Palbociclib as single agent or in combination with the endocrine therapy received before disease progression for estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: TREnd trial

Background

The activity of palbociclib as a single agent in advanced breast cancer has not been extensively studied, with the only available clinical data limited to heavily pretreated patients. Preclinical data suggests palbociclib may partially reverse endocrine resistance, though this hypothesis has not been evaluated in previous clinical studies. This phase II, open-label, multicenter study examined the activity of palbociclib monotherapy, as well as palbociclib given in combination with the same endocrine therapy (ET) that was received prior to disease progression, in postmenopausal women with moderately pretreated, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2 negative advanced breast cancer.

Patients and methods

Eligible women with advanced disease which had progressed on one or two prior ETs were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either palbociclib alone, or palbociclib in combination with the ET as previously received. Primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Between October 2012 and July 2016, a total of 115 patients were randomized. The CBR was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI): 41.5-63.7] for combination therapy, and 60% (95% CI: 47.8-72.9) for monotherapy. Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI: 5.6-12.7) for combination therapy, and 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.4-8.5) for monotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69; 95% CI: 0.4-1.1, exploratory P-value = 0.12]. Exploratory analyses revealed the PFS advantage for combination therapy was seen in the subgroup of patients who received prior ET for >6 months (HR 0.53; 95% CI: 0.3-0.9, exploratory P-value = 0.02), but not in those who received prior ET for ≤6 months.

Conclusion

Palbociclib has clinical activity as a single agent in women with moderately pretreated, oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Palbociclib may have potential to reverse endocrine resistance in patients with a history of previous durable response to ET.

Clinical trial information

NCT02549430.

Abstract P4-13-04: Not presented

This abstract was not presented at the conference.

Citation Format: Cazzaniga ME, Blasi L, Pronzato P, Giordano M, Garrone O, Donadio M, Del Mastro L, Livi L, Natoli C, Michelotti A, Turletti A, Riccardi F, De Laurentiis M, Marchetti P, Montemurro F, Romagnoli E, De Placido S, Biganzoli L, Bologna A, Bria E, Mustacchi G. Not presented [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-04.

An Intensive Treatment with Mitoxantrone and Ifosfamide in Second-Line Therapy of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Aims and background

Both mitoxantrone (DHAD) and ifosfamide (IFO) have given promising results when administered as single agents in advanced ovarian cancer pretreated with platinum compounds. The aim of this I.T.M.O. group pilot trial was to evaluate, in a selected population of ovarian cancer patients, the efficacy and tolerability of the following intensive second-line regimen: DHAD, 12 mg/m2 i.v., day 1; IFO, 4,000 mg/m2 i.v., days 1 and 2; Mesna, 800 mg/m2 i.v. t.i.d., days 1 and 2. Filgrastim (5 μg/kg/day i.m.) was given from day 6 to day 19 to reduce the expected neutropenia. Cycles were repeated every 21 days.

Methods

Nineteen platinum-pre-treated patients were enrolled and 14 were evaluated for tumor response; the disease of 5 patients was not measurable clinically or radiologically.

Results

Seven responses were observed (3 CRs), with a median response duration of 5 months. The median time to treatment failure and overall survival for all 19 patients was respectively 8 and 13 months. Anemia was observed in all of the treated patients (grade 3–4 in 9 cases). Only 6 of the 19 patients ended the five planned cycles of chemotherapy without any delay.

Conclusions

Although DHAD plus IFO induced a considerable number of objective responses, the limited response duration time to treatment failure, and overall survival as well as the reported side effects suggest that this is not a recommended regimen for the palliative treatment of ovarian cancer patients undergoing second-line chemotherapy.

Subcutaneous Low-Dose Interleukin-2 plus Alpha Interferon in Advanced Malignant Melanoma

Aims and Background

Interferon (IFN) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) have been proven to be active agents in the treatment of malignant melanoma, but the most effective doses of these cytokines were often associated to important side effects and poor patient compliance. Recently, the subcutaneous administration of low-dose IL-2 was found to be a well-tolerated and effective treatment for renal cancer. Since the combination of low doses of IL-2 and IFN has been hypothesized to have synergistic biologic and cytotoxic effects, we evaluated feasibility and patient compliance of a scheme that combined recombinant IFN-alpha (rIFN-α) (3 million units by intramuscular injection, 3 times a week) plus low-dose IL-2 (9 million IU, 3 to 5 times a week) administered subcutaneously for 2 weeks every 28 days.

Results

Fifteen patients with disseminated malignant melanoma previously treated with chemotherapy entered the study. All but the first 2 self-administered the therapy at home and were followed in an out-patient setting. None of them required in-patient care for toxicity. No WHO grade 4 side effects were detected; the only grade 3 side effects were fever and asthenia in 5 % of the cycles. Mild hematologic toxicity (grade 2) was observed at the highest weekly dose of IL-2. No major responses were observed in this subset of heavily pretreated patients.

Conclusions

We conclude that the regimen studied is feasible and well tolerated in an out-patient setting, but it is unlikely to be effective. The good patient compliance makes this schedule eligible to evaluate whether IL-2 plus rIFN-α can enhance the results of chemotherapy in this disease.

Abstract P6-14-01: The effect trial: A randomized phase II trial evaluating two different doses of weekly (W) NAB-paclitaxel (NP) as first-line chemotherapy in older breast cancer (BC) patients (pts)

Background: W taxanes (T) are commonly used in the treatment of older BC pts, with neurotoxicity (NTX) and fatigue being dose-limiting toxicities with a possible negative impact on function. No prospective data exists on the safety and efficacy of W NP in this population. NP might be of particular value in older pts, due to no need for premedication with steroids and shorter time to recovery from neurotoxicity than conventional T, resulting in a reduced risk of exacerbation of comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes, and possibly of functional decline (FD). Methods: Pts aged ≥ 65 years (y) with Her-2 negative or Her-2 positive (+), but contraindicated to anti-Her-2 therapy, advanced BC were randomized to receive NP as first-line chemotherapy at either 100 (Arm A) or 125 mg/m2 (Arm B), days 1, 8, 15 q 28. The primary end-point was event-free survival (EFS). An event was either disease progression (PD), death, or FD - defined as a decrease of at least 1 point from baseline values of activities of daily living (ADL) or instrumental ADL (IADL), deemed by the investigator as treatment-related and confirmed at the subsequent cycle. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) in pts with measurable disease, and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results: From January 2013 to September 2016, 160 pts were randomized in 15 Italian centres; all but 2 who never started NP were eligible for final analysis. Pts median age was 72y (range 65-84) in Arm A and 73y (range 65-88) in Arm B. Median ECOG performance status was 0 (range 0-2). Baseline IADL impairment was reported in 20 pts (25%) in both arms. >80% pts had ER+ tumors; 2 pts had HER2+ disease. Visceral disease was present in 71% (Arm A) and 70% (Arm B) of pts. Prior exposure to T in the neo/adjuvant setting was 14% (Arm A) and 13% (Arm B). Median number of delivered cycles of NP was 6 (range 1-28 in Arm A, and 1-22 in Arm B), with 3 pts still on treatment. Dose reductions were similarly reported (72% of pts Arm A, 78% of pts Arm B). At a median follow-up of 21 months (mos) (Interquartile range 14-28.4) 140 events were observed. Arm A/Arm B: PD n=53(67%)/n=52(66%); FD n=13(15%)/n=14(18%), death n=3(4%)n=5(6%). Outcomes data are reported in the following table:

Outcomes Arm AArm BMedian EFS, mos (90% CI)6.2 (5.5-8.4)6.4 (5.8-7.7)Median PFS, mos (95% CI)8.3 (5.9-10.5)8.8 (7.4-10.3)RR (95% CI)37% (25-50)42% (30-54)

Fatigue (Arm A: grade (G)2 29%, G3 11%; Arm B: G2 46%, G3 5%) and NTX (Arm A: G2 15%, G3 4%; Arm B: G2 28%, G3 8%) were the most frequently reported AEs. No G4 AEs were reported with the exception of neutropenia (1 pt in arm A) and leucopenia (3 pts in Arm A, 1 pt in arm B). 1 G5 (sepsis) was recorded in Arm B. NTX was reported as the reason for treatment discontinuation in 21 pts (13%) of whom 16 (21%) in arm B. Conclusion: Looking at classical study endpoints (PFS, RR), both doses of NP are active in older pts. However, 17% of pts had to stop treatment due to FD, assessed according to predefined criteria. Due to similar efficacy and reduced NTX, W NP 100 is the suggested dose to be used in older pts with advanced BC.

Citation Format: Biganzoli L, Berardi R, Pedersini R, Minisini AM, Caremoli ER, Spazzapan S, Lima JS, Baldari D, Orlando L, Magnolfi E, Pistelli M, Brunello A, Zafarana E, Bernardo A, Leo S, Colleoni M, Donati S, De Placido S, Parolin V, Vitale S, Di Leo A, Puglisi F, Boni L, Cinieri S. The effect trial: A randomized phase II trial evaluating two different doses of weekly (W) NAB-paclitaxel (NP) as first-line chemotherapy in older breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-14-01.

Toxicity profile differences of adjuvant docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) between Asian and Caucasian breast cancer patients

AIM

For early-stage breast cancer, four cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) was proven superior to doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in the US Oncology 9375 trial. Given primary prophylactic antibiotics, 5% febrile neutropenia was recorded in a population comprising 75.5% Caucasians. Smaller trials and retrospective studies reviewing TC use in Asian patients did not produce similar incidence rates. This study aims to discover the variable hematological toxicities with TC use in Caucasian and Asian patients.

METHODS

Breast cancer data was retrospectively reviewed for patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel 60-75 mg/m² plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² from six countries (China, Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Italy, and United States). Similar number of patients with relatively balanced baseline characteristics were chosen for analysis of hematological and nonhematological toxicities and survival data.

RESULTS

From March 2004 to July 2013, data of 227 patients (127 Asians and 100 Caucasian) patients were analyzed for treatment-related toxicities. During the four cycles of TC, Asians had a significantly higher rate of grade ≥2 neutropenia than Caucasians (45.7% vs 6.0%; P <0.001) and significantly more grade ≥3 neutropenia events were documented (respectively 30.7% vs 4.0%, P <0.001). The prophylactic use of G-CSF was similar; 26.0% in Asians and 28.0% in Caucasian (P = 0.764). There were no differences in nonhematological toxicities. No significant difference in disease-free survival was observed between Asians and Caucasians (log-rank P = 0.910).

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnic differences in toxicity profile exist between Asian and Caucasian patients given adjuvant TC. Over 30% Asians but less than 5% Caucasians experienced grade ≥3 neutropenia.

Cardiac safety, efficacy, and correlation of serial serum HER2-extracellular domain shed antigen measurement with the outcome of the combined trastuzumab plus CMF in women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: results from the EORTC 10995 phase II study

PURPOSE

Cardiotoxicity is a side effect of trastuzumab. We assessed efficacy and cardiac safety of CMF with trastuzumab (CMF+T) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients (MBC).

METHODS

In this phase II study, centrally confirmed, previously treated HER2-positive MBC patients with measurable disease (per RECIST v 1.0) were enrolled. Initially, patients were randomized between 8 CMF cycles alone or combined with trastuzumab during chemotherapy, followed by 3-weekly trastuzumab maintenance till progression. A protocol amendment dropped the CMF arm and thereafter all patients received CMF+T. Translational research for prediction of treatment benefit was performed through serial serum HER2-shed antigen assessments.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (CMF: 19; CMF+T: 71) were enrolled between 2002 and 2006. Median age was 54 years. 42 patients had prior chemotherapy (33 with anthracyclines) and 41/71 patients who received CMF+T continued trastuzumab monotherapy for a median duration of 40 weeks. Overall response rate was 50% for CMF+T (35/70) and 32% for CMF (6/19). Median duration of response was 10.3 months and 5.4 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 9.4 months (95% CI 8.1-11.6) and 4.8 months (95% CI 2.8-7.9), respectively. In the CMF+T arm, 13(18%) patients had an absolute LVEF decline, including 3 patients developing any grade of New York Heart Association cardiac dysfunction. Patients with an increase of 30% over baseline shed antigen had a higher progression risk (95% CI 7.6, 3.9-14.8).

CONCLUSIONS

CMF+T is effective, with an acceptable cardiotoxicity profile. LVEF declines were mostly asymptomatic and occurred irrespective of previous anthracycline exposure. CMF+T can be considered for these patients, if other cytotoxics are contraindicated.

Abstract P5-15-07: First and further line choices of treatment for HER2-VE metastatic breast cancer (MBC) according to adjuvant treatment and biological subtype. Preliminary results of the observational “GIM-13 – AMBRA” Italian study

Frequency of CHT regimens according to biological subtypes and Setting of treatmentLuminal TumoursSettingRegimenAdj (%)1st-line (%)2nd-line (%)3rd-line (%)anthra-based (w/o Taxanes)44.27.15.19.9Anthra-Taxanes30.52.60.50CMF-like17.50.61.02.1Taxane mono/combo*6.319.314.521.5Pacliataxel + Bevacizumab020.24.33.7Platinum-based03.61.70.8Capecitabine +/- Vinorelbine019.122.217.4Eribuline002.312.4 TNBCSettingRegimenAdj (%)1st-line (%)2nd-line (%)3rd-line (%)Anthra-based (w/o Taxanes)25.73.15.116.2Anthra-Taxanes36.11.100CMF-like8.22.15.10Taxane mono/combo*6.318.417.810.8Paclitaxel + Bevacizumab024.71.70Platinum-based020.622.42.7Capecitabine +/- Vinorelbine025.720.610.8Eribuline003.429.7**Irrespectively of biological subtype, nab-paclitaxel was used in 3.6%, 15.3% and 16.4% of cases in 1st, 2nd and 3rd line, respectively

BACKGROUND

Breast Cancer prognosis improved in the last years due both to early diagnosis and Adj treatments. The choice of CHT regimens should consider previous Adj treatments, pattern of relapse and biological subtype. There are few information on the treatment of MBC in the clinical practice outside controlled trials, last study has been published 15 yrs ago in Italy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The GIM13-AMBRA Study is a multicenter longitudinal cohort study, describing the choice of first and subsequent lines of treatment for MBC in HER2-ve pts. We are collecting data of 30 consecutive pts from 42 Italian Centres who developed the first relapse in the years 2012-2015 and were treated with CHT, (+/- previous endocrine treatments (HT)) for MBC. One of the secondary aims is to evaluate the Time to Treatment Change (TTC) (time between treatment start and its change for any reason) as surrogate endpoint for Time To Progression outside clinical trials. The present report is focused on the choice of treatments in any line and TTC, according to biological subtypes. .

RESULTS

For the present analysis, 683 pts are evaluable. Pts with Luminal A and B tumours received CHT and HT in 65.3% (Adjuvant), 21.7% (1st line), 7.1% (2nd line) and 7% (3rd line) of the cases. The most used regimens according to tumour subtype and line of treatment are shown in Table 1.

Median TTC from 1st to 2nd line was 8.1 and 17.9 months in TNBC and Luminal tumours, respectively, whereas TTC from 2nd to 3rd line was 3.1 and 12.9 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary results of the AMBRA-GIM13 Italian observational study confirm that in most cases treatment for MBC is strongly related to the type of the Adj regimen, being the use of anthracyclines marginal in MBC, whereas taxanes are widely used in any line. In 1st line the most used regimens are Taxane and Bevacizumab or Capecitabine/Vinorelbine combinations. The last one remains the most used CHT in 2nd and 3rd lines. No difference have been observed according to biological subtype, except for Platinum-based regimens in TNBC. HT alone remains the preferred choice in 1st and 2nd line in Luminal cases. TTC seems to be a reliable surrogate for PFS in the “real world” practice . CHT still plays a crucial role in the treatment of MBC HER2-ve pts.

Citation Format: Mustacchi G, Cazzaniga ME, Biganzoli L, De Laurentiis M, Del Mastro L, De Placido S, Donadio M, Garrone O, Giordano M, Latini L, Livi L, Marchetti P, Michelotti A, Montemurro F, Natoli C, Pronzato P, Riccardi F, Turletti A. First and further line choices of treatment for HER2-VE metastatic breast cancer (MBC) according to adjuvant treatment and biological subtype. Preliminary results of the observational “GIM-13 – AMBRA” Italian study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-07.

Abstract P2-08-01: Results from a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2 trial evaluating exemestane ± enzalutamide in patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Abstract P5-14-09: Luminal A breast cancer: Is it really a “good prognosis” disease? Prelimary results of the GIM-13 - AMBRA study

This abstract was not presented at the symposium.

Abstract OT3-01-05: PANACEA (IBCSG 45-13/BIG 4-13): A phase Ib/II trial evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab and trastuzumab in patients with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer

Background

Preclinical and correlative clinical data suggest that HER2-positive breast cancer could be amenable to immunotherapeutic approaches. We hypothesize that immune evasion contributes to tumor growth and progression in HER2-positive tumors and anti-PD1 restores T cell cytotoxicity reverting trastuzumab resistance.

Eligibility criteria

Patients with HER2-positive, PD-L1 expressing, unresectable loco-regional or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression during treatment with trastuzumab or subsequent anti-HER2 therapy of not more than 3 lines.

HER2 overexpression and PD-L1 expression confirmed in central laboratories based on tissue obtained within 1 year prior to study entry.

Objective

The primary objectives of this phase Ib/II study are to determine the recommended dose (RP2D) of pembrolizumab in combination with standard dose trastuzumab, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of the drug combination in patients with PD-L1 positive, HER2 overexpressing unresectable loco-regional or metastatic breast cancer.

Trial design

The phase Ib portion of the trial will use a standard 3+3 design to determine the RP2D of standard-dose trastuzumab with three pembrolizumab dose levels: 2 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, or a fall-back dose of 1 mg/kg. A Simon optimal two-stage design will be used in the phase II portion to assess the primary outcome of objective response. Pembrolizumab at the RP2D will be given with trastuzumab (6 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks) until disease progression or lack of tolerability. The null hypothesis that the true objective response rate (ORR) is 7% will be tested against a one-sided alternative rate of 22%. In the first stage, 17 patients will be enrolled. If there are zero or one responses, enrollment will stop. Otherwise, 23 additional patients will be accrued. The null hypothesis will be rejected if 6 or more objective responses are observed in 40 evaluable patients. This design has a type-I error of 0.05 and 85% power. If the null hypothesis is true, the probability is 0.66 that enrollment will stop at the end of the first stage.

Two concurrent analyses of the data will take place at the end of the first stage. One analysis will assess ORR using the criteria described above. The second will be a detailed review of safety data.

Statistical methods

Primary and secondary endpoints will be based on patients enrolled in the phase II trial. ORR will be presented with a two-sided 90% confidence interval calculated using the method of Atkinson and Brown. The distributions of time-to-event secondary endpoints, such as duration of response and time to progression, will be summarized using the method of Kaplan-Meier.

Present accrual and target accrual

As of 3 June 2015 11 patients have been screened for HER2 and PD-L1 positivity, and 3 successfully enrolled, completing the first dose cohort. Target enrollment of this phase Ib/II trial is 6-46 evaluable patients. Discussions are ongoing to include a PD-L1 negative cohort.

Contact information

Conducted by the International Breast Cancer Study Group and the Breast International Group in collaboration with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

Citation Format: Loi S, Andre F, Maibach R, Hui R, Bartsch R, Jerusalem G, Gombos A, Campone M, Bonnefoi H, Bachelot T, Curigliano G, Biganzoli L, Giobbie-Hurder A. PANACEA (IBCSG 45-13/BIG 4-13): A phase Ib/II trial evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab and trastuzumab in patients with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-05.

Mass balance and life cycle assessment of the waste electrical and electronic equipment management system implemented in Lombardia Region (Italy)

Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) is one of the fastest growing waste streams in Europe, whose content of hazardous substances as well as of valuable materials makes the study of the different management options particularly interesting. The present study investigates the WEEE management system in Lombardia Region (Italy) in the year 2011 by applying the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. An extensive collection of primary data was carried out to describe the main outputs and the energy consumptions of the treatment plants. Afterwards, the benefits and burdens associated with the treatment and recovery of each of the five categories in which WEEE is classified according to the Italian legislation (heaters and refrigerators - R1, large household appliances - R2, TV and monitors - R3, small household appliances - R4 and lighting equipment - R5) were evaluated. The mass balance of the treatment and recovery system of each of the five WEEE categories showed that steel and glass are the predominant streams of materials arising from the treatment; a non-negligible amount of plastic is also recovered, together with small amounts of precious metals. The LCA of the regional WEEE management system showed that the benefits associated with materials and energy recovery balance the burdens of the treatment processes, with the sole exception of two impact categories (human toxicity-cancer effects and freshwater ecotoxicity). The WEEE categories whose treatment and recovery resulted more beneficial for the environment and the human health are R3 and R5. The contribution analysis showed that overall the main benefits are associated with the recovery of metals, as well as of plastic and glass. Some suggestions for improving the performance of the system are given, as well as an indication for a more-in-depth analysis for the toxicity categories and a proposal for a new characterisation method for WEEE.

The requirements of a specialist Breast Centre

INTRODUCTION

In recognition of the advances and evidence based changes in clinical practice that have occurred in recent years and taking into account the knowledge and experience accumulated through the voluntary breast unit certification programme, Eusoma has produced this up-dated and revised guidelines on the requirements of a Specialist Breast Centre (BC).

METHODS

The content of these guidelines is based on evidence from the recent relevant peer reviewed literature and the consensus of a multidisciplinary team of European experts. The guidelines define the requirements for each breast service and for the specialists who work in specialist Breast Centres.

RESULTS

The guidelines identify the minimum requirements needed to set up a BC, these being an integrated Breast Centre, dealing with a sufficient number of cases to allow effective working and continuing expertise, dedicated specialists working with a multidisciplinary approach, providing all services throughout the patients pathway and data collection and audit. It is essential that the BC also guarantees the continuity of care for patients with advanced (metastatic) disease offering treatments according to multidisciplinary competencies and a high quality palliative care service. The BC must ensure that comprehensive support and expertise may be needed, not only through the core BC team, but also ensure that all other medical and paramedical expertise that may be necessary depending on the individual case are freely available, referring the patient to the specific care provider depending on the problem.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying minimum requirements and quality indicators is essential to improve organisation, performance and outcome in breast care. Efficacy and compliance have to be constantly monitored to evaluate the quality of patient care and to allow appropriate corrective actions leading to improvements in patient care.

Feasibility and safety of dose-dense docetaxel after conventional epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Although dose-dense chemotherapy may reduce breast cancer recurrence and death, phase II studies show that dose-dense docetaxel is poorly tolerated following administration of dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy mainly because of cutaneous toxicity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This pilot study was designed to explore feasibility and safety of dose-dense docetaxel after conventional anthracycline-based therapy. Treatment consisted of sequential administration of 4 cycles of 3-weekly epirubicin (90 mg/m(2)) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)), followed by 4 cycles of bi-weekly docetaxel with pelfilgrastim on day 2 of each docetaxel cycle. Two docetaxel dose levels were planned: 75 mg/m(2) (D75) and 100 mg/m(2) (D100). Patients could only be assigned to the higher docetaxel dose if no early treatment discontinuations due to toxicity were seen, and a median relative dose intensity of docetaxel >90% among the first 5 evaluable patients was achieved.

RESULTS

Fifty three patients received 4 cycles of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC). Six patients withdrew from study before commencing docetaxel: four for toxicity, and two who declined further study participation. Eight patients, 2 in the first dose level and 6 in the second dose level, stopped treatment for toxicity after the first cycle of docetaxel and before densification. Therefore these events were not considered early treatment discontinuations. No patients required dose interruption after the second docetaxel administration. Overall 5 patients in the first dose level and 34 patients in the second dose level received 4 cycles of accelerated (dose-dense) docetaxel. No grade 3 or grade 4 toxicities occurred at the first dose level. No grade 4 toxicities occurred at the second dose level, while grade 3 toxicities occurring in >2 patients were myalgia and bone pain (5 and 8 patients respectively, 13% and 20%) and skin-nail toxicity (7 patients, 21%). No dose-reductions or significant treatment delays were required, translating to median relative dose intensity of 100% for docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), and 99% for 100 mg/m(2).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) bi-weekly after conventional EC is feasible in selected early breast cancer patients. Lack of prior exposure to dose-dense anthracycline, as well as the use of stringent criteria implemented in the treatment protocol, might explain the improved safety profile and high treatment compliance observed in this study.

Evaluation of the cardiovascular health study (CHS) instrument and the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13) in elderly cancer patients. Are we still missing the right screening tool?

BACKGROUND

A geriatric screening tool would be valuable to identify elderly cancer patients who might benefit from a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). This study evaluated the accuracy of the cardiovascular health study (CHS) instrument in predicting abnormality in CGA. The vulnerable elders' survey-13 (VES-13) was also evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 70 years with solid tumors underwent a CGA after being screened with the CHS and VES-13. Analyses were conducted for the overall population and according to the disease status (early or advanced) and type of early cancer (breast or gastrointestinal, GI).

RESULTS

Of 259 patients, 75% were impaired according to the CHS and 47% according to the VES-13. CGA impairment was reported in 171 patients (66%). In the overall population, overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of CHS in identifying CGA impairments were 74%, 87% and 49%, respectively. The corresponding figures for the VES-13 were 68%, 62% and 81%. Sensitivity and specificity of CHS in predicting CGA impairments in subgroups were early 81% and 55%, advanced 98% and 29%; early breast 78% and 69%, early GI 87.5% and 19%.

CONCLUSIONS

The CHS compared favourably with VES-13 for sensitivity. However, the great variability in specificity observed with the CHS within subgroups limits its applicability in the global population.

First-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for breast cancer: results in patients aged≥70 years treated in the ATHENA study

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on treatment outcomes in the growing population of elderly patients with locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC). To gain information on first-line bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in the elderly, we analyzed data from the ATHENA trial in routine oncology practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative LR/mBC received first-line bevacizumab with standard chemotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or physician/patient decision. We carried out a subgroup analysis of safety and efficacy in patients aged≥70 years. Possible correlations between tolerability and baseline comorbidities or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status were explored.

RESULTS

Bevacizumab was combined with single-agent paclitaxel in 46% of older patients. Only hypertension and proteinuria were more common in older than in younger patients (grade≥3 hypertension: 6.9% versus 4.2%, respectively; grade≥3 proteinuria: 4.0% versus 1.5%, respectively). Grade≥3 arterial/venous thromboembolism occurred in 2.9% versus 3.3%, respectively. Further analysis revealed no relationship between baseline presence and severity of hypertension and risk of developing hypertension during bevacizumab-containing therapy. Median time to progression was 10.4 months in patients aged≥70 years.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that bevacizumab-containing therapy is tolerable and active in patients aged≥70 years. Hypertension was more common than in younger patients but was manageable. We find no evidence precluding the use of bevacizumab in older patients, including those with hypertension, although age may influence chemotherapy choice.