and which analyses are gaining importance.

METHODS

The article provides an overview of the essential nucleic acid-based analysis techniques in the field of massive parallel sequencing. Terms such as DNA- and RNA-based techniques, as well as the associated analysis methods, are described, particularly with regard to their use in routine molecular pathological diagnostics.

RESULTS

The breadth of genomic sequencing has been steadily growing in recent years, particularly due to the increasing relevance of personalized medicine, along with the rising approvals of targeted therapeutics. This necessitates, among other things, the analysis of new biomarkers. The diagnostics as part of interdisciplinary molecular tumor boards (MTB) are now based on large gene panels (> 1 megabase). Furthermore, through the "Modellvorhaben Genomsequenzierung" § 64e, whole exome or whole genome sequencing has been made available for oncological patients. Given these developments, it is evident that future analyses will require the integration of additional omics fields, such as whole transcriptome analysis, epigenomics, and proteomics.

CONCLUSION

The challenges of personalized medicine along with the necessity of simultaneously assessing numerous new biomarkers require the implementation and execution of new techniques in molecular pathology whose complexity is steadily increasing.

A neural-related gene risk score for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to establish a neural-related gene risk score (NRGRS) for the prediction of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma prognosis and explore its predictive value on the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

Based on the transcriptome data of HNSCC patients (n = 546) from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, 37 neural-related hub genes were identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Four genes (ITGA5, PYGM, GNG7 and ATP2A3) were identified to construct NRGRS using Lasso-Cox regression method based on the derivation cohort and validated in the Gene Expression Omnibus cohort (n = 109). The survival analysis was performed to validate the prognostic value of NRGRS and immune characteristics in NRGRS-defined subgroups were analyzed.

RESULTS

NRGRS-high patients had a worse overall survival than NRGRS-low patients. Tumors with high NRGRS were more likely to have high infiltration of naive CD4+ T cells, M0, M2 macrophages and resting mast cells, which illustrated suppressive immunity and less benefit from immunotherapy therapy.

CONCLUSION

NRGRS strongly correlates with survival and is a promising biomarker to predict immunotherapy benefits for head and neck cancer patients. This study provides evidence for the potential correlation between neural-related transcriptome alteration and immune activity.

High Concordance of Different Assays in the Determination of Homologous Recombination Deficiency-Associated Genomic Instability in Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have shown promising clinical results in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Analysis of biomarker subgroups consistently revealed higher benefits for patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). The test that is most often used for the detection of HRD in clinical studies is the Myriad myChoice assay. However, other assays can also be used to assess biomarkers, which are indicative of HRD, genomic instability (GI), and BRCA1/2 mutation status. Many of these assays have high potential to be broadly applied in clinical routine diagnostics in a time-effective decentralized manner. Here, we compare the performance of a multitude of alternative assays in comparison with Myriad myChoice in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC).

METHODS

DNA from HGSOC samples was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of cases previously run with the Myriad myChoice assay, and GI was measured by multiple molecular assays (CytoSNP, AmoyDx, Illumina TSO500 HRD, OncoScan, NOGGO GISv1, QIAseq HRD Panel and whole genome sequencing), applying different bioinformatics algorithms.

RESULTS

Application of different assays to assess GI, including Myriad myChoice, revealed high concordance of the generated scores ranging from very substantial to nearly perfect fit, depending on the assay and bioinformatics pipelines applied. Interlaboratory comparison of assays also showed high concordance of GI scores.

CONCLUSION

Assays for GI assessment not only show a high concordance with each other but also in correlation with Myriad myChoice. Thus, almost all of the assays included here can be used effectively to assess HRD-associated GI in the clinical setting. This is important as PARPi treatment on the basis of these tests is compliant with European Medicines Agency approvals, which are methodologically not test-bound.

Tumor mutational burden assessment and standardized bioinformatics approach using custom NGS panels in clinical routine

BACKGROUND

High tumor mutational burden (TMB) was reported to predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1, received FDA-approval for the treatment of unresectable/metastatic tumors with high TMB as determined by the FoundationOne®CDx test. It remains to be determined how TMB can also be calculated using other tests.

RESULTS

FFPE/frozen tumor samples from various origins were sequenced in the frame of the Institut Curie (IC) Molecular Tumor Board using an in-house next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. A TMB calculation method was developed at IC (IC algorithm) and compared to the FoundationOne® (FO) algorithm. Using IC algorithm, an optimal 10% variant allele frequency (VAF) cut-off was established for TMB evaluation on FFPE samples, compared to 5% on frozen samples. The median TMB score for MSS/POLE WT tumors was 8.8 mut/Mb versus 45 mut/Mb for MSI/POLE-mutated tumors. When focusing on MSS/POLE WT tumor samples, the highest median TMB scores were observed in lymphoma, lung, endometrial, and cervical cancers. After biological manual curation of these cases, 21% of them could be reclassified as MSI/POLE tumors and considered as "true TMB high." Higher TMB values were obtained using FO algorithm on FFPE samples compared to IC algorithm (40 mut/Mb [10-3927] versus 8.2 mut/Mb [2.5-897], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We herein propose a TMB calculation method and a bioinformatics tool that is customizable to different NGS panels and sample types. We were not able to retrieve TMB values from FO algorithm using our own algorithm and NGS panel.

Harmonization of tumor mutation burden testing with comprehensive genomic profiling assays: an IQN Path initiative

BACKGROUND

Although conflicting results emerged from different studies, the tumor mutational burden (TMB) appears as one of most reliable biomarkers of sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Several laboratories are reporting TMB values when performing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) without providing a clinical interpretation, due to the lack of validated cut-off values. The International Quality Network for Pathology launched an initiative to harmonize TMB testing with CGP assay and favor the clinical implementation of this biomarker.

METHODS

TMB evaluation was performed with three commercially available CGP panels, TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500), Oncomine Comprehensive Plus Assay (OCA) and QIAseq Multimodal Panel (QIA), versus the reference assay FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx). Archived clinical samples derived from 60 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were used for TMB assessment. Adjusted cut-off values for each panel were calculated.

RESULTS

Testing was successful for 91.7%, 100%, 96.7% and 100% of cases using F1CDx, TSO500, OCA and QIA, respectively. The matrix comparison analysis, between the F1CDx and CGP assays, showed a linear correlation for all three panels, with a higher correlation between F1CDx and TSO500 (rho=0.88) than in the other two comparisons (rho=0.77 for QIA; 0.72 for OCA). The TSO500 showed the best area under the curve (AUC, value 0.96), with a statistically significant difference when compared with the AUC of OCA (0.83, p value=0.01) and QIA (0.88, p value=0.028). The Youden Index calculation allowed us to extrapolate TMB cut-offs of the different panels corresponding to the 10 mutations/megabase (muts/Mb) cut-off of F1CDx: 10.19, 10.4 and 12.37 muts/Mb for TSO500, OCA and QIA, respectively. Using these values, we calculated the relative accuracy measures for the three panels. TSO500 showed 86% specificity and 96% sensitivity, while OCA and QIA had lower yet similar values of specificity and sensitivity (73% and 88%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study estimated TMB cut-off values for commercially available CGP panels. The results showed a good performance of all panels on clinical samples and the calculated cut-offs support better accuracy measures for TSO500. The validated cut-off values can drive clinical interpretation of TMB testing in clinical research and clinical practice.

Enhancing the quality of panel-based tumor mutation burden assessment: a comprehensive study of real-world and in-silico outcomes

Targeted panel-based tumor mutation burden (TMB) assays are widely employed to guide immunotherapy for patients with solid tumors. However, the accuracy and consistency of this method can be compromised due to the variability in technical details across different laboratories, particularly in terms of panel size, somatic mutation detection and TMB calculation rules. Currently, systematic evaluations of the impact of these technical factors on existing assays and best practice recommendations remain lacking. We assessed the performance of 50 participating panel-based TMB assays involving 38 unique methods using cell line samples. In silico experiments utilizing TCGA MC3 datasets were performed to further dissect the impact of technical factors. Here we show that the panel sizes beyond 1.04 Mb and 389 genes are necessary for the basic discrete accuracy, as determined by over 40,000 synthetic panels. The somatic mutation detection should maintain a reciprocal gap of recall and precision less than 0.179 for reliable psTMB calculation results. The inclusion of synonymous, nonsense and hotspot mutations could enhance the accuracy of panel-based TMB assay. A 5% variant allele frequency cut-off is suitable for TMB assays using tumor samples with at least 20% tumor purity. In conclusion, this multicenter study elucidates the major technical factors as sources of variability in panel-based TMB assays and proposed comprehensive recommendations for the enhancement of accuracy and consistency. These findings will assist clinical laboratories in optimizing the methodological details through bioinformatic experiments to enhance the reliability of panel-based methods.

m6A and m5C modification of GPX4 facilitates anticancer immunity via STING activation

Cancer immunotherapy is arguably the most rapidly advancing realm of cancer treatment. Glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) has emerged as the vital enzyme to prevent lipid peroxidation and maintain cellular redox homeostasis. However, the mechanism of GPX4 in the regulation of cancer immunotherapy of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) are incompletely understood. In pan-cancer analysis, we found that GPX4 showed remarkably upregulated expression and exhibited significant association with overall survival in multiple cancer types, especially COAD. Furthermore, upregulated GPX4 expression was positively correlated with increased immune cells infiltration and enhanced expression of immunomodulators. Mechanistically, RBM15B- and IGFBP2-mediated N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification and NSUN5-mediated 5-methylcytosine (m5C) modification of GPX4 facilitated anticancer immunity via activation of cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon (STING) signaling by maintaining redox homeostasis in COAD. The risk model and nomogram model constructed based on the GPX4-derived genes further confirmed the prognostic and treatment-guiding value of GPX4. In all, our study demonstrated that m6A and m5C modification of GPX4 may be a promising target for cancer immunotherapy via activating the cGAS-STING signaling pathway in COAD.

Biomarkers and experimental models for cancer immunology investigation

The rapid advancement of tumor immunotherapies poses challenges for the tools used in cancer immunology research, highlighting the need for highly effective biomarkers and reproducible experimental models. Current immunotherapy biomarkers encompass surface protein markers such as PD-L1, genetic features such as microsatellite instability, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and biomarkers in liquid biopsy such as circulating tumor DNAs. Experimental models, ranging from 3D in vitro cultures (spheroids, submerged models, air-liquid interface models, organ-on-a-chips) to advanced 3D bioprinting techniques, have emerged as valuable platforms for cancer immunology investigations and immunotherapy biomarker research. By preserving native immune components or coculturing with exogenous immune cells, these models replicate the tumor microenvironment in vitro. Animal models like syngeneic models, genetically engineered models, and patient-derived xenografts provide opportunities to study in vivo tumor-immune interactions. Humanized animal models further enable the simulation of the human-specific tumor microenvironment. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the advantages, limitations, and prospects of different biomarkers and experimental models, specifically focusing on the role of biomarkers in predicting immunotherapy outcomes and the ability of experimental models to replicate the tumor microenvironment. By integrating cutting-edge biomarkers and experimental models, this review serves as a valuable resource for accessing the forefront of cancer immunology investigation.

Nivolumab and ipilimumab in recurrent or refractory cancer of unknown primary: a phase II trial

Cancer of unknown primary has a dismal prognosis, especially following failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. 10-20% of patients have a high tumor mutational burden (TMB), which predicts response to immunotherapy in many cancer types. In this prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter Phase II trial (EudraCT 2018-004562-33; NCT04131621), patients relapsed or refractory after platinum-based chemotherapy received nivolumab and ipilimumab following TMBhigh vs. TMBlow stratification. Progression-free survival (PFS) represented the primary endpoint; overall survival (OS), response rates, duration of clinical benefit and safety were the secondary endpoints. The trial was prematurely terminated in March 2021 before reaching the preplanned sample size (n = 194). Among 31 evaluable patients, 16% had a high TMB ( > 12 mutations/Mb). Overall response rate was 16% (95% CI 6-34%), with 7.7% (95% CI 1-25%) vs. 60% (95% CI 15-95%) in TMBlow and TMBhigh, respectively. Although the primary endpoint was not met, high TMB was associated with better median PFS (18.3 vs. 2.4 months) and OS (18.3 vs. 3.6 months). Severe immune-related adverse events were reported in 29% of cases. Assessing on-treatment dynamics of circulating tumor DNA using combined targeted hotspot mutation and shallow whole genome sequencing as part of a predefined exploratory analysis identified patients benefiting from immunotherapy irrespective of initial radiologic response.

Multicentric pilot study to standardize clinical whole exome sequencing (WES) for cancer patients

A growing number of druggable targets and national initiatives for precision oncology necessitate broad genomic profiling for many cancer patients. Whole exome sequencing (WES) offers unbiased analysis of the entire coding sequence, segmentation-based detection of copy number alterations (CNAs), and accurate determination of complex biomarkers including tumor mutational burden (TMB), homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), and microsatellite instability (MSI). To assess the inter-institution variability of clinical WES, we performed a comparative pilot study between German Centers of Personalized Medicine (ZPMs) from five participating institutions. Tumor and matched normal DNA from 30 patients were analyzed using custom sequencing protocols and bioinformatic pipelines. Calling of somatic variants was highly concordant with a positive percentage agreement (PPA) between 91 and 95% and a positive predictive value (PPV) between 82 and 95% compared with a three-institution consensus and full agreement for 16 of 17 druggable targets. Explanations for deviations included low VAF or coverage, differing annotations, and different filter protocols. CNAs showed overall agreement in 76% for the genomic sequence with high wet-lab variability. Complex biomarkers correlated strongly between institutions (HRD: 0.79-1, TMB: 0.97-0.99) and all institutions agreed on microsatellite instability. This study will contribute to the development of quality control frameworks for comprehensive genomic profiling and sheds light onto parameters that require stringent standardization.

Gene Expressions and High Lymphocyte Count May Predict Durable Clinical Benefits in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Not all patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, we aimed to assess the predictive potential of gene expression profiling (GEP), peripheral immune cell counts, and clinical characteristics.

METHODS

The primary endpoint of this prospective, observational study was a durable clinical benefit (DCB) defined as progression-free survival >6 months. In a subgroup with histological biopsies of sufficient quality (n = 25), GEP was performed using the nCounter® PanCancer IO 360 panel.

RESULTS

DCB was observed in 49% of 123 included patients. High absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and absence of liver metastases were associated with DCB (OR = 1.95, p = 0.038 and OR = 0.36, p = 0.046, respectively). GEP showed clustering of differentially expressed genes according to DCB, and a strong association between PD-L1 assessed by GEP (CD274) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) was observed (p = 0.00013). The TGF-β, dendritic cell, and myeloid signature scores were higher for patients without DCB, whereas the JAK/STAT loss signature scores were higher for patients with DCB (unadjusted p-values < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ALC above 1.01 × 109/L and absence of liver metastases were significantly associated with DCB in ICI-treated patients with NSCLC. GEP was only feasible in 20% of the patients. GEP-derived signatures may be associated with clinical outcomes, and PD-L1 could be assessed by GEP rather than IHC.

Actionable molecular alterations in newly diagnosed and recurrent IDH1/2 wild-type glioblastoma patients and therapeutic implications: a large mono-institutional experience using extensive next-generation sequencing analysis

BACKGROUND

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels enable the identification of alterations in cancer-related genes. This may guide a molecularly targeted strategy for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data obtained using FoundationOne®CDx in a large cohort of IDH1/2 wild-type GBM. We aimed to 1) identify potentially actionable molecular alterations at diagnosis and/or recurrence based on ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) defined categories of targetability, 2) understand the clinical implications of NGS in terms of access to and activity of targeted therapies.

RESULTS

In 442 samples, an NGS profile was available in 98.2%. The median time from diagnosis to NGS profiling was 7.4 months (interquartile range (IQR): 3.4-13.2). Although about half of the patients had at least one actionable molecular alteration, only 3.4% of them were classified as ESCAT IB-IC and 6.7% as ESCAT IIB. Only 36 patients (10.5%) received personalised treatment in clinical trials or as off-label/compassionate use from second-line (median line 3). Most patients did not receive targeted therapy due to clinical deterioration/death (49.6%). Patients treated with dabrafenib/trametinib (9 patients) had the highest disease control rate of 77% and an objective response rate of 22%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.2 months. No complete/partial responses were seen with the other regimens. 4/9 (44.4%) patients on anti-BRAF/anti-MEK, 2/4 patients (50%) on erdafitinib and 1/1 patient on capmatinib had a PFS ratio > 1.3. One recurrent GBM patient with ROS1-GOCP fusion maintained a complete response for 11.3 months on entrectinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated the feasibility of NGS in GBM samples. As the number of clinically relevant targets was limited and only a small group of GBM patients were treated with targeted therapy, NGS testing should be performed in the context of clinical trials. Our results support the activity of anti-BRAF/anti-MEK, while for the other agents prospective study results are needed to draw solid conclusions.

Reliability of panel-based mutational signatures for immune-checkpoint-inhibition efficacy prediction in non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Mutational signatures (MS) are gaining traction for deriving therapeutic insights for immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). We asked if MS attributions from comprehensive targeted sequencing assays are reliable enough for predicting ICI efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Somatic mutations of m = 126 patients were assayed using panel-based sequencing of 523 cancer-related genes. In silico simulations of MS attributions for various panels were performed on a separate dataset of m = 101 whole genome sequenced patients. Non-synonymous mutations were deconvoluted using COSMIC v3.3 signatures and used to test a previously published machine learning classifier.

RESULTS

The ICI efficacy predictor performed poorly with an accuracy of 0.51-0.09+0.09, average precision of 0.52-0.11+0.11, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.50-0.09+0.10. Theoretical arguments, experimental data, and in silico simulations pointed to false negative rates (FNR) related to panel size. A secondary effect was observed, where deconvolution of small ensembles of point mutations lead to reconstruction errors and misattributions.

CONCLUSION

MS attributions from current targeted panel sequencing are not reliable enough to predict ICI efficacy. We suggest that, for downstream classification tasks in NSCLC, signature attributions be based on whole exome or genome sequencing instead.

Graph-ETMB: A graph neural network-based model for tumour mutation burden estimation

As a critical indicator of how easily the human immune system recognizes tumour cells, tumour mutational burden (TMB) is widely used to identify the potential effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. However, the difficulties associated with the whole exome sequencing (WES) process, such as high tissue sampling requirements, high costs, and long turnaround times, have hindered the widespread clinical use of WES. Furthermore, the mutation landscape varies across cancer types, and the distribution of TMBs varies across cancer subtypes. Therefore, there is an urgent clinical need to develop a small cancer-specific panel to estimate TMB accurately, predict immunotherapy response cost-effectively and assist physicians in precise decision-making. This paper uses a graph neural network framework (Graph-ETMB) to address the cancer specificity problem in TMB. The correlation and tractability between mutated genes are described through message-passing and aggregation algorithms between graph networks. Then the graph neural network is trained in the lung adenocarcinoma data through a semi-supervised approach, resulting in a mutation panel containing 20 genes with a length of only 0.16 Mb. The number of genes to be detected is smaller than most commercial panels currently in clinical use. In addition, the efficacy of the designed panel in predicting immunotherapy response was further determined in an independent validation dataset, exploring the association between TMB and immunotherapy efficacy.

Predictive Biomarkers for Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has one of the highest mortality rates among solid cancers. Late diagnosis and a lack of efficacious treatment options contribute to the dismal prognosis of HCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy has presented a new milestone in the treatment of cancer. Immunotherapy has yielded remarkable treatment responses in a range of cancer types including HCC. Based on the therapeutic effect of ICI alone (programmed cell death (PD)-1/programmed death-ligand1 (PD-L)1 antibody), investigators have developed combined ICI therapies including ICI + ICI, ICI + tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and ICI + locoregional treatment or novel immunotherapy. Although these regimens have demonstrated increasing treatment efficacy with the addition of novel drugs, the development of biomarkers to predict toxicity and treatment response in patients receiving ICI is in urgent need. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells received the most attention in early studies among various predictive biomarkers. However, PD-L1 expression alone has limited utility as a predictive biomarker in HCC. Accordingly, subsequent studies have evaluated the utility of tumor mutational burden (TMB), gene signatures, and multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) as predictive biomarkers. In this review, we aim to discuss the current state of immunotherapy for HCC, the results of the predictive biomarker studies, and future direction.

Benchmarking bioinformatics approaches for tumour mutational burden evaluation from a large cancer panel against whole-exome sequencing

Tumour mutational burden (TMB) is used to predict response to immunotherapies. Although several groups have proposed calculation methods for TMB, a clear consensus has not yet emerged. In this study, we explored TMB calculation approaches with a 586-gene cancer panel (1.75 Mb) benchmarked to TMB measured by whole-exome sequencing (WES), using 30 samples across a range of tumour types. We explored variant allelic fraction (VAF) cut-offs of 5% and 10%, population database filtering at 0.001, 0.0001 and 0.000025, as well as different combinations of synonymous, insertion/deletion and intronic (splice site) variants, as well as exclusion of hotspot mutations, and examined the effect on TMB correlation. Good correlation (Spearman, range 0.66-0.78) between WES and panel TMB was seen across all methods evaluated. Each method of TMB calculation evaluated showed good positive per cent agreement and negative per cent agreement using 10 mutations/Mb as a cut-off, suggesting that multiple TMB calculation approaches may yield comparable results.

Predicting response to immune checkpoint blockade in NSCLC with tumour-only RNA-seq

BACKGROUND

Targeted RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) from FFPE specimens is used clinically in cancer for its ability to estimate gene expression and to detect fusions. Using a cohort of NSCLC patients, we sought to determine whether targeted RNA-seq could be used to measure tumour mutational burden (TMB) and the expression of immune-cell-restricted genes from FFPE specimens and whether these could predict response to immune checkpoint blockade.

METHODS

Using The Cancer Genome Atlas LUAD dataset, we developed a method for determining TMB from tumour-only RNA-seq and showed a correlation with DNA sequencing derived TMB calculated from tumour/normal sample pairs (Spearman correlation = 0.79, 95% CI [0.73, 0.83]. We applied this method to targeted sequencing data from our patient cohort and validated these results against TMB estimates obtained using an orthogonal assay (Spearman correlation = 0.49, 95% CI [0.24, 0.68]).

RESULTS

We observed that the RNA measure of TMB was significantly higher in responders to immune blockade treatment (P = 0.028) and that it was predictive of response (AUC = 0.640 with 95% CI [0.493, 0.786]). By contrast, the expression of immune-cell-restricted genes was uncorrelated with patient outcome.

CONCLUSION

TMB calculated from targeted RNA sequencing has a similar diagnostic ability to TMB generated from targeted DNA sequencing.

The Driverless Triple-Wild-Type (BRAF, RAS, KIT) Cutaneous Melanoma: Whole Genome Sequencing Discoveries

The genetic makeup of the triple-wild-type melanoma (BRAF, NRAS and NF1) has been known for some time, but those studies grouped together rare histopathological versions with common ones, as well as mucosal and even uveal ones. Here we used whole genome sequencing to genetically characterize the triple-wild-type melanoma (TWM), termed here as BRAF, RAS and KIT wild type (the most frequent oncogenic drivers of skin melanoma), using the most common histological forms and excluding rare ones. All these tumors except one were clearly induced by UV based on the mutational signature. The tumor mutational burden was low in TWM, except in the NF1 mutant forms, and a relatively high frequency of elevated LOH scores suggested frequent homologue recombination deficiency, but this was only confirmed by the mutation signature in one case. Furthermore, all these TWMs were microsatellite-stabile. In this driverless setting, we revealed rare oncogenic drivers known from melanoma or other cancer types and identified rare actionable tyrosine kinase mutations in NTRK1, RET and VEGFR1. Mutations of TWM identified genes involved in antitumor immunity (negative and positive predictors of immunotherapy), Ca++ and BMP signaling. The two regressed melanomas of this cohort shared a 17-gene mutation signature, containing genes involved in antitumor immunity and several cell surface receptors. Even with this comprehensive genomic approach, a few cases remained driverless, suggesting that unrecognized drivers are hiding among passenger mutations.

Clinical and technical insights of tumour mutational burden in non-small cell lung cancer

Despite the durable responses provided by the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors in advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) without actionable targets in a subset of patients, a large proportion of them will progress after immunotherapy. Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) was the first biomarker approved for immunotherapy, although it has multiple limitations, thus the development of novel biomarkers is an urgent need. Tumour Mutational Burden (TMB) is an emerging biomarker defined as the total number of mutations per coding area of tumour genome. Targeted gene panels have emerged as a cost-effective approach to estimate TMB. However, there is still an unmet need to fully standardize sample requirements, panel size, and bioinformatic pipelines to ensure that TMB is calculated appropriately. In addition, researchers are also evaluating TMB calculation in liquid biopsy. In this work, we summarize the relevant advances and the clinical utility of TMB in NSCLC.

Updates in pathology and molecular diagnostics to inform the evolving landscape of thoracic surgery and oncology

The pathologic assessment of lung cancers provides essential guidance to the surgeon and oncologist who are considering the best treatment strategies for patients with both early and advanced-stage disease. The management of patients with lung cancer is predicated first and foremost on access to an accurate diagnosis, even when the sample size is limited, as is often the case with use of modern, minimally invasive sampling techniques. Once the diagnosis and disease stage are established, predictive biomarker testing may be essential, particularly for those patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) being considered for immunotherapy or genomic biomarker-driven targeted therapy. This review will discuss the best practices for the diagnosis of NSCLC using morphology and immunohistochemistry, thus providing the surgeon with needed information to understand and critically evaluate pathology reports. Controversial and evolving topics including tumor spread through airspaces, evaluation of multiple tumors, and staging based on invasive tumor size will be addressed. Clinical genomic profiling in NSCLC is driven by published guidelines and reflects evidence based on clinical trials and regulatory approvals. In this fast-moving space, surgeons should be aware of the critical immunohistochemical and genomic biomarkers that drive systemic therapy decisions and anticipate when such testing will be required, both to ensure adequate sampling and to advise the pathologist when tumor material will be required for biomarker analysis. The basic approaches to and sample requirements for molecular biomarker testing will be addressed. As biomarker testing moves exclusively from advanced-stage patients into earlier stage disease, the surgeon should be aware of the relevant markers and work with the pathologist and oncologist to ensure that this information is available to facilitate timely access to therapies not just in the advanced setting, but in consideration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant care.

External quality assessment (EQA) for tumor mutational burden: results of an international IQN path feasibility pilot scheme

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has recently been approved as an agnostic biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, methods for TMB testing have not yet been standardized. The International Quality Network for Pathology (IQNPath) organized a pilot external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for TMB testing. The aim of this program was the validation of the materials and the procedures for the EQA of this complex biomarker. Five formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cell lines were selected to mimic the various TMB values observed in clinical practice. The FFPE samples were tested with the FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx) assay as the reference test and three commercially available targeted sequencing panels. Following this internal validation, the five cell lines were sent to 29 laboratories selected on the basis of a previous survey. Nineteen of the 23 laboratories that submitted results (82.6%) used targeted sequencing for TMB estimation. Only two laboratories performed whole exome sequencing (WES) and two assessed TMB by clinical exome. A high variability in the reported TMB values was observed. The variability was higher for samples with the highest TMB value according to the F1CDx test. However, good reproducibility of the TMB score was shown by laboratories using the same panel. The majority of laboratories did not indicate a TMB cut-off value for clinical interpretation. In conclusion, this pilot EQA scheme suggests that it is feasible to run such an EQA program for TMB assessment. However, the results of our pilot highlight the numerous challenges for the standardization of this test.

Tumor Mutational Burden by Whole-Genome Sequencing in Resected NSCLC of Never Smokers

BACKGROUND

Data are scarce about tumor mutational burden (TMB) as a biomarker in never smokers with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

TMB was assessed by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and compared with in silico reduced whole-exome sequencing (WES) and targeted commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panels in 92 paired tumor-normal samples from never smokers who underwent NSCLC resection with curative intent. Analyses were performed to test for association with survival after surgery and to identify the optimal prognostic TMB cutoff.

RESULTS

Tumors of never smokers with NSCLC had low TMB scores (median 1.57 mutations/Mb; range, 0.13-17.94). A TMB cutoff of 1.70 mutations/Mb was associated with a 5-year overall survival of 58% in the high-TMB (42% of cases) compared with 86% in low-TMB patients (Wald P = 0.0029). TMB scores from WGS and WES were highly correlated (Spearman ρ = 0.93, P < 2.2e-16). TMB scores from NGS panels demonstrated high intraindividual fluctuations and identified high-TMB patients with 65% concordance in average compared with WGS.

CONCLUSIONS

In resected NSCLC of never smokers, high TMB was associated with worse prognosis. WES provided a good estimate of TMB while targeted NGS panels seem to lack adequate depth and resolution in the setting of low mutation burden.

IMPACT

TMB is a prognostic indicator of survival in resected NSCLC from individuals who never smoked. In this setting of low mutation counts, TMB can be accurately measured by WGS or WES, but not NGS panels.

Prognostic impact of tumour mutational burden in resected stage I and II lung adenocarcinomas from a European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape cohort

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate tumor mutational burden (TMB), its associations with selected clinicopathological and molecular characteristics as well as its clinical significance, in a retrospective cohort of surgically resected stage I-II lung adenocarcinomas, subset of the ETOP Lungscape cohort.

METHODS

TMB was evaluated on tumor DNA extracted from resected primary lung adenocarcinomas, based on FoundationOne®CDx (F1CDx) genomic profiling, centrally performed at the University Hospital Zurich. The F1CDx test sequences the complete exons of 324 cancer-related genes and detects substitutions, insertions and deletions (indels), copy number alterations and gene rearrangements. In addition, the genomic biomarkers TMB and microsatellite instability (MSI) are analyzed.

RESULTS

In the Lungscape cohort, TMB was assessed in 78 surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas from two Swiss centers (62 % males, 55 %/45 % stage I/II). Median TMB was 7.6 Muts/Mb, with TMB high (≥10 Muts/Mb) in 40 % of cases (95 %CI:29 %-52 %). The most frequently mutated genes were TP53/KRAS/EGFR/MLL2 detected in 58 %/38 %/33 %/30 % of samples, respectively. TMB was significantly higher among males (TMB high: 50 % vs 23 % in females, p = 0.032), as well as among current/former smokers (TMB high: 44 % vs 8 % in never smokers, p = 0.023). Furthermore, TMB was significantly higher in TP53 mutated than in non-mutated patients (TMB high: 60 % vs 12 %, p < 0.001), while it was higher in EGFR non-mutated patients compared to EGFR mutated (TMB high: 48 % vs 23 %, p = 0.049). At a median follow-up time of 56.1 months (IQR:38.8-72.0), none of the three outcome variables (OS, RFS, TTR) differed significantly by TMB status (all p-values > 5 %). This was also true when adjusting for clinicopathological characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

While presence of TP53 mutations and absence of EGFR mutations are associated with high TMB, increased TMB had no significant prognostic impact in patients with resected stage I/II lung adenocarcinoma beyond T and N classification, in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses.

Proceedings From the ASCO/College of American Pathologists Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Predictive Biomarker Summit

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy represents one of the great advances in the field of oncology, highlighted by the Nobel Prize in 2018. Multiple predictive biomarkers for ICI benefit have been proposed. These include assessment of programmed death ligand-1 expression by immunohistochemistry, and determination of mutational genotype (microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiency or tumor mutational burden) as a reflection of neoantigen expression. However, deployment of these assays has been challenging for oncologists and pathologists alike.

METHODS

To address these issues, ASCO and the College of American Pathologists convened a virtual Predictive Factor Summit from September 14 to 15, 2021. Representatives from the academic community, US Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Institutes of Health, health insurance organizations, pharmaceutical companies, in vitro diagnostics manufacturers, and patient advocate organizations presented state-of-the-art predictive factors for ICI, associated problems, and possible solutions.

RESULTS

The Summit provided an overview of the challenges and opportunities for improvement in assay execution, interpretation, and clinical applications of programmed death ligand-1, microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient, and tumor mutational burden-high for ICI therapies, as well as issues related to regulation, reimbursement, and next-generation ICI biomarker development.

CONCLUSION

The Summit concluded with a plan to generate a joint ASCO/College of American Pathologists strategy for consideration of future research in each of these areas to improve tumor biomarker tests for ICI therapy.

Liquid biopsy and non-small cell lung cancer: are we looking at the tip of the iceberg?

The possibility to analyse the tumour genetic material shed in the blood is undoubtedly one of the main achievements of translational research in the latest years. In the modern clinical management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer, molecular characterisation plays an essential role. In parallel, immunotherapy is widely employed, but reliable predictive markers are not available yet. Liquid biopsy has the potential to face the two issues and to increase its role in advanced NSCLC in the next future. The aim of this review is to summarise the main clinical applications of liquid biopsy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, underlining both its potential and limitations from a clinically driven perspective.

Development of a Novel Reference Material for Tumor Mutational Burden Measurement Based on CRISPR/Cas9 Technology

As a biomarker that affects treatment decisions of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the accuracy, reliability, and comparability of tumor mutational burden (TMB) estimation is of paramount importance. To improve the consistency and reliability of these tests, qualified reference materials providing ground-truth data are crucial. In this study, we developed a set of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples with different TMB values as the novel reference materials for TMB estimation. By introducing several clinically relevant variants in MutS Homolog 2 (MSH2) gene and DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene into human cell lines using CRISPR/Cas9 technology, we first constructed four typical cell lines which verified with hypermutator or ultramutator phenotype. Followed by cell mixing and paraffin embedding, the novel FFPE samples were prepared. It was confirmed that our novel FFPE samples have sufficient quantity of cells, high reproducibility, and they can provide matched wild type sample as the genetic background. The double-platform whole exome sequencing validation showed that our FFPE samples were also highly flexible as they containing different TMB values spanning a clinically relevant range (2.0–106.1 mut/Mb). Without limitations on production and TMB values, our novel FFPE samples based on CRISPR/Cas9 editing are suitable as candidate reference materials. From a practical point of view, these samples can be used for the validation, verification, internal quality control, and proficiency testing of TMB assessment.

Open the Technical Black Box of Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB): Factors Affecting Harmonization and Standardization of Panel-Based TMB

As tumor mutational burden (TMB) has been approved as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), next-generation sequencing (NGS) TMB panels are being increasingly used clinically. However, only a few of them have been validated in clinical trials or authorized by administration. The harmonization and standardization of TMB panels are thus essential for clinical implementation. In this review, preanalytic, sequencing, bioinformatics and interpretative factors are summarized to provide a comprehensive picture of how the different factors affect the estimation of panel-based TMB. Among the factors, poor DNA quality, improper formalin fixation and residual germline variants after filtration may overestimate TMB, while low tumor purity may decrease the sensitivity of the TMB panel. In addition, a small panel size leads to more variability when comparing with true TMB values detected by whole-exome sequencing (WES). A panel covering a genomic region of more than 1Mb is more stable for harmonization and standardization. Because the TMB estimate reflects the sum of effects from multiple factors, deliberation based on laboratory and specimen quality, as well as clinical information, is essential for decision making.

Consistency and reproducibility of large panel next-generation sequencing: Multi-laboratory assessment of somatic mutation detection on reference materials with mismatch repair and proofreading deficiency

INTRODUCTION

Clinical precision oncology increasingly relies on accurate genome-wide profiling using large panel next generation sequencing; however, difficulties in accurate and consistent detection of somatic mutation from individual platforms and pipelines remain an open question.

OBJECTIVES

To obtain paired tumor-normal reference materials that can be effectively constructed and interchangeable with clinical samples, and evaluate the performance of 56 panels under routine testing conditions based on the reference samples.

METHODS

Genes involved in mismatch repair and DNA proofreading were knocked down using the CRISPR-Cas9 technology to accumulate somatic mutations in a defined GM12878 cell line. They were used as reference materials to comprehensively evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of detection results of oncopanels and explore the potential influencing factors.

RESULTS

In total, 14 paired tumor-normal reference DNA samples from engineered cell lines were prepared, and a reference dataset comprising 168 somatic mutations in a high-confidence region of 1.8 Mb were generated. For mutations with an allele frequency (AF) of more than 5% in reference samples, 56 panels collectively reported 1306 errors, including 729 false negatives (FNs), 179 false positives (FPs) and 398 reproducibility errors. The performance metric varied among panels with precision and recall ranging from 0.773 to 1 and 0.683 to 1, respectively. Incorrect and inadequate filtering accounted for a large proportion of false discovery (including FNs and FPs), while low-quality detection, cross-contamination and other sequencing errors during the wet bench process were other sources of FNs and FPs. In addition, low AF (<5%) considerably influenced the reproducibility and comparability among panels.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided an integrated practice for developing reference standard to assess oncopanels in detecting somatic mutations and quantitatively revealed the source of detection errors. It will promote optimization, validation, and quality control among laboratories with potential applicability in clinical use.

Harnessing Liquid Biopsies to Guide Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Immunotherapy (IO), involving the use of immune checkpoint inhibition, achieves improved response-rates and significant disease-free survival for some cancer patients. Despite these beneficial effects, there is poor predictability of response and substantial rates of innate or acquired resistance, resulting in heterogeneous responses among patients. In addition, patients can develop life-threatening adverse events, and while these generally occur in patients that also show a tumor response, these outcomes are not always congruent. Therefore, predicting a response to IO is of paramount importance. Traditionally, tumor tissue analysis has been used for this purpose. However, minimally invasive liquid biopsies that monitor changes in blood or other bodily fluid markers are emerging as a promising cost-effective alternative. Traditional biomarkers have limitations mainly due to difficulty in repeatedly obtaining tumor tissue confounded also by the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of tumours. Liquid biopsy has the potential to circumvent tumor heterogeneity and to help identifying patients who may respond to IO, to monitor the treatment dynamically, as well as to unravel the mechanisms of relapse. We present here a review of the current status of molecular markers for the prediction and monitoring of IO response, focusing on the detection of these markers in liquid biopsies. With the emerging improvements in the field of liquid biopsy, this approach has the capacity to identify IO-eligible patients and provide clinically relevant information to assist with their ongoing disease management.

Digital gene expression analysis of NSCLC-patients reveals strong immune pressure, resulting in an immune escape under immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently one of the most promising therapy options in the field of oncology. Although the first pivotal ICI trial results were published in 2011, few biomarkers exist to predict their therapy outcome. PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were proven to be sometimes-unreliable biomarkers. We have previously suggested the analysis of processing escapes, a qualitative measurement of epitope structure alterations under immune system pressure, to provide predictive information on ICI response. Here, we sought to further validate this approach and characterize interactions with different forms of immune pressure.

METHODS

We identified a cohort consisting of 48 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab as ICI monotherapy. Tumor samples were subjected to targeted amplicon-based sequencing using a panel of 22 cancer-associated genes covering 98 mutational hotspots. Altered antigen processing was predicted by NetChop, and MHC binding verified by NetMHC. The NanoString nCounter® platform was utilized to provide gene expression data of 770 immune-related genes. Patient data from 408 patients with NSCLC were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as a validation cohort.

RESULTS

The two immune escape mechanisms of PD-L1 expression (TPS score) (n = 18) and presence of altered antigen processing (n = 10) are mutually non-exclusive and can occur in the same patient (n = 6). Both mechanisms have exclusive influence on different genes and pathways, according to differential gene expression analysis and gene set enrichment analysis, respectively. Interestingly, gene expression patterns associated with altered processing were enriched in T cell and NK cell immune activity. Though both mechanisms influence different genes, they are similarly linked to increased immune activity.

CONCLUSION

Pressure from the immune system will lay the foundations for escape mechanisms, leading to acquisition of resistance under therapy. Both PD-L1 expression and altered antigen processing are induced similarly by pronounced immunoactivity but in different context. The present data help to deepen our understanding of the underlying mechanisms behind those immune escapes.

Biomarkers of response to checkpoint inhibitors beyond PD-L1 in lung cancer

Immunotherapy, including use of checkpoint inhibitors against PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4, forms the backbone of oncologic management for the majority of non-small cell lung carcinoma patients. However, response to these therapies varies widely, from patients who have complete resolution of metastatic disease and long-term remission, to those who rapidly progress and succumb to their cancer despite use of the newest checkpoint inhibitors. While PD-L1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry serves as the principle predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response, neither the sensitivity nor the specificity of this approach is optimal, and clinical PD-L1 testing is plagued by concerns around result reproducibility and confusion born from the proliferation of different companion diagnostic assays. At the same time, insights into tumor and host immune-specific factors that inform both prognosis and response prediction are beginning to define better immunotherapy biomarkers. Beyond immune checkpoint expression status, common themes in analyses of immunotherapy response prediction include cancer neoantigen production, the state of the antigen presentation pathway in both tumor and antigen presenting cells, the admixture of effector and suppressor immune cells in the tumor microenvironment, and the genomic drivers and comutations that can influence the all of these variables. This review will address the state of PD-L1 testing in lung cancer, the role for tumor mutation burden as a predictive biomarker, the evolving status of human leukocyte antigen/major histocompatibility complex expression as a marker of antigen presentation, approaches to tumor immune cell quantitation including by multiplex immunofluorescence, and the importance of tumor genomic profiling to ascertain oncogenic driver (EGFR, ALK, KRAS, MET, etc.) and co-mutation (STK11, KEAP1, SMARCA4) status.

Aligning tumor mutational burden (TMB) quantification across diagnostic platforms: phase II of the Friends of Cancer Research TMB Harmonization Project

BACKGROUND

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) measurements aid in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from immunotherapy; however, there is empirical variability across panel assays and factors contributing to this variability have not been comprehensively investigated. Identifying sources of variability can help facilitate comparability across different panel assays, which may aid in broader adoption of panel assays and development of clinical applications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine tumor samples and 10 human-derived cell lines were processed and distributed to 16 laboratories; each used their own bioinformatics pipelines to calculate TMB and compare to whole exome results. Additionally, theoretical positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) of TMB were estimated. The impact of filtering pathogenic and germline variants on TMB estimates was assessed. Calibration curves specific to each panel assay were developed to facilitate translation of panel TMB values to whole exome sequencing (WES) TMB values.

RESULTS

Panel sizes >667 Kb are necessary to maintain adequate PPA and NPA for calling TMB high versus TMB low across the range of cut-offs used in practice. Failure to filter out pathogenic variants when estimating panel TMB resulted in overestimating TMB relative to WES for all assays. Filtering out potential germline variants at >0% population minor allele frequency resulted in the strongest correlation to WES TMB. Application of a calibration approach derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas data, tailored to each panel assay, reduced the spread of panel TMB values around the WES TMB as reflected in lower root mean squared error (RMSE) for 26/29 (90%) of the clinical samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Estimation of TMB varies across different panels, with panel size, gene content, and bioinformatics pipelines contributing to empirical variability. Statistical calibration can achieve more consistent results across panels and allows for comparison of TMB values across various panel assays. To promote reproducibility and comparability across assays, a software tool was developed and made publicly available.

Establishing guidelines to harmonize tumor mutational burden (TMB): in silico assessment of variation in TMB quantification across diagnostic platforms: phase I of the Friends of Cancer Research TMB Harmonization Project

Background

Tumor mutational burden (TMB), defined as the number of somatic mutations per megabase of interrogated genomic sequence, demonstrates predictive biomarker potential for the identification of patients with cancer most likely to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors. TMB is optimally calculated by whole exome sequencing (WES), but next-generation sequencing targeted panels provide TMB estimates in a time-effective and cost-effective manner. However, differences in panel size and gene coverage, in addition to the underlying bioinformatics pipelines, are known drivers of variability in TMB estimates across laboratories. By directly comparing panel-based TMB estimates from participating laboratories, this study aims to characterize the theoretical variability of panel-based TMB estimates, and provides guidelines on TMB reporting, analytic validation requirements and reference standard alignment in order to maintain consistency of TMB estimation across platforms.

Methods

Eleven laboratories used WES data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Multi-Center Mutation calling in Multiple Cancers (MC3) samples and calculated TMB from the subset of the exome restricted to the genes covered by their targeted panel using their own bioinformatics pipeline (panel TMB). A reference TMB value was calculated from the entire exome using a uniform bioinformatics pipeline all members agreed on (WES TMB). Linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between WES and panel TMB for all 32 cancer types combined and separately. Variability in panel TMB values at various WES TMB values was also quantified using 95% prediction limits.

Results

Study results demonstrated that variability within and between panel TMB values increases as the WES TMB values increase. For each panel, prediction limits based on linear regression analyses that modeled panel TMB as a function of WES TMB were calculated and found to approximately capture the intended 95% of observed panel TMB values. Certain cancer types, such as uterine, bladder and colon cancers exhibited greater variability in panel TMB values, compared with lung and head and neck cancers.

Conclusions

Increasing uptake of TMB as a predictive biomarker in the clinic creates an urgent need to bring stakeholders together to agree on the harmonization of key aspects of panel-based TMB estimation, such as the standardization of TMB reporting, standardization of analytical validation studies and the alignment of panel-based TMB values with a reference standard. These harmonization efforts should improve consistency and reliability of panel TMB estimates and aid in clinical decision-making.

Assigning evidence to actionability: An introduction to variant interpretation in precision cancer medicine

Modern concepts in precision cancer medicine are based on increasingly complex genomic analyses and require standardized criteria for the functional evaluation and reporting of detected genomic alterations in order to assess their clinical relevance. In this article, we propose and address the necessary steps in systematic variant evaluation consisting of bioinformatic analysis, functional annotation and clinical interpretation, focusing on the latter two aspects. We discuss the role and clinical application of current variant classification systems and point out their scope and limitations. Finally, we highlight the significance of the molecular tumor board as a platform for clinical decision-making based on genomic analyses.

Radiomic assessment as a method for predicting tumor mutation burden (TMB) of bladder cancer patients: a feasibility study

Background

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is an emerging prognostic biomarker of immunotherapy for bladder cancer (BLCA). We aim at investigating radiomic features’ value in predicting the TMB status of BLCA patients.

Methods

Totally, 75 patients with BLCA were enrolled. Radiomic features extracted from the volume of interest of preoperative pelvic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) were obtained for each case. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis was performed based on radiomic features. Sequential univariate Logistic regression, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and the backward stepwise regression were used to develop a TMB-predicting model using radiomic features.

Results

The unsupervised clustering analysis divided the total cohort into two groups, i.e., group A (32.0%) and B (68.0%). Patients in group A had a significantly larger proportion of having high TMB against those in group B (66.7% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.039), indicating the intrinsic ability of radiomic features in TMB-predicting. In univariate analysis, 27 radiomic features could predict TMB. Based on six radiomic features selected by logistic and LASSO regression, a TMB-predicting model was built and visualized by nomogram. The area under the ROC curve of the model reached 0.853. Besides, the calibration curve and the decision curve also revealed the good performance of the model.

Conclusions

Our work firstly proved the feasibility of using radiomics to predict TMB for patients with BLCA. The predictive model based on radiomic features from pelvic CECT has a promising ability to predict TMB. Future study with a larger cohort is needed to verify our findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08569-y.

Multi-Gene Testing Overview with a Clinical Perspective in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the technology of choice for the routine screening of tumor samples in clinical practice. In this setting, the targeted sequencing of a restricted number of clinically relevant genes represents the most practical option when looking for genetic variants associated with cancer, as well as for the choice of targeted treatments. In this review, we analyze available NGS platforms and clinical applications of multi-gene testing in breast cancer, with a focus on metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We make an overview of the clinical utility of multi-gene testing in mTNBC, and then, as immunotherapy is emerging as a possible targeted therapy for mTNBC, we also briefly report on the results of the latest clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and TNBC, where NGS could play a role for the potential predictive utility of homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) and tumor mutational burden (TMB).

[Next generation sequencing in histopathology : Applications and methodological challenges]

The enormous increase in sequencing capacity due to the development of next generation sequencing technologies opens up new opportunities in the fields of histopathology, research, and diagnostics, but also poses huge challenges.The identification of genomic aberrations (point mutations, small insertions and deletions, fusion transcripts, and tumor mutation burden (TMB)) have already become a reliable part of routine molecular diagnostics. This will be supplemented by additional applications, namely gene amplifications, microsatellite instability, genomic signatures like homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), mRNA expression patterns, B‑ and T‑cell clonality, and DNA methylation. Challenges in preanalytics and the evaluation of assay sensitivity and specificity as well as proper curation of identified aberrations, which requires a new type of specialist, are presented and discussed.

FDA-Approved and Emerging Next Generation Predictive Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients

A patient's response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a complex quantitative trait, and determined by multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Three currently FDA-approved predictive biomarkers (progra1mmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1); microsatellite instability (MSI); tumor mutational burden (TMB)) are routinely used for patient selection for ICI response in clinical practice. Although clinical utility of these biomarkers has been demonstrated in ample clinical trials, many variables involved in using these biomarkers have poised serious challenges in daily practice. Furthermore, the predicted responders by these three biomarkers only have a small percentage of overlap, suggesting that each biomarker captures different contributing factors to ICI response. Optimized use of currently FDA-approved biomarkers and development of a new generation of predictive biomarkers are urgently needed. In this review, we will first discuss three widely used FDA-approved predictive biomarkers and their optimal use. Secondly, we will review four novel gene signature biomarkers: T-cell inflamed gene expression profile (GEP), T-cell dysfunction and exclusion gene signature (TIDE), melanocytic plasticity signature (MPS) and B-cell focused gene signature. The GEP and TIDE have shown better predictive performance than PD-L1, and PD-L1 or TMB, respectively. The MPS is superior to PD-L1, TMB, and TIDE. The B-cell focused gene signature represents a previously unexplored predictive biomarker to ICI response. Thirdly, we will highlight two combined predictive biomarkers: TMB+GEP and MPS+TIDE. These integrated biomarkers showed improved predictive outcomes compared to a single predictor. Finally, we will present a potential nucleic acid biomarker signature, allowing DNA and RNA biomarkers to be analyzed in one assay. This comprehensive signature could represent a future direction of developing robust predictive biomarkers, particularly for the cold tumors, for ICI response.

Tumor mutational burden assessment in non-small-cell lung cancer samples: results from the TMB2 harmonization project comparing three NGS panels

Background

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a recently proposed predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Available assays for TMB determination differ in horizontal coverage, gene content and algorithms, leading to discrepancies in results, impacting patient selection. A harmonization study of TMB assessment with available assays in a cohort of patients with NSCLC is urgently needed.

Methods

We evaluated the TMB assessment obtained with two marketed next generation sequencing panels: TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500) and Oncomine Tumor Mutation Load (OTML) versus a reference assay (Foundation One, FO) in 96 NSCLC samples. Additionally, we studied the level of agreement among the three methods with respect to PD-L1 expression in tumors, checked the level of different immune infiltrates versus TMB, and performed an inter-laboratory reproducibility study. Finally, adjusted cut-off values were determined.

Results

Both panels showed strong agreement with FO, with concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) of 0.933 (95% CI 0.908 to 0.959) for TSO500 and 0.881 (95% CI 0.840 to 0.922) for OTML. The corresponding CCCs were 0.951 (TSO500-FO) and 0.919 (OTML-FO) in tumors with <1% of cells expressing PD-L1 (PD-L1<1%; N=55), and 0.861 (TSO500-FO) and 0.722 (OTML-FO) in tumors with PD-L1≥1% (N=41). Inter-laboratory reproducibility analyses showed higher reproducibility with TSO500. No significant differences were found in terms of immune infiltration versus TMB. Adjusted cut-off values corresponding to 10 muts/Mb with FO needed to be lowered to 7.847 muts/Mb (TSO500) and 8.380 muts/Mb (OTML) to ensure a sensitivity >88%. With these cut-offs, the positive predictive value was 78.57% (95% CI 67.82 to 89.32) and the negative predictive value was 87.50% (95% CI 77.25 to 97.75) for TSO500, while for OTML they were 73.33% (95% CI 62.14 to 84.52) and 86.11% (95% CI 74.81 to 97.41), respectively.

Conclusions

Both panels exhibited robust analytical performances for TMB assessment, with stronger concordances in patients with negative PD-L1 expression. TSO500 showed a higher inter-laboratory reproducibility. The cut-offs for each assay were lowered to optimal overlap with FO.

[Predictive diagnostics for checkpoint inhibitors]

Checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized oncological treatment in many cancers and added a new immuno-oncological treatment pillar to the medicinal arsenal of conventional and molecularly targeted therapies. In monotherapy and in combination therapies, however, not all patients respond equally well, even in generally responsive tumor entities. Therefore, since the introduction of these therapies, a major focus has been the research on and implementation of predictive markers for patient selection. The first established biomarker, the expression of the target molecule PD-L1, has found its way into routine diagnostics in a large number of unfortunately very divergent diagnostic constellations in multiple entities. In addition, some molecular predictors, including the measurement of microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden, have also been suggested and in some cases are already implemented into routine diagnostics. Additional molecular parameters have been proposed but most of them have not yet found their way into routine patient care. This review article discusses the current status and recent developments in the field of diagnostic response predictors in the context of an immune checkpoint blockade.

Validation of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Tumor Mutation Burden Analysis: Results from the Onconetwork Immuno-Oncology Consortium

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is evaluated as a biomarker of response to immunotherapy. We present the efforts of the Onconetwork Immuno-Oncology Consortium to validate a commercial targeted sequencing test for TMB calculation. A three-phase study was designed to validate the Oncomine Tumor Mutational Load (OTML) assay at nine European laboratories. Phase 1 evaluated reproducibility and accuracy on seven control samples. In phase 2, six formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples tested with FoundationOne were reanalyzed with the OTML panel to evaluate concordance and reproducibility. Phase 3 involved analysis of 90 colorectal cancer samples with known microsatellite instability (MSI) status to evaluate TMB and MSI association. High reproducibility of TMB was demonstrated among the sites in the first and second phases. Strong correlation was also detected between mean and expected TMB in phase 1 (r² = 0.998) and phase 2 (r² = 0.96). Detection of actionable mutations was also confirmed. In colorectal cancer samples, the expected pattern of MSI-high/high-TMB and microsatellite stability/low-TMB was present, and gene signatures produced by the panel suggested the presence of a POLE mutation in two samples. The OTML panel demonstrated robustness and reproducibility for TMB evaluation. Results also suggest the possibility of using the panel for mutational signatures and variant detection. Collaborative efforts between academia and companies are crucial to accelerate the translation of new biomarkers into clinical research.

Influence of low tumor content on tumor mutational burden estimation by whole-exome sequencing and targeted panel sequencing

BACKGROUND

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a promising biomarker for stratifying patient subpopulation who would benefit from immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies. Although great efforts have been made for standardizing TMB measurement, mutation calling and TMB quantification can be challenging in samples with low tumor content including liquid biopsies. The effect of varying tumor content on TMB estimation by different assay methods has never been systematically investigated.

METHOD

We established a series of reference standard DNA samples derived from 11 pairs of tumor-normal matched human cell lines across different cancer types. Each tumor cell line was mixed with its matched normal at 0% (control), 1%, 2%, 5%, and 10% mass-to-mass ratio to mimic the clinical samples with low tumor content. TMB of these reference standards was evaluated by both ∼1000× whole-exome sequencing (wesTMB) and targeted panel sequencing (psTMB) at four different vendors. Both regression and classification analyses of TMB were performed for theoretical investigation and clinical practice purposes.

RESULTS

Linear regression model was established that demonstrated in silico psTMB determined by regions of interest (ROI) as a great representative of wesTMB based on TCGA dataset. It was also true in our reference standard samples as the predicted psTMB interval based on the observed wesTMB captured the intended 90% of the in silico psTMB values. Although ∼1000× deep WES was applied, reference standard samples with less than 5% of tumor proportions are below the assay limit of detection (LoD) of wesTMB quantification. However, predicted wesTMB based on observed psTMB accurately classify (>0.97 AUC) for TMB high and low patient stratification even in samples with 2% of tumor content, which is more clinically relevant, as TMB determination should be a qualitative assay for TMB high and low patient classification. One targeted panel sequencing vendor using an optimized blood psTMB pipeline can further classify TMB status accurately (>0.82 AUC) in samples with only 1% of tumor content.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a linear model to establish the quantitative correlation between wesTMB and psTMB. A set of DNA reference standards was produced in aid to standardize TMB measurements in samples with low tumor content across different targeted sequencing panels. This study is a significant contribution aiming to harmonize TMB estimation and extend its future application in clinical samples with low tumor content including liquid biopsy.

Blood tumor mutation burden can predict the clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Tissue tumor mutation burden (tTMB) assessed by whole-exome sequencing (WES), which has been regarded as the gold standard method of tTMB measurement, can predict the clinical benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Multiple studies have investigated the feasibility of utilizing large panels to evaluate TMB but have obtained conflicting results. Furthermore, whether blood TMB (bTMB) can also be a predictive biomarker in NSCLC has not been determined.

METHODS

Fifty-six advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs were enrolled, including an exploratory cohort (n = 42) and a small independent validation cohort (n = 14). Next-generation sequencing was performed on tumor and plasma samples collected prior to ICI treatment using a panel consisting of 520 cancer-related genes (OncoScreen) to evaluate tTMB/bTMB. WES was also performed on tumor samples to serve as references.

RESULTS

A positive correlation between tTMB derived from WES and OncoScreen was observed. OncoScreen-derived tTMB showed a positive correlation with OncoScreen-derived bTMB. Patients with OncoScreen-derived tTMB [Formula: see text] 7 mutations/Mb (p = 0.003) or bTMB [Formula: see text] 11 mutations/Mb (p = 0.0029) had superior progression-free survival (PFS). In the small validation cohort, patients with OncoScreen-derived bTMB [Formula: see text] 11 mutations/Mb exhibited longer PFS (p = 0.192) with a nonsignificant difference. In all 42 patients who had available bTMB and PFS, patients with bTMB [Formula: see text] 11 mutations/Mb had significantly longer PFS (p = 0.011) than those with bTMB [Formula: see text] 11 mutations/Mb.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed the feasibility of using large panels to estimate TMB. We also demonstrated that bTMB can serve as a potential biomarker for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in NSCLC.

Next-Generation Sequencing with Liquid Biopsies from Treatment-Naïve Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients

Recently, the liquid biopsy (LB), a non-invasive and easy to repeat approach, has started to compete with the tissue biopsy (TB) for detection of targets for administration of therapeutic strategies for patients with advanced stages of lung cancer at tumor progression. A LB at diagnosis of late stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is also being performed. It may be asked if a LB can be complementary (according to the clinical presentation or systematics) or even an alternative to a TB for treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients. Nucleic acid analysis with a TB by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is gradually replacing targeted sequencing methods for assessment of genomic alterations in lung cancer patients with tumor progression, but also at baseline. However, LB is still not often used in daily practice for NGS. This review addresses different aspects relating to the use of LB for NGS at diagnosis in advanced NSCLC, including its advantages and limitations.

Tumor mutation burden testing: a survey of the International Quality Network for Pathology (IQN Path)

While tumour mutation burden (TMB) is emerging as a possible biomarker for immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), methods for testing have not been standardised as yet. In April 2019, the International Quality Network for Pathology (IQN Path) launched a survey to assess the current practice of TMB testing. Of the 127 laboratories that replied, 69 (54.3%) had already introduced TMB analysis for research purposes and/or clinical applications. Fifty laboratories (72.5%) used targeted sequencing, although a number of different panels were employed. Most laboratories tested formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material (94.2%), while 18/69 (26%) tested also cell-free DNA. Fifty-five laboratories used both single nucleotide variants and indels for TMB calculation; 20 centers included only non-synonymous variants. In conclusion, the data from this survey indicate that multiple global laboratories were capable of rapidly introducing routine clinical TMB testing. However, the variability of testing methods raises concerns about the reproducibility of results among centers.

Comprehensive tumor molecular profile analysis in clinical practice

Background

Tumor molecular profile analysis by Next Generation Sequencing technology is currently widely applied in clinical practice and has enabled the detection of predictive biomarkers of response to targeted treatment. In parallel with targeted therapies, immunotherapies are also evolving, revolutionizing cancer therapy, with Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), Microsatellite instability (MSI), and Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) analysis being the biomarkers employed most commonly.

Methods

In the present study, tumor molecular profile analysis was performed using a 161 gene NGS panel, containing the majority of clinically significant genes for cancer treatment selection. A variety of tumor types have been analyzed, including aggressive and hard to treat cancers such as pancreatic cancer. Besides, the clinical utility of immunotherapy biomarkers (TMB, MSI, PD-L1), was also studied.

Results

Molecular profile analysis was conducted in 610 cancer patients, while in 393 of them a at least one biomarker for immunotherapy response was requested. An actionable alteration was detected in 77.87% of the patients. 54.75% of them received information related to on-label or off-label treatment (Tiers 1A.1, 1A.2, 2B, and 2C.1) and 21.31% received a variant that could be used for clinical trial inclusion. The addition to immunotherapy biomarker to targeted biomarkers’ analysis in 191 cases increased the number of patients with an on-label treatment recommendation by 22.92%, while an option for on-label or off-label treatment was provided in 71.35% of the cases.

Conclusions

Tumor molecular profile analysis using NGS is a first-tier method for a variety of tumor types and provides important information for decision making in the treatment of cancer patients. Importantly, simultaneous analysis for targeted therapy and immunotherapy biomarkers could lead to better tumor characterization and offer actionable information in the majority of patients. Furthermore, our data suggest that one in two patients may be eligible for on-label ICI treatment based on biomarker analysis. However, appropriate interpretation of results from such analysis is essential for implementation in clinical practice and accurate refinement of treatment strategy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12920-021-00952-9.