Intrathoracic Progression Is Still the Most Dominant Failure Pattern after First-Line Chemo-immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Implications for Thoracic Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the failure patterns before and after the introduction of immunotherapy and to determine the role of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 294 patients with ES-SCLC, of which 62.2% underwent chemotherapy alone, 13.3% underwent chemotherapy followed by consolidative TRT (TRT group), and 24.5% underwent chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI group). We performed propensity-score matching (PSM) to compare each treatment group.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 10.4 months. At the first relapse, in the cohort showing objective response, the proportion of cases showing intrathoracic progression was significantly lower in the TRT group (37.8%) than in the chemotherapy-alone (77.2%, p < 0.001) and the ICI (60.3%, p=0.03) groups. Furthermore, in the subgroup analysis, TRT showed benefits related to intrathoracic progression-free survival (PFS) in comparison with ICI in patients with less than two involved extrathoracic sites (p=0.008) or without liver metastasis (p=0.02) or pleural metastasis (p=0.005) at diagnosis. After PSM, the TRT group showed significantly better intrathoracic PFS than both chemotherapy-alone and ICI groups (p < 0.001 and p=0.04, respectively), but showed no significant benefit in terms of PFS and overall survival in comparison with the ICI group (p=0.17 and p=0.31, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In ES-SCLC, intrathoracic progression was the most dominant failure pattern after immunotherapy. In the era of chemoimmunotherapy, consolidative TRT can still be considered a useful treatment strategy for locoregional control.

Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: a propensity score matched multicentre retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Platinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been recommended as the first-line standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the effect of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) on these patients is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRT for ES-SCLC patients who responded to first-line ICIs and chemotherapy (CHT).

METHODS

Patients who received 4 to 6 cycles of ICIs and CHT as first-line therapy at three hospitals between 2018 and 2022 were included in the analysis. All patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received TRT as first-line treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to ensure that the characteristics of two groups were well-balanced. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was toxic effects.

RESULTS

A total of 276 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 22.3 (range, 4.0-53.73) months. After PSM, 197 patients were further analysed, and 99 of whom received TRT. The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between patients in the TRT and non-TRT groups. There were significant differences in PFS between the TRT and non-TRT groups, with the median PFS of 10.76 and 7.63 months, respectively (P = 0.014). Significantly improved OS was observed in the TRT group (21.67 vs. 16.6 months, P = 0.009). In addition, the use of TRT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS of ES-SCLC patients receiving ICIs plus CHT. In terms of safety, no significant increase of any grades adverse event (AE) (P = 0.874) and G3-4 AE (P = 0.909) was observed for patients receiving TRT. Radiation esophagitis, gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were the most common AEs in TRT group, which were tolerable. And high-dose radiotherapy was associated with higher incidence of pneumonitis.

CONCLUSION

Addition of TRT showed significant survival benefits and well tolerability in ES-SCLC patients receiving platinum-etoposide CHT and ICIs, which could be a feasible first-line treatment strategy for ES-SCLC patients.

Radiation pneumonitis after concurrent aumolertinib and thoracic radiotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The superior efficacy of concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has been proven in locally advanced and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. However, the high incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) reduced by concurrent TRT and TKIs has attracted widespread attention. Thus, this study was designed to investigate the rate and risk factors for RP in EGFR-positive NSCLC patients simultaneously treated with aumolertinib and TRT.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated stage IIIA-IVB NSCLC patients treated with concurrent aumolertinib and TRT between May 2020 and December 2022 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong, China. RP was diagnosed by two senior radiologists and then graded from 1 to 5 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. All risk factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients were included, the incidence of grade ≥ 2 RP was 42.9%. Grade 2 and 3 RP were observed in 28.6% and 14.3% of patients, respectively. Grade 4 to 5 RP were not observed. the gross total volume (GTV) ≥ 21 ml and ipsilateral lung V20 ≥ 25% were risk factors for RP. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the first-line therapy group and second-line therapy group were 23.5 months and 17.2 months, respectively (p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Better local control is achieved with concurrent TRT and aumolertinib, and special attention should be given to controlling ipsilateral lung V20 and GTV to reduce the risk of RP.

Treatment-related pneumonitis after thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the risk factors of treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP) following thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD‑1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients with advanced ESCC who were treated with thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD‑1 mAbs. Among them, 56 patients received concurrent radiotherapy with anti-PD‑1 mAbs and 41 patients received sequential radiotherapy with anti-PD‑1 mAbs. The median prescribed planning target volume (PTV) dose was 59.4 Gy (range from 50.4 to 66 Gy, 1.8-2.2 Gy/fraction). Clinical characteristics, the percentage of lung volume receiving more than 5-50 Gy in increments of 5 Gy (V5-V50, respectively) and the mean lung dose (MLD) were analyzed as potential risk factors for TRP.

RESULTS

46.4% (45/97), 20.6% (20/97), 20.6% (20/97), 4.1% (4/97), and 1.0% (1/97) of the patients developed any grade of TRP, grade 1 TRP, grade 2 TRP, grade 3 TRP, and fatal (grade 5) TRP, respectively. Anti-PD‑1 mAbs administered concurrently with radiotherapy, V5, V10, V15, V25, V30, V35, V40 and MLD were associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher TRP. Concurrent therapy (P = 0.010, OR = 3.990) and V5 (P = 0.001, OR = 1.126) were independent risk factors for grade 2 or higher TRP. According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal V5 threshold for predicting grade 2 or higher TRP was 55.7%.

CONCLUSION

The combination of thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy with anti-PD‑1 mAbs displayed a tolerable pulmonary safety profile. Although the incidence of TRP was high, grade 1-2 TRP accounted for the majority. Anti-PD‑1 mAbs administered concurrently with radiotherapy and the lung V5 were significantly associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher TRP. Therefore, it seems safer to control V5 below 55% in clinical, especially for the high-risk populations receiving concurrent therapy.

Reflecting on the cardiac toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a widely used treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the combination with traditional radiotherapy (RT) has shown significant potential in prolonging patient survival. However, both thoracic RT and ICIs can lead to cardiac toxicity, including radiation-induced heart damage (RIHD) and immunotherapy-related heart damage (IRHD). It still remains uncertain whether the combination of thoracic RT and immunotherapy will exacerbate acute or late cardiovascular (CV) toxicity and incidence. In this review, we summarize safety data from relevant clinical studies regarding CV toxicity for the combination therapy in NSCLC patients, explore the underlying synergetic mechanisms and common risk factors, and proposed treatment and management strategies. We hope to increase emphasis on the long-term assessment of CV toxicity risks associated with the combination therapy, and reduce the incidence of CV deaths resulting from such regimens.

Real-world outcomes of PD-L1 inhibitors combined with thoracic radiotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The CREST study showed that the addition of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) could improve the survival rate in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but whether TRT can bring survival benefit in the era of immunotherapy remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of adding TRT to the combination of PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy.

METHODS

The patients who received durvalumab or atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC from January 2019 to December 2021 were enrolled. They were divided into two groups, based on whether they received TRT or not. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio was performed. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients with ES-SCLC were enrolled, of whom 70 (33.2%) patients received standard therapy plus TRT as first-line treatment, and 141 (66.8%) patients in the control group received PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy. After PSM, a total of 57 pairs of patients were enrolled in the analysis. In all patients, the median PFS (mPFS) in the TRT and non-TRT group was 9.5 and 7.2 months, respectively, with HR = 0.59 (95%CI 0.39-0.88, p = 0.009). The median OS (mOS) in the TRT group was also significantly longer than that in the non-TRT group (24.1 months vs. 18.5 months, HR = 0.53, 95%CI 0.31-0.89, p = 0.016). Multivariable analysis showed that baseline liver metastasis and the number of metastases ≥ 3 were independent prognostic factors for OS. Addition of TRT increased the incidence of treatment-related pneumonia (p = 0.018), most of which were grade 1-2.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of TRT to durvalumab or atezolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves survival in ES-SCLC. Although it may leads to increased incidence of treatment-related pneumonia, a majority of the cases can be relieved after symptomatic treatment.

Palliative Radiotherapy for Non-metastatic Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: Impact of Blood Test Results on Survival

BACKGROUND/AIM

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) not amenable to curative treatment can be managed with palliative thoracic radiation or chemoradiation, however, with variable success. This study evaluated the prognostic impact of the LabBM score [serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein, albumin, hemoglobin, platelets] in 56 patients who were scheduled to receive at least 10 fractions of 3 Gy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Uni- and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival were employed in a retrospective single-institution study of stage II and III NSCLC.

RESULTS

The first multivariate analysis showed that hospitalization in the month before radiotherapy (p<0.001), concomitant chemoradiotherapy (p=0.03), and LabBM point sum (p=0.09) were the leading predictors of survival. A second model with individual blood tests rather than the sum score suggested that concomitant chemoradiotherapy (p=0.002), hemoglobin (p=0.01), LDH (p=0.04), and hospitalization before radiotherapy (p=0.08) played important roles. Surprisingly long survival was seen in patients without prior hospitalization who received concomitant chemoradiotherapy and had favorable LabBM score (0-1 points): median 24 months, 5-year rate 46%.

CONCLUSION

Blood biomarkers provide relevant prognostic information. The LabBM score has 1) previously been validated in patients with brain metastases and 2) demonstrated encouraging results in a cohort irradiated for different palliative non-brain indications, e.g., bone metastases. It might be helpful in predicting survival in patients with non-metastatic cancer, e.g., NSCLC stage II and III.

Pre-radiotherapy systemic immune inflammation index associated with overall survival in patients with advanced EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer receiving thoracic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic potential of the pre-radiotherapy systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) for the survival of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, which might provide a basis for optimizing the comprehensive treatment scheme.

METHODS

A total of 111 lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations, who received thoracic radiotherapy, were included in this retrospective study. The primary endpoint of the study was based on the overall survival (OS) of patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off value of each immune inflammation index. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for the comparison of OS. The Cox proportional-hazard model was used for the multivariate and univariate regression analyses to determine the correlations of prognostic factors with the disease.

RESULTS

SII was divided into the high SII group (≥ 620.2; 45.95%) and the low SII group (SII < 620.2; 54.05%) based on the optimal cutoff values. The median OS rates were 53.3 and 33.3 months in the low and high SII groups, respectively, showing statistically significant differences ( hazard ratio (HR) = 0.459; 95% CI 0.286-0.736; P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis showed that, after adjusting for the significant covariates, the SII values were independently associated with the improved OS of the patients (adjusted HR = 0.444; 95% CI 0.279-0.709; P = 0.001). The low NLR values were associated with the better OS of patients (HR = 0.509; 95% CI 0.326-0.792; P = 0.005) and vice versa (HR = 0.422; 95% CI 0.213-0.836; P < 0.001). The patients in the low LMR group before radiotherapy exhibited longer OS as compared to those in the high LMR group (HR = 0.497; 95% CI 0.308-0.802; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that these inflammatory indices might have an important prognostic potential for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations, receiving thoracic radiotherapy and might provide a basis for the individualized treatment of these patients.

Treatment patterns and prognosis of patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC after completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy ± immune checkpoint inhibition: a decade-long single-center historical analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of treatment time and patterns in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) ± immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

Patients were stratified by treatment year: A (2011-2014), B (2015-2017) and C (2018-2020). Tumor- and treatment-related characteristics regarding locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six consecutive patients were analyzed. All patients completed thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) to a total dose ≥ 60.0 Gy; 36 (26%) patients received ICI. Median PFS in subgroups A, B and C was 8.0, 8.2 and 26.3 months (p = 0.007). Median OS was 19.9 months, 23.4 months and not reached (NR), respectively. In group C, median LRRFS and PFS were 27.2 vs. NR; and 14.2 vs. 26.3 months in patients treated with and without ICI. On multivariate analysis planning target volume (PTV) ≥ 700 cc was a negative prognosticator of LRRFS (HR 2.194; p = 0.001), PFS (HR 1.522; p = 0.042) and OS (HR 2.883; p = 0.001); ICI was a predictor of LRRFS (HR 0.497; p = 0.062), PFS (HR 0.571; p = 0.071) and OS (HR 0.447; p = 0.1). In the non-ICI cohort, multivariate analyses revealed PTV ≥ 700 cc (p = 0.047) and a maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) ≥ 13.75 (p = 0.012) were predictors of PFS; PTV ≥ 700 cc (p = 0.017), SUV_max ≥ 13.75 (p = 0.002) and a total lung V20 ≥ 30% (V20 ≥ 30) (p < 0.05) were predictors of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated after 2018 had improved survival regardless of ICI use. Implementation of ICI resulted in further significant increase of all tested survival endpoints. PTV ≥ 700 cc and ICI were only prognosticators for LRRFS, PFS and OS in the analyzed cohort.

Serum lactate dehydrogenase predicts brain metastasis and survival in limited-stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by a high risk of brain metastasis and poor survival. This study aims to assess the prognostic role of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) treated with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI).

METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluated 197 consecutive patients who underwent TRT and PCI for LS-SCLC between November 2005 and October 2017. Both pretreatment and maximal serum LDH levels (mLDH) during treatment were checked, and an increased LDH level was defined as more than 240 IU/ml. Clinical factors were tested for associations with intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS) and overall survival (OS) after PCI. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were carried out to identify variables associated with survival.

RESULTS

Of the total patients, 28 had higher pretreatment LDH levels and mLDH levels were increased in 95 patients during treatment. In patients in the normal and elevated mLDH groups, the 1‑, 2‑, and 5‑year IPFS rates were 96.7% vs. 90.1%, 91.7% vs. 73.8%, and 87.8% vs. 61.0% (P < 0.01), respectively. Compared to those with normal LDH levels, patients with increased mLDH levels had a higher cumulative risk of intracranial metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-8.63; P < 0.01) and worse overall survival (HR 2.59; 95% CI 1.67-4.04; P < 0.01). The factors LDH level at baseline or changes between pretreatment level and maximum level during treatment failed to predict brain metastases or OS with statistical significance. In the multivariate analyses, both mLDH during treatment (HR 3.53; 95% CI 1.57-7.92; P = 0.002) and patient age ≥ 60 (HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.22-4.94; P = 0.012) were independently associated with worse IPFS. Factors significantly associated with worse OS included mLDH during treatment (HR 2.45; 95% CI 1.56-3.86; P < 0.001), IIIB stage (HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.06-2.88; P = 0.029), and conventional radiotherapy applied in TRT (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.04-2.65; P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

The mLDH level during treatment predicts brain metastasis and survival in LS-SCLC patients treated with TRT and PCI, which may provide valuable information for identifying patients with poor survival outcomes and possible candidates for treatment intensification.

MR-guided radiotherapy in node-positive non-small cell lung cancer and severely limited pulmonary reserve: a report proposing a new clinical pathway for the management of high-risk patients

INTRODUCTION

Online MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a relatively novel advancement in the field of radiation oncology, ensuring superior soft-tissue visualisation, allowing for online plan adaptation to anatomical and functional interfractional changes and improved motion management. Platinum-based chemoradiation followed by durvalumab is the recommended treatment for stage IIB(N1)/III NSCLC. However, this is only the case for patients with favourable risk factors and sufficient pulmonary function and reserve.

METHODS

Herein, we present a technical report on tumour motion and breathing curve analyses of the first patient with node-positive stage IIB NSCLC and severely compromised pulmonary function and reserve [total lung capacity (TLC) 8.78L/132% predicted, residual volume (RV) 6.35L/271% predicted, vital capacity (VC) max 2.43L/58% predicted, FEV1 1.19L/38% predicted, DLCO-SB corrected for hemoglobin 2.76 mmol/min/kPa/30% predicted] treated in a prospective observational study with moderately hypofractionated MRgRT to a total dose of 48.0 Gy/16 daily fractions on the MRIdian system (Viewray Inc, Oakwood, USA).

RESULTS

Radiotherapy was well tolerated with no relevant toxicity. First follow-up imaging at 3 months post-radiotherapy showed a partial remission. The distinctive features of this case are the patient's severely compromised pulmonary function and the first online MR-guided accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy treatment for primary node-positive NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

This technical report describes the first patient treated in a prospective observational study evaluating the feasibility of this relatively novel technology in stage IIB(N1)/III disease, proposing a clinical pathway for the management of high-risk patients.

Trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 expression in lung cancer patients and the effects of anti-cancer treatments

BACKGROUND

Trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2) is expressed on the surface of trophoblast cells and many malignant tumor cells. However, data on TROP2 expression in advanced lung cancer are insufficient, and its changes have not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

We assessed the prevalence and changes in TROP2 expression in patients with lung cancer who received anti-cancer treatments using immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis with an anti-TROP2 antibody (clone: SP295). IHC scores were graded from 0 to 3; grade ≥ 2 was considered positive for TROP2 expression. We defined a difference in IHC score, before and after anti-cancer treatments, as the change in TROP2 expression.

RESULTS

Before anti-cancer treatment, TROP2 expression was observed in 89% (143/160) of the patients and was significantly more common in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma than in neuroendocrine carcinoma (P < 0.001). After anti-cancer treatment, TROP2 expression was observed in 87% (139/160) of the patients. The distribution of TROP2 expression in post-treatment samples was analogous to that in pre-treatment samples when compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P = 0.509). However, an increase in TROP2 expression was seen in 19 (12%), and a decrease in 20 (13%) patients. Patients treated with targeted therapy showed significantly higher changes in TROP2 expression (P = 0.019) and thoracic radiotherapy was more likely to increase TROP2 expression than chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

Although some anti-cancer treatments might alter the TROP2 expression, TROP2 was expressed in most lung cancer specimens before and after anti-cancer treatments. These results support the development of TROP2-directed therapy against advanced lung cancer in various treatment lines.

A Dose-finding Study Followed by a Phase II Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Veliparib in Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: SWOG 1206 (8811)

BACKGROUND

We conducted a 2-part study to evaluate the incorporation of veliparib, a PARP inhibitor, into chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the phase I part, patients were treated successively at 3 dose levels of veliparib (40, 80, and 120 mg) twice daily during CRT. In the phase II part, patients were randomized to receive veliparib or placebo during thoracic radiotherapy with concurrent weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by 2 cycles of consolidation carboplatin and paclitaxel with veliparib or placebo. The study was prematurely discontinued owing to the emergence of adjuvant immunotherapy as standard of care.

RESULTS

Of 21 patients enrolled in phase I, 2 patients developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): 1 grade 3 esophagitis with dysphagia (at 40 mg) and 1 grade 3 esophagitis with dehydration (at 80 mg). No DLTs were seen at veliparib dose of 120 mg twice daily, which was selected for the phase II part that enrolled 31 eligible patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was not different between the 2 arms (P = .20). For the veliparib and placebo arms, response rates were 56% and 69%, PFS at 1 year 47% and 46%, and overall survival at 1 year 89% and 54%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Veliparib with CRT was feasible and well tolerated. Efficacy could not accurately be determined because of early study closure. Nonetheless, there is enthusiasm for the evaluation of PARP inhibitors in lung cancer as predictive biomarkers are being developed and combinations with immunotherapy are attractive.

Radiation pneumonitis after palliative radiotherapy in cancer patients with interstitial lung disease

PURPOSE

The risk of radiation pneumonitis (RP) after palliative radiotherapy (RT) in cancer patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, severity, and predictive factors of RP among patients with ILD who received palliative RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The medical records of cancer patients with ILD who received palliative RT involving a lung field between January 2008 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Screening for ILD was performed by using the ICD-10 diagnosis code, and the ILD was evaluated on the basis of pretreatment computed tomography (CT). RP was scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Associations between both clinical and dosimetric factors and RP were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were included in the analysis. The median prescribed physical dose of RT was 25 Gy (range, 6-40 Gy). The RP was graded 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in 6 (10%), 3 (5%), 1 (2%), 2 (3%), and 6 (10%) patients, respectively. The median time to onset of grade 3 or more RP (≥Gr3 RP) was 39 days (range, 10-155). The results of the multivariate analysis indicated that ILD pattern was a significant predictive factor for ≥Gr3 RP (odds ratio, 12.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1664; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RT involving a lung field, even when prescribed with palliative intent, should be administered carefully to ILD patients. Evaluation of the ILD pattern on pretreatment CT images may be of help in determining whether to perform RT.

consolidative approaches

PURPOSE

This study sought to design and validate a nomogram capable of predicting outcomes in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients with superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) based upon the timing of their radiotherapy treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 175 ES-SCLC patients with SCVS, comparing outcomes between those that underwent upfront thoracic radiotherapy (initial radiotherapy with simultaneous chemotherapy) and those that underwent consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (following 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy). Significant predictors of patient outcomes were identified using a Cox proportional hazard model and were used to construct our nomogram. This model was subsequently validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, concordance index (C-index) values, and a risk classification system in order to evaluate its discriminative and predictive accuracy.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) of ES-SCLC patients with SVCS that underwent chemotherapy (CT), consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cc-TRT), and upfront thoracic radiotherapy (cu-TRT) was 8.2, 11.7, and 14.9 months, respectively (p < 0.001), with respective progression-free survival (PFS) durations of 3.3, 5.0, and 7.3 months (p < 0.001). A multivariate regression analysis revealed age, gender, ECOG performance status, sites of tumor metastasis, and treatment approach to all be independent predictors of survival outcomes. A nomogram was therefore developed incorporating these factors. C‑index values upon internal and external validation of this nomogram were 0.7625 and 0.7959, respectively, and ROC and calibration curves revealed this model to be accurate and consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that upfront thoracic radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy may be associated with a positive impact on outcomes in ES-SCLC patients with SVCS.

Phase I trial of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib in combination with thoracic radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signalling pathway has a pivotal role in cancer proliferation and modulating treatment response. Selumetinib inhibits MEK and enhances effects of radiotherapy in preclinical studies.

Patients and methods

Single-arm, single-centre, open-label phase I trial. Patients with stage III NSCLC unsuitable for concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, or stage IV with dominant thoracic symptoms, were recruited to a dose-finding stage (Fibonacci 3 + 3 design; maximum number = 18) then an expanded cohort (n = 15). Oral selumetinib was administered twice daily (starting dose 50 mg) commencing 7 days prior to thoracic radiotherapy, then with radiotherapy (6-6.5 weeks; 60-66 Gy/30-33 fractions). The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of selumetinib in combination with thoracic radiotherapy.

Results

21 patients were enrolled (06/2010-02/2015). Median age: 62y (range 50-73). M:F ratio 12(57%):9(43%). ECOG PS 0:1, 7(33%):14(67%). Stage III 16(76%); IV 5(24%). Median GTV 64 cm³ (range 1-224 cm³). 15 patients comprised the expanded cohort at starting dose. All 21 patients completed thoracic radiotherapy as planned and received induction chemotherapy. 13 (62%) patients received the full dose of selumetinib.In the starting cohort no enhanced radiotherapy-related toxicity was seen. Two patients had dose-limiting toxicity (1x grade 3 diarrhoea/fatigue and 1x pulmonary embolism). Commonest grade 3-4 adverse events: lymphopaenia (19/21 patients) and hypertension (7/21 patients). One patient developed grade 3 oesophagitis. No patients developed grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis. Two patients were alive at the time of analysis (24 and 26 months follow-up, respectively). Main cause of first disease progression: distant metastases ± locoregional progression (12/21 [57.1%] patients). Six patients had confirmed/suspected pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia.

Conclusion

We report poor outcome and severe lymphopenia in most patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy and selumetinib at RP2D in combination, contributing to confirmed/clinically suspected pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia. These results suggest that this combination should not be pursued in a phase II trial.ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT01146756.

Overlap time is an independent risk factor of radiation pneumonitis for patients treated with simultaneous EGFR-TKI and thoracic radiotherapy

Background

The exact rate and relevant risk factors of radiation pneumonitis (RP) for non-small-cell cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with the combination of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and thoracic radiotherapy have not been reported. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the rate and risk factors of RP for EGFR-positive NSCLC patients simultaneously treated with first-generation EGFR-TKI and TRT.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively evaluated NSCLC patients simultaneously treated with first-generation EGFR-TKI and thoracic radiotherapy between January 2012 and December 2019 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong, China. RP was diagnosed via computed tomography and was classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. The risk factors of RP were identified using uni- and multivariate analyses.

Results

Of the 67 patients included, 44.78% (30/67) developed grade ≥ 2 RP. Grade ≥ 2 RP occurred within a median of 3.48 (range 1.07–13.6) months. The EGFR-TKI icotinib, ipsilateral lung V30 > 34%, and overlap time of > 20 days between EGFR-TKI and thoracic radiotherapy were identified to be independent predictive factors of grade ≥ 2 RP.

Conclusions

Grade ≥ 2 RP is highly frequent in NSCLC patients simultaneous treated with first-generation EGFR-TKI and thoracic radiotherapy. Icotinib, ipsilateral lung V30 ≤ 34%, and overlap time of ≤ 20 days for EGFR-TKI and thoracic radiotherapy will be helpful to lower the risk of RP in these patients. The addition of thoracic radiotherapy should be cautious, and the treatment strategies can be optimized to reduce the rate of RP for patients treat with simultaneous EGFR-TKI and thoracic radiotherapy.

Is there a place for optimizing thoracic radiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer after twenty years?

Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is one of the main treatments in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Hyperfractionated TRT (45 Gy, 1.5 Gy twice daily) has been the standard of care (SOC) since Turrisi and colleagues published the results of their clinical trial in 1999. Two meta-analyses have demonstrated the benefits of concurrent chemotherapy and TRT in terms of intrathoracic disease control at 2 years and 3-year overall survival (OS). The phase 2 trial by Grønberg et al (2016) comparing once-daily hypofractionated TRT to twice-daily hyperfractionated TRT in LS-SCLC found similar outcomes in both groups in terms of response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), grade 3-4 adverse effects, and OS. The CONVERT trial, published in 2017, failed to demonstrate the superiority of the conventional scheme (once-daily TRT) vs twice-daily radiotherapy, despite the application of modern radiotherapy techniques and a quality assurance programme, thus confirming the twice-daily hyperfractionated regimen as the SOC. At the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting, Grønberg et al reported preliminary findings from a phase 2 trial comparing two different TRT dose regimens (45 Gy vs 60 Gy), both administered twice daily. Those data demonstrated a marked improvement in 2-year survival rates in the high dose arm (70.2% vs 46.1%, P = 0.002), despite similar objective response rates and PFS outcomes. Those findings provide a new treatment alternative to consider: Hyperfractionated, high-dose TRT. However, the results of that trial will need to be validated in a large, randomized phase 3 study. The results of the phase 2 CALCG 30610 trial will help to clarify the optimal dose and regimen. The potential role of upfront immunotherapy, which early data suggest may improve OS, also needs to be determined.

Clinical outcomes and toxicity predictors of thoracic re-irradiation for locoregionally recurrent lung cancer

Background and purpose

Thoracic re-irradiation may be an alternative treatment for lung cancer patients who develop intrathoracic locoregional recurrence without systemic progression. This study aimed to retrospectively assess locoregional control, clinical outcomes, and toxicities in lung cancer patients who received thoracic re-irradiation.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 50 lung cancer patients who received thoracic re-irradiation using conventional photon radiotherapy (RT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) between 2009 and 2017. The correlations of clinicopathologic factors, treatment factors, and dosimetric factors of RT with time to local progression (TTLP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after starting thoracic re-irradiation were calculated using log-rank tests and Cox regression models.

Results

The median re-irradiation dose in equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions was 51.1 Gy, and the mean re-irradiation planning target volume was 201.58 ml. The median mean lung dose (MLD) was 4.18 Gy, and the total lung volumes receiving a dose of 5 Gy (lung V5) and of 20 Gy (V20) were 19.8% and 5.85%, respectively. The TTLP, PFS, and OS were 18.0, 5.9, and 25.1 months, respectively. Lung V5 (p < 0.001), V20 (p = 0.011), and MLD (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with grade ≥2 lung toxicity. Seven (14%) patients developed lethal lung events. Subsequent chemotherapy following thoracic re-irradiation was significantly correlated with lethal lung events (p = 0.009).

Conclusion

Promising local control can be achieved with thoracic re-irradiation in lung cancer patients with locoregional recurrence. However, unexpected lethal lung events may occur, especially in patients receiving systemic therapy following thoracic re-irradiation.

Elective Nodal Irradiation for Limited-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer: Survey of US Radiation Oncologists on Practice Patterns

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, elective nodal irradiation (ENI) has been used in clinical trials that have established thoracic radiotherapy as instrumental in improving survival for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). However, several reports have suggested that the omission of ENI might be appropriate. Current US practice patterns are unknown regarding ENI for patients with LS-SCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We surveyed US radiation oncologists via an institutional review board-approved questionnaire. The questions covered demographics, treatment recommendations, and self-assessed knowledge of key clinical trials. χ² and Cochran-Armitage tests were used to evaluate for statistically significant correlations between responses.

RESULTS

We received 309 responses. Of the respondents, 21% recommended ENI for N0 LS-SCLC, 29% for N1, and 30% for N2; 64% did not recommend ENI for any of these clinical scenarios. The respondents who recommended ENI were more likely to have been practicing for > 10 years (P < .001), more likely to be in private practice (P = .04), and less likely to be familiar with the ongoing Cancer and Leukemia Group B 30610 trial (P = .04). Almost all respondents (93%) prescribed the same radiation dose to the primary disease and involved lymph nodes. When delivering ENI, 36% prescribed the same dose to the involved and elective nodes, and 64% prescribed a lower dose to the elective nodes.

CONCLUSION

Nearly two thirds of respondents did not recommend ENI, which represents a shift in practice. A recent large clinical trial that omitted ENI reported greater overall survival than previously reported and lower-than-expected radiation toxicities, lending further evidence that omitting ENI should be considered a standard treatment strategy.

Timing of thoracic radiotherapy is more important than dose intensification in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a parallel comparison of two prospective studies

PURPOSE

The optimal radiotherapy dose/fraction for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is undefined. Our objectives were to compare efficacy between hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (TRT; 1.5 Gy 2 times per day [bid] in 30 fractions) and hypofractionated TRT (2.5 Gy once per day [qd] in 22 fractions), and to explore prognostic factors influencing the prognosis, such as the timing of TRT.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in two independent prospective studies were combined and analyzed. The primary endpoint was local/regional control (LRC). The prognosis was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Ninety-two and 96 patients were treated with hyperfractionated TRT and hypofractionated TRT, respectively. The 1‑ and 2‑year LRC rates of the two arms were 82.1 and 60.7%, and 84.9 and 68.8% (P = 0.27), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) times (months) were 28.3 (95% confidence interval, CI 16.4-40.1) and 22.0 (95% CI 16.4-27.5), while the 1‑year, 3‑year, and 5‑year OS rates were 85.2, 40.8, and 27.1%, and 76.9, 34.3, and 26.8% (P = 0.37), respectively. Using a multivariate Cox regression study, time (days) from the initiation of chemotherapy to TRT (TCT) ≤43 was associated with improved LRC (hazard radio, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.76; P = 0.005). Time (days) from the start of chemotherapy to the end of TRT (SER) ≤63 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.80; P = 0.003) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.29-0.63; P = 0.000) were favorably related to OS. Grade 2/3 acute radiation esophagitis was observed in 37.0 and 17.7% of patients in the hyperfractionated and hypofractionated arms, respectively (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Both hyperfractionated and hypofractionated TRT schedules achieved good LRC and OS for patients with limited-stage SCLC in this study. Keeping TCT ≤43 and SER ≤63 resulted in a better prognosis. The incidence of acute esophagitis was significantly higher in the hyperfractionated arm.

Cardiac toxicity of lung cancer radiotherapy

Radical radiotherapy of lung cancer with dose escalation has been associated with increased tumor control. However, these attempts to continually improve local control through dose escalation, have met mixed results culminating in the findings of the RTOG trial 0617, where the heart dose was associated with a worse overall survival, indicating a significant contribution to radiation-induced cardiac morbidity. It is, therefore, very likely that poorly understood cardiac toxicity may have offset any potential improvement in overall survival derived from dose escalation and may be an obstacle that limits disease control and survival of patients. The manifestations of cardiac toxicity are relatively common after high dose radiotherapy of advanced lung cancers and are independently associated with both heart dose and baseline cardiac risk. Toxicity following the treatment may occur earlier than previously thought and, therefore, heart doses should be minimized. In patients with lung cancer, who not only receive substantial heart dose, but are also older with more comorbidities, all cardiac events have the potential to be clinically significant and life-threatening. Sophisticated radiation treatment planning techniques, charged particle therapy, and modern imaging methods in radiotherapy planning, may lead to reduction of the heart dose, which could potentially improve the clinical outcomes in patients with lung cancer. Efforts should be made to minimize heart radiation exposure whenever possible even at doses lower than those generally recommended. Heart doses should be limited as much as possible. A heart dosimetry as a whole is important for patient outcomes, rather than emphasizing just one parameter.

Initial report on feasibility of PET/CT-based image-guided moderate hypofractionated thoracic irradiation in node-positive non-small cell lung Cancer patients with poor prognostic factors and strongly diminished lung function: a retrospective analysis

Background

To determine the feasibility of PET/CT-based image-guided moderate hypofractionated thoracic irradiation (Hypo-IGRT) in locally advanced node-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients with highly compromised pulmonary function.

Method

Eight highly-selected and closely monitored patients with highly diminished pulmonary function (FEV1 ≤ 1.0 L and/or DLCO-SB ≤ 40% and/or on long-term oxygen therapy) were treated with Hypo-IGRT. Planning was based on 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 4D-CT in the treatment position. Hypo-IGRT was delivered to a total dose of 45 Gy (ICRU) in 15 daily fractions under strict image-guidance. Vital capacity (VC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for CO (DLCO-SB) were analyzed prior to, 3 and 6 months after Hypo-IGRT.

Result

Eight patients with stage IIIA-C NSCLC (8th TNM Ed.) completed Hypo-IGRT. The median follow-up was 29.4 months. The median age was 64 years. Four, three and one patient(s) presented with COPD GOLD IV, III and II, respectively and 5 patients (63%) were on long-term oxygen therapy. The median PTV was 226.9 cc (range: 100.17–379.80 cc). Median PFS and OS were 19 and 34.3 months. The 6 months and 1-year OS rates were 100, 87.5%, respectively. The 6- and 12- months PFS rates were 87.5 and 52.5%. Three patients developed local failure. Median initial VC, FEV1 and DLCO-SB was 1.69 L/64.8% predicted (range: 1.36–2.66 L/33–80%), 1 L/39.4% predicted (range:0.78–1.26 L/28–60% predicted) and 33.3% (range: 13.3–54%) predicted, respectively. Median values for VC, FEV1, DLCO-SB 3 and 6 months after Hypo-IGRT were 2.05 L/56.35% predicted (range: 1.34–2.33 L/47–81.5%), 1.08 L/47.5% predicted (range: 0.74–1.60 L/30.8–59.59%), 38.55% (range: 24–68%) and 1.64 L/66% predicted (range: 1.41–2.79/35.5–75.5%), 1.0 L/47% predicted (range: 0.65–1.28 L/24.5–54.10%), 31% (range: 27–43%), respectively. Mean lung dose was 9.4 Gy (range: 5.3–11.6 Gy) and V20 for both lungs was 15% (range: 6–19%). Mean esophageal dose was 12.76 Gy (range: 2.1–26.7 Gy). There was no case of grade 2 or higher radiation pneumonitis. Four patients developed grade 2 radiation esophagitis.

Conclusion

Hypo-IGRT can be considered for individual and closely monitored patients with locally advanced node-positive NSCLC with highly compromised pulmonary function. No severe pulmonary toxicity and significant decline of pulmonary function parameters was observed in our cohort. Currently, this protocol is being assessed in an ongoing single-centre prospective study.

Current management of limited-stage SCLC and CONVERT trial impact: Results of the EORTC Lung Cancer Group survey

OBJECTIVES

The CONVERT trial showed that twice-daily (BD) concurrent chemoradiotherapy should continue to be considered the standard of care in localised LS-SCLC. A survey was conducted to assess the impact of the CONVERT trial in clinical practice and to identify any relevant research questions for future trials in this setting.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An EORTC Group online survey of LS-SCLC practice was distributed to the EORTC LCG and to members of several European thoracic oncology societies between April and December 2018.

RESULTS

198 responses were analysed. The majority of respondents (88%, n = 174) were aware of the CONVERT trial. Radiation oncologists comprised 56% of all respondents. Once-daily (OD) radiotherapy is still the most commonly used regimen, however the use of concurrent BD radiotherapy increased after the publication of CONVERT (n = 59/186, 32% prior to and n = 78/187, 42% after the publication, p = 0.053). The main reasons for not implementing BD after the CONVERT publication were logistical issues (n = 88, 44%), inconvenience for patients (n = 56, 28%), and the absence of a statistical survival difference between the two arms in CONVERT (n = 38, 19%). Brain MRI was used by 28% during staging but more than half (60%) of the respondents did not routinely image the brain during follow-up. The main research questions of interest in LS-SCLC were 1) integrating novel targeted therapies-immunotherapies (n = 160, 81%), 2) PCI (+/- hippocampal sparing) vs. MRI surveillance (n = 140, 71%) and, 3) biomarker driven trials (n = 92, 46%).

CONCLUSION

Once daily radiotherapy (60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions) remains the most prescribed radiotherapy fractionation, despite the findings suggested by the CONVERT trial.

Consolidative thoracic radiotherapy in stage IV small cell lung cancer: Selection of patients amongst European IASLC and ESTRO experts

BACKGROUND

The role of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in stage IV small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is not uniformly accepted.

METHODS

We obtained a list of 13 European medical oncologists from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) and 13 European radiation oncologists from the European Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ESTRO). The strategies in decision making for TRT in stage IV SCLC were collected. Decision trees were created representing these strategies. Frequencies of recommending TRT were analysed for various parameter combinations based on the objective consensus methodology.

RESULTS

The factors associated with the recommendation for TRT included fitness of the patient, limited extrathoracic tumour burden, initial bulky thoracic disease and response to chemotherapy. The highest consensus for TRT was in fit patients with limited extrathoracic tumour burden and initial bulky disease with either a complete extrathoracic response or partial thoracic response (92% recommend TRT). For these patients the recommendations were the same for medical and radiation oncologists. In the setting of partial response (intra- and extra-thoracically) without initial bulky thoracic disease radiation oncologists were more likely to recommend TRT than medical oncologists. For unfit patients or for patients with poor overall response to chemotherapy, the majority did not recommend TRT.

CONCLUSION

European radiation and medical oncologists specializing in lung cancer recommend TRT in selected patients with stage IV SCLC and restrict its use primarily to fit patients who responded to chemotherapy with limited extrathoracic tumour burden.

Rethinking pulmonary toxicity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the era of combining anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy with thoracic radiotherapy

The combination of programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 blockade and thoracic radiotherapy has become the new standard of care in the treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The information regarding the pulmonary safety of such therapy remains limited to mostly retrospective studies and case reports with a small portion of data from prospective clinical trials. By analyzing the underlying mechanisms of interactions between radiation and immunotherapy from preclinical data and summarizing safety data from relevant clinical studies with pulmonary toxicity, we believe that longer and rigorous follow-up is warranted, to determine if the combination of such modalities is appropriate for patients without risking undue toxicity.

A Phase II Study of Gefitinib With Concurrent Thoracic Radiotherapy in Patients With Unresectable, Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutations (WJOG6911L)

Locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is curable. Standard treatment is concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but its efficacy with cytotoxic agents seems to reach a plateau. Among patients with advanced NSCLC who have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor is the key drug. Thus, a similar strategy should be tested in patients with locally advanced NSCLC who have EGFR mutation. This single arm, phase II study aims to explore the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival rate at 2 years. The secondary endpoints are overall response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. A total of 27 patients will be enrolled in this trial.

Radiation Dose and Fractionation for Limited-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer: Survey of US Radiation Oncologists on Practice Patterns

BACKGROUND

Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) with concurrent chemotherapy is standard for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). However, the optimal dosing and fractionation remain unclear. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines have recommended either 45 Gy delivered twice daily (BID) or 60 to 70 Gy delivered once daily (QD). However, the current practice patterns among US radiation oncologists are unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We surveyed US radiation oncologists using an institutional review board-approved questionnaire. The questions covered demographic data, self-rated knowledge of key trials, and treatment recommendations.

RESULTS

We received 309 responses from radiation oncologists. Of the 309 radiation oncologists, 60% preferred TRT QD and 76% acknowledged QD to be more common in their practice. The respondents in academic settings were more likely to endorse BID treatment by both preference (P = .001) and actual practice (P = .009). The concordance between preferring QD and administering QD in practice was 100%. In contrast, 40% of respondents who preferred BID actually administered QD more often. Also, 15% of physicians would be unwilling to switch from QD to BID and 3% would be unwilling to switch from BID to QD, even on patient request. Most respondents (88%) recommended a dose of 45 Gy for BID treatment. For QD treatment, the division was greater, with 54% recommending 60 Gy, 30% recommending 63 to 66 Gy, and 10% recommending 70 Gy.

CONCLUSION

Substantial variation exists in how US radiation oncologists approach TRT dosing and fractionation for LS-SCLC. Three quarters of our respondents reported administering TRT QD most often. The most common doses were 60 Gy QD and 45 Gy BID. The results of the present survey have provided the most up-to-date information on US practice patterns for LS-SCLC.

Dose escalation and associated predictors of survival with consolidative thoracic radiotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC): A National Cancer Database (NCDB) propensity-matched analysis

PURPOSE

Randomized studies have demonstrated a survival benefit for consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in extensive stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC), however the radiation dose and optimal selection criteria are often debated.

METHODS

We analyzed 3280 stage IV SCLC treated with double-agent chemotherapy and TRT within the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) and evaluated the differences in selection patterns and survival outcomes for patients who received at least 45 Gy of TRT and those who received <45 Gy. Univariable and multivariable analyses identified characteristics predictive of overall survival. Propensity-adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios for survival were used to account for indication bias between the two dose arms.

RESULTS

There were 1621 patients in the <45 Gy group (most common 30 Gy) and 1659 patients in the 45 Gy or higher group (most common 45 Gy). White patients, T1-T3 lesions, an absence of brain/liver/bone metastases, and starting TRT after 12 weeks of chemotherapy were associated with the higher dose group. With multivariable analysis, TRT to at least 45 Gy was an independent predictor of improved survival (HR = 0.78, P < 0.001) along with female gender, age <65, lower comorbidity score, starting TRT 12 weeks after chemotherapy, and the absence of brain/liver/bone metastases (P < 0.01). Propensity adjusted regression model showed a persistent correlation between a higher dose and survival (HR = 0.74, P < 0.001). Survival at 1 and 2 years for the 45 Gy or higher arm was 58.1% and 25.2% compared to 43.8% and 15.1% for the <45 Gy arm (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the largest analysis of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy in ES-SCLC to date, dose escalation to at least 45 Gy was an independent predictor for increased survival. These findings may be validated in ongoing prospective studies.

Concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer with cisplatin, vinorelbine, and thoracic radiotherapy: a phase II study from the Galician Lung Cancer Group

PURPOSE

The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the activity and safety of the combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine with thoracic radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives included toxicity profile, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 48 NSCLC patients were enrolled (median age 60 years, 52% stage IIIA and 48% stage IIIB, 52% adenocarcinoma). Patients received three cycles of chemotherapy every 21 days [intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m² and intravenous vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on day 1 and oral vinorelbine on day 8 (60 mg/m²)] concurrent with radiotherapy (66 Gy, administered at 1.8 Gy per day, five consecutive days per week).

RESULTS

ORR was 79.2% (72.9% showing partial response and 6.3% showing complete response). With a median follow-up of 20.7 months, median PFS was 12 months and median OS was 36 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities were: neutropenia (14.5%), anaemia (6.2%), vomiting (2%), and oesophagitis (4.2%). No toxic deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

This combined regimen shows efficacy and a manageable safety profile. PFS and OS outcomes are encouraging and warrant further research.

Efficacy of thoracic radiotherapy in patients with stage IIIB-IV epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant lung adenocarcinomas who received and responded to tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment

PURPOSE

Large-scale, prospective, randomized studies of the efficacy of thoracic radiotherapy (RT) in patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IV epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung adenocarcinomas who received and responded to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment are not currently available. Therefore, we designed a propensity score-matched, nationwide, population-based, cohort study for estimating the effects of thoracic RT on patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IV EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinomas and categorized them into two groups according to treatment modality and compared their outcomes; groups 1 and 2 consisted of patients who received EGFR TKI treatment alone until tumor progression and those who received and responded to EGFR TKI treatment and subsequently received thoracic RT for lung tumors, respectively. The patients in groups 2 and 1 were matched at a ratio of 1:4.

RESULTS

The matching process yielded a final cohort of 1475 patients (1180 and 295 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively) who were eligible for further analysis. According to both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) derived for thoracic RT for lung tumor after EGFR TKI use and tumor response (group 2) compared with EGFR TKI treatment alone (group 1) was 0.72 (0.60-0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic RT might be associated with overall survival in patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IV EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas who received and responded to EGFR TKI treatment.

Quantitative assessment of radiation dose and fractionation effects on normal tissue by utilizing a novel lung fibrosis index model

Background

Normal lung tissue tolerance constitutes a limiting factor in delivering the required dose of radiotherapy to cure thoracic and chest wall malignancies. Radiation-induced lung fibrosis (RILF) is considered a critical determinant for late normal tissue complications. While RILF mouse models are frequently approached e.g., as a single high dose thoracic irradiation to investigate lung fibrosis and candidate modulators, a systematic radiobiological characterization of RILF mouse model is urgently needed to compare relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of particle irradiation with protons, helium-, carbon and oxygen ions now available at HIT. We aimed to study the dose-response relationship and fractionation effect of photon irradiation in development of pulmonary fibrosis in C57BL/6 mouse.

Methods

Lung fibrosis was evaluated 24 weeks after single and fractionated whole thoracic irradiation by quantitative assessment of lung alterations using CT. The fibrosis index (FI) was determined based on 3D-segmentation of the lungs considering the two key fibrosis parameters affected by ionizing radiation i.e., a dose/fractionation dependent reduction of the total lung volume and increase of the mean lung density.

Results

The effective dose required to induce 50% of the maximal possible fibrosis (ED₅₀) was 14.55 ± 0.34Gy and 27.7 ± 1.22Gy, for single and five- fractions irradiation, respectively. Applying a deterministic model an α/β = 4.49 ± 0.38 Gy for the late lung radiosensitivity was determined. Intriguingly, we found that a linear-quadratic model could be applied to in-vivo log transformed fibrosis (FI) vs. irradiation doses. The LQ model revealed an α/β for lung radiosensitivity of 4.4879 Gy for single fraction and 3.9474 for 5-fractions. Our FI based data were in good agreement with a meta-analysis of previous lung radiosensitivity data derived from different clinical endpoints and various mouse strains. The effect of fractionation on RILF development was further estimated by the biologically effective dose (BED) model with threshold BED (BED_Tr) = 30.33 Gy and BED_ED50 = 61.63 Gy, respectively.

Conclusion

The systematic radiobiological characterization of RILF in the C57BL/6 mouse reported in this study marks an important step towards precise estimation of dose-response for development of lung fibrosis. These radiobiological parameters combined with a large repertoire of genetically engineered C57BL/6 mouse models, build a solid foundation for further biologically individualized risk assessment of RILF and functional RBE prediction on novel of particle qualities.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-017-0912-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Moderate hypofractionated image-guided thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced node-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients with very limited lung function: a case report

Patients with locally advanced lung cancer and very limited pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] ≤ 1 L) have dismal prognosis and undergo palliative treatment or best supportive care. We describe two cases of locally advanced node-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with very limited lung function treated with induction chemotherapy and moderate hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (Hypo-IGRT). Hypo-IGRT was delivered to a total dose of 45 Gy to the primary tumor and involved lymph nodes. Planning was based on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/ CT) and four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT). Internal target volume (ITV) was defined as the overlap of gross tumor volume delineated on 10 phases of 4D-CT. ITV to planning target volume margin was 5 mm in all directions. Both patients showed good clinical and radiological response. No relevant toxicity was documented. Hypo-IGRT is feasible treatment option in locally advanced node-positive NSCLC patients with very limited lung function (FEV1 ≤ 1 L).

Assessment of pulmonary 18F-FDG-PET uptake and cytokine profiles in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and erlotinib

Purpose

To investigate effects of radiotherapy (RT) and erlotinib on pulmonary glucose uptake using 2-deoxy-2-(18F)fluoro-D-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) during and after treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to identify associations between serum cytokine levels and lung glucose uptake.

Material and methods

Twenty-seven patients with advanced NSCLC, receiving RT alone or concomitant RT and erlotinib therapy, were examined by ¹⁸F-FDG PET before, during, and after treatment. A total of 57 ¹⁸F-FDG PET scans were analyzed. Pulmonary ¹⁸F-FDG uptake and radiotherapy dose mapping were used to acquire dose-response curves for each patient, where subsequent linear regression gave a glucose uptake level in the un-irradiated parts of the lungs (SUV₀) and a response slope (ΔSUV). Serum cytokine levels at corresponding time points were assessed using a multiplex bioassay. Correlations between the most robust cytokines and lung ¹⁸F-FDG dose response parameters were further investigated.

Results

From the dose response analysis, SUV₀ at post-therapy was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than at mid- and pre-therapy (45% and 58%, respectively) for the group receiving RT + erlotinib. Also, SUV₀ at post-therapy was higher for patients receiving RT + erlotinib compared to RT alone (42%; P < 0.001). No differences in ΔSUV were seen with treatments or time. SUV₀ was positively associated (r = 0.47, P = 0.01) with serum levels of the chemokine C-C motif ligand 21 (CCL21) for patients receiving RT + erlotinib.

Conclusions

Concomitant RT and erlotinib causes an elevation in pulmonary ¹⁸F-FDG uptake post treatment compared to RT alone. Pulmonary glucose uptake is associated with an upregulation of a chemokine (CCL21) involved in inflammatory reactions.

Which patients with ES-SCLC are most likely to benefit from more aggressive radiotherapy: A secondary analysis of the Phase III CREST trial

INTRODUCTION

In ES-SCLC patients with residual intrathoracic disease after first-line chemotherapy, the addition of thoracic radiotherapy reduces the risk of intrathoracic recurrence, and improves 2-year survival. To identify patient subgroups for future trials investigating higher dose (extra)thoracic radiotherapy, we investigated the prognostic importance of number and sites of metastases in patients included in the CREST trial.

MATERIALS/ METHODS

Additional data on sites and numbers of metastases were collected from individual records of 260 patients from the top 9 recruiting centers in the randomized CREST trial (53% of 495 study patients), which compared thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) to no TRT in ES-SCLC patients after any response to chemotherapy. All patients received prophylactic cranial irradiation.

RESULTS

The clinical characteristics and outcomes of the 260 patients analyzed here did not differ significantly from that of the other 235 patients included in the CREST trial, except that fewer patients had a WHO=0 performance status (24% vs 45%), and a higher proportion had WHO=2 (15% vs 5%; p<0.0001). No distant metastases were recorded in 5%, 39% had metastases confined to one organ, 34% to two, and 22% to three or more organ sites. Metastases were present in the liver (47%), bone (40%), lung (28%), extrathoracic (non-supraclavicular) lymph nodes (19%), supraclavicular nodes (18%), adrenals (17%) and other sites (12%). The OS (p=0.02) and PFS (p=0.04) were significantly better in patients with 2 or fewer metastases, with OS significantly worse if liver (p=0.03) and/or bone metastases (p=0.04) were present.

DISCUSSION

This analysis of patients recruited from the top 9 accruing centers in the CREST trial suggests that future studies evaluating more intensive thoracic and extra-thoracic radiotherapy in ES-SCLC should focus on patients with fewer than 3 distant metastases.

Recent developments in radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a review by the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer (Spanish Radiation Oncology Society)

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 13% of all lung tumours. The standard treatment in patients with limited-stage disease is radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy. In extensive SCLC, the importance of consolidation thoracic radiotherapy in patients with a good treatment response has become increasingly recognized. In both limited and extensive disease, prophylactic cranial irradiation is recommended in patients who respond to treatment. New therapeutic approaches such as immunotherapy are being increasingly incorporated into the treatment of SCLC, although more slowly than in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Diverse radiation dose and fractionation schemes, administered in varying combinations with these new drugs, are being investigated. In the present study we review and update the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of SCLC. We also discuss the main clinical trials currently underway in order to identify future trends.

Quantification of coronary artery motion and internal risk volume from ECG gated radiotherapy planning scans

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy for carcinoma of breast and thoracic structures involves inadvertent radiation to heart and coronary arteries (CA). Coronary artery stenosis in high radiation dose segments has been documented. Cardiac and respiratory motion induced displacement of CA and internal risk volume (IRV) margin remains inadequately quantified.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty cases of carcinoma breast, lung and lung metastasis were enrolled in this study. ECG gated intravenous contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scans were performed in inspiratory breath hold (IBH) and expiratory breath hold (EBH). The images were segregated into inspiratory systole (IS), inspiratory diastole (ID), expiratory systole (ES) and expiratory diastole (ED) sets. Left anterior descending (LAD), limited segment of LAD close to chest wall (short LAD), right coronary artery (RCA), Left circumflex artery (LCX) and left ventricle (LV) were delineated in all four sets. Mean displacements in systole versus diastole and inspiration versus expiration were calculated in three co-ordinates [anterio-posterior (Z), left-right (X) and cranio-caudal (Y)].

RESULTS

Mean of displacement (mm) between systole and diastole (IS versus ID; and ES versus ED) in X, Y, Z co-ordinates were: LAD 3.0(±1.6), 2.8(±1.5), 3.6(±2.0); Short-LAD 3.0(±1.1), 0.8(±0.4), 2.4(±0.6); LV 2.4(±1.6), 1.7(±1), 5.0(±1.5); LCX 4.9(±1.6), 2.9(±1.3), 5.1(±1.9); RCA 6.6(±2.2), 3.6(±2.1), 5.9(±2.2). Mean displacement between inspiration and expiration (IS versus ES; and ID versus ED) in X, Y, Z axes were: LAD 3.3(±1.5), 8.0(±3.4), 3.8(±1.8); Short-LAD 2.7(±1), 12.2(±4.4), 3.3(±1.5); LV 2.9(±1.4), 9.8(±3.3), 4.7(±1.9); LCX 2.9(±.8), 9.7(±3.2), 6.2(±2.5); RCA 2.6(±1.3), 7.6(±2.5), 3.8(±1.7).

CONCLUSION

Radial (RM), cranio-caudal margin (CC) of 7mm, 4mm in breath-hold radiotherapy whereas RM, CC of 7mm, 13mm respectively in free breath radiotherapy will cover the range of motions of CA, LV and can be recommended as IRV for these structures.

Intrathoracic extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: assessment of the benefit of thoracic and brain radiotherapy using the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ESCLC) includes metastatic disease and locally advanced disease confined to the thorax that cannot be encompassed in a typical radiation portal. We assessed and then compared the benefits of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and/or brain radiotherapy (BRT) on overall survival (OS) between the intrathoracic (T-ESCLC) and metastatic (M-ESCLC) groups using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database.

METHODS

TRT and BRT data were available for 10150 patients treated from 1988-1997. The T-ESCLC group included 1774 patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and the proportional hazards model was used to estimate OS hazard ratios for prognostic factors including age, gender, race, tumor size, T/N stage, TRT, and BRT.

RESULTS

The 2-year OS for T-ESCLC was 7.8 % compared to 3 % in the M-ESCLC group (p < 0.001). In the T-ESCLC group, TRT and BRT were delivered to 750 and 102 patients, respectively. The 2-year OS was 13 % in the TRT group compared to 4.1 % in the no-TRT group (p ≤ 0.001) and 22.5 % in the BRT group compared to 7 % in the no-BRT group (p < 0.001). In the M-ESCLC group, TRT and BRT were delivered to 3093 and 1887 patients, respectively. The 2-year OS was 4.4 % in the TRT group compared to 2.8 % in the no-TRT group (p < 0.001) and 4.3 % in the BRT compared to 2.6 % in the no-BRT group (p < 0.001). Age, gender, TRT and BRT were significant OS prognostic factors in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that T-ESCLC is a disease entity distinct from M-ESCLC. Prospective studies to determine whether TRT should be recommended for the thoracic-only subgroup are warranted.

Concurrent Etoposide/Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy (EP) and Thoracic Radiotherapy after Two Cycles of EP for Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

s: Although the standard management of limited stage small cell lung cancer is concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT), the optimal timing of the TRT remains controversial. We investigated the feasibility of concurrent chemoradiation for the patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer after 2 cycles of combination chemotherapy with Etoposide/Cisplatin (EP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EP consisted of Etoposide 100 mg/m2 on day 1 to 3 and Cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1. Six cycles were given to the responders every 4 weeks. Total 55 Gy (1.8 Gy once-daily or 1.2 Gy twice-daily, 5 days per week) of TRT were given to the patients who showed at least a partial response after 2 cycles of EP. The other patients were treated by the physician's decision. The patients with complete remission were recommended to receive prophylactic cranial irradiation.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled. Thirty-five (70%) of them showed responses (2 complete remissions and 33 partial remissions) after 2 cycles of EP. Thirty-three of the responders were given TRT starting with the 3rd cycle of EP. The nonresponders were treated with salvage chemotherapy and TRT. After completion of treatment for 50 patients, the overall response rate was 86% (29 complete remissions, 14 partial remissions). One patient (2%) showed stable disease, and 6 (12%) showed a progressive disease. The median progression free survival was 326 days and the median survival time was 410 days. One-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year survival rates were 62%, 24%, 14%, 9% and 6%, respectively. As hematologic toxicities during chemoradiation, 35.1% with grade III/IV neutropenia and 18.9% with grade III/IV thrombocytopenia were noted. Grade II/III radiation pneumonitis and radiation esophagitis were noted in 5/1 and 13/1 patients (15.2%/ 3.0% and 39.4%/3.0%), respectively. One patient died of septicemia during chemoradiation.

CONCLUSION

The concurrent EP and TRT after 2 cycles of EP was feasible in limited stage small cell lung cancer. Further study is required for the indentification of optimum timing of TRT during combination chemotherapy.

The Role of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Small-Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

The standard therapy for limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for those who achieve complete remission (CR) or good partial response (PR) with initial therapy. On the other hand, the standard therapy for extensive disease (ED-SCLC) is chemotherapy only. After the two phase III study conducted by Slotman et al., PCI with/without thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is also recommended in the treatment of ED-SCLC. However, a Japanese phase III study failed to confirm the benefit of PCI for patients with ED-SCLC. All studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of PCI for preventing brain metastasis, but PCI seems to have a limited influence on OS. In the 2014 edition of the Guidelines for the Treatment of Lung Cancer from the Japan Lung Cancer Society (JLCS), use of PCI for patients with ED-SCLC has been changed from "recommended" to "not recommended". Appropriate selection of patients for PCI with/without TRT is very important. It is hoped that the characteristics of patients for whom PCI with/without TRT should be considered or avoided will be better defined in the future.

Thoracic Radiotherapy for Extensive Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016;17:239-244. [PMID: 26498503 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.09.007]

BACKGROUND

Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) has been evaluated as a means of improving overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline and Embase (inception to January 2015) was undertaken to identify studies of extensive stage SCLC patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy and randomized to receive TRT versus no TRT. Studies were screened by title (n = 2343) and then abstract (n = 72), with subsequent full-text review (n = 16). Effect estimates (hazard ratios [HR] and confidence intervals) were abstracted, with a random-effects model created to estimate treatment effects. Cochrane's Q and I(2) statistics were used to assess study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Two randomized studies were identified, including a total of 604 patients (302 TRT; 302 non-TRT). All patients received prophylactic cranial irradiation. The weighted median age was 62 years, and 56% were male. TRT was delivered as 30 Gy/10 fractions (n = 247) or 54 Gy twice daily/36 fractions (n = 55). Overall, the delivery of TRT was associated with improved overall survival (HR, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.96; P = .014) and progression-free survival (HR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.87, P < .001). For both end points, the studies were not found to be heterogeneous (P = .439 and P = .638 respectively, I(2) = 0). Bronchopulmonary toxicity (grade 3 or higher) was similar in both groups (≤ 2%). Esophageal toxicity (grade 3 or higher) was 6.6% in the TRT arm and 0% in the non-TRT arm (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review with meta-analysis of 2 randomized trials indicates that TRT improves overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with extensive stage SCLC, with a small incremental risk of esophageal toxicity.

[Tumor-bronchial actinomycosis simulating a recurrence of lung cancer 14 years after initial treatment: A case report]

A patient with a history of squamous cell carcinoma of the right upper lung lobe treated 14 years before by concomitant chemo-radiotherapy was referred on account of dyspnea. Bronchial endoscopy revealed complete obstruction of the right main bronchus highly suggestive of a tumor recurrence. However, biopsy samples only showed inflammatory and necrotic tissue with no evidence of malignancy. Despite complete tissue resection by rigid bronchoscopy, a rapid and complete recurrence occurred requiring the placement of a Y-shaped bronchial prosthesis. Repeat histological, bacteriological and mycological analyses were negative. The patient was soon readmitted to hospital for a lung infection due to recurrence of obstruction inside and around the prosthesis. Bacterial examination of biopsy samples identified Actinomyces meyeri. Appropriate antibiotic therapy led to a complete regression of the bronchial obstruction. Unfortunately, the patient died a few months later due to massive hemoptysis after the removal of the prosthesis. Autopsy examination showed a fistula between the right main bronchus and pulmonary artery, with no evidence of neoplastic recurrence nor the persistence of lesions associated with actinomycosis.

Fatal bilateral pneumonitis after locoregional thoracic chemoradiation in a transplanted patient under immunosuppressive therapy

BACKGROUND

After thoracic radiotherapy a pneumonitis may occur, mostly confined to the irradiated volume of the lung. In general, it resolves spontaneously without long-term effects.

CASE REPORT

A 68-year-old man was diagnosed with a stage IIIA adenocarcinoma of the lung and was treated with sequential chemoradiation. He had a heart and kidney transplant for which an immunosuppressant was taken. During the fourth week of radiotherapy, he developed a bilateral interstitial pneumonia. Despite antibiotics and steroids, the patient died twelve days after the onset of complaints due to respiratory failure. Autopsy showed in all pulmonary lobes extensive diffuse alveolar damage, probably leading to respiratory insufficiency and death. Literature and Conclusion: Bilateral pneumonitis after radiotherapy is thought to be an immunologically-mediated response, which usually resolves without long-term effects. Since in radiation pneumonitis an increase in T-cells is described, the suppression of these cells by an immunosuppressant might have exaggerated the pulmonary toxicity.