Palbociclib plus letrozole as treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer for whom letrozole therapy is deemed appropriate: An expanded access study in Australia and India

AIM

Palbociclib was approved in the United States in 2015 to treat estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study evaluated outcomes and safety in patients treated with palbociclib in Australia and India with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- ABC before palbociclib became commercially available.

METHODS

Postmenopausal women (≥18 years) with HR+/HER2- ABC who were appropriate candidates for letrozole therapy received palbociclib 125 mg once daily for 21 days followed by 7 days off, and letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (continuous). Safety, tumor response, and patient-reported outcomes (Australian cohort) were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 252 patients received palbociclib plus letrozole (Australia, n = 152; India, n = 100). More patients in the Australian versus Indian cohort had received prior chemotherapy (advanced/metastatic setting: 45.9% vs. 32.0%), endocrine therapy (advanced/metastatic setting: 63.2% vs. 54.3%), and advanced/metastatic therapies (61.8% vs. 31.0%). The most frequently reported all-grade palbociclib-related treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (66.7%), fatigue (35.3%), and stomatitis (26.6%); grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported as palbociclib-related in 62.7% of patients. Febrile neutropenia was reported in six patients (2.4%). Eight patients (3.2%) discontinued because of an adverse event. The objective response rate was 19.4% (95% CI, 14.7%-24.9%) overall and 2.3% in Australian patients with ≥2 lines of prior therapy for metastatic disease. Patient-reported quality of life scores were maintained throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

In an expanded access setting in Australia and India, palbociclib plus letrozole was well tolerated in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, with a safety profile consistent with previous reports.

PALVEN: phase Ib trial of palbociclib, letrozole and venetoclax in estrogen receptor- and BCL2-positive advanced breast cancer

The addition of a CDK4/6 inhibitor to endocrine therapy improves progression-free and overall survival in women with metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. In that setting, CDK4/6 inhibitors induce a potent cell-cycle arrest (which may be accompanied by tumor senescence) but fail to induce apoptotic cell death. Venetoclax is a potent inhibitor of BCL2, a pro-survival protein overexpressed in the majority of estrogen receptor-positive cancers. Pre-clinical findings indicate that venetoclax augments tumor response to the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib by triggering apoptosis, including in senescent cells. The PALVEN phase Ib trial will further examine this finding. The primary objective is to identify the maximum tolerated dose and determine the recommended phase II dose for palbociclib, letrozole and venetoclax combination therapy. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03900884 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Abstract P5-16-11: Ipatasertib (ipat) in combination with palbociclib (palbo) and fulvestrant (fulv) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (aBC)

Background: Ipat is a potent oral AKT inhibitor that has been studied in multiple clinical trials, primarily in breast and prostate cancers. Combining fulv and AKT inhibition demonstrated efficacy in pts with HR+ aBC regardless of PI3K/AKT pathway alterations [Jones, Lancet Oncol 2020]. IPATunity150 (NCT04060862) was designed as a phase III trial with an open-label phase Ib portion adding ipat to palbo plus fulv in biomarker-unselected HR+ HER2-negative aBC. The biological rationale was to prevent or delay resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition plus endocrine therapy (ET). AKT1 alterations and PTEN loss have been implicated in resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors [Wander, Cancer Discov 2020; Costa, Cancer Discov 2020]. We report results from the open-label phase Ib portion. Patients and Methods: The primary objective was to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ipat in combination with palbo and fulv; several efficacy parameters were also analyzed. Pts with measurable disease who had not previously received a CDK4/6 inhibitor and had experienced relapse during adjuvant ET were treated with ipat at a dose of 300 mg/d, d1-21 q28d, plus standard-of-care doses of palbo (125 mg/d, d1-21 q28d) plus fulv (500 mg q28d with a loading dose in cycle 1). The selected ipat dose was lower than the 400 mg typically used in other studies because of the anticipated drug-drug interaction (DDI) when combining ipat (a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate and mild-to-moderate CYP3A inhibitor) with palbo (a weak time-dependent CYP3A4 inhibitor and CYP3A substrate). Results: Of the 20 pts treated, 20% were Asian, 65% had primary endocrine resistance (relapse ≤2 years after starting adjuvant ET), 80% had received prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, and 60% had liver and/or lung metastases. At the data cutoff (19 Mar 2021; median follow-up 6.1 months), median treatment duration was 5.1, 5.9, and 5.3 months for ipat, palbo, and fulv, respectively. Treatment was ongoing in 13 pts. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 80% of pts (no grade 5). The most common AEs were diarrhea (80% any grade, 10% grade 3, no grade 4) and neutropenia (75% any grade, 45% grade 3, 20% grade 4). Other notable grade ≥3 AEs were grade 3 liver function test elevations in 10%. There were no cases of febrile neutropenia and only 1 case of pneumonitis (grade 1). AEs led to at least one dose reduction of ipat in 6 pts (30%; diarrhea n=3 [with vomiting in 1 pt], neutropenia n=3 [with fatigue in 1 pt]) and of palbo in 9 pts (45%; all for neutropenia). One pt (5%) discontinued ipat and palbo permanently due to ongoing neutropenia after protocol-defined dose reductions. As expected, a DDI led to increased ipat exposure (AUC0-24,ss ~60% and Cmax ~40%) when ipat and palbo were combined. Based on population PK analysis, palbo AUC0-24,ss was ~30% higher than reported from the PALOMA 1 and 2 trials, which was expected and consistent with previously reported physiologically based PK modeling of palbo exposure when administered with moderate CYP3A inhibitors [Yu, J Clin Pharmacol 2017]. All 20 pts had at least one post-baseline tumor assessment. Best overall response rate was 45% (95% CI: 23-68%), including confirmed responses in 7 pts (35%; 5% complete response, 30% partial response) at the clinical cutoff date. Median duration of response was 9.6 months (95% CI: 7.1-not estimable). An additional 10 pts (50%) had stable disease. Progression-free survival results were immature (events in 7 pts). There was no obvious association between efficacy and mutations in PIK3CA/AKT1 as tested in ctDNA. Conclusion: The triplet combination of ipat, fulv, and palbo had an acceptable safety profile generally consistent with that of the individual study drugs; ipat exposure was increased through a predicted DDI. Updated results will be presented.

Citation Format: Mafalda Oliveira, Aditya Bardia, Sung-Bae Kim, Naoki Niikura, Cristina Hernando, Gustavo Werutsky, Yoland Antill, Pedro Liedke, Catherine Oakman, Eriko Tokunaga, Seth Wander, Vanessa Krause, Toshinari Yamashita, Frauke Schimmoller, Jacob Rotmensch, Heidi Savage, Rucha Sane, Nicholas Turner. Ipatasertib (ipat) in combination with palbociclib (palbo) and fulvestrant (fulv) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (aBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-11.

Evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD) and biologic activity in a preoperative window-of-opportunity (WOO) study of giredestrant (GDC-9545) in postmenopausal patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative (ER+/HER2–) operable breast cancer (BC)

577

Background: Modulation of ER activity and/or estrogen synthesis is the mainstay therapeutic strategy in ER+ BC treatment. Giredestrant is a highly potent, nonsteroidal oral selective ER degrader (SERD) that achieves robust ER occupancy and is effective regardless of ESR1 mutation status. The first short-term preoperative WOO study (NCT03916744) of giredestrant in ER+/HER2– operable BC was designed for dose selection, while providing an early readout of PD as measured by traditional immunohistochemistry (IHC) and transcriptional profiling by assessing treatment effects in paired tumor tissue pre/posttreatment. We present an interim analysis. Methods: Pts were assigned to 14 days’ preoperative treatment with 10, 30, or 100 mg PO giredestrant QD. Pts had newly diagnosed, stage I–III operable, ER+/HER2– untreated BC ≥1.5 cm in diameter (by ultrasound). Modulation of ER signaling and cell proliferation were assessed using paired formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens collected before and after ̃14 days of study treatment. ER, progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki67 protein levels were analyzed by IHC. Change from baseline in tumor cell proliferation by Ki67 was the primary endpoint. Gene expression analysis was performed using the Illumina TruSeq RNA Access method. Results: From Jul 26, 2019 to Oct 15, 2020, 46/75 biomarker-evaluable pts were enrolled across three dose cohorts (10 mg: n = 15; 30 mg: n = 18; 100 mg: n = 13). Pt demographics and tumor characteristics were similar across cohorts. Baseline PAM50 analysis classified tumors as Luminal A (77%) or B (23%). Giredestrant treatment resulted in robust and indistinguishable PD and biologic activity at all doses. Geometric mean posttreatment proportional reduction of Ki67 was 79% (95% CI: 69–89; 10 mg: 80%; 30 mg: 76%; 100 mg: 80%), and 51% of tumors exhibited complete cell cycle arrest, defined as Ki67 ≤2.7%. Mean posttreatment proportional reductions of ER and PR H-scores were 71% (95% CI: 67–75) and 60% (95% CI: 51–70), respectively. An analysis of a predefined, experimentally derived set of 38 ER target genes (the ‘ER activity signature’), was completed for 42 paired tumor specimens. Forty-one of 42 pts (98%) showed a posttreatment reduction in ER activity with a mean proportional decrease of 79% (95% CI: 70–88). A wide range of baseline ER activity was observed with no correlation to baseline ER or PR H-score, or Ki67. There were no discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). A single grade 3 serious AE was reported in each cohort (all assessed as unrelated to giredestrant). No grade 4 or 5 AEs were reported. Conclusions: Giredestrant was well tolerated in the preoperative setting in ER+/HER2– operable BC, and PDs were consistent with the 30 mg dose achieving maximal ER inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT03916744.

Abstract OT-27-01: PALVEN: A phase 1b study of palbociclib, letrozole and venetoclax in estrogen receptor, BCL2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors are integral to the treatment of Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Although they are potent inhibitors of proliferation, tumor cell death (by apoptosis) may be curtailed. Venetoclax, an inhibitor of the pro-survival protein BCL2, has shown promise in an early phase clinical trial in ER+ MBC1. Moreover, preclinical studies suggest that venetoclax could improve tumor response to endocrine therapy and a CDK4/6 inhibitor by triggering apoptosis, including in growth arrested/senescent cells2. PALVEN is a phase 1b study (NCT NCT03900884), aiming to combine venetoclax with letrozole and the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. Trial Design: Eligible patients will be treated with letrozole (2.5 mg), palbociclib (75-125 mg) and venetoclax (100-800 mg) using a 3+3 dose escalation study design, with a maximum of 6 patients per dose cohort. Both palbociclib and venetoclax will be administered on day 1-21 of a 28 day cycle. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) will be evaluated in the first 4 weeks of treatment. Tumor assessment will be performed every 8 weeks for 24 weeks and then every 12 weeks until progression. The primary endpoint is to describe DLTs reported within the first 4 weeks of treatment and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), in order to define a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints include type and worst grade adverse events per patient (CTCAE v5.0), tumor response (RECIST v1.1), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression free and overall survival (PFS, OS) as well as patient reported outcomes. Exploratory endpoints include metabolic response (using FDG-PET), changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), peripheral blood leukocyte subsets, and tumor phenotype in paired and progression biopsies. Eligibility Women with ER+ (≥10% positively stained carcinoma cells) and BCL2+ (≥50% cells with at least moderate cytoplasmic staining; intensity 2-3 on a 0-3 scale), unresectable locally advanced or MBC are eligible. Patients must have measurable or evaluable disease as per RECIST v1.1 and ECOG performance score of 0-1. Participants must not have had >2 prior lines of treatment in the metastatic setting and no previous treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitor or venetoclax in the adjuvant or metastatic setting. Statistical methods This is a proof-of-concept, dose escalation study and any statistical analysis of responses will be exploratory. Analysis will be focused primarily on adverse events, particularly DLTs reported in the DLT observation period. All secondary endpoints will be analysed separately combining all dosing cohorts. The response rate and CBR will be estimated with 95% confidence intervals calculated using exact methods based on the binomial distribution. Time-to-event endpoints (PFS and OS) will be described using Kaplan-Meier methods to calculate the median survival. Response rate, CBR and time-to-event endpoints (PFS and OS) will also be described for patients treated in the 1st versus 2nd and 3rd line setting. Accrual Target accrual is 6-36, depending on the number of dose cohorts required to reach DLT. Recruitment is active at 2 sites in Australia. References 1 Lok, S.W., et al. (2019). Cancer Discov 9, 354-369. 2 Whittle, J.R., et al. (2020). Clin Cancer Res Advance online.

Citation Format: Christine Muttiah, Avraham Travers, James R Whittle, Sarah-Jane Dawson, Belinda Yeo, Jane E Visvader, Catherine Oakman, Geoffrey J Lindeman. PALVEN: A phase 1b study of palbociclib, letrozole and venetoclax in estrogen receptor, BCL2-positive metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-27-01.

Assessing the usefulness and acceptability of a low health literacy online decision aid about reproductive choices for younger women with breast cancer: the aLLIAnCE pilot study protocol

Background

Young women diagnosed with breast cancer may be confronted by many difficult decisions, especially around fertility preservation prior to commencing cancer treatment. The information to be conveyed is complex, and it may be difficult to weigh up the risks and benefits of the different fertility preservation options available. This complexity is compounded by the widespread low levels of literacy and health literacy in Australia, which may result in greater difficulties in understanding available health information and in decision-making.

Methods/design

A working group of experts have developed a fertility-related online decision aid for a low health literacy population, guided by health literacy principles. The decision aid will be pilot tested with 30 women diagnosed with early breast cancer between 5 years and 6 months previously. To be eligible, at the time of diagnosis, women must be between 18 and 40 years (inclusive), pre-menopausal, have no history of metastatic disease, have not completed their families, be able to give informed consent and have low health literacy. Participants will be asked to reflect back to the time in which they were diagnosed. Participants will complete a questionnaire before and after reviewing the decision aid to determine the feasibility, use and acceptability of the decision aid. The decision aid will be modified accordingly. Participants may also choose to review a previously developed (high literacy) decision aid and provide feedback in comparison to the low health literacy decision aid.

Discussion

This project represents the first study to develop an online fertility decision aid developed from low health literacy models in the context of breast cancer. It is anticipated that the low health literacy decision aid will be useful and acceptable to young women with low health literacy who have been diagnosed with breast cancer and that it will be preferred over the high literacy decision aid.

Trial registration

ACTRN12615001364561p

Serum metabolomic profiles evaluated after surgery may identify patients with oestrogen receptor negative early breast cancer at increased risk of disease recurrence. Results from a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Metabolomics is a global study of metabolites in biological samples. In this study we explored whether serum metabolomic spectra could distinguish between early and metastatic breast cancer patients and predict disease relapse.

METHODS

Serum samples were analysed from women with metastatic (n = 95) and predominantly oestrogen receptor (ER) negative early stage (n = 80) breast cancer using high resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Multivariate statistics and a Random Forest classifier were used to create a prognostic model for disease relapse in early patients.

RESULTS

In the early breast cancer training set (n = 40), metabolomics correctly distinguished between early and metastatic disease in 83.7% of cases. A prognostic risk model predicted relapse with 90% sensitivity (95% CI 74.9-94.8%), 67% specificity (95% CI 63.0-73.4%) and 73% predictive accuracy (95% CI 70.6-74.8%). These results were reproduced in an independent early breast cancer set (n = 40), with 82% sensitivity, 72% specificity and 75% predictive accuracy. Disease relapse was associated with significantly lower levels of histidine (p = 0.0003) and higher levels of glucose (p = 0.01), and lipids (p = 0.0003), compared with patients with no relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of a serum metabolomic prognostic model for disease relapse in individuals with ER-negative early stage breast cancer is promising. A confirmation study is ongoing to better define the potential of metabolomics as a host and tumour-derived prognostic tool.

TOP2A protein by quantitative immunofluorescence as a predictor of response to epirubicin in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer

Aim: Anthracyclines are commonly used in breast cancer, although they lack validated predictive biomarkers. We explored the interaction between TOP2A protein by quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) and anthracycline sensitivity. Patients & methods: Patients with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer received neoadjuvant epirubicin. Pretreatment biopsies were analyzed using AQUA®. Total, cytoplasmic (C) and nuclear (N) TOP2A protein concentrations were expressed as QIF scores and compared with pathologic complete response (pCR), TOP2A by immunohistochemistry, TOP2A mRNA, TOP2A and HER2 gene status, and Ki-67 level. Results: In total, 76 cases were assessable. C, N, and total scores did not correlate with pCR, or other markers. The N:C ratio differed significantly by HER2 status. No pCRs occurred in patients in the lowest N:C quartile. Conclusion: Although no relevant correlation between TOP2A QIF scores and pCR was found, N:C ratio may have a negative predictive role, and may merit further exploration in a multifactorial predictive model that includes tumor and host factors.

Evaluation of the cardiovascular health study (CHS) instrument and the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13) in elderly cancer patients. Are we still missing the right screening tool?

BACKGROUND

A geriatric screening tool would be valuable to identify elderly cancer patients who might benefit from a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). This study evaluated the accuracy of the cardiovascular health study (CHS) instrument in predicting abnormality in CGA. The vulnerable elders' survey-13 (VES-13) was also evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 70 years with solid tumors underwent a CGA after being screened with the CHS and VES-13. Analyses were conducted for the overall population and according to the disease status (early or advanced) and type of early cancer (breast or gastrointestinal, GI).

RESULTS

Of 259 patients, 75% were impaired according to the CHS and 47% according to the VES-13. CGA impairment was reported in 171 patients (66%). In the overall population, overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of CHS in identifying CGA impairments were 74%, 87% and 49%, respectively. The corresponding figures for the VES-13 were 68%, 62% and 81%. Sensitivity and specificity of CHS in predicting CGA impairments in subgroups were early 81% and 55%, advanced 98% and 29%; early breast 78% and 69%, early GI 87.5% and 19%.

CONCLUSIONS

The CHS compared favourably with VES-13 for sensitivity. However, the great variability in specificity observed with the CHS within subgroups limits its applicability in the global population.

Overall survival benefit for sequential doxorubicin-docetaxel compared with concurrent doxorubicin and docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer--8-year results of the Breast International Group 02-98 phase III trial

Background In women with node-positive breast cancer, the Breast International Group (BIG) 02-98 tested the incorporation of docetaxel (Taxotere) into doxorubicin (Adriamycin)-based chemotherapy, and compared sequential and concurrent docetaxel. At 5 years, there was a trend for improved disease-free survival (DFS) with docetaxel. We present results at 8-year median follow-up and exploratory analyses within biologically defined subtypes. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatments: (i) sequential control: doxorubicin (A) (75 mg/m(2)) × 4 →classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF); (ii) concurrent control: doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (AC)(60/600 mg/m(2)) × 4 →CMF; (iii) sequential docetaxel: A (75 mg/m(2)) × 3 → docetaxel (T) (100 mg/m(2)) × 3 → CMF and (iv) concurrent docetaxel: AT(50/75 mg/m(2)) × 4 →CMF. The primary comparison evaluated docetaxel efficacy regardless of the schedule. Exploratory analyses were undertaken within biologically defined subtypes. Results Two thousand eight hundred and eighty-seven patients were enrolled. After 93.4 months of median follow-up, there were 916 DFS events. For the primary comparison, there was no significant improvement in DFS from docetaxel [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.80-1.05, P = 0.187]. In secondary comparisons, sequential docetaxel significantly improved DFS compared with sequential control (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67-0.99, P = 0.036), and significantly improved DFS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.99, P = 0.035) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65-0.98, P = 0.028) compared with concurrent doxorubicin-docetaxel. Luminal-A disease had the best prognosis. HRs favored addition of sequential docetaxel in all subtypes, except luminal-A; but this observation was not statistically supported because of limited numbers. Conclusion With further follow-up, the sequential docetaxel schedule resulted in significantly better OS than concurrent doxorubicin-docetaxel, and continued to show better DFS than sequential doxorubicin-based control.

Exploration of serum metabolomic profiles and outcomes in women with metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Metabolomics, a global study of metabolites and small molecules, is a novel expanding field. In this pilot study, metabolomics has been applied to serum samples from women with metastatic breast cancer to explore outcomes and response to treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pre-treatment and serial on-treatment serum samples were available from an international clinical trial in which 579 women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to paclitaxel plus either a targeted anti-HER2 treatment (lapatinib) or placebo. Serum metabolomic profiles were obtained using 600 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Profiles were compared with time to progression, overall survival and treatment toxicity.

RESULTS

Pre- and on-treatment serum samples were assessed for over 500 patients. Unbiased metabolomic profiles in the biologically unselected overall trial population did not correlate with outcome or toxicity. In a subgroup of patients with HER2-positive disease treated with paclitaxel plus lapatinib, metabolomic profiles from patients in the upper and lower thirds of the dataset showed significant differences for time to progression (N = 22, predictive accuracy = 89.6%) and overall survival (N = 16, predictive accuracy = 78.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

In metastatic breast cancer, metabolomics may play a role in sub selecting patients with HER2 positive disease with greater sensitivity to paclitaxel plus lapatinib.

Prognostic and predictive value of TP53 mutations in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline- or anthracycline/taxane-based adjuvant therapy: results from the BIG 02-98 phase III trial

INTRODUCTION

Pre-clinical data suggest p53-dependent anthracycline-induced apoptosis and p53-independent taxane activity. However, dedicated clinical research has not defined a predictive role for TP53 gene mutations. The aim of the current study was to retrospectively explore the prognosis and predictive values of TP53 somatic mutations in the BIG 02-98 randomized phase III trial in which women with node-positive breast cancer were treated with adjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy with or without docetaxel.

METHODS

The prognostic and predictive values of TP53 were analyzed in tumor samples by gene sequencing within exons 5 to 8. Patients were classified according to p53 protein status predicted from TP53 gene sequence, as wild-type (no TP53 variation or TP53 variations which are predicted not to modify p53 protein sequence) or mutant (p53 nonsynonymous mutations). Mutations were subcategorized according to missense or truncating mutations. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox-regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

TP53 gene status was determined for 18% (520 of 2887) of the women enrolled in BIG 02-98. TP53 gene variations were found in 17% (90 of 520). Nonsynonymous p53 mutations, found in 16.3% (85 of 520), were associated with older age, ductal morphology, higher grade and hormone-receptor negativity. Of the nonsynonymous mutations, 12.3% (64 of 520) were missense and 3.6% were truncating (19 of 520). Only truncating mutations showed significant independent prognostic value, with an increased recurrence risk compared to patients with non-modified p53 protein (hazard ratio = 3.21, 95% confidence interval = 1.740 to 5.935, P = 0.0002). p53 status had no significant predictive value for response to docetaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

p53 truncating mutations were uncommon but associated with poor prognosis. No significant predictive role for p53 status was detected.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00174655.

Management of elderly patients with breast cancer: updated recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA)

As the mean age of the global population increases, breast cancer in older individuals will be increasingly encountered in clinical practice. Management decisions should not be based on age alone. Establishing recommendations for management of older individuals with breast cancer is challenging because of very limited level 1 evidence in this heterogeneous population. In 2007, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) created a task force to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of breast cancer in elderly individuals. In 2010, a multidisciplinary SIOG and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) task force gathered to expand and update the 2007 recommendations. The recommendations were expanded to include geriatric assessment, competing causes of mortality, ductal carcinoma in situ, drug safety and compliance, patient preferences, barriers to treatment, and male breast cancer. Recommendations were updated for screening, primary endocrine therapy, surgery, radiotherapy, neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy, and metastatic breast cancer.

ES3-3: Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with a Borderline HER-2 Status

Adjuvant trastuzumab is indicated in individuals with early breast cancer which has HER2 gene amplification and/or HER2 protein overexpression. In the pivotal phase III adjuvant trials which tested the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy, positive HER2 status was defined as strong and complete cell membrane staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of >10% of invasive tumor cells or gene amplification determined by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) ratio of HER2 gene copy number to chromosome 17 centromeres (CEP17) of >2.0.

The decision to use trastuzumab is based on a binary categorization of HER2 as positive or negative. As such, the definition of HER2 positivity is critical, as it dictates who will or will not receive potentially efficacious treatment. The challenge in creating guidelines for anti-HER2 treatment is that an HER2 result is described as positive or negative, but HER2 exists as a continuum of gene copy number and protein expression.

A source of uncertainty in the management of patients is the discordance between the diagnostic thresholds for HER2 adopted in the adjuvant trastuzumab trials and those specified in the subsequently published American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists (ASCO-CAP) guidelines. According to ASCO-CAP, HER2 positivity is defined by uniform intense and complete membrane staining by IHC in ≥30% of cells or HER2/ CEP17 FISH ratio≥2.2. The definition is stricter than thresholds applied in the adjuvant trials, identifying a narrower population as HER2 positive.

A further source of uncertainty is discordance between IHC and FISH. There is generally high concordance between the two methods, as increased HER2 protein is generally attributable to HER2 amplification. Discordant results may occur if one assay is correct and the other is incorrect, due to pre-analytic, analytic, and/or post-analytic error. True discordance may be attributable to intra-tumoral heterogeneity or polysomy chromosome 17. Within a tumor, HER2 amplification and/or overexpression may be detected in discrete focal HER2 amplified clones (FHAC) or in individual cells diffusely scattered on a dominant background of HER2 negative/equivocal expression. FHAC have been reported in association with discordance between IHC and FISH. Cells with polysomy chromosome 17 have extra copies of the HER2 gene. In such cases, tumors may be IHC positive although the HER2:CEP17 FISH ratio is not elevated. Notably, available data are inconsistent and uncertainty remains as to whether polysomy 17 without HER2 amplification is associated with protein overexpression

During this session, clinical situations with borderline HER2−status will be presented and discussed. Biological heterogeneity within the same tumor, polysomy chromosome 17, and moderate HER2 positivity may contribute to determination of an uncertain HER2 status, making unclear the benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab in these cases. Clinical considerations highlighting pros/cons of adjuvant trastuzumab in these cases, as well as updated biological information and clinical perspectives, will be presented.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr ES3-3.

Chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab

The prognosis of pT1N0M0/stage I breast cancer has generally been considered so favourable that these patients are not routinely offered adjuvant systemic therapy. However, biological heterogeneity within pT1N0M0 dictates diverse outcomes within the subgroup. HER2 gene amplification or protein overexpression is uncommon in pT1N0M0 disease, but, when present, is clearly associated with a higher risk of recurrence. The role of anti-HER2 therapy in these patients is controversial. Few women with node-negative, small tumours were included in the adjuvant trastuzumab trials. There are no robust data on trastuzumab in this patient subset, although subgroup analyses suggest that proportional benefits are independent of T and N. With current guidelines and scheduling, committing to adjuvant trastuzumab involves concurrent chemotherapy, 1 year of treatment and potential cardiotoxicity. A further challenge with anti-HER2 therapy is the potential benefit in patients with demonstrable HER2 positivity within a predominantly HER2-negative tumour. The decision for therapy requires a yes/no answer, but HER2 status derives from a continuum of gene copy number and protein expression. The diagnostic threshold is made more complex by heterogeneity of the HER2 status within a tumour. This review focuses on available data for HER2-positive pT1N0M0 disease and explores the significance of intratumoural HER2 heterogeneity.

Fulvestrant in the management of postmenopausal women with advanced, endocrine-responsive breast cancer

Fulvestrant is a pure estrogen antagonist that binds, blocks and downgrades the estrogen receptor (ER). Its unique mechanism of action is its antitumor activity after progression on prior endocrine therapy. Fulvestrant has shown activity in ER-dependent cells that are ligand independent. Fulvestrant has been approved at 250 mg/month for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer after progression or recurrence on antiestrogen therapy. The fulvestrant 500 mg regimen has just received approval by the EMA and the US FDA, supported by dose-dependent ER downregulation and the recent results of the clinical trial CONFIRM. Fulvestrant in combination with systemic lowering of estrogen has shown no improvement over fulvestrant alone. Combination therapy with inhibitors of growth factor signaling may have greater efficacy and is under exploration. To enhance the benefit of fulvestrant and improve outcomes for individuals with ER-positive breast cancer, greater understanding of resistance mechanisms is required. A key issue is identification of patients with ER-positive disease who retain sensitivity to antiestrogen therapy after progression on tamoxifen and/or aromatase inhibitors.

Significance of micrometastases: circulating tumor cells and disseminated tumor cells in early breast cancer

Adjuvant systemic therapy targets minimal residual disease. Our current clinical approach in the adjuvant setting is to presume, rather than confirm, the presence of minimal residual disease. Based on assessment of the primary tumor, we estimate an individual's recurrence risk. Subsequent treatment decisions are based on characteristics of the primary tumor, with the presumption of consistent biology and treatment sensitivity between micrometastases and the primary lesion. An alternative approach is to identify micrometastatic disease. Detection of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow and circulating tumor cells (CTC) from peripheral blood collection may offer quantification and biocharacterization of residual disease. This paper will review the prognostic and predictive potential of micrometastatic disease in early breast cancer.

Uncovering the metabolomic fingerprint of breast cancer

Metabolomics, the study of metabolites and small intermediate molecules, may play a key role in further elucidation of breast cancer. This dynamic, simultaneous assessment of thousands of metabolites allows identification of the presence, concentration and fluxes of specific metabolites, and recognition of the critical metabolic pathways recruited in carcinogenesis. Studies of tumour cell and tissue allow focused analysis on the tumour, whilst studies of biofluids have the appeal of concurrent assessment of tumour and host. Elucidation of these metabolites and pathways may provide essential insights into both the intercellular environment and host/tumour interaction, allowing recognition of new biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of outcome, new therapy targets and novel approaches for monitoring response and toxicity. Certainly, the field of metabolomics may evolve as a valuable, complementary clinical tool. In this review, current metabolomic data in breast cancer will be presented. The dominant metabolic pathways and metabolite disturbances associated with malignant transformation of breast cells will be outlined, leading to an overview of potential clinical implications for individuals with breast cancer.

Role of lapatinib in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer

Lapatinib is a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ErbB1) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/ErbB2). EGFR and HER2 overexpression is associated with aggressive breast cancer with a high risk of disease relapse and death. Although lapatinib targets both EGFR and HER2, its effects on HER2 appear to be more critical. The role of lapatinib in the first-line setting remains unclear. A phase II first-line monotherapy lapatinib trial in HER2-therapy-naïve metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients confirms efficacy in HER2-positive tumors. Retrospective analysis of a phase III, first-line MBC study confirmed incremental benefit from lapatinib and paclitaxel over paclitaxel alone in HER2-positive disease. A prospective phase III study confirms superiority of letrozole and lapatinib over letrozole alone in HER2-positive MBC. Further investigation is required to define the potential first-line role for lapatinib. Particular strengths appear to be its manageable toxicity profile, lack of cross resistance with trastuzumab, activity in central nervous system disease, and synergy in combination with other anticancer therapy. Current limitations are lack of dosing recommendations from early trials, lack of predictive biomarkers beyond HER2 status, and lack of large prospective phase III trials for HER2-positive disease in the first-line setting. The role of lapatinib in HER2-negative disease is unclear.

Preoperative investigations for metastatic staging of colon and rectal cancer across multiple centres--what is current practice?

OBJECTIVE

The optimal strategy for elective distant staging of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) has yet to be defined, with current guidelines based on small and limited series. One specific issue requiring review is the value of routine computerized tomographic (CT) chest examination. Also lacking is data on current routine clinical practice.

METHOD

A retrospective chart review of consecutive cases of elective surgery for CRC from five hospitals.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-seven cases were reviewed, 128 colon and 129 rectal primaries. 164 (64%) of patients overall, ranging from 45% to 88% across the individual centres, had a preoperative serum CEA level performed. CT abdomen/pelvis was performed in 222 (86%) of cases, ranging from 69% to 98% per centre. CT chest was performed in 95 (37%) of cases, 47% of rectal vs 29% of colon cancers (P = 0.004). In 17 cases (18%) CT chest examinations revealed abnormalities suspicious for metastatic disease, leading to a change in management in six (35%) of these cases. Of the 17 cases with an abnormal CT chest, in only 5 of the 14 (36%) where carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were also recorded was this increased, and in only three (21%) was this markedly (> 10 microg/l) elevated.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial variability exists in the preoperative evaluation of patients with CRC. Many patients do not have a CEA and/or abdominal imaging performed. Where performed, CT chest revealed suspicious findings in a significant number of patients, the vast majority of whom had a normal or near normal CEA. Future studies are required to define optimal preoperative staging.

Recent advances in systemic therapy: new diagnostics and biological predictors of outcome in early breast cancer

The key to optimising our approach in early breast cancer is to individualise care. Each patient has a tumour with innate features that dictate their chance of relapse and their responsiveness to treatment. Often patients with similar clinical and pathological tumours will have markedly different outcomes and responses to adjuvant intervention. These differences are encoded in the tumour genetic profile. Effective biomarkers may replace or complement traditional clinical and histopathological markers in assessing tumour behaviour and risk. Development of high-throughput genomic technologies is enabling the study of gene expression profiles of tumours. Genomic fingerprints may refine prediction of the course of disease and response to adjuvant interventions. This review will focus on the role of multiparameter gene expression analyses in early breast cancer, with regards to prognosis and prediction. The prognostic role of genomic signatures, particularly the Mammaprint and Rotterdam signatures, is evolving. With regard to prediction of outcome, the Oncotype Dx multigene assay is in clinical use in tamoxifen treated patients. Extensive research continues on predictive gene identification for specific chemotherapeutic agents, particularly the anthracyclines, taxanes and alkylating agents.