Phase Ia/b Study of Giredestrant ± Palbociclib and ± Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Locally Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Giredestrant is an investigational next-generation, oral, selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader for the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. We present the primary analysis results of the phase Ia/b GO39932 study (NCT03332797).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with ER+, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy received single-agent giredestrant (10, 30, 90, or 250 mg), or giredestrant (100 mg) ± palbociclib 125 mg ± luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist. Detailed cardiovascular assessment was conducted with giredestrant 100 mg. Endpoints included safety (primary), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy.

RESULTS

As of January 28, 2021, with 175 patients enrolled, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the MTD was not reached. Adverse events (AE) related to giredestrant occurred in 64.9% and 59.4% of patients in the single-agent ± LHRH agonist and giredestrant + palbociclib ± LHRH agonist cohorts, respectively (giredestrant-only-related grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 4.5% of patients across the single-agent cohorts and 3.1% of those with giredestrant + palbociclib). Dose-dependent asymptomatic bradycardia was observed, but no clinically significant changes in cardiac-related outcomes: heart rate, blood pressure, or exercise duration. Clinical benefit was observed in all cohorts (48.6% of patients in the single-agent cohort and 81.3% in the giredestrant + palbociclib ± LHRH agonist cohort), with no clear dose relationship, including in patients with ESR1-mutated tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Giredestrant was well tolerated and clinically active in patients who progressed on prior endocrine therapy. Results warrant further evaluation of giredestrant in randomized trials in early- and late-stage ER+ breast cancer.

Optimizing Early-stage Clinical Pharmacology Evaluation to Accelerate Clinical Development of Giredestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

We describe the clinical pharmacology characterization of giredestrant in a first-in-human study.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This phase Ia/Ib dose-escalation/-expansion study (NCT03332797) evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity of giredestrant in estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. The single-agent dose-escalation stage evaluated giredestrant 10, 30, 90, or 250 mg once daily. The dose-expansion stage evaluated single-agent giredestrant at 30, 100, and 250 mg once daily. Dose-escalation and -expansion phases also evaluated giredestrant 100 mg combined with palbociclib 125 mg.

RESULTS

Following single-dose oral administration, giredestrant was rapidly absorbed and generally showed a dose-proportional increase in exposure at doses ranging from 10 to 250 mg. At the 30 mg clinical dose, maximum plasma concentration was 266 ng/mL (50.1%) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours at steady state was 4,320 ng·hour/mL (59.4%). Minimal giredestrant concentrations were detected in urine, indicating that renal excretion is unlikely to be a major elimination route for giredestrant. Mean concentration of 4beta-hydroxycholesterol showed no apparent increase over time at both the clinical dose (30 mg) and a supratherapeutic dose (90 mg), suggesting that giredestrant may have low CYP3A induction potential in humans. No clinically relevant drug-drug interaction was observed between giredestrant and palbociclib. Giredestrant exposure was not affected by food and was generally consistent between White and Asian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study illustrates how the integration of clinical pharmacology considerations into early-phase clinical trials can inform the design of pivotal studies and accelerate oncology drug development.

SIGNIFICANCE

This work illustrates how comprehensive clinical pharmacology characterization can be integrated into first-in-human studies in oncology. It also demonstrates the value of understanding clinical pharmacology attributes to inform eligibility, concomitant medications, and combination dosing and to directly influence late-stage trial design and accelerate development.

Giredestrant reverses progesterone hypersensitivity driven by estrogen receptor mutations in breast cancer

ESR1 (estrogen receptor 1) hotspot mutations are major contributors to therapeutic resistance in estrogen receptor-positive (ER⁺) breast cancer. Such mutations confer estrogen independence to ERα, providing a selective advantage in the presence of estrogen-depleting aromatase inhibitors. In addition, ESR1 mutations reduce the potency of tamoxifen and fulvestrant, therapies that bind ERα directly. These limitations, together with additional liabilities, inspired the development of the next generation of ERα-targeted therapeutics, of which giredestrant is a high-potential candidate. Here, we generated Esr1 mutant-expressing mammary gland models and leveraged patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to investigate the biological properties of the ESR1 mutations and their sensitivity to giredestrant in vivo. In the mouse mammary gland, Esr1 mutations promote hypersensitivity to progesterone, triggering pregnancy-like tissue remodeling and profoundly elevated proliferation. These effects were driven by an altered progesterone transcriptional response and underpinned by gained sites of ERα-PR (progesterone receptor) cobinding at the promoter regions of pro-proliferation genes. PDX experiments showed that the mutant ERα-PR proliferative program is also relevant in human cancer cells. Giredestrant suppressed the mutant ERα-PR proliferation in the mammary gland more so than the standard-of-care agents, tamoxifen and fulvestrant. Giredestrant was also efficacious against the progesterone-stimulated growth of ESR1 mutant PDX models. In addition, giredestrant demonstrated activity against a molecularly characterized ESR1 mutant tumor from a patient enrolled in a phase 1 clinical trial. Together, these data suggest that mutant ERα can collaborate with PR to drive protumorigenic proliferation but remain sensitive to inhibition by giredestrant.

Abstract P5-18-07: Heart rate changes, cardiac safety, and exercise tolerance from a phase Ia/b study of giredestrant (GDC-9545) ± palbociclib in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer

Background Targeting the activity of the estrogen receptor and/or estrogen synthesis is a standard primary treatment for eligible patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Giredestrant is a highly potent, nonsteroidal oral selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader that achieves robust estrogen receptor occupancy. In animal models and early phase studies, giredestrant was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in heart rate. Therefore, we leveraged an ongoing nonrandomized, open-label, dose-escalation and -expansion phase Ia/b study (GO39932) to evaluate its cardiac safety. Methods Eligibility criteria for the main study are available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03332797. Additional relevant cardiac exclusion criteria included current treatment with medications known to decrease heart rate, e.g., beta blockers.100 mg giredestrant was given daily on Days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle (monotherapy for 14 days; patients then continued monotherapy or received combination treatment with 125 mg daily oral palbociclib for the study duration, per investigator decision). The 100 mg giredestrant dose for this arm (rather than the phase III 30 mg dose) was evaluated to increase the likelihood of observing relevant cardiac effects. Electrocardiograms were required on Day 1 of each cycle; 24-hour Holter data were collected and treadmill-exercise testing was completed at screening (prior to starting giredestrant), steady state (Day 8 [+3 days]), and as clinically indicated. Exercise testing evaluated baseline heart rate, exercise duration, maximal heart rate, and heart rate recovery. A standard Bruce protocol was followed. Results Clinical data cutoff was Apr 16, 2021. Twenty patients were enrolled and included in the current analysis; median age was 59 (range, 45-72); three patients (15%) had a history of hypertension at screening. During follow-up, no dysrhythmias were observed that required treatment or a change in study medication, and no patients were noted to have a resting heart rate of <50 beats per minute based on routine heart rate monitoring. Two Grade 1 bradycardia events (<60 beats per minute) were reported; both in patients receiving palbociclib. No other cardiac adverse events (AEs) were reported overall, nor any other serious AEs. Holter monitoring reports were available for 19 patients at screening and 20 on treatment. There were no episodes of second- or third-degree atrioventricular block. At screening, 2/19 patients (11%) had a paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia event (SVT; ≤30 seconds). During the study, 4/20 patients (20%) had a paroxysmal SVT event and, of these, 1/4 had four episodes of an SVT event lasting >30 seconds and 1/4 also experienced one episode of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. No patients required any cardiac treatment or dose modification. Twenty patients underwent exercise testing. Exercise time was similar among patients before and after starting giredestrant (mean exercise time 7 min 10 sec before; 7 min 44 sec after). Exercise intensity was similar before and after starting treatment (mean metabolic equivalents expenditure 7.52 [standard deviation 2.81] and 8.68 [2.78], respectively). One patient had an abnormal heart rate recovery on exercise testing at screening and again while on treatment. Conclusions In a thorough cardiac safety analysis, applying routine electrocardiograms, 24-hour Holter monitoring, and exercise testing, no clinically relevant cardiac effects were observed with 100 mg giredestrant (a higher dose than the phase III 30 mg dose).

Citation Format: Tomas G Neilan, Rafael Villanueva-Vázquez, Meritxell Bellet, Elena López-Miranda, Laura García-Estévez, Peter Kabos, John Bond, Mary R Gates, Ching-Wei Chang, Valentina Boni. Heart rate changes, cardiac safety, and exercise tolerance from a phase Ia/b study of giredestrant (GDC-9545) ± palbociclib in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-07.

Evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD) and biologic activity in a preoperative window-of-opportunity (WOO) study of giredestrant (GDC-9545) in postmenopausal patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative (ER+/HER2–) operable breast cancer (BC)

577

Background: Modulation of ER activity and/or estrogen synthesis is the mainstay therapeutic strategy in ER+ BC treatment. Giredestrant is a highly potent, nonsteroidal oral selective ER degrader (SERD) that achieves robust ER occupancy and is effective regardless of ESR1 mutation status. The first short-term preoperative WOO study (NCT03916744) of giredestrant in ER+/HER2– operable BC was designed for dose selection, while providing an early readout of PD as measured by traditional immunohistochemistry (IHC) and transcriptional profiling by assessing treatment effects in paired tumor tissue pre/posttreatment. We present an interim analysis. Methods: Pts were assigned to 14 days’ preoperative treatment with 10, 30, or 100 mg PO giredestrant QD. Pts had newly diagnosed, stage I–III operable, ER+/HER2– untreated BC ≥1.5 cm in diameter (by ultrasound). Modulation of ER signaling and cell proliferation were assessed using paired formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens collected before and after ̃14 days of study treatment. ER, progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki67 protein levels were analyzed by IHC. Change from baseline in tumor cell proliferation by Ki67 was the primary endpoint. Gene expression analysis was performed using the Illumina TruSeq RNA Access method. Results: From Jul 26, 2019 to Oct 15, 2020, 46/75 biomarker-evaluable pts were enrolled across three dose cohorts (10 mg: n = 15; 30 mg: n = 18; 100 mg: n = 13). Pt demographics and tumor characteristics were similar across cohorts. Baseline PAM50 analysis classified tumors as Luminal A (77%) or B (23%). Giredestrant treatment resulted in robust and indistinguishable PD and biologic activity at all doses. Geometric mean posttreatment proportional reduction of Ki67 was 79% (95% CI: 69–89; 10 mg: 80%; 30 mg: 76%; 100 mg: 80%), and 51% of tumors exhibited complete cell cycle arrest, defined as Ki67 ≤2.7%. Mean posttreatment proportional reductions of ER and PR H-scores were 71% (95% CI: 67–75) and 60% (95% CI: 51–70), respectively. An analysis of a predefined, experimentally derived set of 38 ER target genes (the ‘ER activity signature’), was completed for 42 paired tumor specimens. Forty-one of 42 pts (98%) showed a posttreatment reduction in ER activity with a mean proportional decrease of 79% (95% CI: 70–88). A wide range of baseline ER activity was observed with no correlation to baseline ER or PR H-score, or Ki67. There were no discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). A single grade 3 serious AE was reported in each cohort (all assessed as unrelated to giredestrant). No grade 4 or 5 AEs were reported. Conclusions: Giredestrant was well tolerated in the preoperative setting in ER+/HER2– operable BC, and PDs were consistent with the 30 mg dose achieving maximal ER inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT03916744.

Safety and activity of single-agent giredestrant (GDC-9545) from a phase Ia/b study in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/mBC)

1017

Background: Targeting ER activity and/or E synthesis is a mainstay of ER+ BC treatment, but many pts relapse during/after adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) or develop resistance via ESR1 mutations that drive E-independent transcription and proliferation. Most tumors remain ER signaling-dependent and pts may respond to second-/third-line ET after disease progression (PD) on prior therapies (Di Leo 2010; Baselga 2012). Giredestrant, a highly potent, nonsteroidal oral selective ER degrader, achieves robust ER occupancy, is active despite ESR1 mutations, and was well tolerated ± palbociclib with encouraging antitumor activity in the nonrandomized, open-label, dose-escalation and -expansion, phase Ia/b GO39932 study (NCT03332797; Jhaveri 2019; Lim 2020). We present updated interim data from the dose-escalation and -expansion single-agent giredestrant cohorts. Methods: Pts had ≤2 prior therapies in the LA/mBC setting with disease recurrence/PD while being treated with adjuvant ET for ≥24 mo and/or ET in the LA/mBC setting, and derived a clinical benefit (CB) from therapy (tumor response/stable disease [SD] ≥6 mo). Pts received 10, 30, 90/100, or 250 mg PO giredestrant QD on D1–28 of each 28-day cycle. Pts were postmenopausal (medical menopause on LHRH agonists was allowed with ≥100 mg giredestrant). Results: Clinical cutoff: Jul 31, 2020; median prior therapy lines in the LA/mBC setting: 1; mean dose intensity: 98%. Safety/activity: see the table below. No adverse events (AEs) led to study drug withdrawal. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred; maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Most common AEs in 107 pts: fatigue (22; 21%), arthralgia (18; 17%), and nausea (17; 16%); largely grade 1/2. Related grade 3 AEs were infrequent (5; 5%); none were grade 4/5 per investigator assessment (grade 5 duodenal perforation occurred with 90/100 mg after stopping giredestrant due to PD). 8 (7%) had bradycardia (none with 10 mg or the 30 mg phase 3 dose; all grade 1 except one grade 2 at 250 mg; no treatment interruptions/dose reductions were required). Objective responses and CB were observed at all doses. Conclusions: Single-agent giredestrant was well tolerated at all doses, with no DLTs. AEs were generally low grade and in keeping with expected AEs for ETs. Clinical activity was observed at all doses. Updated data, including biomarker and correlative data, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03332797 .[Table: see text]

A phase Ib study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader GDC-9545 alone or combined with palbociclib in metastatic ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer

1023

Background: GDC-9545 is a potent, orally available, selective estrogen receptor degrader developed for the treatment of ER-positive (ER+) breast cancer alone or combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors. A first-in-human study evaluated 10-250 mg GDC-9545; tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and clinical results support expansion cohorts at ≥30 mg (Jhaveri et al., 2019). Methods: This study evaluated PK, PD, and efficacy of GDC-9545 alone and combined with palbociclib, ± LHRH agonist. Eligible patients (pts) had ER+ (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with ≤ 2 prior therapies in the advanced or metastatic setting. No prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitor was allowed in pts receiving palbociclib. Results: Eight-five pts were enrolled in 2 cohorts: GDC-9545 100 mg given once daily ± LHRH agonist (Cohort A), and GDC-9545 100 mg +125 mg palbociclib on a 21 day on/7 day off schedule ± LHRH agonist (Cohort B). Of the 39 pts in Cohort A, adverse events (AE) occurring in ≥10% of pts were fatigue, cough, back pain, pain in extremity, and arthralgia. Related AEs were generally Grade (G) 1-2; there were 3 related G3 AEs of fatigue, transaminase increased, and diarrhea. Two pts had GDC-9545 reduced, one due to G3 diarrhea and another due to G3 transaminitis. Of the 46 pts in Cohort B, AEs in ≥10% of pts were neutropenia, fatigue, bradycardia, diarrhea, constipation, dizziness, nausea, anemia, asthenia, thrombocytopenia, pruritus, and visual impairment. Twenty-six (57%) pts had G≥3 AEs. G≥3 neutropenia was reported in 23 (50%) pts. One pt had palbociclib reduced due to G3 febrile neutropenia. Eleven (13%) of 85 pts had G1 asymptomatic bradycardia considered related to GDC-9545. No pts in either cohort discontinued study treatment due to AEs. PK analysis and clinical data demonstrate no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions between GDC-9545 and palbociclib. Reduced ER, PR, and Ki67 levels, and an ER activity signature, were observed in paired pre- and on-treatment biopsies (n = 12). Eighteen of 33 pts in Cohort A had either confirmed partial responses or were on study 24 weeks (clinical benefit rate 55%). Clinical benefit was observed in pts with prior fulvestrant treatment and with detectable ESR1 mutations at enrollment. Clinical benefit data for both cohorts are anticipated to be mature in April 2020. Conclusions: GDC-9545 was well-tolerated as a single agent and in combination with palbociclib with encouraging PK, PD, and anti-tumor activity in ER+ MBC to support Phase III development. Clinical trial information: NCT03332797 .

Phase Ib study of the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib (GDC-0973) in combination with the PI3K inhibitor pictilisib (GDC-0941) in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose We investigated the combination of the MEK inhibitor, cobimetinib, and the pan-PI3K inhibitor, pictilisib, in an open-label, phase Ib study. Experimental Design Patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in 3 dose escalation schedules: (1) both agents once-daily for 21-days-on 7-days-off ("21/7"); (2) intermittent cobimetinib and 21/7 pictilisib ("intermittent"); or (3) both agents once-daily for 7-days-on 7-days-off ("7/7"). Starting doses for the 21/7, intermittent, and 7/7 schedules were 20/80, 100/130, and 40/130 mg of cobimetinib/pictilisib, respectively. Nine indication-specific expansion cohorts interrogated the recommended phase II dose and schedule. Results Of 178 enrollees (dose escalation: n = 98), 177 patients were dosed. The maximum tolerated doses for cobimetinib/pictilisib (mg) were 40/100, 125/180, and not reached, for the 21/7, intermittent, and 7/7 schedules, respectively. Six dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 (G3) elevated lipase, G4 elevated creatine phosphokinase, and G3 events including fatigue concurrent with a serious adverse event (SAE) of diarrhea, decreased appetite, and SAEs of hypersensitivity and dehydration. Common drug-related adverse events included nausea, fatigue, vomiting, decreased appetite, dysgeusia, rash, and stomatitis. Pharmacokinetic parameters of the drugs used in combination were unaltered compared to monotherapy exposures. Confirmed partial responses were observed in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma (n = 1) and KRAS-mutant endometrioid adenocarcinoma (n = 1). Eighteen patients remained on study ≥6 months. Biomarker data established successful blockade of MAP kinase (MAPK) and PI3K pathways. The metabolic response rate documented by FDG-PET was similar to that observed with cobimetinib monotherapy. Conclusions Cobimetinib and pictilisib combination therapy in patients with solid tumors had limited tolerability and efficacy.

A first-in-human phase Ib study to evaluate the MEK inhibitor GDC-0973, combined with the pan-PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2566

Background: Both RAS/RAF/MEK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways are deregulated in many tumor types. Targeting both pathways may be more efficacious than targeting either pathway alone. In preclinical models, concurrent administration of GDC‑0973, a potent, selective, MEK1/2 inhibitor and GDC-0941, a potent class I PI3K inhibitor, shows improved efficacy compared to either agent alone dosed continuously or intermittently. Methods: A phase Ib dose-escalation study with 3+3 design was initiated in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral dosing of GDC-0973 and GDC-0941. Pts received: concurrent GDC-0973 + GDC-0941 once daily (qd) on a 21 day on/7 day off (21/7) schedule; intermittent GDC-0973 on Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18 of a 28 day cycle + GDC-0941 qd on a 21/7 schedule (MEK int); or GDC-0973 + GDC-0941 qd on a 7 day on /7 day off schedule (7/7). Starting doses were 20 mg GDC-0973 + 80 mg GDC-0941 (21/7), 100 mg GDC-0973 + 130 mg GDC-0941 (MEK int); 40 mg GDC-0973 + 130 mg GDC-0941 (7/7). Serial plasma PK samples, FDG-PET, and CT scans were obtained. Results: 78 pts have enrolled. DLTs were G3 lipase (n=1), G4 CPK elevation (n=1). Compared to the 21/7 MTD of 40 mg GDC-0973 + 100 mg GDC-0941, higher doses of GDC-0973 + GDC-0941 were tolerated on the MEK int schedule. Overall, adverse events related to the study drug combination in ≥ 20% pts were diarrhea, rash, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, decreased appetite, dysgeusia, and elevated CPK. Preliminary analysis indicated PK of GDC-0973 and GDC-0941 are not altered when dosed in combination. Of 46 evaluable pts, 26 had an FDG-PET partial metabolic response (≥ 20% decrease in mean SUVmax from baseline) at ≥1 time points. Partial responses were observed in 3 pts (mBRAF melanoma, mBRAF pancreatic ca, mKRAS endometrioid ca); 5 pts had stable disease ≥ 5 months. Conclusions: Combination dosing of GDC‑0973 and GDC-0941 is generally well tolerated, with toxicities similar to those observed in single agent GDC-0973 and GDC-0941 phase 1 trials. There are early signs of anti-tumor activity. Dose escalation on MEK int and 7/7 schedules continues and updated data will be presented.

Pregnant mothers out of the perinatal regionalization's reach

INTRODUCTION

Birth of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants outside subspecialty perinatal centers increases risk for death and major morbidities.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate barriers to utilizing a regional perinatal center for the birth of VLBW infants to mothers not living in the immediate vicinity of the center.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of VLBW infants residing in the catchment area of a community level II, Specialty Neonatal Unit (SN) admitted to a Regional Subspecialty Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (RC) between January 1999 and December 31, 2004. Maternal demographics and prenatal care as well as outcomes were compared by place of birth.

RESULTS

Out of 98 VLBW infants admitted to the RC, 49 (50%) were delivered outside the RC (out-born) and 49 (50%) were born at the RC (in-born). There was no statistical difference in insurance coverage, race, gestational age, severity of illness or maternal demographic factors between out-born and in-born infants. Less than adequate prenatal care rather than distance of maternal residence from the RC was associated with birth outside the RC. Adjusting for prenatal care, distance of residence from the RC increased the risk for delivering outside the center in the subset of mothers insured by Medicaid.

CONCLUSIONS

Mothers of VLBW infants who received less than adequate prenatal care and did not live in the vicinity of a subspecialty center had an increased risk for delivery outside that center compared to those with adequate care. Appropriate place of birth for VLBW infants to low-income mothers may be influenced by the distance of their residence to an RC.

Kainate receptor agonists, antagonists and allosteric modulators

Interest in kainate receptors has increased over the past few years. Our understanding of their physiology and pharmacology has improved markedly since their original cloning and expression in the early 1990s. For example, agonist profiles at recombinant kainate receptors have been used to identify and distinguish kainate receptors in neurons. Furthermore, the development of selective antagonists for kainate receptor subtypes has increased our understanding of the functional roles of kainate receptors in neurons and synaptic transmission. In this review we described the activity of agonists and antagonists at kainate receptors and their selectivity profiles at NMDA and non-NMDA receptors.

Novel AMPA receptor potentiators LY392098 and LY404187: effects on recombinant human AMPA receptors in vitro

The present study describes the activity of two novel potent and selective AMPA receptor potentiator molecules LY392098 and LY404187. LY392098 and LY404187 enhance glutamate (100 microM) stimulated ion influx through recombinant homomeric human AMPA receptor ion channels, GluR1-4, with estimated EC(50) values of 1.77 microM (GluR1(i)), 0.22 microM (GluR2(i)), 0.56 microM (GluR2(o)), 1.89 microM (GluR3(i)) and 0.20 microM (GluR4(i)) for LY392098 and EC(50) values of 5.65 microM (GluR1(i)), 0.15 microM (GluR2(i)), 1.44 microM (GluR2(o)), 1.66 microM (GluR3(i)) and 0.21 microM (GluR4(i)) for LY404187. Neither compound affected ion influx in untransfected HEK293 cells or GluR transfected cells in the absence of glutamate. Both compounds were selective for activity at AMPA receptors, with no activity at human recombinant kainate receptors. Electrophysiological recordings demonstrated that glutamate (1 mM)-evoked inward currents in human GluR4 transfected HEK293 cells were potentiated by LY392098 and LY404187 at low concentrations (3-10 nM). In addition, both compounds removed glutamate-dependent desensitization of recombinant GluR4 AMPA receptors. These studies demonstrate that LY392098 and LY404187 allosterically potentiate responses mediated by human AMPA receptor ion channels expressed in HEK 293 cells in vitro.

The novel atypical antipsychotic olanzapine, but not the CCK-B antagonist LY288513, blocks apomorphine-induced disruption of pre-pulse inhibition

Pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response is the diminution of the startle response when the startle stimulus is preceded by a weaker, non-startle-eliciting stimulus. Deficits in PPI occur in animals following the administration of apomorphine and in schizophrenic patients. In this study, we examined the ability of the novel atypical antipsychotic olanzapine and the cholecystokinin (CCK)-B antagonist LY288513 to reverse the apomorphine-induced disruption of pre-pulse inhibition. Olanzapine (3.0 and 5.0 mg/kg, i.p.), but not LY288513 (1.0-100 mg/kg, p.o.), blocked apomorphine-induced disruption of PPI. These results indicate that olanzapine, but not LY288513, has dopamine antagonist properties in vivo and predict that olanzapine, but not LY288513, will have antipsychotic activity in man.

User-friendly computerized quality assurance program for regionalized neonatal care

In October 1983 a computerized data base system was implemented to perform quality assurance in the neonatal referral region of the University of Michigan. This system was customized to match and expand forms and reports already in use. It is menu driven, requires only rudimentary skills, and is compatible with existing computer equipment. To assess the effectiveness of the program in monitoring and improving neonatal care within the region, data from the first full year (1984) were compared with data from the last full year (1990). Statistically significant changes were found for referring physician presence at transfer, a greater assumption of initial stabilization procedures by community hospital personnel (continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring, orogastric tube placement, provision of respiratory support, blood glucose screening, blood gas evaluation, blood culturing, and antibiotic therapy), and an overall improvement in patient status before transfer. Review of reports generated by data analysis enables design of educational programs that are hospital specific and that focus on problems or deficiencies determined during quality assurance conferences. The chief benefit of this system is the provision of an objective basis for constructive criticism, which leads to both cognitive and behavioral changes in care providers and ultimately improves the delivery of care to neonates.