Comparison of efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to an increase in randomized controlled trials exploring various first-line combination treatment regimens. With the introduction of new PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, there are now more clinical options available. For the first time, the AK105 monoclonal antibody Penpulimab, developed in China, was included. The AK105-302 Phase III trial studied the efficacy and safety of Penpulimab combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC. To determine the optimal treatment options, we conducted an updated network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of these regimens.

METHODS

The system retrieves data from Chinese and English electronic databases, Clinical Trials, and the gov Clinical Trial Registration website up to September 6, 2023. The study indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination regimens, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), all-grade adverse events, and above-grade III adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) level, histological type, ECOG score, sex, and smoking history.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTS were included, with a total of ten thousand eight hundred patients. Penpulimab plus chemotherapy (Pen + CT) provided the best OS (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.81) for PD-L1 patients with non-selective advanced NSCLC. Except Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (Niv + Ipi), other PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapies significantly extended PFS compared with CT, and Nivolumab plus Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy (Niv + Bev + CT) (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.74) provided the best PFS benefit and was comparable to Pen + CT (HR = 1.0) for PFS prolongation. For ORR, except Niv + Ipi, all the other regimens significantly improved ORR compared with CT. In terms of safety, except Tor + CT, the incidence of any-grade AEs or grade ≥ 3 adverse events may be higher than those of chemotherapy. The subgroup analysis revealed that for patients with PD-L1 levels below 1%, treatment with Tor + CT resulted in the best progression-free survival (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.86). For patients with PD-L1 levels of 1% or higher, Sintilimab plus chemotherapy (Sin + CT) (HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-0.99) and Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (Cam + CT) (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.28-0.64) were associated with the best overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively. For patients with SqNSCLC, combined immunotherapy may provide greater survival benefits. For patients with Non-sqNSCLC, Niv + Bev + CT and Tor + CT were associated with optimal PFS and OS, respectively. Cam + CT provided the best PFS in male patients with a history of smoking and an ECOG score of 0. In both female and non-smoking patient subgroups, Pem + CT was associated with the best PFS and OS benefits.

CONCLUSION

For patients with advanced non-selective PD-L1 NSCLC, two effective regimens are Pen + CT and Niv + Bev + CT, which rank first in OS and PFS among all patients. Cam + CT and Tor + CT have advantages for OS in patients with SqNSCLC and Non-sqNSCLC, respectively. Niv + Ipi + CT provided the best OS benefit for patients with an ECOG score of 0, while Pem + CT may be the most effective treatment for patients with an ECOG score of 1. Pem + CT has a better effect on female patients and non-smokers. Sin + CT was found to be the most effective treatment for male patients and the smoking subgroup, while Cam + CT was found to be the most effective for PFS. In addition, Tor + CT was associated with the best PFS for patients with negative PD-L1 expression. Pem + CT was found to significantly improve both PFS and OS compared to CT alone. For patients with positive PD-L1 expression, Sin + CT and Cam + CT were found to be optimal for OS and PFS, respectively. It is important to note that, with the exception of Tor + CT, the toxicity of the other combinations was higher than that of CT alone.

Real-world patient characteristics and treatment patterns in US patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) controlled clinical trials do not always reflect real-world heterogeneous patient populations. We designed a study to describe the real-world patient characteristics and treatment patterns of first-line treatment in patients in the US with NSCLC.

METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective cohort study based on electronic medical records of US adults with locally advanced or metastatic disease in the ConcertAI Patient360 NSCLC database who initiated first-line treatment with anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) therapy between July 2016 and December 2020. The analysis used patient attributes, clinical characteristics, and treatments from each patient's medical records.

RESULTS

A total of 2175 patients were eligible for analysis. The median age was 68 years, and 26.2% of the patients were ≥75 years old. At treatment initiation, 96.4% and 3.6% of the patients had Stage 4 and Stage 3 (B or C) NSCLC, respectively. The most common histology type was nonsquamous adenocarcinoma (66.4%), and 19.8% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2. Immunosuppressive medications were being used by 17.7% of patients, and 11.0% were immunocompromised. Almost all patients had metastases: 64.6% had 1, 23.2% had 2, and 8.0% had ≥3 metastatic sites. Brain metastases were present in 22.9% of patients. Treatment evolution was observed with first-line standard of care shifting from single-agent immunotherapy in 2016 (90.2%) to combination immunotherapy and chemotherapy in 2020 (60.2%).

CONCLUSION

Between 2016 and 2020, the first-line treatment paradigm for advanced NSCLC in the US shifted from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy to combination chemoimmunotherapy, with increasing biomarker testing. Further research in heterogeneous patient populations to characterize treatment strategies is warranted.

A combined approach of structure-based virtual screening and NMR to interrupt the PD-1/PD-L1 axis: Biphenyl-benzimidazole containing compounds as novel PD-L1 inhibitors

Immunotherapy has emerged as a game-changing approach for cancer treatment. Although monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis have entered the market revolutionizing the treatment landscape of many cancer types, small molecules, although presenting several advantages including the possibility of oral administration and/or reduced costs, struggled to enter in clinical trials, suffering of water insolubility and/or inadequate potency compared with mAbs. Thus, the search for novel scaffolds for both the design of effective small molecules and possible synergistic strategies is an ongoing field of interest. In an attempt to find novel chemotypes, a virtual screening approach was employed, resulting in the identification of new chemical entities with a certain binding capability, the most versatile of which was the benzimidazole-containing compound 10. Through rational design, a small library of its derivatives was synthesized and evaluated. The homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) assay revealed that compound 17 shows the most potent inhibitory activity (IC50 ) in the submicromolar range and notably, differently from the major part of PD-L1 inhibitors, exhibits satisfactory water solubility properties. These findings highlight the potential of benzimidazole-based compounds as novel promising candidates for PD-L1 inhibition.

Prognostic implications of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemoimmunotherapy: A multicenter, real-world study

BACKGROUND

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are closely related to the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, but their effect on extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remains uncertain.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in ES-SCLC patients treated with first-line atezolizumab or durvalumab and platinum-etoposide. Clinical data from three hospitals were analyzed. Significant risk factors for survival were identified using descriptive statistics and Cox regression. Homogeneity was assessed using t-tests or nonparametric tests. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed an association between high NLR level and median PFS and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 300 ES-SCLC patients were included in the study. Cox regression analysis revealed that an elevated NLR level after the second treatment cycle (defined as NLRT2) was an independent prognostic factor for survival. Stratifying patients based on median NLRT2 showed significant differences in both PFS (HR: 1.863, 95% CI: 1.62-2.12, p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 2.581, 95% CI: 2.19-3.04, p < 0.001) between NLR ≥ 1.75 and NLR < 1.75 groups. mPFS and mOS were 8.2 versus 6.1 months and 13.7 versus 9.5 months, respectively. NLR was also associated with treatment efficacy and occurrence of irAEs. Further stratification based on NLR and irAEs showed that in the NLR < 1.75 group, patients with irAEs had prolonged mPFS and mOS. In the NLR ≥ 1.75 group, only mPFS showed a significant difference between patients with and without irAEs.

CONCLUSION

NLRT2 and irAEs can predict the prognosis of ES-SCLC patients with first-line ES-SCLC receiving PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy.

Achilles' Heel of currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors: immune related adverse events

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the cancer treatment landscape by opening up novel avenues for intervention. As the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has exponentially increased, so have immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The mechanism of irAEs may involve the direct damage caused by monoclonal antibodies and a sequence of immune responses triggered by T cell activation. Common side effects include dermatologic toxicity, endocrine toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, and hepatic toxicity. While relatively rare, neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and pulmonary toxicity can be fatal. These toxicities pose a clinical dilemma regarding treatment discontinuation since they can result in severe complications and necessitate frequent hospitalization. Vigilant monitoring of irAEs is vital in clinical practice, and the principal therapeutic strategy entails the administration of oral or intravenous glucocorticoids (GSCs). It may be necessary to temporarily or permanently discontinue the use of ICIs in severe cases. Given that irAEs can impact multiple organs and require diverse treatment approaches, the involvement of a multidisciplinary team of experts is imperative. This review aims to comprehensively examine the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, incidence, and treatment options for various irAEs.

Diagnosing and Managing Uveitis Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review

This review aims to provide an understanding of the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of uveitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In the wake of these molecules being increasingly employed as a treatment against different cancers, cases of uveitis post-ICI therapy have also been increasingly reported in the literature, warranting an extensive exploration of the clinical presentations, risk factors, and pathophysiological mechanisms of ICI-induced uveitis. This review further provides an understanding of the association between ICIs and uveitis, and assesses the efficacy of current diagnostic tools, underscoring the need for advanced techniques to enable early detection and accurate assessment. Further, it investigates the therapeutic strategies for ICI-related uveitis, weighing the benefits and limitations of existing treatment regimens, and discussing current challenges and emerging therapies in the context of their potential efficacy and side effects. Through an overview of the short-term and long-term outcomes, this article suggests recommendations and emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration between ophthalmologists and oncologists. Finally, the review highlights promising avenues for future research and development in the field, potentially informing transformative approaches in the ocular assessment of patients under immunotherapy and the management of uveitis following ICI therapy.

Effectiveness and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Studies in recent years have shown that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors may have better effectiveness in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. The effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is thought to be related to mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) classification in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients classified as dMMR and pMMR. Methods: Medical databases were searched to identify relevant publications up to 30 November 2022. The primary outcome was comparison of objective response rate (ORR) in patients with dMMR and pMMR following treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors; secondary outcomes were single-group ORR in patients with dMMR and in patients with pMMR, respectively. Results: Eleven studies were eligible for analysis and patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with molecular classification of dMMR had a higher total ORR than those with pMMR [odds ratio (OR), 7.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.22-18.38; p < 0.01], with low evidence of between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). The total ORR of patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with molecular type dMMR was 51.9% (95% CI, 33.6%-69.9%). The overall ORR of patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with molecular type pMMR was 16.1% (95% CI, 5.5%-30.3%). Conclusion: In our including studies, the patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with molecular types of dMMR and pMMR, following treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, the total ORR of patients with dMMR was higher than that of patients with pMMR. Since the current number of studies is not very large, it is possible that more studies will be published in the future and more precise results will be discussed further.

Clinical management of stage III non-small cell lung cancer in India: An expert consensus statement

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is considered the most common type of lung cancer (>80% of all lung cancers); patients are often diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease. The management of NSCLC is considered challenging owing to variations in size, an extension of the tumors, involvement patterns, and classification. Although adequate literature and guidelines are available on the management of NSCLC in several countries, an Indian perspective on stage III NSCLC management is lacking. We used the modified Delphi approach to form consensus statements. A thorough literature search was done. The authors then convened and deliberated over published literature, available guidelines, and clinical judgment. Recommendation statements were formed for different clinical scenarios. These statements were sent as a form of survey to other oncologists, and their responses were recorded and mentioned. Evidence-based statements were formed for diagnosing and managing stage III NSCLC. These recommendation statements cover various aspects-surgical, radiation, and medical treatment in various clinical scenarios including adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and consolidation therapies.

PPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors has emerged as a first-line therapeutic strategy for advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which can stimulate T-cell activation, thereby preventing tumor avoidance of immunologic surveillance, whereas, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can play an important role in regulating immune function. This study assessed whether the concomitantly use of PPIs affected outcomes of immunotherapy in advanced SCLC.

METHODS

Data from advanced SCLC patients who firstly treated with PD-L1 inhibitors between July 2018 and February 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. The impact of concomitant medications (especially PPIs) on objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 208 patients, 101 received immunotherapy concomitant PPIs. The median PFS of patients receiving PPIs (6.6 months) were significantly shorter than those without PPIs (10.6 months), and so was OS. There was associated with a 74.9% increased risk of progression and 58.3% increased risk of death. Both first-line and post-first-line immunotherapy, patients treated PPIs had poorer PFS.

CONCLUSION

PPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors.

Histiocytic Sarcoma Treated with Pembrolizumab: A Case Report and Literature Review

Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is a rare hematologic malignancy that has historically been treated with lymphoma-based regimens with a median survival of 6 months. We describe a case of a 51-year-old woman who presented with acute back pain and cord compression. She was diagnosed with HS with diffuse skeletal lesions and high expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). She was subsequently treated with chemotherapy plus off-label use of pembrolizumab followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Ultimately, the patient died in the setting of progression of disease 17 months after her stem cell transplantation and 26 months after her diagnosis. This article also presents a literature review of cases of HS treated with programmed death ligand inhibition.

Real-world outcomes of PD-L1 inhibitors combined with thoracic radiotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The CREST study showed that the addition of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) could improve the survival rate in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but whether TRT can bring survival benefit in the era of immunotherapy remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of adding TRT to the combination of PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy.

METHODS

The patients who received durvalumab or atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC from January 2019 to December 2021 were enrolled. They were divided into two groups, based on whether they received TRT or not. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio was performed. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients with ES-SCLC were enrolled, of whom 70 (33.2%) patients received standard therapy plus TRT as first-line treatment, and 141 (66.8%) patients in the control group received PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy. After PSM, a total of 57 pairs of patients were enrolled in the analysis. In all patients, the median PFS (mPFS) in the TRT and non-TRT group was 9.5 and 7.2 months, respectively, with HR = 0.59 (95%CI 0.39-0.88, p = 0.009). The median OS (mOS) in the TRT group was also significantly longer than that in the non-TRT group (24.1 months vs. 18.5 months, HR = 0.53, 95%CI 0.31-0.89, p = 0.016). Multivariable analysis showed that baseline liver metastasis and the number of metastases ≥ 3 were independent prognostic factors for OS. Addition of TRT increased the incidence of treatment-related pneumonia (p = 0.018), most of which were grade 1-2.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of TRT to durvalumab or atezolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves survival in ES-SCLC. Although it may leads to increased incidence of treatment-related pneumonia, a majority of the cases can be relieved after symptomatic treatment.

Radiomics combined with transcriptomics to predict response to immunotherapy from patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC

Introduction

In this study, we aim to build radiomics and multiomics models based on transcriptomics and radiomics to predict the response from patients treated with the PD-L1 inhibitor.

Materials and methods

One hundred and ninety-five patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were included. For all patients, 342 radiomic features were extracted from pretreatment computed tomography scans. The training set was built with 110 patients treated at the Léon Bérard Cancer Center. An independent validation cohort was built with the 85 patients treated in Dijon. The two sets were dichotomized into two classes, patients with disease control and those considered non-responders, in order to predict the disease control at 3 months. Various models were trained with different feature selection methods, and different classifiers were evaluated to build the models. In a second exploratory step, we used transcriptomics to enrich the database and develop a multiomic signature of response to immunotherapy in a 54-patient subgroup. Finally, we considered the HOT/COLD status. We first trained a radiomic model to predict the HOT/COLD status and then prototyped a hybrid model integrating radiomics and the HOT/COLD status to predict the response to immunotherapy.

Results

Radiomic signature for 3 months' progression-free survival (PFS) classification: The most predictive model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.94 on the training set and 0.65 on the external validation set. This model was obtained with the t-test selection method and with a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Multiomic signature for PFS classification: The most predictive model had an AUROC of 0.95 on the training set and 0.99 on the validation set. Radiomic model to predict the HOT/COLD status: the most predictive model had an AUROC of 0.93 on the training set and 0.86 on the validation set. HOT/COLD radiomic hybrid model for PFS classification: the most predictive model had an AUROC of 0.93 on the training set and 0.90 on the validation set.

Conclusion

In conclusion, radiomics could be used to predict the response to immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. The use of transcriptomics or the HOT/COLD status, together with radiomics, may improve the working of the prediction models.

Clinical impact of first-line PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients: A real-world multicenter propensity score-matched study

OBJECTIVES

Our research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with etoposide and platinum (EP) for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and identify prognostic factors, as real-world outcomes and the inconsistency of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are uncertain.

METHODS

We selected ES-SCLC patients in three centers and conducted a propensity score-matched analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were conducted to compare the survival outcomes. We also performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to investigate predictors.

RESULTS

Among 236 patients included, 83 pairs of cases were matched. The EP plus ICIs cohort had a longer median overall survival (OS) (17.3 months) than the EP cohort (13.4 months) (hazard ratio [HR],  0.61 [0.45, 0.83]; p = 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was also longer in the EP plus ICIs cohort (8.3 months) than in the EP cohort (5.9 months) (HR,   0.44 [0.32, 0.60]; p < 0.001). The EP plus ICIs group had a higher objective response rate (ORR) (EP: 62.3%, EP + ICIs: 84.3%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis presented that liver metastases (HR, 2.08; p = 0.018) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) (HR, 0.54; p = 0.049) were independent prognostic factors for OS, and performance status (PS) (HR, 2.11; p = 0.015), liver metastases (HR, 2.64; p = 0.002), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR, 0.45; p = 0.028) were for PFS in patients with chemo-immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world data demonstrated that ICIs with chemotherapy as the first-line setting for ES-SCLC are effective and safe. PS, liver metastases, and inflammatory markers could serve as valuable risk factors.

Combining PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy is a good strategy for the treatment of extensive small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis of clinical studies

Objectives

To provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Clinicaltrials and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to extract RCTs concerning the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of ES-SCLC from the time of database inception to October 31, 2022. The literature was independently selected, information was extracted and the risk of bias of the RCTs was evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stata14.0 was used for the meta-analysis.

Results

Six studies involving 2,600 patients were included in the analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improved the OS (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.66-0.80; P<0.0001), prolonged PFS (HR: 0.66,95% CI: 0.55-0.79; P<0.0001) and did not increase overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97-1.09; P=0.330) in ES-SCLC patients compared with chemotherapy alone. The subgroup analysis found that patients with negative PD-L1 expression (< 1%) benefited in OS, whereas patients with positive PD-L1 expression (≥1%) had no statistically significant difference in OS. There was a statistically significant difference in PFS between PD-L1-negative (< 1%) and PD-L1-positive (≥1%) patients. The addition of a PD-1 inhibitor or PD-L1 inhibitor to the chemotherapy regimen can improve OS and prolong PFS in patients with ES-SCLC.

Conclusions

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combination chemotherapy significantly improves PFS and OS in ES-SCLC patients without increasing the overall incidence of TRAEs.

Adverse Events of PD-1 or PD-L1 Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: This study aimed to develop a comprehensive understanding of the treatment-related adverse events when using PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). (2) Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of Phase II/III randomized clinical trials. Studies were searched for using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 1 March 1980 till 30 June 2022. Data on adverse events were mainly extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov and published articles. A generalized linear mixed model with the logit transformation was employed to obtain the overall incidence of adverse events across all studies. For serious adverse events with low incidences, the Peto method was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) in the PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors groups compared to the control groups. (3) Results: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, including a total of 2941 TNBC patients treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (including atezolizumab, pembrolizumab and durvalumab) and 2339 patients in the control groups. Chemotherapy alone was the control group in all studies. The average incidences of all serious immune-related adverse events of interest (hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, pneumonitis, pruritus, rash) were less than 1%, except for adrenal insufficiency (1.70%, 95%CI: 0.50-5.61%) in the PD-1 or PD-L1 groups. PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors significantly increased the risk of serious pneumonitis (OR = 2.52, 95%CI: 1.02-6.26), hypothyroidism (OR = 5.92, 95%CI: 1.22-28.86), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation (OR = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.12-2.45), and adrenal insufficiency (OR = 18.81, 95%CI: 3.42-103.40). For non-serious adverse events, the patients treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors had higher risk of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (OR =1.26, 95%CI: 1.02-1.57), hypothyroidism (OR = 3.63, 95%CI: 2.92-4.51), pruritus (OR = 1.84, 95%CI: 1.30-2.59), rash (OR = 1.29, 95%CI: 1.08-1.55), and fever (OR = 1.77, 95%CI: 1.13-2.77), compared with chemotherapy alone. (4) Conclusions: The incidence of serious immune-related adverse events in PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors groups is low but significantly higher than in chemotherapy groups. When using PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors for the treatment of TNBC, serious pneumonitis, hypothyroidism, ALT elevation, and adrenal insufficiency should be considered. Non-serious adverse events, such as AST elevation, rash, and fever, should also be taken into consideration.

Renal Toxicities in Cancer Patients Receiving Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis

Aim: We performed a meta-analysis of the available clinical trials of immune-checkpoint inhibitors to assess risk differences and relative risks of renal toxicity. Methods: 17 randomized phase III studies were selected, including 10,252 patients. Results: The administration of immune-checkpoint inhibitors resulted in an overall low-grade, high-grade and all-grade renal toxicity Risk Difference of: 0.746% (95% CI 0.629% to 1.15%, p < 0.001—random), 0.61% (95% CI, 0.292−0.929%, p < 0.001—fixed) and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.601−1.85%—random), respectively. The pooled Relative Risk of low-grade, high-grade and all-grade renal toxicity was: 2.185 (95% CI 1.515−3.152—fixed), 2.610 (95% CI, 1.409−4.833, p = 0.002—fixed) and 2.473 (95% CI, 1.782−3.431, p < 0.001—fixed), respectively. An increased risk of renal toxicity was evident in some subgroups more than others. Conclusion: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors are associated with an increased risk of renal toxicity.

Real-life safety of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in older patients with cancer: An observational study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the real-world safety profile of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors between younger and older patients.

METHODS

All patients receiving pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab or durvalumab between September 2016 and September 2019 at Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands were included in this retrospective study. Immune-related adverse drug reactions (irADRs) were manually retrieved from the electronic patient files. The cumulative incidence of irADRs were compared between younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients using a Pearsons Chi-square test.

RESULTS

We identified 217 patients who were treated with at least one dose of PD-(L)1 inhibitor. 58% were 65 years or older at the start of immunotherapy. 183 patients (84.3%) received monotherapy PD-(L)1 inhibitors and 34 (15.7%) received chemo-immunotherapy. A total of 278 irADRs were registered. Cutaneous irADRs (53.9%), thyroid gland disorders (20.3%), and non-infectious diarrhoea/colitis (17.5%) were the most frequently reported irADRs. The majority of the irADRs were mild to moderate and no fatal irADRs were observed. 61 (21.9%) of the irADRs needed systemic treatment, of which 19 (6.8%) required treatment with corticosteroids. 18 irADRs (6.5%) were severe and resulted in hospitalisation. The cumulative incidence of cutaneous irADRs was different between the age groups: 45.7% of the patients <65 years and in 60.0% of the patients ≥65 years (p = 0.036). No statistical difference was found in the cumulative incidence of other irADRs between the two age groups.

CONCLUSION

Advanced age is not associated with immune-related adverse drug reactions of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors.

Combination Strategies Involving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Tyrosine Kinase or BRAF Inhibitors in Aggressive Thyroid Cancer

Thyroid cancer is the most common (~90%) type of endocrine-system tumor, accounting for 70% of the deaths from endocrine cancers. In the last years, the high-throughput genomics has been able to identify pathways/molecular targets involved in survival and tumor progression. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy individually have many limitations. Regarding the first one, although it greatly reduces the size of the cancer, clinical responses are generally transient and often lead to cancer relapse after initial treatment. For the second one, although it induces longer-lasting responses in cancer patients than targeted therapy, its response rate is lower. The individual limitations of these two different types of therapies can be overcome by combining them. Here, we discuss MAPK pathway inhibitors, i.e., BRAF and MEK inhibitors, combined with checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4. Several mutations make tumors resistant to treatments. Therefore, more studies are needed to investigate the patient's individual tumor mutation burden in order to overcome the problem of resistance to therapy and to develop new combination therapies.

Indirect comparison of sintilimab and other PD-L1 inhibitors for first-line treatment of non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer

Objective: To evaluate sintilimab compared with other PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Methods: A frequentist meta-analysis was used to compare outcomes, including progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, time to response and safety profile. Results: The sintilimab combination arm had progression-free survival comparable to that of the pembrolizumab combination arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.71, 1.41), the atezolizumab combination arm (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.59, 1.10), the tislelizumab combination arm (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.48, 1.16), the camrelizumab combination arm (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.54, 1.20) and the nivolumab combination arm (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.51, 1.02). Any grade or grade ≥3 adverse event was comparable between PD-L1 inhibitors. Conclusion: Sintilimab showed a comparable efficacy and safety profile when compared with other PD-L1 inhibitors combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Case Report: First Case of Consolidation Immunotherapy After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastatic Sarcomatoid Carcinoma

Sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) is a rare lung cancer subtype with poor prognosis and lack of effective treatment regimens. Studies concerning SC indicated common programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) overexpression and higher tumor mutational burden, leading to potential benefits from immunotherapy. The present case is the first report employing PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab following definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in a patient with mediastinal lymph node metastatic SC, which was considered as a high probability of pulmonary origin but unclear primary lesion. After the 19-month follow-up, there was neither local recurrence nor distant metastasis. The patient was in a good condition, with the thoracic lesion controlled at Partial response-Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (PR-RECIST). Except for grade 2 esophagitis, none of the other adverse events was observed. Our first attempt to adopt the consolidation immunotherapy after cCRT in unresectable locally advanced mediastinal SC exhibited improved local control, manageable safety, and potential survival benefits, representing a novel and promising therapeutic option for SC and encouraging further research exploration of this regimen in the future.

PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Monotherapy for the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)/Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for endometrial cancer remain controversial, and guidelines are inconsistent on which are preferred therapies for advanced disease, or who develop metastases and recurrence. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in endometrial cancer on a more complete database by adding multiple randomized trials.

METHODS

A systematic and comprehensive search was carried out in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy.

RESULTS

The ORR of PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors was 29%, and subgroup analysis showed that the pooled ORR of the proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) group was 4% and which was 45% of the deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) group. The DCR of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was 48%, through subgroup analysis, we found that the DCR of the pMMR group was 21% and which was 58% of the dMMR group. The proportion of patients occurring overall adverse events was 65% and grade three or higher adverse events was 14%. The proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) group and the deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) group showed different results.

CONCLUSION

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had shown little success in the pMMR population and better efficacy in the dMMR population.

Association between PD-L1 inhibitor, tumor site and adverse events of potential immune etiology within the US FDA adverse event reporting system

Objective: To analyze tumor- and treatment-related factors that might impact the development of certain adverse events (AEs) of potential immune etiology among patients receiving PD-L1 inhibitors. Methods: The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was accessed, and AE reports related to the use of PD-L1 inhibitors were reviewed. Associations between treatment, tumor type and occurrence of AEs of special interest were analyzed through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 80,304 AE reports were included in the current analysis. Diagnosis with lung cancer was associated with a higher probability of pneumonitis; diagnosis with melanoma was associated with a higher probability of hepatitis, hypophysitis/hypopituitarism and uveitis; and diagnosis with genitourinary cancers was associated with a higher probability of nephritis, adrenal insufficiency and myocarditis. Conclusion:  Within this cohort limited to AEs reported to the FAERS, there is an association between different AEs of special interest, agent(s) used and tumor(s) treated.

Nivolumab, a Double-Edged Sword: A Case Report of Nivolumab-Induced Myasthenia Gravis

Nivolumab is a checkpoint inhibitor approved to treat various solid organs malignancies. Although checkpoint inhibitors are very efficacious, these medications are also associated with a variety of side effects that could be life-threatening. We present a case of nivolumab-induced myasthenia gravis in a patient with stage IV esophageal cancer, who was found to have generalized weakness, blurry vision, diplopia, and later developed acute hypoxic respiratory failure with subsequent intubation. The patient was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis, and later started on pyridostigmine and high-dose steroids with minimal improvement. Goals of care were discussed with the patient and family, and the decision was made to discharge the patient home with hospice care. Nivolumab-induced myasthenia gravis is very aggressive with a poor prognosis if not appropriately managed in time. Hence we strongly recommend a multidisciplinary approach, including neurologists, to monitor patients on nivolumab therapy to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with it.

PD-L1 Inhibitors as Monotherapy for the First-Line Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in PD-L1 Positive Patients: A Safety Data Network Meta-Analysis

This network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluates the safety of first-line programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor monotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients compared to platinum-based chemotherapy. We also compared the risk of adverse events (AEs) according to programmed cell death-1 receptor (PD-1) or PD-L1 inhibitors therapy. To that end, we conducted a series of metanalyses (MAs) using data from six phase III clinical trials, including 4053 patients. Our results show a reduced risk of any grade treatment-related AEs (risk ratio (RR) = 0.722 95% CI: 0.667–0.783, p = 0.002), and grade 3–5 AEs (RR = 0.406 95% CI: 0.340–0.485, p = 0.023) in immunotherapy as compared to chemotherapy. In contrast, a higher risk of immune-related AEs (irAEs) was estimated for immunotherapy versus chemotherapy. The subgroup MAs comparing PD-L1 to PD-1 inhibitors, determined a lower risk of AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in the anti-PD-L1 subgroup (RR = 0.47 95% CI: 0.29–0.75, p = 0.001); however, this statistically significant difference between anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1 subgroups was not reached for other safety outcomes analyzed. In conclusion, our findings show that PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy improves safety outcomes in the 1L treatment of advanced NSCLC patients as compared to chemotherapy except for irAEs.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in GBM

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to summarize recent updates regarding immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in GBM patients including updates in brain immunology, clinical trials, mechanisms of resistance, and biomarkers of response.

METHODS

PubMed was searched to identify recent relevant articles on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy as it pertains to GBM. Clinicaltrials.gov was also searched to identify relevant clinical trials.

RESULTS

The reported randomized phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (alone or in combination with standard therapy) have not demonstrated a survival benefit to date in either newly diagnosed or recurrent GBM. A small randomized surgical study of neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab suggested an increase in PFS and OS compared to adjuvant pembrolizumab only; further studies are needed to validate this finding.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the positive impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in many cancers, only a small subset of GBM patients respond to these agents. Further research is needed to identify biomarkers of response and therapies to rationally combine with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

PD-L1 (SP142) testing is concordant between Benchmark Ultra and Bond-III stainers

Background

Atezolizumab is an inhibitor of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), used to treat advanced or metastatic bladder cancer, and in trials for non-invasive disease. In order to be eligible for treatment, patients require a PD-L1 immune cell score ≥ 5%, using the Ventana SP142 PD-L1 assay. Many laboratories do not have access to the required Ventana Benchmark Ultra stainer, and it is unclear if the assay performs similarly on other stainers. In this study, we compare SP142 assay results between Ventana Benchmark Ultra and Leica Bond-III stainers.

Methods

Serial sections of 90 samples of transurethral bladder resections (comprising 51 pTaHG, 8 pTis, 18 pT1, 10 pT2 tumors) were stained using the SP142 PD-L1 antibody on Ventana Benchmark Ultra and Leica Bond-III stainers, manually scored, and compared using accuracy and Cohen’s kappa measures.

Results

Both devices yielded highly concordant PD-L1 immune cell scores (accuracy 0.84, Cohen’s κ 0.732). Moreover, we found similar tumor cell (TC) PD-L1 scores using both stainers, and a trend towards greater TC scores in pT2 stage samples (p = 0.05).

Conclusion

This study is the first to compare the SP142 antibody in bladder cancer on two different stainers. Our results indicate that both Benchmark Ultra and Bond-III stainers yield highly concordant results using the SP142 PD-L1 antibody.

Efficacy and safety of PD-L1 inhibitors versus PD-1 inhibitors in first-line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 + Chemo) have achieved substantial progress in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, evidence about programmed cell death 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (PD-1 + Chemo) in SCLC is relatively lacking. Whether PD-1 inhibitors differ from PD-L1 inhibitors in their clinical outcomes remains controversial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis to compare efficacy and safety of PD-L1 + Chemo vs PD-1 + Chemo in ES-SCLC by searching PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and major oncology conferences. We examined overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

We included four randomized trials (IMpower133, CASPIAN, KEYNOTE-604, and EA5161) with a total of 1553 patients. Direct comparison showed that PD-L1 + Chemo (PFS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.79; OS: HR 0.75) and PD-1 + Chemo (PFS: HR 0.72; OS: HR 0.77) significantly prolonged survival time compared with chemotherapy alone. But PD-L1 + Chemo (relative risk [RR]: 1.07) and PD-1 + Chemo (RR: 1.13) were not superior to chemotherapy alone in terms of ORR. Indirect comparison showed no significant difference in clinical efficacy between PD-L1 + Chemo and PD-1 + Chemo (OS: HR 0.99; PFS: HR 1.10; ORR: RR 0.95). We further stratified patients according to subgroups in terms of OS. In the subgroup of patients with brain metastasis, PD-L1 + Chemo tended to prolong OS (HR: 0.61, 0.28 to 1.32). There were no significant differences between PD-L1 + Chemo and PD-1 + Chemo regarding safety analyses. However, PD-L1 + Chemo exhibited a better safety profile in reducing the risk of treatment discontinuation due to AEs (RR: 0.43, 0.19 to 0.95) and pneumonia (pneumonia of any grade, RR: 0.59, 0.24 to 1.42; pneumonia of grade ≥ 3, RR: 0.37, 0.10 to 1.39).

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 + Chemo and PD-1 + Chemo provided a significant survival benefit relative to chemotherapy alone for ES-SCLC. The efficacy and safety of PD-L1 + Chemo and PD-1 + Chemo were similar based on current evidence.

Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Circulating Tumor Cells as a Predictor of Treatment Response in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma

Simple Summary

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are commonly used in treating advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma. Contrary to evaluating PD-L1 expression in tumor biopsy samples, this study assessed whether PD-L1 expression in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be a predictor of treatment response to PD-L1 inhibitors. The current study proved that there was no statistically significant correlation between the presence of PD-L1-positive CTCs and PD-L1 expression in tumor tissues. Moreover, PD-L1-positive CTCs at baseline could be used as a biomarker to identify patients suitable for PD-L1 blockade therapy. Dynamic changes in PD-L1-positive CTCs during the course of treatment are predictive factors of immunotherapy response and prognostic factors of disease control.

Abstract

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are commonly used in treating advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma (UC). Therefore, this study evaluated the relationship between PD-L1 expression in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and treatment response to PD-L1 inhibitors using blood samples collected from patients with UC (n = 23). Subsequently, PD-L1 expression and its clinical correlation were analyzed. All patients had CTCs before PD-L1 inhibitory treatment, of which 15 had PD-L1-positive CTCs. However, PD-L1-positive expression in CTCs was not correlated with PD-L1 expression in tumor biopsy samples. Patients with PD-L1-positive CTCs had better disease control (DC) rates than those without PD-L1-positive CTCs. Moreover, changes in the proportion of PD-L1-positive CTCs were associated with disease outcomes. Furthermore, the PD-L1-positive CTC count in 9 of 11 patients who achieved DC had significantly decreased (p = 0.01). In four patients with progressive disease, this was higher or did not change. PD-L1-positive CTCs at baseline could be used as a biomarker to identify patients suitable for PD-L1 blockade therapy. Dynamic changes in PD-L1-positive CTCs during the course of treatment are predictive factors of immunotherapy response and prognostic factors of disease control. Hence, PD-L1-positive CTCs could be employed as a real-time molecular biomarker for individualized immunotherapy.

Neutrophil extracellular traps in cancer: not only catching microbes

Neutrophils are the most abundant type of white blood cells circulating throughout the bloodstream and are often considered the frontline defenders in innate immunity. However, neutrophils are increasingly being recognized as having an important role in tumorigenesis and carcinogenesis due to their aberrant activation by molecules released into the tumor microenvironment. One defensive response of neutrophils that is aberrantly triggered during the neoplastic process is called NETosis, where activated neutrophils expel their DNA and intracellular contents in a web-like structure known as a neutrophil extracellular trap (NET). In cancer, NETosis has been linked to increased disease progression, metastasis, and complications such as venous thromboembolism. NET structures released by neutrophils can also serve as a scaffold for clot formation, shining new light on the role of neutrophils and NETosis in coagulation-mediated diseases.

Here, we review current available knowledge regarding NET and the related NETosis process in cancer patients, with an emphasis on pre-clinical and clinical data fostering the identification and validation of biomarkers of NET with a predictive/prognostic role in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy agents. NETosis biomarkers, e.g., citH3, may integrate correlates of immunogenicity currently available (e.g., PD-L1 expression, TMB, TILs) and help select the subsets of patients who may most benefit from the use of the therapeutic weapons under discussion.

Immunotherapy of high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

Bladder cancer remains a prevalent and often lethal cancer. Fortunately, recent clinical trials using immunotherapeutics demonstrate promise to improve treatment outcomes. Several of these immunotherapies have already established their value in the metastatic space and likely will soon have indications in the non-metastatic space.

AREAS COVERED

This review will cover immunotherapies ranging for well-studied BCG administration to more novel medications such as PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors, CTLA-4 inhibitors, IL-15 super agonists, and immune modulating gene therapies. Specifically, the article will address the mechanisms of actions, clinical evidence supporting their use, and the presence of any FDA regulatory approval for these medications in the treatment of high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

With the publication of clinical data supporting the use of immunotherapies, these novel medications are likely to be adopted for treatment of high grade non-metastatic bladder cancer. While BCG is likely to remain a primary medication for high grade bladder cancer for the near future, BCG will likely be co-administered with immunomodulatory medications in some patients to enhance the medications effect in the future. Clinical trials are still ongoing and will demonstrate which of these multiple treatment options yield results worthy of a modification in our current treatment paradigm.

Associations between DNA Damage and PD-L1 Expression in Ovarian Cancer, a Potential Biomarker for Clinical Response

Simple Summary

This work establishes that ovarian tumors contain persistent oxidative DNA damage levels that can be measured using Repair Assisted Damage Detection (RADD). The persistent DNA damage correlates with increased protein expression of PD-L1, establishing a link between genomic instability and PD-L1 expression across ovarian tumors. DNA damage may be a potential biomarker for immunotherapy.

Abstract

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are currently under investigation as a potential treatment option for ovarian cancer. Although this therapy has shown promise, its efficacy is highly variable among patients. Evidence suggests that genomic instability influences the expression of PD-L1, but little is known about this relationship in ovarian cancer. To examine the relationship between PD-L1 expression and genomic instability, we measured DNA damage using Repair Assisted Damage Detection (RADD). We then correlated the presence of persistent DNA damage in the ovarian tumor with protein expression of PD-L1 using immunohistochemistry. Ovarian tumors showed a high prevalence of oxidative DNA damage. As the level of oxidative DNA damage increased, we saw a significant correlation with PD-L1 expression. The highest correlation between DNA damage and PD-L1 expression was observed for mucinous ovarian tumors (r = 0.82), but a strong correlation was also observed for high grade serous and endometrioid tumors (r = 0.67 and 0.69, respectively). These findings link genomic instability to PD-L1 protein expression in ovarian cancer and suggest that persistent DNA damage can be used as a potential biomarker for patient selection for immunotherapy treatment.

Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Immunotherapy Agents in Phase I Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Immuno-oncology (IO) agents have demonstrated efficacy across many tumor types and have led to change in standard of care. In breast cancer, atezolizumab and pembrolizumab were recently FDA-approved in combination with chemotherapy specifically for patients with PD-L1-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the single agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors demonstrate only modest single agent efficacy in breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of novel IO agents in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), beyond TNBC, treated in phase I clinical trials at the University of Colorado.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis using a database of patients with MBC who received treatment with IO agents in phase I/Ib clinical trials at the University of Colorado Hospital from January 1, 2012 to July 1, 2018. Patient demographics, treatments and clinical outcomes were obtained.

RESULTS

We identified 43 patients treated with an IO agent either as a single agent or in combination. The average age was 53 years; 55.8% had hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, 39.5% TNBC and 4.7% HER2-positive. Patients received an average of 2 prior lines of chemotherapy (range 0-7) in the metastatic setting. Most patients (72.1%) received IO alone and 27.9% received IO plus chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months and median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months. Patients remaining on study ≥ 6 months (20.9%) were more likely to be treated with chemotherapy plus IO compared to patients with a PFS < 6 months (77.8% v. 14.7%). No differences in number of metastatic sites, prior lines of chemotherapy, breast cancer subtype, absolute lymphocyte count, or LDH were identified between patients with a PFS ≥ 6 months vs. < 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our phase I experience demonstrates benefit from IO therapy that was not limited to patients with TNBC and confirms improved efficacy from IO agents in combination with chemotherapy. A subset of patients with MBC treated in phase I clinical trials with an IO agent derived prolonged clinical benefit. Predictors of response to immunotherapy in breast cancer remain uncharacterized and further research is needed to identify these factors.

Endocrine Adverse Events Caused by Different Types and Different Doses of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Solid Tumors: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the risks of endocrine adverse events in patients with malignancies treated with different types and different doses of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). PubMed and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials on ICIs and endocrine adverse events since 2000, and meta-analysis was carried out. Twenty-six randomized controlled trials comprising 13 824 patients with malignancies were included. Compared with the other tumor therapies (used as a control group), patients treated with programmed death-1 inhibitors appeared to be at higher risks of hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, thyroiditis, hypophysitis or hypopituitarism, and type 1 diabetes mellitus, while there was no difference in the risk of primary adrenal insufficiency. It was also found that patients treated with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 inhibitors were at higher risk of hypophysitis or hypopituitarism, primary adrenal insufficiency, and hypothyroidism. In comparison, patients treated with programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors were at higher risk of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Compared with the control group, both low-dose and high-dose ICI groups were at higher risk of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism, and the low-dose group had increased risk of thyroiditis and primary adrenal insufficiency. There was no significant difference in the risk of type 1 diabetes between the low-dose group and the high-dose group. The risk of hypophysitis or hypopituitarism in the high-dose group (relative risk, 20.12; 95% confidence interval, 8.02-50.46) was significantly higher than that in the low-dose group (relative risk, 4.92; 95% confidence interval, 2.11-11.47). The risk of endocrine adverse events was increased in patients treated with ICIs. Different types and doses of ICIs have varying characteristics of endocrine adverse events.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibition With Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Safety Results

The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) administered concurrently with or after definitive chemoradiation (CRT) in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been detailed in several studies. We performed a systematic review to determine pneumonitis rates using ICIs with CRT. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched using keywords and MeSH terms. Studies using anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy, either sequentially or concurrently with CRT, for patients with stage III NSCLC were included. A meta-analysis of pneumonitis rates was performed based on weighted pooled proportion, using random-effects models. Weighting was performed by the inverse variance or standard error of event rates. Comparative analysis between groups was performed. Odds ratios (OR) were used as the primary summary statistics. A total of 13 studies were identified (6 prospective clinical trials and 7 real-world reports). Rates of grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis were significantly higher in clinical trials using anti-PD-1 therapy compared with PD-L1 inhibitors (8.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2%-11.9% vs. 4.4%; 95% CI, 3.0%-6.6%; OR, 2.0; P = .01). Clinical trials using concurrent ICI therapy with CRT had greater rates of grade 2 pneumonitis compared with sequential administration (23.0%; 95% CI, 15.8%-32.3% vs. 11.0%; 95% CI, 6.6%-17.8%; OR, 0.42; P = .02). Higher rates of grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis were observed in real-world studies compared with clinical trials involving sequential PD-L1 therapy (9.9%; 95% CI, 5.3%-17.9% vs. 4.4%; 95% CI, 2.9%-6.7%; OR, 0.43; P < .01). The suggestion of increased pneumonitis with a concurrent ICI strategy and using anti-PD-1 therapies warrants further consideration in future comparative studies.

Neuro-ophthalmic Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel cancer therapies that may be associated with immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) and come to the attention of neuro-ophthalmologists. This systematic review aims to synthesize the reported ICI-associated IRAEs relevant to neuro-ophthalmologists to help in the diagnosis and management of these conditions.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature indexed by MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases was searched from inception to May 2020. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Primary studies on ICIs and neuro-ophthalmic complications were included. Outcomes included number of cases and incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs.

RESULTS

Neuro-ophthalmic complications of ICIs occurred in 0.46% of patients undergoing ICI and may affect the afferent and efferent visual systems. Afferent complications include optic neuritis (12.8%), neuroretinitis (0.9%), and giant cell arteritis (3.7%). Efferent complications include myasthenia gravis (MG) (45.0%), thyroid-like eye disease (11.9%), orbital myositis (13.8%), general myositis with ptosis (7.3%), internuclear ophthalmoplegia (0.9%), opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome (0.9%), and oculomotor nerve palsy (0.9%). Pembrolizumab was the most common causative agent for neuro-ophthalmic complications (32.1%). Mortality was highest for MG (19.8%). Most patients (79.8%) experienced improvement or complete resolution of neuro-ophthalmic symptoms due to cessation of ICI and immunosuppression with systemic corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

While incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs is low, clinicians involved in the care of cancer patients must be aware of their presentation to facilitate prompt recognition and management. Collaboration between oncology and neuro-ophthalmology teams is required to effectively manage patients and reduce morbidity and mortality.

Rheumatic immune-related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) block the major inhibitory pathways in T cells, resulting in an augmented antitumor response. Immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) are a new class of side effects caused by ICIs and tend to be more prevalent in patients with preexisting autoantibodies and autoimmune diseases. The rheumatic subset of irAEs mainly includes arthralgia, arthritis, myalgia, myositis, vasculitis, sicca syndrome, scleroderma and systemic lupus erythematosus. The most common classification system for AEs, the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, is of limited use for irAEs, especially rheumatic irAEs. Therapy with glucocorticoid and temporary or permanent discontinuation of ICIs are the cornerstones of irAE treatment, and can be complemented with immunosuppressants (e.g., methotrexate), biologic agents (e.g., tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and interleukin‐6 receptor antagonists), intravenous immunoglobin and plasma exchange. Thus, the evaluation and treatment of rheumatic irAEs require multidisciplinary cooperation among physicians. Here, we review the most prevalent ICI‐associated rheumatic irAEs.

Incidence and Clinical Features of Immune-Related Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Receiving Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 Inhibitors

Background

Programmed cell death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with a side effect profile that may differ from other classes of ICIs such as those directed against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte−associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death 1 receptor (PD-1). Being the more recently approved class of checkpoint inhibitors, there are no studies investigating the frequency, etiology and predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients receiving PD-L1 inhibitors.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received PD-L1 inhibitors during 2017 to 2018 in our healthcare system. AKI was defined by a ≥1.5-fold rise in serum creatinine from baseline. The etiology of all cases of sustained AKI (lasting >48 hours) and clinical course were determined by review of electronic health records.

Results

The final analysis included 599 patients. Within 12 months of ICI initiation, 104 patients (17%) experienced AKI, and 36 (6%) experienced sustained AKI; however, only 5 (<1%) experienced suspected PD-L1–related AKI. The PD-L1–related AKI occurred a median of 99 days after starting therapy. All patients concurrently received another medication known to cause acute interstitial nephritis (proton pump inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or antibiotics) at the time of the suspected PDL1-related AKI.

Conclusion

Although AKI is common in patients receiving PD-L1 therapy, the incidence of suspected PD-L1–related AKI is low (<1%) and may be less common when compared to other classes of ICIs. This cohort provides further validation that other drugs associated with acute interstitial nephritis may be involved in the pathogenesis of ICI-related AKI.

The Latest Findings of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Application in Gynecologic Cancers

Gynecologic cancers account for approximately 11% of the newly diagnosed cancers in women in the United States and for 18% globally. The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) influences the clinical outcome of cancer patients and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1), anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1), and anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4), which have been approved for treating different types of malignancies. Antibodies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint have shown dynamic and durable tumor regressions, suggesting a rebalancing of the host-tumor interaction. There are several the US food and drug administration (FDA)-approved ICIs targeting PD-1, including pembrolizumab and nivolumab, as well as those targeting PD-L1, including avelumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab for melanoma, renal cell cancer, colorectal cancer, head and neck cancer, cervix cancer, urothelial cancer, and lung cancer. Current pre-clinical and clinical studies assessing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in several gynecologic cancers have reported significant antitumor activity. In this review, we investigate pre-clinical and clinical studies that describe the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, with a particular focus on ongoing clinical trials, analyzing the oncological outcome and adverse effects of ICIs in gynecologic cancers.

Use of Immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in the United States and around the world. Approximately 13% of lung cancers are small cell lung cancer (SCLC). SCLC is generally classified as a limited-stage and extensive-stage disease depending on the extent of involvement. For patients with the extensive-stage disease, until recently, chemotherapy alone has been the recommended treatment, although radiotherapy could be used in select patients for palliation of symptoms. The standard of care for extensive-stage SCLC is platinum doublet chemotherapy with either cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with etoposide. Even though first-line therapy has an initial response rate of 60-80%, the prognosis is poor, with overall survival of 10-12 months. The only FDA-approved second line of therapy is topotecan, approved both as an intravenous formulation as well as an oral formulation, with response rates of 6-12% in chemorefractory disease and 15-37% in chemosensitive disease. Immunotherapy has recently been approved as a first-line agent in metastatic SCLC in combination with chemotherapy. It is also approved as a third-line agent in metastatic SCLC after the failure of two chemotherapy regimens. The FDA approved four drugs, two of them being PD-1 inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab), and two of them being PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab and durvalumab) in SCLC. This review article summarizes the significance of immunotherapy in the treatment of extensive-stage SCLC, its side effects, and limitations.

PD-(L)1 Inhibitors in Combination with Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Pairwise Meta-Analysis

The combination of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors with chemotherapy has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of the combined strategy in this setting. For this purpose, we performed a literature search of randomized controlled trials comparing PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in stage IV NSCLC patients. Seven clinical trials with 4562 patients were included. In the intention-to-treat wildtype population, PD-(L)1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.65, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.67-0.86; p < 0.001) compared to chemotherapy. A significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) was also observed with the combined strategy (Odds ratio (OR) = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.70-2.63, p < 0.001). Furthermore, in all the analyzed subgroups, addition of PD-(L)1 inhibitors to chemotherapy significantly improved efficacy endpoints. Specifically, stratification according to PD-L1 expression revealed a benefit across all patients, regardless of their PFS status. In conclusion, PD-(L)1 blockade added to standard platinum-based chemotherapy significantly improved PFS, OS, and ORR in the up-front treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Clinical Development of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer: Still a Long Way to Go

OPINION STATEMENT

Currently, only patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer whose tumors are PD-L1 positive are eligible for receiving immunotherapy. Other studies have explored new combinations with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in different disease settings and populations. Data from neoadjuvant trials testing the addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to standard treatment are promising and have led to increases in pathologic complete response rates; however, data on survival outcomes are still immature. There is still much work needed to optimize benefits of immunotherapy in breast cancer and correlative studies in patients treated with immunotherapy are urgently needed to inform the best strategies for further development.

Looking for the Optimal PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor in Cancer Treatment: A Comparison in Basic Structure, Function, and Clinical Practice

Programmed cell death protein-1/ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) targeted immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the focus of tumor treatment due to their promising efficacy. Currently, several PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have been approved for clinical practice with several more in clinical trials. Notably, based on available trial data, the selection of different PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the therapeutic application and the corresponding efficacy varies. Widespread attention then is increasingly raised to the clinical comparability of different PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The comparison of the inhibitors could not only help clinicians make in-depth understanding of them, but also further facilitate the selection of the optimal inhibitor for patients in treatment as well as for future clinical research and the development of new related drugs. As we all know, molecular structure could determine molecular function, which further affects their application. Therefore, in this review, we aim to comprehensively compare the structural basis, molecular biological functions, and clinical practice of different PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Association of immune-related pneumonitis with the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Cutaneous adverse events (AEs) have been positively associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in patients with melanoma, but little is known regarding the association between checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) and programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitor efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A single-institution, retrospective medical record review of patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between 1 September 2015 and 1 June 2019 was conducted. A total of 276 NSCLC patients with or without immune-related pneumonitis who received at least one dose of ICIs and had at least one follow-up visit were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves of the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients stratified according to immune-related pneumonitis development were evaluated with the log-rank test as a preplanned primary objective. Multivariate analysis of PFS was performed with Cox proportional hazard regression models.

Results

In the cohort of 276 patients, 42 patients developed CIP attributed to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Survival analysis showed that the overall response rate was significantly higher in patients with CIP than in those without CIP (61.90% versus 29.91%, respectively, p < 0.01), and that CIP development was significantly associated with increased PFS (45.80 weeks versus 21.15 weeks, respectively, p < 0.01). Additionally, 16-week landmark analysis produced the same results. Similarly, subgroup analysis of PD-1 inhibitor-treated, nivolumab-treated, and pembrolizumab-treated groups also revealed that CIP increased survival in NSCLC patients. Additionally, grade 1-2 pneumonitis showed an association with increased ICI efficacy in NSCLC; however, grade 3-4 pneumonitis did not. In addition, only two of the four pneumonitis radiological subtypes showed associations with increased ICI efficacy in NSCLC.

Conclusion

CIP is associated with enhanced PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy in NSCLC patients. Grade 1-2 pneumonitis and the radiological features of hypersensitivity and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) may be signs of enhanced ICI efficacy. However, further studies with larger numbers of patients and longer follow-up times are needed to validate our findings.

Outstanding clinical efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We evaluated programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma (PC).

METHODS

We created two cohorts of patients diagnosed with pulmonary PC from 2016 to 2019, PD-L1 expression and programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy cohorts. The PD-L1 expression cohort included all patients evaluated for PD-L1 expression, irrespective of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. High PD-L1 expression was defined as ≥50% positive tumour cells (TC) for 22C3, ≥25% for SP263 or ≥10%/5% TC/immune cell (IC) for SP142. The PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy cohort included patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, irrespective of PD-L1 tests.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five of 175 patients diagnosed with pulmonary PCs were included in the PD-L1 expression cohort. Among them, 112 patients (89.6%) had PD-L1-positive (≥1%) tumours and 100 (80.0%) had tumours with high PD-L1 expression. A total of 49 patients were included in the efficacy cohort: 40 received pembrolizumab, 7 nivolumab and 2 atezolizumab. The objective response rate was 49.0%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.2 months and a median overall survival of 22.2 months. In the efficacy cohort, high PD-L1 expression (n = 41) was associated with longer PFS (median: 7.2 versus 1.5 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53 [0.22-1.29], p = 0.16) and overall survival (median: 22.2 versus 3.5, HR: 0.21 [0.08-0.57], p = 0.001) than low/negative/unknown PD-L1 expression (n = 8).

CONCLUSION

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors show outstanding efficacy for pulmonary PCs, and this is possibly attributable to high PD-L1 expression in these tumours.

Liver metastases and the efficacy of the PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective: To explore the relations between liver metastases (LM) and the efficacy of the treatments with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors.

Method: Pubmed, Embase, American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society for Medical Oncology were searched to select eligible studies about PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab, Avelumab, Durvalumab, and Atezolizumab). We included only the original randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including the hazard ratios (HR) of death in both patients with LM and patients without LM. Then the data were extracted for the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses of cancer types and drug types were also performed.

Results: 5293 patients [1246 (24%) patients with LM, and 4047 (76%) patients without LM] from the eight RCTs were included for the final analysis. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of death in the patients with LM was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.93, P = .003) while the pooled HR in the patients without LM was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.79, P < .001). Additionally, no significant difference was found between the two groups (P = .137).

Conclusion: No statistically significant association of liver metastases with the efficacy of treatments with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced or metastatic cancer was found in the stratified analyses. Moreover, future studies about the safety of the PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with or without liver metastases are warranted.

Characterization of PD-L1 binding sites by a combined FMO/GRID-DRY approach

The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand, PD-L1, constitute an important co-inhibitory immune checkpoint leading to downregulation of immune system. Tumor cells developed a strategy to trigger PD-1/PD-L1 pathway reducing the T cell anticancer activity. Anti-PD-L1 small drugs, generally with improved pharmacokinetic and technological profiles than monoclonal antibodies, became an attractive research topic. Nevertheless, still few works have been published on the chemical features of possible binding sites. In this work, we applied a novel computational protocol based on the combination of the ab initio Fragment Molecular Orbital (FMO) method and a newly developed GRID-DRY approach in order to characterize the PD-L1 binding sites, starting from PD-1/PD-L1 and PD-L1/BMS-ligands (Bristol-Mayers Squibb ligands) complexes. The FMO method allows the calculation of the pair-residues as well as the ligand-residues interactions with ab initio accuracy, whereas the GRID-DRY approach is an effective tool to investigate hydrophobic interactions, not easily detectable by ab initio methods. The present GRID-DRY protocol is able to determine the energy contributions of each ligand atoms to each hydrophobic interaction, both qualitatively and quantitatively. We were also able to identify the three specific hot regions involved in PD-1/PD-L1 protein-protein interaction and in PD-L1/BMS-ligand interactions, in agreement with preceding theoretical/experimental results, and to suggest a specific pharmacophore for PD-L1 inhibitors.

Hospitalization and emergency department utilization in patients with advanced melanoma receiving pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab plus nivolumab in US academic centers

Background: Both pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) and ipilimumab + nivolumab (IPI + NIVO) are FDA-approved immunotherapy regimens for advanced melanoma (AM). Each regimen has different toxicity profiles potentially impacting healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). This study compared real-world hospitalization and emergency department (ED) utilization within 12 months of therapy initiation of each regimen.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in AM patients ≥18 years old initiating PEMBRO or IPI + NIVO between January 1, 2016-December 30, 2017. Patients were identified from 12 US-based academic and satellite centers. All-cause hospitalization ED visits were identified. These events were used to calculate rates per 1,000 patient months. Utilization between groups was compared using multivariate logistic regression.Results: In total, 400 patients were included (200 PEMBRO, 200 IPI + NIVO). PEMBRO vs IPI + NIVO patients had poorer Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status, 29% 2-4, vs 12% (p < .001); more diabetes, 21% vs 13% (p = .045); were more often PD-L1 expression positive, 77% vs 63% (p = .011); and less likely BRAF mutant, 35% vs 50% (p = .003). The proportion with more than one hospitalization over 12 months was 17% PEMBRO vs 24% IPI + NIVO. Less than 2% had more than one admission and none had more than two. Unadjusted mean (SD) hospitalizations per 1,000 patient-months were 16 (37) and 20 (38), PEMBRO and IPI + NIVO, respectively. Adjusted odds ratio for hospitalization was 0.6 (95% CI = 0.3-0.9; p = .027) for PEMBRO vs IPI + NIVO. ED visits occurred in 18% vs 21%, PEMBRO and IPI + NIVO, respectively, 0.7 (p = .186).Conclusions: PEMBRO patients had a significantly lower probability of hospitalization through 12 months vs IPI + NIVO. The probability of ED visits did not differ.

Fatal Adverse Events Associated With Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence of fatal adverse events that were associated with the use of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, to describe them and to statistically depict factors that were associated with these events.

Method

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were completely searched based on the following terms or relevant Medical Subject Heading ones: "atezolizumab", "durvalumab", "avelumab", and "cemiplimab".

Results

A total of 26 eligible studies were identified, incorporating 6,896 unique participants. The overall incidence was 1.24% (95% CI: 0.93-1.65%). The incidence and odds were higher in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than those with urothelial carcinoma [(2.25 vs. 0.85, p = 0.04), (odds ratio [OR]: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.04-6.97, p = 0.04)], higher in the middle-aged group than the young group [(1.74 vs. 0.89, p = 0.01), (OR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.26-3.61, p = 0.01)], and higher in the trial phase I than the trial phase II [(1.76 vs. 0.60, p = 0.01), (OR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.13-0.75, p = 0.01)]. Notably, the trial phase I had a higher incidence than trial phase II or III following regulating for cancer types and average age (OR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.11-0.71, p = 0.01, OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.24-0.95, p = 0.04, respectively). In terms of organ-specific fatal adverse events, interstitial lung disease (ILD) was frequently documented. A variety of respiratory system-related fatal adverse events were recorded, including but not limited to pneumonia and respiratory failure. As for organ-unspecific fatal adverse events, substantial cases of sepsis and neutropenia were recorded.

Conclusion

This study firstly provided a comprehensive incidence and the spectrum of fatal adverse events associated with PD-L1 inhibitors, and identified three potential susceptible factors of that, yielding a capability for clinicians to distinguish high-risk populations from relatively low-risk ones, and facilitating to improve the safety of PD-L1 inhibitors broadly used in the clinical setting.

Triple blockade of EGFR, MEK and PD-L1 has antitumor activity in colorectal cancer models with constitutive activation of MAPK signaling and PD-L1 overexpression

BACKGROUND

Molecular mechanisms driving acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are complex but generally involve the activation of the downstream RAS-RAF-MEK-MAPK pathway. Nevertheless, even if inhibition of EGFR and MEK could be a strategy for overcoming anti-EGFR resistance, its use is limited by the development of MEK inhibitor (MEKi) resistance.

METHODS

We have generated in vitro and in vivo different CRC models in order to underline the mechanisms of MEKi resistance.

RESULTS

The three different in vitro MEKi resistant models, two generated by human CRC cells quadruple wild type for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PI3KCA genes (SW48-MR and LIM1215-MR) and one by human CRC cells harboring KRAS mutation (HCT116-MR) showed features related to the gene signature of colorectal cancer CMS4 with up-regulation of immune pathway as confirmed by microarray and western blot analysis. In particular, the MEKi phenotype was associated with the loss of epithelial features and acquisition of mesenchymal markers and morphology. The change in morphology was accompanied by up-regulation of PD-L1 expression and activation of EGFR and its downstream pathway, independently to RAS mutation status. To extend these in vitro findings, we have obtained mouse colon cancer MC38- and CT26-MEKi resistant syngeneic models (MC38-MR and CT26-MR). Combined treatment with MEKi, EGFR inhibitor (EGFRi) and PD-L1 inhibitor (PD-L1i) resulted in a marked inhibition of tumor growth in both models.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest a strategy to potentially improve the efficacy of MEK inhibition by co-treatment with EGFR and PD-L1 inhibitors via modulation of host immune responses.