Biomarker Testing for People With Advanced Lung Cancer in England

Multicenter evaluation of an automated, multiplex, RNA-based molecular assay for detection of ALK, ROS1, RET fusions and MET exon 14 skipping in NSCLC

The current study assessed the performance of the fully automated RT-PCR-based Idylla™ GeneFusion Assay, which simultaneously covers the advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (aNSCLC) actionable ALK, ROS1, RET, and MET exon 14 rearrangements, in a routine clinical setting involving 12 European clinical centers. The Idylla™ GeneFusion Assay detects fusions using fusion-specific as well as expression imbalance detection, the latter enabling detection of uncommon fusions not covered by fusion-specific assays. In total, 326 archival aNSCLC formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples were included of which 44% were resected specimen, 46% tissue biopsies, and 9% cytological specimen. With a total of 179 biomarker-positive cases (i.e., 85 ALK, 33 ROS1, 20 RET fusions and 41 MET exon 14 skipping), this is one of the largest fusion-positive datasets ever tested. The results of the Idylla™ GeneFusion Assay were compared with earlier results of routine reference technologies including fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing, establishing a high sensitivity/specificity of 96.1%/99.6% for ALK, 96.7%/99.0% for ROS1, 100%/99.3% for RET fusion, and 92.5%/99.6% for MET exon 14 skipping, and a low failure rate (0.9%). The Idylla™ GeneFusion Assay was found to be a reliable, sensitive, and specific tool for routine detection of ALK, ROS1, RET fusions and MET exon 14 skipping. Given its short turnaround time of about 3 h, it is a time-efficient upfront screening tool in FFPE samples, supporting rapid clinical decision making. Moreover, expression-imbalance-based detection of potentially novel fusions may be easily verified with other routine technologies without delaying treatment initiation.

Development and Update of Guideline-based Quality Indicators in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

In 2022, an update of the German lung cancer guideline, first published in 2010 and revised in 2018, was released. This article aims to show the process of updating, developing, and implementing guideline-based quality indicators (QI) into the certification system for lung cancer centers (LCC).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary and interprofessional working group revised the guideline QIs from 2018 using the strong recommendations of the guideline update, a systematic review for QIs, and the results of the implemented QIs from LCC.

RESULTS

For 4 out of 8 indicators from the 2018 guideline, the LCC showed an improved implementation of the requirements in the last 3 years (2018-2020). For 3 indicators, the median of the results was constant at a very high level (≥96% or 100%). Only the "adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy" indicator showed declining values between 2018 and 2020. The target values and plausibility limits were well achieved by LCC. After updating the guideline, one QI from 2018 was not included in the new QI set due to the small denominator population. Based on the new strong recommendations, 8 new QIs were defined. From the QI set of the guideline update, 13 of 15 indicators (7 since 2018 and 6 from 2022 on) were adopted into the certification program.

CONCLUSIONS

The guideline recommendations are implemented by LCC at a high level. The process presented confirms the successful implementation of the so-called quality cycle in oncology. The QIs developed by the German Guideline Program in Oncology (GGPO) are adopted by the certification program. The implementation of the QI is measured in LCC, evaluated by the German Cancer Society (DKG), and reflected back to the GGPO. The "real world" data have led to the deletion of one QI and show a high implementation of most QIs in LCC.

Evaluation of the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue of human lung cancer

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation detection is essential for the therapy of lung cancer. A sensitive, specific, and cost-effective standardized method to quickly and accurately detect EGFR mutations is urgently needed.

Methods

We evaluated the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Assay for EGFR mutations in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples from 232 lung cancer patients, and compared the results with amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) (n=146) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) (n=86). The surgical tumor sections and cell blocks derived from the same FFPE section were compared. Overall concordance, specificity, sensitivity, cost-effectiveness and turnaround time were compared among the three methods.

Results

The overall concordance between Idylla and ARMS was 89.51% [95% confidence interval (CI): 83.31% to 93.64%] and the specificity of Idylla was 88.68% (95% CI: 80.69% to 93.76%). A concordance of 97.67% (95% CI: 91.41% to 99.86%) was obtained between Idylla and NGS, the specificity of Idylla was 96.30% (95% CI: 86.16% to 99.36%). Compared to the ARMS and NGS, the Idylla™ system significantly reduces the turnaround time. Combining labor, equipment, reagents and time costs, Idylla is more affordable.

Conclusions

Clinically urgent cases with adequate cellularity, can first perform Idylla to detect critical markers, then perform NGS for a comprehensive mutation analysis. Besides, with limited molecular expertise or infrastructure, the Idylla has the potential to extend EGFR testing to more pathology laboratories in primary hospitals.

A narrative review of methods for the identification of ALK fusions in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma

Background and Objective

This narrative review is intended to provide pragmatic knowledge of current methods for the search of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). This information is very timely, because a recent survey has identified that almost 50% of patients with advanced NSCLC were not candidates for targeted therapies because of biomarker testing issues.

Methods

PubMed was searched from January 1st, 2012 to February 28th, 2023 using the following keywords: "ALK" and "lung", including reviews and our own work.

Key Content and Findings

Testing rates have not reached 85% among patients' candidates to ALK inhibition. The advantages and disadvantages of the different analytical options [immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), real-time polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing (NGS)] are discussed. The key factor for success in ALK testing is a deep understanding of the concept of "molecular redundancy". This notion has been recommended and endorsed by all the major professional organizations in the field and can be summarized as follows: "laboratories should ensure that test results that are unexpected, discordant, equivocal, or otherwise of low confidence are confirmed or resolved using an alternative method or sample". In-depth knowledge of the different ALK testing methodologies can help clinical and molecular tumor boards implement and maintain sensible algorithms for a rapid and effective detection of predictive biomarkers in patients with NSCLC.

Conclusions

Multimodality testing has the potential to increase both the testing rate and the accuracy of ALK fusion identification.

Patient Characteristics, Testing and Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes in EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multinational, Real-World Study

INTRODUCTION

Treatment landscape for advanced/metastatic NSCLC (aNSCLC) has evolved considerably over the past few decades with the advent of targeted therapies for epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm+) aNSCLC treatment. This study described real-world patient and disease characteristics, treatment and practice patterns, and clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with EGFRm+ aNSCLC.

METHODS

Data were derived from the Adelphi NSCLC Disease Specific Programme™ (DSP™), a point-in-time survey conducted between July and December 2020. The survey included oncologists and pulmonologists, and their consulting patients (with physician-confirmed EGFRm+ aNSCLC) from nine countries: the US, Brazil, the UK, Italy, France, Spain, Germany, Japan, and Taiwan. All analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS

Overall, 542 physicians reported data for 2857 patients (mean age 65.6 years), and most patients were female (56.0%), white (61.0%), and had stage IV disease at initial diagnosis (76.0%), and adenocarcinoma histology (89.0%). Most patients received EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) therapy in first- (91.0%), second- (74.0%), and third-line (67.0%). The most common tumor samples and methods for EGFR detection were EGFR-specific mutation detection tests (44.0%) and core needle biopsy (56.0%). Median time to next treatment was 14.0 (IQR 8.0-22.0) months and disease progression was the main physician-reported reason for early discontinuation. The most common physician-reported disease symptoms were cough (51.0%), fatigue (37.0%), and dyspnea (33.0%). In patients assessed for PROs, mean EQ-5D-5L index and FACT-L health utility scores were 0.71 and 83.5, respectively. On average, patients lost 10.6 h of work/week for approximately 29.2 weeks due to EGFRm+ aNSCLC.

CONCLUSION

This real-world multinational data set showed that most patients with EGFRm+ aNSCLC were treated per the country relevant clinical guidelines, with progression as the main reason for early treatment discontinuation. For the included countries, these findings may offer a useful benchmark for decision makers to determine future allocation of healthcare resources for patients with EGFRm+ aNSCLC.

Precision medicine in Thoracic Oncology: understanding disparities to tackle inequities in access

INTRODUCTION

Precision medicine is defined as personalized interventions fitted to patients' or tumors' characteristics. Patients diagnosed with different neoplasms have benefited from a personalized therapeutic approach in terms of response and survival. However, several challenges must be addressed for precision oncology to become a global reality. Access to genomic testing that allows biomarker identification is a main issue.

AREAS COVERED

A nonsystematic literature review about inequities in access to molecular genetic testing, focusing on lung cancer as the prominent example, was performed by a group of expert clinical oncologists.

EXPERT OPINION

Access to molecular tests and their matched treatments differ between regions of the world and even among diverse populations in the same country. Socioeconomic characteristics are often strongly correlated with this disparity. Furthermore, although the cost is a determinant factor for inequality, other issues have been recognized. Advances in the education of healthcare professionals, patient advocacy initiatives, building local laboratory workstreams, and promoting favorable regulatory environment are vital factors in promoting equal access.

Usage of epidermal growth factor mutation testing and impact on treatment patterns in non-small cell lung cancer: An international observational study

OBJECTIVES

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (EGFRm) are common oncogene drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This real-world study explored treatment patterns and time to receive EGFRm test results in patients with advanced EGFRm NSCLC.

METHODS

A cross-sectional medical chart review was completed May-August 2020 in Australia, Canada, Germany, Italy, South Korea, Taiwan, UK, and USA. Eligible patients had advanced NSCLC and a positive EGFRm test result January-December 2017. Data were abstracted from NSCLC diagnosis to end of follow-up (31 March 2020) or patient's death whichever occurred earlier. The index date was the date of EGFRm confirmation.

RESULTS

223 physicians provided data for 1,793 patients. Patients' mean age was 64.7 years, 54 % were male, 30.7 % had no history of smoking. Overall, 78 % of EGFRm test results were received ≤ 2 weeks after request (range of median 7-14 days across countries). Median time from advanced NSCLC diagnosis to EGFRm test result was 18 days (median range 10-22 days across countries). Over a third (37 %) of patients received a systemic treatment prior to EGFRm result; chemotherapy (25 %) and EGFR-TKI (15 %) were most commonly prescribed; post-EGFR test-result was EGFR-TKI (68 %); 80 % of patients initiated EGFR-TKI at any time point post-NSCLC diagnosis. Of those receiving a first-line EGFR-TKI post-EGFRm testing, 84 % received a TKI alone, 12 % in combination with chemotherapy, and 3 % with other treatments. Median time from first-line EGFR-TKI initiation post-EGFRm testing to first subsequent treatment was 19.8 months.

CONCLUSION

Over one-fifth of patients wait >14 days for their EGFRm test results, affecting their likelihood of receiving first-line EGFR-TKI with 20 % of patients never receiving EGFR TKI treatment. There was significant inter-country variability in the proportion of patients receiving EGFR TKIs. Our study highlights the need to improve EGFRm testing turnaround times and treatment initiation across countries.

Effect of EGFR-TKI targeted therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of EGFR-TKI targeted therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Eighty-four cases of NSCLC were retrospectively assigned into an observation group (OG, n=42) and a control group (CG, n=42) according to the treatment methods. The CG received conventional chemotherapy, and the OG received icotinib hydrochloride EGFR-TKI targeted therapy. The clinical efficacy, cellular immunity, humoral immunity, quality of life, adverse reactions and survival time were compared between the two groups. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the factors influencing the prognosis of advanced NSCLC.

RESULTS

The total response rate was substantially higher, and the incidence of adverse reactions was considerably lower in the OG than those in the CG (all P<0.05). The post-treatment SF-36 score was increased in both groups with significantly higher score in the OG than the CG (all P<0.001). The post-treatment CD4⁺ counts in both groups were notably lower than those of pre-treatment, and the count was lower in the CG than that in the OG (all P<0.001). The post-treatment CD8⁺ counts in both groups were notably higher after treatment than those of pre-treatment and was higher in the CG than that in the OG (all P<0.001). The post-treatment levels of IgM and IgA in both groups were declined compared with those of pre-treatment (P<0.001) with significantly lower levels in the OG than the CG (P<0.01). The 18-month mortality of the OG was significantly lower than that of the CG (P<0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that lesion diameter and differentiation degree of tumor cells were independent factors influencing the prognosis (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

EGFR-TKI targeted therapy can relieve clinical symptoms, and improve immune function and quality of life of patients with advanced NSCLC, which is worthy of clinical application.

Molecular Profiling in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Towards a Switch to Next-Generation Sequencing Reflex Testing

Molecular diagnosis of lung cancer is a constantly evolving field thanks to major advances in precision oncology. The wide range of actionable molecular alterations in non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NS-NSCLC) and the multiplicity of mechanisms of resistance to treatment resulted in the need for repeated testing to establish an accurate molecular diagnosis, as well as to track disease evolution over time. While assessing the increasing complexity of the molecular composition of tumors at baseline, as well as over time, has become increasingly challenging, the emergence and implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing has extensively facilitated molecular profiling in NS-NSCLC. In this review, we discuss recent developments in the molecular profiling of NS-NSCLC and how NGS addresses current needs, as well as how it can be implemented to address future challenges in the management of NS-NSCLC.