A Real-World Evaluation of Atezolizumab Plus Platinum-Etoposide Chemotherapy in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC in Canada

Brazilian real-world data of immunotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer

Introduction

The landmarks of Thoracic Oncology in the last two decades have been accompanied by exponential growth in costs, making it imperative to assess the real benefit of incorporating new technologies. Combining immunotherapy (IO) with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy has become the standard of care in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the absolute difference in overall survival (OS) has reached three months. This study aimed to investigate the impact of this intervention in a real-world cohort.

Material and methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from ES-SCLC patients (pts) from a Brazilian Oncology Group, diagnosed and treated between January 2018 and June 2022. The primary objectives were median OS (mOS) and median time to subsequent treatment (mTST) according to IO exposure in the first-line setting. Secondarily, we intend to compare these results with the literature data and with an internal and contemporary cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy alone.

Results

In total, 85 SCLC patients were included in this analysis. The median follow-up was nine months. First line regimens were atezolizumab + platinum-etoposide in 53%, platinum-etoposide in 36% and platinum-irinotecan in 11%. Among ES-SCLC pts who received IO in their first-line treatment, the mOS was 15.0 months (95% CI: 11.20; 18.80) and the mTST was 8.0 months (95% CI: 6.25; 9.75). As a reference, our internal and contemporary control presented numerically lower mOS and mTST: 9.0 months (95% CI: 2.08; 19.92) and 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.88; 8.12), respectively.

Discussion

Few real-world cohorts are evaluating the impact of IO in ES-SCLC, limited to high-income countries. Our data suggest that IO has a meaningful impact on the outcome of ES-SCLC in daily clinical practice, confirming previous trial results.

Exploring YAP1-related TIME in SCLC: implications for survival and treatment response to immuno-chemotherapy

Aim: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is usually diagnosed as an advanced stage with a poor outcome. SCLC has limited response to immunotherapy due to the absence or lack of immune cell infiltration, so studying its tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is essential. Methods: The study involved patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) diagnosed at the Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute between January 2018 and April 2022 who had received the atezolizumab/carboplatin/etoposide (ECT) treatment. We used multi-immunohistochemistry (mIHC) to assess the prognostic value of YAP1 and TIME in SCLC, with results confirmed using public data. Results: 15 patients with sufficient baseline biopsy samples were included in this study. The total population of YAP1-positive cells is inversely related to progression-free survival (PFS) and shows a potential negative correlation with overall survival (OS). CD56-positive cells are the primary components of TIME in SCLC tumor parenchyma and stroma. The total population and cell density of YAP1-positive cells are significantly positively correlated with CD4-positive cells. Furthermore, in the tumor parenchyma, both the proportion and the cell density of YAP1-positive cells are positively correlated with that of FOXP3-positive cells. The total population of CD56-positive cells showed a negative correlation trend with YAP1-positive cells but without significant difference. Conclusion: YAP1 has shown prognostic value in SCLC patients receiving ECT regimen treatment. The high expression level of YAP1 seems related to the inhibitory TIME. However, some prospective studies with larger populations are warranted.

Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs and RWSs

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWS).

METHODS

By scanning PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and other relevant clinical information public databases, nine RCTs and eight RWSs involving 5205 patients were included in the study. We directly compared the differences between chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy, and determined the optimal treatment strategy through network meta-analysis (NMA).

RESULTS

Compared to chemotherapy, the addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improves the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) in SCLC patients. Regarding safety, both RCTs and RWSs indicated no significant difference in grade 3-4 adverse events between chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy. NMA showed serplulimab plus chemotherapy (Serp_Chemo) appears to provide the best OS, PFS, and ORR benefit, while nivolumab plus chemotherapy shows higher toxicity than other regimens. In subgroup analysis, for elderly patients (age ≥65) and non-elderly (age <65) patients, the most promising quality regimens for achieving better OS extension are atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (Atez_Chemo) and Serp_Chemo, respectively. For patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > upper limit of normal (ULN), there is no apparent OS benefit from immune therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In ES-SCLC treatment, adding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to standard chemotherapy improves OS, PFS, and ORR, with Serp_Chemo shows the most promise. Atez_Chemo and Serp_Chemo provided better survival for elderly and non-elderly patients, respectively.

Impact of thoracic radiotherapy on first-line treatment outcomes in ES-SCLC patients

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic advantage of thoracic radiotherapy (tRT) as an adjunct to first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remains unclear. We sought to elucidate this in a retrospective cohort study comparing the effectiveness and safety of tRT in combination with first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

METHODS

Our retrospective study included patients with ES-SCLC, treated at the West China Hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. They received first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy and were categorized into two cohorts based on the administration of tRT. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression analysis was utilized to identify potential independent predictors of prognosis and to compare the treatment outcomes across various patient subgroups. Treatment-related toxicities across both cohorts were compared using the Chi-squared test.

RESULTS

A total of 99patients were eligible for the study, out of which 55 received tRT. The medianduration of follow-up was 39 months. Remarkably, patients who received tRTdemonstrated superior OS and PFS in comparison to those who did not (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis further confirmed these findings. Multivariate analysisidentified treatment group and liver metastasis as independent prognosticfactors (P < 0.05). The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events showed nostatistically significant difference between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, weconfirmed that the addition of tRT to the conventional regimen of first-linechemotherapy and immunotherapy yields better survival outcomes without asignificant increase in toxicity.

Real-world evaluation of first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with atezolizumab plus platinum/etoposide: a focus on patients with brain metastasis

PURPOSE

A previous real-world study conducted in China confirmed that first-line atezolizumab, in combination with etoposide/platinum (EP), leads to significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared to EP alone in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The present study aimed to provide updated survival outcome data and evaluate the clinical efficacy of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in ES-SCLC patients with brain metastasis (BM).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 225 patients with ES-SCLC who were treated with EP alone (EP group) or a combination of EP + atezolizumab (atezolizumab group). Survival outcomes for the total study sample and patients in the BM subgroup were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The atezolizumab group continued to demonstrate significantly longer PFS than the EP group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68). The median overall survival (OS) was 26.2 months in the atezolizumab group vs. 14.8 months in the EP group (HR, 0.63). Additionally, among the BM patients in our study, the median PFS was found to be longer in the atezolizumab group (7.0 months) than in the EP group (4.1 months) (HR, 0.46). The OS of the BM patients did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of atezolizumab to EP as a first-line treatment for ES-SCLC was found to improve survival outcomes. This treatment combination may also prolong PFS in patients with BM, regardless of the administration of cranial irradiation. However, among the BM patients in our study, there was no significant difference in OS between the two treatment groups.

The Real-World Outcome of First Line Atezolizumab in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy has improved survival outcomes in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, their real-world effectiveness remains unknown. Therefore, we investigated the effectiveness of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in ES-SCLC in actual clinical settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicenter prospective cohort study, patients with ES-SCLC receiving or scheduled to receive atezolizumab in combination with etoposide and carboplatin were enrolled between June 2021 and August 2022. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients with ES-SCLC were enrolled from seven centers. Median age was 69 years, and 6% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 2. The median PFS was 6.0 months, the 1-year OS rate was 62.2%, and the median OS was 13.5 months. An ECOG PS of 2-3 and progressive disease as the best response were poor prognostic factors for PFS, while an ECOG PS of 2-3 and brain metastasis were associated with poor prognosis for OS. In addition, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy was found to be an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 0.336; p=0.021). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 7% of patients, with treatment-related deaths occurring in 2% of patients.

CONCLUSION

We provided evidence of the favorable real-world effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in ES-SCLC patients, including in the elderly and those with poor ECOG PS. Additional consolidative thoracic radiotherapy may also benefit ES-SCLC patients.

A Multicenter Study Assessing the Real-World Use and Effectiveness of First-Line Chemotherapy Plus Immunotherapy in Advanced Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Patients

BACKGROUND

First-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (CT-IO) has recently demonstrated survival benefits over CT alone in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), based on randomized phase III studies. This retrospective multicenter study assessed the real-world use and effectiveness of CT-IO in ES-SCLC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All newly diagnosed ES-SCLC patients from 4 French hospitals treated with CT alone or CT-IO between May 2020 and December 2021 were included. Overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) in univariate and multivariate models. The aim was not to compare efficacy between groups.

RESULTS

Among 104 patients, 75 (72.1%) received CT-IO. Brain metastases were diagnosed in 28.3% of patients, and 29.8% were performance status (PS) ≥ 2. At a median follow-up of 16.8 months (95%CI, 14.9-23.4), the median OS was 11.4 months (95%CI, 7.7-14.7) in the CT-IO group, and the 12-month OS rate was 43.6% (95%CI, 33.3-57.2). In the CT group, the median OS was 7.8 months (95%CI, 5.4-11.8) and the 12-month OS rate was 15.3% (95%CI, 5.7-41.0). In multivariate analyses, baseline brain and liver metastases were associated with a shorter OS for patients treated in the CT-IO group (HR, 3.80 [95%CI, 1.90-7.60] and 3.12 [95%CI, 1.60-6.08] respectively; P < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSION

We showed that clinicians have chosen to use IO beyond the specific criteria defined in guidelines. Survival data appeared promising with a median OS comparable to the one previously demonstrated in clinical trials.

Real-world impact of the introduction of chemo-immunotherapy in extended small cell lung cancer: a multicentric analysis

Background

Recent clinical trials demonstrated longer survival in extended small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy in addition to chemotherapy. However, the magnitude of benefit is modest and the impact in real-world setting has to be fully established.

Methods

We collected clinical data and radiological imaging of patients affected by extended or relapsing SCLC and consecutively treated according to clinical practice between 2016 and 2023. As primary end-point, we compared pre-defined outcome indicators before and after the introduction of chemo-immunotherapy (May 2020): 6-month and 12-month progression free survival (PFS) rate, 12-month and 18-month overall survival (OS). Among those who were treated after May 2020, patients who did not receive immunotherapy according to treating physician's choice were included in the analysis to minimize clinical selection bias.

Results

The analysis included 214 patients: 132 (61.7%) were treated in an Academic cancer center and 82 (38.3%) in two community hospitals; 104 were treated before May 2020. Median PFS of the overall study population was 4.8 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 4.4-5.4), median OS was 7.1 months (95% CI: 6.3-7.7). Estimated PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients treated after May 2020 with hazard ratio (HR) for PFS and OS of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.46-0.81, p < 0.001) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.52-0.93, p = 0.015), respectively. 6-month PFS rate increased from 27% to 40% (p = 0.04) while 12-months PFS raised from 1% to 11% (p = 0.003). 12-month and 18-month OS rate increased from 15% to 28% (p = 0.03) and from 2.1% to 12% (p = 0.009), respectively. After May 2020 the median number of hospitalization days per patient decreased significantly and the incidence of severe AEs was similar. Among patients treated with chemo-immunotherapy, the onset of immune-related AEs was associated with improved PFS and OS (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.35-0.89, p = 0.012 and HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.28-0.77, p = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusions

The real-world analysis shows a meaningful improvement of outcome indicators after the introduction of chemo-immunotherapy, with reduction of the duration of hospitalization, thus supporting the use of chemo-immunotherapy and the need for further biomarker research.

A retrospective real-world experience of immunotherapy in patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment of extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has only made modest progress in the past decade, with two immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), atezolizumab and durvalumab, approved for the treatment of SCLC by January 2022. However, currently, there is limited real-world data on ES-SCLC patients received immunotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed the demographic and treatment data of ES-SCLC patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2017 to January 2022. Survival and prognosis information was obtained through follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 353 ES-SCLC patients were included, of which 165 received immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy as the first-line (FL) treatment (chemo-immune group), and 188 received chemotherapy (chemotherapy group). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of patients receiving immunotherapy as the FL treatment were better than the chemotherapy group (76.97% vs. 48.40%, p < 0.001, and 83.03% vs. 68.09%, p < 0.001). Moreover, the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of ES-SCLC patients receiving immunotherapy as the FL treatment were better than the chemotherapy group (6.7 months vs. 5.1 months, p < 0.001, and 12.5 months vs. 11.2 months, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the OS of ES-SCLC patients who received immunotherapy as second-line treatment was better than that in the chemotherapy group (15.9 months vs. 12.9 months, p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

ICIs combined with chemotherapy as the FL treatment could be beneficial to the ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS of ES-SCLC patients. Furthermore, ES-SCLC patients can benefit from ICIs in the second-line treatment, even if they had not received ICIs in the FL treatment.

Role of consolidative thoracic radiation in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with first-line chemoimmunotherapy: a retrospective study from a single cancer center

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of consolidative thoracic radiation (TRT) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) receiving first-line chemo-immunotherapy followed by immunotherapy maintenance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Outcomes of patients without disease progression after first-line chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed (January 2020 to December 2021). Based on TRT or not, patients were allocated to TRT group or non-TRT group. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and local-recurrence free survival (LRFS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of 100 patients, 47 received TRT and 53 non-TRT. The median follow-up was 20.3 months. The median PFS and OS in TRT were 9.1 months and 21.8 months, versus 8.8 months (p = 0.93) and 24.3 months (p = 0.63), respectively, in non-TRT. The median LRFS time in TRT was not reached, but significantly longer than 10.8 months in non-TRT (HR = 0.27, p < 0.01). Second-line chemotherapy significantly prolonged survival compared to that with chemo-free patients (mOS: 24.5 vs. 21.4 months, p = 0.026). The subgroup analysis showed a trend of patients with brain metastases benefit from TRT (21.8 versus 13.7 months, HR 0.61, p = 0.38) while liver metastases did not. Of 47 patients with TRT, only 10.6% of patients experienced grade 3 radiation-induced pneumonitis, while no grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Consolidative TRT in the period of immunotherapy maintenance followed first-line chemo-immunotherapy did not prolong OS and PFS but associated with improved LRFS in ES-SCLC.

Is consolidative thoracic radiotherapy of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer still beneficial in the era of immunotherapy? A retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) carries a dismal prognosis. The benefit of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TR) after first-line chemoimmunotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitors in this setting remains unclear. As TR can improve overall survival (OS) after conventional chemotherapy, we retrospectively analyzed OS of an inhouse cohort treated either with TR or with chemoimmunotherapy alone.

METHODS

A total of 41 patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab or durvalumab) for ES-SCLC at our hospital since 2019 were analyzed. TR was administered in 10 fractions of 3 Gy. Patient characteristics, number of immunotherapy cycles received, brain irradiation, and presence of hepatic and cerebral metastasis at diagnosis were assessed. Primary endpoint was OS after first diagnosis.

RESULTS

Consolidative TR was associated with a significantly longer OS than systemic therapy alone (1-year OS 78.6% and 2‑year OS 37.1% vs. 1‑year OS 39.7% and 2 years not reached, p = 0.019). With regard to radiotherapy indication, survival at 1 year was 88.9% (log-rank p = 0.016) for patients receiving consolidative TR. For patients receiving TR in case of progression, 1‑year survival was 66.7%. Hepatic and cerebral metastasis at first diagnosis had no significant effect on OS.

CONCLUSION

TR was significantly associated with longer OS. The survival benefit of TR was most pronounced for consolidative radiotherapy after initial chemoimmunotherapy compared to TR in case of progression. Although retrospective findings need to be interpreted with caution, in the absence of prospective data, our findings provide a basis for offering consolidative TR in the era of chemoimmunotherapy.

Real-world evaluation of atezolizumab and etoposide-carboplatin as a first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Despite the obvious benefits of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to platinum-etoposide chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), real-world data remain scarce.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 89 patients with ES-SCLC treated with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy alone (chemo-only group; n = 48) or in combination with atezolizumab (atezolizumab group; n = 41) and compared the survival outcomes between these two groups.

RESULTS

Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the atezolizumab group than in the chemo-only group (15.2 months vs. 8.5 months; p = 0.047), whereas the median progression-free survival was almost the same (5.1 months vs. 5.0 months) in both groups (p = 0.754). Subsequent multivariate analysis revealed that thoracic radiation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.223; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.092-0.537; p = 0.001) and atezolizumab administration (HR, 0.350; 95% CI, 0.184-0.668; p = 0.001) were favorable prognostic factors for OS. In the thoracic radiation subgroup, patients who received atezolizumab demonstrated favorable survival outcomes and no grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs).

CONCLUSION

The addition of atezolizumab to platinum-etoposide resulted in favorable outcomes in this real-world study. Thoracic radiation was associated with improved OS and acceptable AE risk in combination with immunotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC.

Clinical and molecular features of pulmonary NUT carcinoma characterizes diverse responses to immunotherapy, with a pathologic complete response case

PURPOSE

Nuclear protein in testis (NUT) carcinoma is an uncommon malignant cancer characterized by NUTM1 rearrangement. We aimed to investigate the clinicopathological and molecular features and immunotherapy of pulmonary NUT carcinoma.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for NUT (C52B1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1: 22C3) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for NUTM1 break and BRD4-NUTM1 fusion were performed on six pulmonary NUT carcinoma samples.

RESULTS

The 6 pulmonary NUT carcinoma samples were obtained from 5 males and 1 female, with ages ranging from 31 to 73 years (average, 46 years). Five tumors occurred in the lobes, with one in the trachea. Pathologically, all cases showed primitive-appearing round to epithelioid cells growing in nests and sheets. Squamous differentiation and abrupt keratinization were observed. All tumors expressed the NUT protein and p63, and 4 tumors showed focal synaptophysin, but PD-L1 expression was not observed. All cases displayed NUTM1 rearrangement, 5 had BRD4-NUTM1 fusion, and one had an unknown partner. Three patients presented regional lymph node involvement at diagnosis. Five patients underwent intensive radiation and/or chemotherapy. Furthermore, 2 patients (1 and 2) received a combination of PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy. Patient 1 exhibited a poor response and soon showed tumor progression and metastasis; however, patient 2 responded remarkably and achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) without uncontrollable adverse events. The overall survival time was 2.9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary NUT carcinoma exhibits poorly differentiated morphological features with diffuse NUT staining, low PD-L1 expression, and NUTM1 rearrangement. Despite its poor prognosis, it presents a diverse response to immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) need to be further explored in NUT carcinoma.

Outcomes of Chemoimmunotherapy Among Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer According to Potential Clinical Trial Eligibility

IMPORTANCE

Chemoimmunotherapy is the standard first-line therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, whether findings from pivotal trials can be extrapolated to the clinical practice setting remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To compare treatment outcome gaps following first-line chemoimmunotherapy for patients with ES-SCLC between those who met and did not meet the eligibility criteria used in previous clinical trials.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A prospective cohort study was conducted from September 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020, at 32 hospitals in Japan, with at least 12 months of follow-up. Participants included consecutive patients with ES-SCLC who received carboplatin and etoposide with atezolizumab as first-line therapy.

EXPOSURES

Patients who met eligibility criteria for pivotal phase 3 clinical trials were considered trial-eligible.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was 6-month progression-free survival. The secondary outcomes were differences in progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety according to whether key clinical trial eligibility criteria were met.

RESULTS

A total of 207 patients were analyzed (median age, 72 years; range, 46-87 years; 170 [82%] were male). Sixty-four patients (31%) were older adults (age ≥75 years), and most (184 [89%]) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. There were 132 (64%) trial-eligible patients. The 6-month progression-free survival rate for all patients was 38.8% (95% CI, 32.4%-45.7%). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in trial-eligible patients and 4.7 months in trial-ineligible patients (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97; P = .03). The proportion of patients who achieved disease control was 93% (118 of 127) in trial-eligible patients and 77% (55 of 71) in trial-ineligible patients (P = .002). The median overall survival was 15.8 months in trial-eligible patients and 13.1 months in trial-ineligible patients (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.51-1.07; P = .10). The rate of severe adverse events was numerically higher among trial-ineligible patients than among trial-eligible patients (39% vs 27%; P = .07).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, the overall treatment outcome was comparable to that reported in pivotal clinical trials. However, treatment outcomes after chemoimmunotherapy might differ between trial-eligible and trial-ineligible patients. These findings suggest that trial-eligibility criteria may be useful in clinical practice, and further studies using data from clinical practice settings are required to inform regulatory approval and clinical decision-making.

Advances in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a group of drugs designed to improve the therapeutic effects on various types of malignant tumors. Irrespective of monotherapy or combinational therapies as first-line and later-line therapy, ICIs have achieved benefits for various tumors. Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) / ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immune checkpoint that suppresses antitumor immunity, especially in the tumor microenvironment (TME). PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors block tumor-related downregulation of the immune system, thereby enhancing antitumor immunity. In comparison with traditional small-molecule drugs, ICIs exhibit pharmacokinetic characteristics owing to their high molecular weight. Furthermore, different types of ICIs exhibit different pharmacodynamic characteristics. Hence, ICIs have been approved for different indications by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Medical Products Administration (NMPA). This review summarizes pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of PD-1/ PD-L1 inhibitors to provide a reference for rational clinical application.