Gedatolisib in combination with palbociclib and endocrine therapy in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: results from the dose expansion groups of an open-label, phase 1b study

BACKGROUND

The PI3K-mTOR pathway is frequently dysregulated in breast cancer. Combining an inhibitor targeting all class I PI3K isoforms and mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1)-mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) with endocrine therapy and a CDK4/6 inhibitor might provide more effective tumour control than standard-of-care therapy. To evaluate this hypothesis, gedatolisib, a pan-PI3K-mTOR inhibitor, was assessed in a phase 1b trial combined with palbociclib and endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer. Results from the dose expansion portion of this trial are reported herein.

METHODS

This multicentre, open-label, phase 1b study recruited female patients aged at least 18 years from 17 sites across the USA with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Four patient groups were studied in the dose expansion portion of the study: treatment-naive in the advanced setting (first line; group A), progression on 1-2 lines of endocrine therapy but CDK4/6 inhibitor-naive (group B); and one or more previous lines (second-line and higher) of therapy, including a CDK4/6 inhibitor (groups C and D). Gedatolisib 180 mg was administered intravenously weekly in 28-day treatment cycles for groups A-C, and on days 1, 8, and 15 for group D. Letrozole (group A), fulvestrant (groups B-D), and palbociclib (all groups) were administered at standard doses and schedules. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST version 1.1 in the evaluable analysis set. This trial is completed and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02684032.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 19, 2017, and June 19, 2019, 103 female participants were enrolled in the dose expansion groups A (n=31), B (n=13), C (n=32), and D (n=27). Median follow-up was 16·6 months (IQR 5·7-48·4) for group A, 11·0 months (7·6-16·9) for group B, 3·6 months (1·8-7·5) for group C, and 9·4 months (5·3-16·7) for group D for the primary endpoint. Gedatolisib, palbociclib, and endocrine therapy induced an objective response in 23 (85·2%; 90% CI 69·2-94·8) of 27 evaluable first-line participants (group A). In the second-line and higher setting, an objective response was observed in eight (61·5%; 90% CI 35·5-83·4) of 13 evaluable group B participants, seven (25·0%; 12·4-41·9) of 28 evaluable group C participants, and 15 (55·6%; 38·2-72·0) of 27 evaluable group D participants; this included participants with both wild-type and mutated PIK3CA tumours. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (65 [63%] of 103), stomatitis (28 [27%]), and rash (21 [20%]). Grade 3-4 hyperglycaemia was reported in six (6%) participants. 23 (22%) of 103 participants had a treatment-related serious adverse event, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Nine (9%) participants discontinued treatment because of a treatment-emergent adverse event.

INTERPRETATION

Gedatolisib plus palbociclib and endocrine therapy showed a promising objective response rate compared with the published results for standard-of-care therapies and had an acceptable safety profile.

FUNDING

Pfizer and Celcuity.

Phase Ia/b Study of Giredestrant ± Palbociclib and ± Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Locally Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Giredestrant is an investigational next-generation, oral, selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader for the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. We present the primary analysis results of the phase Ia/b GO39932 study (NCT03332797).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with ER+, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy received single-agent giredestrant (10, 30, 90, or 250 mg), or giredestrant (100 mg) ± palbociclib 125 mg ± luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist. Detailed cardiovascular assessment was conducted with giredestrant 100 mg. Endpoints included safety (primary), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy.

RESULTS

As of January 28, 2021, with 175 patients enrolled, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the MTD was not reached. Adverse events (AE) related to giredestrant occurred in 64.9% and 59.4% of patients in the single-agent ± LHRH agonist and giredestrant + palbociclib ± LHRH agonist cohorts, respectively (giredestrant-only-related grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 4.5% of patients across the single-agent cohorts and 3.1% of those with giredestrant + palbociclib). Dose-dependent asymptomatic bradycardia was observed, but no clinically significant changes in cardiac-related outcomes: heart rate, blood pressure, or exercise duration. Clinical benefit was observed in all cohorts (48.6% of patients in the single-agent cohort and 81.3% in the giredestrant + palbociclib ± LHRH agonist cohort), with no clear dose relationship, including in patients with ESR1-mutated tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Giredestrant was well tolerated and clinically active in patients who progressed on prior endocrine therapy. Results warrant further evaluation of giredestrant in randomized trials in early- and late-stage ER+ breast cancer.

Safety and Efficacy of Tucatinib, Letrozole, and Palbociclib in Patients with Previously Treated HR+/HER2+ Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To overcome resistance to antihormonal and HER2-targeted agents mediated by cyclin D1-CDK4/6 complex, we proposed an oral combination of the HER2 inhibitor tucatinib, aromatase inhibitor letrozole, and CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (TLP combination) for treatment of HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Phase Ib/II TLP trial (NCT03054363) enrolled patients with HR+/HER2+ MBC treated with ≥2 HER2-targeted agents. The phase Ib primary endpoint was safety of the regimen evaluated by NCI CTCAE version 4.3. The phase II primary endpoint was efficacy by median progression-free survival (mPFS).

RESULTS

Forty-two women ages 22 to 81 years were enrolled. Patients received a median of two lines of therapy in the metastatic setting, 71.4% had visceral disease, 35.7% had CNS disease. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) of grade ≥3 were neutropenia (64.3%), leukopenia (23.8%), diarrhea (19.0%), and fatigue (14.3%). Tucatinib increased AUC10-19 hours of palbociclib 1.7-fold, requiring palbociclib dose reduction from 125 to 75 mg daily. In 40 response-evaluable patients, mPFS was 8.4 months, with similar mPFS in non-CNS and CNS cohorts (10.0 months vs. 8.2 months; P = 0.9). Overall response rate was 44.5%, median duration of response was 13.9 months, and clinical benefit rate was 70.4%; 60% of patients were on treatment for ≥6 months, 25% for ≥1 year, and 10% for ≥2 years. In the CNS cohort, 26.6% of patients remained on study for ≥1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

TLP combination was safe and tolerable. AEs were expected and manageable with supportive therapy and dose reductions. TLP showed excellent efficacy for an all-oral chemotherapy-free regimen warranting further testing. See related commentary by Huppert and Rugo, p. 4993.

Short-term topiramate treatment prevents radiation-induced cytotoxic edema in preclinical models of breast-cancer brain metastasis

BACKGROUND

Brain edema is a common complication of brain metastases (BM) and associated treatment. The extent to which cytotoxic edema, the first step in the sequence that leads to ionic edema, vasogenic edema, and brain swelling, contributes to radiation-induced brain edema during BM remains unknown. This study aimed to determine whether radiation-associated treatment of BM induces cytotoxic edema and the consequences of blocking the edema in preclinical models of breast-cancer brain metastases (BCBM).

METHODS

Using in vitro and in vivo models, we measured astrocytic swelling, trans-electric resistance (TEER), and aquaporin 4 (AQP4) expression following radiation. Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of AQP4 in astrocytes and cancer cells was used to assess the role of AQP4 in astrocytic swelling and brain water intake. An anti-epileptic drug that blocks AQP4 function (topiramate) was used to prevent cytotoxic edema in models of BM.

RESULTS

Radiation-induced astrocytic swelling and transient upregulation of AQP4 occurred within the first 24 hours following radiation. Topiramate decreased radiation-induced astrocytic swelling and loss of TEER in astrocytes in vitro, and acute short-term treatment (but not continuous administration), prevented radiation-induced increase in brain water content without pro-tumorigenic effects in multiple preclinical models of BCBM. AQP4 was expressed in clinical BM and breast-cancer cell lines, but AQP4 targeting had limited direct pro-tumorigenic or radioprotective effects in cancer cells that could impact its clinical translation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BM could find additional benefits from acute and temporary preventive treatment of radiation-induced cytotoxic edema using anti-epileptic drugs able to block AQP4 function.

The emergence of targeted therapy for HER2-low triple-negative breast cancer: a review of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive sub-type of breast cancer. Despite recent advances, metastatic TNBC remains difficult to treat with limited targeted treatment options. Fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and is composed of a unique linker bound to the topoisomerase I inhibitor DXd. T-DXd has significant anti-tumor activity in patients with HER2-low TNBC.

AREAS COVERED

This review reports on the mechanism, pre-clinical/clinical studies, efficacy, and tolerability of T-DXd. A literature search was conducted via PubMed using keywords such as 'fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan,' 'Enhertu,' and 'HER2-low cancers.'

EXPERT OPINION

The Phase III Destiny-Breast04 Trial showed benefit in progression-free and overall survival in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancers treated with T-DXd compared to treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy. T-DXd is the first pharmaceutical to effectively target a HER2-low population with clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with HER2-low TNBC. Compared to chemotherapy, T-DXd has a similar safety profile, with the additional need for close monitoring for interstitial lung disease. Given the clinical activity of T-DXd in TNBC, it is likely there will be continued efforts to refine HER2-low diagnostics and to develop additional ADCs with other protein targets.

Phase II trial of fulvestrant plus enzalutamide in ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer

This clinical trial combined fulvestrant with the anti-androgen enzalutamide in women with metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer (BC). Eligible patients were women with ECOG 0-2, ER+/HER2- measurable or evaluable metastatic BC. Prior fulvestrant was allowed. Fulvestrant was administered at 500 mg IM on days 1, 15, 29, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Enzalutamide was given at 160 mg po daily. Fresh tumor biopsies were required at study entry and after 4 weeks of treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial was the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24). The median age was 61 years (46-87); PS 1 (0-1); median of 4 prior non-hormonal and 3 prior hormonal therapies for metastatic disease. Twelve had prior fulvestrant, and 91% had visceral disease. CBR24 was 25% (7/28 evaluable). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 weeks (95% CI: 2-52). Adverse events were as expected for hormonal therapy. Significant (p < 0.1) univariate relationships existed between PFS and ER%, AR%, and PIK3CA and/or PTEN mutations. Baseline levels of phospho-proteins in the mTOR pathway were more highly expressed in biopsies of patients with shorter PFS. Fulvestrant plus enzalutamide had manageable side effects. The primary endpoint of CBR24 was 25% in heavily pretreated metastatic ER+/HER2- BC. Short PFS was associated with activation of the mTOR pathway, and PIK3CA and/or PTEN mutations were associated with an increased hazard of progression. Thus, a combination of fulvestrant or other SERD plus AKT/PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with or without AR inhibition warrants investigation in second-line endocrine therapy of metastatic ER+ BC.

Breast cancer brain metastases localization and risk of hydrocephalus: a single institution experience

PURPOSE

Brain metastases occur in up to one-third of patients with breast cancer. aromatase, a marker for estrogen activity that has been shown to promote such metastasis, heavily concentrates in certain midline structures of brain. We hypothesize that breast cancer metastasizes more often to brain areas with higher aromatase activity and that these patients have a higher risk of developing obstructive hydrocephalus.

METHODS

In our retrospective review of 709 patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (January 2014-May 2020), we identified 358 patients treated for metastatic breast or lung cancer. The MRI scan that first showed evidence of brain metastases was reviewed and number of metastases counted by location. Procedures used to treat obstructive hydrocephalus were recorded. Chi square test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of 358 patients, 99 patients with breast cancer had 618 brain metastases and 259 patients with lung cancer had 1487 brain metastases. Compared with expected distribution of brain metastases based on regional brain volumes and metastatic lung carcinoma as a control, patients with breast cancer more often had metastases to the cerebellum, diencephalon, medulla, and parietal lobe, and underwent significantly more neurosurgical interventions for treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus.

CONCLUSION

Brain metastases in patients with breast cancer occurred more often along midline structures of the brain, which we believe may be associated with the increased estrogen activity in these structures. This finding is important for physicians who treat patients with metastatic breast cancer given the higher possibility of developing obstructive hydrocephalus.

Abstract PD13-05: PD13-05 Updated results of a Phase 1b study of gedatolisib plus palbociclib and endocrine therapy in women with hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer: Subgroup analysis by PIK3CA mutation status

Background: Addition of PI3K/mTOR inhibitor after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) can potentially restore sensitivity to CDK4/6i and prevent adaptive activation of the PI3K/mTOR pathway. To evaluate this hypothesis, we conducted a Phase Ib study of gedatolisib (G), a dual inhibitor of PI3K/mTOR, palbociclib (P) a CDK4/6i, and ET (with letrozole [LET] or fulvestrant [FUL]) in women with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). Manageable toxicity and preliminary antitumor activity were observed in 35 patients(pts) enrolled in the dose escalation portion of the study (Forero-Torres, ASCO 2018) and 103 pts enrolled in the expansion portion of the study (Layman, SABCS 2021). Here, we report updated efficacy and safety data and sub-group analysis by PIK3CA mutation status in the four expansion study arms with a March 3, 2022, data cut-off.

Methods: Pts with HR+/HER2- ABC were treated in four expansion arms: A) G+P+LET as first-line treatment, B) G+P+FUL as 2nd line treatment in pts without prior CDK4/6i; C & D) G+P+FUL as 2nd or 3rd line therapy in pts with prior CDK4/6i. P, LET, and FUL were administered at standard doses. G 180 mg was intravenously administered weekly in Arms A, B, and C and three weeks on/one week off in Arm D. The primary endpoint was investigator assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included safety, duration of response and progression free survival (PFS).

Results: Of the 103 pts treated with G+P+ ET in the expansion arms (A-D), 100% had measurable disease at baseline, 71% (73/103) lacked PIK3CA mutations (wild type; WT), 27% (28/103) had PIK3CA-mutations (MT), 70% (72/103) had evidence of bone metastases, and 59% (61/103) had liver metastases. The most frequent grade 3 and 4 treatment related AEs (TRAE) with G+P+ET included neutropenia (63%), stomatitis (27%), rash (20%), fatigue (11%) and hyperglycemia (7%). Treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs was 6.5% in Arm A, 15.4% in Arm B, 9.4% in Arm C and 3.7% in Arm D. Efficacy data for each arm is presented in Table 1. Promising ORR and PFS were seen in all arms regardless of PIK3CA mutation status. In Arm D, ORR was 63% overall, 73% in PIK3CA-MT pts, and 60% in PIK3CA-WT pts. Median PFS in Arm D was 12.9 months with a median follow up of 29 months. 60% and 48% of pts in the PIK3CA-MT and PIK3CA-WT Arm D sub-groups, respectively, were progression free at 12 months.

Conclusions: These preliminary data demonstrate promising activity of G+P+ET combination in pts who were CDK4/6i-naïve and in those whose disease progressed on or after CDK4/6i therapy regardless of PIK3CA mutation status. Encouraging results in CDK4/6i treatment naïve patients warrant further evaluation of gedatolisib in combination with CDK4/6i treatment in the front-line setting. Arm D results provide a strong basis for the initiated Phase 3 study (VIKTORIA-1) in pts whose disease progressed on or after CDK4/6i therapy.

Table 1. Efficacy Data by Expansion Arms

Citation Format: Robert Wesolowski, Hope Rugo, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Hyo S. Han, Jennifer M. Specht, E. Claire Dees, Peter Kabos, Ulka Vaishampayan, Seth A. Wander, Janice Lu, Keerthi Gogineni, Alexander I. Spira, Anne F. Schott, Maysa Abu-Khalaf, Pratima Nayak, Brian F. Sullivan, Igor Gorbatchevsky, AND Rachel M. Layman. PD13-05 Updated results of a Phase 1b study of gedatolisib plus palbociclib and endocrine therapy in women with hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer: Subgroup analysis by PIK3CA mutation status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-05.

Abstract OT3-09-01: Clinical Trial of Alpelisib and Tucatinib in Patients with PIK3CA-Mutant HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway plays a key role in resistance to the drugs targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Activating mutations in the gene encoding alpha catalytic subunit of PI3K (PIK3CA) are present in approximately 30% of HER2+ tumors. PIK3CA mutations are linked to drug resistance and decreased survival in patients with HER2+ breast cancer. To overcome this resistance mechanism, we designed a phase IB/II clinical trial to evaluate the combination of HER2 small molecule inhibitor tucatinib with PI3K inhibitor alpelisib in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (NCT05230810). This multicenter clinical trial is conducted through the Academic Breast Cancer Consortium (ABRCC), with the University of Colorado Cancer Center as the lead site. Target enrollment: 40 patients. This is a run-in phase IB/roll-over phase II study. Phase IB will follow Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Interval design and enroll from 9 to 19 patients to find the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of tucatinib and alpelisib. From 21 to 31 patients will be enrolled in phase II part, for a total of 40 patients in the final efficacy analysis. Main inclusion criteria: 1. Women and men ≥ 18 years old 2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 3. Presence of activating PIK3CA mutation in the tumor 4. Patients with HR-/HER2+ or HR+/HER2+ breast cancer may enroll; ovarian suppression is mandatory for premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2+ disease 5. HR+/HER2+ patients should be agreeable to concomitant treatment with fulvestrant 6. Prior treatment with at least two FDA-approved HER2-targeted agents 7. Measurable or evaluable disease. Bone only disease is allowed. 8. Subjects with untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases not needing immediate local therapy, and subjects with previously treated stable or progressive brain metastases may enroll, provided that there is no indication for immediate re-treatment. For patients with treated CNS metastases: time from treatment of CNS disease until the first dose of study drugs should be as follows: WBRT ≥ 21 days, surgical resection ≥ 14 days, SRS ≥ 7 days. 9. Adequate organ and marrow function Main exclusion criteria: 1. Contraindications to undergo contrast brain MRI 2. Leptomeningeal disease 3. Poorly controlled seizures 4. Diabetes mellitus type I, or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus type II 5. Acute pancreatitis within 1 year of screening, or history of chronic pancreatitis 6. History of severe cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions 7. Toxicities of prior cancer therapies that have not resolved to grade 1 or less, except peripheral neuropathy, which must have resolved to grade 2 or less, and alopecia 8. Previous treatment with EGFR or HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or PI3K/mTOR/AKT inhibitors. 9. Systemic anti-cancer therapy, palliative radiation to extracranial sites, or surgery within 2 weeks of the first dose of study drugs 10. Active bacterial, fungal, or viral infections, hepatitis B, C, or HIV 11. Clinically significant cardio-vascular disease Primary objectives: • Phase IB: safety and tolerability of combination therapy • Phase II: efficacy by progression free survival Exploratory assessment of biomarkers will be performed in the liquid biopsy samples. Study contact: Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD, elena.shagisultanova@cuanschutz.edu

Citation Format: Elena Shagisultanova, Kari B. Wisinski, Chelsea D. Gawryletz, Farrah M. Datko, Diana Medgyesy, Jennifer R. Diamond, Virginia F. Borges, Peter Kabos. Clinical Trial of Alpelisib and Tucatinib in Patients with PIK3CA-Mutant HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-09-01.

Abstract GS5-07: Estradiol represses anti-tumoral immune response to promote progression of triple-negative breast cancer brain metastases

Background: Younger women with breast cancer have increased risk of development of brain metastases irrespective of the tumor subtype. We have shown that pre-menopausal levels of 17-β-Estradiol (E2) contributes to the promotion of brain metastases by influencing the tumor microenvironment. E2 promotes brain metastasis (BM) of estrogen receptor negative (ER¯) BC cells by inducing neuroinflammatory ER+ astrocytes in the brain niche to secrete pro-metastatic factors critical for early brain colonization. Ovarieoctomy (OVX) in combination with the aromatase inhibitor (Letrozole) prevented brain colonization of triple negative (TNBC) (ER-PR-HER2-) human xenografts (MDA231BR/NSG) and murine models (E0711/C57Bl6, 4T1/BALBc) through paracrine activation of EGFR and TRKB, pathways involved in increased invasion and early tumor initiation. Yet, the extent to which E2-depletion therapies can decrease progression of established BM in combination with current standard of care for brain metastasis remains unknown. Goal: Current standard of care (SOC) for patients with TNBC brain metastasis includes irradiation (SRS, whole brain) and immunotherapy (PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors). The goal of this study was to assess how E2-depletion therapies affects brain immune function in the context of SOC for brain metastatic progression of TNBC. Results: To assess whether E2-depletion could decrease BM progression in a model that mimics standard of care for BM, TNBC E0771-GFP-luc cells were injected intracardially in syngeneic ovariectomized (OVX)-female C57Bl6 mice supplemented with pre-menopausal levels of E2. Seven days after injection (when cancer cells have colonized), mice received a single 15Gy dose brain irradiation and were randomized to continue receiving E2, E2 withdrawal (E2WD) or E2WD plus the aromatase-inhibitor letrozole (E2WD+LET). Brain metastatic burden significantly decreased in E2WD and E2WD+Letrozole treated mice as compared to E2-treated mice. Injection of E0711 cells in immunocompromised NSG mice or in the absence of brain irradiation abolished this effect, suggesting that E2-depletion therapies decrease BM progression through boosting radiation-induced anti-tumor immunity. Accordingly, there were no differences in BM progression in E2, E2WD or E2WD+let treated mice in a xenograft model (F2-7 TNBC cells) in NSG mice, even in the presence of brain irradiation. Immune-profiling of brains from OVX+E2, OVX and OVX+Let C57BL6 mice carrying BMs showed dynamic changes in immune populations at early and late stages of brain metastatic colonization. At early stages post brain colonization (3 days post ic injection) E2-treated mice showed a decreased fraction of CD11b+CD45Int CD206+ microglia/CNS macrophages as compared to OVX+LET-treated mice, without significant changes in the fraction of infiltrated lymphocytes, suggesting E2 represses early immunosurveillance through repression of microglia/CNS macrophage activation. At later stages of brain colonization (7 days post ic injection), E2-treated mice showed an increased fraction of proinflammatory microglia and decreased fraction of T and B cells as compared to OVX or OVX+let treated mice. While E2-depletion increased the recruitment of T cells to the brain niche, the fraction of CD279 (PD1+) brain T cells was similar among groups. Ongoing studies assess the efficacy of E2-depletion therapies in combination with brain radiation and PD-1 inhibitors to decrease metastatic burden and improve survival in preclinical models. Conclusion: Our results support the hypothesis that estradiol promotes brain metastatic progression by stimulating an immunosuppressive brain microenvironment. As such, FDA-approved E2-depletion therapies (aromatase inhibitors and selective-estrogen modulators) could be used in combination with brain irradiation and PD-1 inhibitors to promote a more effective anti-tumoral immune response.

Citation Format: Diana Cittelly, Maria J. Contreras-Zarate, Karen ALvarez-Eraso, Vesna Tesic, Nicole Tsuji, Leanna Chafee, Sana Karam, D. Ryan Ormond, Peter Kabos. Estradiol represses anti-tumoral immune response to promote progression of triple-negative breast cancer brain metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-07.

Abstract P1-10-09: AQP4 inhibition prevents cytotoxic edema of AQP4+ astrocytes but promotes tumor growth of AQP4+ breast cancer brain metastasis

Brain edema is a complication of radiation used to treat brain metastasis (BM) in which the brain parenchyma accumulates fluid and ions, often leading to the suspension of systemic anticancer treatment. While brain edema is often attributed to disruption of the Blood Brain Barrier (BBB), RTx induces cytotoxic-edema, a premorbid cellular process whereby extracellular Na+ and other cations enter into neurons and astrocytes and accumulate intracellularly, resulting in osmotic expansion of the cells and necrotic cell death. Aquaporin 4 (AQP4) is a main regulator of osmotic expansion (water intake) in astrocytes and we have shown that RTx upregulates AQP4 in astrocytes and leads to astrocytic swelling in vitro. However, whether pharmacological modulation of AQP4 could be used to prevent cytotoxic brain edema in RTx-treated BM and its impact on metastatic tumor progression remains unknown. Goal: To determine if the FDA-approved drug Topiramate (TPM), an anti-epileptic drug able to inhibit AQP4) can prevent astrocytic swelling in vitro, reduce RTx-induced brain edema and modulate brain metastatic progression. Results: Electron microscopy of brain cortex from mice treated with 35 Gy RTx showed acute astrocytic end-feet swelling and increase in AQP4 expression compared with non-irradiated mice. A single 8 Gy dose increased astrocytic cell area of human astrocytes by 4.8 fold compared with non-irradiated cells 24 h after RTx. This increased cell-swelling did not result from senescence-associated cellular hypertrophy, as staining of senescent β-galactosidase positive (SA-β-Gal+) cells showed that Rtx-induced astrocytic area only increased significantly in non-senescent (SA-β-Gal- cells). shAQP4s reduced AQP4 levels by 60% and 50%, respectively, and significantly reduced RTx-induced astrocytic swelling. Since there are no FDA-approved AQP4 inhibitors, we tested whether the AQP4-blocking function of TPM could be sufficient to prevent cytotoxic edema, prevent BBB dysfunction and protect from necrotic cell death in vitro. TPM pretreatment did not alter radiation-induced ERK1/2 or AKT activation (a known maker of radioprotection) in astrocytes, but TPM decreased radiation-induced PARP-cleavage, pP38 and pJNK levels. TPM prevented loss of Trans-electric epithelial resistance (TEER) of Rtx-treated astrocytes, but was not able to protect astrocytes from ultimate cell death. Immunohistochemical analysis of a cohort of breast cancer BM showed heterogeneous AQP4 expression in cancer cells ranging from 1.6% to 91% AQP4+ tumoral areas and from 0.6% to 86.9% in stroma. AQP4 inhibition using shRNAs decreased proliferation and survival of AQP4 + 231BR, and EO711 cells in vitro. However, TPM did not alter survival of AQP4+ or AQP4- cells in vitro, suggesting that while AQP4 expression is important for survival of AQP4+ cells in vitro, the inhibition of AQP4 function by TPM is not sufficient to decrease their growth. To determine if TPM could decrease brain edema without negatively impacting tumor progression, female NSG mice were injected intracardially with JmT1BR3 AQP4-cells and ten days later randomized to (1) RTx + vehicle, (2) RTx + TPM (2 days prior to irradiation), (3) Non-RTx + vehicle, and (4) Non-RTx + TPM. TPM decreased brain-water content (a marker of brain edema) in irradiated mice as compared with vehicle-treated mice, without alteration of metastatic burden 21 days post-injection. However, a similar study using AQP4+ E0711 cells in C57Bl6 mice showed TPM was less effective in decreasing brain water content and resulted in a significant increase in extracranial metastatic tumor burden, suggesting that TPM can promote tumor progression by non-tumor intrinsic mechanisms. Conclusions: while TPM shows promise in preventing RTx-induced brain edema, our results show a potential pro-tumorigenic mechanism for TPM that warrants further investigation.

Citation Format: Maria J. Contreras-Zarate, Karen ALvarez-Eraso, Nicole Tsuji, Peter Kabos, D.Ryan Ormond, Sana Karam, Diana Cittelly. AQP4 inhibition prevents cytotoxic edema of AQP4+ astrocytes but promotes tumor growth of AQP4+ breast cancer brain metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-09.

Abstract P3-07-28: SERENA-1: Updated analyses from a Phase 1 study of the next generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader camizestrant (AZD9833) combined with abemaciclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

Background: SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is a Phase 1, multi-part, open-label study of camizestrant in women with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer. Parts A/B and C/D (escalation/expansion) examined camizestrant as monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib respectively and have been presented previously.1,2 Here we present data from parts G/H which examined camizestrant in combination with abemaciclib. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of camizestrant 75 mg once daily (QD) in combination with abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily (BID). Secondary objectives included investigation of anti-tumor response and pharmacokinetics (PK). Participants were previously treated women of any menopausal status (pre-menopausal women received this combination alongside ongoing ovarian function suppressors). Prior treatment with ≤2 lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting was permitted. There was no limit on the number of lines of prior endocrine treatment in the advanced setting; previous treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and fulvestrant was permitted. Results: As of 1st June 2022, 24 patients had received camizestrant in combination with abemaciclib with a median 7.7 month follow up. Tolerability of the combination of camizestrant and abemaciclib was consistent with that of each drug individually. No patient required camizestrant dose reduction. All camizestrant-related heart rate decreases were Grade 1 (asymptomatic). PK data for camizestrant in combination with abemaciclib were consistent with camizestrant as monotherapy and published abemaciclib steady-state PK data, indicating no clinically relevant drug-drug interaction. In these heavily pre-treated patients (46% prior chemotherapy, 75% prior CDK4/6i, 54% prior fulvestrant; all in the advanced disease setting) and of whom 67% had visceral metastases, the objective response rate was 5/19 (26.3%), the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks was 16/24 (66.7%) and the median progression-free survival had not been reached, with 8/24 patients experiencing a progression event. These data support the use of camizestrant 75 mg QD combined with the approved abemaciclib dose. Conclusions: Camizestrant 75 mg QD in combination with abemaciclib 150 mg BID was well tolerated with encouraging clinical activity. The inclusion of this regimen in the ongoing Phase 3, SERENA-6 trial 3, of camizestrant combined with CDK4/6i versus an aromatase inhibitor, will further clarify the role of this combination in the treatment of patients with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer with tumors expressing ESR1 mutations. References 1. Baird R, Oliveira M, Ciruelos Gil EM, et al. SABCS 2020 Virtual Meeting. Abstract PS11-05. 2. Oliveira M, Hamilton EP, Incorvati J, et al. J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 1032). 3. SERENA-6 trial. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04964934 We acknowledge Helen Heffron, PhD, from InterComm International who provided medical writing support funded by AstraZeneca.

Citation Format: Nicholas Turner, Christos Vaklavas, Emiliano Calvo, Javier Garcia-Corbacho, Jason Incorvati, Manuel Ruiz Borrego, Chris Twelves, Anne Armstrong, Begoña Bermejo, Erika Hamilton, Mafalda Oliveira, Eva Ciruelos, Peter Kabos, Manish R Patel, Maria Borrell, Howard Burris, Bruno de Paula, Alejandro Falcon, Cristina Hernando, Irene Moreno, Ciara S. O’Brien, Elena Shagisultanova, Ivan Victoria Ruiz, Judy S. Wang, Mei Wei, Tim Brier, Danielle Carroll, Carmela Ciardullo, Lisa Gibbons, itziar irurzun-Arana, Tony Jack, bistra kirova, Teresa Klinowska, Justin Lindemann, Julie Maidment, Alastair Mathewson, Rhiannon Maudsley, Robert McEwen, Christopher Morrow, Andy Sykes, Richard D. Baird. SERENA-1: Updated analyses from a Phase 1 study of the next generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader camizestrant (AZD9833) combined with abemaciclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-28.

Abstract P3-07-13: The next generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) camizestrant (AZD9833) is active against wild type and mutant estrogen receptor α

Endocrine therapy forms the backbone treatment for patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are the most common endocrine treatment option. Mutation of ESR1, the gene encoding ERα, is a common mechanism of resistance to AIs which leads to ligand independent activity of ERα. Camizestrant (AZD9833) is a next generation SERD and pure ER antagonist that is in Phase 3 trials (SERENA-4: NCT04711252; SERENA-6: NCT04964934). Here we report the preclinical and clinical activity of camizestrant in patients with ESR1 wild-type (ESR1wt) and mutant (ESR1m) tumors. The binding affinities of camizestrant, fulvestrant, and estradiol to wt ERα and ERα variants with mutations in the ligand binding domain were assessed. All three compounds exhibited reduced binding to mutant forms of ERα compared with wt ERα; the Y537S mutation had the greatest impact on binding. This was reflected in requirement for greater concentrations of camizestrant and fulvestrant to degrade and antagonize mutated ERα and to impact cellular proliferation in MCF-7 cells that expressed Y537S ESR1m compared to ESR1wt MCF-7 cells. Furthermore, while a 3 mg/kg dose of camizestrant achieved a maximal anti-tumor effect in a ESR1wt patient derived xenograft model, a 10 mg/kg was required for maximal effect in a D538G ESR1m model. Considering this difference between ESR1m and ESR1wt, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of preclinical data predicted that a camizestrant dose of 75 mg would be maximally efficacious in patients with ESR1m tumors. Indeed, analysis of ESR1m circulating tumor DNA levels in patients from the SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) Phase 1 trial showed a clear effect of 14 days treatment with 75 mg camizestrant resulting in a &gt;2-fold reduction in ESR1m variant allele frequency in 12/13 (92%) cases with complete clearance of ESR1m ctDNA in 7/13 (54%) cases. Interestingly, the clinical activity of camizestrant was higher in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer with ESR1m tumors compared to those with no detectable mutation (ESR1m not detected). At a camizestrant dose of 75 mg, median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (maturity 12/15) in patients with ESR1m tumors compared to 5.6 months (8/9) in those with ESR1m not detected (data cut-off 6 October 2021). Camizestrant-induced ERα degradation was seen in both groups (mean reduction in H-score 42% in ESR1m tumors (n= 12 evaluable pairs) and 46% in tumors with ESR1m not detected (n=7)). Whole transcriptome analysis revealed a trend towards higher ERα activity at baseline in ESR1m tumors compared to ESR1m not detected; ERα activity reduced on treatment in both groups. Consistent with the clinical activity data, camizestrant induced more profound reductions in cell proliferation in ESR1m tumors compared to ESR1m not detected tumors (as seen by greater reductions in Ki67-positive tumor cells). These data demonstrate the activity of camizestrant in patients with ESR1m tumors. Clinical activity along with degradation and antagonism of the ERα is also seen in patients with tumors in which ESR1 mutations are not detected. In this heavily pre-treated Phase 1 patient population from SERENA-1, ESR1m may be a predictive biomarker to enrich for patients with maintained endocrine sensitivity. The SERENA-6 trial is investigating the efficacy and safety of camizestrant plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor in patients with metastatic breast cancer and detectable ESR1m. We acknowledge Helen Heffron, PhD, from InterComm International who provided medical writing support funded by AstraZeneca.

Citation Format: Christopher Morrow, Larissa Carnevalli, Richard D. Baird, Tim Brier, Carmela Ciardullo, Natalie Cureton, Mandy Lawson, Robert McEwen, Myria Nikolaou, Anne Armstrong, Begoña Bermejo, Emiliano Calvo, Eva Ciruelos, Javier Garcia-Corbacho, Erika Hamilton, Jason Incorvati, Peter Kabos, Mafalda Oliveira, Manish R Patel, Manuel Ruiz-Borregó, Nicholas Turner, Chris Twelves, Christos Vaklavas, Danielle Carroll, Steven Ching, Nevena Cvetesic, Michelle DuPont, Lisa Gibbons, Alastair Mathewson, Rhiannon Maudsley, Pablo Morentin Gutierrez, Avinash Reddy, Jaime Rodriguez-Canales, Susana Ros, Dhivya Sudhan, Andy Sykes, David Whitson, Teresa Klinowska, Justin Lindemann. The next generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) camizestrant (AZD9833) is active against wild type and mutant estrogen receptor α [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-13.

Clinical outcomes of adjuvant taxane plus anthracycline versus taxane-based chemotherapy regimens in older adults with node-positive, triple-negative breast cancer: A SEER-Medicare study

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer associated with an aggressive clinical course. Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces the risk of recurrence and improves survival in patients with node-positive TNBC. The benefit of anthracycline plus taxane (ATAX) regimens compared with non-anthracycline-containing, taxane-based regimens (TAX) in older women with node-positive TNBC is not well characterised.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, we identified 1106 women with node-positive TNBC diagnosed at age 66 years and older between 2010 and 2015. We compared patient clinical characteristics according to adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy and ATAX versus TAX). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to estimate 3-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyse OS and CSS while controlling for patient and tumour characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 1106 patients in our cohort, 767 (69.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy with ATAX (364/767, 47.5%), TAX (297/767, 39%) or other regimens (106/767, 13.8%). Independent predictors of which patients were more likely to receive ATAX versus TAX included more extensive nodal involvement (≥4), age, marital/partner status and non-cardiac comorbidities. There was a statistically significant improvement in 3-year CSS (81.8% versus 71.4%) and OS (70.7% versus 51.3%) with the use of any chemotherapy in our cohort (P < 0.01). Three-year CSS and OS for patients who received ATAX versus TAX were similar at 82.8% versus 83.7% (P = 0.80) and 74.2% versus 72.7% (P = 0.79), respectively. There was a trend towards improved CSS and OS in patients with four or more positive lymph nodes who received ATAX versus TAX (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI: 0.36-1.23, P = 0.19 and hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI: 0.41-1.14, P = 0.14, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Among older women with node-positive TNBC, a majority of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, which was associated with an improvement in CSS and OS. When compared with TAX chemotherapy, there was a trend towards better outcomes with ATAX for patients with ≥4 nodes.

Short-term Topiramate treatment prevents radiation-induced cytotoxic edema in preclinical models of breast-cancer brain metastasis

Background

Brain edema is a common complication of brain metastases (BM) and associated treatment. The extent to which cytotoxic edema, the first step in the sequence that leads to ionic edema, vasogenic edema and brain swelling, contributes to radiation-induced brain edema during BM remains unknown. This study aimed to determine whether radiation-associated treatment of BM induces cytotoxic edema and the consequences of blocking the edema in pre-clinical models of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM).

Methods

Using in vitro and in vivo models, we measured astrocytic swelling, trans-electric resistance (TEER) and aquaporin 4 (AQP4) expression following radiation. Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of AQP4 in astrocytes and cancer cells was used to assess the role of AQP4 in astrocytic swelling and brain water intake. An anti-epileptic drug that blocks AQP4 function (topiramate) was used to prevent cytotoxic edema in models of BM.

Results

Radiation-induced astrocytic swelling and transient upregulation of AQP4 within the first 24 hours following radiation. Topiramate decreased radiation-induced astrocytic swelling, loss of TEER in astrocytes in vitro , and acute short term treatment (but not continuous administration), prevented radiation-induced increase in brain water content without pro-tumorigenic effects in multiple pre-clinical models of BCBM. AQP4 was expressed in clinical BM and breast cancer cell lines, but AQP4 targeting had limited direct pro-tumorigenic or radioprotective effects in cancer cells that could impact its clinical translation.

Conclusions

Patients with BM could find additional benefits from acute and temporary preventive treatment of radiation-induced cytotoxic edema using anti-epileptic drugs able to block AQP4 function.

Key points

Radiation induces cytotoxic edema via acute dysregulation of AQP4 in astrocytes in preclinical models of BM. Pharmacologic blockage of AQP4 function prevents water intake, astrocytic swelling and restores TEER in vitro. Pre-treatment with single-dose Topiramate prevents brain radiation-induced brain edema without direct tumor effects in pre-clinical models of BCBM.

IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY

In this study we describe a novel role for astrocytic swelling and cytotoxic edema in the progression of radiation-induced brain edema during BM treatment. While radiation-induced edema has been fully attributed to the disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and ensuing vasogenic effects, our results suggest that cytotoxic edema affecting astrocytes in the acute setting plays an important role in the progression of brain edema during BM standard of care. Current standard of care for brain edema involves pre-treatment with steroids and the use of bevacizumab only after clinically significant edema develops. Both interventions are presumed to target vasogenic edema. This study suggests that patients with BM could find additional benefits from acute and temporary preventive treatment of radiation-induced cytotoxic edema using an already FDA-approved anti-epileptic drug. Such early prevention strategy can be easily clinically implemented with the goal of minimizing treatment-related toxicities.

Cytokeratins 5 and 17 Maintain an Aggressive Epithelial State in Basal-Like Breast Cancer

Basal-like breast cancers (BLBC) are the most common triple-negative subtype (hormone receptor and HER2 negative) with poor short-term disease outcome and are commonly identified by expression of basal cytokeratins (CK) 5 and 17. The goal of this study was to investigate whether CK5 and CK17 play a role in adverse behavior of BLBC cells. BLBC cell lines contain heterogeneous populations of cells expressing CK5, CK17, and the mesenchymal filament protein vimentin. Stable shRNA knockdown of either CK5 or CK17 compared with non-targeting control in BLBC cells was sufficient to promote an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) gene signature with loss of E-cadherin and an increase in vimentin expression. Relative to control cells, CK5 and CK17 knockdown cells acquired a more spindle-like morphology with increased cell scattering and were more invasive in vitro. However, CK5 or CK17 knockdown compared with control cells generated decreased lymph node and lung metastases in vivo. Loss of CK5 or CK17 moderately reduced the IC50 dose of doxorubicin in vitro and led to increased doxorubicin efficacy in vivo. Single-cell RNA-sequencing of BLBC patient-derived xenografts identified heterogeneous populations of CK5/CK17, vimentin, and dual basal CK/vimentin-positive cells that fell on an EMT spectrum of epithelial, mesenchymal, and intermediate, respectively, whereas knockdown of CK5 transitioned cells toward a more mesenchymal score.

IMPLICATIONS

This study supports that basal CKs 5 and 17 contribute to the adverse behavior of BLBC cells and could be an untapped source of therapeutic vulnerability for this aggressive disease.

Transcription factor-nucleosome dynamics from plasma cfDNA identifies ER-driven states in breast cancer

Genome-wide binding profiles of estrogen receptor (ER) and FOXA1 reflect cancer state in ER+ breast cancer. However, routine profiling of tumor transcription factor (TF) binding is impractical in the clinic. Here, we show that plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) contains high-resolution ER and FOXA1 tumor binding profiles for breast cancer. Enrichment of TF footprints in plasma reflects the binding strength of the TF in originating tissue. We defined pure in vivo tumor TF signatures in plasma using ER+ breast cancer xenografts, which can distinguish xenografts with distinct ER states. Furthermore, state-specific ER-binding signatures can partition human breast tumors into groups with significantly different ER expression and mortality. Last, TF footprints in human plasma samples can identify the presence of ER+ breast cancer. Thus, plasma TF footprints enable minimally invasive mapping of the regulatory landscape of breast cancer in humans and open vast possibilities for clinical applications across multiple tumor types.

BSCI-18 ESTROGEN-DEPLETION DECREASES PROGRESSION OF ER¯ BRAIN METASTASES BY PROMOTING AN ANTI-TUMORAL LOCAL IMMUNE RESPONSE

We have shown that 17-β-Estradiol (E2) promotes brain metastasis (BM) of estrogen receptor negative (ER¯) BC cells by inducing neuroinflammatory ER+ astrocytes in the brain niche to secrete pro-metastatic factors critical for early brain colonization. E2-depletion prevented brain colonization of human xenografts (MDA231BR/NSG) and syngeneic (E0711/C57Bl6, 4T1/Balb-c) ER¯ models. Yet, whether E2-depletion can be used to decrease progression of established BM and how E2-dependent modulation of brain immune response contributes to the pro-metastatic effects of E2 remains unclear. To assess whether E2-depletion could decrease BM progression in a model that mimics standard of care for BM, E0771-GFP-luc cells were injected intracardially in syngeneic ovariectomized (OVX)-female C57Bl6 mice supplemented with E2. Seven days after injection (when micrometastases are established), mice received a single 15Gy dose brain irradiation and were randomized to continue receiving E2, E2 withdrawal (E2WD) or E2WD plus the aromatase-inhibitor letrozole (EWD+LET). Endpoint BM (but not systemic metastases) were significantly decreased in E2WD+Letrozole treated mice as compared to E2-treated mice. This effect was abolished when E0711 cells were injected in severely immunocompromised NSG mice or in the absence of brain irradiation, suggesting EWD+LET decreases BM progression through boosting radiation-induced anti-tumor immunity. Accordingly, there were no differences in BM progression in E2, EWD or E2WD+let treated mice in a xenograft model (F2-7 TNBC cells) in NSG mice, even in the presence of brain irradiation. Brain immune-profiling of brain irradiated E2, EWD and EWD+Let C57BL6 mice carrying E0771 BMs shows that brains of EWD+LET-treated mice had a significantly lower fraction of CD4 T cells and an increase in CD8 T cells, suggesting that EWD+letrozole decrease brain metastatic burden in part through modulation of T cells. These results suggest E2-depletion therapies could be used in combination with brain irradiation to decrease progression of BMs and promote an anti-tumoral immune response.

BSCI-17 TOPIRAMATE DECREASES RADIATION-INDUCED CYTOTOXIC EDEMA IN HER2+ BRAIN METASTASES VIA AQUAPORIN 4 INHIBITION

Brain metastasis (BM) occurs in 30-40 % of breast cancer patients with Her2+ tumors, and radiation is part of the standard treatment for BM. About 10% of BM patients treated with radiation develop brain edema. We have shown that combination of Ado-trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1)-the main targeted therapy for metastatic Her2+ Breast Cancer- and radiation increases the risk of developing radionecrosis by 13.5-fold (Stump et al., 2019). We also showed that T-DM1 enhances radiation-induced astrocytic toxicity and cytotoxic edema through upregulation of aquaporin-4 water-transporter (AQP4). Here, we determined whether blockage of AQP4 would prevent astrocytic swelling –cytotoxic edema- in vitro and in vivo models of Her2+ BM. Results: Electron microscopy of brain cortex from mice treated with 35 Gy (single dose), showed acute astrocytic end-feet swelling and a significant increase in AQP4 expression compared with non-irradiated mice. Consistent with prior findings in murine astrocytes, primary human astrocytes (huAST) also upregulated AQP4 levels 24 h post-radiation (8 Gy), and T-DM1 treatment exacerbated this effect. AQP4 upregulation was concomitant with 4.8 fold increase in the astrocytic area (indicative of cytotoxic edema). The FDA-approved anti-epileptic and migraine prevention drug, Topiramate (TPM), which works as an AQP4 inhibitor, blocked radiation-induced astrocytic swelling in huAST in vitro. Thus, we tested whether pre-treatment with TPM could prevent radiation-induced edema in a mouse model of HER2+BMs. Mice were injected intracardially JmT1BR3 brain metastatic cells and ten days later randomized based on the total head flux to (1) Radiation + vehicle, (2) Radiation + TPM (2 days prior to irradiation), (3) Non-Radiation + vehicle, and (4) Non-radiation + TPM. TPM decreased brain-water content (a marker of brain edema) in irradiated mice as compared with vehicle-treated mice, without alteration of metastatic burden 21 days post-injection. These results suggest TPM could be repurposed as a preventive agent of radiation-induced brain edema.

Abstract CT120: Phase II study of radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with PD-L1-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype lacking hormone receptor expression and HER2 over-expression. Metastatic TNBC has been difficult to treat due to a general lack of targeted therapies, however, immunotherapy has shown substantial activity in a subset of patients. In metastatic TNBC patients with PD-L1-positive (combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10) disease, KEYNOTE-355 demonstrated that addition of pembrolizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) to chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, or carboplatin/gemcitabine) prolonged median progression free survival (PFS) compared to chemotherapy alone (9.7 months vs 5.6 months). Median 1-year PFS was also increased from 12.0% to 39.1% in these patients treated with pembrolizumab. These data led to the FDA approval of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive metastatic TNBC patients. Despite these encouraging results, the majority of patients do not have long-term disease control. Radiotherapy (RT) in combination with immunotherapy and chemotherapy represents a promising avenue to prolong long-term response. RT can stimulate cellular damage and cause the release of tumor antigens, promoting a local T cell response. In addition, localized RT can result in the shrinkage of distant sites of metastasis via the abscopal effect when used with immunotherapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the benefit of combining RT with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with metastatic PD-L1-positive TNBC.

Methods: This two-stage, single-arm phase II study will assess the efficacy of RT in combination with nab-paclitaxel/paclitaxel plus pembrolizumab in PD-L1-positive unresectable or metastatic TNBC patients aged ≥18 years. To be included, patients must have only received &lt; 1 prior line of systemic therapy in the metastatic setting or adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting if metastatic recurrence was within 12 months of treatment. The primary endpoint of the study is the 1-year PFS rate and a total of 29 subjects will be enrolled. Patients will be treated first with RT followed by the initiation of systemic therapy within seven days. Ablative RT will be directed at 1-4 sites of metastatic disease in 3 fractions of 8 Gy each. Nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel will be given weekly day 1, day 8 every 3 weeks and pembrolizumab will be given every 3 weeks. Imaging will be repeated every 9 weeks to assess response based on RECIST 1.1. Systemic treatment will be continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Treatment beyond progression will be allowed in certain patients who had initial response followed by progression. In these patients, repeat RT to new sites of disease can be administered with continuation of pembrolizumab to investigate the potential of re-sensitizing patients to immunotherapy. Blood will be collected before and after treatment for immune profiling. The sample size was determined using a null hypothesis for the 1-year PFS rate of 39% and an alternate hypothesis of 60%. The sample size of 29 yields a power of 80% to detect this difference with an alpha of 0.1 (1-sided). An interim analysis will be performed after enrollment of seventeen subjects in stage one.

Citation Format: Anna R. Schreiber, Jodi Kagihara, Andrew Nicklawsky, Dexiang Gao, Anosheh Afghahi, Anthony Elias, Peter Kabos, Elena Shagisultanova, Todd Pitts, Julie Lang, Sana Karam, Virginia Borges, Christine Fisher, Jennifer R. Diamond. Phase II study of radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with PD-L1-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT120.

Serena-1: Updated analyses from a phase 1 study (parts C/D) of the next-generation oral SERD camizestrant (AZD9833) in combination with palbociclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

1032

Background: SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is a Phase 1, multi-part, open-label study of camizestrant in women with ER+, HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC). Parts A/B (escalation/expansion) assessed camizestrant monotherapy and have been presented previously. Parts C/D examine camizestrant in combination with palbociclib; here we present mature data from camizestrant 75 mg in combination with palbociclib; 75 mg being the camizestrant dose currently under investigation in the Phase 3 studies SERENA-4 (NCT04711252) and SERENA-6 (NCT04964934). Methods: The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of camizestrant once daily (QD) with palbociclib. Secondary objectives included anti-tumor response and pharmacokinetics (PK). Prior treatment with < 2 lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting was permitted. There was no limit on the number of lines of prior endocrine treatment in the advanced setting; prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors and fulvestrant (F) was permitted. Results: As of 9 September 2021, 25 patients had received camizestrant 75 mg QD in combination with palbociclib. Tolerability of the combination of camizestrant 75 mg and palbociclib was consistent with that of each drug individually. No patient required camizestrant dose interruption/reduction/discontinuation due to a camizestrant-related adverse event (AE); moreover, none experienced a Grade ≥3 camizestrant-related AE. All camizestrant-related heart rate reductions were Grade 1 (asymptomatic). All camizestrant-related visual effects were Grade 1 (mild), apart from one patient who experienced transient Grade 2 (moderate) visual effects that resolved to Grade 1 without dose modification. Camizestrant-related gastrointestinal disorders were all Grade 1, except one instance of Grade 2 nausea lasting one day. PK data for camizestrant 75 mg QD and palbociclib combined were broadly consistent with camizestrant as monotherapy and published palbociclib steady-state PK data, further supporting the use of camizestrant 75 mg QD (Phase 3 dose) in combination with the approved palbociclib doses. In these heavily pre-treated patients (48% prior chemotherapy, 80% prior CDK4/6i, 68% prior F; all in advanced disease setting) and of whom 60% had visceral metastases, the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks was 7/25 (28%). Conclusions: The PK and safety profile of camizestrant 75 mg QD in combination with palbociclib is favorable in this mature Phase 1 dataset. Despite extensive pre-treatment - including chemotherapies, CDK4/6i, and F - camizestrant 75 mg QD in combination with palbociclib exhibits encouraging clinical activity. The results from the ongoing Phase 3 studies, SERENA-4 and SERENA-6, will further elucidate the role of this combination in the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2− ABC. Clinical trial information: NCT03616587.

Estrogens and Progestins Cooperatively Shift Breast Cancer Cell Metabolism

Metabolic reprogramming remains largely understudied in relation to hormones in estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive breast cancer. In this study, we investigated how estrogens, progestins, or the combination, impact metabolism in three ER and PR positive breast cancer cell lines. We measured metabolites in the treated cells using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS). Top metabolic processes upregulated with each treatment involved glucose metabolism, including Warburg effect/glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and the pentose phosphate pathway. RNA-sequencing and pathway analysis on two of the cell lines treated with the same hormones, found estrogens target oncogenes, such as MYC and PI3K/AKT/mTOR that control tumor metabolism, while progestins increased genes associated with fatty acid metabolism, and the estrogen/progestin combination additionally increased glycolysis. Phenotypic analysis of cell energy metabolism found that glycolysis was the primary hormonal target, particularly for the progestin and estrogen-progestin combination. Transmission electron microscopy found that, compared to vehicle, estrogens elongated mitochondria, which was reversed by co-treatment with progestins. Progestins promoted lipid storage both alone and in combination with estrogen. These findings highlight the shift in breast cancer cell metabolism to a more glycolytic and lipogenic phenotype in response to combination hormone treatment, which may contribute to a more metabolically adaptive state for cell survival.

Abstract OT2-11-04: Ameera-1 Arm 5: Phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859), an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), with abemaciclib in postmenopausal women with ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer

Background Endocrine therapy in combination with a targeted cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor is the clinical standard for treatment of ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. Amcenestrant (SAR439859) is an optimized oral SERD with potent dual activity that antagonizes and degrades the ER, resulting in inhibition of the ER signaling pathway. In previous arms of the AMEERA-1 study, amcenestrant, as monotherapy or in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, demonstrated antitumor activity and a favorable safety profile in postmenopausal women with heavily pretreated ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. The objective of Arm 5 of the AMEERA-1 study is to evaluate safety and antitumor activity of amcenestrant in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib for patients with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. Methods AMEERA-1 (NCT03284957) is an open-label, non-comparative, dose escalation and dose expansion Phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant as monotherapy, then in combination with other anti-cancer targeted therapies. Arm 5 investigates dose escalation (Part J) and dose expansion (Part K), of amcenestrant in combination with abemaciclib. Postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, ECOG performance status 0-1, and ≥ 6 months prior endocrine therapy are eligible. In Arm 5 (Parts J and K), ≤ 1 prior line of a single endocrine therapy for advanced disease is allowed. Prior treatment with fulvestrant or any other SERD is not allowed; in addition, prior therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors for advanced disease is not allowed. Part J allows ≤ 1 prior chemotherapy for advanced disease, while prior chemotherapy for advanced disease is not allowed in Part K. Additional exclusion criteria in Arm 5 are prior drugs targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase axis; history of or concurrent pneumonitis; and history of or concurrent venous thromboembolism (i.e., deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or cerebral venous sinus thrombosis). Part J evaluates the selected amcenestrant dose for combination therapy plus abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily (BID) (the approved standard dose) or abemaciclib 100 mg BID, taken in 28-day cycles. Additional dose levels of amcenestrant may be explored based on safety and pharmacokinetics (PK). The objective of Part J is to determine the recommended dose (RD) of abemaciclib in combination with the selected amcenestrant dose for combination therapy, based on preliminary safety, PK, and antitumor activity data. The primary endpoint in Part J is the incidence of treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at Cycle 1. Approximately up to 12 DLT-evaluable patients will be needed to establish the RD of abemaciclib in combination with amcenestrant in Part J. In Part K, approximately 20 patients will be treated at the RD of abemaciclib for combination therapy with amcenestrant, the primary endpoint being safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints include PK and antitumor activity. Funding: Sanofi.

Citation Format: Mario Campone, Sarat Chandarlapaty, Aditya Bardia, Patrick Neven, Katarina Petrakova, Peter Kabos, Valentina Boni, Sofia Braga, Marina Celanovic, Patrick Cohen, Alice Gosselin, Sylvaine Cartot-Cotton, Vasiliki Pelekanou, Hannah Linden. Ameera-1 Arm 5: Phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859), an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), with abemaciclib in postmenopausal women with ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-11-04.

Abstract P1-17-11: Updated data from AMEERA-1: Phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859), an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), combined with palbociclib in postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer

Background: In Arm 2 of the ongoing AMEERA-1 trial (NCT03284957), amcenestrant, an optimized oral SERD combined with the CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) palbociclib demonstrated favorable safety and encouraging antitumor activity among patients with endocrine-resistant ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer in dose escalation (Part C) and dose expansion (Part D) (Chandarlapaty et al., ASCO 2021; abstract 1058). Here we report an update of safety, antitumor activity data, and progression-free survival (PFS), of amcenestrant 200 mg in combination with palbociclib. Analysis of genomic data, including modulation over time and correlation with clinical outcome, will also be presented. Methods: The trial enrolled postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- locally-advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression while on ≥ 6 months of prior endocrine therapy (ET) in the advanced setting, or who relapsed on adjuvant ET after the first 2 years of treatment or within 12 months of completing adjuvant ET. Prior chemotherapy (≤ 1) was allowed as well as prior CDK4/6i-based therapy (≤ 1, in Part C only). In this pooled analysis (N = 39), patients in Parts C + D received amcenestrant 200 mg once daily + palbociclib 125 mg (21 days on/7 days off), administered in 28-day cycles. Safety in the pooled analysis was reported using methods previously described (Chandarlapaty et al., ASCO 2021; abstract 1058). Data from investigator-assessed, response-evaluable patients in the pooled analysis without prior exposure to targeted therapies (N = 34) were used to evaluate antitumor activity per RECIST v1.1, including the objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and PFS. Results: At a data cutoff of May 30, 2021, in the pooled analysis (N = 39), the median (range) duration of treatment exposure was 44.3 weeks (1-80). Of 39 patients, 24 (61.5%) had initiated at least 10 cycles (40 weeks) of treatment, with 20/39 (51.3%) still receiving ongoing treatment. Among the 34/39 (87.2%) patients in the response-evaluable population, median follow-up was 48.3 weeks with a PFS probability of being event free at 24 weeks of 78.2% (95% CI: 59.6%; 89.0%). Median PFS is not yet mature, with 14/34 (41.2%) patients having had a PFS event (all were progression events and no deaths occurred). The ORR was 11/34 (32.4%; all partial responses). Clinical benefit at 24 weeks was seen in 25/34 (CBR = 73.5%) patients. Median (range) time to first response was 16.3 weeks (8-32). Amcenestrant treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and palbociclib TRAEs, respectively, occurred in 27/39 (69.2%) and 35/39 (89.7%) patients for all grade events and in 5/39 (12.8%) and 18/39 (46.2%) patients for Grade ≥ 3 events. Non-hematological amcenestrant and palbociclib TRAEs are reported in Table 1. Neutrophil count decrease based on hematological laboratory abnormalities was observed in the majority of patients (94.9%; with Grade ≥ 3 in 56.4%).

Conclusions: Among postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, amcenestrant 200 mg in combination with the approved dose of palbociclib continues to demonstrate encouraging long-term antitumor activity, sustained clinical benefit, and a favorable safety profile consistent with previous results. Funding: Sanofi.

Table 1.Non-hematological amcenestrant and palbociclib TRAEs occurring in &gt; 10% of patientsPooled Analysis. Amcenestrant 200 mg + Palbociclib. (Parts C + D; N = 39)Amcenestrant Non-hematological TRAEs, n (%)All GradesGrade ≥ 3–Fatigue7 (17.9)0–Nausea7 (17.9)0–Arthralgia4 (10.3)0–Asthenia4 (10.3)0–Hot flush4 (10.3)0Palbociclib Non-hematological TRAEs, n (%)All GradesGrade ≥ 3–Fatigue12 (30.8)0–Nausea10 (25.6)0–Asthenia4 (10.3)0–Dysgeusia4 (10.3)0–Stomatitis4 (10.3)0

Citation Format: Sarat Chandarlapaty, Hannah M Linden, Patrick Neven, Katarina Petrakova, Aditya Bardia, Peter Kabos, Sofia Braga, Valentina Boni, Alice Gosselin, Marina Celanovic, Patrick Cohen, Gautier Paux, Vasiliki Pelekanou, Nils Ternès, Joon Sang Lee, Mario Campone. Updated data from AMEERA-1: Phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859), an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), combined with palbociclib in postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-11.

Abstract OT2-11-03: AMEERA-1 : Phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859), an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), with alpelisib in postmenopausal women with ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-)PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer

Background Amcenestrant is an optimized oral SERD with potent dual activity of ER antagonism and degradation resulting in inhibition of ER signaling. Amcenestrant monotherapy or combination with palbociclib showed antitumor activity and a favorable safety profile in postmenopausal women with heavily pretreated ER+/HER2- mBC. PIK3CA mutations are associated with endocrine resistance in ER+/HER2- patients (pts). Published data support the addition of the PI3Kα inhibitor alpelisib to SERD therapy for these pts. Methods AMEERA-1 (NCT03284957) is an open-label, non-comparative, dose escalation and dose expansion Phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant as monotherapy, then in combination with other anti-cancer targeted therapies. Parts F and G investigate safety run-in and dose expansion, respectively, of amcenestrant in combination with alpelisib. Postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, PIK3CA mutated in tumor tissue or cfDNA, ECOG performance status 0-1, and ≥ 6 months prior endocrine therapy are eligible. Pts must have progressed on an aromatase inhibitor plus CDK4/6 inhibitor as first-line therapy for advanced disease. Part F allows ≤ 1 prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; no prior chemotherapy is allowed in Part G. Exclusion criteria in Parts F and G include prior drugs targeting the PI3K axis, type 1 diabetes, uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, history of severe cutaneous reactions, and ongoing osteonecrosis of the jaw. Part F assesses dose-limiting toxicities and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a standard dose of amcenestrant plus the approved dose of alpelisib (300 mg once daily). Additional amcenestrant doses or a lower dose of alpelisib may be explored based on safety and PK. The primary objective in Part F is to confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of amcenestrant in combination with alpelisib, based on safety. In Part G, approximately 34 pts will be treated at the RP2D, the primary endpoint being safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints include PK and antitumor activity. This study is currently recruiting participants. This abstract was previously submitted to the 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology Annual Congress. Funding: Sanofi.

Citation Format: Mario Campone, Aditya Bardia, Peter Kabos, Sarat Chandarlapaty, Patrick Neven, Valentina Boni, Simon Lord, Sylvaine Cartot-Cotton, Marina Celanovic, Alice Gosselin, Vasiliki Pelekanou, Hannah M Linden. AMEERA-1 : Phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859), an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), with alpelisib in postmenopausal women with ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-)PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-11-03.

Abstract P5-18-07: Heart rate changes, cardiac safety, and exercise tolerance from a phase Ia/b study of giredestrant (GDC-9545) ± palbociclib in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer

Background Targeting the activity of the estrogen receptor and/or estrogen synthesis is a standard primary treatment for eligible patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Giredestrant is a highly potent, nonsteroidal oral selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader that achieves robust estrogen receptor occupancy. In animal models and early phase studies, giredestrant was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in heart rate. Therefore, we leveraged an ongoing nonrandomized, open-label, dose-escalation and -expansion phase Ia/b study (GO39932) to evaluate its cardiac safety. Methods Eligibility criteria for the main study are available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03332797. Additional relevant cardiac exclusion criteria included current treatment with medications known to decrease heart rate, e.g., beta blockers.100 mg giredestrant was given daily on Days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle (monotherapy for 14 days; patients then continued monotherapy or received combination treatment with 125 mg daily oral palbociclib for the study duration, per investigator decision). The 100 mg giredestrant dose for this arm (rather than the phase III 30 mg dose) was evaluated to increase the likelihood of observing relevant cardiac effects. Electrocardiograms were required on Day 1 of each cycle; 24-hour Holter data were collected and treadmill-exercise testing was completed at screening (prior to starting giredestrant), steady state (Day 8 [+3 days]), and as clinically indicated. Exercise testing evaluated baseline heart rate, exercise duration, maximal heart rate, and heart rate recovery. A standard Bruce protocol was followed. Results Clinical data cutoff was Apr 16, 2021. Twenty patients were enrolled and included in the current analysis; median age was 59 (range, 45-72); three patients (15%) had a history of hypertension at screening. During follow-up, no dysrhythmias were observed that required treatment or a change in study medication, and no patients were noted to have a resting heart rate of &lt;50 beats per minute based on routine heart rate monitoring. Two Grade 1 bradycardia events (&lt;60 beats per minute) were reported; both in patients receiving palbociclib. No other cardiac adverse events (AEs) were reported overall, nor any other serious AEs. Holter monitoring reports were available for 19 patients at screening and 20 on treatment. There were no episodes of second- or third-degree atrioventricular block. At screening, 2/19 patients (11%) had a paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia event (SVT; ≤30 seconds). During the study, 4/20 patients (20%) had a paroxysmal SVT event and, of these, 1/4 had four episodes of an SVT event lasting &gt;30 seconds and 1/4 also experienced one episode of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. No patients required any cardiac treatment or dose modification. Twenty patients underwent exercise testing. Exercise time was similar among patients before and after starting giredestrant (mean exercise time 7 min 10 sec before; 7 min 44 sec after). Exercise intensity was similar before and after starting treatment (mean metabolic equivalents expenditure 7.52 [standard deviation 2.81] and 8.68 [2.78], respectively). One patient had an abnormal heart rate recovery on exercise testing at screening and again while on treatment. Conclusions In a thorough cardiac safety analysis, applying routine electrocardiograms, 24-hour Holter monitoring, and exercise testing, no clinically relevant cardiac effects were observed with 100 mg giredestrant (a higher dose than the phase III 30 mg dose).

Citation Format: Tomas G Neilan, Rafael Villanueva-Vázquez, Meritxell Bellet, Elena López-Miranda, Laura García-Estévez, Peter Kabos, John Bond, Mary R Gates, Ching-Wei Chang, Valentina Boni. Heart rate changes, cardiac safety, and exercise tolerance from a phase Ia/b study of giredestrant (GDC-9545) ± palbociclib in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-07.

Abstract P1-17-01: Response of persistent metastatic ER+/Her2- breast cancer treated with fulvestrant plus enzalutamide

Background: The clinical implications of the androgen receptor (AR), particularly in the context of aromatase inhibitor (AI) refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC), are unclear. While AR is associated with more indolent primary tumors, in the absence of low estradiol/blocked ER, AR can exert a pro-survival signal. Thus, in a phase II trial of Fulvestrant (Fulv) plus Enzalutamide (Enza) in ER+/Her2- MBC (NCT02953860) we analyzed serial biopsies pre- and post-treatment. Methods: Eligible patients were women with ECOG 0-2, ER+/Her2- MBC. Fulv at 500 mg IM days 1, 15, 29 and every 4 weeks thereafter and Enzaat 160 mg po daily on a continual basis were administered. Biopsies were required at study entry and at ~4 weeks on therapy. The clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24) was the primary endpoint for efficacy. We performed mutational analysis using a modified Archer VariantPlex Solid Tumor Assay to detect mutations in ESR1 exon 8 and 67 other gene hotspots. We examined estrogen, progesterone, androgen and glucocorticoid receptor protein by IHC and multiplex for immune cells and PD-L1. Frozen cores were utilized to perform reverse phase protein array (RPPA) based protein pathway activation analysis of over 150 proteins from LCM-enriched tumor in baseline and post-treatment metastatic biopsies. Comparisons of Responders (progression free survival (PFS) equal to or longer than 24 weeks) and Non-Responders were performed using moderated t-tests on log2 transformed data. Results: 32 patients were eligible, median age was 61 years (46-87), and 90.6% had visceral disease with an average of 4 prior non-hormonal therapies and 3 prior hormonal agents (including 37.5% with prior Fulv). PFS &gt;24 weeks was observed in ~22% of patients treated with Fulv plus Enza, including 42% of those who had prior Fulv. When stratified by both AR and ER protein levels, median time to progression was 59 days (95% CI: 55 to Inf) when both targets were high (greater than or equal to 10%), but only 14 days (95% CI: 13 to Inf) when both were less than 10%. Metastases with ESR1 mutations in the ligand binding domain had significantly higher levels of ER and PR protein than those with wild type ESR1 (p&lt;0.05), while AR did not significantly differ. ER significantly decreased following 5 weeks post Fulv plus Enza in a paired t-test (p&lt;0.003). ESR1 mutation positive metastases had significantly more T helper cells, T regulatory cells and macrophages than those with wild type ESR1. In contrast, those with TP53 or PIK3CA mutations had higher CD8+ T cells, but also increased T regulatory cells compared to those WT for these genes. PD-L1 increased with treatment in all patients by paired t test (p&lt;0.03). RPPA analysis indicated that activation of mTOR pathway proteins was associated with non-response to Fulv plus Enza and patients with PIK3CA and or PTEN mutated disease had a shorter progression free survival time following treatment, with the hazard of disease progression for participants with PIK3CA or PTEN mutated disease being 2.27 times (95% CI: 0.94 to 5.46) than without these mutations (p=0.068). Conclusions: PFS &gt;24 weeks was observed in 22% of patients treated with Fulv plus Enza, including 42% who had prior Fulv treatment, suggesting contribution of the anti-androgen. Response was significantly better when metastases were &gt;10% for ER and AR. Poor response to Fulv plus Enza was significantly associated with mTOR pathway activation and patients with PIK3CA and or PTEN mutated metastases had a significantly shorter PFS. Mutation status also affected hormone receptor expression and immune infiltrates. The increase in PD-L1 protein following treatment with Fulv plus Enza warrants further pre-clinical investigation into whether the addition of anti-androgen can enhance efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in ER+ metastatic disease resistant to standard endocrine therapy approaches.

Citation Format: Jennifer Richer, Nicole Spoelstra, Alyse Winchester, Julia Wulfkuhlue, Rosa Gallagher, Sharon Sams, Gregory Vidal, Peter Kabos, Jennifer Diamond, Elena Shagisultanova, Anosheh Afghahi, Jose Mayordomo, Tessa McSpadded, Gloria Crawford, Virginia Borges, Dexiang Gao, Emanuel Petricoin, Anthony Elias. Response of persistent metastatic ER+/Her2- breast cancer treated with fulvestrant plus enzalutamide [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-01.

Triple Targeting of Breast Tumors Driven by Hormonal Receptors and HER2

Breast cancers that express hormonal receptors (HR) and HER2 display resistance to targeted therapy. Tumor-promotional signaling from the HER2 and estrogen receptor (ER) pathways converges at the cyclin D1 and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6 complex, which drives cell-cycle progression and development of therapeutic resistance. Therefore, we hypothesized that co-targeting of ER, HER2, and CDK4/6 may result in improved tumoricidal activity and suppress drug-resistant subclones that arise on therapy. We tested the activity of the triple targeted combination therapy with tucatinib (HER2 small-molecule inhibitor), palbociclib (CKD4/6 inhibitor), and fulvestrant (selective ER degrader) in HR⁺/HER2⁺ human breast tumor cell lines and xenograft models. In addition, we evaluated whether triple targeted combination prevents growth of tucatinib or palbociclib-resistant subclones in vitro and in vivo Triple targeted combination significantly reduced HR⁺/HER2⁺ tumor cell viability, clonogenic survival, and in vivo growth. Moreover, survival of HR⁺/HER2⁺ cells that were resistant to the third drug in the regimen was reduced by the other two drugs in combination. We propose that a targeted triple combination approach will be clinically effective in the treatment of otherwise drug-resistant tumors, inducing robust responses in patients.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy expands stromal populations that predict poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is an important modulator of response and resistance to endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor alpha (ER) positive breast cancer. Endocrine therapy is highly effective at reducing tumor burden and preventing recurrence in most estrogen receptor alpha (ER) positive breast cancers. Existing drugs work either directly by targeting tumor-cell ER or indirectly by inhibiting estrogen production in stromal cells with aromatase inhibitors (AI). However, many stromal cells also express ER and the direct impact of endocrine therapies on ER + stromal cells remain unclear. In this study, we investigated how neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) directly effects stromal cells by measuring changes in stomal components of the TME that favor tumor progression. We previously defined two major subsets of tumor-associated stromal cells (TASCs): CD146 positive/CDCP1 negative (TASC^CD146 ), CD146 negative/CDCP1 positive (TASC^CDCP1 ), and generated a differentially expressed genes list associated with each type. Here, we applied the TASC gene list for classification and an algorithm that estimates immune cell abundance (TIMEx) to METABRIC transcriptomic data for ER + breast cancer patients coupled with multiplex imaging and analysis of paired tissue samples pre- and post- NET with the AI exemestane. TASC^CDCP1 composition predicted for decreased patient survival in the METABRIC cohort. Exemestane treatment significantly increased expression of TASC^CDCP1 and decreased expression of TASC^CD146 . The posttreatment shift toward TASC^CDCP1 composition correlated with increased macrophage infiltration and increased CD8+ T-cell, B cell, and general stromal components. The effectiveness of NET is currently based solely on the reduction of ER+ breast cancer cells. Here, we show NET displays clear TME effects that promote the expansion of the less favorable TASC^CDCP1 population which are correlated with TME remodeling and reshaping immune infiltration supportive of tumor progression. Our findings highlight the need to further understand the role of endocrine therapy on TME remodeling, tumor progression, and patient outcomes.

IL13Rα2 Promotes Proliferation and Outgrowth of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

The survival of women with brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer remains very poor, with over 80% dying within a year of their diagnosis. Here, we define the function of IL13Rα2 in outgrowth of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) in vitro and in vivo, and postulate IL13Rα2 as a suitable therapeutic target for BM.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We performed IHC staining of IL13Rα2 in BCBM to define its prognostic value. Using inducible shRNAs in TNBC and HER2+ breast-brain metastatic models, we assessed IL13Rα2 function in vitro and in vivo. We performed RNAseq and functional studies to define the molecular mechanisms underlying IL13Rα2 function in BCBM.

RESULTS

High IL13Rα2 expression in BCBM predicted worse survival after BM diagnoses. IL13Rα2 was essential for cancer-cell survival, promoting proliferation while repressing invasion. IL13Rα2 KD resulted in FAK downregulation, repression of cell cycle and proliferation mediators, and upregulation of Ephrin B1 signaling. Ephrin-B1 (i) promoted invasion of BC cells in vitro, (ii) marked micrometastasis and invasive fronts in BCBM, and (iii) predicted shorter disease-free survival and BM-free survival (BMFS) in breast primary tumors known to metastasize to the brain. In experimental metastases models, which bypass early tumor invasion, downregulation of IL13Rα2 before or after tumor seeding and brain intravasation decreased BMs, suggesting that IL13Rα2 and the promotion of a proliferative phenotype is critical to BM progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-genomic phenotypic adaptations at metastatic sites are critical to BM progression and patients' prognosis. This study opens the road to use IL13Rα2 targeting as a therapeutic strategy for BM.

Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study

Purpose

Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, data are lacking evaluating anthracycline + taxane (ATAX) versus taxane-based (TAX) chemotherapy in older women with node-negative TNBC, as they are often excluded from trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adjuvant ATAX versus TAX on cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in older patients with node-negative TNBC.

Patients and methods

Using the SEER-Medicare database, we selected patients aged ≥ 66 years diagnosed with Stage T1-4N0M0 TNBC between 2010 and 2015 (N = 3348). Kaplan–Meier survival curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate 3-year OS and CSS. Multivariant Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with use of ATAX compared to TAX.

Results

Approximately half (N = 1679) of patients identified received chemotherapy and of these, 58.6% (N = 984) received TAX, 25.0% (N = 420) received ATAX, and 16.4% (N = 275) received another regimen. Three-year CSS and OS was improved with any adjuvant chemotherapy from 88.9 to 92.2% (p = 0.0018) for CSS and 77.2% to 88.6% for OS (p < 0.0001). In contrast, treatment with ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year CSS and OS. Three-year CSS was 93.7% with TAX compared to 89.8% (p = 0.048) for ATAX and OS was 91.0% for TAX and 86.4% for ATAX (p = 0.032).

Conclusion

While adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes, the administration of ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year OS and CSS in older women with node-negative TNBC. The use of adjuvant ATAX should be considered carefully in this patient population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06424-z.

Abstract 2611: Transcription factor-nucleosome dynamics inferred from plasma cfDNA delineates tumor and tumor-microenvironment phenotype

Our current understanding of solid tumors and their progression primarily relies on in vitro models, cell lines, patient-derived xenografts, and scarce data from invasive tissue biopsies from patients. The ability to monitor changes in chromatin structure and transcription factor binding in tumor cells using a minimally invasive approach in humans has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of disease progression and treatment resistance. In this study, we use the example of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, the most common disease subtype, and define the ER axis from plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA). While lymphoid/myeloid cell turnover represents the dominant source of cfDNA in the bloodstream, a detectable fraction of DNA from tumor tissue-of-origin can be found in patients with solid cancers. cfDNA is the product of the action of endogenous nucleases on chromatin; and retains the map of epigenomes from cells of origin. Our method therefore non-invasively captures TF-nucleosome dynamics in tumor tissue-of-origin using plasma cfDNA. First, we show that we can reliably identify the active binding of hematopoietic pioneer factor PU.1 and CTCF from cfDNA of healthy humans and cancer patients. Then to define cfDNA binding of disease specific TF ER, we used ER+ patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models allowing for a clear separation of tumor signal from hematopoietic background. This allowed us to establish the sensitivity and specificity of our approach. We also identified the subset of CUT&RUN-defined ER binding sites that feature the strongest binding in vivo from both lymphocyte background as well as cancer cells. Furthermore, we can define the active binding sites of pioneer factor FOXA1, which facilitates ER binding by opening the chromatin. Based on the TF protection levels from cfDNA we were able to define tumor as well as hematopoietic-specific TF binding sites that can serve as potential hotspots to monitor ER+ disease state at around 1% tumor fraction. These data demonstrate our ability to simultaneously monitor TF and nucleosome dynamics at disease sites just from plasma that can enable real-time monitoring of disease phenotype in a minimally invasive manner.

Citation Format: Satyanarayan Rao, Amy Han, Alexis Zukowski, Etana Kopin, Peter Kabos, Srinivas Ramachandran. Transcription factor-nucleosome dynamics inferred from plasma cfDNA delineates tumor and tumor-microenvironment phenotype [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2611.

Abstract 2867: Laboratory analyses of metastatic ER+/Her2- breast cancer treated with fulvestrant plus enzalutamide

Background: The clinical implications of the androgen receptor (AR), particularly in the context of aromatase inhibitor (AI) refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are unclear. While AR is associated with more indolent primary tumors, high AR relative to ER in primary breast cancer is associated with endocrine resistance, and in the absence of estradiol or low or blocked ER, AR can exert a pro-survival signal. In a phase II trial of fulvestrant plus enzalutamide in ER+/Her2- MBC we analyzed serial biopsies pre- and post-treatment

Methods: Eligible patients were women with ECOG 0-2, ER+/Her2- MBC. Fulvestrant 500 mg IM days 1, 15, 29 and every 4 weeks thereafter and Enzalutamide at 160 mg po daily on a continual basis were administered. Biopsies were required at study entry and at ~4 weeks on therapy. The clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24) was the primary endpoint for efficacy. We performed mutational analysis to detect mutations including ESR1 exon 8 mutations.We examined estrogen, progesterone, androgen and glucocorticoid receptors, multiplex analysis of immune cells and PD-L1, and performed reverse phase protein array (RPPA) based protein pathway activation analysis of over 150 proteins/phosphoprotein drug targets from LCM-enriched tumor epithelium in baseline and post-treatment metastatic biopsies. Comparisons of PFS Responders (PFS longer than or equal to 24 weeks) and PFS Non-Responders (PFS shorter than or equal to 5 weeks) were performed using moderated t-tests on log2 transformed data.

Results: 32 were eligible and median age was 61 years (46-87); PS 1 (0-1); a median of 2 prior chemotherapy and 2 prior hormonal therapies for metastatic disease (including 7 with prior Fulvestrant) and 90% had visceral disease. ESR1 mutant metastases had higher levels of ER and PR than those with wild type ESR1 (p&lt;0.05). In a paired t test, ER and Ki67 decreased (p&lt;0.05) with treatment. RPPA analysis of the baseline biopsy sample indicated activation of mTOR pathway proteins associated with non-response, while phosphorylated RB, EGFR and IRS1 were associated with response (PFS greater than 24 weeks). ESR1 mutation positive metastases had significantly more T helper cells, T regulatory cells and macrophages than those with wild type ESR1.PD-L1 increased with treatment in all patients by paired t test (p&lt;0.03).

Conclusions: Clinical benefit lasting 6-12 months was observed in 23% of patients. Our studies show important differences in hormone receptor expression and immune infiltrates in ESR1 mutated disease. RPPA based pathway activation mapping showed that mTOR pathway activation was associated with shorter PFS (p&lt;0.05). Since PD-L1 expression significantly increased with treatment, we conclude that mTOR and/or PD-L1 directed therapies could be useful with Fulvestrant and Enzalutamide in patients with MBC refractory to current standard of care treatments

Citation Format: Jennifer K. Richer, Nicole S. Spoelstra, Alyse Winchester, Julia Wulfkuhle, Sharon B. Sams, Gregory Vidal, Peter Kabos, Jennifer Diamond, Elena Shagisultanova, Anosheh Afghahi, Jose Mayordomo, Tessa McSpadden, Gloria Crawford, Virginia Borges, Dexiang Gao, Emanuel Petricoin, Anthony D. Elias. Laboratory analyses of metastatic ER+/Her2- breast cancer treated with fulvestrant plus enzalutamide [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2867.

Abstract 2116: Promoter enrichment of subnucleosomes using breast cancer cell-free DNA

Breast cancer is the leading cancer diagnosis and the second major cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. The use of non-invasive cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to detect and assess cancer dynamics has recently gained traction with a focus on targeted mutation panels. However, mutation panels have to contend with non-tumor origin of mutations like clonal hematopoiesis and the emergence of novel mutations in the tumor. A potential alternative is to harness the epigenomic, or non-genetic, features of cfDNA. In a healthy individual, blood cell turnover is the major contributor to the cfDNA pool. In cancer, tumor DNA adds to the cfDNA pool, which represents the end product of endogenous nucleases acting on accessible genomic DNA. Since genomic DNA is protected by histone proteins, cfDNA maps the chromatin structure of individual cells that turn over. Subnucleosomes (partially formed structures of nucleosomes that are the building blocks of chromatin) are by-products of transcription and thus reflect small protections enriched in active genes. The enrichment of subnucleosomes at promoters correlate with gene expression profiles of cfDNA tissues-of-origin and based on this knowledge, we hypothesized that we could reconstruct the transcriptional profiles of cancer cells by selectively targeting promoter regions. We first extracted cfDNA from 9 healthy female donors and 8 patient donors with various stages of breast cancer (Stage I, n=1; Stage III, n=1; Stage IV, n=4). We used a single-stranded DNA library protocol that robustly captures highly nicked cfDNA, enabling the genome-wide mapping of both nucleosomes and subnucleosomes. We performed targeted capture of promoter-proximal, nucleosome-protected sequences in cfDNA using non-overlapping tiling probes from transcription start sites to 300 bp downstream. After whole-genome sequencing of pooled libraries, we show that 76.4% (n=13/17) of samples exhibited &gt;10X enrichment compared to unenriched samples, and 64.7% (n=11/17) of samples exhibited &gt;100X enrichment. The enriched samples allowed us to profile &gt;10,000 genes, whereas unenriched samples enabled profiling between 100-10,000 genes at an average sequencing depth of 40 million reads. Overall, we obtain higher depth per sequencing read after enrichment resulting in a high-resolution snapshot of promoter-nucleosome dynamics derived by probing only ~0.18% of the genome. We believe that this significant advancement will allow us not only to identify presence of cancer but also detect distinct tumor states.

Citation Format: Alexis Zukowski, Amy Han, Peter Kabos, Srinivas Ramachandran. Promoter enrichment of subnucleosomes using breast cancer cell-free DNA [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2116.

Evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD) and biologic activity in a preoperative window-of-opportunity (WOO) study of giredestrant (GDC-9545) in postmenopausal patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative (ER+/HER2–) operable breast cancer (BC)

577

Background: Modulation of ER activity and/or estrogen synthesis is the mainstay therapeutic strategy in ER+ BC treatment. Giredestrant is a highly potent, nonsteroidal oral selective ER degrader (SERD) that achieves robust ER occupancy and is effective regardless of ESR1 mutation status. The first short-term preoperative WOO study (NCT03916744) of giredestrant in ER+/HER2– operable BC was designed for dose selection, while providing an early readout of PD as measured by traditional immunohistochemistry (IHC) and transcriptional profiling by assessing treatment effects in paired tumor tissue pre/posttreatment. We present an interim analysis. Methods: Pts were assigned to 14 days’ preoperative treatment with 10, 30, or 100 mg PO giredestrant QD. Pts had newly diagnosed, stage I–III operable, ER+/HER2– untreated BC ≥1.5 cm in diameter (by ultrasound). Modulation of ER signaling and cell proliferation were assessed using paired formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens collected before and after ̃14 days of study treatment. ER, progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki67 protein levels were analyzed by IHC. Change from baseline in tumor cell proliferation by Ki67 was the primary endpoint. Gene expression analysis was performed using the Illumina TruSeq RNA Access method. Results: From Jul 26, 2019 to Oct 15, 2020, 46/75 biomarker-evaluable pts were enrolled across three dose cohorts (10 mg: n = 15; 30 mg: n = 18; 100 mg: n = 13). Pt demographics and tumor characteristics were similar across cohorts. Baseline PAM50 analysis classified tumors as Luminal A (77%) or B (23%). Giredestrant treatment resulted in robust and indistinguishable PD and biologic activity at all doses. Geometric mean posttreatment proportional reduction of Ki67 was 79% (95% CI: 69–89; 10 mg: 80%; 30 mg: 76%; 100 mg: 80%), and 51% of tumors exhibited complete cell cycle arrest, defined as Ki67 ≤2.7%. Mean posttreatment proportional reductions of ER and PR H-scores were 71% (95% CI: 67–75) and 60% (95% CI: 51–70), respectively. An analysis of a predefined, experimentally derived set of 38 ER target genes (the ‘ER activity signature’), was completed for 42 paired tumor specimens. Forty-one of 42 pts (98%) showed a posttreatment reduction in ER activity with a mean proportional decrease of 79% (95% CI: 70–88). A wide range of baseline ER activity was observed with no correlation to baseline ER or PR H-score, or Ki67. There were no discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). A single grade 3 serious AE was reported in each cohort (all assessed as unrelated to giredestrant). No grade 4 or 5 AEs were reported. Conclusions: Giredestrant was well tolerated in the preoperative setting in ER+/HER2– operable BC, and PDs were consistent with the 30 mg dose achieving maximal ER inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT03916744.

AMEERA-1: Phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859), an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), with palbociclib (palbo) in postmenopausal women with ER+/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC)

1058

Background: AMEERA-1 (NCT03284957) investigates amcenestrant, an oral SERD, as monotherapy and combined with targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– mBC. Here we report data from dose escalation (Part C) and dose expansion (Part D) of amcenestrant + palbo. Methods: Patients (pts) were postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2– mBC and ≥ 6 mos prior advanced endocrine therapy (ET) or adjuvant (adj) ET resistance (relapse on adj ET started ≥ 24 mos ago or < 12 mos after completing adj ET). Prior chemotherapy (≤ 1) for advanced disease was allowed; targeted therapies were not except ≤ 1 CDK4/6i in Part C. Part C assessed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and aimed to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for amcenestrant (200 or 400 mg once daily [QD], in 28-day cycles) in combination with palbo (125 mg QD for 21 days on/ 7 days off). Safety (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs] and lab abnormalities per CTCAE v4.03) and pharmacokinetics (PK) were evaluated. Antitumor activity at the RP2D for amcenestrant + palbo was evaluated in a subset of Part C pts and Part D, according to RECIST v1.1, determined locally by investigators. Results: Feb 8, 2021 data cutoff. In Part C (n = 15; 200 mg: 9; 400 mg: 6), no DLTs occurred and amcenestrant 200 mg QD was selected as the RP2D with palbo, based on PK and safety data. In the pooled safety population at the RP2D (n = 39; Part C: 9; Part D: 30), median (range) age was 59 y (33–86) with ECOG PS 0 (74.4%) or 1 (25.6%) and 2 (1–6) organs involved. Immediate prior therapy was neo/adj (41.0%, all ET resistant) or advanced (59.0%, range 1–4 lines). Median (range) exposure was 32 wks (1–66) with 59.0% pts on ongoing therapy. No amcenestrant dose reductions occurred; 25.6% had ≥ 1 palbo dose reduction. Most common non-hematological TEAEs related to amcenestrant were Grade 1–2 nausea and fatigue (17.9% each), asthenia and hot flush (10.3% each); to palbo were fatigue (30.8%), nausea (25.6%), asthenia and dysgeusia (10.3% each). Two pts discontinued due to AEs. The majority (94.9%) had neutrophil count decrease (53.8% Grade ≥ 3). Preliminary antitumor activity after at least 6 cycles of therapy (unless early treatment discontinuation) is reported in the table below. Conclusions: In pts with ER+/HER2– mBC, safety at the RP2D of amcenestrant + palbo was favorable, with no safety signals of bradycardia or eye disorders. Preliminary antitumor activity was observed (ORR: 31.4% and CBR: 74.3%). Clinical trial information: NCT03284957 .[Table: see text]

Tumour-associated macrophages drive stromal cell-dependent collagen crosslinking and stiffening to promote breast cancer aggression

Stromal stiffening accompanies malignancy, compromises treatment and promotes tumour aggression. Clarifying the molecular nature and the factors that regulate stromal stiffening in tumours should identify biomarkers to stratify patients for therapy and interventions to improve outcome. We profiled lysyl hydroxylase-mediated and lysyl oxidase-mediated collagen crosslinks and quantified the greatest abundance of total and complex collagen crosslinks in aggressive human breast cancer subtypes with the stiffest stroma. These tissues harbour the highest number of tumour-associated macrophages, whose therapeutic ablation in experimental models reduced metastasis, and decreased collagen crosslinks and stromal stiffening. Epithelial-targeted expression of the crosslinking enzyme, lysyl oxidase, had no impact on collagen crosslinking in PyMT mammary tumours, whereas stromal cell targeting did. Stromal cells in microdissected human tumours expressed the highest level of collagen crosslinking enzymes. Immunohistochemical analysis of biopsies from a cohort of patients with breast cancer revealed that stromal expression of lysyl hydroxylase 2, an enzyme that induces hydroxylysine aldehyde-derived collagen crosslinks and stromal stiffening, correlated significantly with disease specific mortality. The findings link tissue inflammation, stromal cell-mediated collagen crosslinking and stiffening to tumour aggression and identify lysyl hydroxylase 2 as a stromal biomarker.

Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Immunotherapy Agents in Phase I Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Immuno-oncology (IO) agents have demonstrated efficacy across many tumor types and have led to change in standard of care. In breast cancer, atezolizumab and pembrolizumab were recently FDA-approved in combination with chemotherapy specifically for patients with PD-L1-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the single agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors demonstrate only modest single agent efficacy in breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of novel IO agents in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), beyond TNBC, treated in phase I clinical trials at the University of Colorado.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis using a database of patients with MBC who received treatment with IO agents in phase I/Ib clinical trials at the University of Colorado Hospital from January 1, 2012 to July 1, 2018. Patient demographics, treatments and clinical outcomes were obtained.

RESULTS

We identified 43 patients treated with an IO agent either as a single agent or in combination. The average age was 53 years; 55.8% had hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, 39.5% TNBC and 4.7% HER2-positive. Patients received an average of 2 prior lines of chemotherapy (range 0-7) in the metastatic setting. Most patients (72.1%) received IO alone and 27.9% received IO plus chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months and median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months. Patients remaining on study ≥ 6 months (20.9%) were more likely to be treated with chemotherapy plus IO compared to patients with a PFS < 6 months (77.8% v. 14.7%). No differences in number of metastatic sites, prior lines of chemotherapy, breast cancer subtype, absolute lymphocyte count, or LDH were identified between patients with a PFS ≥ 6 months vs. < 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our phase I experience demonstrates benefit from IO therapy that was not limited to patients with TNBC and confirms improved efficacy from IO agents in combination with chemotherapy. A subset of patients with MBC treated in phase I clinical trials with an IO agent derived prolonged clinical benefit. Predictors of response to immunotherapy in breast cancer remain uncharacterized and further research is needed to identify these factors.

Real-world evidence from a University Hospital system regarding the uptake of adjuvant pertuzumab and/or neratinib before and after their FDA approval

Purpose

Adjuvant pertuzumab and neratinib are independently FDA-approved for treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer in combination with or following trastuzumab for one year, respectively. Both agents reduce the risk of recurrence; however, the absolute benefit is modest for many patients with added risk of adverse effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical use of adjuvant pertuzumab and neratinib in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with stage I–III HER2-positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab at four University of Colorado Health hospitals between July 2016 and April 2019 were identified. Patient demographics, cancer stage, treatment, and administration of pertuzumab and/or neratinib were obtained.

Results

We identified a total of 350 patients who received adjuvant trastuzumab for stage I–III HER2-positive breast cancer; 253 (73.1%) had tumors that were ≥ T2 or node-positive disease. The rate of adjuvant pertuzumab use increased following FDA approval; pertuzumab was administered to the majority of patients with node-positive HER2-positive breast cancer. The use of adjuvant pertuzumab was associated with younger age, premenopausal status, and node-positive disease. Rates of administration of adjuvant neratinib were lower, with only 15.2% of patients receiving this therapy within 3 months of completing adjuvant trastuzumab.

Conclusion

In our cohort of patients treated within a diverse healthcare network, the majority of patients with node-positive HER2-positive breast cancer received adjuvant pertuzumab following FDA approval. The use of adjuvant neratinib was less common, potentially as a result of adverse effects, prolongation of therapy, previous administration of adjuvant pertuzumab, and modest benefit.

Abstract PS11-05: Updated data from SERENA-1: A Phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study of the next generation oral SERD AZD9833 as a monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

Background: AZD9833 is an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist and degrader (SERD) in Phase 2 clinical development for the treatment of ER+ HER2− breast cancer. Here we report data from Parts C and D of the ongoing Phase 1 study (SERENA-1) examining AZD9833 in combination with palbociclib, together with updated data from Parts A and B examining AZD9833 monotherapy. Methods: SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is an ongoing open-label Phase 1 study of AZD9833 in pre- and post-menopausal women with ER+, HER2− advanced breast cancer who have previously received ≥1 endocrine therapy and ≤2 prior chemotherapies. Prior treatment with fulvestrant and/or CDK4/6 inhibitors was permitted. The primary objective is to determine the safety and tolerability of once daily (QD) AZD9833, with dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first 28 days defining the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary objectives include anti-tumor response (including circulating tumor [ct] DNA response) and pharmacokinetics. Parts A (escalation) and B (expansion) assess AZD9833 as a monotherapy, and Parts C (escalation) and D (expansion) assess AZD9833 in combination with palbociclib. Results: At a data cut-off of March 24 2020, 17 patients had received either 150 mg or 300 mg AZD9833 in combination with palbociclib, given according to its product labeling. Eighty patients had received AZD9833 monotherapy at doses of 25, 75, 150, 300, and 450 mg QD. In patients treated with AZD9833 and palbociclib, treatment-related adverse events (AEs; experienced by ≥10% of patients) included visual disturbances*, bradycardia*, asthenia, anemia, QTcF prolongation, nausea, neutropenia, decreased white blood cell count, and vomiting (*combined terms). All instances of AZD9833-related bradycardia were Grade 1. One DLT was observed in the 150 mg cohort: CTCAE Grade 2 visual disturbances, which began on Cycle 1 Day 8 and resolved by Cycle 1 Day 9 following dose interruption. The patient restarted treatment on Cycle 1 Day 15 at 75 mg and continued this dose until data cut-off. No causally related AEs led to discontinuation of AZD9833. The tolerability of AZD9833 with palbociclib was consistent with the observed tolerability profile of AZD9833 monotherapy, and the known tolerability profile of palbociclib. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed similar AZD9833 exposure for monotherapy and palbociclib combination therapy. Similarly, palbociclib exposure was comparable with simulations using a published population pharmacokinetic model. In Part A, ESR1 hotspot mutations were detected in ctDNA at baseline in 26/56 (46%) patients; 13/26 (50%) of these patients achieved a partial response or stable disease at 24 weeks, including 5/10 (50%) with a Y537S ESR1 mutation. Further, in patients with ESR1 mutations and samples available for longitudinal ctDNA analysis, 17/20 (85%) exhibited a reduction or loss of mutant ESR1 on treatment with AZD9833. Efficacy data to be presented include objective response rate and clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks. Of note, unconfirmed partial responses have been observed in Part C after the data cut-off for this abstract. Conclusions: AZD9833 continues to show an encouraging efficacy and dose-dependent safety profile as a monotherapy or in combination with palbociclib. A Phase 2 study comparing the efficacy and safety of three doses of AZD9833 versus fulvestrant (NCT04214288), and a Phase 2 pre-surgical ‘window of opportunity’ study (EUDRA-CT; 2019-003706-2) are ongoing.

Citation Format: Richard Baird, Mafalda Oliveira, Eva Maria Ciruelos Gil, Manish R Patel, Begoña Bermejo de las Heras, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Javier García-Corbacho, Anne Armstrong, Udai Banerji, Chris Twelves, Valentina Boni, Jason Incorvati, Peter Kabos, Adam L Cohen, Bruno de Paula, Marta Capelán Rodríguez, Judy S Wang, Christina Hernando, Alejandro Falcón Gonzalez, Ivan Victoria Ruiz, Julia Lai-Kwon, Anosheh Afghani, Christos Vaklavas, Tim Brier, Steven Fox, Bistra Kirova, Teresa Klinowska, Chris Leach, Justin PO Lindemann, Richard Mather, Rhiannon Maudsley, Christopher J Morrow, Nitharsan Sathiyayogan, Andy Sykes, Li Zhang, Erika Hamilton. Updated data from SERENA-1: A Phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study of the next generation oral SERD AZD9833 as a monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-05.

Abstract PS12-14: Phase II trial of fulvestrant plus enzalutamide in ER+/Her2- advanced breast cancer

Up to 91% of ER+ breast cancers express androgen receptor (AR), but its function is uncertain. Although AR expression is associated with more indolent tumors, high AR expression relative to ER is associated with endocrine resistance, and in the absence of estradiol or if ER function is blocked, preclinical studies suggest that AR can take over to signal cell survival and proliferation. Following extensive preclinical studies and a brief phase I to demonstrate a lack of significant PK interaction, this phase II trial of fulvestrant plus enzalutamide in ER+/Her2- metastatic breast cancer was conducted. Methods: Eligible patients were women with ECOG 0-2, ER+/Her2- measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer without CNS disease. Prior fulvestrant was allowed, if clinically indicated as per treating physician. Fulvestrant was administered in standard dosing at 500 mg IM days 1, 15, 29 and every 4 weeks thereafter. Enzalutamide was given at 160 mg po daily on a continual basis. Fresh tumor biopsies were required at study entry and at about 4 weeks on therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial was clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24). Assuming the undesirable rate of 10% and desirable rate of 30%, a sample size of 24 provided 89% power to detect this 25% rate difference using an exact binomial test with a one-sided alpha of 0.085. Due to the exploratory nature of biomarker analysis, the type I error rate was not adjusted for exploring multiple biomarkers. Results: A total of 38 patients were consented, of whom 32 were eligible. Median age was 61 years (46-87); PS 1 (0-1); a median of 2 prior chemotherapy and 2 prior hormonal therapies for metastatic disease. Twelve patients had prior fulvestrant, and 90% had visceral disease. TEAEs &gt;20% included fatigue, nausea/vomiting, constipation, headache, anorexia, although most were low grade. There were no G4 or G5 toxicities. Median PFS was 2.0 months (0.5-12). CBR24 was 25% (7/28 evaluable).Conclusions: In a heavily pretreated population of women with metastatic ER+/Her2- BC, the combination of fulvestrant plus enzalutamide had manageable side effects, and modest activity. About 25% reached the primary endpoint of clinical benefit of more than 6 months on therapy. Extensive molecular studies of paired fresh biopsies from pretreatment and at 4 weeks are underway. These analyses and correlations with clinical outcome will be described.

Citation Format: Anthony D Elias, Nicole Spoelsta, Gregory A Vidal, Sharon Sams, Peter Kabos, Jennifer R Diamond, Elena Shagisultanova, Anosheh Afghahi, Jose Mayordomo, Tessa McSpadden, Gloria Crawford, Lisa Carter, Kathryn Zolman, Stephanie Armstead, Alyse Winchester, Virginia Borges, Julia Wulfkuhle, Emanuel Petricoin, Dexiang Gao, Jennifer Richer. Phase II trial of fulvestrant plus enzalutamide in ER+/Her2- advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS12-14.

Abstract PS10-03: Interim safety and efficacy analysis of phase IB / II clinical trial of tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole in patients with hormone receptor and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Background: In hormone receptor-positive / HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) breast cancer, the HER2 and estrogen receptor (ER) signals merge on the cyclin D1-CDK4/6-RB1 pathway. Thus, a combined pharmacological intervention with individual drugs targeting HER2, ER and CDK4/6 is warranted. Here, we present the safety and efficacy results of the combination of tucatinib with letrozole and palbociclib in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT03054363).

Methods: Pts with HR+/HER2+ MBC previously treated with at least 2 HER2-targeted agents were enrolled in this phase IB/II clinical trial. Pts with untreated asymptomatic or stable treated brain metastasis (BM) were included. Pts with treated progressing BM were enrolled after local treatment and classified as treated stable. Treatment consisted of tucatinib 300mg PO BID and letrozole 2.5mg PO daily continuously, and palbociclib 125mg PO daily 21 days on, 7 days off. Due to drug-drug interaction issues found in the middle of the trial and not related to this study, the dose of sensitive CYP3A4 substrate palbociclib was reduced to 75mg for all study participants, as it became evident that tucatinib is a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. The primary end-points were assessment of safety using CTCAE v.4.03 criteria, and progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points included pharmacokinetic evaluation (PKs) and objective response rate by RECIST 1.1. BM response was evaluated using RANO-BM criteria. All pts who received at least one cycle of therapy were assessed for safety.

Results: Between 11.21.2017 and 04.20.2020, we enrolled 42 pts of whom 40 were evaluable. Median age was 52.5 years (range, 22 to 82) and the median number of prior lines of therapy for MBC was 2 (range, 0 to 7); 23 pts (58%) had visceral disease and 15 (38%) had BM. All pts had prior therapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab and 18 pt (45%) had prior T-DM1. As of 06.15.2020 data cut off, 14 patients were on active therapy while 26 were off study (22 due to progressive disease [PD], 1 due to toxicity and 3 for other reasons). Median follow up time was 6 months. The combination was well tolerated with manageable and expected adverse events (AEs). The most common grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (25 pts, 60%), leukopenia (10 pts, 24%), diarrhea (8 pts, 19%), fatigue (6 pts, 14%), and infections (6 pts, 14%). One pt came off study due to asymptomatic grade 4 elevated LFTs that resolved without sequelae. There were no deaths due to AEs. Among 26 pts with measurable disease at the time of data cut-off, 8 pts (31%) had partial response, 16 pts (62%) had stable disease (SD) (7 pts [27%] had SD for ≥ 6 months and 6 pts [23%] have not yet reached 6 months of follow up) and 2 pts (8%) had PD. Among 14 patients with BM and evaluable disease by RANO-BM, 1 pt had complete response in the brain, 6 pts had SD in the brain for ≥6 months, and 7 pts had SD for 2-6 months (4 pts on active therapy have not yet reached 6 months of follow up). Median PFS is 8.7 months (10.1 months for pts without BM and 6.0 months for those with BM). Updated analysis including PKs, tumor response, and PFS will be presented.

Conclusion: The combination of tucatinib with letrozole and palbociclib showed a tolerable and manageable safety profile and evidence of considerable anti-tumor activity that warrant further clinical investigation in pts with HR+/HER2+ MBC.

Citation Format: Elena Shagisultanova, William Gradishar, Ursa Brown-Glaberman, Pavani Chalasani, Andrew J. Brenner, Alison Stopeck, Jose Mayordomo, Jennifer R. Diamond, Peter Kabos, Virginia F. Borges. Interim safety and efficacy analysis of phase IB / II clinical trial of tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole in patients with hormone receptor and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-03.

Phase I Study of Elacestrant (RAD1901), a Novel Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

This phase I study (RAD1901-005; NCT02338349) evaluated elacestrant, an investigational oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in heavily pretreated women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer, including those with estrogen receptor gene alpha (ESR1) mutation. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D).

METHODS

The study consisted of a 3 + 3 design (elacestrant capsules) followed by expansion at RP2D (400-mg capsules, then 400-mg tablets) for the evaluation of safety and antitumor activity. Elacestrant was taken once daily until progression or intolerability.

RESULTS

Of 57 postmenopausal women enrolled, 50 received RP2D (400 mg once daily): median age, 63 years; median three prior anticancer therapies, including cyclin-dependent kinase 4,6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i; 52%), SERD (52%), and ESR1 mutation (circulating tumor DNA; 50%). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred; the most common adverse events at RP2D (400-mg tablet; n = 24) were nausea (33.3%) and increased blood triglycerides and decreased blood phosphorus (25.0% each). Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in severity. The objective response rate was 19.4% (n = 31 evaluable patients receiving RP2D), 15.0% in patients with prior SERD, 16.7% in patients with prior CDK4/6i, and 33.3% in patients with ESR1 mutation (n = 5/15). The clinical benefit rate (24-week) was 42.6% overall (n = 47 patients receiving RP2D), 56.5% (n = 23, ESR1 mutation), and 30.4% (n = 23, prior CDK4/6i). Elacestrant clinical benefit was associated with decline in ESR1 mutant allele fraction.

CONCLUSION

Elacestrant 400 mg orally once daily has an acceptable safety profile and demonstrated single-agent activity with confirmed partial responses in heavily pretreated patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Notably, responses were observed in patients with ESR1 mutation as well as those with prior CDK4/6i and prior SERD. A phase III trial investigating elacestrant versus standard endocrine therapy is ongoing.

New Persistent Opioid and Benzodiazepine Use After Curative-Intent Treatment in Patients With Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Opioid and benzodiazepine use and abuse is a national healthcare crisis to which patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable. Long-term use and risk factors for opioid and benzodiazepine use in patients with breast cancer is poorly characterized.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective population-based study of patients with breast cancer diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 undergoing curative-intent treatment identified through the SEER-Medicare linked database. Primary outcomes were new persistent opioid use and new persistent benzodiazepine use. Factors associated with new opioid and benzodiazepine use were investigated by univariate and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among opioid-naïve patients, new opioid use was observed in 22,418 (67.4%). Of this group, 611 (2.7%) developed persistent opioid use at 3 months and 157 (0.7%) at 6 months after treatment. Risk factors for persistent use at 3 and 6 months included stage III disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.49-3.12, and OR, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.58-7.67), surgery plus chemotherapy (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.10-1.88, and OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.40-3.71), surgery plus chemoradiation therapy (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.10-1.96, and OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.38-3.96), and initial tramadol use (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.05-3.46, and OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.93-5.04). Among benzodiazepine-naïve patients, new benzodiazepine use was observed in 955 (10.3%), and 111 (11.6%) developed new persistent use at 3 months. Tamoxifen use was statistically significantly associated with new persistent benzodiazepine use at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

A large percentage of patients receiving curative-intent treatment of breast cancer were prescribed new opioids; however, only a small number developed new persistent opioid use. In contrast, a smaller proportion of patients received a new benzodiazepine prescription; however, new persistent use after completion of treatment was more likely and particularly related to concurrent treatment with tamoxifen.

Clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients treated in phase I clinical trials at University of Colorado Cancer Center

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) refractory to standard of care therapies have a poor prognosis. The purpose of this study was to assess patient characteristics and clinical outcomes for patients with MBC treated on phase I clinical trials. We performed a retrospective review of all patients with MBC who were enrolled in phase I clinical trials at the University of Colorado Cancer Center from January 2012 to June 2018. A total of 208 patients were identified. Patients had a mean age of 57 years and received on average 2.1 (range 0-10) prior lines of chemotherapy. The majority of patients had hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (58.6%) and 30.3% had triple-negative breast cancer. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.3-3.9) and median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months (95% CI, 9.6-13.2). Independent factors associated with longer PFS in multivariable analysis were treatment in a breast cancer-selective trial or cohort (p = 0.016), age >50 years (p = 0.002), and ≤2 prior lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (p = 0.025). Phase I clinical trials remain a valuable option for select patients with MBC and enrollment should be encouraged when available.

Converse magneto-electric effects in a core-shell multiferroic nanofiber by electric field tuning of ferromagnetic resonance

This report is on studies directed at the nature of magneto-electric (ME) coupling by ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) under an electric field in a coaxial nanofiber of nickel ferrite (NFO) and lead zirconate titanate (PZT). Fibers with ferrite cores and PZT shells were prepared by electrospinning. The core-shell structure of annealed fibers was confirmed by electron- and scanning probe microscopy. For studies on converse ME effects, i.e., the magnetic response of the fibers to an applied electric field, FMR measurements were done on a single fiber with a near-field scanning microwave microscope (NSMM) at 5-10 GHz by obtaining profiles of both amplitude and phase of the complex scattering parameter S11 as a function of bias magnetic field. The strength of the voltage-ME coupling Av was determined from the shift in the resonance field Hr for bias voltage of V = 0-7 V applied to the fiber. The coefficient Av for the NFO core/PZT shell structure was estimated to be - 1.92 kA/Vm (- 24 Oe/V). A model was developed for the converse ME effects in the fibers and the theoretical estimates are in good agreement with the data.

Analysis of circulating breast cancer cell heterogeneity and interactions with peripheral blood mononuclear cells

For solid tumors, extravasation of cancer cells and their survival in circulation represents a critical stage of the metastatic process that lacks complete understanding. Gaining insight into interactions between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and other peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) may provide valuable prognostic information. The purpose of this study was to use single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) of liquid biopsies from breast cancer patients to begin defining intravascular interactions. We captured CTCs from the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients using size-exclusion membranes followed by scRNA-seq of enriched CTCs and carry-over PBMCs. Transcriptome analysis identified two populations of CTCs: one enriched for transcripts indicative of estrogen responsiveness and increased proliferation and another enriched for transcripts characteristic of reduced proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). We applied interactome and pathway analysis to determine interactions between CTCs and other captured cells. Our analysis predicted for enhanced immune evasion in the CTC population with EMT characteristics. In addition, PD-1/PD-L1 pathway activation and T cell exhaustion were predicted in T cells isolated from breast cancer patients compared with normal T cells. We conclude that scRNA-seq of breast cancer CTCs generally stratifies them into two types based on their proliferative and epithelial state and differential potential to interact with PBMCs. Better understanding of CTC subtypes and their intravascular interactions may help design treatments directed against CTCs with high metastatic and immune-evasive competence.

Abstract 2605: Cytokeratin 5 promotes endocytosis to remodel cell adhesions in breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is clinically classified according to expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor (ER+ BC), HER2 (HER2+), or absence of these markers (triple negative BC). While TNBC has the inferior prognosis in the short term, ER+ breast cancer has an extended risk of recurrence that lasts up to 20 years and accounts for the most deaths overall. Cytokeratin 5 (CK5) is an intermediate filament protein that is expressed in the majority of TNBC cases and 10-50% of ER+ BC. In CK5+/ER+ BC, there is widespread heterogeneity in the amount of CK5+ tumor cells (~1-50%). The mere presence of CK5+ cells is an indicator of poor prognosis across both subtypes of BC; the reasons for this are poorly understood. We have shown that CK5+ cells within ER+ and TNBC cell lines, and heterogeneous PDX tumor models lose membrane localization of adherens junction proteins β-catenin and E-cadherin. Loss of membrane β-catenin and E-cadherin is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer and is a precursor to cell invasion. CK5+ cells have been reported to have increased invasive potential by us and others. Thus, identifying the mechanism of CK5-dependent loss of adherens proteins at the membrane could lead to development of therapies targeting this process. β-catenin and E-cadherin localization have been reported to be regulated through endocytosis which is mediated through the small GTPase family of Rab proteins. We performed a screen to identify potential CK5 interacting proteins in breast cancer cells and identified several Rab proteins. Thus, we hypothesize that CK5 acts as a scaffold for Rabs to promote endocytosis of β-catenin and E-cadherin to increase invasive potential.To investigate this, we treated CK5 overexpressing ER+ and TNBC cells with the endocytosis inhibitor Dyngo4a and found membrane β-catenin and E-cadherin localization were restored, suggesting that CK5 may be mediating endocytosis of β-catenin and E-cadherin. Rab5 is responsible for trafficking vesicles from the plasma membrane to the early endosomes. CK5 was confirmed to interact with Rab5 by co-IP in TNBC and CK5 overexpressing ER+ cell lines. In ongoing studies, we are testing whether Rab5 knockdown prevents loss of membrane β-catenin and E-cadherin and decreases cell invasiveness. These experiments will collectively determine whether CK5 regulated endocytosis is a targetable feature in breast cancer cells.

Citation Format: Olivia Frances McGinn, Ashley V. Ward, Jessica Finlay-Schultz, Kiran Vinod Paul, Peter Kabos, Carol Sartorius. Cytokeratin 5 promotes endocytosis to remodel cell adhesions in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2605.